DOCSLIB.ORG

Ten Year Review Advisory Group Meeting Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ten Year Review Advisory Group Meeting Presentation Suffolk County Shellfish Aquaculture Lease Program in Peconic Bay & Gardiners Bay Steven Bellone County Executive Department of Economic Development and Planning Ten Year Review Advisory Group Meeting August 20, 2020 Lease Program Authorization – Chapter 425, Laws of New York… 09/14/04 – ECL, Art. 13, Title 3 § 13-0302 • NYS ceded 110,000 acres of underwater lands in Peconic and Gardiners Bays to Suffolk County for the purpose of shellfish cultivation. • Suffolk County has authority to adopt and implement a shellfish cultivation lease program. Lease Program Authorization • Local Law No. 25-2009 • Chapter 475,Article II of the Suffolk County Code – Formally established program requirements and administrative procedures. – Adopted the 29,969 ac. Shellfish Cultivation Zone. Ten Year Review Project • Capital Project No. 7180.110 • Required per Suffolk County Code/ Administrative Guidance. • Review, revise and map updates to Shellfish Cultivation Zone. • Review and recommend revisions to limits on lease issuance and administrative procedures. • Suffolk County Legislature must adopt all changes. Ten Year Review Advisory Group • Director of Planning, Chairperson • US Army Corps of Engineers • Department of Economic Development • Town of East Hampton and Planning • S.C. Legislators from Districts 1 & 2 • Town of Riverhead • Member of the New York State Senate, • Town of Shelter Island District 1 • Member of the New York State Assembly, • Town of Southampton Assembly District 1 • Town of Southold • NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Division of Marine • East Hampton Trustee Resources • Southampton Trustee • US Coast Guard, Sector Long Island Sound, Aids to Navigation Team Moriches • Southold Trustee Ten Year Review Advisory Group • Long Island Oyster Growers Assoc. • East End Town Baymen's Assoc. • Yachting or Sailing Assoc. Rep. • Peconic Estuary Program • Association of Marine Industries • Long Island Farm Bureau • Suffolk County Aquaculture Lease • Cornell Cooperative Extension, Program lessee seaweed specialist • Peconic Baykeeper Role of Advisory Group • Advise the Department of Economic Development and Planning on changes to the Suffolk County Shellfish Aquaculture Lease Program. • Seek the input, views and concerns of local government, stakeholder user groups and the public during this process. Ten Year Review Advisory Group Advisory Group meetings held to date: • Meeting No. 1: November 14, 2018 • Meeting No. 2: April 18, 2019 • Meeting No. 3: June 27, 2019 • Meeting No. 4: November 20, 2019 • Meeting No. 5: May 28, 2020 • Meeting No. 6: August 20, 2020 Ten Year Review Project • Review, revise and map updates to Shellfish Cultivation Zone. • Review and recommend revisions to limits on lease issuance and administrative procedures. • Suffolk County Legislature must adopt all changes. Status of Lease Issuance • Total # of Leases: – 59 leases on a total of 820 acres – One 20-acre lease on a private oyster grant is pending • Acreage available from 600 ac. Lease Cap Limit: – 110 acres available for leasing • Lease Status: – 30 Permitted/leases under cultivation – 17 Permits pending/Applying for permits – Six Notice of Default letters sent – Nine Terminations in process • 80 acres returned to the Cap Updates to Administrative Guidance Document Updates to Administrative Guidance Document Administrative Guidance Document Administrative Guidance Document Updates • Definitions • Chapter 1. Lease Application and Execution Process – Eligibility for Shellfish Aquaculture Leases – Number of Leases Permitted – Establishment of Application Priority – Lease Area Boundary Survey – Lease Execution Administrative Guidance Document Definitions Revised Definitions New Definitions • Aquaculture • Expansion of Lease • Department • Floating Shellfish Gear • Equipment • Seaweed Cultivation • Sensitive Area • Lease Area Boundary Survey • Substantial Shellfish Aquaculture Activity Administrative Guidance Document Chapter 1. Lease Application and Execution Process Eligibility for Shellfish Aquaculture Leases Criteria Established 2009 Additional Criteria Proposed 2020 Lease applicants shall: Lease applicants must meet a minimum of • 18 years of age three of the following: • Not convicted of significant or • Resident of New York State repeated criminal or • Course of study in shellfish aquaculture, administrative violations of marine science, or related disciplines; the Environmental technical training program. Conservation Law • Prior shellfish aquaculture experience (three years or more) • Submission of Shellfish Cultivation Plan • Submission of Aquaculture Business Plan • Prior experience as commercial baymen or shellfishman (three years or more) Administrative Guidance Document Chapter 1. Lease Application and Execution Process Number of Leases Permitted Criteria Established 2009 Proposed 2020 Revisions • Leaseholders are limited to two • Leaseholders are limited to two leases at leases at any one time. any one time. • Separate applications must be • Leaseholders may only apply for a submitted for each lease. second lease or expansion of lease if they • Applications for second meet the eligibility requirements for leases/expansion of lease may be expansion/second lease. considered by the Dept. Only if • Utilize unallocated acreage from 2009 there is lease acreage available Annual Acreage Cap. after all other initial applications requests have been satisfied. Administrative Guidance Document Chapter 1. Lease Application and Execution Process Proposed 2020 Revisions • Establishment of Application Priority • - Will occur before the public notice is issued • Lease Area Boundary Survey – Lease Applicants will be responsible for procuring and paying for the cost of their lease site boundary survey • Submission of Lease Site Boundary Survey Maps – Established timeframe for survey map submission by applicant • Lease Execution – Established timeframe for applicant to sign lease document Administrative Guidance Document Administrative Guidance Document Updates • Chapter 2. Lease Requirements and Procedure – Lease Program Fees – Marking requirement; lease boundary and gear – Expansion of Lease/Second Lease – Subleasing will not be permitted – Substantial Shellfish Cultivation – Lease Termination/Non-renewal by the County – Lease Renewal Proposed 2020 Revised Fee Schedule Non-Commercial Lease Commercial Lease Lease Application Fee: $150 (non-refundable) $150 (non-refundable) Annual Lease Rental Fee: Years 1 thru 3: $100 per 10-acre lease -$250 per 10-acre lease -$100 per 10-acre lease for United States Veterans in Suffolk County -$500 per 10-acre lease for individuals or entities who are not residents of Suffolk County Years 4 and 5: $200 per 10-acre lease -$500 per 10-acre lease -$200 per 10-acre lease for United States Veterans in Suffolk County -$1,000 per 10-acre lease for individuals or entities not residents of Suffolk County Years 6 thru 10: -$750 per 10-acre lease $300 per 10-acre lease -$300 per 10-acre lease for United States Veterans in Suffolk County -$1,500 per 10-acre lease for individuals or entities not residents of Suffolk County Administrative Guidance Document Updates Chapter 2. Lease Requirements and Procedures 2. Lease Site Boundary and Equipment Marking Requirements – All leaseholders are required to set buoy markers in the four corners (if applicable) of their lease area. – Buoy markers should be a minimum of 36" in height; and are required to have a daytime visibility range of one nautical mile and be radar reflective for night time and low visibility navigation. – Additionally buoys should be marked with the SCALP Lease Site and #NYSDEC off-bottom culture permit #. – Leaseholders will be required apply for and obtain Private Aids to Navigation permit from the US Coast Guard. – Equipment/gear buoys will be at the discretion of the lessee, unless required by law. – Gear buoys must be permanently marked with the lessee's name, SCALP Lease site # and NYSDEC off-bottom culture permit #. Administrative Guidance Document • Chapter 2. Lease Requirements and Procedure – Established timeframe to submit regulatory permit applications to respective federal and state agencies; lack of compliance subject to termination. – Submission by leaseholder of permit applications and issued permits. – As required, leaseholders must continue to meet required Substantial Shellfish Aquaculture Activity to be considered “active”. • A lease will be considered not to have substantial shellfish aquaculture activity if lease activity as defined in the revised Administrative Guidance is not documented for two consecutive years. Administrative Guidance Document Chapter 2. Lease Requirements and Procedures Expansion of Lease/ Second Lease Criteria Established 2009 Proposed 2020 • Applicable to former Existing leaseholders must meet eligibility TMAUAs and Private Oyster requirements below: Grant owners • Demonstrate Substantial Shellfish • Not convicted of significant or Aquaculture Activity repeated criminal or • Demonstrate three consecutive years of administrative violations of shellfish production/harvest the Environmental • Document investment of $5,000 - Conservation Law $7500/year. • Submission of Shellfish Cultivation Plan for additional lease area. • Not convicted of significant or repeated criminal or administrative violations of the Environmental Conservation Law Administrative Guidance Document Chapter 2. Lease Requirements and Procedures Lease Renewal – All lease renewals are considered and issued at the discretion of the County. – All leaseholders
