DOCSLIB.ORG

2 Chronicles 21-24 Good Evening Church, Thank You for Coming out Tonight, and Thank You to Those of You Watching Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 Chronicles 21-24 Good Evening Church, Thank You for Coming out Tonight, and Thank You to Those of You Watching Online Page 1 of 32 2 Chronicles 21-24 Good evening church, thank you for coming out tonight, and thank you to those of you watching online. Tonight, I know you will not be surprised, but we are going to continue on in our Study through the Old Testament. I will say, as we journey through the Bible as we are here at Calvary Chapel Victorville, it is interesting and sometimes surprising how timely the text is. Tonight we will be in 2 Chronicles 21-24, and we will see that there are some things happening in these verses that speak to the historic events of our own day. So let’s pray, and we will get into God’s Word. Now, our focus has primarily been the Southern Kingdom of Judah in our study through the Chronicles. We now pick up the historical narrative here at the death of King Jehoshaphat. Remember he was considered a good king, but as all men do he had some flaws. He made some very foolish alliances with the evil kings of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. And evil alliances, this being spiritually unequally yoked, always comes with dire consequences, that sometimes last well beyond the initial incident. Page 2 of 32 That will be the case for Jehoshaphat’s folly, it will be felt even long after his death. Our kids will be the ones that ultimately pay for our lackadaisical attitude toward sin in our lives. So let’s get into it, Chapter 21 verse 1… Jehoram Reigns in Judah(1 Kings 22:50; 2 Kings 8:16- 24) 21:1 And Jehoshaphat rested with his fathers, and was buried with his fathers in the City of David. Then Jehoram his son reigned in his place. 2 He had brothers, the sons of Jehoshaphat: Azariah, Jehiel, Zechariah, Azaryahu, Michael, and Shephatiah; all these were the sons of Jehoshaphat king of Israel. 3 Their father gave them great gifts of silver and gold and precious things, with fortified cities in Judah; but he gave the kingdom to Jehoram, because he was the firstborn. 4 Now when Jehoram was established over the kingdom of his father, he strengthened himself and killed all his brothers with the sword, and also others of the princes of Israel. So, Jehoshaphat dies, leaving the kingdom to his oldest son, Jehoram. Now, remember from last time, this is the son that married the wicked king Ahab’s daughter in an evil alliance. Page 3 of 32 We see the compromise in Jehoshaphat is now playing out in a terrible way with his son. The daughter of Ahab and Jezebel obviously shared in their wickedness, and is influencing the new king. Jehoram begins his reign by killing all his brothers so they could not be a threat to his rule. He character is highly flawed. It shows the great insecurity of a leader to shut out all opposition, to silence those who might oppose them. It also is a sign of weakness and wickedness. If Jehoram trusted in his father’s God, he would have stability in his Kingdom, stability, and hope. But he has gotten off course from the direction of Israel’s God, and now wickedness is at the helm of the government. I wonder, if we can imagine a government that is so wicked that it would try to silence only certain voices? I wonder, if we can think of a government now, trying to rule through deceit and lies, who is desperately trying to cover up any Truth that might oppose them or invalidate them? Unfortunately, we don’t have to look to foreign lands any longer, there is an attempt now to silence opposition here in the US. Even our church services are getting dinged on YouTube right now, they are accusing us of producing Page 4 of 32 pornographic content, and they don’t give us any avenue to dispute it. There is a dark war happening right now in this country, trying to silence Truth. And look, this is for those online viewers, there very well can soon be coming a day where the only way to hear God’s Word from this pulpit is to come to church here. We will keep putting content out, as long as the tyrannical forces at work allow, but that avenue may soon be closed to us. We might have to have church the old fashion way, here among the Body of Christ. So Jehoram silences all opposition, he murders those who were a threat, and we read now. 5 Jehoram was thirty-two years old when he became king, and he reigned eight years in Jerusalem. 6 And he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, just as the house of Ahab had done, for he had the daughter of Ahab as a wife; and he did evil in the sight of the Lord. 7 Yet the Lord would not destroy the house of David, because of the covenant that He had made with David, and since He had promised to give a lamp to him and to his sons forever. Again this is the fruit of his father’s compromise and alliance with Ahab. Page 5 of 32 And it seems here that his wickedness was enough for God to destroy him, yet God had made a promise to David that his lineage would carry on, and that the Messiah would come from him. God held out for the sake of that promise. However, we will still see there were terrible consequences for his sinful ways… Verse 8 now… 8 In his days Edom revolted against Judah's authority, and made a king over themselves. 