Cropping Miscanthus X Giganteus in Commercial Fields

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cropping Miscanthus X Giganteus in Commercial Fields Cropping Miscanthus x giganteus in commercial fields : from agro-environmental diagnostic to ex ante design and assessment of energy oriented cropping systems Claire Lesur To cite this version: Claire Lesur. Cropping Miscanthus x giganteus in commercial fields : from agro-environmental diag- nostic to ex ante design and assessment of energy oriented cropping systems. Agricultural sciences. AgroParisTech, 2012. English. NNT : 2012AGPT0084. tel-01124310 HAL Id: tel-01124310 https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01124310 Submitted on 6 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. N°: 2009 ENAM XXXX Doctorat ParisTech T H È S E pour obtenir le grade de docteur délivré par L’Institut des Sciences et Industries du Vivant et de l’Environnement (AgroParisTech) Spécialité : Agronomie présentée et soutenue publiquement par Claire LESUR le 21 décembre 2012 Cultiver Miscanthus x giganteus en parcelles agricoles : du diagnostic agro-environnemental à la conception-évaluation ex ante de systèmes de culture à vocation énergétique Directeur de thèse : Marie-Hélène JEUFFROY Co-encadrement de la thèse : Chantal LOYCE Jury M. Eric JUSTES , Ingénieur de Recherche , UMR AGIR, INRA Toulouse Rapporteur M. Jacques WERY , Professeur , UMR System, Montpellier SupAgro Rapporteur M. Hubert BOIZARD , Ingénieur de Recherche , UMR Agro-Impact, INRA Lille Examinateur M. Thierry DORE , Professeur , UMR Agronomie, AgroParisTech Examinateur M. Laurent LEJARS , Ingénieur , Chambre d’Agriculture du Loiret Examinateur M. Goetz RICHTER , Docteur, Sustainable Soils and Grassland Systems, Rothamsted Research Examinateur Mme Chantal LOYCE , Maître de Conférences, UMR Agronomie, AgroParisTech Encadrante AgroParisTech UMR Agronomie INRA Versailles-Grignon 78850 Thiverval-Grignon Remerciements Je remercie tout d’abord Chantal Loyce d’avoir proposé et encadré ce travail de thèse. Merci à elle de m’avoir transmis ses connaissances avec disponibilité et bonne humeur. Je remercie également Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy d’avoir dirigé cette thèse en se rendant toujours disponible malgré son emploi du temps très chargé. Merci Marie-Hélène de savoir si bien poser les questions qui font réfléchir. Mes remerciements vont aux membres de mon comité de pilotage : Marc Benoît, Guillaume Decocq, Thierry Doré, Florence Jacquet, Laurence Guichard, Delphine Leenhardt. Merci à eux pour la pertinence de leurs commentaires et de leurs questions. Je remercie également les membres du module ressources de Futurol, en particulier les collègues d’Economie Publique, de Mirecourt et d’Agro-Impact : nos échanges ont toujours permis d’enrichir ma réflexion. Merci à Eric Justes et Jacques Wery d’avoir accepté d’être les rapporteurs de cette thèse. Merci à Hubert Boizard, Thierry Doré, Laurent Lejars et Goetz Richter d’avoir accepté de faire partie du jury. Ce travail est le fruit de nombreuses collaborations. Je tiens à remercier l’ensemble des collègues de Bourgogne, sans qui sa réalisation n’aurait pas été possible. Merci à Philippe Béjot, de Bourgogne Pellets, et Dominique Garnaux, de la Coopérative de Déshydratation de la Haute- Seine d’avoir permis la mise en place du réseau de parcelles agricoles de miscanthus. Je remercie les agriculteurs qui ont accepté de participer à ce réseau d’avoir toujours pris le temps de répondre à nos demandes, y compris quand il s’agissait d’installer des stations météorologiques, de creuser un profil cultural ou de peser des bennes. Merci à l’équipe d’Epoisses de nous avoir autorisés d’utiliser leurs chambres froides. Merci à Hubert Boizard et Stéphane Cadoux d’être venus lire les profils culturaux. L’ensemble des mesures effectuées sur le réseau de parcelles est le fruit d’un travail d’équipe. Un grand merci à Mathieu Bazot d’avoir été présent tout au long du suivi. Merci également à Arnaud Butier, Gilles Grandeau, Dominique Le Floch et Richard Gosse d’avoir régulièrement fait le déplacement. Merci à Mathieu et Gilles d’avoir toujours su réagir en cas de pannes. Merci à Véronique Tanneau, Béatrice Le Fouillen, Christine Souin et Richard