DOCSLIB.ORG

CAGED IN: Solitary Confinement's Devastating Harm on Prisoners With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CAGED IN: Solitary Confinement's Devastating Harm on Prisoners With SOLITARY CONFINEMENT’S DEVASTATING HARM ON PRISONERS CAGED IN WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES January 2017 CAGED IN At America’s Expense: SOLITARYThe Mass Incarceration CONFINEMENT’S of the Elderly DEVASTATING HARM ON PRISONERS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES ©June 2017 2012 ACLU Foundation American Civil Liberties Union 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 www.aclu.org Cover image credit: Tim Gruber Written by: Jamelia Morgan Cover image: Andrew Lichtenstein CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................... 4 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................10 A. Why We Must Act Now.............................................................................................................................13 1. Disabilities Are Common in Prisons and Jails.......................................................................................13 2. Heightened Vulnerabilities..................................................................................................................13 B. Why It Can Get Worse..............................................................................................................................14 1. Crowded Prisons ................................................................................................................................14 2. Aging Prisoners..................................................................................................................................15 C. Scope of the Report and Definitions..........................................................................................................16 D. Methodology...........................................................................................................................................17 E. A Note on Language................................................................................................................................18 II. SPOTLIGHT ON TARGET JURISDICTIONS...............................................................................................................19 A. Population Data......................................................................................................................................20 B. Limited Data on Complaints Filed by Prisoners With Physical Disabilities..................................................21 III. SOLITARY CONFINEMENT HARMS PRISONERS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES............................................................. 24 A. Psychological Harm.................................................................................................................................24 B. Physical Harms.......................................................................................................................................26 1. Architectural Barriers in Facilities.......................................................................................................28 2. Self-Care............................................................................................................................................29 3. Disrupted Medical Therapies...............................................................................................................30 4. Limited to No Physical Activity.............................................................................................................30 5. Physical Therapy.................................................................................................................................31 C. Rehabilitative Harms...............................................................................................................................32 D. Solitary Confinement Inflicts Acute Harms on Prisoners With Sensory Disabilities.....................................32 1. Deaf and Hard of Hearing Prisoners.....................................................................................................32 2. Blind and Low Vision Prisoners...........................................................................................................35 3. Communication Barriers.....................................................................................................................35 IV. FAILURES TO PROVIDE ACCOMMODATIONS AND ASSISTIVE DEVICES......................................................................... 37 V. HOW PRISONERS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES END UP IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT................................................... 40 A. What We Know About Prisoners With Physical Disabilities in Solitary Confinement.....................................40 B. How Do Prisoners With Physical Disabilities End Up in Solitary Confinement?............................................41 1. Administrative Segregation.................................................................................................................41 2. Protective Custody..............................................................................................................................41 3. Medical Isolation.................................................................................................................................42 4. Disciplinary or Punitive Segregation....................................................................................................42 5. Placements Into Solitary Confinement Due to Lack of Accessible Housing.............................................45 6. Trapped in Solitary..............................................................................................................................46 VI. LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR PRISONERS WITH DISABILITIES IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT................................................ 47 A. International Law....................................................................................................................................47 1. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.....................................................................47 2. Nelson Mandela Rules........................................................................................................................47 B. Constitutional Protections: The Eighth Amendment..................................................................................48 C. The Americans with Disabilities Act..........................................................................................................49 1. Reasonable Accommodations..............................................................................................................49 2. Effective Communications...................................................................................................................50 3. Limits to the ADA................................................................................................................................50 D. Prison Litigation Reform Act....................................................................................................................51 E. Protection & Advocacy Monitoring and Oversight......................................................................................51 F. State Law................................................................................................................................................51 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENDING SOLITARY CONFINEMENT OF PRISONERS WITH DISABILITIES.................................... 52 A. Recommended Action..............................................................................................................................53 1. Correctional Systems..........................................................................................................................53 2. Federal...............................................................................................................................................54 3. State and Local...................................................................................................................................55 B. Model Policies and Procedures................................................................................................................55 1. General Principles..............................................................................................................................55 2. General Principles Regarding Incarcerated Persons With Physical Disabilities.......................................56 3. Process Prior to Placement.................................................................................................................56 4. Disciplinary Segregation.....................................................................................................................57 5. Protective Custody..............................................................................................................................57 6. Conditions..........................................................................................................................................57 VIII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................................................................................59 IX. APPENDICES..................................................................................................................................................60
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Missing Pieces Report: the 2018 Board Diversity Census of Women
    alliance for board diversity Missing Pieces Report: The 2018 Board Diversity Census of Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards Missing Pieces Report: The 2018 Board Diversity Census of Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards About the Alliance for Board Diversity Founded in 2004, the Alliance for Board Diversity (ABD) is a collaboration of four leadership organizations: Catalyst, The Executive Leadership Council (ELC), the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility (HACR), and LEAP (Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics). Diversified Search, an executive search firm, is a founding partner of the alliance and serves as an advisor and facilitator. The ABD’s mission is to increase the representation of women and minorities on corporate boards. More information about ABD is available at www.theabd.org. About Deloitte In the US, Deloitte LLP and Deloitte USA LLP are member firms of DTTL. The subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP provide industry- leading audit & assurance, consulting, tax, and risk and financial advisory services to many of the world’s most admired brands, including more than 85 percent of the Fortune 500 and more than 6,000 private and middle market companies. Our people work across more than 20 industry sectors with one purpose: to deliver measurable, lasting results. We help reinforce public trust in our capital markets, inspire clients to make their most challenging business decisions with confidence, and help lead the way toward a stronger economy and a healthy society. As part of the DTTL network of member firms, we are proud to be associated with the largest global professional services network, serving our clients in the markets that are most important to them.
