DOCSLIB.ORG

Watersheds in Washington with Salmon And/Or Steelhead Identified As NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Watersheds in Washington with Salmon and/or Steelhead identified as NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP ESU Watershed Name Cat Unit 10 digit HUC Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Chief Joseph Subbasin/Upper Columbia/Swamp Creek Watershed 17020005 1702000505 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Chief Joseph Subbasin/Upper Columbia/Swamp Creek Watershed 17020005 1702000505 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Upper Okanogan River Watershed 17020006 1702000601 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Okanogan River/Bonaparte Creek Watershed 17020006 1702000602 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Salmon Creek Watershed 17020006 1702000603 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Okanogan River/Omak Creek Watershed 17020006 1702000604 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lower Okanogan River Watershed 17020006 1702000605 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Similkameen Subbasin/Lower Similkameen River Watershed 17020007 1702000704 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Lost River Watershed 17020008 1702000801 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lost River Watershed 17020008 1702000801 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Upper Methow River Watershed 17020008 1702000802 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Upper Methow River Watershed 17020008 1702000802 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Upper Chewuch River Watershed 17020008 1702000803 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Upper Chewuch River Watershed 17020008 1702000803 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Lower Chewuch River Watershed 17020008 1702000804 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lower Chewuch River Watershed 17020008 1702000804 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Twisp River Watershed 17020008 1702000805 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Twisp River Watershed 17020008 1702000805 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Middle Methow River Watershed 17020008 1702000806 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Middle Methow River Watershed 17020008 1702000806 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Lower Methow River Watershed 17020008 1702000807 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lower Methow River Watershed 17020008 1702000807 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Entiat River Watershed 17020010 1702001001 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Entiat River Watershed 17020010 1702001001 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Lake Entiat Watershed 17020010 1702001002 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lake Entiat Watershed 17020010 1702001002 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Columbia River/Lynch Coulee Watershed 17020010 1702001003 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Columbia River/Sand Hollow Watershed 17020010 1702001004 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon White River Watershed 17020011 1702001101 Upper Columbia River Steelhead White River Watershed 17020011 1702001101 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Chiwawa River Watershed 17020011 1702001102 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Chiwawa River Watershed 17020011 1702001102 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Nason/Tumwater Watershed 17020011 1702001103 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Nason/Tumwater Watershed 17020011 1702001103 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Icicle/Chumstick Watershed 17020011 1702001104 Watersheds in Washington with Salmon and/or Steelhead identified as NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP ESU Watershed Name Cat Unit 10 digit HUC Upper Columbia River Steelhead Icicle/Chumstick Watershed 17020011 1702001104 Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook Salmon Lower Wenatchee River Watershed 17020011 1702001105 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lower Wenatchee River Watershed 17020011 1702001105 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Lower Crab Subbasin/Lower Crab Creek Watershed 17020015 1702001509 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Yakima River/ Hanson Creek Watershed 17020016 1702001604 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Middle Columbia/Priest Rapids Watershed 17020016 1702001605 Upper Columbia River Steelhead Columbia River/Zintel Canyon Watershed 17020016 1702001606 Upper Columbia/Priest Rapids Subbasin/Columbia River/ Zintel Canyon Middle Columbia River Steelhead Watershed 17020016 1702001606 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Upper Yakima River Watershed 17030001 1703000101 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Teanaway River Watershed 17030001 1703000102 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Middle Upper Yakima River Watershed 17030001 1703000103 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Umtanum/Wenas Watershed 17030001 1703000104 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Little Naches River Watershed 17030002 1703000201 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Naches River/Rattlesnake Creek Watershed 17030002 1703000202 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Naches River/Tieton River Watershed 17030002 1703000203 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Ahtanum Creek Watershed 