DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 95/Thursday, May 16, 2002/Proposed Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 95/Thursday, May 16, 2002/Proposed Rules Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2002 / Proposed Rules 34893 in a way that obscures the postal code; instructions and online registration critical habitat for the Appalachian and forms for registering your domain name. elktoe. (2) Inclusion of the word ‘‘city’’ or To register your domain name you will ‘‘town’’ within the domain name is need to provide information such as SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife optional and may be used at the your desired domain name, sponsoring Service, announce that we will hold two discretion of the local government. organization, points of contact, and at public hearings on the proposed (b) The preferred format for city least two name server addresses. determination of critical habitat for the governments is to denote the State Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta postal code after the city name, § 102–173.75 How long does the process raveneliana) and that the comment optionally separated by a dash. take? period on this proposal is reopened. We Examples of preferred domain names The process can be completed within also announce the availability of the include: 48 hours if all information received is draft economic analysis of this proposed (1) chicago-il.gov; complete and accurate. Most requests designation of critical habitat. We are (2) cityofcharleston-sc.gov; take up to thirty (30) days because the reopening the comment period for the (3) charleston-wv.gov; and registrar is waiting for CIO approval. proposal to designate critical habitat for (4) townofdumfries-va.gov. this species to hold the public hearings (c) If third-level domain naming is § 102–173.80 How will I know if my request and to allow all interested parties to is approved? available from the State government, comment simultaneously on the cities and towns are encouraged to A registration confirmation notice is proposed rule and the associated draft register for a domain name under a sent within one business day after you economic analysis. Comments State’s registered second-level (e.g., register your domain name, informing previously submitted need not be chicago.il.gov) in accordance with the you that your registration information resubmitted and will be fully policies established by the State was received. If all of your information considered in the final determination of government. is accurate and complete, a second the proposal. notice will be sent to you within one DATES: Comments: The comment period § 102–173.60 What is the naming business day, informing you that all of is hereby reopened until July 1, 2002. convention for Counties or Parishes? your information is in order. If you are We must receive comments on the (a) To register any second-level ineligible, or if the information provided proposal and draft economic analysis domain within dot-gov, County or is incorrect or incomplete, your from all interested parties by the closing Parish governments must register the registration will be rejected and a notice date. Any comments that we receive County’s or Parish’s name or will be sent to you stating the reason for after the closing date will not be abbreviation, the word ‘‘county’’ or rejection. Registration requests will be considered in the final decision on this ‘‘parish’’ (because many counties have activated within two business days after proposal. the same name as cities within the same receiving valid authorization from the Public Hearings: The first public State), and a reference to the State in appropriate CIO. Once your domain hearing on the proposal will be held which the county or parish is located. name has been activated, a notice will June 4, 2002, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. in However, the use of the State postal be sent to you. Erwin, TN, and the second, on June 6, code should not be embedded within a 2002, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. in Bryson single word in a way that obscures the § 102–173.85 How long will my application be held, waiting for my CIO approval? City, NC. postal code. ADDRESSES: The first public hearing will (b) The preferred format for county or Registrations will be held in reserve status for sixty (60) days pending CIO be held in the auditorium of the Unicoi parish governments is to denote the County High School, 700 Mohawk State postal code after the county or authorization from your sponsoring organization. Drive, Erwin, TN. The second public parish, optionally separated by a dash. hearing will be held in the Swain Examples of preferred domain names Dated: May 9, 2002. County Administration Building, include: G. Martin Wagner, Superior Court Room, 101 Mitchell (1) richmondcounty-ga.gov; Associate Administrator, Office of (2) pwc-county-va.gov; and Street, Bryson City, NC. Governmentwide Policy. Copies of the draft economic analysis (3) countyofdorchestor-sc.gov. [FR Doc. 02–12127 Filed 5–15–02; 8:45 am] (c) If third-level domain naming is are available on the Internet at http:// available from the State government, BILLING CODE 6820–34–P southeast.fws.gov/hotissues or by counties or parishes are encouraged to writing to or calling the State register for a domain name under a Supervisor, Asheville Field Office, U.S. State’s registered second-level (e.g., DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service, 160 Zillicoa richmondcounty.ga.gov). Street, Asheville, NC 28801; telephone Fish and Wildlife Service 828/258–3939. § 102–173.65 What is the naming If you wish to comment, you may convention for Native Sovereign Nations? 