(Lepidoptera) Inhabiting the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area, Wayne and Ashland Counties, Ohio1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Lepidoptera) Inhabiting the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area, Wayne and Ashland Counties, Ohio1 Survey of the Moths (Lepidoptera) Inhabiting the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area, Wayne and Ashland Counties, Ohio1 R. N. WILLIAMS, R. W. RINGS, M. S. ELLIS, AND D. S. FICKLE, Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691 ABSTRACT. In 1995, the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area was the subject of an ongoing series of insect surveys intended to establish benchmark information on arthropod diversity of wetlands in northeast Ohio. This article concentrates on the moths which were collected at ultraviolet light traps within the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area. A companion report will follow focusing on the Coleoptera along with several orders of aquatic insects. 3252 specimens were identified to 306 species in 19 families. These species are classified as follows: Abundant = 34; Locally Abundant = 1; Common = 257; Locally Common = 2; Uncommon = 10; Rare = 1; and Special Interest = 1. OHIO J. SCI. 97 (3): 34-39, 1997 INTRODUCTION Army Corps of Engineers. All the land behind the dam, The Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area was founded in 1991 below an elevation of 294 m, is under flood easement. with the initial purchase of land. The fact that this Wild- As a result, 3560 ha, including the Funk Bottoms Wildlife life Area is so new only magnifies the importance of Area, make up this wetland. There is relatively little area understanding the species existing there and what effect (around 80 ha) of permanently wet soils (marsh) within environmental changes might have upon them. This the easement area. However, hundreds to thousands of Wildlife Area currently consists of 467 ha which will be hectares may be inundated for periods of days to several expanded as funds and lands become available. It is lo- months at any time of the year depending on rainfall cated approximately 13 km west-southwest of Wooster and the need to control down stream flooding within the and lies between Blachleyville (Wayne County) and Watershed District. Most of the private lands in this Lake Fork (Ashland County), Ohio, bisected by State region consist of row crops, pasture or woodlots. Route 95. This report concentrates on the moths which were In 1995, the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area was the sub- collected at ultraviolet light traps. Another report will ject of an ongoing series of insect surveys intended to follow focusing on the Coleoptera and aquatic insects establish benchmark information on diversity of wet- from several orders. lands in northeast Ohio. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), Division of Wildlife chose this area MATERIALS AND METHODS because of its quality wetland habitat and the associated Two sites were selected within the main section of wildlife species found here. A variety of nesting and the current Wildlife Area, just southeast of Funk, off migrant birds occupy this area. The first recorded nest- State Route 95. The first site is located adjacent to a house ing of the state-endangered sandhill crane in over 60 on the area headquarters within a rather steep-sloping years was confirmed in the area in 1988. The insects of woodlot facing the wetland. This site, designated "House" the Funk Bottoms have never been studied, and because in our collections, is approximately 3 m higher in eleva- insects are the most abundant of all animals, this project tion than a nearby flood easement marker. The wooded is important as this area begins to revert back to a wet- House site is near a large barn, a natural spring which land. During 1993 and 1994, similar surveys were con- feeds an adjacent 0.6 ha pond, and is bordered by a ducted in the Killbuck Marsh Wildlife Area (Williams et al. large, maintained turf area (yard), and an adjacent pas- 1994, 1995). As a result, nearly 1,000 insect species were ture. The second site, called "Ditch", is surrounded by collected, identified by specialists, and catalogued for wetland and, in recent years, was flooded throughout future reference. the winter months and early spring, depending on the The Wildlife Area consists of moderately rolling Mohicanville Dam water level. The Ditch site is next to topography within the Muskingum