DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mississippi Kite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE MISSISSIPPI KITE Vol. 9 (2) December 1979 THE MISSISSIPPI KITE 27 A Periodical Published by the Mississippi Ornithological Society to Record and Further the Study of Mississippi Birdlife. Vol. 9, No. 2 December 1979 Contents FOOD OF NESTLING LITTLE BLUE HERONS IN AN UPLAND MISSISSIPPI HERONRY 28 David F. Werschkul RHYTHMIC FEEDING PATTERNS AMONG HOUSE SPARROWS James N. Sappington 31 A NEST RECORD FOR THE AMERICAN GOLDFINCH IN MISSISSIPPI 35 Randall C. Warren and George A. Hurst A CASE OF MISIDENTIFICATION AND COMMENTS ON THE VALUE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDS Jerome A. Jackson 36 AN UNUSUAL INSTANCE OF MORTALITY IN THE BARN SWALLOW Ren Lohoefener 38 FIRST RECORD OF THE BRIDLED TERN IN MISSISSIPPI Martha B. Hays 39 BRIDLED TERN: FIRST OBSERVATION OF A LIVE BIRD IN MISSISSIPPI 40 Larry Gates and Terrie Fairley BLUE-FACED BOOBY NEAR HORN ISLAND, MISSISSIPPI 42 C. Dwight Cooley, Jerome A. Jackson, and Donald K. Cavin BIRDS AROUND THE STATE: JUNE AND JULY 1979 43 Compiled by Jerome A. Jackson REVIEWS 46 Front Cover: A Clapper Rail at its nest at the Dupont Plant near Delisle, Mississippi, 15 May 1978. Photo by Jerome A. Jackson. 28 THE MISSISSIPPI KITE Food of tiestling Little Blue Herons J..rl an Upland Missi~ Heronry David F. Werschkul Department of Biological Sciences Mississippi State University 1 Mis~issippi State, Mississippi 39762 I studied the reproductive biology and ecology of the Little Blue Heron (Florida caerulea) in a heronry located near Brooksville, Missis­ sippi (33 0 lO'N 87 0 45'W). For information on heronry structure, history, and species composition see Werschku1 (1977a). During the 1977 breeding season I collected and analyzed regurgitated food pellets from nestling birds. The caloric content was measured as follows: (1) samples by separating food pellets into identifiable components; (2) dry weight by desiccating at 103 0 C for 72 h; (3) ash free dry weight (AFDW) by com­ bustion at 550 0 C for 6 h; and (4) energy content by combustion in a Paar Adiabiatic Bomb Calorimeter Model 1214T~. All analyses were done in triplicate. Accuracy was such that the variation among triplicates for net energy content was within 1.5% of the mean. Herein I report my findings. I collected 30 pellets by walking through the heronry and picking up pellets regurgitated by juveniles. Juveniles between the ages of 11 and 25 days readily regurgitate when alarmed. Of the 30 pellets 13 were not appreciably digested, were intact, and probably represented the entire last feeding. These 13 intact food pellets averaged 14.33 g (50=3.57). I observed juveniles to be fed about 5 times per day between the ages of 11 and 21 days so their average intake would ge 71.65 g. The net caloric content of this food was 101.26 Kjoules g- AFDW. The diet of nestling Little Blue Herons consisted primarily of fish, crayfish, and amphibians (Table 1). Fish, primarily Lepomis spp., were the most common prey item in both quantity and volume. Amphibians were the least common. Amphibians were, however, the food source with the highest caloric value (106.69 Kjoules g-l AFDW) followed by fish (101.25 Kjou1es g-l AFDW), and crayfish (99.58 Kjoules g-l AFDW). Preyavail­ ability and abundance must override caloric content in shaping the search image of Little Blue Herons. Jenni (1969) found, by volume, the diet of Little Blue Herons in north Florida to be 54% amphibian, 33% fish, and 12% invertebrate. Mean1ey (1955), although he did not report food by volume, also found amphibians to be the most common large prey. Amphibians were in 26% of the pellets he examined. They were followed in frequency by crayfish, found in 24% of the pellets, and fish, found in 14% of the pellets. The lesser· frequency of amphibians from nestlings at Brooksville is puzzling 1present address: 306 Wharf, Rural Delivery, Brookings, OR 97415. Table 1. Food of nestling Little Blue Herons. Phyla Class Species # items (%) Volume (%) Length ± 1 SD in ml (cm) Chordata Amphibia Rana catesbeiana 2 (2) 19 (6) 6.3 ± 1.8 Rana sp. 6 (5) 14 (4) 4.3 ± 0.8 <: Amphibia subtotals 8 (7) 33 (10) 0 Teleostomi Gambusia affinis 9 (7) 12 (4) 4.1 ± 0.6 <.D --- N Esox americanus 3 (3) 8 (2) 11.0 ± 1.8 0 CD (") Fundulus notti 3 (3) 4 (1) 4.8 ± 0.3 :;CD r:r CD Elassoma zona tum 6 (5) 3 (1) 2.3 ± 1.4 , <.D Amia calva (1) 5 (2) 9.5 'J ----- <.D Lepomis spp.