17030003 1703000301 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Upper Lower Yakima River Watershed 17030003 1703000302 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Upper Toppenish Creek Watershed 17030003 1703000303 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Lower Toppenish Creek Watershed 17030003 1703000304 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Satus Creek Watershed 17030003 1703000305 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Yakima River/Spring Creek Watershed 17030003 1703000306 Middle Columbia River Steelhead Yakima River/Cold Creek Watershed 17030003 1703000307 Snake River Basin Steelhead Snake River/Rogersburg Watershed 17060103 1706010301 Snake River Basin Steelhead Asotin River Watershed 17060103 1706010302 Snake River Basin Steelhead Snake River/Captain John Creek Watershed 17060103 1706010303 Snake River Spring/summer chinkook salmon Lower Snake - Aostin 17060103 Snake River Sockeye salmon Lower Snake - Aostin 17060103 Snake River Fall chinook salmon Lower Snake - Aostin 17060103 Snake River Basin Steelhead Grande Ronde River/ Rondowa Watershed 17060106 1706010601 Snake River Basin Steelhead Grande Ronde River/Mud Creek Watershed 17060106 1706010602 Snake River Basin Steelhead Wenaha River Watershed 17060106 1706010603 Snake River Basin Steelhead Chesnimnus Creek Watershed 17060106 1706010604 Snake River Basin Steelhead Upper Joseph Creek Watershed 17060106 1706010605 Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Joseph Creek Watershed 17060106 1706010606 Watersheds in Washington with Salmon and/or Steelhead identified as NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP ESU Watershed Name Cat Unit 10 digit HUC Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Grande Ronde River/ Menatchee Creek Watershed 17060106 1706010607 Snake River Spring/summer chinkook salmon Lower Grande Ronde 17060106 Snake River Fall chinook salmon Lower Grande Ronde 17060106 Snake River Basin Steelhead Alpowa Creek Watershed 17060107 1706010701 Snake River Basin Steelhead Snake River/Steptoe Canyon Watershed 17060107 1706010702 Snake River Basin Steelhead Deadman Creek Watershed 17060107 1706010703 Snake River Basin Steelhead Upper Tucannon River Watershed 17060107 1706010706 Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Tucannon River Watershed 17060107 1706010707 Snake River Basin Steelhead Snake River/Penawawa Creek Watershed 17060107 1706010708 Snake River Spring/summer chinkook salmon Lower Snake - Tucannon 17060107 Snake River Sockeye salmon Lower Snake - Tucannon 17060107 Snake River Fall chinook salmon Lower Snake - Tucannon 17060107 Snake River Spring/summer chinkook salmon Lower Snake 17060110 Snake River Sockeye salmon Lower Snake 17060110 Snake River Fall chinook salmon Lower Snake 17060110 Snake River Fall chinook salmon Lower Salmon 17060111 Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Clearwater River Watershed 17060306 1706030601 Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Lower Potlatch River Watershed 17060306 1706030602 Snake River Basin Steelhead Potlatch River/Middle Potlatch Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030603 Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Big Bear Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030604 Snake River Basin Steelhead Upper Big Bear Creek 17060306 1706030605 Snake River Basin Steelhead Potlatch River/Pine Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030606 Snake River Basin Steelhead Upper Potlatch River Watershed 17060306 1706030607 Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Bedrock Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030608 Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Jack’s Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030609 Snake River Basin Steelhead Big Canyon Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030610 Snake River Basin Steelhead Little Canyon Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030611 Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Lower Orofino Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030612 Snake River Basin Steelhead Jim Ford Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030614 Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Lolo Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030615 Snake River Basin Steelhead Middle Lolo Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030616 Snake River Basin Steelhead Musselshell Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030617 Snake River Basin Steelhead Upper Lolo Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030618 Snake River Basin Steelhead Eldorado Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030619 Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Fivemile Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030620 Watersheds in Washington with Salmon and/or Steelhead identified as NMFS Listed Resources of Concern for EPA's PGP ESU Watershed Name Cat Unit 10 digit HUC Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Sixmile Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030621 Snake River Basin Steelhead Clearwater River/Tom Taha Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030622 Snake River Basin Steelhead Lower Lawyer Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030623 Snake River Basin Steelhead Middle Lawyer Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030624 Snake River Basin Steelhead Cottonwood Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030627 Snake River Basin Steelhead Upper Lapwai Creek Watershed 17060306 1706030628 Snake
Recommended publications
  • The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment

    The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment

    The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................................ A report by The Climate Impacts Group University of Washington Climate Science June 2009 in the Public Interest Recommended citation: Climate Impacts Group, 2009. The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment, M. McGuire Elsner, J. Littell, and L Whitely Binder (eds). Center for Science in the Earth System, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Available at: http://www.cses.washington.edu/db/pdf/wacciareport681.pdf Front cover satellite image credit: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?vev1id=4786 NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Visible Earth: A catalog of NASA images and animations of our home planet Provided by the SeaWiFS Project, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, and ORBIMAGE The Pacific Northwest is cloud-free in this SeaWiFS image. Multihued phytoplankton blooms are visible off of Washington's Olympic coast. Also visible in this image are: Fraser River outflow, snowcapped peaks of Mt. Olympus, Mt. Rainier, Mt. Adams, Mt. Hood, Mt. Jefferson, the Three Sisters, the North Cascades, and the Columbia and Snake River watersheds. Metadata * Sensor OrbView-2/SeaWiFS * Visualization Date 2000-09-26 * The Visible Earth is part of the EOS Project Science Office located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Small images credits: Wheat: © 2009 www.photos.com Coast; Seattle skyline: © J. Martin Grassley McNary Dam: courtesy Bonneville Power Administration Salmon: courtesy University of Washington News and Information Forest: courtesy Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington Report design: Beth Tully, Edit-Design Center, University of Washington The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................
  • Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein

    Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein

    Prepared in Cooperation with the Water Resources Program of the Yakama Nation Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3315 Photograph showing Mount Adams andesitic stratovolcano and Signal Peak mafic shield volcano viewed westward from near Mill Creek Guard Station. Low-relief rocky meadows and modest forested ridges marked by scattered cinder cones and shields are common landforms in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. Mount Adams (elevation: 12,276 ft; 3,742 m) is centered 50 km west and 2.8 km higher than foreground meadow (elevation: 2,950 ft.; 900 m); its eruptions began ~520 ka, its upper cone was built in late Pleistocene, and several eruptions have taken place in the Holocene. Signal Peak (elevation: 5,100 ft; 1,555 m), 20 km west of camera, is one of largest and highest eruptive centers in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field; short-lived shield, built around 3.7 Ma, is seven times older than Mount Adams. 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introductory Overview for Non-Geologists ...............................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Physiography, Environment, Boundary Surveys, and Access ......................................................6 Previous Geologic
  • Draft Clearwater Assessment: 8. Fishery Resources

    Draft Clearwater Assessment: 8. Fishery Resources

    8 Fishery Resources 8.1 Fish Status Currently more than 30 species of fish inhabit the Clearwater subbasin, including 19 native species, two of which have been reintroduced (Table 43). Salmonids and cyprinids are most numerous, representing 10 and 6 species, respectively. Exotic species within the subbasin are generally introduced sport or forage species, and include primarily centrarchids, ictalurids, and salmonids. Five fish species have been chosen as aquatic focal species in this assessment: chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss subspecies), westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi), bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Aquatic focal species may serve as indicators of larger communities, and are listed by federal and/or state agencies as species of concern or, in the case of brook trout, have the potential to negatively impact other selected species. In addition, aquatic focal species had adequate data available for species status, distribution, and habitat use to aid future decision making. Information is also provided for additional species of interest for which only limited data exists, redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss subspecies), Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Although species status is discussed, data limitations for these species prohibits substantial consideration of limiting factors and distribution or condition of existing habitat areas. The resident fishery in Dworshak Reservoir is also considered a substantial fishery resource in the Clearwater subbasin. The Dworshak Reservoir fishery involves multiple species, and is addressed as a single fishery rather than as a large number of individual species. Distribution and status information was compiled for the five aquatic focal species using 23 data sources.
  • Indian Artifacts of the Columbia River Priest

