DOCSLIB.ORG

HSF1 Promotes TERRA Transcription and Telomere Protection Upon Heat Stress Sivan Koskas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HSF1 Promotes TERRA Transcription and Telomere Protection Upon Heat Stress Sivan Koskas HSF1 promotes TERRA transcription and telomere protection upon heat stress Sivan Koskas To cite this version: Sivan Koskas. HSF1 promotes TERRA transcription and telomere protection upon heat stress. Devel- opment Biology. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2016. English. NNT : 2016GREAV052. tel-01685262 HAL Id: tel-01685262 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01685262 Submitted on 16 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE LA COMMUNAUTÉ UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES Spécialité : CSV/ Biologie du développement-Oncogenèse Arrêté ministériel : 7 août 2006 Présentée par Sivan KOSKAS Thèse dirigée par Claire VOURC’H et Codirigée par Virginie FAURE Préparée au sein de l’Institut pour l’Avancée des Biosciences site Albert Bonniot Dans l'École Doctorale Chimie et Science du vivant HSF1 promotes TERRA transcription and telomere protection upon heat shock Thèse soutenue publiquement le 27 Septembre 2016 Devant le jury composé de : Pr. Stefan NONCHEV Professeur, IAB, Grenoble (Président) Dr. Valérie MEZGER Directrice de recherche, Paris Diderot (Rapporteur) Dr. Patrick, REVY Directeur de recherche, Paris Descartes (Rapporteur) Dr. Anabelle DECOTTIGNIES Directrice de recherche, Institut de Duve, Bruxelles (Membre) Dr. Vincent GELI Directeur de recherche, CRCM, Marseille (Membre) Pr. Claire VOURC’H Professeur, IAB, Grenoble (Membre) Dr. Virginie FAURE Enseignant-chercheur, IAB, Grenoble (Membre) Table of contents Table of contents ............................................................................................................ 1 Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 6 Résumé .......................................................................................................................... 7 Abbreviations list ........................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 11 Chapter I|Stress and HSF1 ............................................................................................. 12 I. Cellular stress and heat shock response (HSR) .................................................... 12 I. 1. Historical discovery of the HSR .......................................................................... 12 I. 2. Triggers of the HSR ............................................................................................. 13 I. 3. Deleterious effects of cellular stress .................................................................. 15 I. 4. Overview of the HSR .......................................................................................... 18 a/ Heat shock proteins-coding genes activation ................................................ 18 b/ Modulation of other protein coding genes ................................................... 18 c/ Upregulation of non-coding genes ................................................................ 19 d/ Epigenetic modifications ............................................................................... 19 II. Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) ................................................................................. 21 II. 1. Key actor of the cellular HSR .............................................................................. 21 II. 2. Structure ............................................................................................................ 22 a/ DNA Binding Domain (DBD) ........................................................................... 22 b/ Trimerization Domain (HR-A/B) ..................................................................... 23 c/ Regulatory domain (RD) ................................................................................ 24 d/ Spontaneous trimerization domain HR-C ...................................................... 24 e/ Transactivation domain (TAD) ....................................................................... 25 II. 3. Regulation of HSF1 ............................................................................................. 25 a/ Activation ...................................................................................................... 27 b/ Repression ..................................................................................................... 29 III. HSF1 targets and functions in the HSR ................................................................ 32 III. 1. HSE: Heat Shock Elements ................................................................................. 32 III. 2. Chaperones ........................................................................................................ 33 1 III. 3. Heterochromatin ................................................................................................ 36 a/ Constitutive heterochromatin ....................................................................... 36 b/ Nuclear stress bodies (nSBs) .......................................................................... 37 c/ Activation of pericentric satIII ncRNA ............................................................ 37 IV. Other functions of HSF1 ...................................................................................... 40 IV. 1. Fertility and development .................................................................................. 40 IV. 2. Ageing and cancer .............................................................................................. 42 Chapter II|Telomeres and TERRA .................................................................................. 45 I. Telomeres .......................................................................................................... 45 I. 1. Chromatin: general introduction ....................................................................... 45 I. 2. Chromatin at telomeres ..................................................................................... 49 a/ Genomic sequences ....................................................................................... 49 b/ Heterochromatin status ................................................................................ 51 I. 3. Telomere capping ............................................................................................... 