* 59 (49) 154 (47) 4.3 ± 1.4 unidentified 2 (2) 4 (1) Teleostomi subtotals 83 (69) 190 (58) Arthropoda Crustacea Pomifelis sp. 3 (3) 2 (1) 3.5 ± 0.5 unidentified crayfish** 27 (22) 102 (31) 7.6 ± 1.8 Crustacea subtotals 30 (25) 104 (32) N * includes L. macrochi rus , ~ cyanellus, ~ marginatus; ** includes Procambaras, Cambaras. <.D ----------------------------------- 30 THE MISSISSIPPI KITE since the habitat of the 3 studies is similar. The solution is probably prey availability. During 1977 little rain fell in the Brooksville area during the nesting season (Werschkul 1977b) and amphibian populations, many dependent on temporary pools for breeding, were low (R. Altig pers. comm.). I thank Drs. R. Altig and G. Clemmer for help in identification of prey items. The study was supported in part by funds from the Frank M. Chapman Memorial Fund of the American Museum of Natural History and the Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid Program. Dr. Jerome Jackson provided helpful comments on an early draft of this manuscript. Literature Clted Jenni, D.A. 1969. A study of the ecology of four species of herons during the breeding season at Lake Alice Alachua County, Florida. Ecol. Monogr. 39:245-270. Meanley, B. 1955. A nesting study of the Little Blue Heron in eastern Arkansas. Wilson Bull. 67:84-99. Werschkul, D.F. 1977a. Present status of the Cliftonville heronry. Mississippi Kite 7:36-39. 1977b. Interactions between Cattle Egrets, Bubulcus ibis, and ----Little Blue Herons, Florida caerulea, during the breeding season. Ph.D. Thesis, MissisSlippi State Uni\lersity. Vol. 9(2), December 1979 31 Rhythmic Feeding Patterns Among House Sparrows James N. Sappington Department of Biology William Carey College Hattiesburg, Mississippi Most species of birds adopt diurnal or nocturnal rhythmic patterns of behavior that are synchronized with the 24-hour solar day. Feeding rhythms have been studied in species of birds ranging from American Wi geons (Ma reca ameri cana) (Leck 1971) to House Sparrows (Passer domesticu~mmers-Smith 1963). In a 4-year study of House Sparrow breeding activities at Mississippi State University, Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, from 1972 through 1975, I observed temporal rhythmic feeding patterns of House Sparrows under natural conditions in 4 different nesting areas. During the winter months of 1972 and 1973 I studied the extent of feeding activity in adult House Sparrows. A more detailed study of the feeding of nestlings was made from 1972 through 1975. A total of 254 nests was studied. My observations included 145 days on which continuous observations were made from 05:00 to 19:00 and 32 days on which I ob­ served nests for shorter intervals. Because of the placement of nests I was able to observe from 1 to 7 nests at one time. The number of visits to the nest with food was used as a measure of feeding activity. Royama (1966) stated that feeding frequencies are far too variable to be used as a true index of food consumption per nestling, but according to Pettingill (1970), no matter how food is supplied, the individual nestlings receive approximately equal amounts during the course of a day due to automatic apportionment. Records were kept of the number of food visits for each hour of the day for each nest. Statistical analyses were performed on the UNIVAC 1106 computer at Mississippi State University. Basic statistics were obtained from these data by the first option of UNIVAR (1973 version), a basic statistics program written by D.M. Power. The second option of UNIVAR was used to rank the means in descending order by Gabriel's sum of squares simultane­ ous test procedures (SS-STP). I Llsed a probabil i ty 1eve 1 of 0.05 as the criterion for significance in all statistical analyses. The hourly rate of nestling feeding followed a similar pattern for each year and for each of the colonies. Three peak feeding periods occurred daily, late morning, mid afternoon, and late afternoon (Fig. 1). Feeding was minimal between 05:00 and 06:00 and between 18:00 and 19:00. Although the diurnal variation in feeding followed a rhythmic pattern, analysis showed significant differences among the hours of activity. Where these differences occurred is revealed by the 5S-STP analysis 32 THE MISSISSIPPI KITE (Tab1e 1). I found a mean feeding rate of 16.5 times per hour with a mean of 3.55 young per nest (Sappington 1977). Kendeigh (1952) reported a mean rate of 20 times per hour for nestling House Sparrows with 4 in the nest. Comparison of our data sets indicates that they do not differ significantly (x2 = 0.334). TABLE 1. Comparison of mean total number of hourly visits to nests made by House Sparrows feeding nestlings. Time (CST)* Number of Cases Mean SS-STP 1400-1500 293 27.1 1000-1100 297 27.0 1700-1800 298 24.4 0600-0700 295 19.9 0900-1000 298 19.7 1100-1200 296 18.7 0700-0800 296 18.6 1300-1400 299 17.8 1500-1600 295 17.6 1600-1700 297 17.5 1200-1300 294 17.4 0800-0900 294 16.9 0500-0600 300 6.3 1800-1900 205 6.3 Hour intervals are arranged in descending order of magnitude of the mean frequency at which nest1ings were fed.
Recommended publications
  • Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge BIRD LIST

    Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge BIRD LIST

    Merrritt Island National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service P.O. Box 2683 Titusville, FL 32781 http://www.fws.gov/refuge/Merritt_Island 321/861 0669 Visitor Center Merritt Island U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1 800/344 WILD National Wildlife Refuge March 2019 Bird List photo: James Lyon Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, located just Seasonal Occurrences east of Titusville, shares a common boundary with the SP - Spring - March, April, May John F. Kennedy Space Center. Its coastal location, SU - Summer - June, July, August tropic-like climate, and wide variety of habitat types FA - Fall - September, October, November contribute to Merritt Island’s diverse bird population. WN - Winter - December, January, February The Florida Ornithological Society Records Committee lists 521 species of birds statewide. To date, 359 You may see some species outside the seasons indicated species have been identified on the refuge. on this checklist. This phenomenon is quite common for many birds. However, the checklist is designed to Of special interest are breeding populations of Bald indicate the general trend of migration and seasonal Eagles, Brown Pelicans, Roseate Spoonbills, Reddish abundance for each species and, therefore, does not Egrets, and Mottled Ducks. Spectacular migrations account for unusual occurrences. of passerine birds, especially warblers, occur during spring and fall. In winter tens of thousands of Abundance Designation waterfowl may be seen. Eight species of herons and C – Common - These birds are present in large egrets are commonly observed year-round. numbers, are widespread, and should be seen if you look in the correct habitat. Tips on Birding A good field guide and binoculars provide the basic U – Uncommon - These birds are present, but because tools useful in the observation and identification of of their low numbers, behavior, habitat, or distribution, birds.
  • Mississippi Kite (Ictinia Mississippiensis)