    Indian Artifacts of the Columbia River Priest

    IINNDDIIAANN AARRTTIIFFAACCTTSS OOFF TTHHEE CCOOLLUUMMBBIIAA RRIIVVEERR PPRRIIEESSTT RRAAPPIIDDSS TTOO TTHHEE CCOOLLUUMMBBIIAA RRIIVVEERR GGOORRGGEE IIIDDDEEENNNTTTIIIFFFIIICCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN GGGUUUIIIDDDEEE VVVOOOLLLUUUMMMEEE 111 DDDaaavvviiiddd HHHeeeaaattthhh Copyright 2003 All rights reserved. This publication may only be reproduced for personal and educational use. SSSCCCOOOPPPEEE This document is used to define projectile point typologies common to the Columbia Plateau, covering the region from Priest Rapids to the Columbia Gorge. When employed, recognition of a specified typology is understood as define within the body of this document. This document does not intend to cover, describe or define all typologies found within the region. This document will present several recognized typologies from the region. In several cases, a typology may extend beyond the Columbia Plateau region. Definitions are based upon research and records derived from consultation with; and information obtained from collectors and authorities. They are subject to revision as further experience and investigation may show is necessary or desirable. This document is authorized for distribution in an electronic format through selected organizations. This document is free for personal and educational use. RRREEECCCOOOGGGNNNIIITTTIIIOOONNN A special thanks for contributions given to: Ben Stermer - Technical Contributions Bill Jackson - Technical Contributions Joel Castanza - Images Mark Berreth - Images, Technical Contributions Randy McNeice - Images Rodney Michel
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe

    Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe

    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
  • Lathyrus Bijugatus

    Lathyrus Bijugatus

    Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) FEIS Home Page Lathyrus bijugatus Table of Contents SUMMARY INTRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS FIRE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS APPENDIX REFERENCES Figure 1—Drypark pea in flower. Photo by Tara Luna, used with permission. SUMMARY This Species Review summarizes the scientific information that was available on drypark pea as of February 2021. Drypark pea is a rare, leguminous forb that occurs in eastern Washington and Oregon, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana. Within that distribution, it grows in a broad range of biogeoclimatic zones and elevations. As its common name "drypark pea" suggests, it prefers dry soils and open sites. Drypark pea grows in sagebrush-conifer and sagebrush-grassland transition zones; in ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir, and subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce woodlands and forests; and subalpine fir parklands. In conifer communities, it is most common in open stands. Drypark pea has rhizomes that grow out from its taproot. Its roots host nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium bacteria. Drypark pea regenerates from seed and has a soil-stored seed bank; however, information on seed dispersal, viability, and seedling establishment of drypark pea was not available in the literature. Fire probably top-kills drypark pea, and it likely sprouts from its rhizomes and/or caudex after top-kill; however, these responses are undocumented. Only one study provided information on the response of drypark pea to fire. In ponderosa pine forest in northern Idaho, cover and frequency of drypark pea were similar on unburned plots and plots burned under low or high intensity, when 1 averaged across 3 postfire years.
  • Proposal to Purchase Land Along the Methow River Would Protect Fish