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plan for Springs
    Plan for Springs The population per square mile in Springs is approximately two to six times higher than any other Planning Area1 in East Hampton. Similarly, the number of housing units per square mile in Springs is 1.6 to 2 times higher than all the other Planning Areas. Springs has the lowest number of seasonal homes of all the Planning Areas. Furthermore, Springs contains the largest number of vacant single and separate lots one half acre or less in size of any East Hampton Planning Area. The total potential build-out of Springs is approximately the same as the East Hampton Planning Area, which is approximately three times the area of Springs. Except for Gardiner’s Island, there is no land zoned for A5 Residence and there is little A3 and A2 zoning compared to the other hamlets. Most of the land in Springs was divided during the time immediately following World War II or earlier, into small suburban and urban lots sizes. A few large blocks of undivided land remain today including the woodlands between Red Dirt Road and Accabonac Harbor (including the Town protected Jacob Farm property); the woodlands between Gardiner’s Bay and Springs Fireplace Road (including the Blue Bay Girl Scout Camp); the wetlands and meadows surrounding Accabonac Harbor; the woodlands between Springs Fireplace Rd., Abrahams Path and Accabonac Road.; and a few farm remnants. These areas contribute greatly to the area’s biological diversity by supporting species that would otherwise be absent from such a densely developed residential area. The smaller islands of woodland vegetation located near these large blocks also helps to protect species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • US Naval Plans for War with the United Kingdom in the 1890S: a Compromise Between Pragmatism and Theory
    US Naval Plans for War with the United Kingdom in the 1890s: A Compromise between Pragmatism and Theory Michael J. Crawford En 1890, Alfred Thayer Mahan a élaboré un plan de guerre en cas d’hostilités envers les Britanniques; pour leur part, les classes du Naval War College des États-Unis ont mis sur pied des plans semblables en 1894 et 1895. Ces plans portaient notamment sur le nord-est des États-Unis et sa frontière avec le Canada. Faisant partie des premiers exercices formels de planification de mesures de guerre de la marine américaine, ces plans représentent un compromis entre la nouvelle vision stratégique de la profession navale américaine et une conception pragmatique des limites de la flotte américaine. In 1890, a small group of US naval professionals drew up plans for war in case of hostilities with the United Kingdom, and a few years later the Naval War College classes of 1894 and 1895, as their Problem in the Art of War, a new annual exercise, elaborated plans for war with the British.1 The plans that resulted from these efforts, 1 Versions of this essay were delivered at “From Enemies to Allies: An International Conference on the War of 1812 and Its Aftermath,” Annapolis, Maryland, 14 June 2013, and the 83rd annual meeting of the Society for Military History, in Ottawa, Ontario, 16 April 2016. The author thanks the commentators and audience at these conferences whose helpful comments contributed to revisions. Ronald Spector, Professors of War: The Naval War College and the Development of the Naval Profession (Newport, R.I.: Naval War College Press, 1977), 71-73; Alfred Thayer Mahan, Contingency Plan of Operations in Case of War with Great Britain, December 1890, in Letters and Papers of Alfred Thayer Mahan, edited by Robert Seager and Doris Maguire, 3 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • Peconic Estuary Program 2018 Long-Term Eel- Grass (Zostera Marina) Monitoring Program
