DOCSLIB.ORG

Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Miscanthus X Giganteus, Panicum Virgatum, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Miscanthus X Giganteus, Panicum Virgatum, And Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Miscanthus x giganteus, Panicum virgatum, and Other Habitat Types in Southeastern Ohio A thesis presented to the faculty of the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Taylor L. Snelick May 2018 © 2018 Taylor L. Snelick. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Miscanthus x giganteus, Panicum virgatum, and Other Habitat Types in Southeastern Ohio by TAYLOR L. SNELICK has been approved for the Program of Environmental Studies and the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs by Kelly S. Johnson Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Mark Weinberg Dean, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs 3 ABSTRACT SNELICK, TAYLOR L., M.S., May 2018, Environmental Studies Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Miscanthus x giganteus, Panicum virgatum, and Other Habitat Types in Southeastern Ohio Director of Thesis: Kelly S. Johnson Bioenergy could help reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture that contribute to climate change, while at the same time supply energy to a growing population. Varying levels of inputs within bioenergy crop fields, such as pesticide use or annual tilling, can impact arthropod biodiversity and abundance. The research presented here examines the impact of habitat type (Miscanthus x giganteus, Panicum virgatum, abandoned agriculture, and forested edge) on the diversity and abundance of arthropods in small (The Ridges Land Lab) and larger (The Wilds) planted plots in southeastern Ohio. A variety of collection methods (sweep nets, flight traps, and Berlese funnels) were used over a three month period to collect arthropods from different trophic groups. Overall, 25,390 arthropods were captured with the highest abundance consistently seen in forested edge habitats, followed by abandoned agriculture, switchgrass, and lastly miscanthus. Flying insects found in the forested edge were three fold more abundant than those found in miscanthus plots, with intermediate levels in switchgrass and abandoned agriculture. Dominant flying arthropod groups included leaf hoppers, flies and rove beetles. Abundance of litter arthropods was almost two fold higher in switchgrass than in miscanthus plots: dominant taxa included oribatid mites, ants, ground beetles, and collembolans. Taxonomic richness and Shannon diversity were lower in litter samples 4 compared to flight/ sweep samples. Compared to forested edges, miscanthus supported fewer omnivores, pollinators, and predator/parasites. Detritivorous arthropod abundances did not differ across habitat types. No significant differences were noted between arthropod diversity and abundance between the larger fields of biofuel grasses at the Wilds compared to the Ridges Land Lab. This current study shows that cellulosic ethanol crop type does have an impact on arthropod communities; with miscanthus consistently supporting the least diverse and lowest arthropod abundances compared to more diverse natural areas such as forested edges. This project is meant to be a relative measure of arthropod diversity and abundance in two different size field settings in Southeastern Ohio and results may be different in other field settings. 5 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my parents, Lisa Ann and John Gregory Snelick, whose love, unselfish support, and example over my lifetime laid the foundations for the discipline necessary to complete this work. 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the knowledge and wisdom provided to me from my advisors, Kelly Johnson, Sarah Davis, and Arthur Trese as well as the support of other faculty and staff at the Voinovich School. I thank you all for your continued support over the course of this project. The tremendous amount of field work and arthropod identification could also not have been done without the help from undergraduate assistants, Tristan Hoffman, Lillian Rudolf, and Monica Ciszewski. I thank my roommates and friends over the past two years for keeping me sane through this process as well as listening to me practice my presentations and speeches over and over again; Nina Fuller and Johanna Ansel. I thank my partner, Scotty Farey, for his unfailing love, support and continuous encouragement as I completed my degree. My family has raised me to be the person I am today and without their support I would not have made it through my undergraduate and graduate careers. My family’s love for the outdoors and all living things is what embedded in me love for the environment in the first place. I thank my dad for letting me use his car as I traveled to and from college, and my mom for letting me store my bugs in her freezer every time I came home. I thank my youngest sister, Brooke Snelick, for sitting with me as I sorted my arthropods for countless hours that could have been spent playing games with her instead. I have had the pleasure of seeing my sister, Jordan Snelick, transformed into a student professional herself at the Voinovich School as we attended our last year of college together; she also created the ArcGIS maps for this thesis. Thank you, all. 