DOCSLIB.ORG

PSNH, Merrimack Station, NH0001465

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PSNH, Merrimack Station, NH0001465 NUREG-1437 Supplement 30 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 30 Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Draft Report for Comment U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, DC 20555-0001 AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material Non-NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room at books, journal articles, and transactions, Federal http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Register notices, Federal and State legislation, and Publicly released records include, to name a few, congressional reports. Such documents as theses, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and non-NRC conference proceedings may be purchased correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal from their sponsoring organization. memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their attachments. Copies of industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC maintained at— regulations, and Title 10, Energy, in the Code of The NRC Technical Library Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one Two White Flint North of these two sources. 11545 Rockville Pike 1. The Superintendent of Documents Rockville, MD 20852–2738 U.S. Government Printing Office Mail Stop SSOP Washington, DC 20402–0001 These standards are available in the library for Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov reference use by the public. Codes and standards are Telephone: 202-512-1800 usually copyrighted and may be purchased from the Fax: 202-512-2250 originating organization or, if they are American 2. The National Technical Information Service National Standards, from— Springfield, VA 22161–0002 American National Standards Institute www.ntis.gov 11 West 42nd Street 1–800–553–6847 or, locally, 703–605–6000 New York, NY 10036–8002 www.ansi.org A single copy of each NRC draft report for comment is 212–642–4900 available free, to the extent of supply, upon written request as follows: Address: Office of Administration, Printing and Mail Services Branch Legally binding regulatory requirements are stated U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission only in laws; NRC regulations; licenses, including Washington, DC 20555-0001 technical specifications; or orders, not in NUREG-series publications. The views expressed E-mail: [email protected] in contractor-prepared publications in this series are Facsimile: 301–415–2289 not necessarily those of the NRC. Some publications in the NUREG series that are The NUREG series comprises (1) technical and posted at NRC’s Web site address administrative reports and books prepared by the http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs staff (NUREG–XXXX) or agency contractors are updated periodically and may differ from the last (NUREG/CR–XXXX), (2) proceedings of printed version. Although references to material found conferences (NUREG/CP–XXXX), (3) reports on a Web site bear the date the material was accessed, resulting from international agreements the material available on the date cited may (NUREG/IA–XXXX), (4) brochures subsequently be removed from the site. (NUREG/BR–XXXX), and (5) compilations of legal decisions and orders of the Commission and Atomic and Safety Licensing Boards and of Directors’ decisions under Section 2.206 of NRC’s regulations (NUREG–0750). COMMENTS ON DRAFT REPORT Any interested party may submit comments on this report for consideration by the NRC staff. Comments may be accompanied by additional relevant information or supporting data. Please specify the report number NUREG-1437, Supplement 30, draft, in your comments, and send them by March 7, 2007, to the following address: Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T6-D59 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Electronic comments may be submitted to the NRC by the Internet at [email protected]. For any questions about the material in this report, please contact: R. Emch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Phone: 301-415-1590 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract 2 3 4 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) considered the environmental impacts of 5 renewing nuclear power plant operating licenses (OLs) for a 20-year period in its Generic 6 Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (GEIS), NUREG-1437, 7 Volumes 1 and 2, and codified the results in Title 10, Part 51, of the Code of Federal 8 Regulations (10 CFR Part 51). In the GEIS (and its Addendum 1), the NRC staff identifies 9 92 environmental issues and reaches generic conclusions related to environmental impacts for 10 69 of these issues that apply to all plants or to plants with specific design or site characteristics. 