    Mississippi Kite (Ictinia Mississippiensis)

    Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis) NMPIF level: Species Conservation Concern, Level 2 (SC2) NMPIF assessment score: 15 NM stewardship responsibility: Low National PIF status: No special status New Mexico BCRs: 16, 18, 35 Primary breeding habitat(s): Urban (southeast plains) Other habitats used: Agricultural, Middle Elevation Riparian Summary of Concern Mississippi Kite is a migratory raptor that has successfully colonized urban habitats (parks, golf courses, residential neighborhoods) in the western portion of its breeding range over the last several decades. Little is known about species ecology outside of the breeding season and, despite stable or increasing populations at the periphery of its range, it remains vulnerable due to its small population size. Associated Species Cooper’s Hawk, Ring-necked Pheasant, Mourning Dove, American Robin Distribution Mississippi Kite is erratically distributed across portions of the east and southeast, the southern Great Plains, and the southwest, west to central Arizona and south to northwest Chihuahua. It is most abundant in areas of the Gulf Coast, and in the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles. The species is a long- distance migrant, wintering in Argentina, Paraguay, and perhaps other locations in South America. In New Mexico, Mississippi Kite is most common in cites and towns of the southeast plains. It is also present in the Middle Rio Grande valley north to Corrales, and the Pecos River Valley north to Fort Sumner and possibly Puerto de Luna (Parker 1999, Parmeter et al. 2002). Ecology and Habitat Requirements Mississippi Kite occupies different habitats in different parts of its range, including mature hardwood forests in the southeast, rural woodlands in mixed and shortgrass prairie in the Great Plains, and mixed riparian woodlands in the southwest.
  • Bird Checklist for St. Johns County Florida (As of January 2019)

    Bird Checklist for St. Johns County Florida (As of January 2019)

    Bird Checklist for St. Johns County Florida (as of January 2019) DUCKS, GEESE, AND SWANS Mourning Dove Black-bellied Whistling-Duck CUCKOOS Snow Goose Yellow-billed Cuckoo Ross's Goose Black-billed Cuckoo Brant NIGHTJARS Canada Goose Common Nighthawk Mute Swan Chuck-will's-widow Tundra Swan Eastern Whip-poor-will Muscovy Duck SWIFTS Wood Duck Chimney Swift Blue-winged Teal HUMMINGBIRDS Cinnamon Teal Ruby-throated Hummingbird Northern Shoveler Rufous Hummingbird Gadwall RAILS, CRANES, and ALLIES American Wigeon King Rail Mallard Virginia Rail Mottled Duck Clapper Rail Northern Pintail Sora Green-winged Teal Common Gallinule Canvasback American Coot Redhead Purple Gallinule Ring-necked Duck Limpkin Greater Scaup Sandhill Crane Lesser Scaup Whooping Crane (2000) Common Eider SHOREBIRDS Surf Scoter Black-necked Stilt White-winged Scoter American Avocet Black Scoter American Oystercatcher Long-tailed Duck Black-bellied Plover Bufflehead American Golden-Plover Common Goldeneye Wilson's Plover Hooded Merganser Semipalmated Plover Red-breasted Merganser Piping Plover Ruddy Duck Killdeer GROUSE, QUAIL, and ALLIES Upland Sandpiper Northern Bobwhite Whimbrel Wild Turkey Long-billed Curlew GREBES Hudsonian Godwit Pied-billed Grebe Marbled Godwit Horned Grebe Ruddy Turnstone FLAMINGOS Red Knot American Flamingo (2004) Ruff PIGEONS and DOVES Stilt Sandpiper Rock Pigeon Sanderling Eurasian Collared-Dove Dunlin Common Ground-Dove Purple Sandpiper White-winged Dove Baird's Sandpiper St. Johns County is a special place for birds – celebrate it! Bird Checklist
  • Recent Occurrences of Unusually Plumaged Kingbirds (Tyrannus) in Florida: Hybrids Or Little-Noticed Natural Variants?

