Eric Lipton Deposition in United States District Court for the District Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eric Lipton Deposition in United States District Court for the District Of Case 1:17-cv-00246-MW-GRJ Document 90-1 Filed 10/05/18 Page 1 of 145 Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 3 GAINSVILLE DIVISION 4 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 6 KEVIN FOLTA, PhD, : Case No. 7 Plaintiff, : 1:17-cv-246-MW-GRJ 8 vs. : 9 NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, : 10 And ERIC LIPTON, : 11 Defendants. 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 13 14 VIDEO DEPOSITION OF ERIC F. LIPTON 15 16 Washington, DC 17 Tuesday, September 25, 2018 18 19 20 21 REPORTED BY: 22 DONALD R. THACKER 23 VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS MID-ATLANTIC REGION 24 1801 Market Street – Suite 1800 Philadelphia, PA 19103 25 Veritext Legal Solutions 215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830 Case 1:17-cv-00246-MW-GRJ Document 90-1 Filed 10/05/18 Page 2 of 145 Page 2 Page 4 1 Video Deposition of Eric F. Lipton, called for 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 examination pursuant to notice of deposition on Tuesday, 2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on the record at 3 September 25, 2018, in Washington, DC, at the law offices 3 10:09 a.m., September 25th, 2018. Please note that the 4 of Ballard Spahr, LLP, at 10:10 a.m., before Donald R. 4 microphones are sensitive and may pick up whispering, 5 Thacker, a Notary Public within and for the District of 5 private conversations and cellular interference. Please 6 Columbia, when were present on behalf of the respective 6 turn off all cell phones or place on vibrate away from the 7 parties: 7 microphone as they can interfere with the audio. Audio and 8 LANE R. JUBB, JR., ESQ. 8 video recording will continue to take place unless all 9 The Beasley Law Firm, LLC 9 parties agree to go off of the record. 10 1125 Walnut Street 10 This is unit one of the video recorded 11 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 11 deposition of Mr. Eric Lipton taken by counsel for 12 215-592-1000 215-592-8360 12 plaintiff in the matter of Kevin Folta, Dr. Kevin Folta 13 [email protected] 13 versus the New York Times Company filed in the 14 [email protected] 14 United States District Court, Northern District of Florida, 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 Gainesville Division. Case No. 1:17-cv-246-MW-GRJ. 16 16 This deposition is being held at the offices of 17 CAROL LoCICERO, ESQ. 17 Ballard Spahr located at 1909 K Street Northwest, 12th 18 MARK R. CARAMANICA, ESQ. 18 Floor, Washington D.C. 20006. 19 Thomas & LoCicero 19 My name is Eliza Spikes from the firm 20 601 South Boulevard 20 of Veritext Court Reporters and Donald Thacker also from 21 Tampa, Florida 33606 21 the firm of Veritext. I am not authorized to administer an 22 813-984-3060 813-984-3070 22 oath, I am not related to any party and I am not interested 23 23 in the outcome. 24 24 Counsel who are present in the room and everyone 25 - continued - 25 attending remotely will now state their appearances and Page 3 Page 5 1 APPEARANCES: (Continued) 1 their information for the record. If there are any 2 2 objections to this proceeding, please state them at the 3 AL-AMYN SULAR, ESQ. 3 time of your appearance beginning with the party noticing 4 New York Times 4 this proceeding. 5 620 8th Avenue 5 MR. JUBB: Good morning, Lane Jubb and James 6 New York, New York 10018 6 Beasley for the Plaintiff. 7 7 MS. LoCICERO: Carol LoCicero with Thomas & 8 8 LoCicero for the Defendants, and the only objection is 9 9 really not an objection, I don't think we are going to have 10 10 a problem with it, but I want to put on the record to make 11 11 it clear that this deposition and the video tape and the 12 12 information we learn here is for the purposes of litigation 13 13 only, and that to the extent that we need to designate it 14 14 confidential so that it won't be used outside the 15 15 proceeding we are going to do that. 16 16 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter 17 17 please administer the oath. 18 18 Whereupon, 19 19 ERIC F. LIPTON 20 20 was called as a witness and, having first been duly sworn, 21 21 was examined and testified as follows: 22 22 MS. LoCICERO: The only issue we didn't get the 23 23 other appearances for the record. 