DOCSLIB.ORG

Sutton Link Consultation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sutton Link Consultation Report Sutton Link Consultation Report April 2019 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 7 2. About the consultation ...................................................................................... 10 2.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Consultation history ...................................................................................... 10 2.3 TfL’s consultation - Who we consulted ......................................................... 10 2.4 Dates and duration ....................................................................................... 10 2.5 What we asked ............................................................................................. 11 2.6 Methods of responding ................................................................................. 11 2.7 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................. 11 2.8 Equalities Assessment ................................................................................. 14 2.9 Analysis of consultation responses .............................................................. 15 3. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 16 3.1 Number of respondents ................................................................................ 16 3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation ........................................... 16 3.3 Respondent type .......................................................................................... 17 3.4 Demographics .............................................................................................. 17 3.5 Postcode analysis ........................................................................................ 20 4. Summary of all consultation responses ............................................................ 24 4.1 Support or Opposition for the proposals in-principle .................................... 24 4.2 Route Options .............................................................................................. 25 4.3 Transport Options ........................................................................................ 31 4.4 Quality of Consultation ................................................................................. 36 4.5 List of responding stakeholders .................................................................... 36 5. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 44 List of figures Figure 1 Sutton Link route options .................................................................................. 6 Figure 2 Table to show the number and type of respondents ...................................... 16 Figure 3 How respondents heard about the consultation ............................................. 16 Figure 4 Number of respondents by respondent type .................................................. 17 Figure 5 Gender of respondents................................................................................... 17 Figure 6 Age of respondents ........................................................................................ 18 Figure 7 Ethnicity of respondents ................................................................................. 18 Figure 8 Sexual orientation of respondents .................................................................. 19 Figure 9 Faith of respondents....................................................................................... 19 Figure 10 Number of respondents who considered that they had a health problem or disability ....................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 11 The number of respondents from the top 10 most represented postcode areas ............................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 12 Distribution of respondents by area .............................................................. 21 Figure 13 Map to show respondents in the Sutton and Merton areas by their in-principle support to the Sutton Link ............................................................................................ 23 Figure 14 In-principle support and opposition to the Sutton Link .................................. 24 Figure 15 Support and opposition to each route option ................................................ 25 Figure 16 Issues of importance to respondents and which influenced their support or opposition to each route option .................................................................................... 26 Figure 17 Route preference ......................................................................................... 30 Figure 18 Top 10 most frequently raised issues about the route options ..................... 30 Figure 19 Support and opposition for each transport option ......................................... 