DOCSLIB.ORG

How the Closure of Paleo-Tethys and Tethys Oceans Controlled the Early Breakup of Pangaea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How the Closure of Paleo-Tethys and Tethys Oceans Controlled the Early Breakup of Pangaea How the closure of paleo-Tethys and Tethys oceans controlled the early breakup of Pangaea D. Fraser Keppie Department of Energy, Government of Nova Scotia, Joseph Howe Building, 12th Floor, 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3J9, Canada ABSTRACT fined to segments south of Newfoundland dur- Two end-member models have been invoked to accommodate the Mesozoic dispersal ing the Jurassic and early Cretaceous and did of the supercontinent Pangaea. In one end-member, the opening of the Atlantic Ocean is not extend further to the north until the late Cre- inferred to have been balanced by the closure of the Panthalassan Ocean related to subduc- taceous (Buiter and Torsvik, 2014). tion off the western margins of the Americas. In the other end-member model, the opening In this study, I investigate the processes of the Atlantic Ocean is accommodated by the closure of the paleo-Tethys and Tethys oceans responsible for the failure and dispersal of Pan- linked to subduction off the southern margins of Eurasia. Here, I re-evaluate global plate gaea by re-evaluating the global plate circuit circulation data compiled for the middle Mesozoic Era. The present evaluation confirms data compiled for the Mesozoic era (Seton et that closure of the paleo-Tethys and Tethys oceans compensated for the early opening of the al., 2012) and identifying the compensation central Atlantic and proto-Caribbean oceans. This result implies that the tectonic evolution system(s) that accommodated the early stages of the North American Cordillera was independent from the processes governing Pangaea of central Atlantic and proto-Caribbean rifting breakup in the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous Periods. As well, the opening Atlantic and (Fig. 1). By identifying explicitly the oceanic closing Tethys realm must have been tectonically connected through the Mediterranean domains that closed to accommodate the open- region in terms of a transform fault or point yet to be factored into geological interpre- ing of the Atlantic domain, it is possible to con- tations. Tight geometric and kinematic correlations evident between the opening Atlantic sider the fundamental links that existed between and closing Tethyan domains can be demonstrated, which are most readily explained if rifting and sea-floor spreading within the Pan- the forces causing Pangaea breakup were transmitted from the Tethyan domain into the gaean interior and the subduction and seafloor Atlantic domain, and not vice versa. Thus, slab sinking–based forces produced during the consumption at its peripheral margins. evolution of the Tethyan subduction zones are hypothesized to have controlled the early Two competing models of compensation Atlantic breakup of Pangaea. for the Mesozoic opening of the central Atlan- tic exist. In the Atlantic-Panthalassan model, INTRODUCTION forces imparted at subduction zones peripheral the opening of the central Atlantic and proto- Why Pangaea broke up where and when it to Pangaea provided the motivation for super- Caribbean oceans is inferred to have been bal- did remains an open question in modern tec- continent failure (Hamilton, 2007). A number of anced by subduction under the Cordilleran tonics (Nance et al., 2014). Yet, resolution of geometric and kinematic properties of Pangaea margin of North America and partial closure of these questions are central to understanding the breakup continue to be enigmatic. It is unclear the Panthalassan oceanic domain (e.g., Pindell driving mechanisms of supercontinent breakup why re-activation of the late Paleozoic sutures and Dewey, 1982; Johnston and Borel, 2007; and plate tectonic processes (Morra et al., preserved in Pangaea following the collision of Miall and Blakey, 2008; Sigloch and Mihaly- 2013; Buiter and Torsvik, 2014). Recent studies Laurentia and Gondwana were preferred over nuk, 2013). In the alternative Atlantic-Tethyan appear to favor models in which a superplume the re-activation of other structural lineaments model, the opening of the central Atlantic and in the sublithospheric mantle beneath the cen- preserved within Pangaea (Buiter and Torsvik, proto-Caribbean oceans is inferred to have been tral Atlantic provides the key drive (Nance et al., 2014). And, it is also unclear why reactivations balanced by the closure of the paleo-Tethys and 2014). An alternative possibility