DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia's Oil&Gas Development and Exports Trends Oil Industry Gas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia's Oil&Gas Development and Exports Trends Oil Industry Gas Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV Russia’s Oil&Gas Development and Exports Trends Alexey GROMOV, PhD, Principal Director on Energy Studies Institute for Energy and Finance The Eleventh Japan-Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue (JREED) Niigata, Japan 30th January 2019 1 Oil Industry Global oil market context Russian oil production and export trends up to 2023 2 Gas Industry EU Gas market trends Russian gas production and export trends up to 2023 1 ©ERINA Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV OPEC+ Agreement has a crucial role to stabilize the global oil market 90 $/bbl Brent WTI 80 70 60 OPEC+ Agreement Update 50 (June 2018) OPEC+ Agreement 40 Update (December 2018) OPEC+ OECD commercial Agreement stocks reduction 30 Decrease (December during 2015 2016) 20 01/15 03/15 05/15 07/15 09/15 11/15 01/16 03/16 05/16 07/16 09/16 11/16 01/17 03/17 05/17 07/17 09/17 11/17 01/18 03/18 05/18 07/18 09/18 11/18 • OPEC+ Agreement (December 2016) to cut collective oil production of 1,8 MMb/d supported global oil prices and reduced price volatility in 1Q2017- 1Q2018. • The threat of US sanctions against Iranian oil exports led to OPEC+ Agreement Update in June 2018 (increase collective oil production of 1 MMb/d). • New OPEC+ Agreement Update (December 2018) to cut collective oil production of 1,2 MMb/d has to reduce the oil market volatility in 2019 2 OPEC+ Agreement Update in December 2018 lead to gradually balancing the global oil market in 2019 Changes in global liquid fuels market balance Mbd 2.0 1.6 1.2 -0,4 -0,4 0.8 -0,8 0,75 0.4 0,7 +0,2 +0,2 +0,4 0,4 0,35 +0,4 -0,1 0,1 0.0 -0,2 +0,3 +1,2 -0,1 +0,3 -0,5 +0,3 -0.4 +0,2 -0,0 +0,2 Доп. рост -0,1 +0,1 -0.8 спроса +0,2 -1.2 -1.6 -2.0 OPECОПЕКNon Не СШАUS ОПЕКOPEC Non Не СШАUS OPEC ОПЕКNon Не СШАUS OPEC ОПЕКNon Не СШАUS ОПЕКOPEC * ОПЕКOPEC* ОПЕКOPEC * ОПЕКOPEC* 4Q СпросD ПредложениеSupply 1Q СпросD ПредложениеSupply 2Q СпросD ПредложениеSupply 3Q СпросD ПредложениеSupply 4Q 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 СнижениеDecrease in предложенияsupply /Increase/увеличение in demand спроса УвеличениеIncrease in supply/Decrease предложения in/ снижениеdemand спроса Notes: D - Demand * Not including US 3 Source: IEF estimates bases on EIA, МЭА, ОПЕК data ©ERINA Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV Russiaʼs Role in the OPEC+ Agreement 1Q 2017 – 1Q 2018 Russia’s share in the collective oil production cuts planned in 2017 within OPEC+ Agreement (tbd) • Russia played central role bringing about OPEC and non-OPEC output reduction deals of December 2016 • Russia pledged to gradually lower output by 300,000 b/d during first half of 2017 compared with October 2016 level (largest non-OPEC reduction) • Russia with Saudi Arabia now apparently co- determining OPEC+ policy OPEC+ Agreement Update (June 2018) Level of Russian compliance with initial OPEC+ Agreement • Russia and Saudi Arabia ensured the implementation of ‘Vienna Alliance’ members’ production cut target, 2017-18 decision to increase the collective oil production of 1MMbd in coming months • Russia exceeds October 2016 baseline for production cuts for first time in October 2018, setting new oil output record of 11,6 MMb/d (activating most spare capacity built up during period of output cuts) OPEC+ Agreement Update (December 2018) • Russia played central role to reach new Update for OPEC+ Agreement (restart of collective oil output cuts of 1,2 MMb/d from January 2019) Source: IHS Markit 4 1 Oil Industry Global oil market context Russian oil production and export trends up to 2023 2 Gas Industry EU Gas market trends Russian gas production and export trends up to 2023 5 ©ERINA Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV Russian oil production back to growth in 2018 . Russian oil production cuts within Russia’ crude oil production, 1989-2018 OPEC+Agreement led to oil production decrease 600 in 2017 up to 546,2 MMt (-0,3% y-o-y), for the first MMt CRUDE OIL LEASE CONDENSATE time in last 10 years 500 400 . But Russian oil production back to growth in 2018 300 and ensured new annual oil output record of 556 MMt (11,35 MMb/d) due to the activation of most 200 spare capacity built up during period of output cuts 100 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Russia’ crude oil production by key oil&gas . After 10 years of decline the Western Siberia’ oil regions, 