31 Figure 20 Issues of importance to respondents and which influenced their support or opposition to each transport option .............................................................................. 32 Figure 21 Overall transport option preference .............................................................. 35 Figure 22 Top 10 most frequently raised issues about the transport options ............... 35 Figure 23 Views on the quality of the consultation ....................................................... 36 Executive summary We have been working closely with the London Boroughs of Sutton and Merton to investigate options to improve public transport connectivity and support growth within the boroughs. Our project is called the Sutton Link and it is intended to provide a new direct and quicker transport link between Sutton and Merton. We held a consultation from 31 October to 6 January 2019, and asked respondents whether or not they supported the Sutton Link in principle. We also asked which of the route and transport options they supported and provided the means for them to raise other issues of concern, so that we could take these into account as we continued the scheme development process. There were 5,980 responses to the consultation in total. There was significant support for the Sutton Link in principle. A total of 86 per cent of respondents supported or strongly supported the scheme, although some respondents objected in principle to our proposals. Amongst other questions, we asked respondents the extent to which they supported or opposed each of the three route options we included in our consultation. We found that: 65 per cent of respondents supported or strongly supported Option 1 (South Wimbledon – Sutton) 55 per cent of respondents supported or strongly supported Option 2 (Colliers Wood – Sutton) 49 per cent of respondents supported or strongly supported Option 3 (Wimbledon – Sutton) We also asked respondents the extent to which they supported or opposed each of the transport options we included. We found that: 81 per cent of respondents supported or strongly supported the Tram option 40 per cent of respondents supported or strongly supported the Bus Rapid Transit option We identified over 350 separate issues raised by respondents. In very broad terms these issues were concerned with: General support or opposition to the Sutton Link in principle, for example raising concerns about potential negative impacts (including environmental impacts, funding concerns or impacts on other road users), or by noting the benefits some people thought the link could provide Positive or negative issues regarding each route specifically, and additionally about each of the transport options included in the consultation Issues which respondents wished us to bear in mind as we develop more detailed proposals for the Sutton Link 1. About the proposals 1.1 Introduction Working with the boroughs of Sutton and Merton, we undertook an option selection process to determine which public transport options would best meet the project objectives, while remaining in line with the wider policy context, including the Mayor’s Transport Strategy. Five options, which included a combination of three route and two mode options – Tram and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – were shortlisted. Our consultation described the three shortlisted routes and two transport modes identified as the best options for the Sutton Link. Our materials included a description of the alignment and the pros and cons of each route, including potential journey times, interchanges with existing services, challenges for construction and potential impacts on parks and open space; among other considerations. We also included a comparison between Tram and BRT, with details of the similarities and differences between the two modes. The alignment for the shortlisted route options is shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 Sutton Link route options 1.2 Purpose The Sutton Link would create
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4203 SLT Brochure 6/21/04 19:08 Page 1
    4203 SLT brochure 6/21/04 19:08 Page 1 South London Trams Transport for Everyone The case for extensions to Tramlink 4203 SLT brochure 6/21/04 19:09 Page 2 South London Trams Introduction South London Partnership Given the importance of good Tramlink is a highly successful integrated transport and the public transport system. It is is the strategic proven success of Tramlink reliable, frequent and fast, offers a partnership for south in the region, South London high degree of personal security, Partnership together with the is well used and highly regarded. London. It promotes London Borough of Lambeth has the interests of south established a dedicated lobby This document sets out the case group – South London Trams – for extensions to the tram London as a sub-region to promote extensions to the network in south London. in its own right and as a Tramlink network in south London, drawing on the major contributor to the widespread public and private development of London sector support for trams and as a world class city. extensions in south London. 