    [Show full text]
  • 83550NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .-. --.-..--------- -- " , ~, -' . ~ 0'-;,0 , ..... ' . , '..;:- .' : " --r ,. .. ' . ;,.,..'. .,t' " ., ~ /1 '"fY) " --~~ '/ ' , ~ ., , r- . .;~ I ... ~",,--,.-.-'---' -...,...,----- '..,......., --"" -~- . ,-, ,:' ); "~ ,,,";~r .•. t:-- ' ":","-,,f,(., .), " ,~ /': ~~.,y'~" ~............ ----------------~.-~------------------------------------~----------~----------~ ----~-------------------- - -s-- !1 ) ~) ~ i ,';' ~ : 'THE CORRECTIOnS PROGRAr1 A "Corrections Program" within the Office of Vocational and Adult Education has been established by the Department of Education. The National Institute of Corrections has provided senior level staffing through a cooperative grant as their commitment to this new corrections initiative. A FOR CORRECTIONAL The overall goal of this joint effort is to increase the quality and quantity of ~ECTORY education and training opportunities for adult and juvenile offenders. In order to EDUCATION ADMINISTRATORS reach this goal, the Corrections Program wlll.;nitiate a variety of liaison, technical assistance and clearinghouse activities, includi'ng: 1. Coordinate existing ED funding programs which could benefit corrections. 2. Coordinate ED programs with those of other federal agencies such as the Departments of Labor, Justice, Health and Human Services, Housing and U.S. Department of Justice Urban Development, Veterans' Administratio~, and the Military Services. National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly
    [Show full text]
  • LOUISIANA on LOCKDOWN Groundbreaking New Report by Solitary Watch, ACLU of LA, and JSRI Exposes Impact of Solitary Confnement in Louisiana Prisons
    JESUIT SOCIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE QUARTERLY JustSouth SUMMER 2019 LOUISIANA ON LOCKDOWN Groundbreaking New Report by Solitary WatCh, ACLU of LA, and JSRI Exposes ImpaCt of Solitary Confnement in Louisiana Prisons BY SUE WEISHAR, PH.D. Across the United States, 80,000 to 100,000 incarcerated The Vera Institute for Justice found in 2016 that 17.4 percent people are locked in prison or jail cells without any of people in Louisiana prisons were in solitary—almost four meaningful human interaction for 22 to 24 hours a day times the national average.3 Over the past two years, JSRI for weeks, years, and even decades straight.1 Prolonged worked4 with Solitary Watch and the ACLU of Louisiana to social isolation can infict permanent psychological and produce a major report on the use of extreme isolation neurological damage and can literally cause people to in Louisiana. It was released June 25. The report is based lose their minds. Instead of being a “last resort” measure on surveys mailed to 2,902 people in solitary confnement used temporarily for safety reasons, often incarcerated in nine Louisiana prisons in 2017. A total of 709 persons persons are placed in solitary confnement for possessing completed the survey, making it one of the largest response contraband, testing positive for drugs, or using profanity. cohorts ever for a study on solitary confnement. The survey Although it has become common practice in U.S. asked several open-ended questions about prisoners’ correctional systems, the use of solitary confnement, experiences in solitary, which many responded to in rich also known as segregation or restricted housing, has detail—painting a harrowing picture of solitary confnement never been shown to reduce violence in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration
    Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science Volume 4 Article 3 5-10-2016 Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration Peter Hanna San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Hanna, Peter (2016) "Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration," Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science: Vol. 4 , Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31979/THEMIS.2016.0403 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol4/iss1/3 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Justice Studies at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science by an authorized editor of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration Abstract This paper examines the costs and impacts of prison overpopulation and mass incarceration on individuals, families, communities, and society as a whole. We start with an overview of the American prison system and the costs of maintaining it today, and move on to an account of the historical background of the prison system to provide context for the discussions later in this paper. This paper proceeds to go into more detail about the financial and social costs of mass incarceration, concluding that the costs of the prison system outweigh its benefits. This paper will then discuss the stigma and stereotypes associated with prison inmates that are formed and spread through mass media.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalk and Cheese: Australian Vs. Norwegian Prisons