Watershed Con- the Kiser Ditch, a permanent, dredged, slow-flowing, servancy District in the glaciated central hills region of shallow waterway which drains into the Muddy Fork of central Ohio. Most of the wildlife area is periodically- the Lake Fork of the Mohican River. These two sites re- flooded, moist soil meadows, and bottomland hard- present a broad range of ecological niches and should woods. Area flooding is controlled by the Mohicanville yield the greatest diversity of this relatively small wetland. "Dry" Dam, built in 1936, and maintained by the U. S. Two sets of blacklight traps were used throughout this survey. One light trap was set out at each site (House 'Manuscript received 3 February 1997 and in revised form 20 May and Ditch) on April 12, 1995, and collections were made 1997 (#97-03). weekly through November 6, 1995, when they were OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE R. N. WILLIAMS, ET AL. 35 removed. Each week the light trap batteries were re- 3 to 10 specimens collected annually. If only 1 or 2 charged and engaged in the late afternoon for an specimens are collected annually, the species is desig- overnight run, and trapped specimens were collected nated "Rare." Special Interest species may be local, very the following morning. A Vapona strip and a small, slow rare, or Ohio is on the extreme edge of its natural, release vial of chloroform were used as killing agents to geographic range making it vulnerable to identifiable prevent large insects such as May beetles (Phyllophagd) threats. and strong moths from destroying fragile specimens. Upon removal, insects were frozen until they could be RESULTS AND DISCUSSION separated and identified. A total of 3252 specimens was collected in 1995 For the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area, the moth species which has been identified to 306 species in 19 families. were classified within derived categories of abundance. All moth species identified are listed in Table 1. The 306 The categories include: "Abundant" designates species moth species collected from the Funk Bottoms in 1995 where annual collections exceed 50 specimens; "Locally are classified as follows: Abundant = 34; Locally Abun- Abundant" indicates only certain localities; "Common" dant = 1; Common = 257; Locally Common = 2; Uncommon designates annual collections of more than 11 speci- = 10; Rare = 1; and Special Interest = 1. These categorizations mens; "Locally Common" indicates only certain localities; are listed below each species as well as their respective "Uncommon" is used to describe species represented by Moths of North America (MONA) number and collection Table 1 A list of the Lepidoptera captured in the Funk Bottoms Wildlife Area in 1995} APATELODIDAE Crambus leachellus (Zinck) C, 7146, 05/24 - 10/23/95 Apatelodes torrefacta (J. E. Smith) C, 5357, 05/07/95 Hydriomena transfigurata Swett C, 7663, 07/12/95 Crambus saltuellus Zeller C, 7237, 05/07 - 05/24/95 C, 5363, 05/07/95 Hypagyrtis unipunctata (Haworth) ARCTIIDAE Pediasia trisecta (Walker) C, 6654, 05/07 - 06/21/95 Apantesis phalerata (Harris) C, 5413, 07/27 - 08/30/95 Iridopsis larvaria (Guenee) C, 8169, 05/07 - 09/20/95 C, 6588, 05/24 - 07/27/95 Cisseps fulvicollis (Hiibner) DREPANIDAE Itame coortaria (Hulst) A, 8267, 06/25 - 10/23/95 Oreta rosea (Walker) A, 6299, 06/21/95 Cycnia tenera Hiibner C, 6255, 06/21 - 07/27/95 Itame pustularia (Guenee) C, 8230, 06/21 - 08/30/95 C, 6273, 07/27/95 Estigmene acrea (Drury) GEOMETRIDAE Itame subcessaria (Walker) C, 8131, 05/17 - 07/27/95 Anavitrinella pampinaria (Guenee) C, 6303, 07/19/95 Euchaetes egle (Drury) C, 6590, 05/07 - 08/09/95 Lambdina fervidaria athasaria (Walker) C, 8238, 07/12 - 07/19/95 Antepione thisoaria (Guenee) C, 6894, 05/24/95 Grammia virgo (L.) C, 6987, 05/24/95 Lytrosis unitaria (Herrich-Schaffer) C, 8197, 07/27/95 Anticlea vasiliata Guenee C, 6720, 07/05/95 Halysidota tessellaris (J. E. Smith) C, 7329, 05/17/95 Melanolophia canadaria (Guenee) A, 8203, 06/21 - 07/27/95 Besma quercivoraria (Guenee) C, 6620, 05/17 - 08/30/95 Haploa confusa (Lyman) C, 6885, 05/31/95 Mellilla xanthometata (Walker) C, 8112, 07/12 - 07/19/95 Biston betularia cognataria (Guenee) C, 6322, 07/12 - 08/30/95 Haploa lecontei (Guerin-Meneville) C, 6640, 08/09/95 Metarranthis hypochraria (Herrich-Schaffer) C, 8111, 07/12 - 07/27/95 Calothysanis amaturaria (Walker) C, 6826, 05/07 - 05/24/95 Hyphantria cunea (Drury) C, 7147, 07/27 - 08/30/95 Nemoria bistriaria Hubner A, 8140, 05/07 - 08/30/95 Campaea perlata (Guenee) C, 7046, 07/19 - 09/20/95 Hypoprepia fucosa Hubner C, 6796, 06/21 - 09/20/95 Nemoria mimosaria (Guenee) C, 8090, 07/27/95 Coryphista meadii (Packard) C, 7048, 05/31/95 Lophocampa caryae Harris U, 7290, 05/24/95 Orthonama obstipata (F.) C, 8211, 05/07 - 05/31/95 Costaconvexa centrostrigaria (Wollaston) C, 7414, 09/20/95 Phragmatobia fuliginosa rubricosa (Harris) C, 7416, 05/17 - 08/09/95 Pero honestaria (Walker) C, 8156, 07/19 - 08/30/95 Ecliptopera atricolorata (Grote & Robinson) C, 6753, 05/17 - 08/09/95 Pyrrharctia Isabella (J. E. Smith) U, 7214, 07/19/95 Pero hubneraria (Guenee) C, 8129, 08/30/95 Ennomos magnaria Guenee C, 6754, 05/07 - 07/19/95 Spilosoma latipennis Stretch C, 6797,10/16/95 Plagodis alcoolaria (Guenee) C, 8133, 06/21/95 Euchlaena johnsonaria (Fitch) C, 6844, 05/31 - 07/27/95 Spilosoma virginica (Fabricius) C, 6729, 06/21/95 Plagodis serinaria Herrich-Schaffer A, 8137, 05/07 - 10/23/95 Eulithis diversilineata (Hubner) C, 6840, 05/31/95 C, 7196, 09/20 - 10/23/95 Pleuroprucha insulsaria (Guenee) CRAMBIDAE Eupithecia miserulata Grote A, 7132, 10/23/95 Chrysoteuchia topiaria (Zeller) C, 7474, 08/23 - 08/30/95 Probole alienaria nyssaria (Guenee) C, 5391, 06/21 - 07/12/95 Eusarca confusaria Hubner C, 6837.1, 05/07/95 Crambus agitatellus Clemens C, 6941, 07/12 - 08/30/95 Probole amicaria (Herrich-Schaffer) C, 5362, 06/21 - 07/19/95 Haematopis grataria (F.) C, 6838, 05/31/95 36 MOTHS OF THE FUNK BOTTOMS VOL.
Recommended publications
  • Elderberry and Elderflower Sambucus( Spp.): a Cultivation Guide for Florida1 David Jarnagin, Ali Sarkhosh, Juanita Popenoe, Steve Sargent, and Kevin Athearn2
    HS1390 Elderberry and Elderflower (Sambucus spp.): A Cultivation Guide for Florida1 David Jarnagin, Ali Sarkhosh, Juanita Popenoe, Steve Sargent, and Kevin Athearn2 Elderberry, Sambucus spp., has long been cultivated or Pushes for commercial cultivation were initiated in various collected from the wild by humans for both food and regions of North America in the 1920s and again in the medicine. Europeans have used the flowers and fruit 1960s, but the most recent iteration of commercial cultiva- of Sambucus nigra for thousands of years, while Native tion over the last 10 to 15 years has outpaced the previous Americans and European immigrants used Sambucus nigra attempts considerably. The high levels of antioxidants and ssp. canadensis, native to the New World (Figure 1). health benefits of the fruit have created new demand for the fruit and flowers, and this new demand may provide an alternative crop opportunity for Florida growers with many value-added possibilities. A native species grows wild throughout Florida, indicating that this may be a perennial crop that can be sustainably grown on marginal land. However, the native Florida plants have many drawbacks compared to the more commonly cultivated forms originating from farther north, and these drawbacks are Figure 1. Elderberry and elderflower cymes. an important consideration for proper establishment on a Credits: Hyldemoer + Co., Florida commercial scale. The fruit and flowers of the elder are used for wine, preserves, tinctures, teas, brewing and distilled The purpose of this paper is to provide information on spirits, and dyes for both food and textiles. The anthocya- growing American elderberry in Florida as an alternative nins in the fruit have been found to have higher antioxidant crop for commercial growers as well as homeowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Contents
    THE NEWSJOURNAL OF THE TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION VOLUME 8, NUMBER 2 JANUARY 2003 Contents Vol. 8, No. 2 Jan. 2003 Mission Statement The Toronto Entomologists’ Association (TEA) is a non-profit educational and scientific organization formed to promote Announcements ...................................................................................................................... 21 interest in insects, to encourage co-operation Upcoming Meetings ............................................................................................................... 22 among amateur and professional Recent News submitted by Don Davis ................................................................................... 24 entomologists, to educate and inform non- entomologists about insects, entomology and Meeting Reports ..................................................................................................................... 25 related fields, to aid in the preservation of Rediscovery of the Lake Huron Locust in Ontario by Steve Marshall .............................. 26 insects and their habitats and to issue publications in support of these objectives. The Bookworm ....................................................................................................................... 27 Executive Officers: Weaving an Ant's Tail by Lydia Attard ................................................................................ 28 President Nancy van der Poorten 2002 Presqu'ile Butterfly Blitz by Philip Careless .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elderberry: Botany, Horticulture, Potential
