John and His Writings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John and His Writings u't V\UrV (Qornell Ittiueraitg Cibtarg Stljata. New ^ork THE GIFT OF ALFRED C. BARNES 1889 r^ ly The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029342437 BOOKS BY THE RAMF, AUTHOR Biblical Introduction Series JOHN AND HIS WRITINGS By D. A. HAYES ProfcMor of New Teitament Interpretation in the Graduate School of Theology Garrett Biblical Institute THE METHODIST BOOK CONCERN NEW YORK CINCINNATI b s A^fli '-\ Copyright, 1917, by D. A. HAYES ;_) The Bible text used in this volume is taken from the American Standard Edition of the Revised Bible, copyright, igoi, by Thomas Nelson & Sons, and is used by permission. First Edition Printed January, 1917 Reprinted, February, 1919 ;- 1 '. I 111 ^f T 1 )1 :n' TO WILLIAM DAVID SCHERMERHORN MY FORMER PUPIL AND PRESENT ASSOCIATE A MAN OF JOHANNINE EXPERIENCE AND LIFE CONTENTS PAGE Foreword g PART I. THE APOSTLE JOHN I. John the Little Known 15 II. John the Unrecorded and Disregarded 22 III. John in the New Testament 26- IV. John in Tradition and Legend 34 V. John the Son of Thunder 44 VI. John the Saint and Seer 55 PART II. THE MOST REMARKABLE GOSPEL: THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO JOHN I. Some Remarkable Estimates 77 II. Some Remarkable Omissions 80 III. Some Remarkable New Features 89- IV. A Remarkable Work of Art 92 V. Other Remarkable Characteristics 97 VI. Occasion and Aim iio- VII. Contents 114 VIII. The Johannine Authorship Disputed 119 IX. Discoveries Favorable to Authenticity 127 X. Was John an Early Martyr? 129 XI. Claims of John the Presbyter 136 XII. Evidence Favorable to Authenticity 142 XIII. Opposition and Defense; Conclusion 151 PART III. THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN I. What Shall We Call It? 159 II. Relation to the Fourth Gospel 163 III. Genuineness and Date 172 IV. Heresies Combated 173 V. A Final and Crowning Revelation 176 VI. The Epistle of Love i77 VII. The Epistle of Knowledge 180 VIII. The Epistle of the Incarnation 184 IX. The Epistle of the Atonement 186 X. The Epistle of Personal Experience 188 7 8 CONTENTS PAGB XI. The Epistle of Fellowship 189 XII. The Epistle of Purity 19.2 XIII. The Epistle of Victory 196 PART IV. THE MINOR EPISTLES OP JOHN I. General Character 205 II. The External Evidence 205 III. The Internal Evidence 207 IV. John the Elder 208 V. The Person Addressed in the Second Epistle 209 VI. Some Notes on the Second Epistle 211 VII. Notes on the Third Epistle 214 VIII. Value of These Epistles 216 PART V. THE APOCALYPSE I. Relation to the Other Johannine Writings 223 II. The External Evidence 237 III. The Date 244 IV. General Characteristics of the Apocalyptical Lit- erature 247 V. The Jewish Apocalypses 252 VI. The Apocai^ypse of John and the Jewish Apocalypses 257 VII. A Mysterious Revelation 260 VIII. The Fourfold Assurance of the Beginning and the Fearful Threat at the End 265 IX. Two Reasons Why the Inspiration of the Book has Been Doubted 268 X. Some Curiosities of Exegesis 270 XI. Best General Attitude toward the Book 276 XII. Different Schools of Interpretation 277 XIII. Best System of Interpretation 279 XIV. General Characteristics 285 XV. Salient Features of Its Teaching 303 XVI. How to Read the Apocalypse 307 XVII. A Fitting End of the Bible 310 Bibliography 315 Indexes 319 FOREWORD At the close of our volume on Paul and His Epistles we said that John was the greatest theologian of the apostolic times ; and, while we recognized that the Pauline influence had dominated the thought and life of the church at large, and we believed that it ought to do so until the missionary and evangelistic work of the church was done, we prophesied that then the Johannine theology would be the supreme influence in the days of the church's edification and consummation in love. That prophecy indi- cates our estimate of the final position to be accorded the apostle John. We believe that as the church grows in grace and becomes more and more like its Lord it will more and more agree with him that John is the disciple most worthy of its love. There is a disposition at the present time with a certain class of writers to emphasize the dependence of John upon Paul, and these writers try to make it appear that the author of the Johannine books was a disciple of Paul even more fully than he was a disciple of Jesus. We believe that John always was a receptive soul and that he probably learned much from Paul, as from every other strong per- sonality with whom he came into contact, but the supreme influence in all his more