Federated Hermes Managed Volatility Fund II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federated Hermes Managed Volatility Fund II Annual Shareholder Report December 31, 2020 Share Class Primary Service Federated Hermes Managed Volatility Fund II (formerly, Federated Managed Volatility Fund II) A Portfolio of Federated Hermes Insurance Series (formerly, Federated Insurance Series) Dear Valued Shareholder, I am pleased to present the Annual Shareholder Report for your fund covering the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. While Covid-19 continues to present challenges to our lives, families and businesses, I want you to know that Federated Hermes remains dedicated to helping you successfully navigate the markets ahead. You can count on us for the insights, investment management knowledge and client service that you have come to expect. Please refer to our website, FederatedInvestors.com, for timely updates on this and other economic and market matters. Thank you for investing with us. I hope you find this information useful and look forward to keeping you informed. Sincerely, John B. Fisher, President Not FDIC Insured ▪ May Lose Value ▪ No Bank Guarantee CONTENTS Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance ................................................................................................ 1 Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables ........................................................................................................ 6 Portfolio of Investments .............................................................................................................................. 7 Financial Highlights .................................................................................................................................... 27 Statement of Assets and Liabilities ................................................................................................................. 29 Statement of Operations ............................................................................................................................. 30 Statement of Changes in Net Assets............................................................................................................... 31 Notes to Financial Statements....................................................................................................................... 32 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm................................................................................... 39 Shareholder Expense Example ..................................................................................................................... 40 Board of Trustees and Trust Officers ............................................................................................................... 41 Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract................................................................................................... 45 Liquidity Risk Management Program – Annual Evaluation of Adequacy and Effectiveness.............................................. 50 Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities ...................................................................................................... 51 Quarterly Portfolio Schedule ........................................................................................................................ 51 Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance (unaudited) The total return of Federated Hermes Managed Volatility Fund II (the “Fund”), based on net asset value for the 12-month reporting period ended December 31, 2020, was 0.93% for the Primary Shares and 0.71% for the Service Shares. The 0.93% total return of the Primary Shares for the reporting period consisted of -1.86% in price depreciation and 2.79% in reinvested dividends. For the same period, the Russell 1000® Value Index (R1000V) returned 2.80%, and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (BBAB) returned 7.51%. Weighting these benchmarks (40% R1000V, 60% BBAB), the blended index (“Blended Index”)1 return for the period was 6.56%. The Fund’s total return for the most recently completed fiscal year reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses, which are not reflected in the total return of the Blended Index. The Fund’s investment strategy focused on income-earning investments, specifically equity and fixed-income2 securities that have high income potential through: (1) portfolio allocation; (2) sector security selection for equities and; (3) sector and security selection for bonds to achieve the Fund’s objectives of high current income and moderate capital appreciation. In addition, the Fund implements an equity futures strategy for volatility control purposes. MARKET OVERVIEW The reporting period will forever be defined by the Covid-19 global pandemic. The first quarter saw global Covid-19 cases spike, and equity markets plummeted in response. From February 19th through March 23rd the S&P 500® Index3 experienced its fastest 30% decline in history, bottoming down 33.92% from its prior closing high. The CBOE Volatility Index® (VIX)4 – a commonly referred to measure of fear in the market – reached levels not seen since the Great Recession of 2008, closing on March 16th at an all-time high of 82.69. In response to the exogenous shock to the economy from Covid-19, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) cut the federal funds target rate by 100 basis points to a range of 0.0% to 0.25%. In addition, the Fed re-instituted several liquidity programs that were first created in the Great Recession of 2008. Specifically, the Fed intervened to provide liquidity to the U.S Treasury, commercial paper, agency mortgage backed,5 and