DOCSLIB.ORG

Digital's Vaxstation 4000 Family Performance Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Digital's Vaxstation 4000 Family Performance Summary Digital’s VAXstation 4000 Family Performance Summary Version 2.0 March 1992 Order Number: EC-N0626-51 Digital Equipment Corporation Maynard MA TM ________________________________________________________________________________________________ First Printing, March 1992 The information in this document is subject to change without notice and should not be construed as a com- mitment by Digital Equipment Corporation. Digital Equipment Corporation assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear in this document. Any software described in this document is furnished under a license and may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of such license. No responsibility is assumed for the use or reliability of software or equipment that is not supplied by Digital Equipment Corporation or its affiliated companies. Restricted Rights: Use, duplication, or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 252.227 7013. Copyright ©1991 Digital Equipment Corporation All right reserved. Printed in U.S.A. The following are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation: DEC, DECsystem, DECwrite , the DIGI- TAL Logo, ULTRIX, VAX, VAXstation 3100, VMS The following are third-party trademarks: dBASE IV is a registered trademark of Ashton-Tate Corporation. HP is a trademark of Hewlett-Packard Company. IBM is a trademark of International Business Machines Corporation. Lotus and 1-2-3 are registered trademarks of the Lotus Development Corporation. SPEC is a trademark of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. SPARCserver is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Incorporated. Sun is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Incorporated. UNIX is a registered trademark of UNIX System Laboratories, Inc. WordPerfect is a registered trademark of the WordPerfect Corporation. X11 is a trademark of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This document was prepared using DECwrite, Version 2.0 Contents Part I Executive Summary................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 2 New Product Highlights ....................................................................................................... 6 3 New Product Descriptions ................................................................................................... 7 4 Summary of Relative Performance and System Attributes ................................................. 8 Part II Benchmark Results ............................................................................................... 13 3D Graphics Benchmarks .................................................................................................. 15 4.1 Background ................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Results and Conclusions ................................................................................................ 15 Picture-Level Benchmarks ................................................................................................. 18 4.3 Background .................................................................................................................... 18 4.4 Results and Conclusions ................................................................................................ 19 2D Graphics X11perf Benchmarks ................................................................................. 21 4.5 X11perf Benchmark Results ........................................................................................... 21 SoftPC for VMS ....................................................................................................................... 23 4.6 SoftPC Benchmark Results ............................................................................................ 23 The SPEC Benchmark Suite .............................................................................................. 24 4.7 SPEC Results .................................................................................................................24 Dhrystone Integer Benchmark ......................................................................................... 27 4.8 Dhrystone Results .......................................................................................................... 27 Linpack Benchmark .............................................................................................................. 30 4.9 Linpack Results ..............................................................................................................30 Whetstone Benchmark ........................................................................................................ 32 4.10 Whetstone Results ......................................................................................................... 32 A Test Configurations ......................................................................................................... A-1 iii B References .......................................................................................................................... B-1 Figures Figure 4-1: 3D Graphics Kvectors/second Results................................................................. 