2013 Playoffs Bracket

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

..:: Leaguestat ::.. Page 1 of 1 Home Schedule/Scores Standings Statistics Team Rosters Playoff Brackets | Expanded Brackets | Playoff Tracker 2013 Playoffs Bracket Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Northern Conference Semi-Finals NIPA (2) vs FLFL (4) • 11. FLFL (4) at NIPA (3) • 12. FLFL (4) at NIPA (5) OT1 • 13. NIPA (2) at FLFL (7) • 14. NIPA (4) at FLFL (3) • 15. FLFL (7) at NIPA (1) • 16. NIPA (0) at FLFL (4) Sherwood Conference Northern Conference Semi-Finals Finals Northern Conference Survivor Series MELV (4) vs NDHD (3) FLFL (1) vs HMBT (4) • 18. NDHD (4) at • 39. FLFL (3) at MELV (2) HMBT (4) OT2 BATT (0) vs MELF (3) • 19. MELV (4) at • 40. FLFL (1) at NDHD (3) HMBT (2) Canalta Cup Final • 1. MELF (4) at • 20. NDHD (2) at • 41. HMBT (0) at BATT (1) MELV (3) OT1 FLFL (4) • 2. BATT (4) at • 21. MELV (1) at • 42. HMBT (2) at MELF (7) NDHD (2) OT1 FLFL (1) OT1 YKTN (4) vs HMBT (2) • 3. MELF (4) at • 22. NDHD (3) at • 43. FLFL (1) at BATT (3) MELV (2) HMBT (2) OT2 • 53. YKTN (2) at Champions • 23. MELV (2) at HMBT (3) OT1 NDHD (1) OT2 • 54. HMBT (2) at Sherwood Conference • 24. NDHD (2) at Sherwood Conference YKTN (3) Survivor Series MELV (5) Finals • 55. YKTN (2) at HMBT (3) • 56. HMBT (1) at Northern Conference YKTN (4) Semi-Finals KK (1) vs ESTV (3) YKTN (4) vs MELV (2) • 57. YKTN (2) at HMBT (1) OT3 • 6. ESTV (2) at KK • 46. MELV (1) at • 58. HMBT (3) at (1) YKTN (3) YKTN (4) • 7. ESTV (5) at KK MELF (1) vs HMBT (4) • 47. YKTN (3) at (4) MELV (1) • 8. KK (3) at ESTV • 25. MELF (3) at • 48. MELV (3) at (1) HMBT (2) OT1 YKTN (1) • 9. KK (1) at ESTV • 26. HMBT (4) at • 49. YKTN (0) at (4) MELF (2) MELV (3) • 27. MELF (1) at • 50. MELV (2) at HMBT (7) YKTN (3) • 28. HMBT (5) at • 51. YKTN (5) at MELF (3) MELV (1) • 29. MELF (2) at HMBT (5) Sherwood Conference Semi-Finals ESTV (1) vs YKTN (4) • 32. ESTV (1) at YKTN (6) • 33. YKTN (2) at ESTV (5) • 34. ESTV (1) at YKTN (2) • 35. YKTN (2) at ESTV (1) • 36. ESTV (3) at YKTN (6) (* if necessary) © 2012 Commercial Design and Multimedia. All rights reserved. LeagueStat.com is a NewSportMedia Product. NewSportMedia is a division of Commercial Design & Multimedia. www.leaguestat.com is published by Commercial Design and Multimedia. All content contained in this web site is copyright of Commercial Design and Multimedia or it's clients. No part of this material may be copied or reproduced without the prior written consent of Commercial Design and Multimedia. http://www.leaguestat.com/sjhl/sjhl/en/stats/bracket.php?season_id=13 4/ 20/ 2015.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Hunger Games: an Indictment of Reality Television
The Hunger Games: An Indictment of Reality Television An ELA Performance Task The Hunger Games and Reality Television Introductory Classroom Activity (30 minutes) Have students sit in small groups of about 4-5 people. Each group should have someone to record their discussion and someone who will report out orally for the group. Present on a projector the video clip drawing comparisons between The Hunger Games and shows currently on Reality TV: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdmOwt77D2g) After watching the video clip, ask each group recorder to create two columns on a piece of paper. In one column, the group will list recent or current reality television shows that have similarities to the way reality television is portrayed in The Hunger Games. In the second column, list or explain some of those similarities. To clarify this assignment, ask the following two questions: 1. What are the rules that have been set up for The Hunger Games, particularly those that are intended to appeal to the television audience? 2. Are there any shows currently or recently on television that use similar rules or elements to draw a larger audience? Allow about 5 to 10 minutes for students to work in their small groups to complete their lists. Have students report out on their group work, starting with question #1. Repeat the report out process with question #2. Discuss as a large group the following questions: 1. The narrator in the video clip suggests that entertainments like The Hunger Games “desensitize us” to violence. How true do you think this is? 2.