50 CFR Part 17 submit your comments by any one of To register any second-level domain RIN 1018–AH33 several methods: in dot-gov, Native Sovereign Nations 1. You may submit written comments may register any second-level domain Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and information to the State Supervisor, name provided that it contains the and Plants; Designating Critical Asheville Field Office, U.S. Fish and registering NSN name followed by a Habitat for the Appalachian Elktoe Wildlife Service, 160 Zillicoa Street, suffix of ‘‘-NSN.gov’’ (case insensitive). Asheville, NC 28801. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 2. You may hand-deliver written § 102–173.70 Where do I register my dot- Interior. comments to our Asheville Field Office, gov domain name? ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public at the above address or fax your Registration is an online process at hearings, availability of draft economic comments to 828/258–5330. http://nic.gov. At the Network analysis, and reopening of comment 3. You may send comments by Information Site (NIC), you will find the period for the proposed designation of electronic mail (e-mail) to VerDate May<13>2002 09:31 May 15, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM pfrm13 PsN: 16MYP1 34894 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2002 / Proposed Rules [email protected]. For directions on Tuckasegee River in Jackson and Swain attendance, the time allotted for oral how to submit electronic filing of Counties, NC; 14.6 km (9.1 rm) of the statements may have to be limited. Oral comments, see the ‘‘Public Comments Cheoah River in Graham County, NC; and written statements receive equal Solicited’’ section. 7.5 km (4.7 rm) of the Little River in consideration. There are no limits to the 4. You may provide oral and/or Transylvania County, NC; 17.8 km (11.1 length of written comments presented at written comments at either of the public rm) of the West Fork Pigeon River and the hearings or mailed to us. Our final hearings. the Pigeon River in Haywood County, determination on the proposed critical Comments and materials received, as NC; 22.6 km (14.1 rm) of the South Toe habitat will take into consideration well as supporting documentation used River and 26.4 km (16.5 rm) of the Cane comments and any additional in preparation of this proposed rule, River in Yancey County, NC; 5.9 km (3.7 information received by the date will be available for public inspection, rm) of the North Toe River and 34.6 km specified above. All previous comments by appointment, during normal business (21.6 rm) of the Toe River in Yancey and and information submitted during the hours at the above address. Mitchell Counties, NC; and 21.6 km comment period need not be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. (13.5 rm) of the Nolichucky River in resubmitted. Written comments may be John A. Fridell, Fish and Wildlife Yancey and Mitchell Counties, NC, and submitted to the State Supervisor (see Biologist, Asheville Field Office (see Unicoi County, TN. The initial comment ADDRESSES section). ADDRESSES section) (telephone 828/258– period on the proposal closed on April Please submit electronic comments as 3939, extension 225). 9, 2001. an ASCII file format and avoid the use Section 4(b)(5)(E) of the Act requires of special characters and encryption. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: that a public hearing be held if Please also include ‘‘Attn: RIN 1018– requested within 45 days of the Background AH33’’ and your name and return proposal’s publication in the Federal address in your e-mail message. If you The Appalachian elktoe is endemic to Register. Two groups requested public do not receive a confirmation from the the upper Tennessee River drainage in hearings within the specified timeframe system that we have received your e- western North Carolina and eastern of the initial comment period. One mail message, please contact us directly Tennessee. Historic and recent records group requested hearings in every indicate that the species was once fairly county where critical habitat is by calling our Asheville Field Office widely distributed throughout the upper proposed; the other group requested (see ADDRESSES section).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 66, No. 27/Thursday, February 8, 2001/Proposed Rules
    9540 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 27 / Thursday, February 8, 2001 / Proposed Rules impose a minimal burden on small regulatory effect of the critical habitat white to bluish-white, changing to a entities. designation does not extend beyond salmon, pinkish, or brownish color in those activities funded, permitted, or the central and beak cavity portions of E. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, carried out by Federal agencies. State or the shell; some specimens may be Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed private actions, with no Federal marked with irregular brownish Rules involvement, are not affected. blotches (adapted from Clarke 1981). 37. None. Section 4 of the Act requires us to Clarke (1981) contains a detailed consider the economic and other description of the species’ shell, with Ordering Clauses relevant impacts of specifying any illustrations; Ortmann (1921) discussed 38. Pursuant to Sections 1, 3, 4, 201– particular area as critical habitat. We soft parts. 