16 Figure 4-2: 3D Graphics Kpolygons/second Results .............................................................. 17 Figure 4-3: PLB Benchmarks Results .................................................................................... 20 Figure 4-4: X11perf 2D Kvectors/second Benchmark Results ............................................... 22 Figure 4-5: X11perf Mpixels/second Benchmark Results....................................................... 22 Figure 4-6: SPECmark Ratings .............................................................................................. 24 Figure 4-7: SPECint Ratings ..................................................................................................25 Figure 4-8: SPECfp Ratings ...................................................................................................25 Figure 4-9: Dhrystones MIPS Ratings .................................................................................... 28 Figure 4-10: Dhrystones/second Benchmark Results .............................................................. 29 Figure 4-11: Linpack Single Precision MFLOPS Ratings ........................................................ 30 Figure 4-12: Linpack Double Precision MFLOPS Ratings........................................................ 31 Figure 4-13: Whetstone Single Precision KWIPS Ratings ....................................................... 32 Figure 4-14: Whetstone Double Precision KWIPS Ratings ...................................................... 33 Tables Table 3-1: VAXstation 4000 VLC and VAXstation 4000 Model 60 System Features.............. 7 Table 4-1: Digital VAXstations and Competitive Systems Graphics & SoftPC Benchmark Results ................................................................................................................... 9 Table 4-2: Digital VAXstations and Competitive Systems CPU and Floating Point Benchmark Results ................................................................................................................. 10 Table 4-3: Digital VAXstations and Competitive Systems PLB Results ................................ 11 Table 4-4: Key to Graphs ......................................................................................................14 Table 4-5: Comparison of SoftPC Software Benchmarking ................................................. 23 Table 4-6: SPEC Ratios for VAXstations .............................................................................. 26 Table 4-7: SPEC Ratios for RISC-based Systems................................................................ 26 iv Part I Executive Summary 1 Introduction This revision of Digital’s VAXstation 4000 Family Performance Summary intro- duces the SPXg and SPXgt, the new generation of graphics accelerators for the VAXstation 4000 Model 60. The SPXg and SPXgt provide high-resolution (1280 x 1024) 3D capability for the VAXstation 4000 Model 60. The 8-plane SPXg is intended for design automation (CAD/CAE/CAM), molecular modeling, architectural design, and true-color imaging applications. The SPXg op- tion provides support for full double buffering and 16-bit Z buffering. The higher performance 24-plane SPXgt is designed for 3D modeling and visualization applica- tions. Again, full double buffering is supported along with 24-bit Z buffering. Both the SPXg and SPXgt contain hardware acceleration to support major industry stan- dard graphics protocols including PHIGS (Programmers Hierarchical Interactive Graphical System) and GKS (Graphics Kernel System). PEX support provides the PHIGS link to the X Window System. Digital’s VAXstation 4000 Family Performance Summary is a technical reference document for Digital sales support personnel, customers, and other individuals who need to understand the performance characteristics of the VAXstation family. This document provides information about the workstation and the system-level per- formance of the VAXstation family running standard industry benchmarks and workloads. The metrics for recording system performance vary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Validated Products List, 1995 No. 3: Programming Languages, Database
    NISTIR 5693 (Supersedes NISTIR 5629) VALIDATED PRODUCTS LIST Volume 1 1995 No. 3 Programming Languages Database Language SQL Graphics POSIX Computer Security Judy B. Kailey Product Data - IGES Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1995 QC 100 NIST .056 NO. 5693 1995 NISTIR 5693 (Supersedes NISTIR 5629) VALIDATED PRODUCTS LIST Volume 1 1995 No. 3 Programming Languages Database Language SQL Graphics POSIX Computer Security Judy B. Kailey Product Data - IGES Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1995 (Supersedes April 1995 issue) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Ronald H. Brown, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Mary L. Good, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arati Prabhakar, Director FOREWORD The Validated Products List (VPL) identifies information technology products that have been tested for conformance to Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) in accordance with Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL) conformance testing procedures, and have a current validation certificate or registered test report. The VPL also contains information about the organizations, test methods and procedures that support the validation programs for the FIPS identified in this document. The VPL includes computer language processors for programming languages COBOL, Fortran, Ada, Pascal, C, M[UMPS], and database language SQL; computer graphic implementations for GKS, COM, PHIGS, and Raster Graphics; operating system implementations for POSIX; Open Systems Interconnection implementations; and computer security implementations for DES, MAC and Key Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Sun Ultratm 5 Workstation Just the Facts