Gosse d’avoir participé au dépouillement des échantillons. Un merci particulier pour Arnaud et Dominique qui m’ont remplacée quand ma santé m’a empêchée de me rendre sur le terrain. Je remercie aussi l’unité expérimentale de Laon de nous avoir prêté leur préleveur et Stéphanie Arnoult d’avoir réalisé les analyses génétiques. Merci à Mathieu Lorin et Fadel Bio-Beri pour le sérieux et la motivation qu’ils ont montrés tout au long de leur stage. Merci à Bruno Mary pour son aide précieuse lors de l’utilisation de LIXIM, ainsi qu’à Fabien Ferchaud et Guillaume Vitté qui nous ont permis de prendre du recul sur nos résultats. Merci à tous les membres de l’atelier de conception de systèmes de culture : Louis-Marie Allard, Philippe Béjot, Emmanuel Bonnin, Stéphane Cadoux, Fabien Ferchaud, Michael Geloen et Damien Ronget. Je remercie particulièrement Michael Geloen dont l’aide m’a été précieuse pour préciser certains éléments des itinéraires techniques. Merci à Raymond Reau pour ses précieux conseils sur les ateliers de conception de systèmes de culture. Je remercie également Marie-Sophie Petit de nous avoir accueillis dans les locaux de la Chambre régionale d’agriculture. Certaines collaborations ont largement dépassé le cadre de la Bourgogne. Merci à Andrew Riche, Ian Shield, Nicola Yates, Maendy Fritz, Beate Formowitz, Uffe Jorgensen, Poul-Erik Laerke et Michael Grunert d’avoir accepté de me transmettre leurs données. Merci à Nicola, Andrew et Ian pour les fructueux échanges que nous avons eu lors de mon séjour à Rothamsted. Mes remerciements vont également à David Makowski dont la participation à ce chapitre a été décisive. Merci à lui d’avoir toujours répondu à mes questions « stat » et de s’être intéressé à mon travail à chacun de ses passages dans le bureau. La dernière partie de cette thèse est longtemps restée en suspens. Un immense merci à la team PerSyst pour sa persévérance face aux affres et mystères de l’informatique. Merci à Laurence Guichard d’avoir pris le temps et les moyens nécessaires au développement du modèle. Je remercie également Rémy Ballot qui a non seulement assuré le paramétrage de PerSyst en Bourgogne mais est aussi devenu un expert es « déploiement ». Merci Rémy de ne pas avoir compté ton temps. Merci également à Damien Craheix de m’avoir facilité le calcul des indicateurs et à Mathieu Lorin de m’avoir expliqué en urgence le fonctionnement de CRITER. Merci à tous les collègues de l’unité Agronomie qui ont un jour répondu à une de mes questions, m’ont donné une idée ou permis de positiver. Je remercie Marie Gosme pour ses précieuses astuces en « R ». Merci à Michèle Fanucci de trouver des solutions à tous les tracas administratifs et à Alain Bône de savoir dénicher n’importe quelle publi. Je remercie également Joëlle Brun de s’être occupée des dossiers, ordres de missions et autres états de frais. Ces trois années n’auraient pas été les mêmes sans les Girls in Agronomy. Aïcha, Aurore, Caroline, Céline, Diana, Laure, Tatiana, merci pour les bons moments passés ensemble. Merci aussi pour votre soutien dans les moments de doute et dans la phase finale. Un grand merci à Aurore de m’avoir fait profiter de son expérience et de son sens de l’organisation. Merci à Aïcha et Diana de nous avoir donné la joie de rencontrer Kintana et Noémie ! Merci aussi à tous les amis qui m’ont pendant ces trois années écoutée et soutenue. Une petite pensée à phD qui nous a accompagné presque jusqu’au bout de l’aventure. Merci à toute ma famille pour son soutien sans faille. Merci à mon père de m’avoir transmis son goût pour la biologie (ainsi que quelques principes méthodologiques bien utiles !). Merci à ma mère pour ses qualités humaines et sa faculté à toujours voir le côté positif des évènements. Merci à ma belle-famille de s’être toujours intéressée à l’avancement de mon travail. Je tiens enfin à remercier Benoît de m’avoir accompagnée tout au long de cette ascension. Le chemin fut long, parfois sinueux, mais tu as toujours été là avec optimisme, chaleur et énergie. Ton soutien dans l’arrête terminale a été précieux . Table des matières Introduction générale .