54 a/ The T-loop structure ...................................................................................... 54 b/ Shelterin complex .......................................................................................... 55 c/ CST complex .................................................................................................. 56 d/ Vital functions of telomere capping .............................................................. 57 e/ End replication problem ................................................................................ 58 I. 4. Telomere maintenance mechanisms ................................................................. 60 a/ Telomerase .................................................................................................... 60 b/ ALT ................................................................................................................. 63 II. Telomere transcripts – TERRA ............................................................................. 64 II. 1. Biogenesis .......................................................................................................... 64 II. 2. TERRA transcriptional regulation ....................................................................... 67 a/ By promoter methylation .............................................................................. 67 b/ By associated epigenetic histones modifications .......................................... 67 c/ By telomere length and shelterin .................................................................. 69 II. 3. TERRA attributed functions ................................................................................ 70 a/ Telomere length regulation ........................................................................... 71 b/ Telomeric heterochromatin formation ......................................................... 73 c/ Telomere Replication .................................................................................... 74 2 d/ Processing of uncapped telomeres ............................................................... 75 e/ Implications in immunity cancer and disease ................................................ 76 THE PhD PROJECT’S ORIGINS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................... 78 I. The project’s origins ........................................................................................... 79 II. Objectives .......................................................................................................... 81 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Integrity in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: the Interplay of DNA Replication Initiation Factors, Elongation Factors, and Origins
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Chromosome integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the interplay of DNA replication initiation factors, elongation factors, and origins Dongli Huang1,2 and Douglas Koshland1,3 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Embryology, Baltimore, Maryland 21210, USA; 2Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biology, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA The integrity of chromosomes during cell division is ensured by both trans-acting factors and cis-acting chromosomal sites. Failure of either these chromosome integrity determinants (CIDs) can cause chromosomes to be broken and subsequently misrepaired to form gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). We developed a simple and rapid assay for GCRs, exploiting yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We used this assay to screen a genome-wide pool of mutants for elevated rates of GCR. The analyses of these mutants define new CIDs (Orc3p, Orc5p, and Ycs4p) and new pathways required for chromosome integrity in DNA replication elongation (Dpb11p), DNA replication initiation (Orc3p and Orc5p), and mitotic condensation (Ycs4p). We show that the chromosome integrity function of Orc5p is associated with its ATP-binding motif and is distinct from its function in controlling the efficiency of initiation of DNA replication. Finally, we used our YAC assay to assess the interplay of trans and cis factors in chromosome integrity. Increasing the number of origins on a YAC suppresses GCR formation in our dpb11 mutant but enhances it in our orc mutants. This result provides potential insights into the counterbalancing selective pressures necessary for the evolution of origin density on chromosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Changes in the Dnaa-Like Core of the Origin Recognition Complex
    ARTICLES Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the DnaA-like core of the origin recognition complex Megan G Clarey1, Jan P Erzberger1, Patricia Grob1, Andres E Leschziner2, James M Berger1, Eva Nogales1–3 & Michael Botchan1 Structural details of initiator proteins for DNA replication have provided clues to the molecular events in this process. EM reconstructions of the Drosophila melanogaster origin recognition complex (ORC) reveal nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the core of the complex. All five AAA+ domains in ORC contain a conserved structural element that, in DnaA, http://www.nature.com/nsmb promotes formation of a right-handed helix, indicating that helical AAA+ substructures may be a feature of all initiators. A DnaA helical pentamer can be docked into ORC, and the location of Orc5 uniquely positions this core. The results suggest that ATP- dependent conformational changes observed in ORC derive from reorientation of the AAA+ domains. By analogy to the DNA- wrapping activity of DnaA, we posit that ORC together with Cdc6 prepares origin DNA for helicase loading through mechanisms related to the established pathway of prokaryotes. ORC is a conserved, multiprotein complex used to initiate DNA DNA replication, melting of the template provides a portal for replication in all eukaryotes characterized to date1–3. Binding of this loading the helicase. The precise molecular architecture of the eukar- six-subunit assembly to DNA origins marks the first step in DNA yotic helicase has not been resolved completely, but recent data replication and is followed by ORC-directed recruitment of the pre- show that a complex containing the six MCM proteins (MCM2– Nature Publishing Group Group Nature Publishing 6 replication complex (pre-RC) and eventual establishment of bidirect- MCM7), Cdc45 and the four GINS proteins performs this 3 16–18 200 ional DNA replication forks .