[Show full text]
2020 WWE Finest
BASE BASE CARDS 1 Angel Garza Raw® 2 Akam Raw® 3 Aleister Black Raw® 4 Andrade Raw® 5 Angelo Dawkins Raw® 6 Asuka Raw® 7 Austin Theory Raw® 8 Becky Lynch Raw® 9 Bianca Belair Raw® 10 Bobby Lashley Raw® 11 Murphy Raw® 12 Charlotte Flair Raw® 13 Drew McIntyre Raw® 14 Edge Raw® 15 Erik Raw® 16 Humberto Carrillo Raw® 17 Ivar Raw® 18 Kairi Sane Raw® 19 Kevin Owens Raw® 20 Lana Raw® 21 Liv Morgan Raw® 22 Montez Ford Raw® 23 Nia Jax Raw® 24 R-Truth Raw® 25 Randy Orton Raw® 26 Rezar Raw® 27 Ricochet Raw® 28 Riddick Moss Raw® 29 Ruby Riott Raw® 30 Samoa Joe Raw® 31 Seth Rollins Raw® 32 Shayna Baszler Raw® 33 Zelina Vega Raw® 34 AJ Styles SmackDown® 35 Alexa Bliss SmackDown® 36 Bayley SmackDown® 37 Big E SmackDown® 38 Braun Strowman SmackDown® 39 "The Fiend" Bray Wyatt SmackDown® 40 Carmella SmackDown® 41 Cesaro SmackDown® 42 Daniel Bryan SmackDown® 43 Dolph Ziggler SmackDown® 44 Elias SmackDown® 45 Jeff Hardy SmackDown® 46 Jey Uso SmackDown® 47 Jimmy Uso SmackDown® 48 John Morrison SmackDown® 49 King Corbin SmackDown® 50 Kofi Kingston SmackDown® 51 Lacey Evans SmackDown® 52 Mandy Rose SmackDown® 53 Matt Riddle SmackDown® 54 Mojo Rawley SmackDown® 55 Mustafa Ali Raw® 56 Naomi SmackDown® 57 Nikki Cross SmackDown® 58 Otis SmackDown® 59 Robert Roode Raw® 60 Roman Reigns SmackDown® 61 Sami Zayn SmackDown® 62 Sasha Banks SmackDown® 63 Sheamus SmackDown® 64 Shinsuke Nakamura SmackDown® 65 Shorty G SmackDown® 66 Sonya Deville SmackDown® 67 Tamina SmackDown® 68 The Miz SmackDown® 69 Tucker SmackDown® 70 Xavier Woods SmackDown® 71 Adam Cole NXT® 72 Bobby
[Show full text]
OAESV Survivor Series Empowerment, Hope & Healing
OAESV Survivor Series Empowerment, Hope & Healing UNDERSTANDING THE TRAUMA OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE Sexual Violence is a Form of Trauma As a survivor of sexual violence, you have endured a trauma, a significant event or series of events that fall outside the range of normal, everyday human experience. All forms of sexual violence are traumatic, including rape, attempted rape, sexual abuse, molestation, voyeurism, and many others. Other familiar types of traumatic events include combat conditions, natural disasters, vehicle accidents, and medical emergencies, or witnessing one or more of these events happening to someone else. What makes a particular experience traumatic is that the survivor’s ability to control what is happening to him or her is stripped away, often violently. The survivor feels that his or her health, safety and even life are directly threatened and he/she is rendered powerless to address that threat in the moment. Such an event overwhelms the brain’s capacity to effectively respond and cope the way you would be able to in other types of situations. The extent to which a particular event is experienced as being traumatic by the survivor depends on many factors, which are unique to each person and each situation. Although you may feel out of sorts, or even that you’re “going crazy,” your reactions are normal responses to an abnormal event. Sexual Violence is Unique While the “brain impact” of sexual violence is similar to that of other types of trauma, sexual violence is unique. Unlike other types of trauma, sexual violence is a deliberate violation of your most personal space by one or more individuals that you likely knew and may have even trusted or loved.