    Recent Occurrences of Unusually Plumaged Kingbirds (Tyrannus) in Florida: Hybrids Or Little-Noticed Natural Variants?

    Florida Field Naturalist 45(3):79-86, 2017. RECENT OCCURRENCES OF UNUSUALLY PLUMAGED KINGBIRDS (Tyrannus) IN FLORIDA: HYBRIDS OR LITTLE-NOTICED NATURAL VARIANTS? STU WILSON Sarasota, Florida Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION In the spring of 2016, two observers at two widely separated locations studied and photographed what appeared to be Gray Kingbirds (T. dominicensis) that had a highly unusual extensive yellow wash on the underparts. On 5 April 2016, experienced Florida birder Carl Goodrich (pers. comm.) noted an odd-looking kingbird on a wire in the company of two Gray Kingbirds at Fort Zachary Taylor Historic State Park (“Fort Zach”) at Key West, Monroe County, Florida. In his first view, without a binocular, the bird struck him as a Western Kingbird (T. verticalis) because of the yellow on the underparts. Later the same day, when he was able to photograph the bird and study it in more detail with a binocular, he realized it was not a Western Kingbird. Goodrich has seen “thousands of Gray Kingbirds in the Keys over the last 40 years and none were as yellow as this one” (Fig. 1A). He believes he saw the same bird a week earlier in a gumbo limbo (Bursera simaruba) at the same location in the company of a dozen Gray Kingbirds, but was not able to photograph it on that occasion. On 15 May 2016, Michelle Wilson (pers. comm.) was birding on Lust Road at Lake Apopka North Shore Restoration Area (LANSRA), Orange County, Florida, part of the Lake Apopka Wildlife Drive. There she photographed a kingbird (Fig.
  • Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild

    Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild

    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Early- to Mid-Succession Birds Guild Bewick's Wren Thryomanes bewickii Blue Grosbeak Guiraca caerulea Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum Chestnut-sided Warbler Dendroica pensylvanic Dickcissel Spiza americana Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Gray Kingbird Tyrannus dominicensis Indigo Bunting Passerina cyanea Orchard Oriole Icterus spurius Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor White-eyed Vireo Vireo griseus Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus Yellow-breasted Chat Icteria virens NOTE: The Yellow-billed Cuckoo is also discussed in the Deciduous Forest Interior Birds Guild. Contributors (2005): Elizabeth Ciuzio (KYDNR), Anna Huckabee Smith (NCWRC), and Dennis Forsythe (The Citadel) Reviewed and Edited: (2012) John Kilgo (USFS), Nick Wallover (SCDNR); (2013) Lisa Smith (SCDNR) and Anna Huckabee Smith (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description All bird species in this guild belong to the taxonomic order Passeriformes (perching birds) and they are grouped in 9 different families. The Blue-winged, Chestnut-sided, Golden-winged, and Prairie Warblers are in the family Parulidae (the wood warblers). The Eastern and Gray Kingbirds are in the flycatcher family, Tyrannidae. The Blue Grosbeak, Dickcissel, and Indigo Bunting are in the family Cardinalidae. The Bewick’s Wren is in the wren family, Troglodytidae. The orchard oriole belongs to the family Icteridae. The Brown Thrasher is in the family Mimidae, the Yellow-billed Cuckoo belongs to the family Cuculidae, the Eastern Towhee is in the family Emberizidae, and the White-eyed Vireo is in the family Vireonidae. All are small Blue-winged Warbler birds and can be distinguished by song, appearance, and habitat preference.
  • Birds Versus Bats: Attack Strategies of Bat-Hunting Hawks, and the Dilution Effect of Swarming

