Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 1 Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 What is a River Basin Restoration Priority? 2 Criteria for Selecting a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 3 Lumber River Basin Overview 4 Lumber River Basin Restoration Goals 5 Lumber River Basin with TLW Map 8 Targeted Local Watershed Summary Table 9 Discussion of TLWs in the Lumber River Basin 11 References 39 For More Information 39 Definition of Terms 40 This document was updated by Michele Drostin, eastern watershed planner. Cover Photo: Mountain Creek - Hoke County Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 2 Introduction This document, prepared by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), presents a description of Targeted Local Watersheds within the Lumber River Basin. This is an update of the original document developed in 2003 by the Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP), Lumber River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan, December 2003. This plan reviews the whole Lumber River Basin (USGS Catalog Units 03040203, 03040204, 03040206 and 03040207). The original plan selected 20 watersheds to be targeted for stream, wetland and riparian buffer restoration and protection and watershed planning efforts. In 2005, an additional 4 watersheds were identified as Targeted Local Watersheds and addressed in the Lockwoods Folly Local Watershed Plan. This document presents an additional 5 Targeted Local Watersheds. This document is a supplement to the Lumber River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan, December 2003 and draws information from the detailed document, 2003 Lumber River Basinwide Water Quality Plan and the NCDENR Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Lumber River Basin - April 2007. Therefore, this document does not provide detailed information found in those documents but provides a quick overview of EEP, the criteria EEP uses to select new Targeted Local Watersheds and then describes the newly selected Targeted Local Watersheds. In past documents, watersheds were delineated by the NCDWQ “subbasin” units and the smaller Targeted Local Watersheds were defined by NRCS 14-digit hydrologic unit (HU). In this document, the watersheds are defined by the USGS 8-digit cataloging units and the Targeted Local Watersheds continue to be defined by the NRCS 14-digit hydrologic unit. What is a North Carolina General Statute 143-214.10 charges EEP to pursue River Basin wetland and riparian restoration activities in the context of basin restoration plans, one for each of the 17 major river basins in the State, Restoration with the goal of protecting and enhancing water quality, fisheries, wildlife Priority? habitat, recreational opportunities and preventing floods. EEP develops River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRPs) to guide its mitigation activities within each of the major river basins. The RBRPs delineate specific watersheds that exhibit a need for restoration and protection of wetlands, streams and riparian buffers. These priority watersheds, or Targeted Local Watersheds (TLWs), are 14-digit hydrologic units which receive priority for EEP planning and project funds. The designation may also benefit stakeholders writing watershed Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 3 improvement grants (e.g., Section 319 or Clean Water Management Trust Fund) by giving added weight to their proposals. EEP evaluates a variety of GIS data and resource and planning documents Criteria for on water quality and habitat conditions in each river basin to select TLWs. selecting Public comment and the professional judgment of local resource agency Targeted staff also play a critical role in targeting local watersheds. TLWs are chosen based on an evaluation of three factors—problems, assets, and Local opportunities. Problems reflect the need for restoration, assets reflect the Watersheds ability for a watershed to recover from degradation and the need for land conservation, and opportunity indicates the potential for local partnerships in restoration and conservation work. Problems: EEP evaluates DWQ use support ratings, the presence of impaired /303(d)-listed streams, and DWQ Basinwide Assessment reports to identify streams with known problems. EEP also assesses the potential for degradation by evaluating land cover data, riparian buffer condition, impervious cover, proposed transportation projects and projected population increase. Assets: In order to gauge the natural resource value of each watershed, EEP considers the amount of forested land, land in public or private conservation, riparian buffer condition, high quality resource waters, and natural heritage elements. Opportunity: EEP reviews restoration and protection projects that are already on the ground, such as Clean Water