DOCSLIB.ORG

1. the Boundaries Qf Aram-Damascus in the Time Qf Ha;::Ael and Bar Hadad, His Son

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. the Boundaries Qf Aram-Damascus in the Time Qf Ha;::Ael and Bar Hadad, His Son THE BO UNDARIES OF ARAM-DAMASCUSIN THE 9TH-8TH CENTURIES BCE* G ERSHO N GAUL Halfa This articlc rccxamincs thc boundarics of Aram-Damascus in the sccond half of thc 9th ccntury and in thc 8th ccntury BCE in light of thc ncw inscriptions publishcd in thc last decadc, mainly Hazael's booty inscriptions from Samo s and Eretria,' the fragments of the Aramaie royal inscription from Tel Dan.? and the new edition of the inscriptions of Tiglath-pileser HP 1. The Boundaries qf Aram-Damascus in the time qf Ha;::ael and Bar Hadad, his son In 841 and again in 838 (and in 837?) Damascus was dcfeated by the Assyrians, the army of Shalman eser IH occupying all the dis­ tricts of the land of Dam ascus up to Mount Hauran.' The dcfeats of Aram on thc battlefield did not lead to its surrender. Assyria failed * This article is based on a pape r presented at the 44th Rencontr e Assyriologique Internationale in Venice in July 1997. I A. Charbonnet, "Le dieu aux lions d'Eretrie ", Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Clasico edel Mediterraneo Antico Seeione di Archeologia e Storia Antico 8 (1986), pp. 117- 156; H. Kyrieleis and W. Roellig, "Ein altorientalisher Pferdeschmu ck aus dem Heraion von Samos", Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archaeologischen Instituts AthenischeAbteilung 103 (1988), pp. 37-75; 1. Eph'al and j. Naveh, "Hazael's Booty Inscriptions", JA] 39 (1989), pp. 192- 200; F. Born and A. Lemaire, "Les inscriptions Arameennes de Hazael", RA 3 (1989), pp. 34- 44. 2 A. Biran and .J. Naveh, "An Aramaie Stele Fragment from T el Dan", JE] 43 (1993), pp. 8 1-98; idem , "T he Tel Dan Inscription: A New Fragment ", IE] 45 (1995), pp. 1-1 8; and recently I. Kottsieper, "Die Inschrift vom Te ll Dan und die politischen Beziehungen zwischen Aram-Damascus und Israel in der I. Haelfe des I. J ahrtausends vor Christus", "Und Mose schrieb dieses Lied auJ"-Studien zum Alten Testament und zum Alten Orient: Festschrift fuer Osioald Loretr; eds. M. Dietrich and 1. Kottsieper (AOAT 250; Mu enster, 1998), pp. 475- 500; A. Lemaire, "T he T el Dan Stela as a Piece of Royal Historiography", ] SOP 81 (1998), pp. 3- 14, with earlier literature 3 H.T admor, The Inscnptions qf Tiglath-pileser III King qf As.ryria (Jerusalern, 1994). 4 A.K. Grayson, As.ryrian Rulers qf the Early First Millennium H.C II (858-745 B.C.), The Royal Inscriptions qf Mesopotamia, As.ryrian Periods III (Toronto, 1996), pp. 48, 54, 60. 36 G. GAUL to conquer Damascus, and Hazael did not become an Assyrian vassal. The Assyrian threat, however, was not liftcd from Dam ascus, and it took Aram several yea rs to rccover from th e blows it had endured. Biblical sources state clearly that H azael subdued his southern neigh­ bors, including the two Israelite kingdoms and Gath of the Philistines. The Aramcan campaigns probably took place during the first fivc years of thc reign of Shamshi-Ada d V, taking advantage of the death of Shalmanese r III and thc revolt in Assyria." H azael annexed to Aram all the land of Israel from the Bashan up to the rivcr Arnon (2 Kgs 10,32- 33). It was probably a vcry cruel and sadistic conqucst which even after three gene rations was not forgotten (Amos 1,3; 2 Kgs 8,12). Most of thc oracles aga inst the nations in the book of Amos, chapter 1, probably refer to the period of Hazael." The empire of H azael