11 Additional plant-specific review is required for the remaining 23 issues. These plant-specific 12 reviews are to be included in a supplement to the GEIS. 13 14 This draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) has been prepared in 15 response to an application submitted to the NRC by Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and 16 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), to renew the OL for Vermont Yankee Nuclear 17 Power Station (VYNPS) for an additional 20 years under 10 CFR Part 54. This draft SEIS 18 includes the NRC staff’s analysis that considers and weighs the environmental impacts of the 19 proposed action, the environmental impacts of alternatives to the proposed action, and 20 mitigation measures available for reducing or avoiding adverse impacts. It also includes the 21 NRC staff’s preliminary recommendation regarding the proposed action. 22 23 Regarding the 69 issues for which the GEIS reached generic conclusions, neither Entergy nor 24 the NRC staff has identified information that is both new and significant for any issue that 25 applies to VYNPS. In addition, the NRC staff determined that information provided during the 26 scoping process did not call into question the conclusions in the GEIS. Therefore, the NRC 27 staff concludes that the impacts of renewing the VYNPS OL would not be greater than the 28 impacts identified for these issues in the GEIS. For each of these issues, the NRC staff’s 29 conclusion in the GEIS is that the impact is of SMALL(a) significance (except for collective offsite 30 radiological impacts from the fuel cycle and high-level waste and spent fuel, which were not 31 assigned a single significance level). 32 33 Regarding the remaining 23 issues, those that apply to VYNPS are addressed in this draft SEIS. 34 For each applicable issue, the NRC staff concludes that the significance of the potential 35 environmental impacts of renewal of the OL is SMALL. The NRC staff also concludes that no 36 additional mitigation is warranted. However, under the provisions of the Clean Water Act 316(b) 37 Phase II regulations, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation may impose 38 further restrictions or require modifications to the cooling system to reduce the impacts on (a) Environmental effects are not detectable or are so minor that they will neither destabilize nor noticeably alter any important attribute of the resource. December 2006 iii Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 30 Abstract 1 aquatic resources from entrainment and impingement. The NRC staff determined that 2 information provided during the scoping process did not identify any new issue that has a 3 significant environmental impact. 4 5 The NRC staff’s preliminary recommendation is that the Commission determine that the adverse 6 environmental impacts of license renewal for VYNPS are not so great that preserving the option 7 of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. This 8 recommendation is based on (1) the analysis and findings in the GEIS; (2) the Environmental 9 Report submitted by Entergy; (3) consultation with Federal, State, and local agencies; (4) the 10 NRC staff’s own independent review; and (5) the NRC staff’s consideration of public comments 11 received during the scoping process. 12 Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 30 iv December 2006 1 Contents 2 3 4 Abstract ............................................................... iii 5 6 Executive Summary...................................................... xv 7 8 Abbreviations/Acronyms................................................... xx 9 10 1.0 Introduction ........................................................ 1-1 11 12 1.1 Report Contents ................................................. 1-1 13 1.2 Background .................................................... 1-3 14 15 1.2.1 Generic Environmental Impact Statement ....................... 1-3 16 1.2.2 License Renewal Evaluation Process .......................... 1-5 17 18 1.3 The Proposed Federal Action ....................................... 1-8 19 1.4 The Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ........................ 1-8 20 1.5 Compliance and Consultations ...................................... 1-9 21 1.6 References..................................................... 1-9 22 23 2.0 Description of Nuclear Power Plant and Site and Plant Interaction 24 with the Environment.................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscaping at the Water's Edge
    LANDSCAPING/GARDENING/ECOLOGY No matter where you live in New Hampshire, the actions you take in your landscape can have far-reaching effects on water quality. Why? Because we are all connected to the water cycle and we all live in a watershed. A watershed is the LANDSCAPING land area that drains into a surface water body such as a lake, river, wetland or coastal estuary. at the Water’sAN ECOLOGICAL APPROACHEdge LANDSCAPING Landscaping at the Water’s Edge is a valuable resource for anyone concerned with the impact of his or her actions on the environment. This book brings together the collective expertise of many UNH Cooperative Extension specialists and educators and an independent landscape designer. Unlike many garden design books that are full of glitz and glamour but sorely lacking