Management Trust Fund projects, US Clean Water Act Section 319 projects, and land conservation projects. EEP also considers the potential for partnership opportunities by consulting with local, state, and federal resource agencies and conservation organizations, identifying their priority areas. Local Resource Professional Comments/Recommendations: The comments and recommendations of local resource agency professionals, including staff with Soil & Water Conservation districts, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), county planning staff, NCDENR regional staff (e.g., Wildlife Resources Commission), and local/regional land trusts and watershed organizations are considered heavily in the selection of Targeted Local Watersheds. Local resource professionals often have specific and up-to-date information regarding the condition of local streams and wetlands. Furthermore, local resource professionals may be involved in local water resource protection initiatives that provide good partnership opportunities for EEP restoration and preservation projects and Local Watershed Planning initiatives. Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 4 The Lumber River basin encompasses an area of 3,343 square miles in all Lumber River or part of 10 counties including Brunswick, Columbus, Bladen, Robeson, Basin Cumberland, Hoke, Scotland, Richmond, Moore and Montgomery. Larger Overview municipalities include Lumberton, Laurinburg, Southern Pines, Pinehurst and Whiteville. Though defined as one basin, there are actually four different watersheds in the Lumber River Basin. These are the Lumber River, the Waccamaw River, the headwaters of the Little Pee Dee and the coastal watershed of the Shalotte /Lockwoods Folly Rivers. The Lumber River begins at the headwaters known as Drowning Creek, in the counties of Moore and Montgomery, in the Sandhills ecoregion. This area is largely forested with the populations in the upper portion of the basin primarily concentrated around Southern Pines, Pinehurst and Aberdeen. Naked Creek and Rocky Ford Branch are listed as Outstanding Resource Waters. The main stem of the Lumber River lies in the Coastal Plain ecoregion. The Lumber River State Park contains 7,937 acres of land along the main stem. A total of 115 miles of the Lumber River is of State Natural and Scenic Water designation and 81 miles have also been designated as a National Wild and Scenic Water. The Lumber River flows through Lumberton, a highly-developed urban area. The river crosses the boarder near Fair Bluff. Just pass the border, the Lumber River joins the Little Pee Dee River which will flow to the Pee Dee River and drain to Winyah Bay. Waccamaw River Watershed contains Lake Waccamaw State Park. Lake Waccamaw is the largest natural bay lake in southeastern North Carolina. Below Lake Waccamaw, the river flows through the largest remaining cypress/tupelo-gum blackwater swamp in North Carolina. Though not hydrologically connected in North Carolina to the Lumber River, the Waccamaw River also joins with the Pee Dee River in South Carolina. The headwaters of the Little Pee Dee are located in the counties of Scotland, Robeson and part of Richmond. This is a small watershed defined by sandy substrate. The City of Laurinburg and Town of Maxton are the largest populated areas in this watershed. Finally, included in the delineation of the Lumber River Basin is a sub- basin which includes the Shalotte River and Lockwoods Folly River. The watersheds of these two rivers are contained within Brunswick County and drain directly to the Atlantic Ocean. This watershed is primarily forested but Brunswick County is one of the fastest growing counties in the state. Primary concerns in this watershed center around nutrients and fecal coliform in the estuarine system. Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 5 The Lumber River Basin contains four USGS 8-digit Catalog Units (03040203, 03040204, 03040206 and 03040207) and 102 NRCS 14-digit Hydrologic Units. The original plan selected 20 watersheds to be targeted for stream, wetland and riparian buffer restoration and protection and watershed planning efforts. In 2005, an additional 4 watersheds were identified as Targeted Local Watersheds and addressed in the Lockwoods Folly Local Watershed Plan. This document presents an additional 5 Targeted Local Watersheds. Lumber River Based on an assessment of existing watershed characteristics and resource information, EEP has developed restoration goals for the Lumber River Basin Basin. The goals have been broken down by 8-digit CU, in order to better Restoration describe more specific goals. The goals reflect EEP’s focus on restoring Goals wetland and stream functions such as maintaining and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish and wildlife habitat. 03040203 (Lumber
Recommended publications