may have included not on ly Israel, ]udah , and Gath of the Philistines but also T yrc, the other four Philistine kingdoms , and the kingdom s of Tran sjordan. It is possible that the fall of Calneh and Ham ath mcntion ed in Am os 6,2, also refers to the conquests of Hazael.? Hazael's booty inscriptions from Samos and Eretri a indi cate that Unqi / Pattina was within the ernpire of H azael." Moreover, it is rea­ sona ble to suppose that th c rivcr which H azael crossed was the Euphratcs ("in the year that our lord crosscd the river"). I may therc­ fore suggest that central and northern Syria were under the hege­ mony of Damascus, already during the reign of Hazael (as indicated also, in my opinion , from Amos 6,2).9 ., For the date of Hazael's eampaigns see G. Galil, 711e Chronology cf the Kings qf Israel and ]udah (Leiden, 1996), pp . 48-51. <; \Ve should read: " to deliver them up to Ararn" instead of " to deliver them up to Edom"-Amos 1,6, ete. For earlicr studies of Amos's O racles against the nations see J ßarton , Amos's Oracles against the Nations: A Stu4J qf Amos 1.3- 2.5 (Cambridge, 1980), pp . 25- 31; M .E. Polley, Amos and the Davidie Empire: A Socio-Historieal Approach (New York and O xford, 1989), pp . 76-77. 7 Th e eommentators eonclude that the referenees in Amos 6,2 are to the eam­ paigns of Ti glath-p ileser BI, attributing this verse to a later redaetor of the book of Amo s. Cf. j.H. H ayes, Amos (Nashville, 1988), pp. 183- 84, with earlier litera­ ture. For another approac h to this problem see S.M. Paul, Amos (Minneapolis, 1991), pp . 20 1-204. " T here is no reason to aeeept the ident ifieation of 'M Q in the Eretria and Samos inscriptions with the Beqa' of Lebanon. For this prop osal see N. Na'am an, "H azael of 'Amqi and Hadadezer of ßeth-rehob", UF 27 (1995), pp. 384ff., pp . 393-94; Na'aman misunderstood the inseriptions and his interpretat ion must be rejeeted . 'I For same eonclusions see A. Lcmaire, "Hazael de Damas, roi d'Aram", Morchands, Diplomates et Empereurs: Etudes sur la eivilisation mesopotamienne qffirtes a P. Garelli, eds..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 09,David's Victories and Officers.Pdf
    II Samuel 8:1-18 Lesson #9, David‟s victories and officers The Israelites were surrounded by powerful enemies who had a special hatred of their nation. David, like the Messiah after him must destroy all of his and his people‟s enemies (Lk 20:43). II Samuel 8 tells us of victorious wars against the Philistines, against Moab, against Zobah, against Syria, against Amalek, and against Edom. All these successful conquests are explained in this way: „The Lord gave victory to David wherever he went (II Samuel 8:6,14).1 8:1-14, These verses outline the expansion of David‟s kingdom under the hand of the Lord (v:6,14). Israel‟s major enemies were all defeated as David‟s kingdom extended N, S, E, and W. See I Chronicles 18:1-13. This conquering before the event of chap. 7 (see 7:1) MacArthur Study Bible II Sam 8:1, Now after this it came about that David [1.] v:1, chief city. According to I Chr 18:1, defeated the Philistines and subdued them; and What was probably the chief city of the David took control of the chief city (Metheg Philistines? Ammah) from the hand of the Philistines. 2 He defeated Moab, and measured them with the [2.] v:2, Find Moab on your map, page #4 line, making them lie down on the ground; and he and write a description of it‟s location measured two lines to put to death and one full line to keep alive. And the Moabites became servants to David, bringing tribute.