investment-grade6 corporate markets. The U.S. Congress also responded to the pandemic by approving a $2 trillion-dollar fiscal stimulus package at the end of the first quarter and approved an additional $900 billion stimulus package at the end of the year. These actions helped to propel markets back to all-time highs in a record period of time, with the market retaking its February 19th closing high on August 18th. Despite seeing a second and third wave of infections in the second half of the year, the combination of accommodative monetary and fiscal policy, the resolution of the 2020 Presidential election and the development of breakthrough Covid-19 vaccines led to positive total returns for all major U.S. equity and fixed-income markets. The S&P 500 returned 18.40% for the reporting period. In general, value stocks underperformed growth stocks, with cyclical sectors outperforming defensive sectors. The S&P 500’s weak performance in the Energy and Financials sectors was overshadowed by stronger performance in the Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communications sectors. On the fixed-income side, the negative economic impacts from the Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting monetary and fiscal policies implemented to handle the crisis, along with some uncertainty around the Presidential election in the fourth quarter, were the primary drivers of fixed-income markets in 2020. In addition to the aforementioned Fed reaction to the initial wave of the virus, in the 3rd quarter the Fed also announced the results of its recently completed monetary policy framework review, which established the following three necessary conditions for future rate hikes: (1) levels of employment consistent with maximum employment; (2) inflation of at least 2%; and (3) inflation on track to moderately exceed 2% for some time. This new framework is a more dovish approach, since it will allow inflation to exceed 2% for a period of time to ensure the Fed has achieved its 2% inflation target. For the reporting period, the total return of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Index7 was 8.0%, compared to the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Capped Index8 total return of 7.05%, the Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Index9 total return of 6.5%, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Index10 of 9.9%, and the Bloomberg Barclays MBS Index11 of 3.9%. PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION During the reporting period, the Fund’s portfolio was allocated between stocks and fixed-income securities in a manner reflecting the Fund’s primary investment objective of income and its secondary objective of capital appreciation. Factors used in making this allocation were: (1) the Fund’s ability to pay and maintain an attractive level of dividends;12 and (2) the expected relative total return of fixed-income securities and stocks. The allocation at the end of the reporting period was 54% fixed-income securities, 43% stocks and 3% cash equivalents and other assets/liabilities. Annual Shareholder Report 1 During the reporting period, the Fund invested in S&P 500 futures contracts13 for volatility risk management purposes. The first and second quarters of 2020 contained record volatility spikes, causing the Fund to reduce its volatility overlay to the bottom end of its range. However, the Fund ended the year with a moderate long futures allocation. The short futures exposure, particularly in the second quarter, was the major negative contributor to Fund performance for the reporting period. Despite the large volatility in the first half of the year, the low levels of the overlay helped to cause the realized, annualized daily volatility of the Fund to fall within its 8%-12% target range, at 11.5%. Furthermore, at the end of the reporting period, the Fund had a futures volatility overlay of 26%. Relative to the Blended Index, the Fund’s equity and bond allocation, other than the overlay, had a
Recommended publications
  • Darlene K. Susa-Anderson UL
    Fall Meeting Arlington, Virginia September 24-25, 2019 GHS in Asia Darlene K. Susa-Anderson UL Presenter biography Darlene Susa-Anderson is Senior Manager, Regulatory Affairs at UL (Underwriters Laboratories). She received her MS degree in Pharmacology-Toxicology from Duquesne University and her MS degree in Information Science from the University of Pittsburgh. Darlene received her BA degree from Carlow College in Pittsburgh, where she graduated Summa cum Laude with a double major in Biology and Mathematics. Darlene's 38+ years of experience include employment at the former Gulf Oil Corporation, Koppers Company, Calgon Corporation, and Fisher Scientific. Darlene's immediate past position prior to employment at ChemADVISOR was Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance at Fisher Scientific. Ms. Susa-Anderson co-chaired the Chemical Manufacturers Association (now known as the American Chemistry Council) Labeling Work Group to revise the ANSI Standard for Industrial Chemicals - Industrial Labeling (ANSI Z129.1-1999) and was a member of the work group that revised the 1994 edition of this same standard. She also was a member of the work group that revised the ANSI Standard for Industrial Chemicals - MSDS Preparation (ANSI Z400.1-1998). Ms. Susa-Anderson served as Program Co-Chair for the Society for Chemical Hazard Communication (SCHC) for five years. She completed two terms on its Board of Directors (serving as Chairperson of the SCHC Board for the 2011-12 term) and additionally served as Vice President, President and Past President. Presentation abstract This presentation will provide an overview of GHS implementation status in the Asia Pacific region for 12 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Companies Offering Matching Gifts Below Is a Partial List of Area Companies Offering Matching Gifts