mature life was that of the Master. For the most part he was one of the quiet in the land, and he stood nearest to the Master, and he saw deepest into the Master's spirit and truth, and he meditated longest upon these things, and in the end he formulated more fully than any other the essentials of the new faith ; and as far as he went we believe that he has spoken the final word in this field. lo FOREWORD Paul was taught by the Spirit, but John had had the additional advantage of the three years of teaching by the Incarnate Lord. After Pentecost the Spirit of Jesus led him into all the truth. His personal experience and the history of the church taught him "new significance and fresh result" from many of his early memories of the Master's teaching and life. At last he was prepared to write the consummation of the New Testament revelation, the final residuum of the first century's experience in the origin and the development of Christian truth. After Peter had been crucified and Paul had been beheaded, John was left to carry on the work and to perfect the faith for an- other entire generation in the church. What Jesus had taught in the first third of the century and what Peter and Paul had preached in the second third of the century John meditated upon through the last third of the century, and in this period he wrote the epistles, the Apocalypse, and the Gospel. They represent the highest reach of apostolic inspiration. This book will be perfect anathema in the eyes of those who are accustomed to treat the Johannine literature as anonymous or pseudonymous, and to regard the contents of these books as composed mainly of "such stuff as dreams are made of." We believe that the church tradition is vera- cious and trustworthy which assigns the authorship of the five Johannine books to the apostle John. We believe that the fourth Gospel is no romance, to be interpreted either allegorically or rationalistically. We believe in its historical trustworthiness, and we follow the apostle John as our supreme authority both as to fact and to faith. There was the old parallel of the two pictures of Socrates given us in the Memorabilia of Xenophon on the one hand and the Dialogues of Plato on the other, with the two pic- tures of Jesus furnished us by the synoptic Gospels on the one hand and the fourth Gospel on the other. It used to be a commonplace of criticism to affirm that the former FOREWORD II picture in the two cases was the prosaic, historical, and reliable one, while the latter was poetical, idealistic, and imaginative. It is interesting to see that there is a tendency at present among the classical scholars to revise that opinion and to believe that Plato, after all, has given us the truer picture of the great master; and we confidently expect that the final judgment in the case of the Gospels will be favorable to the greater value of that presentation of the Master's life and teaching which belongs to the one who loved him most and served him longest upon the earth. As his Gospel is better than any one of the synoptics, so we regard his first epistle as better than any one of the epistles of Paul. The difference in their writings marks the difference in the men. Paul is the greatest of the scribes, learned in the law ; John is the greatest of the seers, learned in love. Paul deals with syllogisms; John deals with intuitions. Paul argues and convinces ; John sees and declares. Paul is an advocate; John is a prophet. Paul proves with inevitable logic ; John proclaims with irrefuta- ble insight. Paul's proofs press upon each other like waves dashing over fortifications of sand on the beach. John's thought moves calmly and majestically like the ripples which spread outward in ever-widening circles till they are lost to sight, when you drop a pebble into the dimpling surface of the sleeping lake. Paul's epistles are treatises, arguing from premises to conclusions in logical order and formal structure. John's epistles are serenely unconscious of system and superior to formal argument. John makes confident affirmation of truth which he is sure will be self-attesting. He only has to utter it and let it stand. His sentences are like the Sequoia of the Pacific Coast, every one a giant which stands alone. Great spiritual intuitions are expressed with uttermost simplicity in giant sublimity of strength. The genius of John is most in evidence in the ease with which he unites the historical with the ideal, grasps the meaning — 12 FOREWORD of all phenomena, and sees the ultimate truth behind the surface event in the Apocalypse, the epistle, and the Gospel.
