Name Affiliation Title Abstract Eliana Amazo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Daniel Huber
Asteroseismology & Exoplanets: A Kepler Success Story Daniel Huber SETI Institute / NASA Ames Research Center U Chicago Astronomy Colloquium April 2014 Collaborators Bill Chaplin, Andrea Miglio, Yvonne Elsworth, Tiago Campante & Rasmus Handberg (Birmingham) Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Hans Kjeldsen, Victor Silva Aguirre (Aarhus) Tim Bedding & Dennis Stello (Sydney) Ron Gilliland (PSU), Sarbani Basu (Yale), Steve Kawaler (Iowa State), Travis Metcalfe (SSI), Jaymie Matthews (UBC), Saskia Hekker (Amsterdam), Marc Pinsonneault & Jennifer Johnson (OSU), Eric Gaidos (Hawaii) Tom Barclay, Jason Rowe, Elisa Quintana & Jack Lissauer (NASA Ames / SETI) Josh Carter, Lars Buchhave, Dave Latham, Ben Montet & John Johnson (Harvard) Dan Fabrycky (Chicago) Josh Winn, Kat Deck & Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda (MIT) Andrew Howard, Howard Isaacson & Geoff Marcy (Hawaii, Berkeley) The Kepler Space Telescope • launched in March 2009 • 0.95 m aperture • 42 CCD’s , 105 sq deg FOV Borucki et al. (2008), Koch et al. (2010) Kepler Field of View Kepler Orbit Kepler obtained uninterrupted high-precision photometry of ~> 150,000 stars for 4 years to search for transiting exoplanets Asteroseismology in a Nutshell AstEroseismology? AstEroseismology? unnamed author, sometime in 1995 What causes stellar oscillations? Oscillations in cool stars are driven by turbulent surface convection (opacity in hot stars) Radial Order n displacement center surface number of nodes from the surface to the center of the star Spherical Degree l l = 0 Spherical Degree l l = 2 l = 0 Δν ~ 135 µHz for the Sun sound speed cs -1 3 1/2 Δν = (2 ∫dr/cs) ∝ (M/R ) (ω = n π c / L!) Ulrich (1986) δν ∝ ∫dcs/dr (Age) δν (individual frequencies) sound speed cs -1 3 1/2 Δν = (2 ∫dr/cs) ∝ (M/R ) (ω = n π c / L!) Ulrich (1986) νmax νmax ~ 3000 µHz for the Sun 0.5 -2 0.5 νmax ∝ νac ∝ g Teff ∝ M R Teff Brown et al. -
The Tierras Observatory: an Ultra-Precise Photometer to Characterize Nearby Terrestrial Exoplanets
The Tierras Observatory: An ultra-precise photometer to characterize nearby terrestrial exoplanets Juliana Garc´ıa-Mej´ıaa, David Charbonneaua, Daniel Fabricanta, Jonathan M. Irwina, Robert Fataa, Joseph M. Zajaca, and Peter E. Dohertya aCenter for Astrophysics Harvard and Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge MA j ABSTRACT We report on the status of the Tierras Observatory, a refurbished 1.3-m ultra-precise fully-automated photometer located at the F. L. Whipple Observatory atop Mt. Hopkins, Arizona. Tierras is designed to limit systematic errors, notably precipitable water vapor (PWV), to 250 ppm, enabling the characterization of terrestrial planet transits orbiting < 0:3 R stars, as well as the potential discovery of exo-moons and exo-rings. The design choices that will enable our science goals include: a four-lens focal reducer and field-flattener to increase the field-of-view of the telescope from a 11:940 to a 0:48◦ side; a custom narrow bandpass (40:2 nm FWHM) filter centered around 863:5 nm to minimize PWV errors known to limit ground-based photometry of red dwarfs; and a deep-depletion 4K 4K CCD with a 300ke- full well and QE> 85% in our bandpass, operating in frame transfer mode. We are also× pursuing the design of a set of baffles to minimize the significant amount of scattered light reaching the image plane. Tierras will begin science operations in early 2021. Keywords: ultra-precise photometry, terrestrial planet detection, exoplanet instrumentation, transit method 1. INTRODUCTION The construction of observatories tailor-built to routinely achieve precise photometry from the ground is mo- tivated by the multitude of exoplanetary and stellar phenomena whose exploration will be enabled with high- cadence, ultra-precise time series of diverse stellar targets. -
FIXED STARS a SOLAR WRITER REPORT for Churchill Winston WRITTEN by DIANA K ROSENBERG Page 2