    Area Companies Offering Matching Gifts Below is a partial list of area companies offering matching gifts. Please check to see if your employer is on the list and/or check with your company if they offer the program. If your employer offers a matching gift program, please request a matching gift form from your employer or fill out their online form. Matching gifts can be made to the Tredyffrin Township Libraries, Paoli Library or Tredyffrin Public Library. Aetna FMC Corporation PNC Financial Services AIG GATX PPG Industries Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. GE Foundation PQ Corporation Allstate Foundation GlaxoSmithKline Procter & Gamble Altria Group, Inc. Glenmede Prudential Financial American Express Company Hillman Company PVR Partners, L.P. American International Group, Inc. Houghton Mifflin Quaker Chemical Corporation AmeriGas Propane, Inc. IBM Corporation Quest Diagnostics AON J.P. Morgan Chase Ross Arkema Inc. John Hancock Saint-Gobain Corporation Automatic Data Processing Johnson & Johnson Sandmeyer Steel Company AXA Foundation, Inc. JP Morgan Chase SAP Matching Gift Program Axiom Data, Inc. Kaplan Inc. Schering-Plough Foundation Bank of America Kellogg Schroder Investment Management Bemis Company Foundation KPMG LLP Shell Oil Company Berwind Corporation Liberty Mutual State Farm Companies Foundation BlackRock Lincoln Financial Group Subaru of America Boeing Company May Department Stores Sun Life Financial BP McDonald's Sun Microsystems, Inc Bristol-Myers Squibb Company McKesson Foundation Sunoco, Inc. C. R. Bard, Inc. Merck & Co., Inc. Tenet Healthcare Foundation CertainTeed Merrill Lynch Texas Instruments Charles Schwab Merrill Lynch ACE INA Foundation Chevron Corporation Microsoft AXA Foundation Chubb Group of Insurance Companies Minerals Technologies Inc. Dow Chemical Company CIGNA Foundation Mobil Foundation Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry
    The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry Prepared For Prepared By Executive Summary Introduction Despite the current difficulties facing the global economy as a whole and the oil and natural gas industry specifically, the Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry will likely continue to be a major source of energy production, employment, gross domestic product, and government revenues for the United States. Several proposals have been advanced recently which would have a major impact on the industry’s activity levels, and the economic activity supported by the Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and natural gas industry. The proposals vary widely, but for the purpose of this report three scenarios were developed, a scenario based on a continuation of current policies and regulations, a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new offshore leases, and a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new drilling permits approvals in the Gulf of Mexico. Energy and Industrial Advisory Partners (EIAP) was commissioned by the National Ocean Industry Association (NOIA) to develop a report forecasting activity levels, spending, oil and natural gas production, supported employment, GDP, and Government Revenues in these scenarios. The scenarios developed in this report are based solely upon government and other publicly available data and EIAP’s own expertise and analysis. The study also included profiles of NOIA members to demonstrate the diverse group of companies which make up the offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry as well as a list of over 2,400 suppliers to the industry representing all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Headline Discoveries Making Science Matter®
    Volume 5, Issue 2 Fall 2009 FISHER SCIENCE EDUCATION CATALOG 2009 Now with “Teach Green” and “Eco-friendly Products” icons to highlight INSIDE THIS ISSUE: products that help you “green up” your classroom and lab! ASTRONOMY ....................................1, 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ...9, 14-15 AP Science • Earth and Space Science • Biology • Forensics • Biotechnology • BIOLOGY .....................................8, 20-22 GENERAL SCIENCE ..............................4 Physics • Chemistry • Environmental Science • Safety…and more CROSSWORD ......................................24 MEDICINE........................................8, 11 Fisher Science Education Elementary Catalog 2009 EARTH SCIENCE .............................3, 16 TECHNOLOGY ..................3, 5, 10, 17-19 • An exciting resource filled with more than 200 new products EDUCATION............................5-6, 13, 23 • Many products address NSES & NCTM standards • FREE shipping on all orders over $150 Now includes new choking hazard (16CFR1500.19) alerts. Fisher Science Education Price offers in this publication are good until Looking for “paperless” catalogs? holds first Teachers Workshop— December 31, 2009 unless otherwise stated. Catalogs on CD also available. see page 6. FISHER SCIENCE EDUCATION HEADLINE DISCOVERIES Making Science Matter® RAISING MILLIONS OF EYES TO THE NIGHT SKIES INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF ASTRONOMY 2009 In 1609, an Italian physicist by the name of Galileo Gali- Using a 100-inch reflector, the largest telescope in its day, The IAU, which serves as the internationally recognized au- lei peered inquisitively into the eyepiece of a telescope—a Hubble observed a pair of celestial clouds known as Androm- thority for assigning designations to celestial bodies, will hold crude instrument that he had created with a magnification of eda and Triangulum, and focused on individual stars in the its next general assembly in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in August about 15-20X.