Recommended publications
  • Per Una Bibliografia Sulla Riforma (2016-2017)1 La Riforma Del XVI Secolo
    1 Per una bibliografia sulla Riforma (2016-2017)1 La Riforma del XVI secolo - A Companion to the Swiss Reformation, ed. E. Campi & A. Nelson Burnett, Leiden, Brill, 2016, pp. 821 - Ablasskampagnen des Spätmittelalters. Luthers Thesen von 1517 im Kontext, ed. by A. Rehberg, Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton, 2017, pp. xviii, 712 [Ablasskampagnen des Spätmittelalters] - CH. ABSMEIER, Der Einfluss Philipp Melanchthons auf den Ausbau des schlesischen Schulwesens, in «Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte», 107 (2016), pp. 316-328 - D. ACCIARINO, Semantics and Ideology During the Renaissance: Confessional Translations of the Greek Word ἐπίσκοπος, in «Reformation & Renaissance Review», 19 (2017), pp. 19- 29 - A. ADAMCZYK, Überlegungen Leonhard Krenzheims zu totgeborenen Kindern und ihr Einfluss auf die schlesische Begräbniskultur vom Ende des 16. bis zum Anfang des 17. Jahrhunderts, in Die Reformierten in Schlesien, pp. 303–326 - A. A. AFANASYEV, La doctrina sobre el precio justo en el manual De Confessores e Penitentes (1549) de Fr. Rodrigo Do Porto, ofm, in «Cauriensia», 11 (2016), pp. 53-82 - G. ALFANI, The reformation, the Council of Trent and the divergence of spiritual kinship and godparenthood across Europe: a long-run analysis, in The History of Families and Households Comparative European Dimensions, eds. S. Sovic, P. Thane & P. Viazzo, Leiden, Brill, 2016, pp. 142-167 - R. P. ALMASY, Richard Hooker, Reformed Sermon Making, and the Use of Scripture, in Richard Hooker and Reformed Orthodoxy, pp. 155-174 - A. AMEND-TRAUT, Judikative Folgen des Bauernkriegs nach Quellen der Höchsten Gerichte im Alten Reich, in Bauernkrieg in Franken, pp. 223-266 - N. AMMERMANN, Luther und die Musik, Bielefeld, Luther-Verlag, 2017, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Epistle of John
    The Second Epistle Of John A Study Guide With Introductory Comments, Summaries, And Review Questions Student Edition This material is from ExecutableOutlines.com, a web site containing sermon outlines and Bible studies by Mark A. Copeland. Visit the web site to browse or download additional material for church or personal use. The outlines were developed in the course of my ministry as a preacher of the gospel. Feel free to use them as they are, or adapt them to suit your own personal style. To God Be The Glory! Executable Outlines, Copyright © Mark A. Copeland, 2011 2 The Second Epistle Of John Table Of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter One 5 This study guide was designed for adult Bible classes, though it might be suitable for junior and senior high classes as well. Some have used it for personal devotions, and others in small study groups. In whatever way it can be used to the glory of God, I am grateful. • Points to ponder for each chapter are things I emphasize during the class. • Review questions are intended to reinforce key thoughts in each chapter. There is a “teacher’s edition” available with answers included. ExecutableOutlines.com 3 The Second Epistle Of John Introduction In the 1st century A.D., the early church enjoyed remarkable growth and spread throughout the world at that time (Ac 8:5; Ro 10:14-18; Col 1:5-6,23). What accounted for this spread of the gospel? There were likely several factors, but one was the hospitality of the early Christians... • Paul was able to travel and depend upon Christians opening their homes to him - cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parousia
    The Parousia A Careful Look at the New Testament Doctrine of our Lord’s Second Coming, By James Stuart Russell By James Stuart Russell Originally digitized by Todd Dennis beginning in 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS HIGH PRAISE FOR "THE PAROUSIA" PREFACE TO THE BOOK INTRODUCTORY. THE LAST WORDS OF OLD TESTAMENT PROPHECY. THE BOOK OF MALACHI The Interval between Malachi and John the Baptist PART I. THE PAROUSIA IN THE GOSPELS. THE PAROUSIA PREDICTED BY JOHN THE BAPTIST The Teaching of our Lord Concerning the Parousia in the Synoptical Gospels:- Prediction of Coming Wrath upon that Generation Further allusions to the Coming Wrath Impending fate of the Jewish nation (Parable of the Barren Fig-tree) The End of the Age, or close of the Jewish dispensation (Parables of Tares and Drag-net) The Coming of the Son of Man (the Parousia) in the Lifetime of the Apostles The Parousia to take place within the Lifetime of some of the Disciples The Coming of the Son of man certain and speedy (Parable of the Importunate Widow) The Reward of the Disciples in the Coming AEon, i.e. at the Parousia Prophetic Intimations of the approaching Consummation of the Kingdom of God:- i. Parable of the Pounds ii. Lamentation of Jesus over Jerusalem iii. Parable of the Wicked Husbandman iv. Parable of the Marriage of the King's Son v. Woes denounced on the Scribes and Pharisees vi. Lamentation (second) of Jesus over Jerusalem vii. The Prophecy on the Mount of Olives The Prophecy on the Mount examined:- I. Interrogatory of the Disciples II.