205, 251 of the Communications Act of solicit data and comments from the Distribution, Habitat, and Life History 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 153, public on all aspects of this proposal, 154, 201–205, and 251, this Second including data on the economic and The Appalachian elktoe is known Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking other impacts of the designation. We only from the mountain streams of is hereby Adopted. may revise this proposal to incorporate western North Carolina and eastern 39. The Commission’s Consumer or address comments and other Tennessee. Although the complete Information Bureau, Reference information received during the historical range of the Appalachian Information Center, Shall Send a copy comment period.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Threatened and Endangered Animal Species (North Carolina): Survey Window and Responsibility
    Federally Threatened and Endangered Animal Species (North Carolina): Survey Window and Responsibility Common Name Scientific Name Recommended Survey Window* Consulting Resource Agencies AQUATIC MAMMALS Blue whale (E)** Balaenoptera musculus April - August NMFS Fin whale (E)** Balaenoptera physalus April - August NMFS Humpback whale (E)** Megaptera novaeangliae April - August NMFS North Atlantic right whale (E)** Eubalaena glacialis April - August NMFS Sei whale (E)** Balaenoptera borealis April - August NMFS Sperm whale (E)** Physeter macrocephalus April - August NMFS ARACHNIDS Spruce-fir moss spider (E)** Microhexura montivaga May - August USFWS BIRDS Year round; November - March (optimal to observe birds and nest); February - Bald eagle (BGPA) Haliaeetus leucocephalus May (optimal to observe active nesting) USFWS Piping plover (T&E) Charadrius melodus Year round USFWS Red-cockaded woodpecker (E) Picoides borealis Year round; November - early March (optimal) USFWS Roseate tern (E) Sterna dougallii June - August USFWS Rufa red knot (T) Calidris canutus rufa Year round USFWS Wood stork (T) Mycteria americana April 15 - July 15 USFWS FISH Atlantic sturgeon (E)** Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus Not required; assume presence in appropriate waters NMFS Cape Fear shiner (E) Notropis mekistocholas April - June or periods of high flow (tributaries); Year round (large rivers) USFWS No survey window established at this time, per NOAA Southeast Fisheries Giant manta ray (T) Manta birostris Science Center. NMFS No survey window established at this
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report- HWY-2009-16 Propagation and Culture of Federally Listed Freshwater Mussel Species
    Final Report- HWY-2009-16 Propagation and Culture of Federally Listed Freshwater Mussel Species Prepared By Jay F- Levine, Co-Principal Investigator1 Christopher B- Eads, Co-Investigator1 Renae Greiner, Graduate Student Assistant1 Arthur E- Bogan, Co- Investigator2 1North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine 4700 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, NC 27606 2 NC State Museum of Natural Sciences 4301 Reedy Creek Rd- Raleigh, NC 27607 November 2011 Technical Report Documentation Page 1- Report No- 2-Government Accession No- 3- Recipient’s Catalog No- FHWA/NC/2009-16 4- Title and Subtitle 5- Report Date Propagation and Culture of Federally Listed Freshwater November 2011 Mussel Species 6-Performing Organization Code 7- Author(s) 8-Performing Organization Report No- Jay F- Levine, Co-Principal Investigator Arthur E- Bogan, Co-Principal Investigator Renae Greiner, Graduate Student Assistant 9- Performing Organization Name and Address 10- Work Unit No- (TRAIS) North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine 11- Contract or Grant No- 4700 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, NC 27606 12- Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13-Type of Report and Period Covered North Carolina Department of Transportation Final Report P-O- Box 25201 August 16, 2008 – June 30, 2011 Raleigh, NC 27611 14- Sponsoring Agency Code HWY-2009-16 15- Supplementary Notes 16- Abstract Road and related crossing construction can markedly alter stream habitat and adversely affect resident native flora. The National Native Mussel Conservation Committee has recognized artificial propagation and culture as an important potential management tool for sustaining remaining freshwater mussel populations and has called for additional propagation research to help conserve and restore this faunal group.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally-Listed Wildlife Species
