DOCSLIB.ORG

Space, Image and Display in Russian Central Asia, 1881

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space, Image and Display in Russian Central Asia, 1881 SPACE, IMAGE AND DISPLAY IN RUSSIAN CENTRAL ASIA, 1881-1914 Jennifer Mary Keating UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Declaration I, Jennifer Mary Keating, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. ---------------------------------- --------------------------------- 2 Abstract This thesis investigates the relationship between environment and empire in late tsarist Central Asia, and suggests that the making and unmaking of space was integral to the imperial experience. It contends that land and its representation were crucial to processes undertaken on local and imperial scales to re-fashion parts of Central Asia from a ‘vast’, ‘alien’ and ‘inhospitable’ colony into an integrated frontier of empire. In examining the environment as a site for the physical enactment and negotiation of Russian rule, the chapters investigate how imperial settlers interacted with the region’s built and natural landscapes, through the planning of transport routes, the creation of settlements, irrigation, afforestation and planting projects. I use visual sources as the project’s access points into the Russian spatial imaginary: vital interfaces between material and metaphorical space that documented the changing environment but were also used to project future ambitions, to inscribe meaning, and to appropriate, segregate, contest and re- order terrain. Environment, image and the spatial imagination were entwined in a symbiotic relationship, with attempts to modify Central Asia’s landscapes, and the visual representations of these actions, revealing that the concept of Turkestan as a monolithic colonial space underwent significant fragmentation. The physical and imaginative transformation of terrain gave rise to new characterisations of the region as a modern, connected, innovative and fertile site, notions that were debated and disputed by a variety of state and sub-state actors in Central Asia and the imperial centre. I argue that the public circulation of images speaks to the importance of the environment as a visual component in the legitimisation of Russia’s presence on Central Asian soil, and as a key arena for the evolution of local and imperial spatial identities, some of which threatened to precipitate the eventual dissolution of the Turkestan Governor Generalship. 3 Contents Declaration .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Contents ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7 A note on dates and transliteration ................................................................................................................................. 9 Figures and tables ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 The study in overview ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Colonialism, Orientalism and Central Asia ............................................................................................... 14 Space, landscape and environment ............................................................................................................. 18 Image, display and visuality ........................................................................................................................... 22 Sources and structure ....................................................................................................................................... 26 1. The dimensions of space to 1881 .............................................................................................................................. 32 Founding Turkestan: Conquest, administration, geography ........................................................... 35 Making imperial space: The Kaufman era ................................................................................................ 39 Space as image under Kaufman .................................................................................................................... 45 1881 and beyond ................................................................................................................................................. 55 2. Routes .................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 A link to ‘civilisation’ .......................................................................................................................................... 63 Rails, rivers and the bridge to Asia .............................................................................................................. 70 Rethinking isolation ........................................................................................................................................... 79 3. Built oases ........................................................................................................................................................................... 85 Travel and images ............................................................................................................................................... 87 Demography, settlement and the divided city ....................................................................................... 90 Critiquing ‘heaven on earth’ ........................................................................................................................ 100 4. Desert, garden, field ..................................................................................................................................................... 108 Barren landscapes ............................................................................................................................................ 113 ‘Ozelenenie’ and the garden city ................................................................................................................ 118 Lands of plenty? ................................................................................................................................................ 124 5. Models and experiments ............................................................................................................................................ 135 The Murgab Estate as model ....................................................................................................................... 138 Display and decline .......................................................................................................................................... 