    [Show full text]
  • Baasha of Ammon
    Baasha of Ammon GARY A. RENDSBURG Cornell University 1lVD'i' 'Xtl1' i1'1::J' i"'~ 1,T The identification of the members of the western coalition who fought Shal­ maneser HI at the battle of Qarqar has engaged Assyriologists since the 19th century. Among the more elusive members of the alliance has been Ba-J-sa miir 1 Ru-bu-bi .KUR A-ma-na-a-a, listed in the Monolith Inscription, column II, line 95. The majority view holds that the toponym A-ma-na-a-a refers to Ammon. the small state located in Transjordan = biblical cammon (Gen. 19:38, etc.). This iden­ tification ,:>riginated among late 19th and early 20th century scholars,2 is repeated in more recent works,3 and appears in standard translations.4 The ~llinority view was first offered by E. Forrer,S who identified the word with Amana, the mountainous region of southern Syria, more specifically the It is my pleasure to thank Peter Machinist and Samuel M. Paley whose helpful suggestions I have incorporated into this article. 1. For the original, see H. C. Rawlinson, The Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia (London, 1870),3: pliltes 7-8. 2. F. Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies ? (Leipzig, 1881),294; F. Hommel. Geschichte Babylolliells und Assyriells (Berlin, 1885), 609; C. P. Tiele, Babylollisch·assyrische Geschichte (Gotha, 1886). 201; E. Schrader. Sammlung von assyrischen und babylonischen Textell (Berlin, (889), I: 173; R. W. Rogers, A History of Babylollia and Assyria (New York, 1901),77; H. Winckler, The History of Babylonia and Assyria (New York, 1907),220; A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Period of the Kings Is the Third Stage in Israel's History. It Follows
    441 The period of the kings is the third stage in Israel’s history. It follows the period of the Patriarchs (Abraham in the year 1750 B.C.) and that of the Exodus and the Conquest (Moses in the year 1250 B.C.). David captured Jerusalem around the year 1000 B.C. After Solomon’s death in the year 932 B.C., the kingdom of David and his son Solomon would be divided. The northern part, called the kingdom of Israel, would cease to exist as a nation two centuries later. The southern part, called the kingdom of Judah, would last until the year 587 B.C., the year of the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple, and of the Exile to Babylon. This period covers a total of four centuries. These four centuries of the kings are the most important in sacred history because this is the period during which God raised up prophets from among his people. The greater part of Scripture was written during those four centuries. It was not only the major prophets who produced writings, e.g., Isaiah and Jeremiah. There 1-2 K were also groups of prophets of lesser importance who wrote much of Israel’s his- tory, such as the greater part of the pages of Genesis and Exodus, the Books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings. We can say that the period of the kings is the most important period in sacred history. It is also the time which we know with the greatest precision. These four centuries would appear to be the time of the kingdom of Israel’s deca- dence if we paid attention only to its wealth and power.