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of the DNA Replication Origin Recognition Complex in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repository The architecture of the DNA replication origin recognition complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Zhiqiang Chen, Christian Speck, Patricia Wendel, Chunyan Tang, Bruce Stillman, and Huilin Li ABSTRACT The origin recognition complex (ORC) is conserved in all eukaryotes. The six proteins of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORC that form a stable complex bind to origins of DNA replication and recruit prereplicative complex (pre-RC) proteins, one of which is Cdc6. To further understand the function of ORC we recently determined by single-particle reconstruction of electron micrographs a low-resolution, 3D structure of S. cerevisiae ORC and the ORC–Cdc6 complex. In this article, the spatial arrangement of the ORC subunits within the ORC structure is described. In one approach, a maltose binding protein (MBP) was systematically fused to the N or the C termini of the five largest ORC subunits, one subunit at a time, generating 10 MBP-fused ORCs, and the MBP density was localized in the averaged, 2D EM images of the MBP-fused ORC particles. Determining the Orc1–5 structure and comparing it with the native ORC structure localized the Orc6 subunit near Orc2 and Orc3. Finally, subunit–subunit interactions were determined by immunoprecipitation of ORC subunits synthesized in vitro. Based on the derived ORC architecture and existing structures of archaeal Orc1–DNA structures, we propose a model for ORC and suggest how ORC interacts with origin DNA and Cdc6. The studies provide a basis for understanding the overall structure of the pre- RC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cshperspect-REP-A015727 Table3 1..10
    Table 3. Nomenclature for proteins and protein complexes in different organisms Mammals Budding yeast Fission yeast Flies Plants Archaea Bacteria Prereplication complex assembly H. sapiens S. cerevisiae S. pombe D. melanogaster A. thaliana S. solfataricus E. coli Hs Sc Sp Dm At Sso Eco ORC ORC ORC ORC ORC [Orc1/Cdc6]-1, 2, 3 DnaA Orc1/p97 Orc1/p104 Orc1/Orp1/p81 Orc1/p103 Orc1a, Orc1b Orc2/p82 Orc2/p71 Orc2/Orp2/p61 Orc2/p69 Orc2 Orc3/p66 Orc3/p72 Orc3/Orp3/p80 Orc3/Lat/p82 Orc3 Orc4/p50 Orc4/p61 Orc4/Orp4/p109 Orc4/p52 Orc4 Orc5L/p50 Orc5/p55 Orc5/Orp5/p52 Orc5/p52 Orc5 Orc6/p28 Orc6/p50 Orc6/Orp6/p31 Orc6/p29 Orc6 Cdc6 Cdc6 Cdc18 Cdc6 Cdc6a, Cdc6b [Orc1/Cdc6]-1, 2, 3 DnaC Cdt1/Rlf-B Tah11/Sid2/Cdt1 Cdt1 Dup/Cdt1 Cdt1a, Cdt1b Whip g MCM helicase MCM helicase MCM helicase MCM helicase MCM helicase Mcm DnaB Mcm2 Mcm2 Mcm2/Nda1/Cdc19 Mcm2 Mcm2 Mcm3 Mcm3 Mcm3 Mcm3 Mcm3 Mcm4 Mcm4/Cdc54 Mcm4/Cdc21 Mcm4/Dpa Mcm4 Mcm5 Mcm5/Cdc46/Bob1 Mcm5/Nda4 Mcm5 Mcm5 Mcm6 Mcm6 Mcm6/Mis5 Mcm6 Mcm6 Mcm7 Mcm7/Cdc47 Mcm7 Mcm7 Mcm7/Prolifera Gmnn/Geminin Geminin Mcm9 Mcm9 Hbo1 Chm/Hat1 Ham1 Ham2 DiaA Ihfa Ihfb Fis SeqA Replication fork assembly Hs Sc Sp Dm At Sso Eco Mcm8 Rec/Mcm8 Mcm8 Mcm10 Mcm10/Dna43 Mcm10/Cdc23 Mcm10 Mcm10 DDK complex DDK complex DDK complex DDK complex Cdc7 Cdc7 Hsk1 l(1)G0148 Hsk1-like 1 Dbf4/Ask Dbf4 Dfp1/Him1/Rad35 Chif/chiffon Drf1 Continued 2 Replication fork assembly (Continued ) Hs Sc Sp Dm At Sso Eco CDK complex CDK complex CDK complex CDK complex CDK complex Cdk1 Cdc28/Cdk1 Cdc2/Cdk1 Cdc2 CdkA Cdk2 Cdc2c CcnA1, A2 CycA CycA1, A2,
    [Show full text]
  • Set1-Dependent H3K4 Methylation Becomes Critical for DNA Replication Fork Progression In