    Peconic Estuary Program 2018 Long-Term Eel- grass (Zostera marina) Monitoring Program Progress Report 19 Submitted To: The Peconic Estuary Program Office The Suffolk County Department of Health Services Office of Ecology Submitted By: Christopher Pickerell and Stephen Schott Executive Summary The 2018 eelgrass monitoring season saw the Peconic Estuary Program Long-term Eelgrass Monitor- ing Program (PEP LTEMP) retire four former eelgrass meadows (Northwest Harbor, Orient Harbor, Southold Bay, and Three Mile Harbor) from annual monitoring. The program continued in 2018 with nine sites: Bullhead Bay (Southampton), Gardiners Bay (Shelter Island), Three Mile Harbor (East Hampton), Cedar Point (East Hampton), Orient Point (Southold), Coecles Harbor (Shelter Island), Fort Pond Bay (East Hampton), Napeague Harbor (East Hampton), and Sag Harbor Bay (East Hampton and Shelter Island). Monitoring surveys of all sites were completed during the period of the 6-20 September, 2018. The light availability and water temperature data collected at all sites allows for the monitoring of the two most important parameters for eelgrass health. Overall, the 2018 season provided adequate light to the meadows in the LTEMP. During July, 2018, all of the meadows, except Cedar Point (logger failure resulted in no data), exceeded their minimum daily requirements for both Hcomp and Hsat. The August logger deployment found that only Coecles Harbor and Three Mile Harbor failed to meet daily requirements for both Hcomp and Hsat. September is the month where light availability starts to decline due to the changing of the seasons. In 2018, none of the 9 monitoring sites met the 12.3-hours threshold for Hcomp, however most sites were close to this level.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecological Potential of Plum Island, New York
    Biodiversity and ecological potential of Plum Island, New York New York Natural Heritage Program i New York Natural Heritage Program The New York Natural Heritage Program The NY Natural Heritage Program is a partnership NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable between the NYS Department of Environmental online resources: Conservation Guides include the Conservation (NYS DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. biology, identification, habitat, and management of many Our mission is to facilitate conservation of rare animals, of New York’s rare species and natural community rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We accomplish this types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and mission by combining thorough field inventories, scientific communities in a specified area of interest. analyses, expert interpretation, and the most comprehensive NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an database on New York's distinctive biodiversity to deliver online tool for invasive species reporting and data the highest quality information for natural resource management. planning, protection, and management. In 1990, NY Natural Heritage published Ecological NY Natural Heritage was established in 1985 and is a Communities of New York State, an all inclusive contract unit housed within NYS DEC’s Division of classification of natural and human-influenced Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources. The program is communities. From 40,000-acre beech-maple mesic staffed by more than 25 scientists and specialists with forests to 40-acre maritime beech forests, sea-level salt expertise in ecology, zoology, botany, information marshes to alpine meadows, our classification quickly management, and geographic information systems. became the primary source for natural community NY Natural Heritage maintains New York’s most classification in New York and a fundamental reference comprehensive database on the status and location of for natural community classifications in the northeastern rare species and natural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of East Hampton Section VIII. Historic Resources Policy
    SECTION VIII HISTORIC RESOURCES POLICY #23 Town of East Hampton LWRP Historic Resources Policy #23 A. INTRODUCTION History shapes a community in subtle ways, colors the assumptions of community life, enriches and enlivens the sense of place for residents and visitors alike. Historic and cultural resources are the touchstones of tradition. They can be housed in museums, monuments and structures, but the real keys to continuity with the past, and the underpinnings of a viable future, are a community's awareness of its cultural history. The Inventory, Analysis and Historic Resource Policy #23 that follow are intended to promote an ethic of respect for the past, impress the need for study and quality information, and instill pride in the community's cultural and historic resources. In 1998 East Hampton Town celebrates the 350th anniversary of its founding by English settlers, the historical mainstream of present society. There have been other streams too, aboriginal settlements that date to thousands of years B.C., a heritage that left its mark in the Indian place names that abound in the community, and the wealth of archaeological sites the Town struggles to protect from pervasive development. Buildings and structures remind us of the colonial era; only the subtleties of the archaeological record and the oral history of native descendants remains to preserve aboriginal history. Since colonial times the Town has participated in several of the great tides of American history in its journey from a subsistence agricultural and fishing community to a premier coastal resort. The country's military history was acted out here beginning with the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of East Hampton Section IX. Scenic Resources Policies #24-25