4203 SLT brochure 6/21/04 19:09 Page 4 South London Trams Transport for Everyone No need for a ramp operated by the driver “Light rail delivers The introduction of Tramlink has The tram has also enabled Integration is key to Tramlink’s been hugely beneficial for its local previously isolated local residents success. Extending Tramlink fast, frequent and south London community. It serves to travel to jobs, training, leisure provides an opportunity for the reliable services and the whole of the community, with and cultural activities – giving wider south London community trams – unlike buses and trains – them a greater feeling of being to enjoy these benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Tram Potential
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com JULY 2019 NO. 979 GROWING LONDON’S TRAM POTENTIAL Brussels congress debates urban rail safety and sustainability Doha launches Metro Red line service US raises Chinese security concerns India plans ‘Metrolite’ for smaller cities Canberra Energy efficiency £4.60 Realising a 100-year Reduced waste and light rail ambition greater profitability 2019 ENTRIES OPEN NOW! SUPPORTED BY ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 244 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 263 JULY 2019 Vol. 82 No. 979 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin [email protected] 256 NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] NEWS 244 saving energy, saVING COST 258 Doha opens Metro Red line; US politicians Len Vossman explains some of the current DESIGN – Debbie Nolan raise Chinese security concerns; Brussels initiatives driving tramway and metro ADVertiSING celebrates ‘tramway 150’; Arizona’s Valley energy efficiency. COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 Metro extends to Gilbert Rd; Bombardier [email protected] UK to build new Cairo monorail; Luas-style SYSTEMS FACTFILE: london trams 263 PUBLISheR – Matt Johnston system proposed for Ireland’s Cork; Neil Pulling looks at developments on the Kent-Essex tramway is feasible; India UK network formerly known as Tramlink.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutton Link, Sutton Local Committee
    Sutton Link, Sutton Local Committee Daniel Doris - Major Scheme Programme Manager 6th September 2018 Background ● The Tram extension has been part of strategic planning policy for over 20 years. It is part of a shared aspiration to address the public transport deficit in South London, and support high quality sub-regional economic growth. ● Since 2013, Sutton and Merton have been working in collaboration with TfL, to undertake the necessary feasibility work to deliver the extension. ● A public consultation carried out by Sutton and Merton, supported by TfL, in 2014 received over 10,000 responses with 84% of people supporting the extension. In addition the scheme features in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy and Sutton’s Local Plan. ● TfL has publically committed £70m funding (from the Growth Fund). Furthermore, TfL have committed to undertaking the necessary feasibility works required to deliver a Transport & Works Act Order (TWAO) which is necessary to gain consent to deliver the scheme. The Benefits ● Extending the Tram network to Sutton would have a range of benefits for residents and businesses across south London addressing the lack of public transport investment in this part of outer London. ● The on road alignment (from Morden Road to Sutton Station, via St Helier Hospital) could improve access to Transport to 59,000* people in some of Sutton and Merton’s most deprived wards. ● It could facilitate the connections between key interchanges, such as Sutton station, Morden underground (Northern Line) and Wimbledon (National Rail Services and the District Line), improving connectivity for residents in both boroughs across south London and to central London.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl Interchange Signs Standard
    Transport for London Interchange signs standard Issue 5 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London 1 Interchange signs standard Contents 1 Introduction 3 Directional signs and wayfinding principles 1.1 Types of interchange sign 3.1 Directional signing at Interchanges 1.2 Core network symbols 3.2 Directional signing to networks 1.3 Totem signs 3.3 Incorporating service information 1.3 Horizontal format 3.4 Wayfinding sequence 1.4 Network identification within interchanges 3.5 Accessible routes 1.5 Pictograms 3.6 Line diagrams – Priciples 3.7 Line diagrams – Line representation 3.8 Line diagrams – Symbology 3.9 Platform finders Specific networks : 2 3.10 Platform confirmation signs National Rail 2.1 3.11 Platform station names London Underground 2.2 3.12 Way out signs Docklands Light Railway 2.3 3.13 Multiple exits London Overground 2.4 