[Show full text]
Survivor Series 2016 Level 3
Survivor Series 2016 Level 3 For Year 5 and Year 6 students. Curriculum level 3. What to do. For students. 1. You can work with a friend or two friends! Teams can be different each day. 2. Do the tasks and enter your answers in your maths book and show your teacher. 3. If you are right you will get the next task. 4. If you are wrong, answer the task again. 5. When you have finished each day you will get a code word. 6. At the end of the week you will have 5 code words. Put them together and this will tell you where your school’s Maths Week treasure is. 7. Good luck ! Wednesday: 2016 Making a Maze. Survivor Series Level 3 For Year 5 and Year 6 students Curriculum Level 3 Mazes are good fun! They are mathematical too!! Try these!!! Start at the top and reach the bottom! Start here and go to the centre. This maze is the famous Hampton Court Maze in England. Start at the top and find you way to the centre. Task Your task is to make a maze! You will need some dotty-square paper. Choose a shape 10 dots by 10 dots. You can make this larger if you wish. Draw an outside fence through the dots. This will become the boundary of your maze. You will need to put two gaps into your outside fence. One gap is for the gate to enter your maze. The other gap is the gate to exit the maze. Draw a path in light pencil from the entrance gate to the exit gate going through the centre of as many dotty-squares as you wish.
[Show full text]
BASE BASE CARDS 1 Asuka 2 Bobby Roode 3 Ember Moon 4 Eric
BASE BASE CARDS 1 Asuka 2 Bobby Roode 3 Ember Moon 4 Eric Young 5 Hideo Itami 6 Johnny Gargano 7 Liv Morgan 8 Tommaso Ciampa 9 The Rock 10 Alicia Fox 11 Austin Aries 12 Bayley 13 Big Cass 14 Big E 15 Bob Backlund 16 The Brian Kendrick 17 Brock Lesnar 18 Cesaro 19 Charlotte Flair 20 Chris Jericho 21 Enzo Amore 22 Finn Bálor 23 Goldberg 24 Karl Anderson 25 Kevin Owens 26 Kofi Kingston 27 Lana 28 Luke Gallows 29 Mick Foley 30 Roman Reigns 31 Rusev 32 Sami Zayn 33 Samoa Joe 34 Sasha Banks 35 Seth Rollins 36 Sheamus 37 Triple H 38 Xavier Woods 39 AJ Styles 40 Alexa Bliss 41 Baron Corbin 42 Becky Lynch 43 Bray Wyatt 44 Carmella 45 Chad Gable 46 Daniel Bryan 47 Dean Ambrose 48 Dolph Ziggler 49 Heath Slater 50 Jason Jordan 51 Jey Uso 52 Jimmy Uso 53 John Cena 54 Kalisto 55 Kane 56 Luke Harper 57 Maryse 58 The Miz 59 Mojo Rawley 60 Naomi 61 Natalya 62 Nikki Bella 63 Randy Orton 64 Rhyno 65 Shinsuke Nakamura 66 Undertaker 67 Zack Ryder 68 Alundra Blayze 69 Andre the Giant 70 Batista 71 Bret "Hit Man" Hart 72 British Bulldog 73 Brutus "The Barber" Beefcake 74 Diamond Dallas Page 75 Dusty Rhodes 76 Edge 77 Fit Finlay 78 Jake "The Snake" Roberts 79 Jim "The Anvil" Neidhart 80 Ken Shamrock 81 Kevin Nash 82 Lex Luger 83 Terri Runnels 84 "Macho Man" Randy Savage 85 "Million Dollar Man" Ted DiBiase 86 Mr. Perfect 87 "Ravishing" Rick Rude 88 Ric Flair 89 Rob Van Dam 90 Ron Simmons 91 Rowdy Roddy Piper 92 Scott Hall 93 Sgt.
[Show full text]
The Full 100+ Page Pdf!
2014 was a unique year for pro-wrestling, one that will undoubtedly be viewed as historically significant in years to follow. Whether it is to be reflected upon positively or negatively is not only highly subjective, but also context-specific with major occurrences transpiring across the pro-wrestling world over the last 12 months, each with its own strong, and at times far reaching, consequences. The WWE launched its much awaited Network, New Japan continued to expand, CMLL booked lucha's biggest match in well over a decade, culminating in the country's first million dollar gate, TNA teetered more precariously on the brink of death than perhaps ever before, Daniel Bryan won the WWE's top prize, Dragon Gate and DDT saw continued success before their loyal niche audiences, Alberto Del Rio and CM Punk departed the WWE with one ending up in the most unexpected of places, a developing and divergent style produced some of the best indie matches of the year, the European scene flourished, the Shield disbanded, Batista returned, Daniel Bryan relinquished his championship, and the Undertaker's streak came to an unexpected and dramatic end. These are but some of the happenings, which made 2014 the year that it was, and it is in this year-book that we look to not only recap all of these events and more, but also contemplate their relevance to the greater pro-wrestling landscape, both for 2015 and beyond. It should be stated that this year-book was inspired by the DKP Annuals that were released in 2011 and 2012, in fact, it was the absence of a 2013 annual that inspired us to produce a year-book for 2014.