FIXED STARS A SOLAR WRITER REPORT for Churchill Winston WRITTEN BY DIANA K ROSENBERG Page 2 Prepared by Cafe Astrology cafeastrology.com Page 23 Churchill Winston Natal Chart Nov 30 1874 1:30 am GMT +0:00 Blenhein Castle 51°N48' 001°W22' 29°‚ 53' Tropical ƒ Placidus 02' 23° „ Ý 06° 46' Á ¿ 21° 15° Ý 06' „ 25' 23° 13' Œ À ¶29° Œ 28° … „ Ü É Ü 06° 36' 26' 25° 43' Œ 51'Ü áá Œ 29° ’ 29° “ àà … ‘ à ‹ – 55' á á 55' á †32' 16° 34' ¼ † 23° 51'Œ 23° ½ † 06' 25° “ ’ † Ê ’ ‹ 43' 35' 35' 06° ‡ Š 17° 43' Œ 09° º ˆ 01' 01' 07° ˆ ‰ ¾ 23° 22° 08° 02' ‡ ¸ Š 46' » Ï 06° 29°ˆ 53' ‰ Page 234 Astrological Summary Chart Point Positions: Churchill Winston Planet Sign Position House Comment The Moon Leo 29°Le36' 11th The Sun Sagittarius 7°Sg43' 3rd Mercury Scorpio 17°Sc35' 2nd Venus Sagittarius 22°Sg01' 3rd Mars Libra 16°Li32' 1st Jupiter Libra 23°Li34' 1st Saturn Aquarius 9°Aq35' 5th Uranus Leo 15°Le13' 11th Neptune Aries 28°Ar26' 8th Pluto Taurus 21°Ta25' 8th The North Node Aries 25°Ar51' 8th The South Node Libra 25°Li51' 2nd The Ascendant Virgo 29°Vi55' 1st The Midheaven Gemini 29°Ge53' 10th The Part of Fortune Capricorn 8°Cp01' 4th Chart Point Aspects Planet Aspect Planet Orb App/Sep The Moon Semisquare Mars 1°56' Applying The Moon Trine Neptune 1°10' Separating The Moon Trine The North Node 3°45' Separating The Moon Sextile The Midheaven 0°17' Applying The Sun Semisquare Jupiter 0°50' Applying The Sun Sextile Saturn 1°52' Applying The Sun Trine Uranus 7°30' Applying Mercury Square Uranus 2°21' Separating Mercury Opposition Pluto 3°49' Applying Venus Sextile -
A Transiting, Terrestrial Planet in a Triple M Dwarf System at 6.9 Parsecs
Draft version June 24, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 THREE RED SUNS IN THE SKY: A TRANSITING, TERRESTRIAL PLANET IN A TRIPLE M DWARF SYSTEM AT 6.9 PARSECS Jennifer G. Winters,1 Amber A. Medina,1 Jonathan M. Irwin,1 David Charbonneau,1 Nicola Astudillo-Defru,2 Elliott P. Horch,3 Jason D. Eastman,1 Eliot Halley Vrijmoet,4 Todd J. Henry,5 Hannah Diamond-Lowe,1 Elaine Winston,1 Xavier Bonfils,6 George R. Ricker,7 Roland Vanderspek,7 David W. Latham,1 Sara Seager,8, 9, 10 Joshua N. Winn,11 Jon M. Jenkins,12 Stephane´ Udry,13 Joseph D. Twicken,14, 12 Johanna K. Teske,15, 16 Peter Tenenbaum,14, 12 Francesco Pepe,13 Felipe Murgas,17, 18 Philip S. Muirhead,19 Jessica Mink,1 Christophe Lovis,13 Alan M. Levine,7 Sebastien´ Lepine´ ,4 Wei-Chun Jao,4 Christopher E. Henze,12 Gabor´ Furesz,´ 7 Thierry Forveille,6 Pedro Figueira,20, 21 Gilbert A. Esquerdo,1 Courtney D. Dressing,22 Rodrigo F. D´ıaz,23, 24 Xavier Delfosse,6 Chris J. Burke,7 Franc¸ois Bouchy,13 Perry Berlind,1 and Jose-Manuel Almenara6 1Center for Astrophysics j Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Departamento de Matem´atica y F´ısica Aplicadas, Universidad Cat´olica de la Sant´ısimaConcepci´on,Alonso de Rivera 2850, Concepci´on, Chile 3Department of Physics, Southern Connecticut State University, 501 Crescent Street, New Haven, CT 06515, USA 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106, USA 5RECONS Institute, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, 17201, USA 6Universit´eGrenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 -
FY13 High-Level Deliverables
National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................ -
Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland)
Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland) American Astronomical Society August, 2019 100 — New Discoveries scope (JWST), as well as other large ground-based and space-based telescopes coming online in the next 100.01 — Review of TESS’s First Year Survey and two decades. Future Plans The status of the TESS mission as it completes its first year of survey operations in July 2019 will bere- George Ricker1 viewed. The opportunities enabled by TESS’s unique 1 Kavli Institute, MIT (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) lunar-resonant orbit for an extended mission lasting more than a decade will also be presented. Successfully launched in April 2018, NASA’s Tran- siting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is well on its way to discovering thousands of exoplanets in orbit 100.02 — The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Sur- around the brightest stars in the sky. During its ini- vey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics tial two-year survey mission, TESS will monitor more from 10-100 AU than 200,000 bright stars in the solar neighborhood at Eric Nielsen1; Robert De Rosa1; Bruce Macintosh1; a two minute cadence for drops in brightness caused Jason Wang2; Jean-Baptiste Ruffio1; Eugene Chiang3; by planetary transits. This first-ever spaceborne all- Mark Marley4; Didier Saumon5; Dmitry Savransky6; sky transit survey is identifying planets ranging in Daniel Fabrycky7; Quinn Konopacky8; Jennifer size from Earth-sized to gas giants, orbiting a wide Patience9; Vanessa Bailey10 variety of host stars, from cool M dwarfs to hot O/B 1 KIPAC, Stanford University (Stanford, California, United States) giants. 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology TESS stars are typically 30–100 times brighter than (Pasadena, California, United States) those surveyed by the Kepler satellite; thus, TESS 3 Astronomy, California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, Califor- planets are proving far easier to characterize with nia, United States) follow-up observations than those from prior mis- 4 Astronomy, U.C. -
Astronomical Distance Scales in the Gaia Era
Astronomical distance scales in the Gaia era F. Mignard1 Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire de la C^oted'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange Bd de l'Observatoire, CS 34229, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France Abstract Overview of the determination of astronomical distances from a metrological standpoint. Distances are considered from the Solar System (planetary dis- tances) to extragalactic distances, with a special emphasis on the fundamental step of the trigonometric stellar distances and the giant leap recently experi- enced in this field thanks to the ESA space astrometry missions Hipparcos and Gaia. 1. Introduction For centuries astronomers had to content themselves with a 2-dimensional world with virtually no access to the depth of the Universe. The world unfolded before their eyes as though everything was taking place on the surface of a spherical envelope with few exceptions for the nearest sources, such as the Moon whose nearness was made obvious from its repeated passages before the Sun (solar eclipses), the planets or the stars (occultations). The size of this sphere was arbitrary and could not be gauged, let alone the idea that the stars could lie at different distances. Until the 17th century a reliable estimate of the true distance to the Sun and of the size of the Solar System remained out of reach, arXiv:1906.09040v1 [astro-ph.SR] 21 Jun 2019 although a good scale model could be accurately devised and actually crafted in the form of delicately adorned orreries (but not all were on-scale). Email address: [email protected] (F. Mignard) 1Published in Comptes Rendus Physique, Special issue: The new International System of Units / Le nouveau Systme international d'units https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1631070519300155 Preprint submitted to Journal of LATEX Templates June 24, 2019 Regarding the sidereal world and the immense vacuum lying beyond Saturn before reaching the first stars, some realistic ideas started emerging a good century later with the assumption that stars are Suns and share more or less the same luminosity. -
Blue Dots Team Transits Working Group Review
**FULL TITLE** ASP Conference Series, Vol. **VOLUME**, **YEAR OF PUBLICATION** **NAMES OF EDITORS** Blue Dots Team Transits Working Group Review A. Sozzetti1, C. Afonso2, R. Alonso3, D. L. Blank4, C. Catala5, H. Deeg6, J. L. Grenfell7, C. Hellier8, D. W. Latham9, D. Minniti10, F. Pont11, and H. Rauer12 Abstract. Transiting planet systems offer an unique opportunity to obser- vationally constrain proposed models of the interiors (radius, composition) and atmospheres (chemistry, dynamics) of extrasolar planets. The spectacular suc- cesses of ground-based transit surveys (more than 60 transiting systems known to-date) and the host of multi-wavelength, spectro-photometric follow-up stud- ies, carried out in particular by HST and Spitzer, have paved the way to the next generation of transit search projects, which are currently ongoing (CoRoT, Kepler), or planned. The possibility of detecting and characterizing transiting Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone of their parent stars appears tanta- lizingly close. In this contribution we briefly review the power of the transit technique for characterization of extrasolar planets, summarize the state of the art of both ground-based and space-borne transit search programs, and illustrate how the science of planetary transits fits within the Blue Dots perspective. 