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.355008; this version posted October 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Set1-dependent H3K4 methylation becomes critical for DNA replication fork progression in 2 response to changes in S phase dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3 4 Christophe de La Roche Saint-André1* and Vincent Géli1 5 6 1 Marseille Cancer Research Center (CRCM), U1068 Inserm, UMR7258 CNRS, Aix Marseille 7 University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France 8 9 *Corresponding author 10 E-mail [email protected] 11 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.355008; this version posted October 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 12 Abstract 13 DNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin 14 structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In 15 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription- 16 dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we 17 show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of 18 Set1 (set1∆) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a 19 large increase in DNA damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Cdc6 on an Origin DNA Reveals the Mechanism of ORC
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24199-1 OPEN The structure of ORC–Cdc6 on an origin DNA reveals the mechanism of ORC activation by the replication initiator Cdc6 ✉ ✉ Xiang Feng 1, Yasunori Noguchi2,3, Marta Barbon2,3, Bruce Stillman 4 , Christian Speck 2,3 & ✉ Huilin Li 1 1234567890():,; The Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) binds to sites in chromosomes to specify the location of origins of DNA replication. The S. cerevisiae ORC binds to specific DNA sequences throughout the cell cycle but becomes active only when it binds to the replication initiator Cdc6. It has been unclear at the molecular level how Cdc6 activates ORC, converting it to an active recruiter of the Mcm2-7 hexamer, the core of the replicative helicase. Here we report the cryo-EM structure at 3.3 Å resolution of the yeast ORC–Cdc6 bound to an 85-bp ARS1 origin DNA. The structure reveals that Cdc6 contributes to origin DNA recognition via its winged helix domain (WHD) and its initiator-specific motif. Cdc6 binding rearranges a short α-helix in the Orc1 AAA+ domain and the Orc2 WHD, leading to the activation of the Cdc6 ATPase and the formation of the three sites for the recruitment of Mcm2-7, none of which are present in ORC alone. The results illuminate the molecular mechanism of a critical biochemical step in the licensing of eukaryotic replication origins. 1 Department of Structural Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 2 DNA Replication Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cell Cycle State Defines TACC3 As a Regulator Gene in Glioblastoma
    Briggs, Polson et al. 2020 The cell cycle state defines TACC3 as a regulator gene in glioblastoma Authors: Holly Briggs, Euan S. Polson, Bronwyn K. Irving, Alexandre Zougman, Ryan K. Mathew, Deena M.A. Gendoo, and Heiko Wurdak Supplementary file 1 Supplementary tables and figures Supplementary tables Source Weblink Reference THE HUMAN PROTEIN ATLAS https://www.proteinatlas.org/ (22) Cytoscape https://cytoscape.org/ (42) STRING v11 https://string-db.org/ (23) MSig Database https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb (43) KEGG Database https://www.genome.jp/kegg/kegg1.html (45) GEPIA1 & GEPIA2 http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/ (28)(35) (Gene Expression Profiling http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/ Interactive Analysis) Table S1. Use of publicly available data and open source software. Briggs, Polson et al. 2020 CLUSTER GENES c25 FGG,FXYD1,TMX3,ATP13A5,SHOX,CD33,CCKAR,CCNI2,PARVG,DNAJC15,MLIP,FAM110B,HEYL,LAMP3,CLL U1OS,IGSF1,LCE1E,FAM20A,OPTC,TMEM238,CDH5,PLAC8,ARFGEF3,FGL2,LRRC25,PGR,KCNMB4,ASPRV1 ,TLR7,APOBEC3H,DHRS9,NCOA2,CRYGD,CXCL12,CEACAM21,GAB1,CBX2,SMYD1,FGF17,ZBP1,DCN,SLC1 6A12,AIM2,SIGLEC11,ACKR3,C9orf139,CDHR3,IGSF21,RIMS3,H2BFWT,LOC100506801,NLRP7 c32 ALPL,RNF133,HIST3H2BB,GLYAT,ADAMTSL1,FGG,FXYD1,TMX3,ATP13A5,SHOX,CD33,CCKAR,CCNI2,PARV G,DNAJC15,MLIP,FAM110B,HEYL,LAMP3,CLLU1OS,IGSF1,LCE1E,FAM20A,OPTC,TMEM238,CDH5,PLAC8,A RFGEF3,FGL2,LRRC25,PGR,KCNMB4,ASPRV1,TLR7,APOBEC3H,DHRS9,NCOA2,CRYGD,CXCL12,CEACAM2 1,GAB1,CBX2,SMYD1,FGF17,ZBP1,DCN,SLC16A12,AIM2,SIGLEC11,ACKR3,C9orf139,CDHR3,IGSF21,RIMS3, H2BFWT,LOC100506801,NLRP7 c31 TCAF2,ANKRD39,P2RY2,TRPV3,TNFSF11,GPR143,ATP8B5P,CSN1S1,SLC37A2,NOS1,FBXO48,NGB,HBB,EVI