    SECTION IX SCENIC RESOURCES POLICIES #24-25 Town of East Hampton LWRP Scenic Resources Policies #24-25 A. INTRODUCTION The Town of East Hampton has an extraordinary endowment of coastal scenery, vistas of the slender isthmus of Napeague stretching to Hither Hills, soft-edged coastal ponds, sinuous saltmarsh shorelines, puffs of spring shad bloom undulating over Montauk's moorlands, towering hoodoo ocean bluffs west of Montauk Point. The visual quality of the coast is part of the Town's natural wealth and its cultural heritage. Panoramic views of the water and esthetic issues are important not only because they deeply affect the way people feel about living in the community, but because scenic values play a vital part in attracting visitors, residents, and businesses to East Hampton. Certain esthetic values are deeply embedded in our culture and value systems, among them the passion for visual proximity to the water. Like people everywhere, East Hampton's residents have grown accustomed to their surroundings and tend to lose sight of the visual glory amidst their lives. Too often scenic resources are taken for granted and given short shrift until spectacular views have been marred by inappropriate development, dunescapes cluttered with boxy condominium rooflines, or the lines of dunes and bluffs broken by multi-storied homes thrust skyward for water views. With its untreed openness, the visual integrity of the Atlantic Ocean shore is easily disrupted and the most vulnerable to impairment from development. The scenery of the more wooded Peconic Estuary coast is more forgiving and in places can better conceal residential construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance Level Historic Resources Survey
    RECONNAISSANCE LEVEL HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY VILLAGE OF GREENPORT SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 2020 Prepared for the Village of Greenport by: Preservation Studios 170 Florida Street Buffalo, New York 14208 www.preservationstudios.com Prepared for: The Honorable George W. Hubbard, Mayor The Village of Greenport Historic Preservation Commission Karen Doherty, Chair The Village of Greenport 236 Third Avenue Greenport, New York 11944 Funded by: NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Certified Local Government Program Village of Greenport Thanks to: Village of Greenport The Village of Greenport Historic Preservation Commission Karen Doherty, Chair and Stephen M. Bull, former Chair Floyd Memorial Library In conjunction with: New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYSHPO) Historic Preservation Field Service Bureau Dan McEneny, Certified Local Government Coordinator Jennifer Betsworth, Historic Preservation Program Analyst, Survey and National Register Unit Prepared by: Karen A. Kennedy, M.S., Director of Architectural History Katy Stuck, M.S., RPA, Architectural Historian Joseph Duggan, Assistant Architectural Historian Preservation Studios 170 Florida Street Buffalo, New York 14208 716-725-6410 www.preservationstudios.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1-1 Fig 1.1 Village of Greenport Reconnaissance Level Historic Resources 1-4 Survey Boundary Map Fig 1.2 Long Island, showing location of Town of Southold, Suffolk. 1-5 County Department of Economic Development & Planning, Cartography and
    [Show full text]
  • NEFMC EFH Desigations
