Lithofacies and Sedimentology of the Miocene-Pliocene Ringold
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Kevln A. Lindsey, NorthwestCollege and Universty Assocationfor Scence, c/o WestinghouseHanford Geoscience Group, N,4S|NH4'56, P.O. Box 1970, R chland, Washngton 99352 and Oavid R. Gaylord, Departmenlof Geology,Wash ngton State Un versity,Pullman Washington99164-2A12 Lithofaciesand Sedimentologyof the Miocene-PlioceneRingold Formation,Hanford Site, South-CentralWashington Abstract "unconfined" The Miocene-PlioceneRinsold Formation is one ofthe principal stratigraphicunits vithin the suprabasah aquifer at fie Hanford Site in southcentralWashington. Consequently, undersunding the geologyof the Ringold Fomation is nec€ssary for th€ accuratecharacterization and nodeling of groundwaterflow and contaminanttransport st Hanford. The Ringold For- nation is a conplexly interstralified s€quenceof unconsolidatedto semiconsolidatedclay, silt, sand, and granule to cobble gravel. Evaluation of borehole g€oloeical and geophysicaldata and outcrops on and adjacent to the Hanford Site suggests that the most accuratem€$od for the study of Ringold sedinents is through the use of lithofacies.Six lilhofacies are defin€d using prinarily grain size data and borehol€ geophysicalresponses. These lirhofacies are: l) mud (M), 2) nud and snd (MS), 3) sand(SS), a) sand and granule to pebble gravel (SG),5) sranule to pebble gravet(C), and 6) cobble to boulder gravel (CB). Analysisoflithofacies distributions and associarionsreveal that: l) coarse-grainedlithofacies (CB, G, SG,SS) tend to be concen- trated along conplexly stacked,elongate fluvial chann€l tracts that displat a high degree of vertical interconnectedness,2) fine-$ained lirhofacies(M, MS) tend to occupyrelatively stable positions,and 3) individual lithofsciesidenrified ar ih€ Hanfo.d Site tend to be discontinuouseven over shon lateral distances.Based on the analysisof lithofaci€s distributions and associa, tions mo.€ accurareappraisals of the hydrogeolosy of the Hanford Site are possible. Introduction Geologic Setting Thousandsof tons of radioactive and other haz- Suprabasaltterrigenous clastic sediments (Figure ardouswastes have been introduced into the late l), including the Ringold Formation,are present Cenozoicsediments on the Hanford Site, Wash- throughout much of the central Columbia Pla- ington,since the late 1940's(PNL, 1986,1987). teau in south-centralWashington (Grollier and The accumulationof thesewastes has necessi Bingham1971, l9?B; Myers et oL 1979;Tallman tated a long-termprogram of groundwatermon- et al. 1979,1981;Fecht et al. 1985).Regionally, itoring and geohydrologiccharacteization of the the Ringold Formation consistsof up to 280 m unconfinedaquifer to assessthe extent of pres- of interstratified unconsolidatedto cemented ent and potentialfuture groundwatercontamina- clay,silt, sand,and granuleto cobble-sizedgravel tion in this area.The Miocene-PlioceneRingold deposited in fluvial and lacustrine settings Formation is the principal stratigraphic unit (Newcomb 1958; Bjornstad 1985; Fecht et al within the suprabasalt "unconfined" aquifer; 1985;DOE 1988).Exposures of the Ringold For- thus,its stratigraphicand sedimentarycomplex- mation are limited because of an extensive ities are important to the characterizationof the Pleistocene-Holocenesedimentary cover and ero- groundwaterflow system,A fundamentalparam- sion by catastrophic, proglacial Pleistocene eter in stiatigraphic and sedimentarystudies are floods.However, informative outcrops exist; 1) on lithofacies(Miall 1977,l97B; Rust 1978). the White Bluffs north and east of the Colum- bia River,2) in ravinesand couleesbetween This paper presentsfindings from a study of Wallula Gap and MosesLake, Washington,and primarily subsurfacelithofacies identified in the 3) near prominent anticlinal ridges including Ringold Formationon and immediatelyadjacent RattlesnakeMountain, the SaddleMountains, to the HanfordSite. The paperreevaluates the Gable Mountain, and the FrenchmanHills (Fig- five-tieredsubdivisions of the Ringold Formation ures 2 and 3). generallyused at the Hanford Site (Myers e, al The Ringold Formation at the Hanford Site 1979;DOE 1988),suggests alternative methods consists dominantly of sand and granule to for characterizing these strata, and presents cobble-sizedgravel with lesser,yet still signifi- sedimentologicalinterpretations, canl amountsof clay, silt, and sand (Nevcomb Northrest Science,Vol. 64, No. 3, 1990 165 drill core, while Leopoldand Nickman(l98l) o determineda Mioceneage for the oldestRingold o Holocenesurficial strataon the basisof pollensamples collected nearthe baseof the RingoldFormation. Fecht dep06its et al. (I9BS)established a maximum age of 8.5 |! Ma for the Ringold Formationfrom K-Ar whole- q, - unconformity - rock dating of the