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating DNA Replication and Mitosis Through Ubiquitin/SUMO and CDK1
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Coordinating DNA Replication and Mitosis through Ubiquitin/SUMO and CDK1 Antonio Galarreta 1,† , Pablo Valledor 1,†, Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo 1,2,* and Emilio Lecona 3,* 1 Genomic Instability Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (P.V.) 2 Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Genome Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, S-171 21 Stockholm, Sweden 3 Centre for Molecular Biology Severo Ochoa (CBMSO, CSIC-UAM), Chromatin, Cancer and the Ubiquitin System Lab, Department of Genome Dynamics and Function, 28049 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (O.F.-C.); [email protected] (E.L.) † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: Post-translational modification of the DNA replication machinery by ubiquitin and SUMO plays key roles in the faithful duplication of the genetic information. Among other functions, ubiqui- tination and SUMOylation serve as signals for the extraction of factors from chromatin by the AAA ATPase VCP. In addition to the regulation of DNA replication initiation and elongation, we now know that ubiquitination mediates the disassembly of the replisome after DNA replication termination, a process that is essential to preserve genomic stability. Here, we review the recent evidence showing how active DNA replication restricts replisome ubiquitination to prevent the premature disassembly of the DNA replication machinery. Ubiquitination also mediates the removal of the replisome to allow DNA repair. Further, we discuss the interplay between ubiquitin-mediated replisome dis- assembly and the activation of CDK1 that is required to set up the transition from the S phase to Citation: Galarreta, A.; Valledor, P.; mitosis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Rrm3 Function in Restricting DNA Replication Via an Orc5
    A Novel Rrm3 Function in Restricting DNA Replication via an Orc5-Binding Domain Is Genetically Separable from Rrm3 Function as an ATPase/Helicase in Facilitating Fork Progression Syed, Salahuddin; Madsen, Claus Desler; Rasmussen, Lene J.; Schmidt, Kristina H. Published in: P L o S Genetics DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006451 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Syed, S., Madsen, C. D., Rasmussen, L. J., & Schmidt, K. H. (2016). A Novel Rrm3 Function in Restricting DNA Replication via an Orc5-Binding Domain Is Genetically Separable from Rrm3 Function as an ATPase/Helicase in Facilitating Fork Progression. P L o S Genetics, 12(12), [e1006451]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006451 Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE A Novel Rrm3 Function in Restricting DNA Replication via an Orc5-Binding Domain Is Genetically Separable from Rrm3 Function as an ATPase/Helicase in Facilitating Fork Progression Salahuddin Syed1,2, Claus Desler3, Lene J. Rasmussen3, Kristina H. Schmidt1,4* 1 Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America, 2 Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of South a11111 Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America, 3 Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4 Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States of America * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Syed S, Desler C, Rasmussen LJ, In response to replication stress cells activate the intra-S checkpoint, induce DNA repair Schmidt KH (2016) A Novel Rrm3 Function in pathways, increase nucleotide levels, and inhibit origin firing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Origin Licensing