    [Show full text]
  • NT 617 Exegesis of Johannine Literature Jan Van Der Watt
    Asbury Theological Seminary ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Syllabi eCommons 1-1-2004 NT 617 Exegesis of Johannine Literature Jan Van Der Watt Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi Recommended Citation Van Der Watt, Jan, "NT 617 Exegesis of Johannine Literature" (2004). Syllabi. Book 1327. http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi/1327 This Document is brought to you for free and open access by the eCommons at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY EXEGESIS OF THE JOHANNINE LITERATURE (NT 617) Jan Van Der Watt, Fall 2004 1. Course details 1.1 Person responsible: Jan van der Watt will offer this course. (Since I am a visiting scholar, you might want to get to know me and my institution better. Please go to www.up.ac.za , then to ‘Academic departments’ and then to ‘Department of New Testament Studies’). 1.2 Contact details: [email protected] 1.3 Duration: Fall 2004 1.4 Contact sessions and hours of credit: three (3) hours per week for the duration of the second semester 2004. Total hours of credit: 37.5 1.5 Prerequisites: NT[IBS] 510 or 511; NT 520; and NT 500 or 501/502 or equivalent. May be taken by students in MA programs not requiring Greek by special arrangement with the professor 2. Description A study of selected passages in Johannine literature this course will deal with the various textual, historical, exegetical, theological, and ethical concerns raised in Johannine literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Revelation: Introduction by Jim Seghers
    The Book of Revelation: Introduction by Jim Seghers Authorship It has been traditionally believed that the author of the Book of Revelation, also called the Apocalypse, was St. John the Apostle, the author of the Gospel and Epistles that bears his name. This understanding is supported by the near unanimous agreement of the Church Fathers. However, what we learn from the text itself is that the author is a man named John (Rev 1:1). Arguing against John the evangelist’s authorship is the fact that the Greek used in the Book of Revelation is strikingly different from the Greek John used in the fourth gospel. This argument is countered by those scholars who believe that the Book of Revelation was originally written in Hebrew of which our Greek text is a literal translation. The Greek text does bear the stamp of Hebrew thought and composition. In addition there are many expressions and ideas found in the Book of Revelation which only find a parallel in John’s gospel. Many modern scholars have the tendency to focus almost exclusively on the literary aspects of the sacred books along with a predisposition to reject the testimony of the Church Fathers. Therefore, many hold that another John, John the Elder or John the Presbyter [Papias refers to a John the Presbyter who lived in Ephesus], is the author of the Apocalypse. One scholar, J. Massyngberde Ford, provides the unique suggestion that John the Baptist is the author of the Book of Revelation ( Revelation: The Anchor Bible , pp. 28-37). Until there is persuasive evidence to the contrary, it is safe to conclude that St.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Scriptures in Small Groups the First
    STUDYING THE SCRIPTURES IN SMALL GROUPS THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN By Don Krow A Three Step Approach STEP ONE: Read the verses from the various translations and stop and discuss them among your group. STEP TWO: Insights from the Greek. Go behind the English language by reading from Greek Lexicons (Dictionaries), and looking at the Greek tenses as well as some short commentary. Then discuss among your group. STEP THREE: Questions are provided that will take you directly to the Scriptures to again discuss what you have already seen and understood. Copyright © 2010, Don W. Krow To be used for Bible Study purposes only, Not to be sold. This Book is dedicated to Wayne & Jan Knurr our Friends in the Faith Discipleship Evangelism P.O. Box 17007 Colorado Springs, CO 80935-7007 