in substance, this affordable book addresses important ecological issues and empowers readers by giving an array of workable at the Water’s Edge solutions for real-world situations. ~Robin Sweetser, Concord Monitor columnist, garden writer for Old Farmer’s Almanac, and NH Home Magazine Landscaping at the Water’s Edge provides hands-on tools that teach us about positive change. It’s an excellent resource for the gardener, the professional landscaper, designer, and landscape architect—to learn how to better dovetail our landscapes with those of nature. ~Jon Batson, President, NH Landscape Association Pictured here are the : A major river watersheds in N ECOLOGICAL APPROACH New Hampshire. This guide explains how our landscaping choices impact surface and ground waters and demonstrates how, with simple observation, ecologically based design, and low impact maintenance practices, you can protect, and even improve, the quality of our water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Riverriver
    Reviving River Yamuna An Actionable Blue Print for a BLUEBLUE RIVERRIVER Edited by PEACE Institute Charitable Trust H.S. Panwar 2009 Reviving River Yamuna An Actionable Blue Print for a BLUE RIVER Edited by H.S. Panwar PEACE Institute Charitable Trust 2009 contents ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... v PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1 Fact File of Yamuna ................................................................................................. 9 A report by CHAPTER 2 Diversion and over Abstraction of Water from the River .............................. 15 PEACE Institute Charitable Trust CHAPTER 3 Unbridled Pollution ................................................................................................ 25 CHAPTER 4 Rampant Encroachment in Flood Plains ............................................................ 29 CHAPTER 5 There is Hope for Yamuna – An Actionable Blue Print for Revival ............ 33 This report is one of the outputs from the Ford Foundation sponsored project titled CHAPTER 6 Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan - An Example of Civil Society Action .......................... 39 Mainstreaming the river as a popular civil action ‘cause’ through “motivating actions for the revival of the people – river close links as a precursor to citizen’s mandated actions for the revival
    [Show full text]
  • TAILINGS DAM BREACH ASSESSMENT Knight Piésold
    IDM MINING LTD. RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT TAILINGS DAM BREACH ASSESSMENT PREPARED FOR: IDM Mining Ltd. 1500 – 409 Granville Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada, V6C 1T2 PREPARED BY: Knight Piésold Ltd. Suite 1400 – 750 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2T8 Canada p. +1.604.685.0543 • f. +1.604.685.0147 Knight Piésold VA101-594/4-6 Rev 0 C O N S U L T I N G June 16, 2017 www.knightpiesold.com IDM MINING LTD. RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT TAILINGS DAM BREACH ASSESSMENT VA101-594/4-6 Rev Description Date 0 Issued in Final June 16, 2017 Knight Piésold Ltd. Suite 1400 750 West Pender Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6C 2T8 Telephone: (604) 685-0543 Facsimile: (604) 685-0147 www.knightpiesold.com IDM MINING LTD. RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A tailings dam breach assessment for the Bromley Humps Tailings Management Facility (TMF) was conducted for the Red Mountain Underground Gold Project. The dam breach study presented herein is not a risk assessment and ignores the likelihood of occurrence of a breach. The purpose of the study was to generate inundation maps that are used for evaluating the downstream incremental impacts to population at risk (PAR) and potential loss of life, to environmental and cultural values (including consequences to wildlife and commercial, recreational, and aboriginal (CRA) fisheries), and to infrastructure and economics (CDA 2014). This report also supports the assessment of the “breach or failure of tailings dam or other containment structure” as identified in Section 9 – Accidents and Malfunctions of The Application Information Requirements for the Project (EAO 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Dimensions and Hydrologic Effects of Beaver Ponds on Kuiu Island in Southeast Alaska
    Physical Dimensions and Hydrologic Effects of Beaver Ponds on Kuiu Island in Southeast Alaska by David Beedle A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science Completed August 28, 1991 Coimnenceinent June 1992 APPROVED: Professor of Forest Engineering in charge of major Head of department of Forest Engineering Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented August 28. 