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 3 Dedication ........................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 9 List of Figures ................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: Literature Review ............................................................................................ 11 1.1 Introduction to Biofuels: Cellulosic Ethanol and Biodiesel ................................. 11 1.2 Current Trends in Biofuel Crop Production .......................................................... 16 1.2.1 Development of Biofuel Policies Abroad and in the US ............................. 16 1.2.2 Available American Cropland ..................................................................... 17 1.3 Global Arthropod Declines ................................................................................... 18 1.4 Arthropod Community Dynamics in Biofuel Feedstocks .................................... 19 1.4.1 Miscanthus x giganteus ................................................................................ 20 1.4.2 Panicum virgatum ........................................................................................ 21 1.4.3 Abandoned Agriculture and Forested Areas ................................................ 22 1.5 Decision Making and Adaptive Management....................................................... 23 Chapter 2: Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Miscanthus x giganteus, Panicum virgatum, and Other Habitat Types in Southeastern Ohio ................................................ 26 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 26 2.2 Methods................................................................................................................. 28 2.2.1 Study Areas .................................................................................................. 28 2.2.2 Experimental Design .................................................................................... 31 2.2.3 Sampling Methods ....................................................................................... 32 2.2.4 Arthropod Identification and Counting ........................................................ 34 2.2.5 Statistical Methods ....................................................................................... 34 Chapter 3: Results ............................................................................................................. 36 3.1 Summer Sampling Event: The Ridges Land Lab ................................................. 37 3.1.1 Impact of Habitat Type on Total Arthropod Number .................................. 37 3.1.2 Impact of Habitat Type on Family Level Richness ..................................... 39 3.1.3 Impact of Habitat Type on Arthropod Diversity.......................................... 43 8 3.1.4 Impact of Habitat Type on Trophic Groups ................................................. 45 3.2 September Sampling Event: The Wilds ................................................................ 47 3.2.1 Impact of Habitat Type and Site on Arthropod Abundance ........................ 48 3.2.2 Impact of Habitat Type on Family Level Richness ..................................... 49 3.2.3 Impact of Habitat Type on Diversity ........................................................... 50 Chapter 4: Discussion ....................................................................................................... 51 4.1 Summer Sampling Event ...................................................................................... 51 4.1.1 Arthropod Abundance and Family Richness related to Habitat Type ......... 51 4.1.2 Arthropod Diversity Related to Habitat Type .............................................. 53 4.1.3 Trophic Group Response to Habitat
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Chromosome-Scale Assembly of Miscanthus Sinensis
    1/23/2018 A chromosome-scale assembly allows genome-scale analysis A Chromosome-Scale Assembly • Genome assembly and annotation update of Miscanthus sinensis • Andropogoneae relatedness Therese Mitros University of California Berkeley • Miscanthus-specific duplication and ancestry • Miscanthus ancestry and introgression Miscanthus genome assembly is chromosome scale • A doubled-haploid accession of Miscanthus sinensis was created by Katarzyna Glowacka • Illumina sequencing to 110X depth • Illumina mate-pairs of 2kb, 5kb, fosmid-end • Chicago and HiC libraries from Dovetail Genomics • 2.079 GB assembled (11% gap) with 91% of genome assembly bases in the known 19 Miscanthus chromosomes HiC contact map Dovetail assembly agrees with genetic map RADseq markers from 3 M. ) sinensis maps and one M. sinensis cM ( x M. sacchariflorus map (H. Dong) Of 6377 64-mer markers from these maps genetic map 4298 map well to the M. sinensis DH1 assembly and validate the Dovetail assembly combined Miscanthus Miscanthus sequence assembly 1 1/23/2018 Annotation summary • 67,789 Genes, 11,489 with alternate transcripts • 53,312 show expression over 50% of their lengths • RNA-seq libraries from stem, root, and leaves sampled over multiple growing seasons • Small RNA over same time points • Available at phytozome • https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_Msinensis_er Miscanthus duplication and retention relative Small RNA to Sorghum miRNA putative_miRNA 0.84% 0.14% 369 clusters miRBase annotated miRNA 61 clusters phasiRNA 43 clusters 1.21%