    Birds Versus Bats: Attack Strategies of Bat-Hunting Hawks, and the Dilution Effect of Swarming

    Supplementary Information Accompanying: Birds versus bats: attack strategies of bat-hunting hawks, and the dilution effect of swarming Caroline H. Brighton1*, Lillias Zusi2, Kathryn McGowan2, Morgan Kinniry2, Laura N. Kloepper2*, Graham K. Taylor1 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK. 2Department of Biology, Saint Mary’s College, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. *Correspondence to: [email protected] This file contains: Figures S1-S2 Tables S1-S3 Supplementary References supporting Table S1 Legend for Data S1 and Code S1 Legend for Movie S1 Data S1 and Code S1 implementing the statistical analysis have been uploaded as Supporting Information. Movie S1 has been uploaded to figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11823393 Figure S1. Video frames showing examples of attacks on lone bats and the column. (A,B) Attacks on the column of bats, defined as an attack on one or more bats within a cohesive group of individuals all flying in the same general direction. (C-E) Attacks on a lone bat (circled red), defined as an attack on an individual that appeared to be flying at least 1m from the edge of the column, and typically in a different direction to the swarm. (F) If an attack occurred in a volume containing many bats, but with no coherent flight direction, then this was also categorised as an attack on a lone bat, rather than as an attack on the swarm. Figure S2 Video frames used to estimate the proportion of bats meeting the criteria for classification as lone bats.
  • Introduction to Tropical Biodiversity, October 14-22, 2019

    Introduction to Tropical Biodiversity, October 14-22, 2019

    INTRODUCTION TO TROPICAL BIODIVERSITY October 14-22, 2019 Sponsored by the Canopy Family and Naturalist Journeys Participants: Linda, Maria, Andrew, Pete, Ellen, Hsin-Chih, KC and Cathie Guest Scientists: Drs. Carol Simon and Howard Topoff Canopy Guides: Igua Jimenez, Dr. Rosa Quesada, Danilo Rodriguez and Danilo Rodriguez, Jr. Prepared by Carol Simon and Howard Topoff Our group spent four nights in the Panamanian lowlands at the Canopy Tower and another four in cloud forest at the Canopy Lodge. In very different habitats, and at different elevations, conditions were optimal for us to see a great variety of birds, butterflies and other insects and arachnids, frogs, lizards and mammals. In general we were in the field twice a day, and added several night excursions. We also visited cultural centers such as the El Valle Market, an Embera Village, the Miraflores Locks on the Panama Canal and the BioMuseo in Panama City, which celebrates Panamanian biodiversity. The trip was enhanced by almost daily lectures by our guest scientists. Geoffroy’s Tamarin, Canopy Tower, Photo by Howard Topoff Hot Lips, Canopy Tower, Photo by Howard Topoff Itinerary: October 14: Arrival and Orientation at Canopy Tower October 15: Plantation Road, Summit Gardens and local night drive October 16: Pipeline Road and BioMuseo October 17: Gatun Lake boat ride, Emberra village, Summit Ponds and Old Gamboa Road October 18: Gamboa Resort grounds, Miraflores Locks, transfer from Canopy Tower to Canopy Lodge October 19: La Mesa and Las Minas Roads, Canopy Adventure, Para Iguana
  • Gayler, Murph (2006) the Distribution, Foraging Areas and Behavior