    Chalk and Cheese Australian vs. Norwegian Prisons by Irina Dunn 1Published by Community Justice Coalition 2017 © Community Justice Coalition / Irina Dunn 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted by any person or entity, including internet such as engines or retailers, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying (except under the statutory exceptions provisions of the Australian Copyright Act 1968), recording, scanning or by any information storage and retrieval system without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. The fact that this book is published online does not mean that any part of it can be reproduced without frst obtaining written permission: copyright laws do still apply. Inquiries should be directed to the author. First published by Community Justice Coalition in 2017 PO Box 386 Broadway Sydney NSW 2007 Australia Phone (02) 9283 0123 www.communityjusticecoalition.org National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Creator: Irina Dunn, author Title: Chalk & Cheese: Australian vs. Norwegian Prisons ISBN: 9780648140405 (ebook) Subjects: Criminal justice, Administrator of --Australia Criminal justice, Administration of --Great Britain Criminal justice, Administration of --Norway Criminal justice, Administration of --Netherlands Criminal justice, Administration of --Cross-Cultural-Studies Cover designed by Nick Freeman Breakout Media Communications Edited by Irina Dunn 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Missing Pieces Report: the Board Diversity Census of Women And
    Missing Pieces Report: The Board Diversity Census of Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards, 6th edition Missing Pieces Report: The Board Diversity Census of Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards, 6th edition About the Alliance for Board Diversity Founded in 2004, the Alliance for Board Diversity (ABD) is a collaboration of four leadership organizations: Catalyst, the Executive Leadership Council (ELC), the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility (HACR), and Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics (LEAP). Diversified Search Group, an executive search firm, is a founding partner of the alliance and serves as an advisor and facilitator. The ABD’s mission is to enhance shareholder value in Fortune 500 companies by promoting inclusion of women and minorities on corporate boards. More information about ABD is available at theabd.org. About Deloitte Deloitte provides industry-leading audit, consulting, tax and advisory services to many of the world’s most admired brands, including nearly 90% of the Fortune 500® and more than 7,000 private companies. Our people come together for the greater good and work across the industry sectors that drive and shape today’s marketplace — delivering measurable and lasting results that help reinforce public trust in our capital markets, inspire clients to see challenges as opportunities to transform and thrive, and help lead the way toward a stronger economy and a healthier society. Deloitte is proud to be part of the largest global professional services network serving our clients in the markets that are most important to them. Now celebrating 175 years of service, our network of member firms spans more than 150 countries and territories.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Policy Reform in Colombia 9
    Table of Contents Executive Summary / 7 Introduction / 13 The publication of this report was supported by the Washington Prison from a Gender Perspective: Incarceration’s Effects on Women Convicted of Drug Crimes / 21 Office on Latin America and Open Society Foundations. Drug Policies and Gender: An Overdue Analysis / 22 ISBN 978-958-59496-9-0 Digital edition The Profile of Women Imprisoned for Drug Crimes in Colombia / 23 Colombia’s Prison Crisis and Its Impact on Women / 29 Photography Jessamine Bartley-Matthews Adam Schaffer Public Policy Recommendations: The Need for More Human and Effective Measures / 53 Understanding the Human Side of the Drug Problem / 54 Layout and cover Alejandro Ospina Changing Criminal Sanctions / 60 Understanding and Minimizing Prison’s Differentiated Translation Morgan Stoffregen and Disproportionate Effects on Women / 70 Printed by References / 77 Ediciones Antropos Ltda. First edition Bogotá, Colombia, October 2016 This document is available at http://www.dejusticia.org Women’s Voices from Prison: When Women Are Used as “Bait” for International Trafficking / 26 Marginal Links to Criminal Organizations / 27 When Criminal Defense Works against Defendants / 31 The Accused Cannot Reduce Their Sentences / 32 Creative Commons License 2.5 What Are Living Conditions Like in Prison? / 34 Attribution – Non-commercial – Share alike The Erosion and Weakening of Family Ties / 38 Long-Distance Mother-Child Relationships / 39 Dejusticia, 2016 Carrera 24 No. 34–61, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Life After Prison and the Possibility of Relapse 1 / 42 Telephone: (+57 1) 608 3605 Life After Prison and the Possibility of Relapse 2 / 45 www.dejusticia.org Executive Summary n recent decades, the dominant model for responding to the drug problem has been the “war on drugs,” which relies on penal law to criminalize, prohibit, and penalize conduct associated with all stages of the drug trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Solitary Troubles, Notre Dame Law Review Download