24 24 MR. CARAMANICA: Mark Caramanica, Thomas & 25 25 LoCicero. 2 (Pages 2 - 5) Veritext Legal Solutions 215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830 Case 1:17-cv-00246-MW-GRJ Document 90-1 Filed 10/05/18 Page 3 of 145 Page 6 Page 8 1 MR. SULAR: Al-Amyn Sular for the New York 1 reporter? 2 Times. 2 A I covered the lobbying industry and beyond 3 EXAMINATION 3 lobbying, campaigns to influence public opinion. 4 BY MR. JUBB: 4 Q In the 2015 timeframe -- let me back up. My 5 Q Mr. Lipton, good morning. We met briefly off 5 questions are all going to refer to that timeframe unless 6 the record. My name is Lane Jubb, I represent the 6 otherwise stated; okay? 7 Plaintiff in this case. I'm going to take your deposition 7 A Okay. 8 today; okay? 8 Q What was your role at the New York Times in 9 A Yes. 9 September of 2015 in terms of the specialty of journalism 10 Q Have you had your deposition taken before? 10 that you practice? 11 A Yes. 11 A I was writing about campaigns to influence 12 Q When was that? 12 public opinion and government. 13 A When I was a young person in Philadelphia, and 13 Q Was there a practice group name for it or was 14 my I family sued a company over a matter and I was deposed. 14 that just your personal description of it? 15 Q I am sorry to interrupt you. In that matter you 15 A It didn't really, it was just an area that I 16 were not a defendant or had nothing to do with journalism 16 covered. 17 or anything like that? 17 Q Were there other journalists in that same 18 A No. 18 sub-umbrella, if will, of journalists at the time? 19 Q I'm quite confident counsel explained to you the 19 A Not in the Washington, no. 20 rules of today's purpose, but I'll just go over a few of 20 Q And the Washington Bureau, how many folks are at 21 them if that's okay with you. 21 that location for the Times? 22 The first is that I want to make sure that you 22 A Approximately 90. 23 understand my questions, and so if I use a word wrong or 23 Q Where is that located? 24 you don't understand it I just need you to tell me and I 24 A It is at 17th and I Streets, Northwest. 25 will rephrase it. 25 Q Have you always been at that location? Page 7 Page 9 1 (Brief interruption.) 1 A Yes. 2 Q I will repeat that last one. I want to make 2 Q You mentioned you are from Philadelphia? 3 sure you understand my questions. If you don't understand 3 A Yes. 4 it you just have to tell me and I'm happy to rephrase it; 4 Q Did you ever work at any other newspaper before 5 okay? 5 the Times? 6 A Yes. 6 A Yes. 7 Q And next is, and what was pointed out, we will 7 Q Which newspaper? 8 talk slow so that he can take down everything that we are 8 A I worked at the Valley News in Lebanon, New 9 saying. And I would ask that you allow me to get my 9 Hampshire when I first graduated from college and then I 10 question out before you answer, and I'll do my best to let 10 worked Hartford Currant in Connecticut and at the 11 you get your full answer out before I interject. It's 11 Washington Post. 12 going to appear conversational, we may step on each other 12 Q It's my understanding that you won a couple of 13 so I apologize in advance for that, but it's good for him 13 awards; is that right? 14 and it's good for us lawyers later when we read the 14 A Yes. 15 transcript; okay? 15 Q Can you tell me about those? 16 A Yes. 16 A In 1992 I won a Pulitzer Prize for when I worked 17 Q Otherwise I think we can probably go through 17 for the Hartford Currant for explanatory journalism, and in 18 this and if there are any issues we'll look at them when 18 2015 when I was at the Times, New York Times I won for 19 they come. 19 investigative reporting, and I was part of the team of 20 How long have you been with the New York Times? 20 reporters in 2017 that won a Pulitzer Prize for Foreign 21 A Nineteen years. 21 Reporting. 22 Q In that 19 years have you had the same -- 22 Q In 2015 you start said part of a team, were you 23 strike.