    [Show full text]
  • Hittites and Hethites: a Proposed Solution to an Etymological Conundrum
    JETS 54.2 (June 2011) 239–50 HITTITES AND HETHITES: A PROPOSED SOLUTION TO AN ETYMOLOGICAL CONUNDRUM !"#$%& '. ())** The name “Hittite(s)” appears forty-eight times in contemporary English Bibles, 1 stemming from the Reformation Geneva Bible published in 1560. All English translations prior to the Geneva Bible had “Hethite(s)” rather than “Hittite(s),” based on the Latin Vulgate. The Roman Catholic Douay English translation of the OT is the only modern English version to retain “Hethite(s)” from the Vulgate. 2 Should it be “Hethite(s),” “Hittite(s),” or a combination of חִ תִּי the two? Both names are Anglicized transliterations of the gentilic terms f. pl.) in the Hebrew Bible, which) חתִּיּ ֹת m. pl.), and) חִ ִ תּים ,(.f. sg) חִ ִ תּית ,(.m. sg) we shall examine in detail in this article. 3 There was a time when historians sco+ed at the name “Hittite(s)” in the OT since it was not known outside the Bible. 4 Archaeological discoveries in Egypt, Mesopotamia, Turkey, and Syria from the early nineteenth century on, however, have revealed an Indo-European group scholars have dubbed “Hittites” (as opposed to “Hethites”), who established an empire in Anatolia that became a major power in the ancient Near East. But a serious problem remains. The biblical references to Hittites living in Canaan appear to be unhistorical since there is no evidence—linguistic, historical, or archaeologi- cal—for a Hittite presence in Canaan. Kempinsky attempted to establish an early twelfth-century migration of Hittites to Canaan, requiring Abraham to be placed in the thirteenth-twelfth century BC, 5 but this scenario ,nds little support in the archaeological record.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divided Kingdom
    An Outline and Study Guide of The Divided Kingdom Israel Judah Revised Edition by F. L. Booth © 2007 F. L. Booth Zion, Illinois 60099 CONTENTS Page PREFACE ..................................................................................................................... i SECTION I Divided Kingdom Outline ............................................................. 1 Divided Kingdom Endnotes ......................................................... 16 SECTION II Kingdom of Judah Alone Outline................................................ 1 Kingdom of Judah Alone Endnotes ............................................ 8 SECTION III Ancient Empires Outline................................................................ 1 Ancient Empires Endnotes ............................................................ 11 SECTION IV Study Questions Lesson 1 Overview........................................................................................... 1 Lesson 2 The Rending of the Kingdom....................................................... 4 Lesson 3 Rehoboam - Jeroboam................................................................... 6 Lesson 4 Abijam - Jeroboam - Asa .............................................................. 9 Lesson 5 Asa - Nadab - Baasha - Elah - Zimri - Tibni - Omri .................. 11 Lesson 6 Ahab and Elijah................................................................................ 14 Lesson 7 Elijah at Mount Horeb - Ahab and the King of Syria.............. 16 Lesson 8 Jehoshaphat - Ahab and Naboth’s Vineyard...........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hebrew Myths and the Neo Assyrian Empire
    The Hebrew Myths and the Neo-Assyrian Empire. by Benjamín Toro A dissertation submitted to University of Birmingham for the degree of MPhil (B) in Cuneiform Studies. Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity School of Historical Studies University of Birmingham 16 January 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. INFORMATION FOR ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING SERVICES The information on this form will be published. Surname: Toro First names: Benjamin Degree: MPhil (B) in Cuneiform Studies College/Department: Institute of Antiquities and Archaeology. Full title of thesis: The Hebrew Myths and the New Assyrian Empire. Date of submission: 16/01/2011 Date of award of degree (leave blank): Abstract (not to exceed 200 words - any continuation sheets must contain the author's full name and full title of the thesis): This project seeks to study the first expression of Israelite literature which would was elaborated under the shadow of the Neo-Assyrian cultural influence. This occurred approximately between the 9th to 8th centuries BCE, before a transformation triggered off by theological viewpoints held in the southern kingdom of Judah between the 7th to 6th centuries BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Language