    NEFMC EFH Desigations developed as part of Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2 Amendment 14 to the Northeast Multispecies FMP Amendment 14 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP Amendment 4 to the Monkfish FMP Amendment 3 to the Atlantic Herring FMP Amendment 2 to the Red Crab FMP Amendment 2 to the Skate FMP Amendment 3 to the Atlantic Salmon FMP New England Fishery Management Council 50 Water Street, Mill 2 Newburyport, MA 01950 (978) 465-0492 tel. Essential Fish Habitat or EFH is define as those waters necessary for spawning, breeding, feeding, and growth to maturity. Regional Fishery Management Councils are required to desginate EFH per the 1996 reauthorization of the Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Regulatory guidance about EFH designations and EFH consultations was published in 2002 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service (Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 12, p 2343-2383). This guidance recommends description and identification of EFH by species and lifestage, based on the best available sources of information. Per the guidance, both text descriptions of essential habitats as well as spatial depictions of the extent of EFH should be developed. The New England Fishery Management Council developed its current EFH designations via Omnibus Habitat Amendment 2 (OHA2). OHA2 represented the first update to the NEFMC’s original EFH designations, developed in 1999 or shortly thereafter. Development of OHA2 began in 2004, and the final regulations were implemented on April 9, 2018. The EFH designations were the primary focus of the first phase of work on the amendment, from 2004- 2007, but adjustments to the desginations were made throughout the process, up until final Council action in April and June of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office
    U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Historic Light Station Information NEW YORK AMBROSE LIGHT Location: APPROACH TO NEW YORK BAY Station Established: 1823 Year Current Tower(s) First Lit: 1996 Operational: YES Automated: YES Deactivated: NO, see notes below for more detailed information Foundation Materials: STEEL PILES Construction Materials: STEEL Tower Shape: Markings/Pattern: Relationship to Other Structure Original Lens: DCB 36 Historical Information: The original Ambrose "Texas Tower" was placed in operation on 23 August 1967. The tower was automated in 1988 and was damaged beyond repair by a collision with the oil tanker Aegeo in October, 1996. The structure was then demolished and replaced with a small light tower/platform. BARBER'S POINT LIGHT (OLD) Location: Barber's Point, Lake Champlain, New York Station Authorized: 1870 Year Current Tower(s) First Lit: 1873 Operational: Automated: 1935 Deactivated: Foundation Materials: Construction Materials: Tower Shape: Markings/Pattern: Page 1 of 61 U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Relationship to Other Structure: Original Lens: Fifth-Order Fresnel Historical Information: Barber’s Point is roughly midway between Split Rock Point to the north and Crown Point to the south. This stretch of 125-mile-long Lake Champlain is quite narrow, averaging only two miles in width. Barber’s Point was thus a logical place for a ferry, and records indicate that Hezekiah Barber operated one that crossed Lake Champlain between Barber’s Point, NY and Arnold Bay (Panton), VT. The geography at Barber’s Point also made it a prime candidate for a lighthouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Triennial Review of Coliform Data Shelter Island Sound - South Shellfish Land Number 18S Towns of Southampton, East Hampton, Southold and Shelter Island 2013-2017
    TRIENNIAL REVIEW OF COLIFORM DATA SHELTER ISLAND SOUND - SOUTH SHELLFISH LAND NUMBER 18S TOWNS OF SOUTHAMPTON, EAST HAMPTON, SOUTHOLD AND SHELTER ISLAND 2013-2017 PREPARED: June 2018 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Shellfish Growing Area Classification Unit 205 N. Belle Meade Road, Suite 1 East Setauket, New York 11733 INTRODUCTION Shelter Island Sound, South (SISS), is located between the north shore of the south fork of Long Island, New York and along the entire southern shoreline of Shelter Island. It extends as far west as Jessup Neck on the south fork (SF), as north as Cedar Beach Point and Paradise Point on the north fork (NF); and as far east as Barcelona Point on the SF to Mashomack Point on Shelter Island (SI). It also runs all along the south shore of Shelter Island from Mashomack Point on the east to Crab Creek Point on the west. The area that is sampled covers portions of four towns: Southampton; East Hampton; Southold; and Shelter Island. This includes the area located north of Noyack Bay, south of Southold Bay, the area between North Haven and Shelter Island and the area south of Mashomack Point, including outer Sag Harbor. The underwater lands of Shelter Island Sound South (SISS) fall under the jurisdiction of New York State and are considered state underwater lands. This large embayment is approximately 4,725 acres. There are no areas classified as uncertified year-round or seasonally uncertified in Shelter Island Sound South. There once was a small seasonal marina closure in Smith Cove (near station 29.1).