U.S.A. www.delessons.org www.krowtracts.com 1 A Three Step Approach To Understanding THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN STEP ONE: STEP ONE: Read the verses from the various translations and stop and discuss them among your group. The Bible was originally written in Hebrew and Greek and copied many times. It was then translated into many languages of the world. Many different translations have been made and used throughout church history. The word “translate” carries the idea of “expressing in another language but retaining the original message of the author.” The Bible has a message and a context. What did the Apostles mean when they wrote these letters? What does the passage actually say? Do we read our own meaning into these letters? Or do we listen to what the text actually says and draw out its meaning? These questions must be asked to every honest Bible student who is seeking the truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read the First Epistle of John Non-Polemically
    How to Read the First Epistle of John Non-Polemically While the title may sound strange, most exegetes would agree that the First Epistle of John is a polemical text. Yet, can a polemical text be read non-polemically? As we shall see, many exegetical difficulties are linked with a polemical determination of 1 John. I would go so far as to say that since the polemical character of 1 John has been seen as the key to many exegetical issues of 1 John, the non-polemical approach can provide new solutions to most of them. Further, I argue that, in the case of 1 John, polemics or non-polemics is not a question of one’s desire for peace, but a question of the text. In many points the non- polemical approach is much closer to the text than a polemical reading. In the context of the dominance of polemical readings “How to Read 1 John Non-Polemically” is a real question. What follows is not a recipe for the most adequate approach to 1 John, albeit an approach to the text that will challenge some agreements of Johannine scholarship. I. Polemical and Non-Polemical Readings of 1 John 1. The Traditional Polemical Paradigm The exegesis of 1 John is, in most cases, dominated by the ques- tion of the opponents. There is, however, a lot of dissent in the on- going historical debate about the opponents. But looking at the hermeneutical basis of the current approaches, one can claim that, despite all their discord, the majority of readings and commentaries of 1 John agree on four points: (1) A basic assumption for them is that in a more or less mirror-like reading, it is possible to reconstruct who the opponents were and what actually happened in the Johannine community(1).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christianity in Transjordan
    Tyndale Bulletin 45.1 (1994) 97-117. EARLY CHRISTIANITY IN TRANSJORDAN Bastiaan Van Elderen Summary Considerable archaeological field work is currently being conducted in the area of the Decapolis, including the author’s involvement in the excavations of Abila. This article reviews the few references to northern Transjordan in the New Testament and the references in early Christian literature which suggest that Jewish Christianity flourished in Transjordan in the early Christian centuries. Archaeological evidence indicates a rich floruit of Byzantine Christianity in Transjordan. A study of literary allusions relating to this area and the current archaeological work promise new light on this little-known phase of early Christianity. One of the blank pages in ancient church history is the beginning stages of the movement of Christianity to the east. The movement of Christianity as presented in the Acts of the Apostles was to the west. Nothing is reported about the movement of Christianity to the south apart from the report of the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch; or of the movement to the east apart from the report of Christians in Damascus whom Saul sought to apprehend. On the other hand, there are some scattered references in the literature of the early church. In view of increasing archaeological work in the Transjordan area it may be useful to assemble some of these data from the literary sources to provide a framework in which to evaluate this current and future archaeological work. Perhaps a word of caution is in order first of all. Archaeological data relating to pre-Constantinian Christianity are extremely limited.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 John 2003 Edition Dr