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapitre 1. ........................................................................................................................................ Contexte et problématique ........................................................................................................... 4 1. Contexte et enjeux autour de la production de biocarburants ............................................. 5 1.1. De la première à la deuxième génération de biocarburants ......................................... 5 1.2. Diversité des ressources agricoles candidates à la production de biocarburants 2G et stratégies de production ............................................................................................. 11 2. Miscanthus x giganteus : une “nouvelle” culture candidate
Recommended publications
  • New Varieties 2020-2021
    New Varieties 2020-2021 Agrostis nebulosa, Cloud Grass Gazania krebsiana, Tanager y 7 Ajuga genevensis, Upright Bugle y 4 Geranium, Night Alyssum saxatile, Gold Rush y 3 Geum chiloense, Sunrise y 4 Amaranthus cruentus, Burgundy Glow Geum coccineum, Orange Queen y 5 Angelica sylvestris, Vicar's Mead y 4 Helianthus annuus, Equinox Antirrhinum Greenhouse Forcing, Costa Summer Helianthus annuus, Firebrand Aquilegia caerulea, Earlybird y 3 Helianthus annuus, Orange Globe Arabis blepharophylla, Barranca y 4 Helianthus annuus, Orangeade Aster, Jowi Mix Helianthus annuus, Star Gold Basil, Purple Ball Helleborus x hybrida, Orientalis Double Ladies Mix y 3 Begonia boliviensis, Groovy Heuchera sanguinea, Coral Petite y 3 Bidens ferulifolia y 8 Iberis sempervirens, Snow Cushion y 3 Bigelowia nuttallii y 4 Lathyrus odoratus, Heirloom Mix Bulbine frutescens, Avera Sunset Orange y 9 Lavandula multifida, Torch Minty Ice y 7 Bupleurum longifolium, Bronze Beauty y 3 Lewisia tweedyi, Lovedream y 4 Calamintha nepeta, Marvelette y Liatris spicata, Floristan White y 3 Calendula, Fruit Burst Lilium formosanum var. pricei y 5 Calendula, Goldcrest Lisianthus , Allemande Light Pink Calendula, Playtime Mix Lisianthus , Can Can Purple Calendula, Sherbet Fizz Lisianthus , Chaconne White Campanula medium, Champion II y Lisianthus , Diamond Peach 3 Imp Celosia, Arrabona Red Lisianthus , Flare Celosia cristata, Act Lisianthus , Gavotte Yellow Celosia cristata, Bar Lisianthus , Jasny Lavender Celosia cristata, Bombay Lisianthus , Minuet
    [Show full text]
  • April 26, 2019
    April 26, 2019 Theodore Payne Foundation’s Wild Flower Hotline is made possible by donations, memberships, and the generous support of S&S Seeds. Now is the time to really get out and hike the trails searching for late bloomers. It’s always good to call or check the location’s website if you can, and adjust your expectations accordingly before heading out. Please enjoy your outing, and please use your best flower viewing etiquette. Along Salt Creek near the southern entrance to Sequoia National Park, the wildflowers are abundant and showy. Masses of spring flowering common madia (Madia elegans) are covering sunny slopes and bird’s-eye gilia (Gilia tricolor) is abundant on flatlands. Good crops of owl’s clover (Castilleja sp.) are common in scattered colonies and along shadier trails, woodland star flower (Lithophragma sp.), Munz’s iris (Iris munzii), and the elegant naked broomrape (Orobanche uniflora) are blooming. There is an abundance of Chinese houses (Collinsia heterophylla) and foothill sunburst (Pseudobahia heermanii). This is a banner year for the local geophytes. Mountain pretty face (Tritelia ixiodes ssp. anilina) and Ithuriel’s spear (Triteliea laxa) are abundant. With the warming temperatures farewell to spring (Clarkia cylindrical subsp. clavicarpa) is starting to show up with their lovely bright purple pink floral display and is particularly noticeable along highway 198. Naked broom rape (Orobanche uniflora), foothill sunburst (Pseudobahia heermanii). Photos by Michael Wall © Theodore Payne Foundation for Wild Flowers & Native Plants, Inc. No reproduction of any kind without written permission. The trails in Pinnacles National Park have their own personality reflecting the unusual blooms found along them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chromosome-Scale Assembly of Miscanthus Sinensis