    Gayler, Murph (2006) the Distribution, Foraging Areas and Behavior

    The Distribution, Foraging Areas and Behavior Of the Flycatcher Species at Springfield, Dominica Murph Gayler Dominica 2006 May 23rd- June 13th Gayler 1 ABSTRACT: This describes the natural history, habitat use and foraging techniques of the native flycatchers at the Springfield station on the island of Dominica. There are three species observed in this report and pictures and techniques on identifying them have been included in the paper. INTRODUCTION: Flycatchers are members of the family Tyrannidae; and are generally relatively plain looking birds. Some species have day-to-day contact with humans by nesting in buildings and other artificial structures. The birds of North, Central and South America are related to the Old World Flycatchers but are usually more robust and possess a much stronger beak than their European counterparts (Wikipedia). The flycatchers, by their name, are mostly insectivores, but their diet can also include fruit, lizards, snakes and, as I observed, an occasional crab. Flycatchers rarely spend much time on the ground foraging for food, but rather catch their food and return to a perch for safety and then gorge down their catch. The flycatchers can be found at all times during the day if you know where to look for them, but the best times are from 0500 to 0800 and 1630 to 1900. They are most active during this time of day because insects, the staple of their diet, are most active during this time as well. Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Aves Order: Passeriformes Family: Tyrannidae Gayler 2 STUDY AREA: The flycatchers were all seen on land owned by the Springfield Research Center located on the southwest side of the Commonwealth of Dominica, a small West Indian island in the Caribbean.
  • The Order Falconiformes in Cuba: Status, Distribution, Migration and Conservation

    The Order Falconiformes in Cuba: Status, Distribution, Migration and Conservation

    Chancellor, R. D. & B.-U. Meyburg eds. 2004 Raptors Worldwide WWGBP/MME The order Falconiformes in Cuba: status, distribution, migration and conservation Freddy Rodriguez Santana INTRODUCTION Fifteen species of raptors have been reported in Cuba including residents, migrants, transients, vagrants and one endemic species, Gundlach's Hawk. As a rule, studies on the biology, ecology and migration as well as conservation and management actions of these species have yet to be carried out. Since the XVI century, the Cuban archipelago has lost its natural forests gradually to nearly 14 % of the total area in 1959 (CIGEA 2000). Today, Cuba has 20 % of its territory covered by forests (CIGEA op. cit) and one of the main objectives of the Cuban environmental laws is to protect important areas for biodiversity as well as threatened, migratory, commercial and endemic species. Nevertheless, the absence of raptor studies, poor implementation of the laws, insufficient environmental education level among Cuban citizens and the bad economic situation since the 1990s continue to threaten the population of raptors and their habitats. As a result, the endemic Gundlach's Hawk is endangered, the resident Hook-billed Kite is almost extirpated from the archipelago, and the resident race of the Sharp-shinned Hawk is also endangered. Studies on these species, as well as conservation and management plans based on sound biological data, are needed for the preservation of these and the habitats upon which they depend. I offer an overview of the status, distribution, threats, migration and conservation of Cuba's Falconiformes. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the status and distribution of the Falconiformes in Cuba, I reviewed the latest published literature available as well as my own published and unpublished data.
  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Merritt Island CHECKLIST

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Merritt Island CHECKLIST

    SP SU FA WN STATUS SP SU FA WN STATUS SP SU FA WN STATUS SP SU FA WN STATUS SP SU FA WN STATUS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers Nightjars (Goatsuckers) Larks Nashville Warbler R R Dark-eyed Junco 1977 Black-legged Kittiwake R R Common Nighthawk * C C U Horned Lark 1994 Northern Parula * C U C R Lapland Longspur 1988 Merritt Island Sabine's Gull 2009 Chuck-will's-widow * C C O Yellow Warbler U U R Snow Bunting 1999 National Wildlife Refuge Swallows and Martins Bonaparte's Gull 0 U U Whip-poor-will R R Chestnut-sided Warbler O 0 Titusville, Florida Purple Martin * U U R Black-headed Gull 2008 Magnolia Warbler 0 0 Cardinals, Grosbeaks, Buntings, and Allies Swifts Tree Swallow C R C C Laughing Gull* C C C C Cape May Warbler U O Summer Tanager OOO Chimney Swift U U U Northern Rough-winged Swallow U R U Franklin's Gull 2003 Black-throated Blue Warbler U U Scarlet Tanager O O Bank Swallow O O Northern Cardinal * C C C C Ring-billed Gull C R C C Hummingbirds Yellow-rumped Warbler C C C Herring Gull U R U U Ruby-throated Hummingbird U U U R Cliff Swallow O O Black-throated Green Warbler O OO Rose-breasted Grosbeak O O Lesser Black-backed Gull U U U Barn Swallow C 0 C Townsend's Warbler 2002 Blue Grosbeak * OOO Kingfishers Indigo Bunting* U U U Glaucous Gull 1991 Chickadees and Titmice Blackbumian Warbler O O Great Black-backed Gull U 0 U U Belted Kingfisher* C R C C Yellow-throated Warbler U U U Painted Bunting * U O U U Carolina Chickadee 1976 Dickcissel R R R Brown Noddy R R Woodpeckers and Allies Tufted Titmouse * U U
  • The Kites of the Genus Ictinia