  • Lake Waccamaw Subtype)
    NATURAL LAKE SHORELINE SWAMP (LAKE WACCAMAW SUBTYPE) Concept: Type covers tree-dominated vegetated wetland vegetation on the shores of medium to large permanent natural lakes. It extends inland to where the effect of lake hydrology on vegetation is replaced by the hydrology of the surrounding area, either upland or wetland. Subtype covers the unique calcareous example at Lake Waccamaw. The vegetation resembles that of the Cypress Subtype but has a distinctive and richer flora. Sites: Wetland zones along the shore of Lake Waccamaw, influenced by the calcareous waters, generally flooded much of the time by lake waters but exposed at low water levels. Soils: A specific soil series is not mapped, but soils are sand, presumably worked by wave action. Hydrology: Permanently to seasonally flooded. Water levels may vary over periods of a few years, in response to weather cycles. Vegetation: Open woodland of Taxodium ascendens. There are a few shrubs, including Alnus serrulata, Cephalanthus occidentalis, and Cyrilla racemiflora. The herb layer is patchy, with dense beds of graminoids, areas of sparse emergent or submersed plants, and a number of species that are visible only when water levels are low and the shoreline is exposed. The denser areas are dominated by Panicum hemitomon and Cladium mariscoides. Dominants in smaller patches include Eleocharis olivacea, Sclerolepis uniflora, and Centella erecta, and Boltonia asteroides and Ludwigia sphaerocarpa are abundant. A great diversity of other herbaceous species is present, including Andropogon
    [Show full text]
  • 15A Ncac 02B .0100-.0300
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Division of Water Resources Administrative Code Section: 15A NCAC 02B .0100: Procedures for Assignment of Water Quality Standards 15A NCAC 02B .0200: Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina 15A NCAC 02B .0300: Assignment of Stream Classifications Amended Effective: November 1, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA This document available at: https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/csrrb/tri_rev_17to19/15A_NCAC_02B_.0100- .0300.pdf SUBCHAPTER 02B - SURFACE WATER AND WETLAND STANDARDS SECTION .0100 - PROCEDURES FOR ASSIGNMENT OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 15A NCAC 02B .0101 GENERAL PROCEDURES (a) The rules contained in Sections .0100, .0200 and .0300 of this Subchapter, which pertain to the series of classifications and water quality standards, shall be known as the "Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina." (b) The Environmental Management Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), prior to classifying and assigning standards of water quality to any waters of the State, shall proceed as follows: (1) The Commission, or its designee, shall determine waters to be studied for the purpose of classification and assignment of water quality standards on the basis of user requests, petitions, or the identification of existing or attainable water uses, as defined by Rule .0202 of this Subchapter, not presently included in the water classification. (2) In determining the best usage of waters and assigning classifications of such waters, the Commission shall consider the criteria specified in G.S. 143-214.1(d). In determining whether to revise a designated best usage for waters through a revision to the classifications, the Commission shall follow the requirements of 40 CFR 131.10 which is incorporated by reference including subsequent amendments and editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare
    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
    [Show full text]
  • Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan
    Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan South Carolina Department of Natural Resources February 2017 Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan Prepared by Lorianne Riggin and Bob Perry1, and Dr. Scott Howard2 February 2017 Acknowledgements The preparers thank the following South Carolina Department of Natural Resources staff for their special expertise and contributions toward the completion of this report: Heritage Trust data base manager Julie Holling; GIS applications manager Tyler Brown for mapping and listing of protected properties; archeologist Sean Taylor for information on cultural resources; fisheries biologists Kevin Kubach, Jason Marsik, and Robert Stroud for information regarding aquatic resources; hydrologist Andy Wachob for information on hydrologic resources; and wildlife biologists James Fowler, Dean Harrigal, Sam Stokes, Jr. and Amy Tegler for information regarding wildlife resources. 1 South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Office of Environmental Programs. 