148 4 Singular stories, multiple sites ................................................................................................................... 153 6. Exhibiting Turkestan ................................................................................................................................................... 159 Turkestan as commodity frontier ............................................................................................................. 163 Local exhibitions and their organisers ................................................................................................... 167 Participation and the social body .............................................................................................................. 174 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................................. 184 Selected bibliography ....................................................................................................................................................... 193 Archival sources ................................................................................................................................................ 193 Visual material not contained within archives or printed publications .................................. 194 Newspapers and periodicals ....................................................................................................................... 194 Published primary sources .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan
    Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of Kashmir in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy (M. Phil) In History By Farooq Ahmad Rather Under the Supervision of Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey CENTRE OF CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES University of Kashmir, Srinagar- 190006 JAMMU AND KASHMIR, INDIA September, 2012 Centre of Central Asian Studies University of Kashmir, Srinagar “A” Grade NAAC Accredited CERTIFICATE Certified that the thesis entitled “Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan” submitted by Farooq Ahmad Rather for the Degree of M. Phil in the discipline of History is an original piece of research work. This work has not been submitted fully or partially so far anywhere for the award of any degree. The scholar worked under my supervision on whole time basis for the period required under statues and has put in the required attendance in the Centre. Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey (Supervisor) Countersigned (Prof. G. R. Jan) Director Declaration I solemnly declare that the Dissertation entitled “Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan” submitted by me in the discipline of History under the supervision of Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey embodies my own contribution. This work, which does not contain piracy, has not been submitted, so far, anywhere for the award of any degree. Dated Signature 5 October 2012 Farooq Ahmad Rather CCAS University of Kashmir, Srinagar CONTENTS Page No. Preface i Chapter-I Introduction 1
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OLD ELITES UNDER COMMUNISM: SOVIET RULE IN LENINOBOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY FLORA J. ROBERTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................. ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One. Noble Allies of the Revolution: Classroom to Battleground (1916-1922) . 43 Chapter Two. Class Warfare: the Old Boi Network Challenged (1925-1930) ............... 105 Chapter Three. The Culture of Cotton Farms (1930s-1960s) ......................................... 170 Chapter Four. Purging the Elite: Politics and Lineage (1933-38) .................................. 224 Chapter Five. City on Paper: Writing Tajik in Stalinobod (1930-38) ............................ 282 Chapter Six. Islam and the Asilzodagon: Wartime and Postwar Leninobod .................. 352 Chapter Seven. The
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editorial Board
    https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2019.76.kazakh FROM THE EDITORIAL BOARD KAZAKH DIASPORA IN KYRGYZSTAN: HISTORY OF SETTLEMENT AND ETHNOGRAPHIC PECULIARITIES Bibiziya Kalshabayeva Professor, Department of History, Archeology and Ethnology Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Gulnara Dadabayeva Associate Professor, KIMEP University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Dauren Eskekbaev Associate Professor, Almaty University of Management Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Abstract: The article focuses on the most significant stages of the formation of the Kazakh diaspora in the Kyrgyz Republic, to point out what reasons contributed to the rugged Kazakh migration process in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and how it affected the forms and types of their settlements (compact or disperse). The researched issues also include the identification of factors provoked by humans and the state to launch these migrations. Surprisingly enough, opposite to the claims made by independent Kazakhstan leadership in the early 2000s, the number of Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan wishing to become repatriates to their native country is still far from the desired. Thus the article is an attempt to find out what reasons and factors influence the Kazakh residents’ desire to stay in the neighboring country as a minority. To provide the answer, the authors analyzed the dynamics of statistical variations in the number of migrants and the reasons of these changes. The other key point in tracing what characteristic features separate Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan and their kinsmen in Kazakhstan is the archival data, statistical, historical, and field sources, which provide a systematic overview of the largely unstudied pages of the history of the Kazakh diaspora.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of Tajikistan : National Identity and the Origins of the Republic
    THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN i THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN ii THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN For Suzanne Published in 2007 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States of America and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan a division of St. Martin's Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © Paul Bergne The right of Paul Bergne to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by the author in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. International Library of Central Asian Studies 1 ISBN: 978 1 84511 283 7 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: available Printed and bound in India by Replika Press Pvt. Ltd From camera-ready copy edited and supplied by the author THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN v CONTENTS Abbreviations vii Transliteration ix Acknowledgements xi Maps. Central Asia c 1929 xii Central Asia c 1919 xiv Introduction 1 1. Central Asian Identities before 1917 3 2. The Turkic Ascendancy 15 3. The Revolution and After 20 4. The Road to Soviet Power 28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Worrying Levels of HIV Prevalence in Blood Donations in Eastern Europe
    Worrying levels of HIV prevalence EuroTB and EuroHIV are supported by the European Commission (DG-SANCO) in blood donations in eastern Europe Giedrius Likatavicius 12, rue du Val d’Osne - 94415 St-Maurice Cedex - FRANCE Tél. : 33 (0)1 41 79 68 68 Fax : 33 (0)1 41 79 68 02 [email protected] Giedrius Likatavicius, Angela M. Downs, Françoise F. Hamers MoPeC3574 Institut de veille sanitaire, Saint-Maurice, France In the West, HIV prevalence among blood donations fell sharply during 1986-1988, from 18 to Background 8 per 100,000 donations, then decreased steadily to 1.4 in 2001 and is now very low: overall, 1.3 per 100 000 donations in 2002. However, levels of over 2 per 100 000 have been reported in almost all of the countries during the last 5 years: from Italy (between 2 and 5 per 100 000), Greece (5-7), Throughout Europe, blood donations are systematically screened for HIV antibodies and donations Portugal (10-18, but data are provided only from regional blood centres in three large cities and which test positive are eliminated from the blood supply. Nevertheless, a small residual risk of HIV do not represent the country as a whole) and Spain (4-7). infection through transfusion of undetected infected blood remains; the higher the incidence and thus the prevalence of HIV among blood donors, the higher the residual risk. Monitoring HIV prevalence Available data on donations from new and repeat donors (14 countries from the West and 5 from the among donations provides an indication of the relative safety of the blood supply between countries centre ) continue to show consistently higher (10 times) prevalence levels among new donors and and over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Ms. First Name FAMILY NAME Section Or Unit/Title/Position/Rank
    Mr. First Name FAMILY NAME Section or Unit/Title/Position/Rank Ms. DELEGATIONS ALBANIA Albania Mr. Alqiviadhi PULI Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Albania Mr. Spiro KOÇI Ambassador, Permanent Representative Albania Ms. Ravesa LLESHI Advisor Albania Mr. Glevin DERVISHI Advisor Albania Mr. Xhodi SAKIQI Counsellor GERMANY Germany Dr. Guido WESTERWELLE Minister Germany Mr. Rüdiger LÜDEKING Ambassador, Head of Permanent Mission to the OSCE Germany Mr. Juergen SCHULZ Deputy Political Director Germany Mr. Thomas OSSOWSKI Deputy Head of Minister’s Office Germany Mr. Martin SCHÄFER Deputy Federale Foreign Office Spokesperson Germany Mr. Thomas Eberhard SCHULTZE Head of OSCE Division Germany Ms. Christine WEIL Deputy Head of Permanent Mission to the OSCE Germany Mr. Hans-Henning PRADEL Senior Military Adviser Germany Mr. Steffen FEIGL Bagage Master Germany Mr. Bernd PFAFFENBACH Military Adviser Germany Ms. Heike JANTSCH Counsellor Germany Mr. Detlef HEMPEL Military Adviser Germany Mr. Holger LEUKERT Desk Officer Ministry of Defence Germany Ms. Anne DR. WAGNER-MITCHELL Counsellor Germany Mr. Jean P. FROEHLY Counsellor Germany Mr. Julian LÜBBERT First Secretary Germany Ms. Annette PÖLKING First Secretary Germany Mr. Anna SCHRÖDER First Secretary Germany Mr. Stephan FAGO Second Secretary Germany Ms. Anna-Elisabeth VOLLERT Assistant Attacheé Germany Mr. Sören HEINE Assistent Senior Military Adviser Germany Mr. Joerg Emil GAUDIAN Protocol desk officer Germany Mr. Bruno WOBBE Communication Germany Mr. Thomas KÖHLER Official Fotograph Germany Mr. Christof WEIL Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Germany Ms. Anka FELDHUSEN Minister Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission Germany Ms. Daniela BERGELT First Secretary Germany Mr. Christopher FUCHS First Secretary Germany Ms. Tanja BEYER First Secretary Germany Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Is Doing So on Behalf of an Affected Person Or Community, It Must Identify on Whose Behalf the Complaint Is Made
    (1) The complainant’s name(s), address, and other contact information. 1. Complainant No. 1. 2. Dmitry Tikhonov, [email protected] 3. Elena Urlaeva, [email protected] 4. Complainant No. 4. (2) If the party lodging the complaint is doing so on behalf of an affected person or community, it must identify on whose behalf the complaint is made. It must also present evidence that it has been requested to present the complaint on behalf of the project-affected people/person. As expressed in Appendix 1, “Statement by the applicant to the Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman for a compliance review of the International Finance Corporation project with Indorama Kokand Textile, project number 36098,” complainant No. 1 authorizes the Uzbek-German Forum for Human Rights and the International Labor Rights Forum to submit a complaint in this regard to the Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman. Complainants No. 2, 3, and 4, authorize the Uzbek-German Forum for Human Rights, International Labor Rights Forum, and Human Rights Watch to help in the preparation of the request for compliance review of the IFC project with Indorama Kokand Textile, project number 36098, and to communicate with the IFC and Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman in matters related to this request. All of the complainants grant their consent for the Uzbek-German Forum for Human Rights, International Labor Rights Forum, Human Rights Watch, and Cotton Campaign legal advisor Brian Campbell to communicate with the IFC and the Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman on our behalf. (3) Whether the complainant wishes that their identity or any information communicated as part of the complaint should be kept confidential (stating reasons).