    Rethinking origin licensing The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Bell, Stephen P. “Rethinking Origin Licensing.” eLife 6 (January 2017): e24052 © 2017 Bell As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24052 Publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109848 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ INSIGHT DNA REPLICATION Rethinking origin licensing Human cells that lack a subunit in their origin recognition complex are viable, which suggests the existence of alternative mechanisms to initiate DNA replication. STEPHEN P BELL Bleichert et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2013). This Related research article Shibata E, Kiran M, ring then binds to the MCM2-7 helicase such Shibata Y, Singh S, Kiran S, Dutta A. 2016. that the latter encircles the DNA adjacent to the Two subunits of human ORC are origin of replication (Sun et al., 2013). Subse- quent events activate MCM2-7, allowing it to dispensable for DNA replication and separate the DNA strands so that they can be proliferation. eLife 5:e19084. doi: 10.7554/ copied (Bell and Labib, 2016). eLife.19084 Given the importance of origin licensing it is not surprising that deleting any of the ORC genes is lethal to yeast cells and fruit flies, and depletion of ORC prevents DNA replication in frog egg extracts (Li and Stillman, 2012). Now, hen a eukaryotic cell divides it must in eLife, Anindya Dutta and colleagues at the replicate its DNA, and the process of University of Virginia School of Medicine – replication starts at hundreds or W including Etsuko Shibata as first author – report thousands of separate sites called origins of rep- that human cells with loss-of-function mutations lication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin Recognition Complex Has Essenual Functions in Transcripuonal Silencing and Chromosomal Replication
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The origin recognition complex has essenual functions in transcripuonal silencing and chromosomal replication Catherine A. Fox, Stephen Loo, Andrew Dillin, and Jasper Rine Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Division of Genetics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA The role of the origin recognition complex (ORC) was investigated in replication initiation and in silencing. Temperature-sensitive mutations in ORC genes caused defects in replication initiation at chromosomal origins of replication, as measured by two-dimensional (2-D) origin-mapping gels, fork migration analysis, and plasmid replication studies. These data were consistent with ORC functioning as a eukaryotic replication initiator. Some origins displayed greater replication initiation deficiencies in orc mutants than did others, revealing functional differences between origins. Alleles of ORC5 were isolated that were defective for silencing but not replication, indicating that ORC's role in silencing could be separated from its role in replication. In temperature-sensitive orc mutants arrested in mitosis, temperature-shift experiments caused a loss of silencing, indicating both that ORC had functions outside of the S phase of the cell cycle and that ORC was required for the maintenance of the silenced state. [Key Words: ORC; silencing; cell cycle; replication; position effect; SIR; yeast; genetics] Received September 22, 1994; revised version accepted March 9, 1995. A central issue in eukaryotic DNA replication is the na- and HMR. Unlike at the expressed locus, MAT, mating- ture of events at replication origins, the positions on type genes at HML and HMR are maintained in a re- chromosomes at which DNA replication initiates.
    [Show full text]