1991 Typed by David L. Beedle AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF David L. Beedle for the degree ofMaster of Science in Forest Engineeringpresented onAugust 28, 1991 Title: Physical Dimensions and Hydrologic Effects of Beaver Ponds on Kuiu Island in Southeast Alaska Abstract approved: Robert L. Beschta Dimensional characteristics of 44 beaver dams and ponds on Kuiu Island in Southeast Alaska were determined to evaluate the hydrologic effects of these structureson peak flows. The study area consisted of low gradient, incised streams in broad U-shaped valleys. Pond routing simulations were conducted using four return intervals (2-, 10-, 25-, and 50-year) and seven watershed sizes through medium- (752 m2 of surface area) and large-sized (6002 m2) beaver ponds. The annual precipitation during field data collection was below normal resulting in a need to estimate winter pond conditions from summertime measurements. The average dam length and height was 32 m and 0.7 in, respectively. The average winter pond surface area and volume was 2,140 m2 and 1,250 m3, respectively. Pond volume was significantly related (p = 0.05) to surface area (r2= 0.91). Dam and pond dimensions were influenced by local stream and landscape characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Master Plan 2012 CITY of ST
    August 2012 Stormwater Master Plan 2012 CITY OF ST. PETERS, MISSOURI BLACK AND VEATCH PATTI BANKS ASSOCIATES City of St. Peters Stormwater Master Plan 2012, FINAL Report Summary This Stormwater Master Plan will be used for planning of future capital improvements, improving water quality, and continuing compliance with Missouri Department of Natural Resources Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MDNR MS4) regulations. Preliminary investigations have evaluated the existing conditions of the City’s open-channel stormwater infrastructure based on hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, field reconnaissance, water quality modeling, and review of relevant policies at the City, State, and Federal levels. The City of St. Peters has a population of approximately 57,000 and encompasses about 22 square miles. The City owns, operates and maintains over 165 miles of storm sewer pipe and associated structures, as well as 3 pump stations. The City contains more than 47 miles of waterway, 55 stream/roadway crossings, 43 wet retention basins and 207 dry detention basins. The majority of the City is situated in the Dardenne Creek Watershed, a 29 mile long basin that covers approximately the middle third of St. Charles County and drains to the Mississippi River. The primary subwatershed in St. Peters is Spencer Creek. Other subwatersheds identified by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) include East Dardenne, Sandfort Creek, and un-named Tributaries No. 1 and No. 2. A small portion in the southeast of St. Peters drains to the Missouri River. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling The City’s current stormwater master plan, completed in 2002, included computer models developed at a level of detail suitable for master planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcguire Nuclear Station
    Duke STEVEN DCAPPS ztEnergy, Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Energy MGOJ VP / 12700 Hagers Ferry Rd. Huntersville, NC 28078 980-875-4805 980-875-4809 fax Steven. [email protected] November 26, 2012 10 CFR 50.54(f) U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Subject: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS), Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 Renewed License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17 Flooding Walkdown Information Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuantto Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(0 Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchiAccident; dated March 12, 2012 Reference: 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuantto Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(0 Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 2. NEI 12-07, Guidelines for Performing Verification Walkdowns of Plant Flood ProtectionFeatures, Revision 0-A, dated May 2012 3. NRC Letter to NEI, Endorsement of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-07, "Guidelinesfor Performing Verification Walkdowns of Plant Flood Protection Features",dated May 31, 2012 On March 12, 2012, the NRC staff issued Reference 1. Enclosure 4 of Reference I contained specific Requested Actions, Requested Information, and Required Responses associated with Recommendation 2.3 for Flooding Walkdowns. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54, "Conditions of licenses," paragraph (0, addressees were requested to confirm within 90 days their intent to use the NRC-endorsed flooding walkdown procedures, and to submit their final response within 180 days of the NRC's endorsement of the walkdown procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Pond Biodiversity Report