    [Show full text]
  • Abashin, S.N., Arapov, D
    Abashin, S.N., Arapov, D. Yu. & Bekmakhanova, N.E. (ed.) & authorial collective Tsentral’naya Aziya v Sostave Rossiiskoi Imperii (Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie) 2008 464 pp.; 8 Appendices pp.339-424; Bibliography pp.425-32; glossary pp.433-8, Index of names pp.439-45; ISBN 978-5-86793-571-9 This useful and significant book is the latest in the Series Okrainy Rossiiskoi Imperii (Historia Rossica) whose general editors are Alexei Miller, Anatoly Remnev & Alfred Rieber. The authorial collective of S. N. Abashin, D. Yu. Arapov, N. E. Bekmakhanova, O. V. Boronin, O. I. Brusina, A. Yu. Bykov, D. V. Vasiliev, A. Sh. Kadyrbaev, T. V. Kotyukov, P. P. Litvinov, N. B. Narbaev & Zh. S. Syzdykova includes some of the finest of the first post-Soviet generation of Russian-language scholars working on the Islamic regions of the Empire, although the sheer number who have contributed inevitably leads to unevenness of tone and occasional contradictions. This book is an important milestone in the development of what can tentatively be called ‘postcolonial’ (or at any rate post- Imperial) Russian historiography. It aims to be a standard work of reference on the place of Central Asia (which here includes the territory of modern Kazakhstan) within the Russian Empire, and in purely factual terms it largely succeeds: there is as yet no equivalent of this volume in English, not least because much recent western scholarship on Central Asia has perhaps concentrated too much on applying the latest theoretical innovations to the study of Russian Imperialism without first laying the sort of empirical foundations this book provides.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conquest of Central Asia, 1780
    Introduction: Killing the 'Cotton Canard' and getting rid of the 'Great Game'. Rewriting the Russian conquest of Central Asia, 1814 – 1895 Alexander Morrison Nazarbayev University [email protected] ‘Они забыли дни тоски, Ночные возгласы: «К оружью», Унылые солончаки И поступь мерную верблюжью’ ‘They have forgotten days of melancholy, Forgot the night-time call ‘To arms’! Forgot the dismal salty steppe And the camel’s measured tread.’ Nikolai Gumilev Turkestanskie Generaly (1911) Russia’s expansion southwards across the Kazakh steppe into the riverine oases of Turkestan was one of the nineteenth century’s most rapid and dramatic examples of imperial conquest. With its main phases sandwiched between the British annexation of the Indian subcontinent between 1757 and 1849, and the ‘Scramble for Africa’ initiated by the British occupation of Egypt in 1881-2, roughly contemporaneous with the French conquest of Algeria, it has never been granted the same degree of historical attention as any of these. In general, as Dominic Lieven has observed (2006 I, 3), studies of the foreign policy of the Russian empire are few and far between, and those which exist tend to take a rather grand, sweeping view of events rather than examining particular episodes in detail (Fuller 1998; LeDonne 1997 & 2004). Whilst there are both classic and recent explorations of the ‘Eastern Question’ and the Russian conquest of the Caucasus (Anderson 1966; Bitis 2006; Baddeley 1908; Gammer 1994), and detailed studies in English of Russian expansion in the Far East (Quested 1968; Bassin 1999; Schimmelpenninck van der Oye 2001), the principal phases of the Russian conquest of Central Asia remain neglected and misunderstood.