3.14 Linking with Legible London London Buses 2.5 3.15 Exit guides 2.6 London Tramlink 3.16 Exit guides – Decision points 2.7 London Coach Stations 3.17 Exit guides on other networks 2.8 London River Services 3.18 Signing to bus services 2.9 Taxis 3.19 Signing to bus services – Route changes 2.10 Cycles 3.20 Viewing distances 3.21 Maintaining clear sightlines 4 References and contacts Interchange signing standard Issue 5 1 Introduction Contents Good signing and information ensure our customers can understand Londons extensive public transport system and can make journeys without undue difficulty and frustruation. At interchanges there may be several networks, operators and line identities which if displayed together without consideration may cause confusion for customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Croydon Tramlink Derailment on 9 November 2016 1
    Safety, Sustainability and Human Resources Panel Date: 17 November 2016 Item: Croydon Tramlink Derailment on 9 November 2016 1 Summary 1.1 This item will provide an update on the Croydon Tramlink derailment on 9 November 2016. 1.2 The incident occurred on the day of publication of the agenda and papers for this meeting and accordingly an update will be provided at the meeting. 2 Recommendation 2.1 The Panel is asked to note this paper. List of appendices to this report: Presentation on Croydon Tramlink Derailment List of Background Papers: None. Contact: Leon Daniels, Managing Director, Surface Transport Number: 020 3054 0180 Email: [email protected] 1 THURSDAY 17 NOVEMBER Croydon Tramlink derailment on 9 November 2016 2 CROYDON TRAMLINK DERAILMENT What happened At 06:07 on Wednesday 9 November, tram 2551 was travelling from New Addington to Sandilands As it came out of the tunnel section, it began to follow the turn in the track but as it did so it derailed and subsequently turned onto its right side Emergency services – London Ambulance Service, London Fire Brigade and British Transport Police – were contacted and responded swiftly Tragically, this resulted in seven fatalities and 51 injuries requiring hospital treatment Rails and electrical equipment in the area suffered significant infrastructure damage 3 CROYDON TRAMLINK DERAILMENT Location To Beckenham Junction/Elmers End Site of incident Sandilands tramstop Direction of travel To New Addington To Croydon/Wimbledon 4 CROYDON TRAMLINK DERAILMENT Our immediate response Following
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan 2019 Inspector's Report
    Report to the Mayor of London by Roisin Barrett BSc (Hons) MSc Dip UD Dip Hist Cons MRTPI IHBC William Fieldhouse BA (Hons) MRTPI and David Smith BA (Hons) DMS MRTPI Members of the Panel appointed by the Secretary of State Date: 8 October 2019 Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended) Part VIII Report of the Examination in Public of the London Plan 2019 The Examination in Public was held between 15 January 2019 and 22 May 2019 File Ref: PINS/SDS0026 London Plan Examination in Public: Panel Report October 2019 Contents Page Abbreviations used in the report 4 Non technical summary 5 Introduction 6 • The draft new London Plan and the Mayor’s minor and further 6 suggested changes • Examination in public and Panel recommendations 6 • National planning policy 7 Legal, Procedural and General Matters 9 • Cooperation and public participation 9 • Sustainability appraisal 11 • Habitat regulations assessment 12 • Equality of opportunity 13 • Climate change 14 • Spatial Development Strategy 15 Assessment of Soundness 19 • Vision, objectives and Good Growth 19 • Resources, viability and delivery 21 • Strategic approach to accommodating development 25 • Wider south east 28 • Opportunity Areas and Regeneration Areas 30 • Housing need 33 • Housing and Good Growth 34 • Housing targets 35 • Gypsy and traveller accommodation 43 • Affordable housing 45 • Other housing policies 49 • Housing quality and standards 58 • Design policies 60 • Heritage and culture policies 71 • Social infrastructure policies 75 • Central Activities Zone 81 • Town centres, retail
    [Show full text]
  • Aviva Investors
    CBRE Limited Henrietta House Henrietta Place London W1G 0NB Switchboard +44 (0)20 7182 2000 Direct +44 (0)20 7182 2703 Tara Butler FutureMerton Team [email protected] London Borough of Merton London Road Morden SM4 5DX 3 January 2019 Dear Ms Butler, LONDON BOROUGH OF MERTON STAGE 2 LOCAL PLAN 2020 - REPRESENTATIONS ON BEHALF OF AVIVA INVESTORS CBRE Limited is instructed by our client, Aviva Investors, to submit representations in response to the Emerging Merton Local Plan 2020 Consultation published on 31st October 2018. Introduction Aviva Investors is a global asset manager whose breadth of expertise span across numerous markets, including real estate. As of June 2018, Aviva Investors manages over £488 billion of assets for its customers, this includes vast real estate portfolios and significant land holdings across London. Aviva Investors recognises