    [Show full text]
  • OSB Participant List by Research Area and Industry
    OSB Participant List by Research Area and Industry Contact Centers (CC) • CPS Energy • Beijing Benz Automotive • Mack Trucks Consumer Products/Packaged • Direct Energy • Beiqi Foton Motor • Magna Goods Company • Louisville Water Company • Mazda Motor Corporation • Clarke American • BMW • Manila Electric Company • Navistar International • Newell Rubbermaid • Bosch Engineering Financial Management (FM) Solutions • Nissan Financial Services/Banking • Aerospace Brembo • Opel • Bank of America • • Advanced Coating Caterpillar • Paccar • Charles Schwab & Technologies • Company China FAW Group • Porsche Automobil • Airbus • Citigroup • China International • Proeza • Alliant Techsystems Marine Containers • Federal Reserve Bank of • • Proton Holdings Minneapolis • BE Aerospace Chrysler • John Deere • • PSA Peugeot Citroën • Bombardier Commercial Vehicle Group • Mellon Financial • PT Astra International • Cobham • Daihatsu Motor • Morgan Stanley • Rane Engine Valves • Dassault Aviation • Daimler • NetBank • Renault • European Aeronautic • Delphi • Sterling Bank Defence and Space • Robert Bosch Company • DENSO Corporation • TIAA-CREF • SAIC Motor • Finmeccanica • Denway Motors • Union National Bank • SG&G • Fuji • DGP Hinoday Industries • Washington Mutual • Sinotruk Group Jinan • General Dynamics • Eaton Commercial Vehicle • Wells Fargo • General Electric • FAW Jiefang Automotive • Ssangyong Motor Industrial Products Company • IHI Corporation • Fiat • Suzuki Motor • John Deere • Kawasaki • Ford Motor Company • Tenedora Nemark Insurance • Korean
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks to Our Donors
    Celebrating DONORS and volunteer leadership PHOTO: LISA KYLE 2004 Left to right: Dolly Ellenberg, Vice President, Development; Suzy Broadhurst, Chair, Board of Trustees and Interim President; Maxwell King, President, Heinz Endowments; and Janet Sarbaugh, Program Director of the Heinz Endowments Arts & Culture Program 36 CARNEGIE • SUMMER 2005 Traditionally, the role of museums was primarily to preserve the past. Today, museums —particularly the four Carnegie Museums —play a Some of the key people we must thank for helping us reach these much more important role in people’s lives and in the development achievements are: of the communities they serve. Time after time, our museums amaze • Janie Thompson, chair of the Trustee/Board Annual Giving Fund us with the thought-provoking exhibitions, innovative educational and Development Committee. programs, special events, and community partnerships they develop and the impact they have on our region. • Peter Veeder, chair of the Annual Sustaining Fund. • Ray Steeb and Lou Cestello, co-chairs of the Corporate Yet, none of these things would be possible without the generosity of Committee. our many wonderful supporters, some of whom you’ll read about on the following pages. Carnegie Museums has always been inspired to • Debbie Dick, chair of the Individual Gifts Committee. reach out to the region and do great things by the passionate support These individuals give so much of themselves year after year and truly and strong commitment of our donors —and we’ve thrived as a result. lead by example. We are thankful for their support and friendship. Over the years, one of our most remarkable supporters has also We would also like to take this opportunity to recognize three other been one of our most steadfast: The Heinz Endowments.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 168 Third Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, U.S.A
    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 168 Third Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, U.S.A. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. 2007 EMPLOYEES' STOCK PURCHASE PLAN AS AMENDED AND RESTATED (THE "ESPP") Prospectus for the employees of certain European Economic Area ("EEA") subsidiaries of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., subject to the applicable legislation in each country Pursuant to articles L. 412-1 and L. 621-8 of the Code monétaire et financier and its General Regulation, in particular articles 211-1 to 216-1 thereof, the Autorité des marchés financiers ("AMF") has attached visa number 17-618 dated November 29, 2017, onto this prospectus. This prospectus was established by the issuer and incurs the responsibility of its signatories. The visa, pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 