is that tectonic of the late Paleozoic sutures were mostly con- Tethys oceans located south of Eurasia (e.g., Figure 1. Reconstructed 125 Ma Rift Margins (MR = Mid−Ocean Ridge) paleo geography of Earth I F PTC (AMR) Atlantic (TMR) Tethys at 125 Ma (after Seton et TC (CMR) Caribbean (SMR) Somali al., 2012) with South Af- N TMR Trench Margins (C = Cordillera) rica held fixed. The com- AMR NAC (NAC) North American (PTC) Palaeo−Tethys pensation between ocean SMR (MAC) Middle American (TC) Tethys opening and closing prior CMR (SAC) South American to ca. 125 Ma is indicated Stage Poles with light and dark shaded MAC 185 175 165 155 145 135 125 End Age (Ma) polygons, respectively, in SAC Eurasia Figures 2–4. Ocean com- Neolaurentia pensation must be con- (period = 20 Ma; fixed = Neogondwana) nected via one of three Ocean Breakup Tree Time (Ma) end-member transform Compensation systems involving sinistral g Continents −225 −200 −175 −150 −125 −100 −75 −50 −25 0 Neolaurentia Eurasia transform (TS), polar trans- Closin form (T ), or dextral trans- Eurasia Paper Scope P TD form (TD) deformation. La- TP Neolaurasia Neolaurentia T Sinoria beled continental polygons S discussed in text include g Cimmeria Pangaea Neogondwana Africa Newfoundland (N), Iran (I), Openin Neogondwana and Farah (F). Simplified India+ South America Pangea breakup tree indi- cates scope of paper. GEOLOGY, April 2015; v. 43; no. 4; p. 335–338 | doi:10.1130/G36268.1 | Published online 27 February 2015 GEOLOGY© 2015 Geological | Volume Society 43 | ofNumber America. 4 Gold| www.gsapubs.org Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. 335 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/43/4/335/3548497/335.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 Collins, 2003; Kovalenko et al., 2010). The bility of west-dipping subduction off the west METHODOLOGY goal of the present study is to evaluate which of coast of North America—under Cordilleran Stage poles for the net motion of North these compensation systems governed the early terranes with a hypothetically allochthonous America (Neolaurentia) away from South Africa breakup of Pangaea. origin—has also been proposed (Moores, 1970; (Neogondwana) were calculated using 20 m.y. Complexities in the Atlantic breakup of Pan- Johnston and Borel, 2007; Sigloch and Mih- stage intervals for 10 m.y. time steps between gaea include the opening of the South Atlantic alynuk, 2013). Detrital zircon data indicate that 185 Ma and 125 Ma (squares in Fig. 1). Simi- rift at ca. 125 Ma (Seton et al., 2012), a major many of the outboard Cordilleran terranes have larly, stage poles for the net motion of Eurasia change in global tectonics at ca. 105–100 Ma a peri-Laurentian provenance by Triassic time toward South Africa were calculated (triangles (Matthews et al., 2012), and the opening of the (Colpron and Nelson, 2009), but debate persists in Fig. 1). These poles constrain how north- North Atlantic rift at ca. 90 Ma (Seton et al., on the timing, orientation, and polarity of Cor- ern Pangaea (Neolaurentia + Eurasia) moved 2012). For reasons of simplicity and space, I con- dilleran subduction zones throughout the Juras- with respect to southern Pangaea (Neogond- fine the present evaluation of the early breakup of sic and Cretaceous (Johnston and Borel, 2007; wana) before 125 Ma. The implications of Pangaea to the period of time prior to ca. 125 Ma. Miall and Blakey, 2008; Sigloch and Mihal- these motions for opening and closing oceanic However, I also do not consider the late Jurassic ynu, 2013). A few studies have suggested that domains are then illustrated by constructing breakup of southern Pangaea (or Neogondwana) Tethyan—not Panthalassan—closure compen- unshaded (ocean opening) and shaded (ocean because it can be shown that the opening of the sated for early Atlantic opening instead (e.g., closing) parallelograms for the net relative Somali rift (between Africa–South America and Collins, 2003; Kovalenko et al., 2010). motion of the major plates away from or toward Madagascar-India-Australia-etc.) took place with North-dipping subduction is conventionally one another, respectively, for given stage inter- kinematics broadly perpendicular to the Atlantic inferred along or adjacent to the southern mar- vals (Figs. 1–4). Kinematic consistency between breakup investigated here (e.g., Reeves et al., gins of Eurasia and, subsequently, Cimmeria an opening ocean domain and a closing ocean 2004; Seton et al., 2012). The scope of the pres- to accommodate the respective closures of the domain requires one of three possible transform ent paper in space and time