    Notes on 1 John 2003 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable Introduction HISTORICAL BACKGROUND This epistle does not contain the name of its writer, but from its very early history the church believed the Apostle John wrote it. Several ancient writers referred to this book as John's writing.1 Though modern critics have challenged this view they have not destroyed it. Neither is there any reference to who the first recipients of this epistle were or where they lived other than that they were Christians (2:12-14, 21; 5:13). They may have been the leaders of churches (2:20, 27). According to early church tradition John ministered in Ephesus, the capital of the Roman province of Asia, for many years after he left Palestine. We know that he knew the churches and Christians in that Roman province well from Revelation 2 and 3. Perhaps his readers lived in that province. The false teachers and teachings to which he alluded suggest that John wrote about conditions that existed in Asia: Judaism, Gnosticism, Docetism, the teachings of Cerinthus (a prominent Gnostic), and others.2 These philosophies extended beyond Asia, but they were present there during John's lifetime. This is one of the most difficult of all the New Testament books to date. One of the few references in the book that may help us date it is 2:19. If John meant that the false teachers had departed from among the apostles, a date in the 60s seems possible. This would place it about A.D. 60-65, before the Jewish revolts of A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consciousness of Sin in I John Eugene J
    Document generated on 10/02/2021 7:53 a.m. Laval théologique et philosophique The Consciousness of Sin in I John Eugene J. Cooper Volume 28, Number 3, 1972 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1020312ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1020312ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval ISSN 0023-9054 (print) 1703-8804 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Cooper, E. J. (1972). The Consciousness of Sin in I John. Laval théologique et philosophique, 28(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.7202/1020312ar Tous droits réservés © Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval, This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit 1972 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF SIN IN I JOHN E ugene J. C o o p e r A. INTRODUCTION GAINST the background of the well-known antitheses1 of the Johannine A Writings — for example, darkness and light — which form the basis for such Johannine themes as the “world”, the concepts of sin, suchhamartia, as cmomia and adikia2 will be considered in the context of those passages which the exegetes emphasize as being the most important for understanding the Johannine concept of sin.3 One may be tempted to consider the Johannine antithesesprimitive as and over-simplified manners of expression which are especially suited to the mentality of the early Christians, as the vocabulary of the times,4 but which have no actual relevance today.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Spirituality
    THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM Ascertaining the literary dependence of the Synoptic Gospels constitutes what is commonly termed the Synoptic Problem. Site to compare Gospels: http://sites.utoronto.ca/religion/synopsis/ A. Similarities between the Synoptic Gospels 1. Common Material: Matthew Mark Luke Total Verses: 1,068 661 1,149 Triple Tradition (verses): 330 330 330 Double Tradition: 235 235 Note the similarity of the following pericopes: Matt 19:13-15/Mark 10:13-16/Luke 18:15-17 Matt 24:15-18/Mark 13:14-16/Luke 21:20-22 Matt 3:3; Mark 1:3; Luke 3:4 (Note the text of Isa 40:3 reads in the Septuagint: “Make straight the paths of our God,” and in the Hebrew “Make straight in the wilderness a highway for our God.”). Matthew 22:37; Mark 12:30; Luke 10:27 (This biblical quotation does not agree with the Hebrew text, which mentions heart and not mind, nor the Greek which never combines both heart and mind).1 2. Basic Agreement in Structure: Mark Matthew Luke a. Introduction to Ministry: 1:1-13 3:1-4, 11 3:1-4, 13 b. Galilean Ministry: 1:14-19, 50 4:12-18, 35 4:14-19, 50 c. Journey to Jerusalem: 10:1-52 19:1-20, 34 9:51-19:41 d. Death and Resurrection: chs. 11-16 chs. 21-28 chs. 19-24 3. Triple Tradition: An examination of “triple tradition,” reveals that while there is much material which is similar to all three Gospels, there is a good amount of material that show agreements between Matthew and Mark, and also Mark and Luke, but there is almost no material in the triple tradition that is common to Matthew and Luke (Matt 9:1-2; Mark 2:1-5; Luke 5:17-20).
    [Show full text]