    POND BIODIVERSITY SURVEY OF WATERBODIES AT ALDEN VALLEY WOODS LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE, ALDEN ROAD, HELMSHORE, ROSSENDALE DISTRICT, LANCASHIRE For Chris Mason 10th April 2014 Dave Bentley BSc (Hons) Dave Bentley Ecology 0161 280 1648 & 07944 122292 [email protected] www.davebentleyecology.co.uk Version 1.1 1 Introduction 1.1 An area of hardstanding in the middle of a former quarry and ex-industrial (cotton mill) site in the southern part of Alden Wood, Alden Road, in Helmshore in the Rossendale District of Lancashire is the subject of a planning application by Chris Mason (who is not the current owner/land manager) to build an Aquaponics Farm. The hardstanding is currently used as a forestry operations yard. An Ecological Scoping Survey has already been completed by the Tyrer Partnership of Formby. This report accompanies that Survey but also updates and corrects it. This report is designed to deal with the value of the two small waterbodies within the quarry area for their potential to support legally protected Great Crested Newts, and also considers the site’s suitability to support other protected aquatic species such as White- clawed Crayfish, Otters and Water Voles. This report also evaluates the waterbodies as wildlife habitats in general. This report updates the Badger survey. The hardstanding is situated at Grid Reference SD774199. A survey was carried out by Ecologist Dave Bentley of Bury on the evening of 10th April 2014 in the company of Chris Mason. 1.2 Dave Bentley has worked in conservation in the Irwell Valley since 1983 and has been an ecological consultant since 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Knight Piésold Ltd
    IDM MINING LTD. RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT TAILINGS DAM BREACH ASSESSMENT PREPARED FOR: IDM Mining Ltd. 1500 – 409 Granville Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada, V6C 1T2 PREPARED BY: Knight Piésold Ltd. Suite 1400 – 750 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2T8 Canada p. +1.604.685.0543 • f. +1.604.685.0147 Knight Piésold VA101-594/4-6 Rev 0 C O N S U L T I N G June 16, 2017 www.knightpiesold.com IDM MINING LTD. RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT TAILINGS DAM BREACH ASSESSMENT VA101-594/4-6 Rev Description Date 0 Issued in Final June 16, 2017 Knight Piésold Ltd. Suite 1400 750 West Pender Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6C 2T8 Telephone: (604) 685-0543 Facsimile: (604) 685-0147 www.knightpiesold.com IDM MINING LTD. RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A tailings dam breach assessment for the Bromley Humps Tailings Management Facility (TMF) was conducted for the Red Mountain Underground Gold Project. The dam breach study presented herein is not a risk assessment and ignores the likelihood of occurrence of a breach. The purpose of the study was to generate inundation maps that are used for evaluating the downstream incremental impacts to population at risk (PAR) and potential loss of life, to environmental and cultural values (including consequences to wildlife and commercial, recreational, and aboriginal (CRA) fisheries), and to infrastructure and economics (CDA 2014). This report also supports the assessment of the “breach or failure of tailings dam or other containment structure” as identified in Section 9 – Accidents and Malfunctions of The Application Information Requirements for the Project (EAO 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 158/Tuesday, August 17
    51112 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 17, 2004 / Notices request: 89,465 (81,765 reporting hours NUCLEAR REGULATORY For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. + 7,700 recordkeeping hours) or an COMMISSION Chandu P. Patel, average of 125 hours per response Project Manager, Section 2, Project (81,765 reporting burden hours/655 [Docket No. 50–400] Directorate II, Division of Licensing Project responses) and an average of 13 hours Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. per recordkeeper (7,700 recordkeeping Carolina Power & Light Company, et al. burden hours/601 recordkeepers). [FR Doc. 04–18732 Filed 8–16–04; 8:45 am] Notice of Withdrawal of Application for BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 9. An indication of whether Section Amendment to Facility Operating 3507(d), Pub. L. 104–13 applies: Not License applicable. NUCLEAR REGULATORY 10. Abstract: Part 70 establishes The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory COMMISSION requirements for licenses to own, Commission (the Commission) has [Docket Nos. 50–413 AND 50–414] acquire, receive, possess, use, and granted the request of Carolina Power & transfer special nuclear material. The Light Company (the licensee) to Duke Energy Corporation; Concerning information in the applications, reports, withdraw its December 8, 2003, the Application for Irradiation of Mixed and records is used by NRC to make application for proposed amendment to Oxide Lead Test Assemblies at licensing and other regulatory Facility Operating License No. NFP–63 Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and determinations concerning the use of for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power 2; Environmental Assessment and special nuclear material. The revised Plant, Unit 1, located in Wake and Finding of No Significant Impact estimate of burden reflects the addition Chatham Counties, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Conowingo Pond Management Plan