    [Show full text]
  • BASE MAP Accurate in Any Way
    SUFFOLK COUNTY SHELLFISH AQUACULTURE LEASE PROGRAM IN PECONIC BAY AND GARDINERS BAY - TEN YEAR REVIEW . L S I M U L P LONG ISLAND SOUND BLOCK ISLAND SOUND ORIENT HARBOR LOCATOR Greenport GARDINERS ISLAND GARDINERS Dering BAY Harbor SHELTER ISLAND SOUTHOLD BAY NAPEAGUE BAY T S E R W O H B T R HOG NECK R A O H BAY North N Haven SOUTHOLD NOYACK BAY LITTLE PECONIC Sag Harbor BAY EASTHAMPTON East Hampton RIVERHEAD GREAT PECONIC BAY SOUTHAMPTON ATLANTIC OCEAN Sagaponack FLANDERS BAY ® Southampton 11-25-19 Real Property Taxmap parcel linwork used with permission of Suffolk County Real Property Tax Service Agency (R.P.T.S.A.). This rendering is a DRAFT MAP in that 1) the data displayed is an interagency or Intra agency work* produced for the purpose of identifying and correcting data. It is not a final agency determination. It is not statistical or factual compilation of data. In some cases correct data has been left Legend out and questionable or inaccurate data has been exaggerated to help identify errors. In short, this is a DRAFT MAP produced in an effort to aid in the correction of data and is not held out as being complete or hamlets-suffolk selection MAP 1: BASE MAP accurate in any way. 1000 ft HIGH WATER MARK BUFFER (AS PER NYS ECL 13-0302) *excerpted from (F.O.I.L) the provisions of the Freedom of Information Law [Public Officers Law Article SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 6 Section 84-90] by section 87.2.g LEASE PROGRAM BOUNDARY (AS PER NYS ECL 13-0302) This map is a compilation of data from: 1 inch = 4,752 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfish, Peprilus Triacanthus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-145 Essential Fish Habitat Source Document: Butterfish, Peprilus triacanthus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Region Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, Massachusetts September 1999 Recent Issues 105. Review of American Lobster (Homarus americanus) Habitat Requirements and Responses to Contaminant Exposures. By Renee Mercaldo-Allen and Catherine A. Kuropat. July 1994. v + 52 p., 29 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB96-115555. 106. Selected Living Resources, Habitat Conditions, and Human Perturbations of the Gulf of Maine: Environmental and Ecological Considerations for Fishery Management. By Richard W. Langton, John B. Pearce, and Jon A. Gibson, eds. August 1994. iv + 70 p., 2 figs., 6 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB95-270906. 107. Invertebrate Neoplasia: Initiation and Promotion Mechanisms -- Proceedings of an International Workshop, 23 June 1992, Washington, D.C. By A. Rosenfield, F.G. Kern, and B.J. Keller, comps. & eds. September 1994. v + 31 p., 8 figs., 3 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB96-164801. 108. Status of Fishery Resources off the Northeastern United States for 1994. By Conservation and Utilization Division, Northeast Fisheries Science Center. January 1995. iv + 140 p., 71 figs., 75 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB95-263414. 109. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Potential for Development of Aquaculture in Massachusetts: 15-17 February 1995, Chatham/Edgartown/Dartmouth, Massachusetts. By Carlos A. Castro and Scott J. Soares, comps. & eds. January 1996. v + 26 p., 1 fig., 2 tables. NTIS Access. No. PB97-103782. 110. Length-Length and Length-Weight Relationships for 13 Shark Species from the Western North Atlantic.
    [Show full text]