    Assessment for the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs March 2014 Federally-Listed Wildlife Species Ten federally-endangered (E) or threatened (T) wildlife species are known to occur on or immediately adjacent to the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests (hereafter, the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs). These include four small mammals, two terrestrial invertebrates, three freshwater mussels, and one fish (Table 1). Additionally, two endangered species historically occurred on or adjacent to the Forest, but are considered extirpated, or absent, from North Carolina and are no longer tracked by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (Table 1). Table 1. Federally-listed wildlife species known to occur or historically occurring on or immediately adjacent to the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Small Mammals Carolina northern flying Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered squirrel Gray myotis Myotis grisescens Endangered Virginia big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii Endangered virginianus Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered* Indiana bat Myotis sodalis Endangered Terrestrial Invertebrates Spruce-fir moss spider Microhexura montivaga Endangered noonday globe Patera clarki Nantahala Threatened Freshwater Mussels Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana Endangered Little-wing pearlymussel Pegius fabula Endangered Cumberland bean Villosa trabilis Endangered Spotfin chub Erimonax monachus Threatened Species Considered Extirpated From North Carolina American burying beetle Nicrophorous americanus Endangered Eastern cougar Puma concolor cougar Endangered *Pending final listing following the 12-month finding published in the Federal Register, October 2, 2013. Additionally, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is addressing petitions to federally list two aquatic species known to occur on or immediately adjacent to Nantahala and Pisgah NFs: eastern hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis), a large aquatic salamander, and sicklefin redhorse (Moxostoma species 2), a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Listed Species Information Presented in This Draft Report Is Considered Under Development. It May Be Incomplete and Is
    DRAFT DRAFT SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 Federally Listed Species Information presented in this draft report is considered under development. It may be incomplete and is likely unedited. This may make some sections difficult to follow. An updated version if this report will be posted when it becomes available. ANIMALS Ten federally-endangered (E) or threatened (T) wildlife species are known to occur on or immediately adjacent to the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests (hereafter, the Forest). These include four small mammals, two terrestrial invertebrates, three freshwater mussels, and one fish (Table 1). Additionally, two endangered species historically occurred on or adjacent to the Forest, but are considered extirpated from North Carolina and are no longer tracked by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (Table 1). Table 1. Federally-listed wildlife species known to occur or historically occurring on or immediately adjacent to the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Small Mammals Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered gray myotis Myotis grisescens Endangered Virginia big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus Endangered Indiana bat Myotis sodalis Endangered Terrestrial Invertebrates spruce-fir moss spider Microhexura montivaga Endangered noonday globe Patera clarki Nantahala Threatened Freshwater Mussels Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana Endangered little-wing pearlymussel Pegius fabula Endangered Cumberland bean Villosa trabilis Endangered
    [Show full text]
  • Alasmidonta Varicosa) Version 1.1.1
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Brook Floater (Alasmidonta varicosa) Version 1.1.1 Molunkus Stream, Tributary of the Mattawamkeag River in Maine. Photo credit: Ethan Nedeau, Biodrawversity. Inset: Adult brook floaters. Photo credit: Jason Mays, USFWS. July 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service This document was prepared by Sandra Doran of the New York Ecological Services Field Office with assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Brook Floater Species Status Assessment (SSA) Team. The team members include Colleen Fahey, Project Manager (Species Assessment Team (SAT), Headquarters (HQ) and Rebecca Migala, Assistant Project Manager, (Region 1, Regional Office), Krishna Gifford (Region 5, Regional Office), Susan (Amanda) Bossie (Region 5 Solicitor's Office, Julie Devers (Region 5, Maryland Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Jason Mays (Region 4, Asheville Field Office), Rachel Mair (Region 5, Harrison Lake National Fish Hatchery), Robert Anderson and Brian Scofield (Region 5, Pennsylvania Field Office), Morgan Wolf (Region 4, Charleston, SC), Lindsay Stevenson (Region 5, Regional Office), Nicole Rankin (Region 4, Regional Office) and Sarah McRae (Region 4, Raleigh, NC Field Office). We also received assistance from David Smith of the U.S. Geological Survey, who served as our SSA Coach. Finally, we greatly appreciate our partners from Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada, the Brook Floater Working Group, and others working on brook floater conservation. Version 1.0 (June 2018) of this report was available for selected peer and partner review and comment. Version 1.1 incorporated comments received on V 1.0 and was used for the Recommendation Team meeting. This final version, (1.1.1), incorporates additional comments in addition to other minor editorial changes including clarifications.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Freshwater Bivalve Species of North Carolina