    Palestine Exploration Quarterly ISSN: 0031-0328 (Print) 1743-1301 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ypeq20 The Syrian Language C. R. Conder To cite this article: C. R. Conder (1896) The Syrian Language, Palestine Exploration Quarterly, 28:1, 60-78, DOI: 10.1179/peq.1896.28.1.60 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/peq.1896.28.1.60 Published online: 20 Nov 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 5 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ypeq20 Download by: [Universite Laval] Date: 10 April 2016, At: 00:12 60 THg SYRIAN LANGUAGE. the Gate Tat1i, the north gate of the Sanctuary, appears to have been closed and replaced by au underground passage passing under the cloi8ter~, and represented at the present time by Cistern No. 1. The Northern Cloister, like the Western, ended at the Tower of Antonia, the probable approximate position of which I have marked in dotted lines. There is a stateluent in Josephus which appear8 to confirnl this proposed restoration of the Temple, as he mentions that the addition of the Outer Cloisters doubled the area of the Temple Enclosure.1 Now the area, as enclosed by the four Outer Cloisters 3.8 shown on Plan No.2, is rather more than 480,000 square cnbits, and the area of the Sanctuary was 2r)0,00o square cubits; so that the one, speaking- roughly, is just dOllhIe of the ether. In the sections, I have shown the manner in which the Temple lmildings, with the levels given in Josephus and the Mishna, compare with the rock levels, as determined by exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newly Discovered Fragmentary Aramaic Inscription from Tel Dan
    Restoration Quarterly Volume 37 Number 4 Article 4 10-1-1995 The Newly Discovered Fragmentary Aramaic Inscription From Tel Dan John T. Willis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/restorationquarterly Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willis, John T. (1995) "The Newly Discovered Fragmentary Aramaic Inscription From Tel Dan," Restoration Quarterly: Vol. 37 : No. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/restorationquarterly/vol37/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons @ ACU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Restoration Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ ACU. ResLor:2-atJon uar:2-Ler<lcY VOLUME 37/NUM BER 4 FOURTH QUARTER 1995 ISSN 0486-5642 K. C. Moser and Churches of Christ: A Theologica l Perspective JOHN MARK HICKS Philo on Pilate: Rhetoric or Reality? TOM THATCHER The Newly Discovered Fragmentary Aramaic Inscription from Tel Dan JOHN T. WILLIS Strange Encounters of a Lectionary Kind TIM SENSING Book Reviews Book Notes THE NEWLY DISCOVERED FRAGMENTARY ARAMAIC INSCRIPTION FROM TEL DAN 1 JOHN T. WILLIS Abilene, TX Serious scientific archaeological excavation began at Tel Dan (at that time called Tell el Qadi) in northern Israel at the foot of Mount Hermon in 1966 under the outstanding archaeologist Avraham Biran. In 1976 , excavators discovered a bilingual inscription , written in Aramaic and Greek, mentioning "the god who is in Dan ," demonstrating that this site is the location of the biblical Dan .
    [Show full text]
  • And Type the TITLE of YOUR WORK in All Caps
    BURIAL PRACTICES, FUNERARY TEXTS, AND THE TREATMENT OF DEATH IN IRON AGE ISRAEL AND ARAM by RACHEL VIRGINIA KING NABULSI Under the Direction of RICHARD FRIEDMAN ABSTRACT This research encompasses two branches of evidence regarding the treatment of death and burial among the Iron Age cultures of Israel and Aram – the archaeological and the textual. The importance of this investigation lies in placing these groups in dialogue with one another, and in the comprehensive use of both archaeological and textual information. The archaeological aspect of this research begins by collecting archeological data from a large number of burial sites throughout both of the target territories. The range of this data extends from the time of the Late Bronze Age into the Persian period, but the primary focus is upon the Iron Age. The first section of the dissertation relates to each of these areas and what can be learned from a survey of sites over this period, with particular attention paid to commonalities and contrasts among the two cultural groups. The second half of this research encompasses the textual and inscriptional data. Textual data include inscriptions from coffins, tombs, and funerary monuments from the Iron Age through the Persian period in Israel and Aram. Another crucial aspect of this textual data is the text of the Hebrew Bible. The biblical text, particularly the narrative sections of the text, provides a great amount of material for understanding death in Iron Age Israel and Judah. iv INDEX WORDS: Israel, Judah, Aram, Hebrew Bible, death,
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.3 the Neo-Assyrian Empire