1. Introduction Within the framework of the Blue-Dots Team (BDT) initiative (http://www.blue-dots.net/), the primary goal of the Transits Working Group (TWG) is to gauge the potential and limitations of transit photometry (and follow-up measurements) as a tool 1INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, Strada Osservatorio 20, I-10025 Pino Torinese, Italy 2Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 3Observatoire de Gen´eve, Universit´ede Gen`eve, 51 Ch. -
Asteroseismology
Asteroseismology Gerald Handler Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland Email: [email protected] Abstract Asteroseismology is the determination of the interior structures of stars by using their oscillations as seismic waves. Simple explanations of the astrophysical background and some basic theoretical considerations needed in this rapidly evolving field are followed by introductions to the most important concepts and methods on the basis of example. Previous and potential applications of asteroseismology are reviewed and future trends are attempted to be foreseen. Introduction: variable and pulsating stars Nearly all the physical processes that determine the structure and evolution of stars occur in their (deep) interiors. The production of nuclear energy that powers stars takes place in their cores for most of their lifetime. The effects of the physical processes that modify the simplest models of stellar evolution, such as mixing and diffusion, also predominantly take place in the inside of stars. The light that we receive from the stars is the main information that astronomers can use to study the universe. However, the light of the stars is radiated away from their surfaces, carrying no memory of its origin in the deep interior. Therefore it would seem that there is no way that the analysis of starlight tells us about the physics going on in the unobservable stellar interiors. However, there are stars that reveal more about themselves than others. Variable stars are objects for which one can observe time-dependent light output, on a time scale shorter arXiv:1205.6407v1 [astro-ph.SR] 29 May 2012 than that of evolutionary changes. -
Research Paper in Nature
LETTER doi:10.1038/nature22055 1 A temperate rocky super-Earth transiting a nearby cool star Jason A. Dittmann1, Jonathan M. Irwin1, David Charbonneau1, Xavier Bonfils2,3, Nicola Astudillo-Defru4, Raphaëlle D. Haywood1, Zachory K. Berta-Thompson5, Elisabeth R. Newton6, Joseph E. Rodriguez1, Jennifer G. Winters1, Thiam-Guan Tan7, Jose-Manuel Almenara2,3,4, François Bouchy8, Xavier Delfosse2,3, Thierry Forveille2,3, Christophe Lovis4, Felipe Murgas2,3,9, Francesco Pepe4, Nuno C. Santos10,11, Stephane Udry4, Anaël Wünsche2,3, Gilbert A. Esquerdo1, David W. Latham1 & Courtney D. Dressing12 15 16,17 M dwarf stars, which have masses less than 60 per cent that of Ks magnitude and empirically determined stellar relationships , the Sun, make up 75 per cent of the population of the stars in the we estimate the stellar mass to be 14.6% that of the Sun and the stellar Galaxy1. The atmospheres of orbiting Earth-sized planets are radius to be 18.6% that of the Sun. We estimate the metal content of the observationally accessible via transmission spectroscopy when star to be approximately half that of the Sun ([Fe/H] = −0.24 ± 0.10; all the planets pass in front of these stars2,3. Statistical results suggest errors given in the text are 1σ), and we measure the rotational period that the nearest transiting Earth-sized planet in the liquid-water, of the star to be 131 days from our long-term photometric monitoring habitable zone of an M dwarf star is probably around 10.5 parsecs (see Methods). away4. A temperate planet has been discovered orbiting Proxima On 15 September 2014 ut, MEarth-South identified a potential Centauri, the closest M dwarf5, but it probably does not transit and transit in progress around LHS 1140, and automatically commenced its true mass is unknown. -