    1/23/2018 A chromosome-scale assembly allows genome-scale analysis A Chromosome-Scale Assembly • Genome assembly and annotation update of Miscanthus sinensis • Andropogoneae relatedness Therese Mitros University of California Berkeley • Miscanthus-specific duplication and ancestry • Miscanthus ancestry and introgression Miscanthus genome assembly is chromosome scale • A doubled-haploid accession of Miscanthus sinensis was created by Katarzyna Glowacka • Illumina sequencing to 110X depth • Illumina mate-pairs of 2kb, 5kb, fosmid-end • Chicago and HiC libraries from Dovetail Genomics • 2.079 GB assembled (11% gap) with 91% of genome assembly bases in the known 19 Miscanthus chromosomes HiC contact map Dovetail assembly agrees with genetic map RADseq markers from 3 M. ) sinensis maps and one M. sinensis cM ( x M. sacchariflorus map (H. Dong) Of 6377 64-mer markers from these maps genetic map 4298 map well to the M. sinensis DH1 assembly and validate the Dovetail assembly combined Miscanthus Miscanthus sequence assembly 1 1/23/2018 Annotation summary • 67,789 Genes, 11,489 with alternate transcripts • 53,312 show expression over 50% of their lengths • RNA-seq libraries from stem, root, and leaves sampled over multiple growing seasons • Small RNA over same time points • Available at phytozome • https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_Msinensis_er Miscanthus duplication and retention relative Small RNA to Sorghum miRNA putative_miRNA 0.84% 0.14% 369 clusters miRBase annotated miRNA 61 clusters phasiRNA 43 clusters 1.21%
    [Show full text]
  • KAMUT® Brand Khorasan Wheat Whole Grain US Senator For
    The Ancient Grain for Modern Life—Our mission is to promote organic agriculture and support organic farmers, to increase diversity of crops and diets and to protect the heritage of a high quality, delicious an- January 2013 cient grain for the benefit of this and future generations. Eat the Whole Thing: KAMUT® Brand Khorasan Wheat Whole Grain UPCOMING Whole grains are an important and tasty way of including complex carbohydrates in a healthy EVENTS diet. Depending on your age, health, weight, and activity level, the USDA recommends that Americans consume at least three portions, from 1.5 ounces (young children) to 8 ounces (older 20 – 22 January boys and young adult men) of grains a day, and that more than half of those grains should be 2013* - National As- whole grains. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines “whole grain to include cere- sociation for the Spe- al grains that consist of the intact, ground, cracked or flaked fruit of the grains whose principal cialty Food Trade, components -- the starchy endosperm, germ and bran -- are present in the same relative propor- Fancy Food Show, San tions as they exist in the intact grain.” Francisco, CA, USA Each part of the grain is healthful, but consuming them “whole” provides all of the benefits work- ing together. The FDA recognizes that whole grains provide energy and provide reduced risk for 25 January 2013 – disease including bowl disorders, cancer, heart disease and high cholesterol, stroke, high blood Annual KAMUT® Grower’s Dinner, Re- pressure, obesity and Type 2 diabetes. gina, SK, Canada In order to help you find good whole grain products, a lot of packaging includes the helpful term “whole grain” on the front or even better includes Whole Grains Council stamps.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Miscanthus Establishment
    Giant Miscanthus Establishment Introduction Giant Miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus), a warm-season perennial grass originating in Southeast Asia from two ornamental grasses, M. sacchariflorus and M. sinensis, is a popular candidate crop for biomass production in the Midwestern United States. This sterile hybrid is high yielding with many benefits to the land including soil stabilization and carbon sequestration. Vegetative propagation methods are necessary since giant Miscanthus does not produce viable seed. Field Preparation A giant Miscanthus stand first begins with field seedbed preparation. To provide good soil to rhizome contact, Figure 1. Rhizome segments. Photo credit: Heaton Lab. the seedbed should be tilled to a 3- to 5-inch depth. Soil moisture is critical to proper establishment for early stage time after the first frost in the fall and before the last one in germination. If working with