    Conowingo Pond Management Plan Publication No. 242 June 2006 SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Paul O. Swartz, Executive Director Denise M. Sheehan, N.Y. Commissioner Kenneth P. Lynch, N.Y. Alternate Scott J. Foti, N.Y. Alternate/Advisor Kathleen A. McGinty, Pa. Commissioner Cathy C. Curran Myers, Pa. Alternate William A. Gast, Pa. Alternate/Advisor Kendl P. Philbrick, Md. Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Summers, Md. Alternate Matthew G. Pajerowski, Md. Alternate/Advisor Major General William T. Grisoli, U.S. Commissioner Colonel Robert J. Davis, Jr., U.S. Alternate Colonel Francis X. Kosich, U.S. Alternate Daniel M. Bierly, U.S. Advisor The Susquehanna River Basin Commission was created as an independent agency by a federal-interstate compact* among the states of Maryland, New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the federal government. In creating the Commission, the Congress and state legislatures formally recognized the water resources of the Susquehanna River Basin as a regional asset vested with local, state, and national interests for which all the parties share responsibility. As the single federal-interstate water resources agency with basinwide authority, the Commission’s goal is to coordinate the planning, conservation, management, utilization, development and control of basin water resources among the public and private sectors. *Statutory Citations: Federal - Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 (December 1970); Maryland - Natural Resources Sec. 8-301 (Michie 1974); New York - ECL Sec. 21-1301 (McKinney 1973); and Pennsylvania - 32 P.S. 820.1 (Supp. 1976). This report is available on our website (www.srbc.net) by selecting Public Information/Technical Reports. For a CD Rom or for a hard copy, contact the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 1721 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Sediment Retention Functions of Salt Pond Systems In
    EVALUATING THE SEDIMENT RETENTION FUNCTION OF SALT POND SYSTEMS IN THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Prepared by: Denise S. Rennis Colin M. Finney Barry E. Devine February 16, 2006 Water Resources Research Institute University of the Virgin Islands St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Disclaimer The research on which this report is based was financed in part by the U. S. Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey, through the Virgin Islands Water Resources Research Institute. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U. S. Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement by the United States Government. i ABSTRACT Salt ponds and the specialized salt-tolerant vegetation communities that they support perform a variety of biological, hydrologic and water quality functions with benefits to both wildlife and humans. This study identified and evaluated the features of salt ponds and their watersheds (salt pond system) that are important in contributing to the effectiveness of the sediment retention function. The study focused on providing information upon which sound management policies could be formulated to protect valuable coastal resources. As part of this study, the use of remote sensing to aid monitoring of sedimentation in coastal waters was evaluated for its potential use as an additional management tool. Thirteen key parameters were identified as being important in the function of sediment retention in salt pond systems of the US Virgin Islands. Data were collected in the field or through GIS analysis of orthophotography for 17 salt pond systems on St.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Guide for Metal and Nonmetal Tailings Disposal
    Information Circular 8755 Design Guide for Metal and Nonmetal Tailings Disposal By Roy L. Soderberg and Richard A. Busch UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interim hos responsibility fu most of our nationally owned public lands ond natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water re- sources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national pork and histmica1 places, and pviding fa the enjoyment of life through outdou recreation. The Deprtment assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has a major re- sponsibility fa American Indian reservation communities and fa people who live in Island Territaies under US. administration. This publication has been cataloged as follows: Soderberg, Roy L Design guide fm metal and nonmetal tailings disposal / by Roy L. Soderberg and Richard A. Busch. [Washington] : United States Depstment of the Interim, Bureau of Mines, 1977. 136 p. ; 27 cm. (Information circular - Bureau of Mines ; 8755) Bibliography: p. 107-111. 1. Tailings (Metallurgy). 2. Mineral industries - Wasre dis- posal. I. Busch, Richard k., joint author. 11. United Stares. Bureau of Mincs. UI. Title. IV. Series: United States. Bureau of Mincs. Information circular - Bureau of Mines ; 8755. TN23.U71 no. 8755 622.06173 U.S. Depr. of the Inr. Library For sale bp tbc Svpcriotcodcnt of DocumeoL1. USGwuoment prioting OMrr Wuhington. D.C. 20402 St& No.
    [Show full text]