    Proposal to Purchase Land Along the Methow River Would Protect Fish

    Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Habitat ConseRvation – PubliC NotiCe february 2011 Conservancy will own and manage the land. A conservation Proposal to purchase land easement will be placed on the property to permanently along the Methow River protect the land for conservation values. BPA would have Fact Sheet rights of enforcement to the easement. would protect fish habitat Land management: The Methow Conservancy in Okanogan County will lead the development of a baseline assessment and management plan to guide the protection of the land and Location: Winthrop, Okanogan County, Wash. enhancement of the riparian habitat for fish. The management plan will be updated periodically to account 1 Acres: for changes on the property and consider the best Fact Sheet available science. Partners: The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and the Methow Conservancy For more information Purpose: The Bonneville Power Administration is Bonneville Power AdministrAtion: proposing to fund the purchase of land in the Methow Jay Marcotte, project manager, 800-622-4519 or River watershed in north-central Washington to protect 503-230-3943, [email protected] fish habitat. This property was chosen to ensure the ongoingFact success of existing riparianSheet protection projects in ConfederAted triBes And BAnds of the Cedarosa area. The Methow Conservancy already has the YAkAmA Nation: conservation easements on 20 nearby properties. The Brandon Rogers, tribal biologist, 509-949-4109, Methow River watershed is important for fish conservation [email protected] because it supports populations of Upper Columbia spring the methow ConservAncy: chinook salmon, Upper Columbia steelhead, and Jeanne White, conservation project manager, Columbia River bull trout, which are all listed as threatened 1-509-996-2870, [email protected] or endangeredFact under the Endangered Sheet Species Act.
  • Lewis River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing

    Lewis River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing

    United StatesDepartment of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 DesmondDr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey,Washington 98503 In ReplyRefer To: SCANNED 1-3-06-F-0177 sEPI 5 2006 MagalieR. Salas,Secretary F6deralEnergy Regulatory Commission 888First Sffeet,NE WashingtonD.C. 24426 Attention:Ann Ariel Vecchio DearSecretary Salas: This documenttransmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's(Service) Biological Opinion on the effectsto bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus),northern spotted owls (Srrlxoccidentalis caurina)and bald eagles(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) fromthe relicensingof the Lewis River HydroeiectricProjects: Merwin (FERC No. 935),Yale (FERC No. 2071),Swift No. 1 (FERC No. Zr 11),and swift No. 2 (FERCNo. 2213). Theaction that comprises this consultationunder theEndangered Species Act of 1973,as amended (16 U.S.C. l53I et seq.)is therelicensing of the Lewis-RiverHydroelectric Projects by the FederalEnergy Regulatory Commission and the interdependentactions contained in the SettlementAgreement (PacifiCorp et aL.2004e),dated November30,2004,and Washington Department of Ecology's401 Certifications. Consultationfor the relicensingof the Lewis River Plojectswas initiated by the Commission's letterto the Servicewhich was received in our officeon October11,2005. Based on our letter datedMarch15,2006,the deadline for completingthis consultationwas extended by mutual agreementuntil May 5, 2006. On June12,2006,with concurrenceby thelicensees,we submittedanother request for an extensionto SeptemberI,2006, to
  • Potlatch River Steelhead Monitoring and Evaluation Project

    Potlatch River Steelhead Monitoring and Evaluation Project

    POTLATCH RIVER STEELHEAD MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROJECT 2017 AND 2018 BIENNIAL REPORT Prepared by: Brian A. Knoth, Fisheries Biologist Brett J. Bowersox, Fishery Staff Biologist Jason T. Fortier, Fisheries Technician 2 IDFG Report Number 20-15 March 2021 POTLATCH RIVER STEELHEAD MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROJECT 2017 AND 2018 BIENNIAL REPORT By: Brian A. Knoth Brett J. Bowersox Jason T. Fortier Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 IDFG Report Number 20-15 March 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .........................................................................................1 FOREWORD ..............................................................................................................................2 PROJECT OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................2 PROJECT DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 3 PROJECT TIMELINE ..................................................................................................................4 REPORT STRUCTURE ..............................................................................................................4 LITERATURE CITED ...............................................................................................................5 FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................7
  • Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit

    Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit

    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 11. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit 353 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 11 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 11. Yakima River Basin Critical Habitat Unit The Yakima River CHU supports adfluvial, fluvial, and resident life history forms of bull trout. This CHU includes the mainstem Yakima River and tributaries from its confluence with the Columbia River upstream from the mouth of the Columbia River upstream to its headwaters at the crest of the Cascade Range. The Yakima River CHU is located on the eastern slopes of the Cascade Range in south-central Washington and encompasses the entire Yakima River basin located between the Klickitat and Wenatchee Basins. The Yakima River basin is one of the largest basins in the state of Washington; it drains southeast into the Columbia River near the town of Richland, Washington. The basin occupies most of Yakima and Kittitas Counties, about half of Benton County, and a small portion of Klickitat County. This CHU does not contain any subunits because it supports one core area. A total of 1,177.2 km (731.5 mi) of stream habitat and 6,285.2 ha (15,531.0 ac) of lake and reservoir surface area in this CHU are proposed as critical habitat. One of the largest populations of bull trout (South Fork Tieton River population) in central Washington is located above the Tieton Dam and supports the core area.
  • THE PRAIRIE OWL PALOUSE AUDUBON SOCIETY Volume 29, Issue 4, March 2001