is given in Figure 1 paleo-Tethys and then Tethys Oceans (Moores, connections: (1) a dextral-transform connection relative to a simplified Pangaea breakup tree. 1970; Collins, 2003; Gaina et al., 2013). Sea- (TD, Fig. 1), (2) a polar transform connection (TP, floor spreading in the Tethys Ocean would have Fig. 1), or (3) a sinistral-transform connection PREVIOUS WORK accommodated the transfer of Cimmeria from (TS, Fig. 1). Reconstructions of Pangaea and its Meso- East Africa to southern Europe (Golonka, 2007). In Figures 2–4, the net opening of the Atlan- zoic-to-present dispersal have been iteratively For convenience, the term Greater Tethyan tic domain and corresponding closure of Greater refined for the past 50 yr with the compilation of domain is used here to name the total oceanic Tethys was calculated for early Jurassic (203– Seton et al. (2012) used herein. Plate boundar- domain that encompassed both the paleo-Tethys 170 Ma), late Jurassic (170–145 Ma), and early ies interpreted to have accommodated Pangaea and Tethys Oceans in the Mesozoic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mesozoic Central Atlantic and Ligurian Tethys1
    42. RIFTING AND EARLY DRIFTING: MESOZOIC CENTRAL ATLANTIC AND LIGURIAN TETHYS1 Marcel Lemoine, Institut Dolomieu, 38031 Grenoble Cedex, France ABSTRACT The Leg 76 discovery of Callovian sediments lying above the oldest Atlantic oceanic crust allows us to more closely compare the Central Atlantic with the Mesozoic Ligurian Tethys. As a matter of fact, during the Late Jurassic and Ear- ly Cretaceous, both the young Central Atlantic Ocean and the Ligurian Tethys were segments of the Mesozoic Tethys Ocean lying between Laurasia and Gondwana and linked by the Gibraltar-Maghreb-Sicilia transform zone. If we as- sume that the Apulian-Adriatic continental bloc (or Adria) was then a northern promontory of Africa, then the predrift and early drift evolutions of both these oceanic segments must have been roughly the same: their kinematic evolution was governed by the east-west left-lateral motion of Gondwana (including Africa and Adria) relative to Laurasia (in- cluding North America, Iberia, and Europe), at least before the middle Cretaceous (=100 Ma). By the middle Cretaceous, opening of the North Atlantic Ocean led to a drastic change of the relative motions between Africa-Adria and Europe-Iberia. From this time on, closure of the Ligurian segment of the Tethys began, whereas the Central Atlan- tic went on spreading. In fact, field data from the Alps, Corsica, and the Apennines show evidence of a Triassic-Jurassic-Early Cretaceous paleotectonic evolution rather comparable with that of the Central Atlantic. Rifting may have been started during the Triassic (at least the late Triassic) but reached its climax in the Liassic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1219421 the Opening of Neo-Tethys and the Formation of the Khuff Passive Margin
    1219421 The Opening of Neo-Tethys and the Formation of the Khuff Passive Margin 1219421 The Opening of Neo-Tethys and the Formation of the Khuff Passive Margin *1 2 Bell, Andrew ; Spaak, Pieter (1) Shell Global Solutions International BV, Rijswijk, Netherlands. (2) Shell International Exporation and Production BV, The Hague, Netherlands. Any investigation of regional geology and palaeomagnetism in the Middle East will show that in the Permian, a series of terranes separated from Gondwana and drifted north, opening the Neo-Tethys Ocean in their wake. To the north of these terranes, the Palaeo-Tethys Ocean closed and was largely subducted. Eventually in a non-synchronous movement but largely in late Triassic and early Jurassic times, these terranes docked with the northern margin of the former Palaeo- Tethys during the Cimmerian Orogeny. The opening of the Neo-Tethys in Arabia does not follow the classic pattern of continental break-up resulting in oceanic crust. Classically we should expect thermal up-doming, followed by the onset of syn-rift deposition, frequently but not always associated with volcanism. The formation of en-echelon systems of rotated fault blocks are also characteristic, followed by a break-up unconformity and the formation of the first oceanic crust. What we see in Arabia as a consequence of the opening of Neo-Tethys exhibits few of these features. Distinguishing thermal up-doming from the uplift associated with the ‘Hercynian’ event in Arabia, coupled with the glacial sculpting of the Permo-Carboniferous Unayzah Formation is fraught with difficulty. Although locally volcanics of Permian age are known from Oman, they are absent over most of Arabia.