2014-17 output back to growth in 2018 due to increase oil 350 MMt production in Yamalo-Nenets AO lower 1 MMt 1-2 MMt 300 . Greenfield expansion have supported the raise of oil 2-5 MMt more 5 MMt output in the Eastern Siberia (Suzun and Vankor) and 250 on Caspian onshore (Filanovsky’ field) 200 11,4% 10,5% 150 18,6% 18,4% 100 50 32,2% 31,3% 0 2014 2017 2014 2017 2014 2017 2014 2017 Western Siberia Ural-Volga Eastern Siberia and Timan-Pechora Far East Sources: Rosstat, Russian Ministry of Energy, FIEF 6 Gazprom Neft is the main driver of oil productionʼ increase . Gazprom Neft is the main driver of Russian oil Oil output by Russian Oil&Gas Majors, 2008-17 production’ increase (+9 MMt in 2015-17) 600 MMt 77 76 500 65 61 65 69 . Rosneft continue to develop Vankor oil cluster:oil 48 51 57 62 400 output at the Suzun field raised by 4 times up to 4,14 MMt, 46 47 49 49 50 49 51 54 58 60 62 60 60 61 61 61 61 62 62 61 at the Tagul field – by 9 times up to 0,34 MMt 300 90 92 90 85 84 85 86 86 83 82 200 . Sakhalin PSAs had increased oil output in 2017 as well as 100 204 202 200 222 221 independent Russian producers including JV with Japanese 113 115 116 118 121 0 investors (INPEX, ITOCHU, JOGMEC) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Others Gazprom Tatneft . Nevertheless, oil production by Rosneft, LUKOIL and Gazprom Neft Surgutneftegaz LUKOIL Surgutneftegas decreased during this period due to Bashneft TNK-BP Rosneft OPEC+ cuts and oil output decline at the Western OPEX/bbl in upstream by Russian Oil&Gas Majors, Siberia 2014-18 8 Rosneft LUKOIL Gazprom Neft Tatneft . In 2017-18 OPEX by Russian majors have stabilized at $/bbl the level of 3-4$/bbl 6 . Russian majors have kept their costs at such a low level due 4.3 to pressure on contractors who are forced to reduce prices 4 4.2 even in the face of rising world oil prices and volumes of 3.7 work performed 3.2 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sources: Rosstat, companies’ data, FIEF estimations 7 ©ERINA Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV Idling of wells was the main instrument to achieve 2017 OPEC+ production cuts . Deactivation of (most likely marginal) wells was Change in Russian idle well count by company, October key method for achieving production cuts in 2017 2016-September 2018 . Russia’s idle well count jumped by over 5,000 between October 2016 and January 2018 . Idle well rate rose from 12,5% in October 2016 to 15,2% in January 2018 . Sharp drop in idle well count in 2018 coincided with main period of Russian oil production growth in 2018 . Russia’s idle well count has fallen over 3,000 since January 2018 . Idle well rate down to 13,2% in September 2018 . Tatneft and Rosneft have registered biggest reductions in idle well numbers in 2018, indicating new brownfield investment focus by this companies Sources: IHS Markit, FIEF 8 New field development activity up significantly in 2017 despite cuts Indexes for new oil field activity in Russia, 2016-18 Oil production at new felds inRussia,2016-18 Development drilling at new fields in Russia, 2016-18 New well completions at new fields in Russia, 2016-18 Sources: TEK Rossii 9 ©ERINA Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV Tax Reform ʻBig Maneuvreʼ is neutral for Russian upstream . Starting from 2019 theexportdutyonoilwillbe . To compensate budget losses due to the reduction multiplied by a reduction factor of export duties on oil, a new component is . Starting from 2023, theexportdutywillbereset introduced into the MET (DM coefficient)- KMAN, which actually repeats the formula for calculating . Lower oil export duty will lead to higher theexportdutyonoil domestic oil prices (net back), and alignment . of domestic oil prices and world prices (less As a result, the overall tax burden on oil logistics costs) production will not change Tax reform for mature oil fields: The Samotlor tax break . Russia’s current oil sector tax system, based on gross revenues of production, particularly burdensome for Samotlor oil production and decline rate mature field producers . Samotlor oil field has obtained (2017) major tax relief package in exchange of Rosneft promise to invest more heavily in this field redevelopment • Finance Ministry agreed to annual MET reduction for Samotlor oil field of 35 trillion rubles (around $0,6 billion) and set to last for 10 years . Finance Minsitry of Russia promised to revisit Rosneft committed to drill about 2,400 new wells and question of comparable tax breaks for other produce an incremental 50 MMt (365 MMbbd) at Samotlor mature fields in three years, after evaluating field during next 10 years impact of Samotlor experiment on federal budget Sources: Finance Ministry, IHS Markit 10 CAPEX in Upstream: from stagnation in 2016 to acceleration in 2017 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes on Moscow Exchange Index Review