[Show full text]
WWE® Reports 2013 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contacts: Investors: Michael Weitz 203-352-8642 Media: Tara Carraro 203-352-8625 WWE® Reports 2013 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results STAMFORD, Conn., February 20, 2014 - WWE (NYSE:WWE) today announced financial results for its fourth quarter ended December 31, 2013. Revenues totaled $118.4 million as compared to $115.1 million in the prior year quarter. Operating loss was $12.2 million as compared to income of $2.6 million in the prior year quarter. Net loss was $7.9 million, or $0.10 per share, as compared to income of $0.6 million, or $0.01 per share, in the prior year quarter. OIBDA in the fourth quarter 2013 decreased to a $5.6 million loss from income of $8.5 million in the prior year quarter. The decline in OIBDA and Operating income was primarily attributable to increased investment in staffing, talent and marketing to support our strategic content initiatives, including the launch of WWE Network. Lower sales of new DVD releases and a corresponding shift in product mix to lower priced catalog titles, as well as compressed television production margins that derived from changes in the mix of programming also contributed to the year-over-year decline. “During the past year, we laid the foundation for future growth and enhanced our brand strength,” stated Vince McMahon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “We have now announced the renewal of our television distribution agreement in the U.K., are continuing the negotiations regarding our domestic content, and are poised to launch our global WWE Network in the next few days.
[Show full text]
WWE® Reports 2014 Results with Q4 Earnings Growth That Exceeds Expectations
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contacts: Investors: Michael Weitz 203-352-8642 Media: Tara Carraro 203-352-8625 WWE® Reports 2014 Results With Q4 Earnings Growth that Exceeds Expectations STAMFORD, Conn., February 12, 2015 - WWE (NYSE:WWE) today announced financial results for its fourth quarter ended December 31, 2014. Revenues for the quarter increased 19% to $140.5 million from $118.4 million in the fourth quarter last year. For the quarter, the Company reported a Net loss of $1.6 million, or $0.02 loss per share, as compared to a Net loss of $7.9 million, or $0.10 loss per share, in the prior year quarter. The revenue increase was driven by the Network and Television segments with earnings growth driven primarily by the rise in television rights fees. Excluding items affecting comparability, Adjusted OIBDA increased to $5.1 million from a loss of $5.6 million and Adjusted Net loss was $0.6 million, or $0.01 loss per share, as compared to a Net loss of $7.9 million, or $0.10 loss per share, in the prior year quarter. “During the quarter, we remained focused on growing WWE Network, which surpassed 1 million subscribers in January 2015, just 11 months after launch. Subscriber growth was driven by a successful free November promotion, the launch of the service in the UK and the strength of our Royal Rumble event,” stated Vince McMahon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “We believe that our 2015 road map provides significant opportunities for growth, as we continue to execute well, innovate faster and expand WWE Network, the single greatest opportunity to transform WWE’s business model.” “In the fourth quarter, we continued to execute our WWE Network strategy, and we generated earnings growth driven by the escalation of our television rights fees.