dry land, prepare your field just the spring. If not immediately replanted in a new field, they prior to planting for optimal soil moisture. Good soil contact should be kept moist and cool (37-40º F) in storage. Ideal is also critical, so conversely, don’t till when the land is wet rhizomes have two to three visible buds, are light colored, and clods will form. Nutrient (NPK) and lime applications and firm (Fig. 1). Smaller rhizomes or those that are soft to should be made to the field as necessary before planting, the touch will likely have lower emergence. following typical corn recommendations for the area. Giant Miscanthus does not have high nutrient requirements once RHIZOME PLANTING established, but fields last for 20-30 years, so it is important Specialized rhizome planters are becoming available that adequate nutrition be present at establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Pollinators
    Native Plants for a Pollinator Gardens Ginny Rosenkranz Extension Educator Commercial Horticulture [email protected] Why Native? • Consider that honeybees are NOT native! • Still…… Choose plants with pollen and nectar • Fragrant flowers • Composite flowers • Umbrella flowers Find the right color • Bees see Blue and Violet • Have a GREAT sense of smell • Like ‘landing pads’ • Tubular flowers Cover all the seasons • Spring flowers • Summer flowers • Fall flowers Include different shapes and sizes Plant in groups • Full sun • Protection from wind • Increases pollination Add water features Spring flowers • Phlox subulata - Moss Pink Spring flowers • Aquilegia – Columbine Spring flowers • Baptisia australis – False Indigo Spring flowers • Dicentra eximia – Fringed Bleeding Hearts Spring flowers • Geranium maculatum – Wild Geranium Spring flowers • Penstemon digitalis – Beard tongue Spring flowers • Salvia lyrata – Lyre leaf sage Spring flowers • Tradescantia virginiana - Spiderwort Viola sororia - Violet Summer annuals • Cleome hassleriana Annual summer flowers • Helianthus annuus - Sunflowers Annual summer flowers • Salvia Summer annuals • Tithonia rotundifolia – Mexican sunflower Summer annuals • Zinnia elegans Summer • Agastache anethiodora – Anise Hyssop Summer • Asclepias tuberosa – Butterfly weed Summer • Asclepias incarnate – swamp Milkweed Summer • Coreopsis lanceolata - Tickseed Summer • Coreopsis verticillata -Threadleaf Coreopsis Summer • Echinacea purpurea – Purple cone flower Summer • Eupatorium dubium- Joe Pye weed Summer • Filipendula
    [Show full text]
  • Updating Barley and Rye Management in Kentucky, Year 2
    UPDATING BARLEY AND RYE MANAGEMENT IN KENTUCKY, YEAR 2 Chad Lee, Carrie Knott, James Dollarhide, Kathleen Russell and Katherine McLachlan, University of Kentucky, Department of Plant & Soil Sciences PH: (859) 257-7874; E-mail: [email protected] The boom in distilleries and growing public received 30 lb N/A in the fall, consistent with our interest in locally grown foods has combined to recommendations when following excellent corn generate much interest in barley and rye for yields. For the nitrogen rate studies, all small Kentucky. These crops have not been studied grains were seeded at 1.25 million per acre. In extensively since intensive wheat management 2015-2016, the studies were conducted only at was developed in Kentucky. Spindletop Farm near Lexington, KY. For 2016- 2017, studies were conducted at Spindletop and In 2016-2017, we investigated seeding rates and at the Research and Education Center at nitrogen (N) rates on barley, malting barley and Princeton, KY. hybrid rye. Seeding rates were 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5 million seeds per acre. For the Six-Row Barley (Feed Barley) seeding rate studies, N rate was set at 90 lb N/A Seed Rates with 30 lb applied at Feekes 3 and 60 applied at Feekes 5. In the winter nitrogen rate study, rates Seed rates did not affect yield of feed barley at of 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 lb N per acre were split- any tie. Yield averaged over 85 bushels per acre. applied at Feekes 3 and 5. In addition, all plots 6-Row Barley: Seed rate effect on yield at Lexington 2016, Lexington 2017 and Princeton 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUALS for UTAH GARDENS Teresa A