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 93 | Issue 3 Article 1 3-2018 Solitary Troubles Alexander A. Reinert Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. 927 (2018) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES SOLITARY TROUBLES Alexander A. Reinert* Solitary confinement is one of the most severe forms of punishment that can be inflicted on human beings. In recent years, the use of extreme isolation in our prisons and jails has been questioned by correctional officials, medical experts, and reform advocates alike. Yet for nearly the entirety of American history, judicial regulation of the practice has been extremely limited. This Article explains why judges hesitate to question the use of solitary confinement, while also providing a path forward for greater scrutiny of the practice. INTRODUCTION .................................................. 928 I. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE PRACTICE OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT ............................................ 937 II. LEGAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE USE OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT ............................................ 941 A. Solitary Confinement and Procedural Due Process .......... 941 B. Solitary Confinement and the Eighth Amendment .......... 944 1. Eighth Amendment Fundamentals ............... 944 2. Judicial Deference Across Eighth Amendment Doctrine ......................................... 946 3. Deference in Action.............................. 948 4. The Failure to Regulate Solitary Confinement Through the Eighth Amendment................. 950 III. A WAY FORWARD FOR JUDICIAL REGULATION OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Old Montana Prison a Self-Guided Tour Of
    A SELF-GUIDED TOUR OF OLD MONTANA PRISON 2 WELCOME Bands of outlaws and Vigilantes roamed early Montana Territory leaving a path of destruction and death. In an attempt to tame the Wild West, a prison was established in Deer Lodge in 1871. Constructed primarily with convict labor, Old Montana Prison was an active prison until 1979, when it was moved to a new site four miles west of town. The Old Montana Prison Is preserved and presented to you by Powell County Museum and Arts Foundation and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. • This tour will take 45 to 60 minutes to complete. • This site is over 130 years old and some of the grounds are uneven, so please watch your step. • Please stay on the tour route. • Do not mark or remove any property under penalty of law. You are standing next to the entrance just inside the prison yard. Turn right and follow the sidewalk along the Wall. Numbered markers will indicate the attraction that is described in this booklet. 3 1896 Cell House 1. Location of 1896 Cell House An enormous red brick cell house with rounded towers loomed over the city of Deer Lodge until 1959 when it was damaged by an earthquake and torn down. In 1960, this slab was poured as a foundation for a gymnasium and classroom buildings. Both buildings were moved to the new prison. The 1896 Cell House was divided into two sections by a two-foot thick wall, which ran from the roof to the floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Numbers 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on Numbers 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE The title the Jews used in their Hebrew Old Testament for this book comes from the fifth word in the book in the Hebrew text, bemidbar: "in the wilderness." This is, of course, appropriate since the Israelites spent most of the time covered in the narrative of Numbers in the wilderness. The English title "Numbers" is a translation of the Greek title Arithmoi. The Septuagint translators chose this title because of the two censuses of the Israelites that Moses recorded at the beginning (chs. 1—4) and toward the end (ch. 26) of the book. These "numberings" of the people took place at the beginning and end of the wilderness wanderings and frame the contents of Numbers. DATE AND WRITER Moses wrote Numbers (cf. Num. 1:1; 33:2; Matt. 8:4; 19:7; Luke 24:44; John 1:45; et al.). He apparently wrote it late in his life, across the Jordan from the Promised Land, on the Plains of Moab.1 Moses evidently died close to 1406 B.C., since the Exodus happened about 1446 B.C. (1 Kings 6:1), the Israelites were in the wilderness for 40 years (Num. 32:13), and he died shortly before they entered the Promised Land (Deut. 34:5). There are also a few passages that appear to have been added after Moses' time: 12:3; 21:14-15; and 32:34-42. However, it is impossible to say how much later. 1See the commentaries for fuller discussions of these subjects, e.g., Gordon J.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    PART ON E F IS FOR FORTUNE COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL CCH001.inddH001.indd 7 99/18/10/18/10 77:13:28:13:28 AAMM CCH001.inddH001.indd 8 99/18/10/18/10 77:13:28:13:28 AAMM LOST IN LOST ’ S TIMES Richard Davies Lost and Losties have a pretty bad reputation: they seem to get too much fun out of telling and talking about stories that everyone else fi nds just irritating. Even the Onion treats us like a bunch of fanatics. Is this fair? I want to argue that it isn ’ t. Even if there are serious problems with some of the plot devices that Lost makes use of, these needn ’ t spoil the enjoyment of anyone who fi nds the series fascinating. Losing the Plot After airing only a few episodes of the third season of Lost in late 2007, the Italian TV channel Rai Due canceled the show. Apparently, ratings were falling because viewers were having diffi culty following the plot. Rai Due eventually resumed broadcasting, but only after airing The Lost Survivor Guide , which recounts the key moments of the fi rst two seasons and gives a bit of background on the making of the series. Even though I was an enthusiastic Lostie from the start, I was grateful for the Guide , if only because it reassured me 9 CCH001.inddH001.indd 9 99/18/10/18/10 77:13:28:13:28 AAMM 10 RICHARD DAVIES that I wasn’ t the only one having trouble keeping track of who was who and who had done what.
    [Show full text]