    [Show full text]
  • Coevolution of Global Brachiopod Palaeobiogeography and Tectonopalaeogeography During the Carboniferous Ning Li1,2*, Cheng-Wen Wang1, Pu Zong3 and Yong-Qin Mao4
    Li et al. Journal of Palaeogeography (2021) 10:18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00095-z Journal of Palaeogeography ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Coevolution of global brachiopod palaeobiogeography and tectonopalaeogeography during the Carboniferous Ning Li1,2*, Cheng-Wen Wang1, Pu Zong3 and Yong-Qin Mao4 Abstract The global brachiopod palaeobiogeography of the Mississippian is divided into three realms, six regions, and eight provinces, while that of the Pennsylvanian is divided into three realms, six regions, and nine provinces. On this basis, we examined coevolutionary relationships between brachiopod palaeobiogeography and tectonopalaeogeography using a comparative approach spanning the Carboniferous. The appearance of the Boreal Realm in the Mississippian was closely related to movements of the northern plates into middle–high latitudes. From the Mississippian to the Pennsylvanian, the palaeobiogeography of Australia transitioned from the Tethys Realm to the Gondwana Realm, which is related to the southward movement of eastern Gondwana from middle to high southern latitudes. The transition of the Yukon–Pechora area from the Tethys Realm to the Boreal Realm was associated with the northward movement of Laurussia, whose northern margin entered middle–high northern latitudes then. The formation of the six palaeobiogeographic regions of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian brachiopods was directly related to “continental barriers”, which resulted in the geographical isolation of each region. The barriers resulted from the configurations of Siberia, Gondwana, and Laurussia, which supported the Boreal, Tethys, and Gondwana realms, respectively. During the late Late Devonian–Early Mississippian, the Rheic seaway closed and North America (from Laurussia) joined with South America and Africa (from Gondwana), such that the function of “continental barriers” was strengthened and the differentiation of eastern and western regions of the Tethys Realm became more distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconstruction of Iberia Accounting for Western Tethys–North Atlantic Kinematics Since the Late-Permian–Triassic
    Solid Earth, 11, 1313–1332, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1313-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A reconstruction of Iberia accounting for Western Tethys–North Atlantic kinematics since the late-Permian–Triassic Paul Angrand1, Frédéric Mouthereau1, Emmanuel Masini2,3, and Riccardo Asti4 1Geosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), Université de Toulouse, UPS, Univ. Paul Sabatier, CNRS, IRD, 14 av. Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 2M&U sas, 38120 Saint-Égrève, France 3ISTerre, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France 4Université de Rennes, CNRS, Géosciences Rennes-UMR 6118, 35000 Rennes, France Correspondence: Paul Angrand ([email protected]) Received: 20 February 2020 – Discussion started: 6 March 2020 Revised: 12 May 2020 – Accepted: 27 May 2020 – Published: 21 July 2020 Abstract. The western European kinematic evolution results 1 Introduction from the opening of the western Neotethys and the Atlantic oceans since the late Paleozoic and the Mesozoic. Geolog- Global plate tectonic reconstructions are mostly based on the ical evidence shows that the Iberian domain recorded the knowledge and reliability of magnetic anomalies that record propagation of these two oceanic systems well and is there- age, rate, and direction of sea-floor spreading (Stampfli and fore a key to significantly advancing our understanding of Borel, 2002; Müller et al., 2008; Seton et al., 2012). Where the regional plate reconstructions. The late-Permian–Triassic these constraints are lacking or their recognition is ambigu- Iberian rift basins have accommodated extension, but this ous, kinematic reconstructions rely on the description and in- tectonic stage is often neglected in most plate kinematic terpretation of the structural, sedimentary, igneous and meta- models, leading to the overestimation of the movements be- morphic rocks of rifted margins and orogens (e.g., Handy tween Iberia and Europe during the subsequent Mesozoic et al., 2010; McQuarrie and Van Hinsbergen, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • 49. GENESIS of the TETHYS and the MEDITERRANEAN Kenneth J