    The Kites of the Genus Ictinia

    THE WILSON BULLETIN A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY Published by the Wilson Ornithological Club MARCH, 1944 THE KITES OF THE GENUS ICTINIA BY GEORGE MIKSCH SUTTON RE the Mississippi Kite and Plumbeous Kite distinct species,or are A they geographical races of the same bird? Twenty years ago, when I first compared specimens of the two forms, I was so impressed with certain differences between them that it did not occur to me to question the judgment of those who had accorded them full’ specific rank. At that time I had not seen either in life, had not examined either eggs or young birds, and did not know enough about taxonomy to be concerned with the validity of such phylogenetic concepts as might be embodied in, or proclaimed by, their scientific names, Today I am much better acquainted with these two kites. I have spent weeks on end with the former in western Oklahoma (Sutton, 1939:41-53) and have encountered the latter briefly in southwestern Tamaulipas, at the northern edge of its range (Sutton and Pettingill, 1942: 8). I have handled the skins in several of our museums and am convinced that neither form has a single morphological character wholly its own. I have made a point of observing both birds critically in life, have heard their cries, noted carefully the colors of their fleshy parts, painted them from freshly killed specimens, skinned them, and examined their stomach contents. All this, together with what I have learned from the literature concerning the distribution and nesting habits of the Plumbeous Kite, convinces me that the two birds are conspecific.
  • A Microscopic Analysis of the Plumulaceous Feather Characteristics of Accipitriformes with Exploration of Spectrophotometry to Supplement Feather Identification

    A Microscopic Analysis of the Plumulaceous Feather Characteristics of Accipitriformes with Exploration of Spectrophotometry to Supplement Feather Identification

    A MICROSCOPIC ANALYSIS OF THE PLUMULACEOUS FEATHER CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIPITRIFORMES WITH EXPLORATION OF SPECTROPHOTOMETRY TO SUPPLEMENT FEATHER IDENTIFICATION by Charles Coddington A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Biology Committee: __________________________________________ Dr. Larry Rockwood, Thesis Director __________________________________________ Dr. David Luther, Committee Member __________________________________________ Dr. Carla J. Dove, Committee Member __________________________________________ Dr. Ancha Baranova, Committee Member __________________________________________ Dr. Iosif Vaisman, Director, School of Systems Biology __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Fox, Associate Dean, Office of Student Affairs & Special Programs, College of Science __________________________________________ Dr. Peggy Agouris, Dean, College of Science Date: _____________________________________ Summer Semester 2018 George Mason University Fairfax, VA A Microscopic Analysis of the Plumulaceous Feather Characteristics of Accipitriformes with Exploration of Spectrophotometry to Supplement Feather Identification A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at George Mason University by Charles Coddington Bachelor of Arts Connecticut College 2013 Director: Larry Rockwood, Professor/Chair Department of Biology Summer Semester 2019 George Mason University Fairfax, VA