    ANNUALS FOR UTAH GARDENS Teresa A. Cerny Ornamental Horticulture Specialist Debbie Amundsen Davis County Horticulture Extension Agent Loralie Cox Cache County Horticulture Extension Agent September 2003 HG-2003/05 Annuals are plants that come up in the spring, reach maturity, flower, set seeds, then die all in one season. They provide eye-catching color to any flower bed and can be used as borders, fillers, or background plantings. There are several ways to find annual species that fit your landscape needs; referring to the All-American Selection program evaluations (http://www.all-americaselections.org), visiting botanical gardens to observe examples of annuals in the landscape, and looking through commercial seed catalogs are excellent places to find ideas. Most annuals are available in cell packs, flats, or individual pots. When buying plants, choose those that are well established but not pot bound. Tall spindly plants lack vigor and should be avoided. Instead look for plants with dark green foliage that are compact and free of insect and disease problems. These criteria are much more important than the flower number when choosing a plant. An abundance of foliage with few, if any flowers, is desirable. BED PREPARATION Avoid cultivating soil too early in the spring and during conditions that are too wet. Soil conditions can be determined by feeling the soil. If the soil forms a ball in your hand but crumbles easily, it is ideal. Cultivate the flower bed to a depth of 6-10 inches by turning the soil with a spade. Utah soils can always use extra organic matter such as grass clippings, leaves, compost, manure, peat, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • GENETICALLY MODIFIED WHEAT 2018 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), 2018
    Incident Report GENETICALLY MODIFIED WHEAT 2018 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), 2018. CFIA P0951-18 ISBN: 978-0-660-26780-7 Catalogue No.: A104-141/2018E-PDF Aussi disponible en français. Request other formats online or call 1-800-442-2342. If you use a teletypewriter (TTY), call 1-800-465-7735. Alternative format are available on demand. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ࢝ The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) was notified on January 31, 2018, about a few wheat plants found on an access road in southern Alberta that survived a spraying treatment for weeds. ࢝ The CFIA’s tests confirmed that the wheat found is genetically modified to be herbicide tolerant. Genetically modified (GM) wheat is not authorized to be grown commercially in any country. ࢝ Since being notified, the CFIA worked diligently with federal and provincial partners and other stakeholders to determine the origin and extent of the GM wheat plants to get as much complete, accurate, and credible information about this discovery as possible. Based on extensive scientific testing, there is no evidence that this GM wheat is present anywhere other than the isolated site where it was discovered. ࢝ There is also no evidence that this wheat has entered the food or animal feed system, nor is it present anywhere else in the environment. ࢝ Health Canada and the CFIA have performed risk assessments of this finding, and have concluded that it does not pose a food safety, animal feed, or environmental risk. ࢝ The wheat plants found in Alberta are not a match for any wheat authorized for sale or for commercial production in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Khorasan (Kamut® Brand) Wheat
    Khorasan (Kamut® Brand) Wheat Introduction Khorasan wheat (Triticum turgidum, ssp. turanicum) is an ancient wheat variety that originated in the Fertile Crescent in Western Asia. It is a relative of durum wheat and is believed to have come to North America from Egypt, following World War II. It was rediscovered in 1977 by a Montana farmer who spent the next few years propagating the small supply of original seed. In 1990, khorasan wheat was first sold under the trademark KAMUT® in the United States. The trademark was implemented to preserve minimum standards for the khorasan wheat variety and to ensure consistent quality and market supply. KAMUT® wheat is currently only grown as KAMUT® wheat has larger heads, awns and kernels than an organic