DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Available Techniques Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-Alkali

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Available Techniques Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-Alkali Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) Thomas Brinkmann, Germán Giner Santonja, Frauke Schorcht, Serge Roudier, Luis Delgado Sancho 201 4 Report EUR 26844 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Contact information European IPPC Bureau Address: Joint Research Centre, Edificio Expo c/ Inca Garcilaso 3, E-41092 Seville, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +34 95 4488 284 Fax: +34 95 4488 426 http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/institutes/ipts Legal Notice Under the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the Re-use of Commission Documents (2011/833/EU), the present BREF document is subject to free re-use, except for parts covered by any third-party rights which may be present in the document (such as images, tables, data, written material, or similar, the rights to which need to be acquired separately from their respective rights-holders for further use). The European Commission is not liable for any consequence stemming from the re-use of this publication. Any re-use is subject to the acknowledgement of the source and non-distortion of the original meaning or message All images © European Union 2014, except: Cover pictures credits, from left to right: 1. Mercury: © fotolia.com - marcel; 2. Salt crystals: © fotolia.com - angelo.gi; 3. Water splash: © fotolia.com - Chepko Danil; 4. Chlorine: © Benjah-bmm27 – commons.wikimedia.org; 6. High voltage: © fotolia.com - carloscastilla. JRC91156 EUR 26844 EN ISBN 978-92-79-40945-5 (PDF) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) doi:10.2791/13138 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Abstract The BAT reference document entitled ‘Production of Chlor-alkali’ forms part of a series presenting the results of an exchange of information between EU Member States, the industries concerned, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, and the Commission, to draw up, review and, where necessary, update BAT reference documents as required by Article 13(1) of the Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions. This document is published by the European Commission pursuant to Article 13(6) of the Directive. This BREF for the production of chlor-alkali covers certain industrial activities specified in Sections 4.2(a) and 4.2(c) of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU, namely the production of chlor-alkali chemicals (chlorine, hydrogen, potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide) by the electrolysis of brine. In particular, this document covers the following processes and activities: - the storage of salt; - the preparation, purification and resaturation of brine; - the electrolysis of brine; - the concentration, purification, storage and handling of sodium/potassium hydroxide; - the cooling, drying, purification, compression, liquefaction, storage and handling of chlorine; - the cooling, purification, compression, storage and handling of hydrogen; - the conversion of mercury cell plants to membrane cell plants; - the decommissioning of mercury cell plants; - the remediation of chlor-alkali production sites. Important issues for the implementation of Directive 2010/75/EU in the chlor-alkali industry are the conversion and decommissioning of mercury cell plants, the conversion of asbestos diaphragm cell plants and the use of non-asbestos diaphragms, electricity consumption, and emissions of chlorine to air and water. The BREF contains seven chapters. Chapters 1 and 2 provide general information on the chlor-alkali industry and on the industrial processes and techniques used within this sector. Chapter 3 provides data and information concerning the environmental performance of installations in terms of current emissions, consumption of raw materials, water and energy, and generation of waste. Chapter 4 describes the techniques to prevent or reduce the environmental impact of installations in the sector. In Chapter 5 the BAT conclusions, as defined in Article 3(12) of the Directive, are presented for the chlor-alkali industry. Chapters 6 and 7 are dedicated to emerging techniques as well as to concluding remarks and recommendations for future work in the sector, respectively. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Chlor-alkali Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU Integrated Pollution Prevention and control Authors: Thomas Brinkmann Germán Giner Santonja Frauke Schorcht Serge Roudier Luis Delgado Sancho 2014 EUR 26844 EN Acknowledgements This report was produced by the European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (EIPPCB) at the European Commission's Joint Research Centre – Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) under the supervision of Serge Roudier (Head of the EIPPCB) and Luis Delgado Sancho (Head of the Sustainable Production and Consumption Unit). The authors of this BREF were Mr Thomas Brinkmann, Mr Germán Giner Santonja, and Ms Frauke Schorcht. This project report was drawn up in the framework of the implementation of the Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU) and is the result of the exchange of information provided for in Article 13 of the Directive. Major contributors of information were Euro Chlor, the European association of chlorine producers, the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) representing the environmental NGOs, and some EU Member States, mostly Austria, France, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom, but also Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The whole EIPPCB team provided contributions and peer