    Exploring the Rural Landscape of the Neo-Assyrian Empire: Settlement Increase in the Iron Age Near East Parthiban Yahambaram UCL Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Archaeology July 2018 I, Parthiban Yahambaram, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would never have been written without the guidance, teaching and support given to me by my supervisor, Dr. Rachael Sparks. I would also like to thank my beloved wife Sophie for her love and support, and especially for being patient with me. 2 ABSTRACT The Neo-Assyrian Empire was a complex political entity that controlled most of the Near East from the 9th to the 7th centuries BCE. This empire has been described in recent scholarship as having made a unique imprint on the regional landscape. This thesis is a re-examination of the archaeological evidence that explores the changes in settlement patterns that have been noted in surveys carried out in various parts of the Near East. It also examines excavation evidence from a number of sites in former Assyrian provinces in order to obtain a clearer picture of the rural landscape of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, and to consider whether the Pax Assyriaca hypothesis provides a valid interpretative framework for the survey and excavation evidence. The thesis will reconsider the survey data from the Tigris-Euphrates Archaeological Reconnaissance Project, which was used to support the ‘agricultural colonisation’ hypothesis proposed by Bradley Parker, and compare this with evidence obtained from other surveys conducted in Syro-Mesopotamia and the southern Levant.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt and Assyria in Isaiah 11:11–16
    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections EGYPT AND ASSYRIA IN ISAIAH 11:11–16 Dan’el Kahn Department of Biblical studies, university of Haifa ABSTRACT In the following article I will deal with one of Isaiah’s prophecies, Isaiah 11:11–16, whose date is debated. In this article, I will concur that the prophecy is not original to Isaiah, nor was there an early Isaianic core that was expanded in later periods. Other scholars suggested different dates for the prophecy, ranging from the reign of Josiah at the end of the Assyrian rule in the Levant until the Hasmonean Period. I will forward a different historical setting to the oracle than the hitherto given options. According to this understanding, the oracle was composed in the mid-7th century BCE and reflects the political situation during the reigns of Ashurbanipal, King of Assyria, and Manasseh, King of Judah, respectively. I DEDICATE THE ArTICLE, WHICH WAs WrITTEn In HospITAL, To THE mEmory of my BELovED son, JonATHAn KAHn z”L, WHo unTImELy pAssED AWAy on THE 17TH of AprIL 2012 AT THE AgE of 8. mAy HE rEsT In pEACE. 1. T HE CONTEXT OF THE PROPHECY 2. T HE DATE OF ISAIAH 11: 11–12 The prophecy is part of a collection of four prophecies 2.1. D urIng IsAIAH ’s TImE and it shall many commentators, who date the prophecy to the days“ “ והיה ביום ההוא “ introduced by the formula come to pass in that day.” These oracles announce the of Isaiah (ca. 734–701 BCE), 4 claim that the list of toponyms future relief of Assyrian oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanun of Ammon Provokes a War (C. 997 BC) The
    © 2021 Nathan E. Brown June 11 – OT Chronological Synopsis – NASB Version comeafterme.com Hanun of Ammon Provokes a War (c. 997 BC) 2 Samuel 10:1–6 1 Chronicles 19:1–7 1 Now it happened afterwards 1 Now it came about after this, that the king of the Ammonites died, that Nahash the king of the sons of Ammon died, and Hanun his son became king in his place. and his son became king in his place. 2 Then David said, “I will show kindness to Hanun 2 Then David said, “I will show kindness to Hanun the son of Nahash, just as his father showed the son of Nahash, because his father showed kindness to me.” So David sent some of his servants kindness to me.” So David sent messengers to console him concerning his father. But when to console him concerning his father. And David’s servants came to the land David’s servants came into the land of the sons of the Ammonites, of Ammon to Hanun to console him. 3 the princes of the Ammonites said to 3 But the princes of the sons of Ammon said to Hanun their lord, “Do you think that David is Hanun, “Do you think that David is honoring your father because he has sent consolers honoring your father, in that he has sent comforters to you? Has David not sent his servants to you to you? Have not his servants come to you in order to search the city, to search to spy it out and overthrow it?” and to overthrow and to spy out the land?” 4 So Hanun took David’s servants 4 So Hanun took David’s servants and shaved off half of their beards, and shaved them and cut off their garments in the middle and cut off their garments in the middle as far as their hips, and sent them away.
    [Show full text]