    Sun UltraTM 5 Workstation Just the Facts Copyrights 1999 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, Ultra, PGX, PGX24, Solaris, Sun Enterprise, SunClient, UltraComputing, Catalyst, SunPCi, OpenWindows, PGX32, VIS, Java, JDK, XGL, XIL, Java 3D, SunVTS, ShowMe, ShowMe TV, SunForum, Java WorkShop, Java Studio, AnswerBook, AnswerBook2, Sun Enterprise SyMON, Solstice, Solstice AutoClient, ShowMe How, SunCD, SunCD 2Plus, Sun StorEdge, SunButtons, SunDials, SunMicrophone, SunFDDI, SunLink, SunHSI, SunATM, SLC, ELC, IPC, IPX, SunSpectrum, JavaStation, SunSpectrum Platinum, SunSpectrum Gold, SunSpectrum Silver, SunSpectrum Bronze, SunVIP, SunSolve, and SunSolve EarlyNotifier are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. OpenGL is a registered trademark of Silicon Graphics, Inc. Display PostScript and PostScript are trademarks of Adobe Systems, Incorporated, which may be registered in certain jurisdictions. Netscape is a trademark of Netscape Communications Corporation. DLT is claimed as a trademark of Quantum Corporation in the United States and other countries. Just the Facts May 1999 Positioning The Sun UltraTM 5 Workstation Figure 1. The Ultra 5 workstation The Sun UltraTM 5 workstation is an entry-level workstation based upon the 333- and 360-MHz UltraSPARCTM-IIi processors. The Ultra 5 is Sun’s lowest-priced workstation, designed to meet the needs of price-sensitive and volume-purchase customers in the personal workstation market without sacrificing performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbenchmarks in Big Data
    M Microbenchmark Overview Microbenchmarks constitute the first line of per- Nicolas Poggi formance testing. Through them, we can ensure Databricks Inc., Amsterdam, NL, BarcelonaTech the proper and timely functioning of the different (UPC), Barcelona, Spain individual components that make up our system. The term micro, of course, depends on the prob- lem size. In BigData we broaden the concept Synonyms to cover the testing of large-scale distributed systems and computing frameworks. This chap- Component benchmark; Functional benchmark; ter presents the historical background, evolution, Test central ideas, and current key applications of the field concerning BigData. Definition Historical Background A microbenchmark is either a program or routine to measure and test the performance of a single Origins and CPU-Oriented Benchmarks component or task. Microbenchmarks are used to Microbenchmarks are closer to both hardware measure simple and well-defined quantities such and software testing than to competitive bench- as elapsed time, rate of operations, bandwidth, marking, opposed to application-level – macro or latency. Typically, microbenchmarks were as- – benchmarking. For this reason, we can trace sociated with the testing of individual software microbenchmarking influence to the hardware subroutines or lower-level hardware components testing discipline as can be found in Sumne such as the CPU and for a short period of time. (1974). Furthermore, we can also find influence However, in the BigData scope, the term mi- in the origins of software testing methodology crobenchmarking is broadened to include the during the 1970s, including works such cluster – group of networked computers – acting as Chow (1978). One of the first examples of as a single system, as well as the testing of a microbenchmark clearly distinguishable from frameworks, algorithms, logical and distributed software testing is the Whetstone benchmark components, for a longer period and larger data developed during the late 1960s and published sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the SPEC Benchmarks
    9 Overview of the SPEC Benchmarks Kaivalya M. Dixit IBM Corporation “The reputation of current benchmarketing claims regarding system performance is on par with the promises made by politicians during elections.” Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) was founded in October, 1988, by Apollo, Hewlett-Packard,MIPS Computer Systems and SUN Microsystems in cooperation with E. E. Times. SPEC is a nonprofit consortium of 22 major computer vendors whose common goals are “to provide the industry with a realistic yardstick to measure the performance of advanced computer systems” and to educate consumers about the performance of vendors’ products. SPEC creates, maintains, distributes, and endorses a standardized set of application-oriented programs to be used as benchmarks. 489 490 CHAPTER 9 Overview of the SPEC Benchmarks 9.1 Historical Perspective Traditional benchmarks have failed to characterize the system performance of modern computer systems. Some of those benchmarks measure component-level performance, and some of the measurements are routinely published as system performance. Historically, vendors have characterized the performances of their systems in a variety of confusing metrics. In part, the confusion is due to a lack of credible performance information, agreement, and leadership among competing vendors. Many vendors characterize system performance in millions of instructions per second (MIPS) and millions of floating-point operations per second (MFLOPS). All instructions, however, are not equal. Since CISC machine instructions usually accomplish a lot more than those of RISC machines, comparing the instructions of a CISC machine and a RISC machine is similar to comparing Latin and Greek. 9.1.1 Simple CPU Benchmarks Truth in benchmarking is an oxymoron because vendors use benchmarks for marketing purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • System Administration