[Show full text]
2020 WWE Transcendent
BASE ROSTER BASE CARD 1 Adam Cole NXT 2 Andre the Giant WWE Legend 3 Angelo Dawkins WWE 4 Bianca Belair NXT 5 Big Show WWE 6 Bruno Sammartino WWE Legend 7 Cain Velasquez WWE 8 Cameron Grimes WWE 9 Candice LeRae NXT 10 Chyna WWE Legend 11 Damian Priest NXT 12 Dusty Rhodes WWE Legend 13 Eddie Guerrero WWE Legend 14 Harley Race WWE Legend 15 Hulk Hogan WWE Legend 16 Io Shirai NXT 17 Jim "The Anvil" Neidhart WWE Legend 18 John Cena WWE 19 John Morrison WWE 20 Johnny Gargano WWE 21 Keith Lee NXT 22 Kevin Nash WWE Legend 23 Lana WWE 24 Lio Rush WWE 25 "Macho Man" Randy Savage WWE Legend 26 Mandy Rose WWE 27 "Mr. Perfect" Curt Hennig WWE Legend 28 Montez Ford WWE 29 Mustafa Ali WWE 30 Naomi WWE 31 Natalya WWE 32 Nikki Cross WWE 33 Paul Heyman WWE 34 "Ravishing" Rick Rude WWE Legend 35 Renee Young WWE 36 Rhea Ripley NXT 37 Robert Roode WWE 38 Roderick Strong NXT 39 "Rowdy" Roddy Piper WWE Legend 40 Rusev WWE 41 Scott Hall WWE Legend 42 Shorty G WWE 43 Sting WWE Legend 44 Sonya Deville WWE 45 The British Bulldog WWE Legend 46 The Rock WWE Legend 47 Ultimate Warrior WWE Legend 48 Undertaker WWE 49 Vader WWE Legend 50 Yokozuna WWE Legend AUTOGRAPH ROSTER AUTOGRAPHS A-AA Andrade WWE A-AB Aleister Black WWE A-AJ AJ Styles WWE A-AK Asuka WWE A-AX Alexa Bliss WWE A-BC King Corbin WWE A-BD Diesel WWE Legend A-BH Bret "Hit Man" Hart WWE Legend A-BI Brock Lesnar WWE A-BL Becky Lynch WWE A-BR Braun Strowman WWE A-BT Booker T WWE Legend A-BW "The Fiend" Bray Wyatt WWE A-BY Bayley WWE A-CF Charlotte Flair WWE A-CW Sheamus WWE A-DB Daniel Bryan WWE A-DR Drew
[Show full text]
Just Punishment?: the Epistemic and Affective Investments in Carceral Feminism
Just Punishment?: The Epistemic and Affective Investments in Carceral Feminism Tess Joseph Honors Thesis in Comparative American Studies Advisor: Professor Wendy Kozol Readers: Professors KJ Cerankowski and Gina Perez April 19, 2019 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 4 Contextualizing the Carceral State: An Epistemic and Affective Occupation 7 Questioning Carceral Feminism 12 Chapter 1: Mapping the Origins of Carceral Feminism 15 The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 23 Chapter 2: RAINN’s Website: The Epistemic and Affective Justification of Punishment 28 Funding and Mission Statement 30 Programs and Infographics: Fearing Perpetrators, Urging Punishment 33 Public Policy: “Lawmakers Making a Difference” 38 Chapter 3: Survivor Confessionals and the Limits of Healing 42 The Speakers Bureau Application 43 Survivor Series 46 Figuring Affect. 49 Overview. 53 Justice. 55 Healing. 58 Disclosure. 60 RAINN. 62 Conclusion: De-Linking Toward Possible Freedom 65 Bibliography 71 3 Acknowledgements The thesis you are about to read would not have been possible without the help of many. First, thank you to my academic mentors, notably my advisor, Professor Wendy Kozol, and my readers, Professors KJ Cerankowski and Gina Perez. I could not have completed this project without their consistent encouragement, critical questions, and direction throughout the research and writing process. Moreover, I am ever grateful for my fellow Honors students, Ruby Jane Anderson and Katie Wilson, and the members of the Fall 2018 seminar, Sophie Jones and Joey Flegel-Mishlove. Their feedback and camaraderie carried me through this past year. Finally, a special thank you to my family and friends who motivated me, served as sounding boards, and offered me guidance along the way.
[Show full text]
2013 Playoffs
Table Of Contents Table Of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 1 LeagueStat.com Daily Report for the SJHL ....................................................................................... 2 Playoff Brackets ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Attendance Report ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Conference Standings ................................................................................................................................................ 5 League Standings ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Overall Leaders .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Goaltending Leaders .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Rookie Leaders ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Defenseman Leaders ..............................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Longevity in Reality Television: How Survivor Outwits, Outlasts and Outplays
Longevity in Reality Television: How Survivor Outwits, Outlasts and Outplays Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Harrison, Natasha Alexandra Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 20:18:57 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/312070 LONGEVITY IN REALITY TELEVISION: HOW SURVIVOR OUTWITS, OUTLASTS AND OUTPLAYS By NATASHA ALEXANDRA HARRISON ____________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors of Arts degree With Honors in Media Arts – Producing THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA DECEMBER 2013 Approved by: ____________________ Dr. Bradley Schauer School of Theatre, Film and Television Abstract The reality television show, Survivor, has been broadcasted on CBS since May 2000. This paper outlines the various ways Survivor has been able to outwit, outlast, and outplay for twenty-seven seasons. This award-winning American reality competition show tests the physical, mental, emotional, and social limits of anyone who is willing to be “stranded” on a deserted island in order to have the chance to win $1,000,000. As contestants try to adapt to their new island lifestyle, producers try to adapt new ways to keep the audience engaged from season to season. This paper gives readers a detailed history of how the show came to be as well as prediction as to where the show will and will not go in the future.
[Show full text]