    List of the Freshwater Bivalve species of North Carolina - printed 2021-09-24 This is a listing of the bivalve mollusk species that have been documented or reported to occur in the freshwater systems of the state. Because bivalves can be very difficult to identify to genus and to species, and because there are a number of historical (often over 100 years ago) and poorly documented reports of many species, it is impossible to state the number of freshwater bivalve species that have been documented in the state. The scientific and common names used in this list are from Williams et al. (2017) for the taxa in the family Unionidae, and from NatureServe Explorer for the taxa in Corbiculidae and Sphaeriidae. The list also includes the State Rank, Global Rank, State Status, and U.S. Status (if it has such statuses) for each species. The ranks are those of the Biotics database of the N. C. Natural Heritage Program and NatureServe, October 2016. Ranks in parentheses are provided by the N.C. Biodiversity Project, based on data in Williams et al. (2017). Status information is given on Page 3. Unionidae: Freshwater Mussels [48] [Rank: State Global] [Status: State US] Range (by river basins) 1 Alasmidonta heterodon ................ Dwarf Wedgemussel ................... [S1 G1G2] [E E] NS, TP 2 Alasmidonta raveneliana .............. Appalachian Elktoe ...................... [S1 G1] [E E] FB, LT 3 Alasmidonta undulata ................... Triangle Floater ........................... [S3 G4] [T] CF, CH, NS, RO, TP, YP 4 Alasmidonta varicosa ................... Brook Floater ............................... [S2 G3] [E] CA, CF, NS, YP 5 Alasmidonta viridis ....................... Slippershell Mussel ..................... [S1 G4G5] [E] FB, LT 6 Cyclonaias tuberculata ................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Mussel Populations Following Hurricane Disturbance Events
    AN ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED RARE MUSSEL POPULATIONS IN WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA FOLLOWING EXTRAORDINARY FLOODS OF SEPTEMBER 2004 Stephen J. Fraley and Jeffrey W. Simmons Aquatic Non-game Biologists Western Region Submitted as completion of NCDENR Contract No. EW06008 June 2006 Table of Contents SUMMARY iii I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. FLOOD MAGNITUDE 2 III. METHODS 3 A. Study Area 3 B. Field Surveys 7 C. Data Reporting and Analysis 8 IV. RESULTS 8 A. Mussel Distribution and Abundance 8 B. Habitat and Other Observations 10 V. DISCUSSION 12 A. Data Comparability and Utility of Results 12 B. Effects of Floods on Mussel Populations 14 C. Conservation and Management Implications 19 VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 21 APPENDIX 1. RAINFALL AND STREAMFLOW, SEPTEMBER 2004 A1-1 APPENDIX 2. SITE CPUE DATA TABLES A2-1 ii SUMMARY High flows, particularly catastrophic floods, are known to affect distribution and abundance of mussels, especially in higher gradient streams. In September 2004, the remnants of hurricanes Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne struck western North Carolina. A number of rare mussel species, including the federal and state endangered Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana) and the federal species of concern and state endangered Brook floater (A. varicosa), occur in the French Broad and upper Catawba river basins where flooding was severe. In 2005, 42 sites were surveyed in these river basins to assess the post-flood distribution and abundance of mussel populations. Twenty three of these sites were surveyed recently prior to the 2004 floods and results (catch per unit effort=CPUE) are compared. No mussel species was completely eliminated from any stream, but we failed to detect Appalachian elktoe in the Cane and South Toe rivers (French Broad basin), and Brook floater in the Johns River (Catawba basin), at sites that represented the upstream limit of their distribution prior to flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE of Engineers Wilmington District
    US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE Of Engineers Wilmington District Issue Date: April 23, 2020 Comment Deadline: May 26, 2020 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2018-00986 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) regarding a potential future requirement for Department of the Army (DA) authorization to discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States associated with the proposed Wilson Road Improvement TIP No. R5763, in Brevard, Transylvania County, North Carolina. Specific alignment alternatives and location information are described below and shown on the attached maps. This Public Notice and attachments are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Project Development and Environmental Analysis Attn: Mr. Barry Mosteller. 253 Webster Road Sylva, North Carolina 28779 Authority The Corps will evaluate this application to compare alternatives that have been carried forward for detailed study pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). In order to more fully integrate Section 10 and Section 404 permit requirements with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and to give careful consideration to our required public interest review and 404(b)(1) compliance determination, the Corps is soliciting public comment on the merits of this proposal and on the alternatives. At the close of this comment period, the District Commander will evaluate and consider the comments received, as well as the expected adverse and beneficial effects of the proposed road construction, to select the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative (LEDPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 – Natural Resources 133