Recommended publications
  • The New York Times 2014 Innovation Report
    Innovation March 24, 2014 Executive Summary Innovation March 24, 2014 2 Executive Summary Introduction and Flipboard often get more traffic from Times journalism than we do. The New York Times is winning at journalism. Of all In contrast, over the last year The Times has the challenges facing a media company in the digi- watched readership fall significantly. Not only is the tal age, producing great journalism is the hardest. audience on our website shrinking but our audience Our daily report is deep, broad, smart and engaging on our smartphone apps has dipped, an extremely — and we’ve got a huge lead over the competition. worrying sign on a growing platform. At the same time, we are falling behind in a sec- Our core mission remains producing the world’s ond critical area: the art and science of getting our best journalism. But with the endless upheaval journalism to readers. We have always cared about in technology, reader habits and the entire busi- the reach and impact of our work, but we haven’t ness model, The Times needs to pursue smart new done enough to crack that code in the digital era. strategies for growing our audience. The urgency is This is where our competitors are pushing ahead only growing because digital media is getting more of us. The Washington Post and The Wall Street crowded, better funded and far more innovative. Journal have announced aggressive moves in re- The first section of this report explores in detail cent months to remake themselves for this age. First the need for the newsroom to take the lead in get- Look Media and Vox Media are creating newsrooms ting more readers to spend more time reading more custom-built for digital.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump, Twitter, and the Russians: the Growing Obsolescence of Federal Campaign Finance Law
    3. FINAL GAUGHAN (DO NOT DELETE) 2/27/2018 5:43 PM TRUMP, TWITTER, AND THE RUSSIANS: THE GROWING OBSOLESCENCE OF FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW ANTHONY J. GAUGHAN* I. INTRODUCTION The 2016 presidential campaign defied the conventional wisdom in virtually every regard. Donald Trump’s surprise victory disproved the polls and embarrassed the pundits in the biggest election upset since the 1948 Truman-Dewey race.1 But the 2016 election was more than a political earthquake. The campaign also made it starkly apparent that federal campaign finance law has become woefully outdated in the age of the internet, social media, and non-stop fundraising. A vestige of the post- Watergate reforms of the 1970s, the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”) no longer adequately regulates the campaign finance world of twenty-first century American politics. The time has come for a sweeping reform and restructuring of the law. Since FECA’s adoption in the 1970s, federal campaign finance law has been built on four pillars. The first is contribution limits on donations to candidate campaigns and political party committees. Contribution limits are designed to reduce the role of money in politics by preventing large donors from corrupting elected officials. The second is the ban on foreign contributions to American political campaigns. The prohibition is intended to prevent foreign influence on American elections and to ensure that * Professor of Law, Drake University Law School; J.D. Harvard University, 2005; Ph.D. (history) University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2002; M.A. Louisiana State University, 1996; B.A. University of Minnesota, 1993. The author would like to thank Paul Litton and the University of Missouri Law School faculty for very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article that the author presented at Mizzou Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Law As Source: How the Legal System Facilitates Investigative Journalism
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW Law as Source: How the Legal System Facilitates Investigative Journalism Roy Shapir Legal scholarshave long recognized that the media plays a key role in assuring the proper functioning of political and business markets Yet we have understudied the role of law in assuring effective media scrutiny. This Article develops a theory of law as source. The basicpremise is that the law not only regulates what the media can or cannot say, but also facilitates media scrutiny by producing information. Specifically, law enforcement actions, such as litigationor regulatory investigations, extract information on the behaviorofpowerfulplayers in business or government. Journalists can then translate the information into biting investigative reports and diffuse them widely, thereby shapingplayers' reputationsand norms. Levels of accountabilityin society are therefore not simply a function of the effectiveness of the courts as a watchdog or the media as a watchdog but rather a function of the interactions between the two watchdogs. This Article approaches, from multiple angles, the questions of how and how much the media relies on legal sources. I analyze the content of projects that won investigative reportingprizes in the past two decades; interview forty veteran reporters; scour a reporters-onlydatabase of tip sheets and how-to manuals; go over * IDC Law School. I thank participants in the Information in Litigation Roundtable at Washington & Lee, the Annual Corporate and Securities Litigation Workshop at UCLA, several conferences at IDC, the American Law and Economics Association annual conference at Boston University, and the Crisis in the Theory of the Firm conference and the Annual Reputation Symposium at Oxford University, as well as Jonathan Glater, James Hamilton, Andrew Tuch, and Verity Winship for helpful comments and discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Reporters Workshop Notebook