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Isopods from the Hawaiian Islands (Isopoda: Oniscidea)1
    59 Terrestrial Isopods from the Hawaiian Islands (Isopoda: Oniscidea)1 STEFANO TAITI (Centro di Studio per la Faunistica ed Ecologia Tropicali del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy) and FRANCIS G. HOWARTH (Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, PO Box 19000, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA) The following are notable new distribution records for terrestrial isopods in Hawaii. Four species are newly recorded from the state, and many new island records are given for other species, especially for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, where only one species (Porcellionides pruinosus [Brandt]) was previously known. All included records are based on specimens deposited in Bishop Museum. Taiti & Ferrara (1991) presented new distribution records and taxonomic information on 27 species and provided an overview of the terrestrial isopod fauna of the Hawaiian Islands, and Nishida (1994) list- ed all species recorded from the islands together with the island distributions of each. We call special attention to the several endemic armadillid pillbugs that have not been recollected in more than 60 years. These are Hawaiodillo danae (Dollfus) and H. sharpi (Dollfus) from Kauai, H. perkinsi (Dollfus) from Maui, Spherillo albospinosus (Dollfus) from Oahu, and S. carinulatus Budde-Lund from Kauai. In addition, S. hawai- ensis Dana, previously recorded from Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, and Lanai was last collected on the main islands in 1933 on Oahu although it appears to be still common on Nihoa. We fear some species in this complex may be extinct and encourage field biologists to watch for them in potential refugia. For economy of space, the following abbreviations are used for collectors listed be- low: DJP = David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Miscanthus Establishment
    Giant Miscanthus Establishment Introduction Giant Miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus), a warm-season perennial grass originating in Southeast Asia from two ornamental grasses, M. sacchariflorus and M. sinensis, is a popular candidate crop for biomass production in the Midwestern United States. This sterile hybrid is high yielding with many benefits to the land including soil stabilization and carbon sequestration. Vegetative propagation methods are necessary since giant Miscanthus does not produce viable seed. Field Preparation A giant Miscanthus stand first begins with field seedbed preparation. To provide good soil to rhizome contact, Figure 1. Rhizome segments. Photo credit: Heaton Lab. the seedbed should be tilled to a 3- to 5-inch depth. Soil moisture is critical to proper establishment for early stage time after the first frost in the fall and before the last one in germination. If working with dry land, prepare your field just the spring. If not immediately replanted in a new field, they prior to planting for optimal soil moisture. Good soil contact should be kept moist and cool (37-40º F) in storage. Ideal is also critical, so conversely, don’t till when the land is wet rhizomes have two to three visible buds, are light colored, and clods will form. Nutrient (NPK) and lime applications and firm (Fig. 1). Smaller rhizomes or those that are soft to should be made to the field as necessary before planting, the touch will likely have lower emergence. following typical corn recommendations for the area. Giant Miscanthus does not have high nutrient requirements once RHIZOME PLANTING established, but fields last for 20-30 years, so it is important Specialized rhizome planters are becoming available that adequate nutrition be present at establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • "Philosciidae" (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea)