    THE PRAIRIE OWL PALOUSE AUDUBON SOCIETY Volume 29, Issue 4, March 2001

    THE PRAIRIE OWL PALOUSE AUDUBON SOCIETY Volume 29, Issue 4, March 2001 PROGRAMS CALENDAR MOSCOW COMMUNITY CENTER MARCH MARCH 21, 2001 - 7:30 P.M. 5 PAS Board Meeting - 7:30pm Bighorn Sheep in Hell's Canyon - Frances 6 Army Corps of Engineers Open House – Cassirer, Wildlife Biologist, Idaho Department 2:00 – 8:00pm, Dworshak of Fish and Game, Clearwater Region. Through also Yukon to Yellowstone Initiative – 7:30pm, a cooperative project between the states of Idaho, University of Idaho Law School Court Rm Oregon, and Washington, the BLM, Forest Service, 13 National ORV Coalition – 7:00pm and the Foundation for North American Wild 21 PAS Membership Meeting - 7:30pm Sheep, researchers are working to restore bighorn Bighorn Sheep in Hell's Canyon sheep to Hells Canyon. Frances’ slide presentation 23-25 Othello Sandhill Crane Festival will provide information about bighorn sheep and 29 Palouse Science Center Meeting – 7:00pm what is being done to restore their populations in 31 Lewiston-Clarkston Field Trip this area. APRIL APRIL 18, 2001 - 7:30 P.M. 2 PAS Board Meeting - 7:30pm Chasing Pronghorn in Yellowstone: an Effort in 18 PAS Membership Meeting - 7:30pm Futility? - Kevin Pullen, Science Instructor and Chasing Pronghorn in Yellowstone: an Asst. Curator of the Conner Museum at WSU. Effort in Futility? 21 Turnbull National Refuge Field Trip Kevin will talk about the research being done on 28 Potlatch River Hike – Bill Warren pronghorn antelope in Yellowstone National Park. He will discuss some of the concerns for the population as well as his experience capturing MAY fawns for tagging and monitoring.
  • Soc 1-1 10.1 Socioeconomics Resource Study (Soc 1)

    Soc 1-1 10.1 Socioeconomics Resource Study (Soc 1)

    PacifiCorp/Cowlitz PUD Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Project Nos. 935, 2071, 2111, 2213 TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.0 SOCIOECONOMICS.................................................................................... SOC 1-1 10.1 SOCIOECONOMICS RESOURCE STUDY (SOC 1).......................... SOC 1-1 10.1.1 Study Objectives......................................................................... SOC 1-1 10.1.2 Study Area .................................................................................. SOC 1-2 10.1.3 Methods ...................................................................................... SOC 1-5 10.1.4 Key Questions............................................................................. SOC 1-7 10.1.5 Results......................................................................................... SOC 1-8 10.1.6 Discussion................................................................................. SOC 1-49 10.1.7 Schedule.................................................................................... SOC 1-51 10.1.8 References................................................................................. SOC 1-52 10.1.9 Comments and Responses on Draft Report .............................. SOC 1-57 SOC 1 Appendix 1 Text of RCW 54.28.050 SOC 1 Appendix 2 Descriptive Text of Money Generation Model LIST OF TABLES Table 10.1-1. Local sources of socioeconomic information...................................SOC 1-5 Table 10.1-2. 1990 population distribution by age in the secondary study area. ................................................................................................SOC