    Notes on Moscow Exchange index review Moscow Exchange approves the updated list of index components and free float ratios effective from 16 March 2018. X5 Retail Group N.V. (DRs) will be added to Moscow Exchange indices with the expected weight of 1.13 per cent. As these securities were offered initially, they were added without being in the waiting list under consideration. Thus, from 16 March the indices will comprise 46 (component stocks. The MOEX Russia and RTS Index moved to a floating number of component stocks in December 2017. En+ Group plc (DRs) will be in the waiting list to be added to Moscow Exchange indices, as their liquidity rose notably over recent three months. NCSP Group (ords) with low liquidity, ROSSETI (ords) and RosAgro PLC with their weights now below the minimum permissible level (0.2 per cent) will be under consideration to be excluded from the MOEX Russia Index and RTS Index. The Blue Chip Index constituents remain unaltered. X5 Retail Group (DRs), GAZ (ords), Obuvrus LLC (ords) and TNS energo (ords) will be added to the Broad Market Index, while Common of DIXY Group and Uralkali will be removed due to delisting expected. TransContainer (ords), as its free float sank below the minimum threshold of 5 per cent, and Southern Urals Nickel Plant (ords), as its liquidity ratio declined, will be also excluded. LSR Group (ords) will be incuded into SMID Index, while SOLLERS and DIXY Group (ords) will be excluded due to low liquidity ratio. X5 Retail Group (DRs) and Obuvrus LLC (ords) will be added to the Consumer & Retail Index, while DIXY Group (ords) will be removed from the Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2014 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Sistema today 2 Corporate governance system 91 History timeline 4 Corporate governance principles 92 Company structure 8 General Meeting of shareholders 94 President’s speech 10 Board of Directors 96 Strategic Review 11 Commitees of the Board of Directors 99 Strategy 12 President and the Management Board 101 Sistema’s financial results 20 Internal control and audit 103 Shareholder capital and securities 24 Development of the corporate 104 governance system in 2014 Our investments 27 Remuneration 105 MTS 28 Risks 106 Detsky Mir 34 Sustainable development 113 Medsi Group 38 Responsible investor 114 Lesinvest Group (Segezha) 44 Social investment 115 Bashkirian Power Grid Company 52 Education, science, innovation 115 RTI 56 Culture 117 SG-trans 60 Environment 119 MTS Bank 64 Society 121 RZ Agro Holding 68 Appendices 124 Targin 72 Binnopharm 76 Real estate 80 Sistema Shyam TeleServices 84 Sistema Mass Media 88 1 SISTEMA TODAY Established in 1993, today Sistema including telecommunications, companies. Sistema’s competencies is a large private investor operating utilities, retail, high tech, pulp and focus on improvement of the in the real sector of the Russian paper, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, operational efficiency of acquired economy. Sistema’s investment railway transportation, agriculture, assets through restructuring and portfolio comprises stakes in finance, mass media, tourism, attracting industry partners to predominantly Russian companies etc. Sistema is the controlling enhance expertise and reduce
    [Show full text]
  • Tatneft Group IFRS CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CONDENSED
    Tatneft Group IFRS CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2019 Contents Report on Review of Consolidated Interim Condensed Financial Statements Consolidated Interim Condensed Financial Statements Consolidated Interim Condensed Statement of Financial Position (unaudited) ........................................ 1 Consolidated Interim Condensed Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income (unaudited) ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Consolidated Interim Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity (unaudited) ........................................ 4 Consolidated Interim Condensed Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited) .................................................. 5 Notes to the Consolidated Interim Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) Note 1: Organisation ................................................................................................................................. 7 Note 2: Basis of preparation ...................................................................................................................... 7 Note 3: Adoption of new or revised standards and interpretations .......................................................... 10 Note 4: Cash and cash equivalents .......................................................................................................... 12 Note 5: Accounts receivable ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest Public Companies