621-8-1-I of the Code monétaire et financier, was granted after the AMF verified that the document is complete and comprehensible, and that the information it contains is consistent. The visa represents neither the approval of the worthiness of the operation nor the authentication of the financial and accounting information presented. This prospectus will be made available in printed form to employees of the EEA subsidiaries of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. based in countries in which an offering under the ESPP is considered a public offering, subject to the applicable legislation in each country, at the respective head offices of their employers. In addition, this prospectus along with summary translations (as applicable) will be posted on Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s intranet and free copies will be available to the employees upon request by contacting the human resources departments of their employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the School of Medicine
    2019 Annual Report UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE REFLECTION University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine 2019 ANNUAL REPORT REFLECTION 2 A Job Well Done 6 News & Achievements 14 Education & Training 26 Research Grants of Note, 27 Publications of Note, 30 42 Community 47 Donors 62 Administration, Departments, Institutes, & Leadership COVER: Alessandro Gottardo A shooting star is said to reap good fortune — and, in reflecting upon the past two decades, Arthur S. Levine, MD, was in many ways a shooting star for the University of Pittsburgh. n past years, annual report readers have been greeted on page one with a thoughtful column by Arthur S. Levine, MD, senior vice chancellor for the health sciences and John and Gertrude Petersen Dean of the School of Medicine. However, this year is not a typical year because Dr. Levine will step down from his leadership positions, once his successor arrives in June 2020 (see below). So, in lieu of his column, the annual report leads off with the story of Dr. Levine’s tenure, Iencapsulating quite a journey for him and for the University of Pittsburgh In addition, the report is packed with news emanating from the School of Medicine and the achievements of its students and faculty. All is worthy of reflection. Anticipation n January 7, 2020, Anantha Shekhar, MD, PhD, a nationally recognized educator, researcher, and entrepreneur with major contributions in medicine and life sciences, was named senior vice chancellor for the health sciences and John and Gertrude Petersen Dean of the School of Medicine. His start date is June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Your Disability Inclusion
    Specific actions include: • Formed the GM Disability Advisory Council made up of representation from cross-functional executives (e.g., public policy, communications, IT, human resources, facilities, talent acquisition, safety, health) • Added Closed Captioning to all quarterly broadcasts • Delivered focused training to recruiters to increase disability hiring • Launched a voluntary self-ID campaign to encourage employee self-reporting MEASURING YOUR • Enhanced the company’s reasonable accommodations process for salaried employees to accelerate the response time • Expanded OnStar to include “OnStar Auto Fuel” affordable gas delivery program to Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac vehicle owners. This added service is in addition to the 3-year free OnStar plan for people with disabilities DISABILITY • Incorporated the disability employee resource group into the new/emerging mobility technology process (e.g., autonomous vehicles) – this is in addition to the “GM Mobility” structure in place to give discounts to customers with disabilities who need to adapt their vehicles TAKE ACTION INCLUSION The DEI, by AAPD and the Disability:IN, is a trusted resource for Fortune 500-1000 and Am Law 200 companies that are moving beyond social responsibility and into long-term sustainability through inclusion. Registration opens every summer until fall at www.disabilityequalityindex.org. Contact Becky Curran ([email protected]), DEI Director, to get your company started. 2018 BEST PLACES TO WORK FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES TOP SCORERS - DEI RATING 100 3M Company Cigna HP Inc. Southern Company Accenture Comcast NBCUniversal Huntington National Bank Spaulding Rehabilitation Aetna Corning Intel Corporation Network AMC Theatres CVS Health JPMorgan Chase & Co. Sprint Corporation Ameren Corporation Dell Inc. Kaiser Permanente State Street Corporation American Airlines Deloitte KPMG Synchrony American Electric Power Delta Air Lines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Philip Cynar Pittsburgh Regional Alliance 412-281-4783, Ext