9 So Jehoram went out with his officers, and all his chariots with him. And he rose by night and attacked the Edomites who had surrounded him and the captains of the chariots. 10 Thus Edom has been in revolt against Judah's authority to this day. At that time Libnah revolted against his rule, because he had forsaken the Lord God of his fathers. 11 Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah, and caused the inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit harlotry, and led Judah astray. Edom and Libnah both revolted against this wicked tyrant. They were client kingdoms, and they would bring taxes or tribute to Israel. Yet, wickedness is weakness, and those under the wicked hand of Jehoram saw opportunity to free themselves from Judah’s rule. Page 6 of 32 The scriptures here tell us, that this was directly linked to the king leading the nation into sin and idolatry. Remember last time, there was a divine protection over Judah from the surrounding enemies as Jehoshaphat led the nation in godliness. But God has lifted that protection… I don’t know if you heard the prayer over the opening pf the United States 117th congress, but it is chilling, and it might be a tell, that we are no longer one nation under God. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri Democrat, ended his prayer “in the name of the monotheistic god,” then added what sounded like “Brahma,”(a demonic Hindu god, there creator god) before finishing with “and god known by many names by many different faiths. Amen and a-woman.” Amen is the Latin for so-be-it, so A-woman does not mean anything. I heard a pastor say this week, if you say A-woman instead of Amen, you are A-Moron. But clearly darkness is sweeping over this nation, as its leaders are leaving the God that this nation was established under. As we see here, war is a marker of a nation walking away from the will of God. Page 7 of 32 Interesting that there was no new wars fought in the last 4 years, you can do with that information what you want, but I wonder what is ahead for a nation that prays to Brahma instead of the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ. Look now starting at verse 12… 12 And a letter came to him from Elijah the prophet, saying, Thus says the Lord God of your father David: Because you have not walked in the ways of Jehoshaphat your father, or in the ways of Asa king of Judah, 13 but have walked in the way of the kings of Israel, and have made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to play the harlot like the harlotry of the house of Ahab, and also have killed your brothers, those of your father's household, who were better than yourself, 14 behold, the Lord will strike your people with a serious affliction — your children, your wives, and all your possessions; 15 and you will become very sick with a disease of your intestines, until your intestines come out by reason of the sickness, day by day. Now, a prominent prophet from the Books of the Kings comes into the picture here. Now, this is all interesting, because Elijah was caught up to heaven during the reign of Jehoshaphat, and we are dealing with his son here. Page 8 of 32 You see the prophet was inspired to write a letter to the future king and pronounce a judgement before the events even transpired. This is pretty incredible, we are not told how the king received the letter, but it came non-the-less. Also, remember Elijah was a prophet for the Northern Kingdom of Israel, which makes this even more incredible. But he knew the king would depart from his father and grandfather’s example, perhaps made evident by whom he married.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle
    The W.E.L.L. Stoneybrooke Christian Schools Sherry L. Worel www.sherryworel.com 2012.UTB.12 Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle I. An overview There are nearly 470 verses in our bible used to describe the form and furnishings of the Tabernacle and Temple. The bible gives a very specific plan for the building of the tabernacle. However, the temple is not outlined in detail. I Chron. 28:11‐19 does seem to indicate that the Lord gave David some sort of plan or model. The tabernacle was an ornate tent shrine that served the people of Israel for approximately 200 years until it was replaced by Solomon’s temple. This temple served as God’s home for approximately 400 years until the Babylonians destroyed it in 586 BC. When the Israelites returned from Babylon, Zerubbabel over saw the rebuilding of a much inferior temple in 520 BC. This building was damaged and repaired many times until Herod built his “renovation” in 19 BC. The Roman General, Titus destroyed this temple in 70AD. II. The Tabernacle (The Tent of Meeting or Place of Dwelling) A. Consider the New Testament perspective: Hebrews 9:9‐11, 10:1, Col. 2:17 and Revelation 15:5, 21:3 B. Moses was given a model of this meeting house by God Himself (Ex. 25:40) C. The craftsmen Bezalel and Oholiab built this ornate tent. See Ex. 25‐27, 35‐40 for all the details. 1. There was a linen fence that formed an outer courtyard. In that courtyard were two furnishings: a.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • King David's Double Recognition at Hebron According to Josephus