underlying Miocene basalt (McKee er al. 197?) ard a minimum age of 3.4 o Hanfordformation a1 Ma on the basisof paleomagneticdata and ver- unconformity tebrate fossil evidence. Early'Palouse' soil c, unconformity PreviousStudies .L All suprabasaltsediments (including strata now Plio-Pleistoceneunit assignedto the Ringold Formation)on the cen- tral ColumbiaPlateau and in the easternfoothills o) unconformity of the southernWashington Cascades were orig- t inally assignedto the Ellensburg Formation by Smith (1901). Smith's stratigraphy was later Ringold modifiedby Merriamand Buwalda(1917), who 'F assigned the fine-grained terrigenous clastic q, Formation sedimentsexposed on the White Bluffs and near F Pasco, Washington to a unit they called the unconformity RingoldFormation. Culver (193?) later mapped ColumbiaRiver the Ringold Formationacross the centralColum- (1917) BasaltGroup bia Plateau.Both Merriamand Buwalda and Culver (193?)restricted their definition of the Ringold Formation to strata exposedat the surface. Iigue 1. Generalized srratigraphy of the late Cenozoic sediments in the Pasco Basin, southcentral The concurrentestablishment of the Hanford Washington. Site and expansionof nearbyirrigated farmland in the early 1940's resulted in numerous test 1958; Newcombet al. 1972; Myerc et al- 1979; boreholesand production wells that revealeda Tallman et al. 1979,l98l; Bjornstad1984, 1985); sequenceof buied sedimentsoverlying the Co- it is greater than 50 m rhick at most localities lumbia River BasaltGroup. A significantpropor- and reachesa maximum thicknessof260 m near tion of thesestrata were found to be subsurface the centerof the HanfordSite. Exposures ofthe ertensionsof Ringold exposuresfound on the Ringold Formation along the White Bluffs (Fig- White Bluffs (Newcombl95B). As a result, the ure 3) consistof up to 125m of interbeddedclay, Ringold Formation wasredefined to include all silt, sand, and relatively minor granule to cob- sedimentarystrata in the PascoBasin that overlie ble gravel.These exposuresgenerally lie strati- the Columbia River Basalt Group and that un- graphicallyabove those Ringold strata described derlie Pleistoceneglaciofluvial deposits (New- from the Hanford Site. comb 1958). Ringold Formationstrata originally were con- sideredto be Pleistocene-aged(Merriam and The Ringold Formation as defined at the Buwalda 1917. Newcomb 1958. Grollier and HanfordSite by Newcomb(1958) and Myersel Bingham1971, Newcomb et al. 1972).However, al. (1979\ is divided into the following five subsequentpaleontologic, paleomagnetic, and lithostratigraphicunits. Theseare the: l) gravel- palynologicstudies haye demonstrated a greater dominatedbasal unit. 2) interstratified to mixed age for the Ringold. Gustafson(1973, 1980) and clay,silt, sand,and local gravelof the lower unit 'blue Packerand Johnson (1979) suggesred a Miocene (including the prominent clays' of geologic to Plioceneage basedon paleomagneticand drill logs),3) quartzosegravel of the middle unit, paleontologicdata from Ringoldexposures and 4) interstratified to mixed clay, silt, and sandof 166 Lindseyand Gaylord Figur€ 2. Ceo$aphic selting o{ south-centralVashingron and location of rhe Hanford Site. the upper unit, and 5) Iocally-derivedbasaltic and accompanyinggeophysical data (primarily gravel of the fanglomerate unit. Only the fan- natural gamma and neutron-neutronlogs) from glomerateunit, upper unit, and upper part of the 147 boreholesthat extendto basaltwere chosen middle unit crop out. Offsite the Ringold For- for study. The majority of the sedimentsamples mation ha6 been subdivided on the basis of availablefrom thoseholes are drill cuttings. In- lithofacies(Grollier and Bingharn1971, 1978). terpretativestratigraphic sections, that are con- Theselithofacies are not the sameas those de- structed from this joint geologic/geophysical finerl in thic.pnn.r database,forrn the basis for identification and descriptionoflithofacies and the constructionof Methods isolith, isopach, and lithofacies maps. Six lithofaciesare defined primarily on the basisof Discussionof the Ringold Formationin this grain size descriptionsfrom geologicdrill logs, paperis largelyrestricted to subsurfaceinvestiga- textural analyses,and to a very limited extent, tions at the Hanford Site (Figures2 and 3); our from boreholegeophysical logs, cores,and out- crops on the Hanford Site are uncommon and crops.These lithofacies are: l) mud (M),2)mud only occur along the flanks of a few anticlinal and sand(MS), 3) sand(SS), 4) sandand granule ridges.Borehole geologic logs, sediment samples, to pebblegravel (SG), 5) granulero pebblegravel Lithofacies and Sedimentologyof the Ringold Formation 167 SADDLEMOUNTAINS lOOD&DR rooB&c0 Pe-sJQ<E.," rd---l20ow-:-. I zxtE t----rIl \J YAIQUA SEPARATIONAREAS A PPRO X IMA TE POSITIONOF c Ross- sEcTto N ca""* ILLUSTFATED