    Org. Divers. Evol. 1, Electr. Suppl. 4: 1 -85 (2001) © Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik http://www.senckenberg.uni-frankfurt.de/odes/01-04.htm Phylogeny and Biogeography of South American Crinocheta, traditionally placed in the family "Philosciidae" (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea) Andreas Leistikow1 Universität Bielefeld, Abteilung für Zoomorphologie und Systematik Received 15 February 2000 . Accepted 9 August 2000. Abstract South America is diverse in climatic and thus vegetational zonation, and even the uniformly looking tropical rain forests are a mosaic of different habitats depending on the soils, the regional climate and also the geological history. An important part of the nutrient webs of the rain forests is formed by the terrestrial Isopoda, or Oniscidea, the only truly terrestrial taxon within the Crustacea. They are important, because they participate in soil formation by breaking up leaf litter when foraging on the fungi and bacteria growing on them. After a century of research on this interesting taxon, a revision of the terrestrial isopod taxa from South America and some of the Antillean Islands, which are traditionally placed in the family Philosciidae, was performed in the last years to establish monophyletic genera. Within this study, the phylogenetic relationships of these genera are elucidated in the light of phylogenetic systematics. Several new taxa are recognized, which are partially neotropical, partially also found on other continents, particularly the old Gondwanian fragments. The monophyla are checked for their distributional patterns which are compared with those patterns from other taxa from South America and some correspondence was found. The distributional patterns are analysed with respect to the evolution of the Oniscidea and also with respect to the geological history of their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioresources.Com
    PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Selected Grass Plants as Biomass Fuels and Raw Materials for Papermaking, Part II. Pulp and Paper Properties Dariusz Danielewicz,a,* Barbara Surma-Ślusarska,a Grzegorz Żurek,b Danuta Martyniak,b Magdalena Kmiotek,a and Katarzyna Dybka a The yield and kappa number of kraft pulps from tall wheatgrass, tall fescue, tall oatgrass, and Miscanthus were determined after pulping with 0.9% active alkali per 1% lignin content in raw materials. Fibre properties and test papers were also studied to evaluate the usefulness of these plants for papermaking. These results were compared with pulps prepared from birch and pine wood. Kraft pulps from the straws of grasses had yields similar to that of pulp from pine wood and lower kappa numbers than pulps from birch and pine wood. The tested pulps exhibited a favourable number of fibres in 1 g of pulp, and they resulted in papers with clearly differentiated properties from very resistant to rupture dense papers with very low air permeability, to less resistant to breaking more bulky papers. Keywords: Tall wheatgrass; Tall fescue; Tall oatgrass; Miscanthus giganteus; Kraft pulping; Properties of pulps Contact information: a: Fibrous Pulps Technology Division, Institute of Papermaking and Printing, Lodz University of Technology, 223 Wolczanska Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland; b: Institute of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization, 5 Radzików Street, 05-870 Błonie, Poland; *Corresponding author: [email protected] (www.pulppaper.eu) INTRODUCTION The cultivation of tall wheatgrass (Elytrigia elongate), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), tall oatgrass (Arrhenatherum elatius), and Miscanthus × giganteus has recently begun in Poland. In Part I of this study, the yields of these crops per hectare of cultivation, their calorific value, and their chemical compositions were presented (Danielewicz et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Fact Sheet
    United States Department of Agriculture NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Forestry Technical Note No. MT-27 April 2006 FORESTRY TECHNICAL NOTE ______________________________________________________________________ Performance Evaluations of Herbaceous Vegetation on Disturbed Forestland in Southeastern Montana Robert Logar, State Staff Forester Larry Holzworth, Plant Material Specialist Summary Information for seeding herbaceous vegetation following forestland disturbance was identified as a conservation need in southeastern Montana. The herbaceous vegetation could be used to control soil erosion, stabilize disturbed sites, manage noxious weeds and provide forage. The Fulton Ranch field evaluation planting (FEP) was established in November 1995 on a disturbed forestland site in southeastern Montana to study the adaptation, performance and use of various grass species. The site, a Ponderosa pine/Idaho fescue habitat-type, had received a light to moderate burn from a wildfire that occurred in August 1994 and was logged the following spring. Nineteen evaluation plots were established to test seventeen different accessions of grasses; two control (unseeded) plots were established. Each plot was one-quarter of an acre in size. Seeded species included ‘Sherman’ big bluegrass, ‘Latar’ orchardgrass, ‘Paiute’ orchardgrass, ‘Manska’ pubescent wheatgrass, ‘Oahe’ intermediate wheatgrass, ‘Rush’ intermediate wheatgrass, ‘Dacotah’ switchgrass, ‘Forestberg’ switchgrass, 9005308 mountain brome, ‘Regar’ meadow brome, ‘Redondo’ Arizona fescue, ‘Whitmar’ beardless wheatgrass, ‘Goldar’ bluebunch wheatgrass, M-1 Nevada bluegrass, ‘Killdeer’ sideoats grama, ‘Pierre’ sideoats grama, and ‘Pryor’ slender wheatgrass. An evaluation of several species for seeding road systems was also conducted as part of this FEP. Road surface, cut and fill slopes were seeded with ‘Luna’ pubescent wheatgrass, ‘Covar’ sheep fescue, ‘Durar’ hard fescue, ‘Critana’ thickspike wheatgrass, ‘Sodar’ streambank wheatgrass, and ‘Rosana’ western wheatgrass.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting and Managing Switchgrass As a Biomass Energy Crop