    RCatT XXXI/2 (2006) 269-281 © Facultat de Teologia de Catalunya KING DAVID’S DOUBLE RECOGNITION AT HEBRON ACCORDING TO JOSEPHUS Christopher BEGG 1. Introduction 2 Sam 5,1-3 and 1 Chr 11,1-3 tell a largely similar story of David’s recogni- tion as king by a group of Israelites at Hebron. Whereas this is the only such happening in Samuel, the Chronicler goes on, after an extended interlude (11,4– 12,22) dealing with other matters,1 to relate a similar such happening in 12,23- 40. Josephus too, in his Antiquitates judaicae (hereafter Ant. 7.53-60)2 narrates a two-stage pan-Israelite acclamation of David’s kingship at Hebron. In contrast to the Chronicler, however, the historian recounts the two moments of the king’s recognition back-to-back, just as his presentation of both moments evidences numerous differences vis-à-vis the biblical account(s). In this essay then I wish to focus on the Josephan version of David’s encounters with the Israelites who come to him at Hebron. More specifically, my study will address several wider questions: (1) In recounting the initial Hebron happening did Josephus draw on both (slightly different) accounts in 2 Sam 5,1-3 and 1 Chr 11,1-3 or rather did he limit himself to one of these to the exclusion of the other? (2) Can anything be ascertained about the text-form(s) of 2 Sam 5,1-3 and/or 1 Chr 11,1-3; 12,23- 40 used by Josephus? And (3) What sort of rewriting techniques has Josephus 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Kings 8 & 2 Chronicles 21 | Reaping the Harvest of Sin Eliphaz Said
    Men’s Study & Coffee | March 6, 2018 | 2 Kings, Week Eight (*notes from “Be Distinct” by Warren Wiersbe) 2 Kings 8 & 2 Chronicles 21 | Reaping the Harvest of Sin Eliphaz said some foolish things to his suffering friend Job, but he also stated some eternal principles, one of them being, “Even as I have seen, those who plow iniquity and sow trouble reap the same” (Job 4:8). Solomon repeated this truth in Proverbs 22:8, “He who sows iniquity will reap sorrow”, and the prophet Hosea put it graphically when he said, “They sow the wind, and reap the whirlwind”. Jeroboam, Omri, and Ahab had led the northern kingdom of Israel into idolatry, and Jehoram, who married a daughter of Ahab, had introduced Baal worship into the kingdom of Judah. Both kingdoms were rebellious against the Lord and polluted by idolatry, but now the day of judgment had arrived for Ahab’s dynasty, the day that the Prophet Elijah had predicted (1 Kings 21:21, 29). 1. The greatness of God. (2 Kings 8:1–6) This event likely took place before the healing of Naaman (2 Kings 5), since the king wasn’t likely to welcome a leper into the palace, and Gehazi was a leper (5:27). The author of 2 Kings doesn’t claim to follow a strict chronology, and we’re not even sure which king Gehazi was entertaining with stories about his master. Perhaps this event occurred early in the reign of King Joram. This account reminds us of the greatness of the Lord.
    [Show full text]
  • Athaliah, a Treacherous Queen: a Careful Analysis of Her Story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21
    Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 Robin Gallaher Branch School of Biblical Sciences & Bible Languages Potchefstroom Campus North-West University POTCHEFSTROOM E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 This article presents a critical look at the story of the reign of Athaliah, the only ruling queen of Israel or Judah in the biblical text. Double reference in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles shows her story’s importance and significance to the biblical writers. The largely parallel accounts read like a contemporary soap opera, for they contain murder, intrigue, harem politics, religious upheaval, and coup and counter-coup. Her story provides insights on the turbulent political climate of the ninth century BC. However, the purpose of the biblical writers is not to show Athaliah as the epitome of evil or that all women in power are evil. Opsomming Atalia, ’n verraderlike koningin: ’n noukeurige analise van haar verhaal in 2 Konings 11 en 2 Kronieke 22:10-23:21 In hierdie artikel word die verhaal van Atalia krities nagegaan. Atalia was naamlik die enigste koninging van Israel of Juda wie se regeringstyd in die Bybelteks verhaal word. Die dubbele verwysings na hierdie tyd in 2 Konings en 2 Kronieke dui op die belangrikheid en betekenis van haar verhaal vir die Bybel- skrywers. Die twee weergawes wat grotendeels parallelle weer- gawes is, lees byna soos ’n hedendaagse sepie, want hierdie verhale sluit elemente in soos moord, intrige, harempolitiek, godsdiensopstand, staatsgreep en kontrastaatsgreep.