    2019 ­ Reporters' ­ Workshop ­ O C T OBE R 2 8 -2 9 , 2 0 1 9 Tallahassee, Florida floridabar.org/news/resources/rpt-nbk #TFBRW2019 Presented by: The Florida Bar Media & Communications Law Committee 2019 Florida Bar Reporter's workshop ­ Locations & information ­ DoubleTree Hotel - 101 S. Adams St, . Florida Supreme Court - 500 S. Duval St. The Reporters' Workshop is primarily an educational experience, not a news event. This policy on quotation of remarks furthers that primary goal. Comments during the program. Unless otherwise specified, all comments made as part of the program, in remarks addressing the group as a whole, are on the record. A speaker may unilaterally, before or promptly after a comment, designate it as off the record, meaning it is for the reporters' information only and may not be quoted or attributed in any manner. In such a circumstance, a reporter is welcome to follow up with the speaker in an interview that is made clearly on the record and may ask the speaker to remove or modify the off-the-record restriction. Informal discussions. All comments made in informal conversations, including mealtime conversations, among participants and panelists are on background, meaning the speaker may not be quoted by name or title but may be quoted in a generic manner that reasonably masks the speaker's identity. A speaker may designate a greater restriction before or immediately after making a comment. A participant is free to use the information for other reporting. In publishing any information gained at the workshop, participants are urged to reflect upon the possible adverse effects on future programs from how the material is used.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Galleries* Rules Governing Press
    PRESS GALLERIES* SENATE PRESS GALLERY The Capitol, Room S–316, phone 224–0241 Director.—S. Joseph Keenan Deputy Director.—Joan McKinney Media Coordinators: Michael Cavaiola Wendy A. Oscarson Amy H. Gross James D. Saris HOUSE PRESS GALLERY The Capitol, Room H–315, phone 225–3945 Superintendent.—Jerry L. Gallegos Deputy Superintendent.—Justin J. Supon Assistant Superintendents: Ric Andersen Drew Cannon Molly Cain Laura Reed STANDING COMMITTEE OF CORRESPONDENTS Bill Walsh, Times-Picayne, Chair Thomas Ferraro, Reuters, Secretary Susan Ferrechio, Congressional Quarterly Carl Hulse, New York Times Andrew Taylor, Associated Press RULES GOVERNING PRESS GALLERIES 1. Administration of the press galleries shall be vested in a Standing Committee of Cor- respondents elected by accredited members of the galleries. The Committee shall consist of five persons elected to serve for terms of two years. Provided, however, that at the election in January 1951, the three candidates receiving the highest number of votes shall serve for two years and the remaining two for one year. Thereafter, three members shall be elected in odd-numbered years and two in even-numbered years. Elections shall be held in January. The Committee shall elect its own chairman and secretary. Vacancies on the Committee shall be filled by special election to be called by the Standing Committee. 2. Persons desiring admission to the press galleries of Congress shall make application in accordance with Rule VI of the House of Representatives, subject to the direction and control of the Speaker and Rule 33 of the Senate, which rules shall be interpreted and administered by the Standing Committee of Correspondents, subject to the review and an approval by the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners and Finalists
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Defendant. COMPLAINT LAURENCE H. TRIBE* AMBASSADOR (RET.) NORMAN L. EISEN Carl M. Loeb University Professor and Chair, Board of Directors Professor of Constitutional Law RICHARD W. PAINTER Harvard Law School Vice Chair, Board of Directors 1575 Massachusetts Avenue NOAH BOOKBINDER Cambridge, MA 02138 ADAM J. RAPPAPORT (617) 495-1767 STUART C. MCPHAIL Citizens for Responsibility and ERWIN CHEMERINSKY* Ethics in Washington Dean of the School of Law 455 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., 6th Floor University of California, Irvine Washington, D.C. 20001 401 East Peltason Drive (202) 408-5565 Irvine, CA 92697 (949) 824-7722 DEEPAK GUPTA JONATHAN E. TAYLOR ZEPHYR TEACHOUT* RACHEL BLOOMEKATZ Associate Professor of Law MATTHEW SPURLOCK Fordham Law School Gupta Wessler PLLC 150 West 62nd Street 1735 20th Street, N.W. New York, NY 12580 Washington, D.C. 20009 (646) 312-8722 (202) 888-1741 [email protected] *Affiliations noted for identification purposes only Attorneys for Plaintiff Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Nature of the Action .......................................................................................................... 1 II. Parties, Jurisdiction, and Venue ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of the Winners
    Office of Public Affairs Columbia University New York, N.Y. 10027 April 20, 2015 212-854-5573 Biographies of the Winners Following are biographies of the 2015 Pulitzer Prize winners as submitted in entries by their editor, publisher or other representative. Investigative Reporting Eric Lipton is an investigative reporter in the Washington bureau of The New York Times, where he writes about lobbying, ethics and corporate agendas. He joined the Washington bureau in 2004, initially to cover terrorism and homeland security. From 1999 until 2001, Mr. Lipton was a reporter for the Metro section of The Times covering City Hall and Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani. In September 2001, he was assigned to write exclusively about the attack on the World Trade Center, a topic he covered for two years; he ultimately co-wrote a book on the topic, “City in the Sky: The Rise and Fall of the World Trade Center” (Times Books, 2003). In 2002, a package of articles Mr. Lipton wrote with James Glanz and other science reporters at The Times about ground zero was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in explanatory journalism. Before joining The Times, Mr. Lipton spent five years at The Washington Post as a Metro reporter. From 1989 until 1994, Mr. Lipton worked at The Hartford Courant. While at The Courant, he and a colleague won the 1992 Pulitzer Prize for explanatory journalism for their stories about the flaw in the main mirror of the Hubble Space Telescope. Mr. Lipton started his daily newspaper career in 1987 at a small New Hampshire paper, The Valley News.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 YEARS1975 – 2015 Post Your Job Openings with IRE!