    United States Technical Note No. 3 Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Materials Planting and Managing Program September 2009 Switchgrass as a Biomass Energy Crop Issued September 2009 Cover photo: Harvesting dormant switchgrass for biofuel (Photo by Don Tyler, University of Tennessee) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, re­ prisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should con­ tact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Preface The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conserva­ tion Service (NRCS) Plant Materials Program has been involved in the col­ lection, evaluation, selection, increase, and release of conservation plants for 76 years. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) was quickly recognized as one of the key perennial grasses for soil conservation following the dust bowl era of the 1930s. The first named switchgrass cultivar, ‘Blackwell’, was released in 1944 by the NRCS Manhattan, Kansas, Plant Materials Center (PMC) in cooperation with the Kansas Agriculture Experiment Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Tallow Tree (Triadica Sebifera)
    THE WEEDY TRUTH ABOUT BIOFUELS TIM LOW & CAROL BOOTH Invasive Species Council October 2007 Title: The Weedy Truth About Biofuels Authors: Tim Low & Carol Booth Published by the Invasive Species Council, Melbourne October 2007 Updated March 2008 The INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL is a non-government organisation that works to protect the Australian environment from invasive pest species. Address: PO Box 166, Fairfield, Vic 3078 Email: [email protected] Website: www.invasives.org.au Further copies of this report can be obtained from the ISC website at www.invasives.org.au Cover photo: Spartina alterniflora, by the US Department of Agriculture CCOONNTTEENNTTSS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 What are biofuels? ................................................................................................................ 2 The Biofuel industry .............................................................................................................. 4 The problems with biofuels ................................................................................................ 6 Social and economic issues ............................................................................................ 6 Greenhouse issues ............................................................................................................ 7 Biodiversity issues ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Habitats Humans Provide: Factors Affecting the Diversity And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The Habitats Humans Provide: Factors afecting the diversity and composition of arthropods in Received: 5 June 2017 Accepted: 30 October 2017 houses Published: xx xx xxxx Misha Leong 1, Matthew A. Bertone2, Amy M. Savage3, Keith M. Bayless1,2, Robert R. Dunn4,5 & Michelle D. Trautwein1 The indoor biome is a novel habitat which recent studies have shown exhibit not only high microbial diversity, but also high arthropod diversity. Here, we analyze fndings from a survey of 50 houses (southeastern USA) within the context of additional survey data concerning house and room features, along with resident behavior, to explore how arthropod diversity and community composition are infuenced by physical aspects of rooms and their usage, as well as the lifestyles of human residents. We found that indoor arthropod diversity is strongly infuenced by access to the outdoors and carpeted rooms hosted more types of arthropods than non-carpeted rooms. Arthropod communities were similar across most room types, but basements exhibited more unique community compositions. Resident behavior such as house tidiness, pesticide usage, and pet ownership showed no signifcant infuence on arthropod community composition. Arthropod communities across all rooms in houses exhibit trophic structure—with both generalized predators and scavengers included in the most frequently found groups. These fndings suggest that indoor arthropods serve as a connection to the outdoors, and that there is still much yet to be discovered about their impact on indoor health and the unique ecological dynamics within our homes. Houses provide an enormous amount of habitat on a global scale1. Humans spend 90% of their time indoors2, providing ample opportunity for this environment and its species to afect mental3 and physical well-being4.