    49. GENESIS OF THE TETHYS AND THE MEDITERRANEAN Kenneth J. Hsü, Geologisches Institut, ETH Zurich, Switzerland and Daniel Bernoulli, Geologisch-Palàontologisches Institut, Universitàt Basel, Switzerland ABSTRACT The Triassic Paleotethys was a wedge-like ocean opening to the east, which was totally eliminated during the early Mesozoic by subduction along the Cimmerian and Indosinian suture zone. The Tethys, s.s., was an Early Jurassic creation formed when Africa moved east relative to Europe. The sinistral movement of Africa continued until Late Cretaceous when the movement became dextral. The closing of the gap between Africa and Europe led to the Alpine orogeny and the elimination of much of the Tethys. Only the eastern Mediterranean Ionian and Levantine basins are left as possible relics of this Mesozoic ocean. The western Mediter- ranean and the Aegean are post-orogenic basins. The Balearic Ba- sin was created during late Oligocene or earliest Miocene time by rifting tectonics. The Tyrrhenian Basin was probably somewhat younger. The presence of oceanic tholeiites under its abyssal plain indicates that submarine basalt volcanism played a major role in the genesis of this basin. The Aegean Basin is probably the youngest and has undergone considerable Pliocene-Quaternary subsidence. Tectonic synthesis indicates that the Mediterranean basins, ex- cept perhaps the Aegean, were in existence and deep prior to the Messinian Salinity Crisis. FOREWORD nent Gondwana was the home of the late Paleozoic Glossopteria flora. Its inclusion in the definition of Several attempts have been made to reconstruct the Tethys seemed to imply the existence of this mediterra- tectonic history of the Tethys and its descendent, the nean during the Paleozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Facies and Environments
    The Geological Society of America Digital Map and Chart Series 17 2014 Notes on Maps of the Callovian and Tithonian Paleogeography of the Caribbean, Atlantic, and Tethyan Realms: Facies and Environments Caroline Wilhem* Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences and Environments, University of Lausanne, Geopolis, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland A. NOTE detailed in Hochard (2008). The Mesozoic reconstructions were partly presented and discussed in Flores (2009) for the Pacifi c The Callovian-Tithonian period of the Atlantic and its and Caribbean realms; in Stampfl i and Borel (2002, 2004) for connected oceans was tectonically intense. It was mainly the Atlantic realm; and in Stampfl i (2000, 2001), Stampfl i et al. marked by the opening of the Caribbean Seaway, the pursu- (2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003), Stampfl i and Borel (2004), Stamp- ance of the Atlantic and Tethyan spreading, as well as the fl i and Kozur (2006), Bagheri and Stampfl i (2008), Bonev and North Atlantic rifting. This period is characterized by a gen- Stampfl i (2008, 2011), Moix et al. (2008), and Stampfl i and eral deepening of the oceans. At the same time, the sedimen- Hochard (2009) for the Tethyan realm. tation passed from largely siliceous to carbonaceous deposits Key localities and linked references used for the elabora- within the Tethyan realm. tion of the Callovian and Tithonian maps are geographically Callovian and Tithonian facies and environments were com- presented in section B. The Dercourt et al. (1993, 2000) atlases piled and added to a plate tectonics model that constrains their were used as general references. The characteristics and devel- arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth History
    Earth History Geography 106 LRS Doug Fischer Introduction – Overview of geologic history • Plate positions over time • Major biogeographic events Earth’s tectonic history • Gondwanaland – Southern continents – Formed 650mya Precambrian • Laurasia – Northern Continents – Most converged in Devonian 400mya as “old sandstone continent” • Formation of Pangaea – Late Permian ~ 275 mya Breakup of Pangaea • Started 180 mya (early Jurassic) – Prior to breakup, great mixing of biota – However, regionalization did still occur as it does on (smaller) continents today Breakup of Laurasia • Separated Europe & N. America 100 mya • Beringia rejoined them 75 mya • Intermittent connection via Greenland & Beringia through Tertiary Breakup of Gondwanaland • 180-160mya Gondwanaland started to split – Mesozoic (Triassic/Jurassic) • Mostly finished by 90 mya 152 mya 94 mya Central America and Antilles • Caribbean Plate was sandwiched between N&S America between 80 and 20 mya • Formed ring of islands • Landbridge closed ~ 3.5 mya – Great American Interchange 14 mya Biogeographic consequences of plate tectonics • Fragmentation and dispersal of ancestral biota (vicariance) • Changing barriers and coridors – biotic interchange • Speciation and extinction – changing physical and biological conditions Tour of Geologic History The geologic time scale • Phanerozoic starts with Cambrian explosion of species with hard body parts – (Some multi- cellular algae and animals lived at the end of the Precambrian) Paleozoic Paleozoic Cambrian • Animals with hard-shells appeared in great numbers for the first time • The continents were flooded by shallow seas. • The supercontinent of Gondwana had just formed and was located near the South Pole. Ordivician • ancient oceans separated the barren continents of Laurentia, Baltica, Siberia and Gondwana. • The end of the Ordovician was one of the coldest times in Earth history.