    THE JOURNAL SECOND QUARTER 2015 40 YEARS1975 – 2015 Post your job openings with IRE! Featuring: • A listing on our quick-look grid. • A link to a page of your own, where your listing can continue in great detail. • No need to count words or lines! Explain the job, profile the company, describe the city. • Listing within 24 hours for emailed postings. • A six-week web life. • One low $150 price per job listed. For more information, call IRE at 573-882-2042 or email your announcement to: [email protected]. Be sure to include your billing address. Blind box service: For an additional $50, a blind email address can be set up with automatic forwarding of cover letters and resumes. Can’t afford to attend IRE training? Apply for a fellowship or scholarship! www.ire.org/events-and-training/fellowships-and-scholarships/ THE JOURNAL SECOND QUARTER 4 YOUNG AT HEART By Mark Horvit, IRE 5 IRE NEWS 26 IRE AWARDS 34 SNAPSHOTS FROM OUR BLOGS ABOUT THE COVER The cover was inspired by an illustration by Kee Rash. Rash was in the art department at the Arizona Republic, and drew the cartoon for a t-shirt for the IRE members 40 YEARS1975 – 2015 that came to Phoenix in 1976. 6 FOUR DECADES OF 14 THE HISTORY OF CAR 18 PROGRESS OF COLLABORATION INVESTIGATIVE IRE adds computer-assisted REPORTING OVERSEAS IRE develops as investigative reporting arm as journalists Four journalists share reporting advances find data the state of international By Leonard Downie Jr., By Jennifer LaFleur, The Center for investigative reporting Arizona State University Investigative
    [Show full text]
  • CREW Worst Governors Repor
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………1 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………...2 The Governors I. Haley Barbour (R-MS)………..…………………………………………………..3 II. Donald L. Carcieri (R-RI)…………………………………………………………6 III. Jim Gibbons (R-NV).…………………………..………………………………….9 IV. Bobby Jindal (R-LA).…………..………………………………………………..13 V. David A. Paterson (D-NY).……………………………..……………………….16 VI. Sonny Perdue (R-GA)..……………………..…………………………………...18 VII. Rick Perry (R-TX)……….………………..……………………………………..21 VIII. Bill Richardson (D-NM)…………………………………………………………25 IX. Mike Rounds (R-SD).…………………….……………………….......................28 X. Mark Sanford (R-SC)…………………………………………………………….30 XI. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA)..………………………………………………..33 INTRODUCTION Since 2003, CREW has closely monitored government ethics, bringing egregious conduct to light and holding public officials accountable for their misconduct. With a few exceptions, CREW has focused primarily on the ethics of federal government officials. In 2006, however, CREW launched the state-based Colorado Ethics Watch (CEW), which concentrates on public integrity at the state level. In 2009, CREW turned greater attention to state government ethics by publishing its Directory of State-based Government Watchdogs, which covers all 50 states and the District of Columbia. CREW’s Worst Governors delves further into state ethics. CREW reviewed the job performance of all 50 of our nation’s governors to determine which are the worst. CREW considered whether governors had violated ethics, campaign finance and personal financial disclosure rules as well as whether they had complied with state transparency laws. It is nearly impossible to compare governors’ adherence to the laws because state rules and laws vary so widely. Each state has its own ethical rules and standards. Requirements regarding disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures and personal finances differ significantly as do state open records laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners Biography Or Autobiography Year Winner 1917