    [Show full text]
  • Collembola of Canada 187 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 187–195 (2019) Collembola of Canada 187 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Collembola of Canada Matthew S. Turnbull1, Sophya Stebaeva2 1 Unaffiliated, Kingston, Ontario, Canada2 The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Aca- demy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia Corresponding author: Matthew S. Turnbull ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 16 January 2018 | Accepted 8 May 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/3A331779-19A1-41DA-AFCF-81AAD4CB049F Citation: Turnbull MS, Stebaeva S (2019) Collembola of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 187–195.https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 Abstract The state of knowledge of diversity of Collembola in Canada was assessed by examination of literature and DNA barcode data. There are 474 described extant Collembola species known from Canada, a significant change compared to the 520 species estimated to occur in Canada in 1979 (Richards 1979) and the 341 reported in the most recent national checklist (Skidmore 1993). Given the number of indeterminate or cryptic species records, the dearth of sampling in many regions, and the growing use of genetic biodiversity assessment methods such as Barcode Index Numbers, we estimate the total diversity of Collembola in Canada to be approximately 675 species. Advances in Collembola systematics and Canadian research are discussed. Keywords biodiversity assessment, Biota of Canada, Collembola, springtails Collembola, commonly known as springtails, is a class of small, entognathous, wing- less hexapods that is a sister group to Insecta.
    [Show full text]
  • (Collembola) in Meadows, Pastures and Road Verges in Central Finland
    © Entomologica Fennica. 29 August 2017 Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pastures and road verges in Central Finland Atte Komonen* & Saana Kataja-aho Komonen, A. & Kataja-aho, S. 2017: Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pas- tures and road verges in Central Finland. — Entomol. Fennica 28: 157–163. Understanding of species distribution, abundance and habitat affinities is crucial for red-list assessment, conservation and habitat management. In Central Fin- land, we studied Collembola in three habitat types, namely non-grazed meadows, pastures and road verges using pitfall traps. Altogether, 9,630 Collembola indi- viduals were recorded. These belonged to 12 families, 34 genera and 60 species. The number of specimens was clearly higher in meadows than in pastures or road verges. The number of species, however, was higher in meadows and road verges (40 and 39 species, respectively) than in pastures (33 species). The overall spe- cies number is comparable to other large-scale sampling schemes in similar habi- tats. We recorded a few abundant species (Spatulosminthurus flaviceps, Smin- thurus viridis and Sminthurus nigromaculatus) that have been previously re- corded from very different biotopes. In conclusion, biodiversity inventories of soil fauna, as well as other biota, should also include marginal habitats, which of- ten host peculiar communities. A. Komonen, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environ- mental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; *Cor- responding author’s e-mail: [email protected] S. Kataja-aho, University of Jyväskylä, Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 November 2016, accepted 22 December 2016 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioresources.Com
    PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com PRODUCTION OF XYLO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES FROM MISCANTHUS x GIGANTEUS BY AUTOHYDROLYSIS Pablo Ligero,a Johannes C. van der Kolk,b Alberto de Vega,a,* and Jan E.G. van Dam b Xylo-oligosaccharides were obtained from Miscanthus x giganteus. The process was designed as a biorefinery scheme, which seeks the separation of the three main components: cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. To extract the hemicelluloses, particularly xylans, in an efficient way, Miscanthus was subjected to autohydrolysis. The system was evaluated for the effects of temperature (160 to 200oC) and reaction time (15 to 60 min) on various parameters, reflecting the changes undergone during the process. The results showed that autohydrolysis is a suitable method for obtaining high yields of xylo-oligosaccharides, reaching values close to 65% of the dissolved xylans (based on the initial amount of potential xylose). Analysis of the process by using the severity factor (RO) allowed for the identification of a set of time-temperature values for which the fractionation was optimal. Keywords: Miscanthus x giganteus; Autohydrolysis; Xylo-oligosaccharides; Fractionation Contact information: a: Departament of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences, University of A Coruña, Rúa da Fraga 10, 15004, A Coruña, Spain; b: Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; * Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Lignocellulosic biomass is considered to be a major source for ‘green’ chemicals, bio-fuels, and biobased products. Among the advantages of using lignocellulosic biomass can be mentioned that it is abundantly available around the world, non-competitive with food production, and it is a renewable and sustainable resource.
    [Show full text]