    [Show full text]
  • Intra-Panthalassa Ocean Subduction Zones Revealed by Fossil Arcs and Mantle Structure D
    LETTERS PUBLISHED ONLINE: 26 FEBRUARY 2012 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1401 Intra-Panthalassa Ocean subduction zones revealed by fossil arcs and mantle structure D. G. van der Meer1,2*, T. H. Torsvik3,4,5,6, W. Spakman1*, D. J. J. van Hinsbergen3,6 and M. L. Amaru1,7 The vast Panthalassa Ocean once surrounded the supercon- unconstrained in the early Mesozoic Panthalassa Ocean4,11,12. tinent Pangaea. Subduction has since consumed most of the Notably, some of these terranes preserve relics of fossil Triassic and oceanic plates that formed the ocean floor, so classic plate Jurassic volcanic arc complexes that accreted many tens of millions reconstructions based on magnetic anomalies can be used of years after their extinction to circum-Pacific continents4,11,13. only to constrain the ocean’s history since the Cretaceous This shows that Triassic and Jurassic subduction zones existed away period1,2, and the Triassic–Jurassic plate tectonic evolution from continental margins in the Panthalassa Ocean. As subducted of the Panthalassa Ocean remains largely unresolved3,4. Ge- slab remnants (that is, subducted oceanic crust and lithosphere) ological clues come from extinct intra-oceanic volcanic arcs associated with these subduction zones might still reside in that formed above ancient subduction zones, but have since the lower mantle, the structure of the sub-Pacific mantle may been accreted to the North American and Asian continental provide palaeolongitudes of intra-oceanic subduction, allowing margins4. Here we compile data on the composition, the timing significant improvement of plate tectonic reconstructions of the of formation and accretion, and the present-day locations of early Mesozoic Panthalassa Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Circulation in the Toarcian (Early Jurassic)
    Ocean Circulation in the Toarcian (Early Jurassic): A Key Control on Deoxygenation and Carbon Burial on the European Shelf Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, Alexandre Pohl, Niels van Helmond, Nina Papadomanolaki, Angela Coe, Anthony Cohen, Bas van de Schootbrugge, Yannick Donnadieu, Caroline Slomp To cite this version: Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, Alexandre Pohl, Niels van Helmond, Nina Papadomanolaki, Angela Coe, et al.. Ocean Circulation in the Toarcian (Early Jurassic): A Key Control on Deoxygenation and Carbon Burial on the European Shelf. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, American Geophysical Union, 2018, 33 (9), pp.994-1012. 10.1029/2018PA003394. hal-02902799 HAL Id: hal-02902799 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02902799 Submitted on 17 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology RESEARCH ARTICLE Ocean Circulation in the Toarcian (Early Jurassic): A Key Control 10.1029/2018PA003394 on Deoxygenation and Carbon Burial on the European Shelf Key Points: • The southern European Shelf Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni1 , Alexandre Pohl2 , Niels A. G. M. van Helmond1 , Nina M. remained oxygenated during the Papadomanolaki1 , Angela L. Coe3 , Anthony S. Cohen3, Bas van de Schootbrugge1 , Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 1 • Ocean dynamics, notably the Tethyan Yannick Donnadieu , and Caroline P.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Plate Boundaries in The
    PUBLICATIONS Tectonics RESEARCH ARTICLE Reconstructing Plate Boundaries in the Jurassic 10.1002/2017TC004790 Neo-Tethys From the East and West Vardar Special Section: Ophiolites (Greece and Serbia) Orogenic cycles: from field observations to global Marco Maffione1,2 and Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen1 geodynamics 1Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Key Points: • The Jurassic Neo-Tethys ridge was N-S trending and spreading at 1–2 cm/yr causing the widespread formation of Abstract Jurassic subduction initiation in the Neo-Tethys Ocean eventually led to the collision of the detachment faults Adria-Africa and Eurasia continents and the formation of an ~6,000 km long Alpine orogen spanning • In the Middle Jurassic a N-S trending from Iberia to Iran. Reconstructing the location and geometry of the plate boundaries of the now subduction zone formed near and parallel to the Neo-Tethyan ridge disappeared Neo-Tethys during the initial moments of its closure is instrumental to perform more realistic forming the West Vardar Ophiolite plate reconstructions of this region, of ancient ocean basins in general, and on the process of subduction • In the Middle Jurassic a N-S trending initiation. Neo-Tethyan relics are preserved in an ophiolite belt distributed above the Dinaric-Hellenic subduction zone was present near fi and parallel to the Neo-Tethyan ridge fold-thrust belt. Here we provide the rst quantitative constraints on the geometry of the spreading ridges forming the West Vardar Ophiolite and trenches active in the Jurassic Neo-Tethys using a paleomagnetically based net tectonic rotation analysis of sheeted dykes and dykes from the West and East Vardar Ophiolites of Serbia (Maljen and Ibar) Supporting Information: and Greece (Othris, Pindos, Vourinos, and Guevgueli).