2 South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey. i Little Pee Dee-Lumber Focus Area Conservation Plan The goal of this conservation plan is to provide science-based guidance for future decisions to protect natural resource, riparian corridors and traditional landscape uses such as fish and wildlife management, hunting, fishing, agriculture and forestry. Such planning is valuable in the context of protecting Waters of the United States in accordance with the Clean Water Act, particularly when the interests of economic development and protection of natural and cultural resources collide. Such planning is vital in the absence of specific watershed planning. As additional information is gathered by the focus area partners, and as further landscape-scale conservation goals are achieved, this plan will be updated accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Forest Magazine Offers a 70 Class Notes Series of Milestones Along with the Millstones in the Story of Women at the University
    CAMPUS DURING COVID-19 | WFU WOMEN: A HISTORY OF THEIR OWN | KAREN BAYNES-DUNNING (’89): UNDAUNTED SPRING 2021 R E A D I N G t h e R I V E R THE MAGAZINE OF WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY FEATURES 38 COPING IN THE PANDEMIC Photography by Ken Bennett Wake Forest’s director of photography captured the first month of the fall semester, when campus community members embraced “Show Humanitate.” 2 52 READING THE RIVER LESSONS FROM A TIME OF By Carol L. Hanner UPHEAVAL Yadkin Riverkeeper Brian Fannon (’89) By Kerry M. King (’85) combines biology, history and a love of water Six alumni reflect on student life in the for his exceptional life in the flow. 1960s and early ’70s and how 2020 echoes those times. 18 88 UNDAUNTED CONSTANT & TRUE By Maria Henson (’82) By Sophie Hollis (’19) Karen Baynes-Dunning (’89) infuses arduous A young grad learns about isolation and work for social justice and children’s progress reaching out in a pandemic. with lessons from wondrous family lore. 34 DEPARTMENTS A HISTORY OF THEIR OWN 66 Around the Quad Illustration by Lisa Perrin As women move into their second century of 69 Philanthropy voting rights, Wake Forest Magazine offers a 70 Class Notes series of milestones along with the millstones in the story of women at the University. WAKEFOREST FROM theh PRESIDENT MAGAZINE 2019 ROBERT SIBLEY this issue of wake forest magazine is the first of 2021, a year MAGAZINE OF THE YEAR that will mark the University’s continuing challenges with the COVID-19 pandemic and an upcoming personal milestone for me and my wife, Julie.
    [Show full text]
  • Waccamaw River Blue Trail
    ABOUT THE WACCAMAW RIVER BLUE TRAIL The Waccamaw River Blue Trail extends the entire length of the river in North and South Carolina. Beginning near Lake Waccamaw, a permanently inundated Carolina Bay, the river meanders through the Waccamaw River Heritage Preserve, City of Conway, and Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge before merging with the Intracoastal Waterway where it passes historic rice fields, Brookgreen Gardens, Sandy Island, and ends at Winyah Bay near Georgetown. Over 140 miles of river invite the paddler to explore its unique natural, historical and cultural features. Its black waters, cypress swamps and tidal marshes are home to many rare species of plants and animals. The river is also steeped in history with Native American settlements, Civil War sites, rice and indigo plantations, which highlight the Gullah-Geechee culture, as well as many historic homes, churches, shops, and remnants of industries that were once served by steamships. To protect this important natural resource, American Rivers, Waccamaw RIVERKEEPER®, and many local partners worked together to establish the Waccamaw River Blue Trail, providing greater access to the river and its recreation opportunities. A Blue Trail is a river adopted by a local community that is dedicated to improving family-friendly recreation such as fishing, boating, and wildlife watching and to conserving riverside land and water resources. Just as hiking trails are designed to help people explore the land, Blue Trails help people discover their rivers. They help communities improve recreation and tourism, benefit local businesses and the economy, and protect river health for the benefit of people, wildlife, and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 20: Further Notes on Species from the Eastern North America