certified grain and hard red spring wheat and durum. marketed to various countries Photo courtesy T. Blyth, Kamut International around the world. Plant Adaptation KAMUT® wheat production is well suited to growing conditions found in southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan, similar to durum. Northern regions with cooler, wetter conditions are less favorable for KAMUT® wheat production as disease risk may be greater and the crop requires about 100 days to mature after seeding or approximately one week later than spring wheat. KAMUT® wheat will grow well in any soil that is suitable for other cereal grain production. KAMUT® wheat has a growth pattern similar to spring wheat varieties. Each sprouted kernel produces one or two stems per seed, and each stem produces a large head with long black awns. It has moderate straw strength and grows to approximately 127 cm (4.2 ft) tall.
    [Show full text]
  • Spelt Wheat: an Alternative for Sustainable Plant Production at Low N-Levels
    sustainability Article Spelt Wheat: An Alternative for Sustainable Plant Production at Low N-Levels Eszter Sugár, Nándor Fodor *, Renáta Sándor ,Péter Bónis, Gyula Vida and Tamás Árendás Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Brunszvik u. 2, 2462 Martonvásár, Hungary; [email protected] (E.S.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (G.V.); [email protected] (T.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-22-569-554 Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 21 November 2019; Published: 27 November 2019 Abstract: Sustainable agriculture strives for maintaining or even increasing productivity, quality and economic viability while leaving a minimal foot print on the environment. To promote sustainability and biodiversity conservation, there is a growing interest in some old wheat species that can achieve better grain yields than the new varieties in marginal soil and/or management conditions. Generally, common wheat is intensively studied but there is still a lack of knowledge of the competitiveness of alternative species such as spelt wheat. The aim is to provide detailed analysis of vegetative, generative and spectral properties of spelt and common wheat grown under different nitrogen fertiliser levels. Our results complement the previous findings and highlight the fact that despite the lodging risk increasing together with the N fertiliser level, spelt wheat is a real alternative to common wheat for low N input production both for low quality and fertile soils. Vitality indices such as flag leaf chlorophyll content and normalized difference vegetation index were found to be good precursors of the final yield and the proposed estimation equations may improve the yield forecasting applications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on KAMUT Khorasan Wheat
    International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition ISSN: 0963-7486 (Print) 1465-3478 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iijf20 Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat Alessandra Bordoni, Francesca Danesi, Mattia Di Nunzio, Annalisa Taccari & Veronica Valli To cite this article: Alessandra Bordoni, Francesca Danesi, Mattia Di Nunzio, Annalisa Taccari & Veronica Valli (2017) Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 68:3, 278-286, DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2016.1247434 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1247434 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 28 Oct 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2866 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iijf20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2017 VOL. 68, NO. 3, 278–286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1247434 COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat Alessandra Bordonia,b , Francesca Danesia , Mattia Di Nunziob , Annalisa Taccaria and Veronica Vallia aDepartment of Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy; bInterdepartmental Centre of Agri-Food Research, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY After WWII, the industrialized agriculture selected modern varieties of Triticum turgidum spp. Received 28 July 2016 durum and spp.
    [Show full text]