    A Monthly Newsletter of Ibadan Book Club – December Edition www.ibadanbookclub.webs.com, www.ibadanbookclub.wordpress.com E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] Pulitzer Prize Winners Biography or Autobiography Year Winner 1917 Julia Ward Howe, Laura E. Richards and Maude Howe Elliott assisted by Florence Howe Hall 1918 Benjamin Franklin, Self-Revealed, William Cabell Bruce 1919 The Education of Henry Adams, Henry Adams 1920 The Life of John Marshall, Albert J. Beveridge 1921 The Americanization of Edward Bok, Edward Bok 1922 A Daughter of the Middle Border, Hamlin Garland 1923 The Life and Letters of Walter H. Page, Burton J. Hendrick 1924 From Immigrant to Inventor, Michael Idvorsky Pupin 1925 Barrett Wendell and His Letters, M.A. DeWolfe Howe 1926 The Life of Sir William Osler, Harvey Cushing 1927 Whitman, Emory Holloway 1928 The American Orchestra and Theodore Thomas, Charles Edward Russell 1929 The Training of an American: The Earlier Life and Letters of Walter H. Page, Burton J. Hendrick 1930 The Raven, Marquis James 1931 Charles W. Eliot, Henry James 1932 Theodore Roosevelt, Henry F. Pringle 1933 Grover Cleveland, Allan Nevins 1934 John Hay, Tyler Dennett 1935 R.E. Lee, Douglas S. Freeman 1936 The Thought and Character of William James, Ralph Barton Perry 1937 Hamilton Fish, Allan Nevins 1938 Pedlar's Progress, Odell Shepard, Andrew Jackson, Marquis James 1939 Benjamin Franklin, Carl Van Doren 1940 Woodrow Wilson, Life and Letters, Vol. VII and VIII, Ray Stannard Baker 1941 Jonathan Edwards, Ola Elizabeth Winslow 1942 Crusader in Crinoline, Forrest Wilson 1943 Admiral of the Ocean Sea, Samuel Eliot Morison 1944 The American Leonardo: The Life of Samuel F.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereby Afforded Precedential Value for Lower Courts Faced with Similar Matters
    Vol. 4 4 , No. HARVARD JOURNAL 3 of HARVARD LAW & PUBLIC POLICY VOLUME 44, NUMBER 3 SUMMER 2021 J OURNAL OURNAL ARTICLES THE “ESSENTIAL” FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE Josh Blackman of THE LEGALITY OF PRESIDENTIAL SELF-PARDONS LAW Paul J. Larkin, Jr. THE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECTS OF & THE SUPREME COURT’S EMERGENCY STAYS PUBLIC Trevor N. McFadden & Vetan Kapoor ESSAY POLICY COMMON GOOD ORIGINALISM: OUR TRADITION AND OUR PATH FORWARD Josh Hammer NOTES LEVEL-UP REMEDIES FOR RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Summer 202 1 Pages 636 to 992 HARVARD JOURNAL of LAW & PUBLIC POLICY VOLUME 44, NUMBER 3 SUMMER 2021 ARTICLES THE “ESSENTIAL” FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE Josh Blackman .................................................................. 637 THE LEGALITY OF PRESIDENTIAL SELF-PARDONS Paul J. Larkin, Jr. ............................................................ 763 THE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE SUPREME COURT’S EMERGENCY STAYS Trevor N. McFadden & Vetan Kapoor ........................... 827 ESSAY COMMON GOOD ORIGINALISM: OUR TRADITION AND OUR PATH FORWARD Josh Hammer ................................................................... 917 NOTE LEVEL-UP REMEDIES FOR RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Mark C. Gillespie ............................................................. 961 HARVARD JOURNAL of LAW & PUBLIC POLICY Editor-in-Chief MAX BLOOM Articles Chair Deputy Editor-in-Chief Managing Editors JASON MUEHLHOFF JAY SCHAEFER JOHN KETCHAM STUART SLAYTON Chief Financial Officer Senior Articles Editors COOPER GODFREY Deputy Managing Editors JOHN ACTON Deputy Chief Financial Officer
    [Show full text]