    System Administration Varian NMR Spectrometer Systems With VNMR 6.1C Software Pub. No. 01-999166-00, Rev. C0503 System Administration Varian NMR Spectrometer Systems With VNMR 6.1C Software Pub. No. 01-999166-00, Rev. C0503 Revision history: A0800 – Initial release for VNMR 6.1C A1001 – Corrected errors on pg 120, general edit B0202 – Updated AutoTest B0602 – Added additional Autotest sections including VNMRJ update B1002 – Updated Solaris patch information and revised section 21.7, Autotest C0503 – Add additional Autotest sections including cryogenic probes Applicability: Varian NMR spectrometer systems with Sun workstations running Solaris 2.x and VNMR 6.1C software By Rolf Kyburz ([email protected]) Varian International AG, Zug, Switzerland, and Gerald Simon ([email protected]) Varian GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany Additional contributions by Frits Vosman, Dan Iverson, Evan Williams, George Gray, Steve Cheatham Technical writer: Mike Miller Technical editor: Dan Steele Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 by Varian, Inc., NMR Systems 3120 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California 94304 1-800-356-4437 http://www.varianinc.com All rights reserved. Printed in the United States. The information in this document has been carefully checked and is believed to be entirely reliable. However, no responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies. Statements in this document are not intended to create any warranty, expressed or implied. Specifications and performance characteristics of the software described in this manual may be changed at any time without notice. Varian reserves the right to make changes in any products herein to improve reliability, function, or design. Varian does not assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit described herein; neither does it convey any license under its patent rights nor the rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 CSE Implementation Issues
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Studies in Interactive Visualization van Liere, R. Publication date 2001 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van Liere, R. (2001). Studies in Interactive Visualization. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 Chapter 3 CSE Implementation Issues An overview of the CSE architecture was presented in Chapter 2. In this chapter a more in-depth discussion on the technical issues related to the design and implementation is given. 3.1 Design 3.1.1 Data Storage and Mappings A variable managed by the blackboard consists of a name, type, value, dimensions, and user defined attributes. Data is stored in the blackboard as an n-dimensional array (where n is0, 1, 2,...) containing elements of the same scalar type (e.g., 8-bit character, 32-bit integer).
    [Show full text]
  • VAX 4000 V96-2.3—10 Feb 1997
    TM VAX 4000 V96-2.3—10 Feb 1997 DIGITAL Systems and Options Catalog Product Description VAX 4000 systems provide commercial systems performance, high availability, and a compact footprint. They support a wide range of applications and options, including FDDI networks and Q-bus peripherals. System enclosure supports internal storage and Q-bus expansion through a B400X expansion cabinet. VAX 4000 systems come in three packages: Desktop Model 106A, Desktop/Deskside Model 108, and Pedestal/Deskside Model 505A/705A DSSI and Ethernet adapter chips—each driven by a 10-MIP on-chip RISC processor—are tightly integrated on the CPU module with direct access to memory. Digital's DSSI to SCSI HSD10 storage solutions replace DSSI RF36 disk technology in all VAX 4000 systems. Digital’s HSD10 DSSI-to-SCSI controller. mounted internally in system cabinet, supports standard RZxx SCSI storage on VAX 4000 systems while still supporting DSSI clustering. External StorageWorks HSD10 controllers are supported. VAX 4000 Model 106A offers performance of 10-ns NVAX chip. Systems achieve 215 transactions per second (TPS). With internal support for the HSD10, DSSI-to-SCSI controller, VAX 4000 customers can take advantage of low-cost, more flexible and open StorageWorks solutions. VAX 4000 Model 108 offers identical performance, is compatible with Model 106A, but is housed in a new Desktop/Deskside minitower enclosure. In addition, these systems offer enchancements in the memory and storage capacity, supporting up to 512 MB of standard SIMM memory and six storage devices in the system enclosure. VAX 4000 Model 505A and 705A offer 12 ns and 9 ns performance, respectively in a Q-bus Pedestal package.