reviewing. This document is one from the series of foreseen documents listed below (at the time of writing, not all documents have been drafted): Reference Document on Best Available Techniques Code Ceramic Manufacturing Industry CER Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical CWW Sector Emissions from Storage EFS Energy Efficiency ENE Ferrous Metals Processing Industry FMP Food, Drink and Milk Industries FDM Industrial Cooling Systems ICS Intensive Rearing of Poultry and Pigs IRPP Iron and Steel Production IS Large Combustion Plants LCP Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers LVIC-AAF Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Solids and Others Industry LVIC-S Large Volume Organic Chemical Industry LVOC Management of Tailings and Waste-rock in Mining Activities MTWR Manufacture of Glass GLS Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals OFC Non-ferrous Metals Industries NFM Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide CLM Production of Chlor-alkali CAK Production of Polymers POL Production of Pulp, Paper and Board PP Production of Speciality Inorganic Chemicals SIC Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas REF Slaughterhouses and Animals By-products Industries SA Smitheries and Foundries Industry SF Surface Treatment of Metals and Plastics STM Surface Treatment Using Organic Solvents STS Tanning of Hides and Skins TAN Textiles Industry TXT Waste Incineration WI Waste Treatments Industries WT Wood and Wood Products Preservation with Chemicals WPC Wood-based Panels Production WBP Reference Document Economics and Cross-media Effects ECM General Principles of Monitoring MON Electronic versions of draft and finalised documents are publicly available and can be downloaded from http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu. Preface PREFACE 1. Status of this document Unless otherwise stated, references to 'the Directive' in this document refer to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and the Council on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (Recast). The original best available techniques (BAT) reference document (BREF) on Production of Chlor-alkali was adopted by the European Commission in 2001. This document is the result of a review of that BREF. The review commenced in March 2009. This BAT reference document for the Production of Chlor-alkali forms part of a series presenting the results of an exchange of information between EU Member States, the industries concerned, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection and the Commission, to draw up, review, and where necessary, update BAT reference documents as required by Article 13(1) of the Directive. This document is published by the European Commission pursuant to Article 13(6) of the Directive. As set out in Article 13(5) of the Directive, the Commission Implementing Decision 2013/732/EU on the BAT conclusions contained in Chapter 5 was adopted on 9 December 2013 and published on 11 December 20131. 2. Participants in the information exchange As required in Article 13(3) of the Directive, the Commission has established a forum to promote the exchange of information, which is composed of representatives from Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection (Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of the Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (2011/C 146/03), OJ C 146, 17.05.2011, p. 3). Forum members have nominated technical experts constituting the technical working group (TWG) that was the main source of information for drafting this document. The work of the TWG was led by the European IPPC Bureau (of the Commission's Joint Research Centre). 3. Structure and contents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the Chlor-Alkali Industry
    2 History of the Chlor-Alkali Industry During the last half of the 19th century, chlorine, used almost exclusively in the textile and paper industry, was made [1] by reacting manganese dioxide with hydrochloric acid 100–110◦C MnO2 + 4HCl −−−−−−→ MnCl2 + Cl2 + 2H2O (1) Recycling of manganese improved the overall process economics, and the process became known as the Weldon process [2]. In the 1860s, the Deacon process, which generated chlorine by direct catalytic oxidation of hydrochloric acid with air according to Eq. (2) was developed [3]. ◦ 450–460 C;CuCl2 cat. 4HCl + O2(air) −−−−−−−−−−−−−−→ 2Cl2 + 2H2O(2) The HCl required for reactions (1) and (2) was available from the manufacture of soda ash by the LeBlanc process [4,5]. H2SO4 + 2NaCl → Na2SO4 + 2HCl (3) Na2SO4 + CaCO3 + 2C → Na2CO3 + CaS + 2CO2 (4) Utilization of HCl from reaction (3) eliminated the major water and air pollution problems of the LeBlanc process and allowed the generation of chlorine. By 1900, the Weldon and Deacon processes generated enough chlorine for the production of about 150,000 tons per year of bleaching powder in England alone [6]. An important discovery during this period was the fact that steel is immune to attack by dry chlorine [7]. This permitted the first commercial production and distribu- tion of dry liquid chlorine by Badische Anilin-und-Soda Fabrik (BASF) of Germany in 1888 [8,9]. This technology, using H2SO4 for drying followed by compression of the gas and condensation by cooling, is much the same as is currently practiced. 17 “chap02” — 2005/5/2 — 09Brie:49 — page 17 — #1 18 CHAPTER 2 In the latter part of the 19th century, the Solvay process for caustic soda began to replace the LeBlanc process.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing Industry December 2001