    Chapter 15 Natural Resources 15.1 Ecological Significance of the French Broad River Basin The French Broad River basin once had one of the most diverse aquatic faunas in the state; now it is one of the most heavily altered basins in western North Carolina. Flat, low elevation areas such as floodplains and other wetlands have been especially affected. Because of these impacts, many aquatic animals are no longer found in the basin, including several freshwater mussels, such as the oyster mussel, Cumberland mocassinshell, and purple lilliput. Fish likely to be absent from the basin include longhead darter, wounded darter, and spotfin chub. In addition to fish thought to be extirpated, many species of fish have not been seen in more than 20 years, including river carpsucker, lake sturgeon, blueside darter, longear sunfish, mountain madtom, and dusky darter. Despite these impacts, many of the aquatic and wetland communities of the French Broad River basin are nationally significant and a number of significant remnants persist. 15.2 Rare Aquatic and Wetland-Dwelling Animal Species For information on any of the species listed in Table 26, visit the NC Natural Heritage Program website at www.ncnhp.org. Table 26 List of Rare Animals Associated with Aquatic and Wetland Habitats in the French Broad River Basin (September 2003) Scientific Common Major State Federal Name Name Group Status Status Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Hellbender Amphibian SC FSC Necturus maculosus Common mudpuppy Amphibian SC Stygobromus carolinensis Yancey sideswimmer Crustacean
    [Show full text]
  • ESTIMATING POPULATION DISTRIBUTION and ABUDANCE USING OCCUPANCY and DETECTION MODELS a Thesis by CHANTELLE LEIGH RONDEL Submitt
    ESTIMATING POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AND ABUDANCE USING OCCUPANCY AND DETECTION MODELS A Thesis by CHANTELLE LEIGH RONDEL Submitted to the Graduate School at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2019 Department of Biology ESTIMATING APPALACHIAN ELKTOE DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE USING OCCUPANCY AND DETECTION MODELS A Thesis by CHANTELLE LEIGH RONDEL August 2019 APPROVED BY: Michael M. Gangloff, Ph.D. Chairperson, Thesis Committee Zachary J. Farris, Ph.D. Member, Thesis Committee Lynn M. Siefferman, Ph.D. Member, Thesis Committee Zack E. Murrell, Ph.D. Chairperson, Department of Biology Mike J. McKenzie, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies Copyright by Chantelle Leigh Rondel 2019 All Rights Reserved Abstract ESTIMATING APPALACHIAN ELKTOE DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE USING OCCUPANCY AND DETECTION MODELS Chantelle Leigh Rondel B.S., Western Carolina University M.S., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Michael M. Gangloff, Ph.D. Understanding the factors influencing the abundance, density, occupancy and detectability of endangered species is a critical component of managing at-risk species. However, to date few studies have attempted to incorporate detectability into estimates of endangered freshwater mussel population size or occupancy. The Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana) is an endangered freshwater mussel endemic to the upper Tennessee River Drainage. I studied an Appalachian elktoe population in the South Toe River in Yancey County, North Carolina and used a 3-pass mark-recapture study to model mussel detectability and occupancy at long-term monitoring sites. I used models that accounted for imperfect detection and allowed me to estimate capture, recapture, occupancy, and detection probability while incorporating habitat, mussel behavior, and sampling covariates.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Ecologically Significant Habitats
    Chapter 8 Ecologically Significant Habitats The French Broad River basin once had one of the most diverse assemblies of aquatic fauna in the state; now it is one of the most heavily altered basins in western North Carolina. Flat, low elevation areas such as flood- plains and wetlands have been especially affected. Despite changes in the basin due to the conversion of forest and agricultural lands to residential and commercial development, many aquatic and wetland communities in the basin are Nationally or State significant and continue to support a diversity of species. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program The Natural Heritage Program (NHP) is a part of the Office of Conservation, Planning, and CommunityAffairs. The Program inventories, catalogues, and supports conservation of the rarest and the most outstanding elements of the natural diversity of our State. These elements of natural diversity include those plants and animals which are so rare or the natural communities are so significant that they merit special consideration as land-use deci- sions are made. NHP follows methodology developed by The Nature Conservancy and shared by the Natural Heritage Network and NatureServe. By consolidating information about hundreds of rare species and natural communities, NHP is able to ensure that the public can access information that is needed, to weigh the ecological significance of various sites and to evaluate the likelihood and nature of ecological impacts. This information supports in- formed evaluations of the trade-offs associated with biological diversity and development projects before plans are finalized. Finally, this information facilitates the establishment of priorities for the protection of North Carolina’s most significant natural areas.
    [Show full text]