the importance of the London Borough of Merton’s Emerging Local Plan 2020 for guiding development across the Borough, and welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on its content. The observations and recommendations made within these representations are of a specific nature, relating to landholdings at Merton Industrial Estate, Morden Road, SW19 3BL (hereafter ‘the site’). The site comprises one of Aviva Investors’ highest performing assets, and the content of the Local Plan 2020 is of great importance to ensuring that its success continues. Merton industrial Estate The site is situated within the Abbey Ward of the London Borough of Merton and is circa 8ha in area. The site is currently one of the best performing industrial assets across Aviva Investor’s portfolio, and accommodates a mix of industrial warehousing, trade warehousing and big box retail totalling 383,000 sq ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail Environmental Statement 8A
    Crossrail Environmental Statement Volume 8a Appendices Transport assessment: methodology and principal findings 8a If you would like information about Crossrail in your language, please contact Crossrail supplying your name and postal address and please state the language or format that you require. To request information about Crossrail contact details: in large print, Braille or audio cassette, Crossrail FREEPOST NAT6945 please contact Crossrail. London SW1H0BR Email: [email protected] Helpdesk: 0845 602 3813 (24-hours, 7-days a week) Crossrail Environmental Statement Volume 8A – Appendices Transport Assessment: Methodology and Principal Findings February 2005 This volume of the Transport Assessment Report is produced by Mott MacDonald – responsible for assessment of temporary impacts for the Central and Eastern route sections and for editing and co-ordination; Halcrow – responsible for assessment of permanent impacts route-wide; Scott Wilson – responsible for assessment of temporary impacts for the Western route section; and Faber Maunsell – responsible for assessment of temporary and permanent impacts in the Tottenham Court Road East station area, … working with the Crossrail Planning Team. Mott MacDonald St Anne House, 20–26 Wellesley Road, Croydon, Surrey CR9 2UL, United Kingdom www.mottmac.com Halcrow Group Limited Vineyard House, 44 Brook Green, Hammersmith, London W6 7BY, United Kingdom www.halcrow.com Scott Wilson 8 Greencoat Place, London SW1P 1PL, United Kingdom This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald, Halcrow, Scott www.scottwilson.com Wilson and Faber Maunsell being obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • London Trams Table of Contents
    Rail Vehicle Accessibility: Exemption Application London Trams Table of Contents Foreword..............................................................................................................................3 Passenger Doorway Audible Warning Devices.................................................................4 Internal Passenger Information Displays ..........................................................................8 Handrail Clearances, Door Lighting, Floor Obstruction .................................................12 Page 2 of 17 Foreword The 24 Bombardier CR4000 trams entered service in 2000 at which time the Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations (RVAR) 1998 was in force, with the newer 12 Stadler Variobahn trams entering service in 2012, 2015 and 2016. RVAR 2010 came into force on 6th April 2010. The following year Transport for London (TfL) commissioned a review of the Bombardier CR4000 fleet against the Requirements of RVAR 2010. Since the 2011 review several work streams have been carried out to make modifications to the trams to address the areas of non-compliance. However due to the prioritisation of maintenance activities to ensure availability of the required number of trams to meet service each day and safety related works; all the necessary modifications to the trams have not taken place. Operating within tight budgetary constraints has also led to the de-scoping of works items, and often meant the non- availability of budget for works to take place. A further review against the Requirements was performed in August 2019, during which several of the open items on the Bombardier CR4000 were closed, with a few remaining non-compliant. A few instances of non-compliance were also noted on the newer Stadler Trams. Subsequently London Trams has compiled the following application for time limited and permanent exemptions against the remaining areas of non-compliance against the Requirements. Page 3 of 17 Passenger Doorway Audible Warning Devices 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 5