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing industry December 2001 Executive summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This reference document on best available techniques in the chlor-alkali industry reflects an information exchange carried out according to Article 16(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC. The document has to be seen in the light of the preface which describes the objectives of the document and its use. The chlor-alkali industry The chlor-alkali industry is the industry that produces chlorine (Cl2) and alkali, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH), by electrolysis of a salt solution. The main technologies applied for chlor-alkali production are mercury, diaphragm and membrane cell electrolysis, mainly using sodium chloride (NaCl) as feed or to a lesser extent using potassium chloride (KCl) for the production of potassium hydroxide. The diaphragm cell process (Griesheim cell, 1885) and the mercury cell process (Castner- Kellner cell, 1892) were both introduced in the late 1800s. The membrane cell process was developed much more recently (1970). Each of these processes represents a different method of keeping the chlorine produced at the anode separate from the caustic soda and hydrogen produced, directly or indirectly, at the cathode. Currently, 95% of world chlorine production is obtained by the chlor-alkali process. The geographic distribution of chlor-alkali processes world-wide differs appreciably (production capacity of chlorine): - western Europe, predominance of mercury cell process (June 2000): 55% - United States, predominance of diaphragm cell process: 75% - Japan, predominance of membrane cell process: >90% The remaining chlorine production capacity in western Europe consists of (June 2000) diaphragm cell process 22%, membrane cell process 20% and other processes 3%.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency
    Friday, December 19, 2003 Part II Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants; Final Rule VerDate jul<14>2003 15:14 Dec 18, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\19DER2.SGM 19DER2 70904 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2003 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION types of sources (usually in the Information or other information whose AGENCY elemental or inorganic forms) transports disclosure is restricted by statute. through the atmosphere and eventually The official public docket is the 40 CFR Part 63 deposits onto land or water bodies. collection of materials that is available [OAR–2002–0017; FRL–7551–5] When mercury is deposited to surface for public viewing. The EPA Docket waters, natural processes (bacterial) can RIN 2060–AE85 Center Public Reading Room is open transform some of the mercury into from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday methylmercury that accumulates in fish. through Friday, excluding legal National Emission Standards for Ingestion is the primary exposure route Hazardous Air Pollutants: Mercury holidays. The telephone number for the of interest for methylmercury. The Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and Emissions From Mercury Cell Chlor- health effect of greatest concern due to Alkali Plants the telephone number for the Air Docket methylmercury is neurotoxicity, is (202) 566–1742. AGENCY: Environmental Protection particularly with respect to fetuses and Agency (EPA). young children. Electronic Docket Access. You may access the final rule electronically ACTION: Final rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Electrolysis Parameters for Green Sanitation Chemicals Production Using Response Surface Methodology
    processes Article Optimization of Electrolysis Parameters for Green Sanitation Chemicals Production Using Response Surface Methodology Nurul Izzah Khalid 1 , Nurul Shaqirah Sulaiman 1 , Norashikin Ab Aziz 1,2,* , Farah Saleena Taip 1, Shafreeza Sobri 3 and Nor-Khaizura Mahmud Ab Rashid 4 1 Department of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (N.I.K.); [email protected] (N.S.S.); [email protected] (F.S.T.) 2 Halal Products Research Institute, University Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43300, Selangor, Malaysia 3 Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] 4 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-9769-4302 Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020; Published: 6 July 2020 Abstract: Electrolyzed water (EW) shows great potential as a green and economical sanitation solution for the food industry. However, only limited studies have investigated the optimum electrolysis parameters and the bactericidal effect of acidic electrolyzed water (AcEW) and alkaline electrolyzed water (AlEW). Here, the Box–Behnken experimental design was used to identify the optimum parameters. The tests were conducted with different types of electrodes, electrical voltages, electrolysis times, and NaCl concentrations. There were no obvious differences observed in the physico-chemical properties of EW when different electrodes were used. However, stainless steel was chosen as it meets most of the selection criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Regenerative Fuel Cells? 1 of 8
    What Are Regenerative Fuel Cells? 1 of 8 altenergy.org What Are Regenerative Fuel Cells? Alan Davison 11-14 minutes Scientists, researchers, and engineers are on a quest for the holy grail of energy technologies, and a key component of any energy system is figuring out new and innovative ways to store energy. One of the most popular visions for a renewable energy future is the hydrogen economy, but the question as to where one gets the hydrogen required to sustain it is as old as the idea itself. The regenerative fuel cell might be the answer that hydrogen economists are looking for. What are regenerative fuel cells? Ever wonder what would happen if you could run a fuel cell in reverse? You get a reverse fuel cell (RFC) or regenerative fuel cell. If a fuel cell is a device that takes a chemical fuel and consumes it to produce electricity and a waste product, an RFC can be thought of as a device that takes that waste product and electricity to return the original chemical fuel. Indeed any fuel cell chemistry can be run in reverse, as is the nature of oxidation reduction reactions, but a fuel cell that isn't designed to do so may not be very efficient at running in reverse. In fact many fuel cells are designed to prevent the reverse reaction about:reader?url=https://www.altenergy.org/renewables/regenerative-fuel-cells.html What Are Regenerative Fuel Cells? 2 of 8 from occurring at all, for why would you want to consume the energy you just produced? Instead you might design a separate cell for the express purpose of taking energy generated from another source and storing it as a fuel for conversion back into energy when you need it via fuel cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrolysis in Ironmaking