    Contact: Philip Cynar Pittsburgh Regional Alliance 412-281-4783, ext. 4573 [email protected] Pittsburgh Regional Alliance Partnership is Selected as One of the Nation’s Top 10 Economic Development Groups For a Third Consecutive Year, Recognition from Leading Commercial Real Estate Publication Validates the Pittsburgh Region’s Economic Development Momentum (PITTSBURGH – April 26, 2010) – The Pittsburgh Regional Alliance (PRA) Partnership has been named one of the nation’s Top 10 economic development groups by Site Selection magazine. This distinction is based on its performance in 2009 across a range of criteria including total capital investment in the region, total jobs created, the contributions of regional economic development partners toward the attainment of these numbers, overall economic vitality, scope of economic strength, diversity of industry and ability to generate breakthrough deals. An affiliate of the Allegheny Conference on Community Development, the PRA is the 10-county Pittsburgh region’s public-private economic development partnership that markets the benefits of conducting business in southwestern Pennsylvania to companies worldwide that are growing, relocating or expanding. Recently, the PRA Partnership announced its own annual inventory of regional economic development deals, or ―wins‖, and 2009 was a respectable year for the region, despite one of the deepest economic downturns in history. In line with Site Selection’s own criteria for a top economic development organization, the PRA’s inventory of regional economic development projects included $3 billion in capital investments and 197 corporate expansion, relocation and development projects. These projects are expected to create, over time, 7,238 new jobs for the Pittsburgh region and will retain 8,683 jobs—representing total employment impact of approximately 16,000 jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 14A
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (RULE 14a-101) SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ¨ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant x Check the appropriate box: ¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement. ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). ¨ Definitive Proxy Statement. x Definitive Additional Materials. ¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12. NRG ENERGY, INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) EXELON CORPORATION (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
    [Show full text]
  • January 1993
    PITTSBURGH HISTORY & LANDMARKS FOUNDATION oNE STATION SQUARE, SUITE 450 PITTSBURGH, PA 15219 -II7 O Address Correction Requested Published for the members of the Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation No. 127 January 1993 a A r c hit e cture Aft e r Richards o n a Station Square and a New Bridge a A Letter to Our Members: Looking Back on 1992 Pittsburgh Architecture: Emergent Architecture The P r o s ect of.oo On Ocøber 19, 1992, the trustees of Preservation Fund Authority of Pittsburgh, and the local a Portable Pittsburgh a th,e Pitæburgh Hßøry & lnndntarlæ Stanley Lowe, director of Land- Department of Housing and Urban Landmark Surv ivors video marks' Preservation Fund, will: Development to foster more and better a Architecture: The Building Art exhibit Foundation approu ed, the þIlowing inner-city restoration programs and a Ar c hit e c t s - Ìn- t he - S c ho o I s program o work with lending institutions to aug- worlt planfor the land,marlx sffiin affordable housing development projects a slide shows ment the program assets of Landmarks' work with Landmarks and lending a private group tours 1993. Program ffir'ts continue to Preservation Fund institutions to offer summer intern . work with the Borough of Wilkinsburg The highpoint of the year will be the concentrate on historic prcperty res- opportunities with neighborhood/ to revitalize an abandoned school for Hands-On History Festtval in the toration an d, neighborh,ood, assistarrce community groups area youths Station Square Festival tent on May 8. through La.ndnnrl$' Preseru
    [Show full text]