    [Show full text]
  • ALPAMYSH Central Asian Identity Under Russian Rule
    ALPAMYSH Central Asian Identity under Russian Rule BY H. B. PAKSOY Association for the Advancement of Central Asian Research Monograph Series Hartford, Connecticut First AACAR Edition, 1989 --------- ALPAMYSH: Central Asian Identity under Russian Rule COPYRIGHT 1979, 1989 by H. B. PAKSOY All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Paksoy, H. B., 1948- ALPAMYSH: central Asian identity under Russian rule. (Association for the Advancement of Central Asian Research monograph series) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) Includes index. 1. Soviet Central Asia--History--Sources. 2. Alpamish. 3. Epic Literature, Turkic. 4. Soviet Central Asia--Politics and Government. I. Title. II. Series. DK847.P35 1989 958.4 89-81416 ISBN: 0-9621379-9-5 ISBN: 0-9621379-0-1 (pbk.) AACAR (Association for the Advancement of Central Asian Research) Monograph Series Editorial Board: Thomas Allsen (TRENTON STATE COLLEGE) (Secretary of the Board); Peter Golden (RUTGERS UNIVERSITY); Omeljan Pritsak (HARVARD UNIVERSITY); Thomas Noonan (UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA). AACAR is a non-profit, tax-exempt, publicly supported organization, as defined under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, incorporated in Hartford, Connecticut, headquartered at the Department of History, CCSU, 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT 06050. The Institutional Members of AACAR are: School of Arts and Sciences, CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY; Nationality and Siberian Studies Program, The W. Averell Harriman Institute for the Advanced Study of the Soviet Union, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY; Mir Ali Shir Navai Seminar for Central Asian Languages and Cultures, UCLA; Program for Turkish Studies, UCLA; THE CENTRAL ASIAN FOUNDATION, WISCONSIN; Committee on Inner Asian and Altaistic Studies, HARVARD UNIVERSITY; Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, INDIANA UNIVERSITY; Department of Russian and East European Studies, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA; THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, WASHINGTON D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivery Destinations
    Delivery Destinations 50 - 2,000 kg 2,001 - 3,000 kg 3,001 - 10,000 kg 10,000 - 24,000 kg over 24,000 kg (vol. 1 - 12 m3) (vol. 12 - 16 m3) (vol. 16 - 33 m3) (vol. 33 - 82 m3) (vol. 83 m3 and above) District Province/States Andijan region Andijan district Andijan region Asaka district Andijan region Balikchi district Andijan region Bulokboshi district Andijan region Buz district Andijan region Djalakuduk district Andijan region Izoboksan district Andijan region Korasuv city Andijan region Markhamat district Andijan region Oltinkul district Andijan region Pakhtaobod district Andijan region Khdjaobod district Andijan region Ulugnor district Andijan region Shakhrikhon district Andijan region Kurgontepa district Andijan region Andijan City Andijan region Khanabad City Bukhara region Bukhara district Bukhara region Vobkent district Bukhara region Jandar district Bukhara region Kagan district Bukhara region Olot district Bukhara region Peshkul district Bukhara region Romitan district Bukhara region Shofirkhon district Bukhara region Qoraqul district Bukhara region Gijduvan district Bukhara region Qoravul bazar district Bukhara region Kagan City Bukhara region Bukhara City Jizzakh region Arnasoy district Jizzakh region Bakhmal district Jizzakh region Galloaral district Jizzakh region Sh. Rashidov district Jizzakh region Dostlik district Jizzakh region Zomin district Jizzakh region Mirzachul district Jizzakh region Zafarabad district Jizzakh region Pakhtakor district Jizzakh region Forish district Jizzakh region Yangiabad district Jizzakh region
    [Show full text]