    [Show full text]
  • Jehoram, Ahaziah & Jehu
    Israel’s Kings & Prophets: A Survey of 1 & 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles 16 – JEHORAM, AHAZIAH & JEHU (2 KINGS 8:16-10:36; 2 CHRONICLES 21:1-22:9) I. Jehoram, King of Judah (2 Kings 8:16-24; 2 Chronicles 21:1-20) A. The Wickedness of Jehoram (2 Kings 8:16-19; 2 Chronicles 21:1-7) - In the 5th year of King Jehoram of Israel, Jehoram, son of Jehoshaphat became Judah’s king. - Jehoshaphat gave his other sons gifts of gold, silver and fortified cities in Judah. - Jehoram was 32 years old when he became king and ruled over Judah for 8 years. - When Jehoram became king, he had his brothers killed with the sword. - He did evil in the sight of the Lord because he walked in the ways of Ahab, king of Israel. - This was because he was married to the daughter of Ahab. - In spite of this, the Lord would not destroy Judah because of his promise to David. B. The Revolt of Edom and Libnah (2 Kings 8:20-22; 2 Chronicles 21:8-11) - During the days of Jehoram, Edom revolted against Judah and made themselves a king. - Jehoram went to Edom with his army, where he was surrounded by the Edom. - This forced Jehoram to flee back to Jerusalem. - The writer notes that Edom has since been in rebellion and Libnah also rebelled against Judah. - These rebellions took place because Jehoram had forsaken the God of his fathers. - Jehoram also made high places in Judah and led the kingdom to commit harlotry.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus Writings Outline
    THE WARS OF THE JEWS OR THE HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM – BOOK I CONTAINING FROM THE TAKING OF JERUSALEM BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES TO THE DEATH OF HEROD THE GREAT. (THE INTERVAL OF 177 YEARS) CHAPTER 1: HOW THE CITY JERUSALEM WAS TAKEN, AND THE TEMPLE PILLAGED [BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES]; AS ALSO CONCERNING THE ACTIONS OF THE MACCABEES, MATTHIAS AND JUDAS; AND CONCERNING THE DEATH OF JUDAS. CHAPTER 2: CONCERNING THE SUCCESSORS OF JUDAS; WHO WERE JONATHAN AND SIMON, AND JOHN HYRCANUS? CHAPTER 3: HOW ARISTOBULUS WAS THE FIRST THAT PUT A DIADEM ABOUT HIS HEAD; AND AFTER HE HAD PUT HIS MOTHER AND BROTHER TO DEATH, DIED HIMSELF, WHEN HE HAD REIGNED NO MORE THAN A YEAR. CHAPTER 4: WHAT ACTIONS WERE DONE BY ALEXANDER JANNEUS, WHO REIGNED TWENTY- SEVEN YEARS. CHAPTER 5: ALEXANDRA REIGNS NINE YEARS, DURING WHICH TIME THE PHARISEES WERE THE REAL RULERS OF THE NATION. CHAPTER 6: WHEN HYRCANUS WHO WAS ALEXANDER'S HEIR, RECEDED FROM HIS CLAIM TO THE CROWN ARISTOBULUS IS MADE KING; AND AFTERWARD THE SAME HYRCANUS BY THE MEANS OF ANTIPATER; IS BROUGHT BACK BY ABETAS. AT LAST POMPEY IS MADE THE ARBITRATOR OF THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE BROTHERS. CHAPTER 7: HOW POMPEY HAD THE CITY OF JERUSALEM DELIVERED UP TO HIM BUT TOOK THE TEMPLE BY FORCE. HOW HE WENT INTO THE HOLY OF HOLIES; AS ALSO WHAT WERE HIS OTHER EXPLOITS IN JUDEA. CHAPTER 8: ALEXANDER, THE SON OF ARISTOBULUS, WHO RAN AWAY FROM POMPEY, MAKES AN EXPEDITION AGAINST HYRCANUS; BUT BEING OVERCOME BY GABINIUS HE DELIVERS UP THE FORTRESSES TO HIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs by Daniel D
    Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs by Daniel D. Stuhlman BHL, BA, MS LS, MHL In support of the Doctor of Hebrew Literature degree Jewish University of America Skokie, IL 2004 Page 1 Abstract Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs By Daniel D. Stuhlman, BA, BHL, MS LS, MHL Because of the differences in alphabets, entering Hebrew names and words in English works has always been a challenge. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) is the source for many names both in American, Jewish and European society. This work examines given names, starting with theophoric names in the Bible, then continues with other names from the Bible and contemporary sources. The list of theophoric names is comprehensive. The other names are chosen from library catalogs and the personal records of the author. Hebrew names present challenges because of the variety of pronunciations. The same name is transliterated differently for a writer in Yiddish and Hebrew, but Yiddish names are not covered in this document. Family names are included only as they relate to the study of given names. One chapter deals with why Jacob and Joseph start with “J.” Transliteration tables from many sources are included for comparison purposes. Because parents may give any name they desire, there can be no absolute rules for using Hebrew names in English (or Latin character) library catalogs. When the cataloger can not find the Latin letter version of a name that the author prefers, the cataloger uses the rules for systematic Romanization. Through the use of rules and the understanding of the history of orthography, a library research can find the materials needed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kings of Judah Jehoram: a Writing from Elijah 2 Chronicles 21:12-20 Lesson III Written: February 18 1990