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 15: 105-131. 2016. *pdf effectively published online 15November2016 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Studies in Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi – No. 20: Further notes on species from the eastern North America JAMES C. LENDEMER1 AND RICHARD C. HARRIS2 ABSTRACT. – Arthothelium lichenale is placed in synonymy with Mycoporum compositum. The morphological distinctions between Collema pustulatum and Leptogium apalachense are discussed and the North American distributions of the species are revised. The distribution of Lecidea roseotincta in North America is extended to include the central and southern Appalachian Mountains. The distribution of Lecidella subviridis is expanded in northeastern North America. Pyrenula reebiae is placed in synonymy with P. leucostoma and both species are illustrated and discussed. Pyrenula shirabeicola is removed from synonymy with P. pseudobufonia and both species are illustrated and discussed. The following taxa are newly reported from North America: Calvitimela cuprea (Canada, Newfoundland & Labrador), Hypotrachyna consimilis (U.S.A., North Carolina), Schismatomma graphidioides (U.S.A., Alabama and New Jersey). KEYWORDS. – Biogeography, Collemataceae, North American Checklist, Lecanoraceae, Lecideaceae, Parmeliaceae, Pyrenulaceae, sterile crust. INTRODUCTION As a result of fieldwork carried out throughout eastern North America, particularly in the southern Appalachian Mountains, we have studied new collections that prompted us to reexamine our understanding of recognized species, their distributions, and ecologies. Routine curation of the herbarium at the New York Botanical Garden led to similar studies, as has the identification of specimens that were newly donated to the herbarium. While such studies typically result in discrete taxonomic or floristic publications, there are often also brief notes that merit publication but are not easily accommodated in a standalone contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • NCWF Partnering for Red Wolves
    North Carolina WILDLIFE FE DERATIONJJournalournalWILD LIVES WILD PLACES Spring 20 18 WORK THE PLAN North Carolina’s Wildlife Action Plan Leaves No Species Behind. Bird’s-eye View Conservation Awards Nominations NCWF in the East 7 8 10 pathways in conservation You Say “Cheater” Like That’s a Bad T hing BY TIM GESTWICKI , NCWF CEO hether they fly, swim, burrow, hop, slither, scamper, or climb, wild animals are simply fascinating to me. Most Wof us have our favorites. I certainly do, but ask me to name my favorite wild creature and the answer I give you today might not be the one I would have given you a month ago. I’m a fickle wildlife lover. These days, I’m just getting over a pretty serious spring fling with wild turkeys. I’ve got a serious crush on lightning bugs going, but I know that it won’t last any longer than a summer vacation beach love because I’m a sucker for speckled trout come fall. I’ll be honest: When it comes to monogamy in wildlife love, count me out. I’m a serial cheater. I’ll dump a wood - pecker in a skinny minute when I hear a barred owl sing at sunset. Except for one wild thing—the loon. This is an ancient species, a large, heavy water bird that looks like a large duck but its belly floats below the water making it look a bit like a cormorant when swimming. Its summer plumage is black with beautiful white breast stripes and a white checkered back.
    [Show full text]
  • NC Conference of the UMC - Listing of Appointments
    NC Conference of The UMC - Listing of Appointments Current appointment listing as of 07/01/2019. Key to Appointment List Code Description Code Description Retired Member Other Conference AF Affiliate Member OR (Elder) - Retired Other Elder (Other) - Retired Member of Other Denomination AM Associate Member PD Provisional Deacon DC Deaconess PE Provisional Elder Part-time Local Pastor DM Diaconal Minister PL (SP) - Student Pastor of NC Conference (SP Other) - Student Pastor of Other Conference DR Retired Diaconal Minister PL/D Part-time Local Pastor/Deacon FD Deacon in Full Connection RA Retired Associate Member FE Elder in Full Connection RD Retired Deacon in Full Connection FL Full-Time Local Pastor RE Retired Elder LM Certified Lay Minister RL Retired Local Pastor OA Associate Member of Other Conference Deacon Member of Other Conference or Methodist OD RL/D Retired Local Pastor/Deacon Denomination Elder Member of Other Conference or Methodist Retired Provisional Member OE RP Denomination (Deacon) - Retired Provisional Deacon OF Other Non-Methodist Denomination SY Supplied/Hired/Assigned PM Serving Other Conference OP (Elder) - Other Provisional Elder (Deacon) - Other Provisional Deacon [2] Indicates number of churches on the charge. Page 1 Beacon District Gilliam P. Wise, District Superintendent [email protected] 64 Charges Conference Church Name Pastor Name Status Position Start Date Ahoskie UMC (Ahoskie) Jason Robert Villegas PE Pastor 07/01/2019 Albemarle Charge [3] Hebron UMC (Roper) Sue Barnes Farlow PL Pastor 01/01/2015 Mackeys UMC (Roper) Sue Barnes Farlow PL Pastor 01/01/2015 Pleasant Grove UMC (Roper) Sue Barnes Farlow PL Pastor 01/01/2015 All God's Children Mission Congregation Laura G.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumberton Recovery Plan