    Fact sheet Electrolysis in ironmaking The transition to a low-carbon world requires a transformation in the way we manufacture iron and steel. There is no single solution to CO2-free steelmaking, and a broad portfolio of technological options is required, to be deployed alone, or in combination as local circumstances permit. This series of fact sheets describes and explores the status of a number of key technologies. What is electrolysis? Why consider electrolysis in ironmaking? Electrolysis is a technique that uses direct electric current to There are two potential ways to separate metallic iron from separate some chemical compounds into their constituent the oxygen to which it is bonded in iron ore. These are parts. through the use of chemical reductants such as hydrogen or carbon, or through the use of electro-chemical processes Electricity is applied to an anode and a cathode, which are that use electrical energy to reduce iron ore. immersed in the chemical to be electrolysed. In electrolysis, iron ore is dissolved in a solvent of silicon Electrolysis of water (H2O) produces hydrogen and oxygen, dioxide and calcium oxide at 1,600°C, and an electric current whereas electrolysis of aluminium oxide (Al2O3) produces passed through it. Negatively-charged oxygen ions migrate metallic aluminium and oxygen. to the positively charged anode, and the oxygen bubbles off. Positively-charged iron ions migrate to the negatively- charged cathode where they are reduced to elemental iron. If the electricity used is carbon-free, then iron is produced without emissions of CO2. Electrolysis of iron ore has been demonstrated at the laboratory scale, producing metallic iron and oxygen as a co-product.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufact
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Chlor-Alkali Manufacturing Industry December 2001 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This reference document on best available techniques in the chlor-alkali industry reflects an information exchange carried out according to Article 16(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC. The document has to be seen in the light of the preface which describes the objectives of the document and its use. The chlor-alkali industry The chlor-alkali industry is the industry that produces chlorine (Cl2) and alkali, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH), by electrolysis of a salt solution. The main technologies applied for chlor-alkali production are mercury, diaphragm and membrane cell electrolysis, mainly using sodium chloride (NaCl) as feed or to a lesser extent using potassium chloride (KCl) for the production of potassium hydroxide. The diaphragm cell process (Griesheim cell, 1885) and the mercury cell process (Castner- Kellner cell, 1892) were both introduced in the late 1800s. The membrane cell process was developed much more recently (1970). Each of these processes represents a different method of keeping the chlorine produced at the anode separate from the caustic soda and hydrogen produced, directly or indirectly, at the cathode. Currently, 95% of world chlorine production is obtained by the chlor-alkali process. The geographic distribution of chlor-alkali processes world-wide differs appreciably (production capacity of chlorine): - western Europe, predominance of mercury cell process (June 2000): 55% - United States, predominance of diaphragm cell process: 75% - Japan, predominance of membrane cell process: >90% The remaining chlorine production capacity in western Europe consists of (June 2000) diaphragm cell process 22%, membrane cell process 20% and other processes 3%.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar-Driven, Highly Sustained Splitting of Seawater Into Hydrogen and Oxygen Fuels
    Solar-driven, highly sustained splitting of seawater into hydrogen and oxygen fuels Yun Kuanga,b,c,1, Michael J. Kenneya,1, Yongtao Menga,d,1, Wei-Hsuan Hunga,e, Yijin Liuf, Jianan Erick Huanga, Rohit Prasannag, Pengsong Lib,c, Yaping Lib,c, Lei Wangh,i, Meng-Chang Lind, Michael D. McGeheeg,j, Xiaoming Sunb,c,d,2, and Hongjie Daia,2 aDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; bState Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; cBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; dCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China; eDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan; fStanford Synchrotron Radiation Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025; gDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; hCenter for Electron Microscopy, Institute for New Energy Materials, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China; iTianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Porous Materials, School of Materials, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China; and jDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309 Contributed by Hongjie Dai, February 5, 2019 (sent for review January 14, 2019; reviewed by Xinliang Feng and Ali Javey) Electrolysis of water to generate hydrogen fuel is an attractive potential ∼490 mV higher than that of OER, which demands renewable energy storage technology. However, grid-scale fresh- highly active OER electrocatalysts capable of high-current (∼1 2 water electrolysis would put a heavy strain on vital water re- A/cm ) operations for high-rate H2/O2 production at over- sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cell Performance and Degradation