    [Show full text]
  • I Txso C~T Dc~ 5 SPD / LETTER FC~R
    i DIGITAL Digital Equipm~t3t Corporation SOFTW~►,RE Digital Drive SILL OF MATERIALS Westminster, Massachusetts 01473-0471 Option Number Option Title Date Page ~ QA-10 OAA-W55.6 ~rAX FORTF~? V5.6 UPD TK5 0 28-Feb-91 1 of 1 ~TY PICK LOCATION PART NLJL~ER PART DESCRIPTION .~_ -.. 1 *FS* 36-28231-07 TRE~I~ZA~L S~~RCODE LABEL 1 *FS* 99-08545-02 BOOKT~IRAP 1 t UR) AQ-FP 8 6N-BN ~irAX FORTP~AN V5.6 BIN TK5 0 1 ~ DP ~ AV-PF4FA-TK SUP REPLACEMENT LETTER 1 EN-01044-07 SFT'WR PERFOF~!~ANCE REPORT FORM 1 ***** NS ~~~ QA-10 OAA-WZ 5.6 ~irAX FORTF~AN V5.6 UPD DOC 1 *FS* 36-28231-0? THEF~!zA,L P.~ARCODE LABEL 1 *FS* 99-08545-02 BOOKT~IRAP 1 (UR} AE-JF8?L-TE ~irAX FORTP►AN V5.6 SPD 2 5.16.3 6 1 - t~~ AE-LT36H-TE ~irAX FORTP;AN SSA 2 5.16.3 6 -A 1 SDP ) AE -1~tA,5 OA- TK SOFTWARE W TY ADDENDUM 1 tUR~ AV-N672V-TE V'AX FORTP►AN V5.6 PAD FIRS T 1 EN-02512-05 C~3LANGE OF ADDRESS CARD ilk.~ r~~i~li~ilpirfi~~ra~~reis~-~-~~~------~----~~~~ t~ii~~l~+~r~~~-~~~--~--~.r~.~ i Txso c~t Dc~ 5 SPD / LETTER FC~R : AV-PF4FA- TK October, 1990 d 9 Dear Service Customer, Enclosed is a software product update/maintenance release supplied as part of your software maintenance agreement. As part of its planned License Management Zbols program, Digital has initiated replacement of all Service Update PAKs (SUPs) for licensed software product with License Product Authorization Keys (PAKs).
    [Show full text]
  • I.MX 8Quadxplus Power and Performance
    NXP Semiconductors Document Number: AN12338 Application Note Rev. 4 , 04/2020 i.MX 8QuadXPlus Power and Performance 1. Introduction Contents This application note helps you to design power 1. Introduction ........................................................................ 1 management systems. It illustrates the current drain 2. Overview of i.MX 8QuadXPlus voltage supplies .............. 1 3. Power measurement of the i.MX 8QuadXPlus processor ... 2 measurements of the i.MX 8QuadXPlus Applications 3.1. VCC_SCU_1V8 power ........................................... 4 Processors taken on NXP Multisensory Evaluation Kit 3.2. VCC_DDRIO power ............................................... 4 (MEK) Platform through several use cases. 3.3. VCC_CPU/VCC_GPU/VCC_MAIN power ........... 5 3.4. Temperature measurements .................................... 5 This document provides details on the performance and 3.5. Hardware and software used ................................... 6 3.6. Measuring points on the MEK platform .................. 6 power consumption of the i.MX 8QuadXPlus 4. Use cases and measurement results .................................... 6 processors under a variety of low- and high-power 4.1. Low-power mode power consumption (Key States modes. or ‘KS’)…… ......................................................................... 7 4.2. Complex use case power consumption (Arm Core, The data presented in this application note is based on GPU active) ......................................................................... 11 5. SOC
    [Show full text]
  • Validated Processor List
    NISTIR 4557 Programming Languages and Database Language SQL VALIDATED PROCESSOR UST Including GOSIP Conformance Testing Registers Judy B. Kailey Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology National Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 April 1991 (Supersedes January 1991 Issue) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY John W. Lyons, Director NIST > NISTIR 4557 Programming Languages and Database Language SQL VALIDATED PROCESSOR LIST Including GOSIP Conformance Testing Registers Judy B. Kailey Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology National Computer Systems Laboratory Software Standards Validation Group Gaithersburg, MD 20899 April 1991 (Supersedes January 1991 Issue) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY John W. Lyons, Director lib t TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Document