    4 Elderberry: Botany, Horticulture, Potential Denis Charlebois Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Horticultural Research and Development Centre 430 Gouin Boulevard Saint-Iean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, J3B 3E6 Canada Patrick 1. Byers Cooperative Extension Service University of Missouri Springfield, MO 65802 Chad E. Finn Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 3420 NW Orchard Avenue Corvallis, OR 97330 Andrew1. Thomas Southwest Research Center University of Missouri 14548 Highway H Mt. Vernon, MO 65712 1. INTRODUCTION II. BOTANY A. Taxonomy B. Distribution 1. Sambucus canadensis 2. Sambucus nigra Horticultural Reviews, Volume 37 Edited by Jules Janick Copyright © 2010Wiley-Blackwell. 213 214 D. CHARLEBOIS, P. 1. BYERS, C. E. FINN, AND A. 1. THOMAS 4. ELDERBERRY: BOTANY, HORTICULTURE, POTENTIAL 215 C. Habitat 3. Fruit D. Morphology 4. Antiviral and Antimicrobial Properties E. Reproductive Biology 5. Anthocyanins and Antioxidant Capacity 1. Pollination F. Ecological Value and Ornamental Potential 2. Fruit Ripening G. Markets and Production Costs F. Plant Development H. Processing III. HORTICULTURE VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS A. Winter Hardiness LITERATURE CITED 1. Sambucus canadensis 2. Sambucus nigra B. Site Selection and Preparation 1. Soil Preference I. INTRODUCTION 2. Site Preparation 3. Irrigation The elderberry or elder (Sambucus spp.), in production or growing wild C. Orchard Establishment in the northernhemisphere, mayhave the widestrange of applications of D. Fertilization and Mycorrhizae all small fruits. Members of the genus Sambucus have a multitude of E. Pruning 1. Maintenance uses, including riverbank stabilization and windbreaks (Paquet and 2. Rejuvenation Jutras 1996); wildlife food and refuge; ornamental, crafts, and games; 3. Corrective versatile human food source, and multipurpose medicinal (Valles F.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acronicta Rubticoma Guenee. Black Light; Lakehurst, June 4. Acronicta Dactylina Grote, Melanic Form
    VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1 3 NOcruIDAE Acronicta rubTicoma Guenee. Black light; Lakehurst, June 4. Acronicta dactylina Grote, melanic form. Black light; Lebanon, June 27. A new record for the State. Eurois occulta Linnaeus. Black light; Montague, August 27. Oncocnemis saundersiana Grote. Black light; Lebanon, October 28. Agrotis buchholzi Barnes & Benjamin. Black light, Lakehurst, June 4. Eupsilia morrisoni Grote. Black light; Lebanon, November 18 and 23. Neperigea costa Barnes & Benjamin. Black light; Montague, July 27. A new record for the State. Magusa orbifera, "divaricata" Grote. Black light, Lebanon, August 21. Amolita roseola Smith. Black light; Montague, July 30. A new record for the State. Abrostola urentis Guenee. Black light; Montague, October 10. Catocala maestosa Hulst. Bait trap; Lebanon, August 28. A new record for the State. Zale phaeocapna Franclemont. Black light; Lebanon, April 27. Deter­ mined by genitalic dissection. A new record for the State. Zale metatoides McDunnough. Black light; Montague, June 10. A new record for the State. Gabara pulverosalis Walker. Black light; Lakehurst August 14. A new record for the State. Rivula propinqaZis Guenee. Black light; Lebanon, October 28. I wish to thank C. F. dos Passos and A. E. Brower for determining some of the specimens. A NEW SUBSPECIES OF BREPHIDIUM EXILIS FROM YUCATAN (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) HARTIY K. CLENCH Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 Some years ago Eduardo C. Welling, of Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, sent me a few specimens of a Brephidium he had taken on the north coast of Yucatan. It was obvious, as soon as they had been examined genitalically, that they represented exilis Boisduval, but they belonged to 4 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]