    An Overview Of Boards Of Directors At Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies,” while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the impetuous development of digital technologies continues The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times Twenty-four percent of the companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Tatneft Company
    LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TATNEFT COMPANY ABOUT OPERATIONS CORPORATE FINANCIAL SOCIAL INDUSTRIAL SAFETY & PJSC TATNEFT, ANNUAL REPORT 2015 THE COMPANY MANAGEMENT RESULTS RESPONSIBILITY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CONTENTS ABOUT THE COMPANY 01 Joint Address to Shareholders, Investors and Partners .......................................................................................................... 02 The Company’s Mission ....................................................................................................................................................... 04 Equity Holding Structure of PJSC TATNEFT ........................................................................................................................... 06 Development and Continuity of the Company’s Strategic Initiatives.......................................................................................... 09 Business Model ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Finanical Position and Strengthening the Assets Structure ...................................................................................................... 12 Major Industrial Factors Affecting the Company’s Activity in 2015 ............................................................................................ 18 Model of Sustainable Development of the Company ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ROSNEFT Focused on Delivering Value
    ROSNEFTROSNEFT FocusedFocused onon DeliveringDelivering ValueValue Peter O’Brien, Member of Management Board Vice-President, Finance & Investments Investor Roadshow Highlights from Q3 2008 December 2008 Important Notice The information contained herein has been prepared by the Company. The opinions presented herein are based on general information gathered at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. The Company relies on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. These materials contain statements about future events and expectations that are forward-looking statements. Any statement in these materials that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We assume no obligations to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting these statements. This presentation does not constitute an offer or invitation to sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe for or purchase any securities and nothing contained herein shall form the basis of any contract or commitment whatsoever. No reliance may be placed for any purposes whatsoever on the information contained in this presentation or on its completeness, accuracy or fairness. The information in this presentation is subject to verification, completion and change. The contents of this presentation have not been verified by the Company. Accordingly, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by or on behalf of the Company or any of its shareholders, directors, officers or employees or any other person as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 90 International Scientific-Practical Conference on Business Cooperation (ISPCBS 2019) Methodical and practical aspects of the analysis of the state and development of risk management systems for international corporations Rykhtikova Natalia Faculty of Economics and Management Moscow regional branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Krasnogorsk branch of RANEPA Krasnogorsk, Russian Federation [email protected] Abstract—In this article, the essence and main main areas of study of risk management systems of modern characteristics of the category “risk management system of an corporations are the following: formation