COMMISSION 27 VARIABLE STARS 1. Introduction 2. Solar-Like Variables
Transactions IAU, Volume XXVIIA Reports on Astronomy 2006-2009 c 2009 International Astronomical Union Karel A. van der Hucht, ed. DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X COMMISSION 27 VARIABLE STARS ETOILES VARIABLES PRESIDENT Steven D. Kawaler VICE-PRESIDENT Gerald Handler PAST PRESIDENT Conny Aerts ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Tim Bedding, M´arcio Catelan, Margarida Cunha, Laurent Eyer, Simon Jeffery, Peter Martinez, Katalin Olah, Karen Pollard, Seetha Somasundaram TRIENNIAL REPORT 2006-2009 1. Introduction The Organizing Committee of C27 has decided to again provide a somewhat abbrevi- ated bibliography as part of this triennial report, as astronomy-centered search engines and online publications continue to blossom. We focus on selected highlights in variable star research over the past three years. Further results can be found in numerous pro- ceedings of conferences held in the time frame covered by this report. Following the GA of 2006, a number of international meetings considered intrinsically variable stars as a significant element of their program. In September 2006, the Vienna Workshop on the Future of Asteroseismology (Handler & Houdek 2007) celebrated Michel Breger’s 65th birthday. The November, 2006, joint CoRoT/ESTA workshop on Solar/Stellar Models and Seismic Analysis Tools, has proceedings edited by Straka, Lebreton, & Monteiro. The community gathered in July 2007 to honor Prof. Douglas Gough with a conference on Unsolved Problems in Stellar Physics, the proceedings of which were edited by Stan- cliffe et al. (2007). The long series of pulsating star meetings continued in July 2007 with Stellar Pulsation & Cycles of Discovery. Also in July 2007, the 3rd Meeting on Hot Subdwarf Stars and Related Objects was held in Bamberg (Heber et al. -
Front Matter
Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02944-6 — Asteroseismology Edited by Pere L. Pallé , César Esteban Frontmatter More Information ASTEROSEISMOLOGY Our understanding of stars has grown significantly due to recent advances in astero- seismology, the stellar analog of helioseismology, the study of the Sun’s acoustic wave oscillations. Using ground-based and satellite observatories to measure the frequency spectra of starlight, researchers are able to probe beneath a star’s surface and map its interior structure. This volume provides a wide-ranging and up-to-date overview of the theoretical, experimental, and analytical tools for carrying out front-line research in stel- lar physics using asteroseismological observations, tools, and inferences. Chapters from seven eminent scientists in residence at the twenty-second Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics examine the interior of our Sun relative to data collected from distant stars, how to measure the fundamental parameters of single field stars, diffusion pro- cesses, and the effects of rotation on stellar structures. The volume also provides detailed treatments of modeling and computing programs, providing astronomers and graduate students with a practical, methods-based guide. Pere L. Pall´e is a pioneering astrophysicist in the field of helioseismology and head of the Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias’s Research Group for Helioseismology and Asteroseismology. He completed his undergraduate studies and PhD at the University of La Laguna, Spain, and is deeply involved in the deployment, operation, and scientific exploitation of the first Earth-based international helioseismology networks (BiSON, IRIS, GONG), space missions (such as GOLF/SoHO), and asteroseimology networks (SONG). His research is focused on the instrumentation, analysis, and interpretation of solar and stellar internal structures and dynamics by means of seismology tools.