    The Kings of Judah Jehoram: A Writing From Elijah 2 Chronicles 21:12-20 Lesson III Written: February 18 1990 5. 2 CHRONICLES 21: 12-13 A WRITING FROM ELIJAH. Verse 12 And there came a writing to him from Elijah the prophet, saying, Thus saith the LORD God of David thy father, Because thou hast not walked in the ways of Jehoshaphat thy father, nor in the ways of Asa king of Judah, Verse 13 But hast walked in the way of the kings of Israel, and hast made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to go a whoring, like to the whoredoms of the house of Ahab, and also hast slain thy brethren of thy father's house, which were better than thyself: 2 Chronicles 21:12-13 1 The writer is Elijah. As we stated last week, Elijah was no longer on earth when this letter was read. It was written by Elijah and written to be read AFTER Elijah was gone. First Lesson. Even though he was no longer on the earth, Elijah's work was not finished at the time of his departure. We learn from the New Testament that rewards will be given when the Lord returns. Revelation 22:12 And why is this? Because what we do in our life-time will either be producing good fruit or bad fruit until the Lord comes. And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. Revelation 22:12 To Illustrate. I believe that because we are still being helped by the writings of Isaac Watts, C.H.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Chronicles
    YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE 2 Chronicles BOB UTLEY PROFESSOR OF HERMENEUTICS (BIBLE INTERPRETATION) STUDY GUIDE COMMENTARY SERIES OLD TESTAMENT VOL. 7B BIBLE LESSONS INTERNATIONAL MARSHALL, TEXAS 2017 INTRODUCTION TO 1 AND 2 CHRONICLES I. NAME OF THE BOOK A. The name of the book in Hebrew is “the words (events) of the days (years).” This is used in the sense of “a chronicle of the years.” These same words occur in the title of several books mentioned as written sources in 1 Kings 14:19,29; 15:7,23,31; 16:5,14,20,27; 22:46. The phrase itself is used over thirty times in 1 and 2 Kings and is usually translated “chronicles.” B. The LXX entitled it “the things omitted (concerning the Kings of Judah).” This implies that Chronicles is to Samuel and Kings what the Gospel of John is to the Synoptic Gospels. See How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth, by Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, pp. 127-148. As the Gospel writers under inspiration (see Special Topic: Inspiration) had the right to select, adapt, and arrange the life of Jesus (not invent actions or words), so too, the inspired authors of OT narratives (see Expository Hermeneutics: An Introduction, by Elliott E. Johnson, p. 169). This selection, adaptation, and chronological/thematic arrangement of words/events was to convey theological truth. History is used as a servant of theology. Chronicles has suffered, much as the Gospel of Mark did. They were both seen as “Readers Digest” summaries and not “a full history.” This is unfortunate! Both have an inspired message.
    [Show full text]
  • Judea/Israel Under the Greek Empires." Israel and Empire: a Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism
    "Judea/Israel under the Greek Empires." Israel and Empire: A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism. Perdue, Leo G., and Warren Carter.Baker, Coleman A., eds. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015. 129–216. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 30 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567669797.ch-005>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 30 September 2021, 15:32 UTC. Copyright © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 5 Judea/Israel under the Greek Empires* In 33130 BCE, by military victory, the Macedonian Alexander ended the Persian Empire. He defeated the Persian king Darius at Gaugamela, advanced to a welcoming Babylon, and progressed to Persepolis where he burned Xerxes palace supposedly in retaliation for Persias invasions of Greece some 150 years previously (Diodorus 17.72.1-6). Thus one empire gave way to another by a different name. So began the Greek empires that dominated Judea/Israel for the next two hundred or so years, the focus of this chapter. Is a postcolonial discussion of these empires possible and what might it highlight? Considerable dif�culties stand in the way. One is the weight of conventional analyses and disciplinary practices which have framed the discourse with emphases on the various roles of the great men, the ruling state, military battles, and Greek settlers, and have paid relatively little regard to the dynamics of imperial power from the perspectives of native inhabitants, the impact on peasants and land, and poverty among non-elites, let alone any reciprocal impact between colonizers and colon- ized.
    [Show full text]