principles [3], [4], organization” are described. It is proposed to consider five elements of risk culture, such as identification, assessment, levels of risk management system development (the third, the prioritization, and others [3], [4], [5], [6], risk management as fourth and the fifth levels are typical for international a basis for ensuring economic security [2], [3]. But it should corporations). We present the results of the risk management be noted that the complexity and mutual influence of systems analysis for international corporations, namely: processes and procedures of risk management requires the RusHydro, NLMK, Severstal, Gazprom Neft, Metalloinvest, use of a systematic approach that allows taking into account Philips, Nestlé, Unilever, and others. Criteria for comparative all the factors and elements that influence the productivity characteristics of systems implementation experience are the and efficiency of the RMS. The purpose of this research is to following: the role in the organization management, basic standards, risk coverage, features of risk assessment and determine the parameters, levels and directions of the RMS management, frequency and content of improvement measures, development of modern organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Securities Market Newsletter
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody April 22, 2021 Issue No. 2021/15 Market News Central bank places RUB 4.98 bln coupon bonds out of RUB 23.6 bln On April 20, 2021 it was reported that Russia’s central bank had sold RUB 4.975 bln out of RUB 23.601 bln coupon bonds during the day. The cut-off and the weighted average prices amounted to 100% of a face value each. Demand totaled RUB 5.017 bln. The settlement date was April 21. Finance Ministry fully places RUB 20 bln OFZ bonds On April 21, 2021 it was stated that Russia’s Finance Ministry had fully placed during the day RUB 20 bln of OFZ 26236 government bonds with a fixed coupon maturing in May 2028. The cut-off price and the weighted average price amounted to 93.11% of a face value. The cut-off yield and the weighted average yield stood at 7.07%. Demand for the bonds totaled RUB 83.7 bln. Company News MTS raises stake to 100% in 6 local fixed-line operators On April 15, 2021 it was stated that Major Russian mobile operator MTS had exercised a call option with provider of broadband and digital TV services Zelenaya Tochka Group to buy out the remaining 49% of the group’s capital in six local fixed-line network operators. Altogether, this deal will provide opportunities to more than one million Russian households to expand access to advanced solutions from across the MTS digital ecosystem. In February 2020, MTS acquired a 51% stake in Zelenaya Tochka Group – comprised of 13 local fixed-line Internet providers – via an agreement that included a provision for a three-year call option on the remaining share capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Negativliste. Fossil Energi
    Bilag 6. Negativliste. Fossil energi Maj 2017 Læsevejledning til negativlisten: Moderselskab / øverste ejer vises med fed skrift til venstre. Med almindelig tekst, indrykket, er de underliggende selskaber, der udsteder aktier og erhvervsobligationer. Det er de underliggende, udstedende selskaber, der er omfattet af negativlisten. Rækkeetiketter Acergy SA SUBSEA 7 Inc Subsea 7 SA Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Indonesia PT Alam Tri Abadi PT Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Africa Oil Corp Africa Oil Corp Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alex Energy Inc Alliance Coal Corp Alpha Appalachia Holdings Inc Alpha Appalachia Services Inc Alpha Natural Resource Inc/Old Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alpha Natural Resources LLC Alpha Natural Resources LLC / Alpha Natural Resources Capital Corp Alpha NR Holding Inc Aracoma Coal Co Inc AT Massey Coal Co Inc Bandmill Coal Corp Bandytown Coal Co Belfry Coal Corp Belle Coal Co Inc Ben Creek Coal Co Big Bear Mining Co Big Laurel Mining Corp Black King Mine Development Co Black Mountain Resources LLC Bluff Spur Coal Corp Boone Energy Co Bull Mountain Mining Corp Central Penn Energy Co Inc Central West Virginia Energy Co Clear Fork Coal Co CoalSolv LLC Cobra Natural Resources LLC Crystal Fuels Co Cumberland Resources Corp Dehue Coal Co Delbarton Mining Co Douglas Pocahontas Coal Corp Duchess Coal Co Duncan Fork Coal Co Eagle Energy Inc/US Elk Run Coal Co Inc Exeter Coal Corp Foglesong Energy Co Foundation Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Headlines