    Agenda Item 5 Questions to the Mayor Mayor's Question Time, 19 March 2020 PRIORITY ORDER PAPER Report No: 5 Subject: Questions to the Mayor Report of: Executive Director of Secretariat Environment Bill Question No: 2020/1254 Leonie Cooper The Government’s Environment Bill is currently making its way through Parliament. Does it meet London’s needs? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Question No: 2020/1445 David Kurten To what extent do you support equality, diversity and inclusion in London? London Safety Question No: 2020/1130 Shaun Bailey Do you think Londoners feel more safe now, than when you first took office? Live facial recognition in London Question No: 2020/1442 Siân Berry Are you satisfied with the use of facial recognition in London? Page 1 Women’s Equality Question No: 2020/1383 Joanne McCartney With UN Secretary-General António Guterres, stating that the 21st century must be the century of women’s equality, what action have you taken to transform London by ensuring equal participation for all? Future victims of crime Question No: 2020/1144 Susan Hall Do you stand by your comment that “I would rather invest in future Daves and Stormzys than future victims of crime”? Health inequalities – a widening gap Question No: 2020/1393 Onkar Sahota What further action is needed in London to reverse the trend of increasingly unequal health outcomes between the rich and poor in society, as put so starkly in Sir Michael Marmot’s recent review? Is London Open? Question No: 2020/1078 Andrew Boff Is London Open? Crossrail Question No: 2020/1441 Caroline Pidgeon Are you confident that Crossrail will open in Summer 2021? Mayoral appointments Question No: 2020/1158 Tony Arbour Do you have any regrets regarding your decisions on Mayoral appointments? Page 2 Anti-Social Behaviour Question No: 2020/1298 Unmesh Desai Understandably and rightly so, the MPS is currently focused upon reducing the levels of serious violence in the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Merton Council
    Committee: CABINET Date: 21st September 2009 Agenda item: 6 Wards: All Wards Subject: S.106 Planning Obligations Report Quarter 1 2009/10 Lead officer: John Hill, Head of Public Protection & Development Lead member: Councillor William Brierly, Planning and Traffic Management Forward Plan reference number: 825 Contact officer: Tim Catley (S.106 General Enquiries); Ashley Heller (Enquires in relation to the Wimbledon Station Access Scheme) Recommendations: A. THE CONTRIBUTIONS MADE BY S.106 AGREEMENTS OR ANY OTHER ENABLING AGREEMENT BE NOTED. B. THAT S.106 FUNDING TOTALING £248,310 BE ALLOCATED TO THE WIMBLEDON STATION ACCESS SCHEME 1 PURPOSE OF REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. This report summarises the situation in relation to S.106 agreements for the 1st quarter 2009/10. 1.2. £511,107 has been committed to the council in monetary obligations for Quarter 1. A list of agreements signed during Quarter 1 can be found at Appendix B. 1.3. £65,722 was received in Quarter 1. A breakdown can be found at item 2.6. 1.4. £45,299 was spent from S.106 funds in Quarter 1. Please refer to Appendix C for breakdown. 1.5. £1,595,735 is unallocated and remains available from S.106 income. Please refer to Appendix D. 1.6. To approve the proposed use of S.106 funds towards the Wimbledon Station Access Scheme. 2 DETAILS 2.1. S.106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) permits Local Planning Authorities to enter into agreements with applicants for planning permission to regulate the use and development of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan 2019/20 to 2023/24 About Transport for London (Tfl)
    Transport for London Business Plan 2019/20 to 2023/24 About Transport for London (TfL) Part of the Greater London Authority We are moving ahead with many of family led by Mayor of London Sadiq London’s most significant infrastructure Khan, we are the integrated transport projects, using transport to unlock growth. authority responsible for delivering the We are working with partners on major Mayor’s aims for transport. projects like Crossrail 2 and the Bakerloo Line Extension that will deliver the new We have a key role in shaping what homes and jobs London and the UK need. life is like in London, helping to realise We are in the final phases of completing the the Mayor’s vision for a ‘City for All Elizabeth line which, when open, will add 10 Londoners’. We are committed to per cent to central London’s rail capacity. creating a fairer, greener, healthier and more prosperous city. The Mayor’s Supporting the delivery of high-density, Transport Strategy sets a target for 80 mixed-use developments that are per cent of all journeys to be made on planned around active and sustainable foot, by cycle or using public transport travel will ensure that London’s growth is by 2041. To make this a reality, we good growth. We also use our own land prioritise health and the quality of to provide thousands of new affordable people’s experience in everything we do. homes and our own supply chain creates tens of thousands of jobs and We manage the city’s red route strategic apprenticeships across the country.
    [Show full text]