    [Show full text]
  • Tethyan Oceans
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Tethyan oceans Gt~RARD M. STAMPFLI Institut de GOologie et Paldontologie, UniversitO de Lausanne, BFSH2-CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Diachronous subsidence patterns of Tethyan margins since the Early Palaeozoic provide constraints for paleocontinental reconstructions and the opening of disappeared oceans. Palaeotethys opening can be placed from Ordovician to Silurian times and corresponds to the detachment of a ribbon-like Hun Superterrane along the Gondwanan margin. Neotethys opening took place from Late Carboniferous to late Early Permian from Australia to the eastern Mediterranean area. This opening corresponds to the drifting of the Cimmerian superterrane and the final closing of Palaeotethys in Middle Triassic times. Northward subduction of Palaeotethys triggered the opening of back-arc oceans along the Eurasian margin from Austria to the Pamirs. The fate of these Permo-Triassic marginal basins is quite different from areas to area. Some closed during the Eocimmerian collisional event (Karakaya, Agh-Darband), others (Meliata) stayed open and their delayed subduc- tion induced the opening of younger back-arc oceans (Vardar, Black Sea). The subduction of the Neotethys mid-ocean ridge was certainly responsible for a major change in the Jurassic plate tectonics. The Central Atlantic ocean opened in Early Jurassic time and extended eastwards into the Alpine Tethys in an attempt to link up with the Eurasian back- arc oceans. When these marginal basins started to close the Atlantic system had to find another way, and started to open southwards and northwards, slowly replacing the Tethyan ocean by mountain belts.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean and the Pangea B to Pangea a Transformation During the Permian
    GeoArabia, v. 14, no. 4, 2009, p. 17-48 Neo-Tethys opening and Pangea transformation Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain Opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean and the Pangea B to Pangea A transformation during the Permian Giovanni Muttoni, Maurizio Gaetani, Dennis V. Kent, Dario Sciunnach, Lucia Angiolini, Fabrizio Berra, Eduardo Garzanti, Massimo Mattei and Andrea Zanchi ABSTRACT We studied the stratigraphy, composition, and paleomagnetic properties of lateritic weathering profiles of Permian age from northern Iran and western Karakoram, Pakistan. A limited set of samples deemed representative yielded stable low-inclination paleomagnetic components carried essentially by hematite of chemical origin isolated in massive, fine-grained, and homogeneous ferricrete facies. These laterites originated at equatorial paleolatitudes characterized by intense weathering processes under warm and humid climatic conditions. Paleomagnetic estimates of paleolatitude from Iran, Karakoram, and north Tibet from this study and the literature, albeit sparse, provide testable constraints on the motion of the Cimmerian terranes as the result of the opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean along the eastern margin of Gondwana during the Permian. We confirm and help refine previous suggestions that the Cimmerian terranes migrated from southern Gondwanan paleolatitudes in the Early Permian to subequatorial paleolatitudes by the Middle Permian – Early Triassic. As a novel conclusion, we find that timing, rates, and geometry of Cimmerian tectonics are broadly compatible with the transformation of Pangea from an Irvingian B to a Wegenerian A-type configuration with Neo-Tethyan opening taking place contemporaneously essentially in the Permian. INTRODUCTION The Late Paleozoic – Early Mesozoic was a period of major plate tectonic reconfiguration. Gondwana and Laurasia completed Variscan assemblage into one supercontinent, Pangea, and subsequently the Neo-Tethys Ocean opened along the eastern margin of Gondwana while the Paleo-Tethys Ocean underwent subduction along the southern margin of Eurasia.
    [Show full text]