Organization 1 1.2.1 Language Processors 1 1.2.2 Contributors to the VPL 2 1.2.3 Other FIPS Conformance Testing Products 2 1.2.4 GOSIP Registers 2 1.3 FIPS Programming and Database Language Standards 3 1.4 Validation of Processors 3 1.4.1 Validation Requirements 3 1.4.2 Placement in the List 4 1.4.3 Removal from the List 4 1.4.4 Validation Procedures 4 1.5 Certificate of Validation 4 1.6 Registered Report 4 1.7 Processor Validation Suites 5 2. COBOL PROCESSORS 7 3. FORTRAN PROCESSORS 13 4. Ada PROCESSORS 21 5. Pascal PROCESSORS 35 6. SQL PROCESSORS 37 APPENDIX A CONTRIBUTORS TO THE LIST A-1 APPENDIX B OTHER FIPS CONFORMANCE TESTING B-1 APPENDIX C REGISTER OF GOSIP ABSTRACT TEST SUITES C-1 APPENDIX D REGISTER OF GOSIP MEANS OF TESTING D-1 APPENDIX E REGISTER OF GOSIP CONFORMANCE TESTING LABORATORIES E-1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Solaris Powerpc Edition: Installing Solaris Software—May 1996 What Is a Profile
    SolarisPowerPC Edition: Installing Solaris Software 2550 Garcia Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043 U.S.A. A Sun Microsystems, Inc. Business Copyright 1996 Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2550 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043-1100 U.S.A. All rights reserved. This product or document is protected by copyright and distributed under licenses restricting its use, copying, distribution, and decompilation. No part of this product or document may be reproduced in any form by any means without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any. Portions of this product may be derived from the UNIX® system, licensed from Novell, Inc., and from the Berkeley 4.3 BSD system, licensed from the University of California. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries and is exclusively licensed by X/Open Company Ltd. Third-party software, including font technology in this product, is protected by copyright and licensed from Sun’s suppliers. RESTRICTED RIGHTS LEGEND: Use, duplication, or disclosure by the government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 and FAR 52.227-19. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, Solaris, Solstice, SunOS, OpenWindows, ONC, NFS, DeskSet are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Dfx Oral History Panel Gordon Campbell, Scott Sellers, Ross Q. Smith, and Gary M. Tarolli
    3dfx Oral History Panel Gordon Campbell, Scott Sellers, Ross Q. Smith, and Gary M. Tarolli Interviewed by: Shayne Hodge Recorded: July 29, 2013 Mountain View, California CHM Reference number: X6887.2013 © 2013 Computer History Museum 3dfx Oral History Panel Shayne Hodge: OK. My name is Shayne Hodge. This is July 29, 2013 at the afternoon in the Computer History Museum. We have with us today the founders of 3dfx, a graphics company from the 1990s of considerable influence. From left to right on the camera-- I'll let you guys introduce yourselves. Gary Tarolli: I'm Gary Tarolli. Scott Sellers: I'm Scott Sellers. Ross Smith: Ross Smith. Gordon Campbell: And Gordon Campbell. Hodge: And so why don't each of you take about a minute or two and describe your lives roughly up to the point where you need to say 3dfx to continue describing them. Tarolli: All right. Where do you want us to start? Hodge: Birth. Tarolli: Birth. Oh, born in New York, grew up in rural New York. Had a pretty uneventful childhood, but excelled at math and science. So I went to school for math at RPI [Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute] in Troy, New York. And there is where I met my first computer, a good old IBM mainframe that we were just talking about before [this taping], with punch cards. So I wrote my first computer program there and sort of fell in love with computer. So I became a computer scientist really. So I took all their computer science courses, went on to Caltech for VLSI engineering, which is where I met some people that influenced my career life afterwards.
    [Show full text]