    2018 LUMBERTON RECOVERY PLAN LUMBERTON RECOVERY PLAN October 2018 Prepared by: Hurricane Matthew Disaster Recovery and Resilience Initiative Coastal Resilience Center The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lumberton, North Carolina Hurricane Matthew Recovery Plan October 2018 Prepared by: The Hurricane Matthew Disaster Recovery and Resilience Initiative, a collaborative program involving the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University. Funding provided by the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Policy Collaboratory. LUMBERTON, NORTH CAROLINA RECOVERY PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to the following agencies and individuals who contributed their time and expertise to the development of this recovery plan: • Wayne Horne City Manager • Brandon Love Director of Planning and Neighborhood Services • Holt Moore City Attorney • Tim Taylor Director of Recreation • Robert P. Armstrong Public Works Director • Teresa Johnson Community Development Administrator • Linda Maynor-Oxendine Public Services Director • Michael McNeill Chief of Police • Paul Ivey Fire Chief • Bill French Director of Emergency Services • Alisha Thompson Director of Finance • Connie Russ Downtown Coordinator • Mary Schultz Executive Director, Shining Stars Preschool • Mattie Caulder Assistant Director, Robeson County Emergency Management • Stephanie Chavis Executive Director, Robeson County Emergency Management • Channing Jones Director, Robeson County Economic
    [Show full text]
  • NC Conservation Network Annual Report
    Environmental Resource Program Pew Charitable Trusts Counter Culture Coffee Meredith Emmett and Galia William Nottingham 2013 Farmer Foodshare Physicians for Social Responsibility, Farm To Feet Goodman Katie Oates and Dan Murrey ORGANIZATIONAL Food & Water Watch Western NC Chapter Foothill Guide Service Bill Eubanks Richard Partridge Foothills Conservancy of North Piedmont Environmental Alliance Great Outdoor Provision Co. Ben Feldman Alice Patterson AFFILIATES Carolina Piedmont Land Conservancy Green Assets Elizabeth Anne Felty David and Cary Paynter Albemarle Environmental Friends of Forsyth POWER Action Group Green Planet Catering Karl B. and Debbie Leiner Fields Sam and Linda Pearsall Association Friends of Pocosin Lakes National River Guardian Foundation Grier Furr & Crisp, PA Barbara Fitzgerald Vickie Penninger American Rivers Wildlife Refuge Roanoke River Partners Larry’s Coffee Beans Ted and Joanne Frazer Susan Pizzo Appalachian Voices Friends of State Parks Rocky River Heritage Foundation Mack and Mack Jory Froggatt Scot Quaranda Audubon North Carolina Friends of the Deep River Sandhills Area Land Trust Merge Records Lena Gallitano Peter Raabe Bald Head Island Conservancy Greenpeace North Carolina Save Our Sandhills Nantahala Outdoor Center Rick and Bronwyn Gaskins Matt and Danya Raker Kathryn Gavaghan and Scott Bryna Rapp Black Family Land Trust Haw River Assembly Scotland County Of Tomorrow Nature’s Way Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust Southern Alliance for Clean Energy NC GreenPower Sanner Ulla-Britt Reeves Blue Ridge Conservancy
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus County NORTH CAROLINA
    Ô Columbus County NORTH CAROLINA VISITOR and RELOCATION GUIDE thecolumbuschamber.com #keepitcolumbus #KeepItColumbus | 1 The Lumber River Visitors Center, opened January 3, 2011 as a place where locals as well as visitors can get information Lumber River about Fair Bluff and the Lumber River. Information and brochures are found in the Visitors Center telling about great places to Welcome Visitors Center visit in Fair Bluff, like our River Walk and our Depot Museum. Established through a grant from the N.C. Tobacco Trust Commission, operated under the Guidelines of the N.C. Department of ETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT OF HE OLUMBUS Transportation, aided by the Town of Fair L T C Bluff and the Greater Fair Bluff Chamber CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND TOURISM. of Commerce, the Visitors Center is located at 1140 Main Street, right in the middle of town. Two main Highways pass by the Center making up Fair Bluff's Main Street, N.C. 904 and US Hwy 76. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN COLUMBUS COUNTY, NC. The Visitors Center is set up for meetings Whether you are planning to visit relocate and special events. Tours of the River Walk are featured and history of the City and the here or just pass through you will find that Lumber River. our county and towns are unique, quaint, and Please stop and visit us as you come through welcoming communities. Our small-town our beautiful town at 1140 Main St., Fair Bluff, N.C. Call us at 910-649-7202, or atmosphere is ideal for raising a family or set- email us at [email protected] .
    [Show full text]