    MORNING HEADLINES RUSSIAN CAPITAL MARKETS FRIDAY, MARCH 05, 2004 Sales/TradingLondon (+44 020) 7439 6881 Moscow (+7 095) 995 2400 MARKET NEWS COMMENT Surgutneftegas minori Market: Continue to see support in Gazprom, LUKoil and the cells. PM ties attempt to cancel ratified today.RTS closed Thursday at 669.26 up 0.3% or 1.99 points from the previous close. Trading volume Thursday fell to U.S. $45.5 million from U.S. $54.2 million Wednesday. The MICEX closed Thursday at Sibneft charged with 582.11, up 0.1% from the previous close. Trading volume on the MICEX $420 mn more in back was down to $582.1 million from $660.0 million on Wednesday. taxes LUKoil JV to tap Saudi natural gas field EVENTS Russia’s cellular sub TO WATCH Mar 11 Golden Telecom 2003 US GAAP results scriber base up 5% in Mar 14 Russia's presidential election scheduled February to 39.9 million Mar 20 SurgutNG AGM Mar 26 Results of March 14 presidential elections to be an URSI: new licenses for nounced Mar 28 Sibneft EGM and 2003 GAAP results Ekaterinburg, Sverd Yukos 2003 operating results Apr 1 Russia’s oil export duty set at $35.2 per tonne lovsk region; plans con Apr 6 Sibneft’s EMG expected to be held solidation Apr 15 NW Tel to consider merger with Lensvyaz and Komi's Svyaz RUSSIAN ADRs, LONDON INDICATORS Changes Changes Price Vol 1 day 1 mo YTD Value 1 day 1 mo YTD $ $ mn % % % $ % % % Gazprom 34.2 28.2 3.0 14.8 31.9 Urals, bbl 30.7 0.7 15.1 6.5 Lukoil 116.1 79.1 1.7 15.0 24.7 Nickel, t 13150.0 5.6 12.3 20.6 Surgut 31.7 6.2 1.6 12.2 7.8 Eurobond Rus10 112.5 0.1 5.8 7.3
    [Show full text]
  • MGF Emerging Eastern
    As of Date: 03/31/21 Fund: Manulife Global Fund Emerging Eastern Europe SECURITY DESCRIPTION EXPOSURE PERCENT ASSETS SAN BNK POLSKA 3,585,167.42 2.30% NOVATEK GDR REGS 13,013,929.50 8.35% PHOSAGRO GDR 4,211,663.19 2.70% DINO POLSKA SA 5,882,789.75 3.77% INPOST SA 2,276,957.39 1.46% TURKCELL 1,095,085.98 0.70% MAVI GIYIM SANAYI 1,896,157.34 1.22% MOSCOW EXCHANGE 5,497,272.22 3.53% ARCELIK AS 2,569,145.18 1.65% MONETA MONEY BANK 3,761,508.90 2.41% CASH 2,295,775.08 1.47% MAIL.RU GROUP GDR 2,637,647.63 1.69% SEVERSTAL PJSC 3,822,707.21 2.45% TOFAS OTOMOBIL 1,821,750.99 1.17% POLYMETAL INT GBP 3,025,097.26 1.94% SABANCI 1,424,124.32 0.91% X5 RETAIL GROUP GDR 4,361,232.00 2.80% TATNEFT PREFS 3,623,430.72 2.32% ALPHA BANK 3,101,470.13 1.99% GAZPROM GDR 11,681,384.77 7.49% YANDEX 6,373,867.50 4.09% OTP BANK 3,800,706.20 2.44% PKO BP 5,387,467.99 3.45% ALLEGRO 3,859,802.93 2.48% DETSKY MIR PJSC 2,736,995.08 1.76% FONDUL PROPRIETATEA 3,992,045.77 2.56% NICKEL GDR 6,661,217.11 4.27% ROSNEFT GDR 5,349,625.34 3.43% MEDICAL PARK TURKEY 2,880,161.90 1.85% ERSTE BANK 3,480,181.41 2.23% SBERBANK ORD (NEW) 14,971,581.24 9.60% LUKOIL GDR 14,863,514.30 9.53% Rounding discrepancies possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 1 Neste 57.4 / 100 8.1 / 20 B 2 Engie 56.9 / 100 7.9 / 20 B 3 Naturgy Energy 44.8 / 100 6.8 / 20 C 4 Eni 43.6 / 100 7.3 / 20 C 5 bp 42.9 / 100 6.0 / 20 C 6 Total 40.7 / 100 6.1 / 20 C 7 Repsol 38.1 / 100 5.0 / 20 C 8 Equinor 37.9 / 100 4.9 / 20 C 9 Galp Energia 36.4 / 100 4.3 / 20 C 10 Royal Dutch Shell 34.3 / 100 3.4 / 20 C 11 ENEOS Holdings 32.4 / 100 2.6 / 20 C 12 Origin Energy 29.3 / 100 7.3 / 20 D 13 Marathon Petroleum Corporation 24.8 / 100 4.4 / 20 D 14 BHP Group 22.1 / 100 4.3 / 20 D 15 Hellenic Petroleum 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D 15 OMV 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 17 MOL Magyar Olajes Gazipari Nyrt 20.2 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 18 Ampol Limited 18.8 / 100 0.9 / 20 D 19 SK Innovation 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 19 YPF 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 21 Compania Espanola de Petroleos SAU (CEPSA) 17.9 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 22 CPC Corporation, Taiwan 17.6 / 100 2.4 / 20 D 23 Ecopetrol 17.4 / 100 2.3 / 20 D 24 Formosa Petrochemical Corp 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 24 Cosmo Energy Holdings 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 26 California Resources Corporation 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 26 Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen (PKN Orlen) 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 28 Reliance Industries 16.7 / 100 1.0 / 20 D 29 Bharat Petroleum Corporation 16.0 / 100 1.7 / 20 D 30 Santos 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 30 Inpex 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 32 Saras 15.2 / 100 1.4 / 20 D 33 Qatar Petroleum 14.5 / 100 1.1 / 20 D 34 Varo Energy 12.4 / 100
    [Show full text]