    REVERSIBLE FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE AND DEGRADATION by Matthew Aaron Cornachione A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April, 2011 c Copyright by Matthew Aaron Cornachione 2011 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Matthew Aaron Cornachione This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibli- ographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the The Graduate School. Dr. Steven R. Shaw Approved for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Dr. Robert C. Maher Approved for the The Graduate School Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfullment of the requirements for a master's degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with \fair use" as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Matthew Aaron Cornachione April, 2011 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Steven Shaw, for granting me the oppor- tunity to work at Montana State University as a graduate research assistant and for providing assistance to many aspects of this work from circuit design to machining parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Fact Sheet
    National Mercury Testing Program The Rise of Mercury Pollution its way into our lakes and rivers. Once in the water, toxic mercury is absorbed through the fat and muscle tissue of There is growing concern and scientific evidence that many animals like fish. Americans are being exposed to harmful levels of mercury pollution. However, the Bush administration is failing to Most people are exposed to mercury by consuming the polluted protect Americans from this dangerous toxin. Instead, the fish. As a result, federal and state governments warn people to administration has proposed to delay for 10 to 20 years and limit the consumption of certain species of fish and fish caught weaken the first national law that would clean up mercury from in waters that are contaminated with mercury. power plants, the single largest source of mercury in the country. This is in stark contrast from what was originally People that work in industries that regularly handle mercury proposed and what is achievable now, even by the (dentistry, thermometer production) or deal with high level of Environmental Protection Agencys own previous analysis: a mercury emissions (electricity generation primarily through coal, chlorine production through chlor-akali facilities, 90 percent reduction in mercury pollution by 2008. insecticides, etc.) are also at an increased risk for exposure to mercury pollution. What is Mercury and Who is Affected by Mercury Pollution? The Food and Drug Administration is charged with the protection of the public from mercury in store-bought fish. Mercury is a neurotoxin that is most often seen as a by-product Unfortunately their recommendations are vague and provide from industrial processes like power plants, incinerators and insufficient information to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco Profile on Chlorine
    An Eco-profile and Environmental Product Declaration of the European Chlor-Alkali Industry Chlorine (The chlor-alkali process) Euro Chlor September 2013 - Synthesis 1 Introduction Allocation method Stoichiometric allocation for Salt, mass allocation for all other input This Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is and emissions. Sensitivity analysis based upon life cycle inventory (LCI) data from for other allocation methods was performed. Euro Chlor’s member companies. It has been prepared according to the rules of Description of the Product and the PlasticsEurope’s LCI Methodology “Eco-profiles Production Process and Environmental Declarations” (version 2.0, This Eco-profile and EPD represents the European April 2011). EPDs provide environmental average industrial production of chlorine, sodium performance data, but no information on the hydroxide, hydrogen, and sodium hypochlorite by economic and social aspects, which would be chlor-alkali electrolysis from cradle to gate. necessary for a complete sustainability assessment. Further, they do not imply a value Production Process judgment between environmental criteria. Salt (NaCl) recovered from various sources (rock This EPD describes the production of chlorine by salt, solar salt, solution-mined brine, vacuum chlor-alkali electrolysis from cradle to gate (from salt) is dissolved in water and the resulting brine production of salt/brine to liquid chlorine, is purified and fed to the electrolysis unit where sodium hydroxide, and hypochlorite at plant). the brine is electrochemically decomposed into Please keep in mind that comparisons cannot chlorine, hydrogen, and sodium hydroxide. Three be made on the level of the chemicals alone: it different electrolysis techniques are applied: is necessary to consider the full life cycle of an mercury, diaphragm, and membrane cell application in order to compare the performance technology.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-The-Art Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Water Electrolysis
    NREL/BK-6A1-46676 September 2009 Current (2009) State-of-the-Art Hydrogen Production Cost Estimate Using Water Electrolysis Independent Review Published for the U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard • Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S.
    [Show full text]