Polyphenism in Insects Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polyphenism in Insects Review View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Current Biology 21, R738–R749, September 27, 2011 ª2011 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006 Polyphenism in Insects Review Stephen J. Simpson1, Gregory A. Sword2, and Nathan Lo1 cues. Until publication of Mayr’s 1963 book, however, envi- ronmentally induced phenotypic plasticity suffered the taint of Lamarckism and was largely ignored in favour of Polyphenism is the phenomenon where two or more the more respectable, or to use Mayr’s words, ‘‘more useful distinct phenotypes are produced by the same genotype. and precise’’ study of genetic polymorphisms, in which Examples of polyphenism provide some of the most phenotypic variants are produced by different rather than compelling systems for the study of epigenetics. Poly- the same genotypes [5]. phenisms are a major reason for the success of the Mayr’s definition of polyphenism was broadly inclusive of all insects, allowing them to partition life history stages manner of discontinuous and continuous phenotypes. Other (with larvae dedicated to feeding and growth, and adults definitions have been more restrictive. As pointed out by dedicated to reproduction and dispersal), to adopt Canfield and Greene [5], however, it is somewhat arbitrary different phenotypes that best suit predictable environ- to impose limits such as whether plastic phenotypes are mental changes (seasonal morphs), to cope with tempo- discrete or continuous [6], present within or between develop- rally heterogeneous environments (dispersal morphs), mental stages [7] or seasons [8], fixed rather than reversible and to partition labour within social groups (the castes of [9], or demonstrably adaptive rather than apparently offering eusocial insects). We survey the status of research no selective advantage. We are inclined to endorse Mayr’s on some of the best known examples of insect polyphen- more inclusive definition, especially given that what is ism, in each case considering the environmental cues known of the controlling mechanisms of polyphenisms does that trigger shifts in phenotype, the neurochemical and not support more restrictive definitional boundaries. As we hormonal pathways that mediate the transformation, the describe below, this is exemplified by the involvement of molecular genetic and epigenetic mechanisms involved the same developmental hormones that control insect in initiating and maintaining the polyphenism, and the metamorphosis in various environmentally induced poly- adaptive and life-history significance of the phenomenon. phenisms, including examples that are continuous or discrete We conclude by highlighting some of the common fea- in nature. Regardless of the definition used, the insects offer tures of these examples and consider future avenues for a marvellous array of examples of poylphenisms [10]. research on polyphenism. Where Does Polyphenism Occur among the Insects? Introduction Everywhere is the brief answer. The developmental stages of insects offer some of the most extraordinary examples, as seen in the transition from larva to pupa to adult in holome- ‘‘In order to make the term ‘polymorphism’ more useful tabolous (discontinuously developing) insects such as the and precise, there is now a tendency to restrict it Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), Coleoptera (beetles), to genetic polymorphism. Since this would leave nonge- Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps) and Diptera (true flies). netic variation of the phenotype without a designation, Additionally, there are seasonal morphs (exemplified by the the term ‘polyphenism’ is here proposed for it. Poly- aphids and Lepidoptera), density-dependent phenotypes phenism is discontinuous when definite castes are (the defining feature of the group of grasshopper species present (certain social insects) or definite stages in the known as locusts), plastic sexually selected phenotypes life cycle (larvae vs. adults; sexual vs. parthenogenetic) (for example, in horned beetles), and diet-mediated pheno- or definite seasonal forms (dry vs. wet; spring vs. types (as seen in some caterpillar morphs and in the castes summer). Polyphenism may be continuous, as in the of social insects), to mention only a selection [10]. cyclomorphosis of fresh-water organisms and some Indeed, polyphenisms are a major reason for the success other seasonal variation.’’ of the insects. They offer the opportunity for insects to deploy — Ernst Mayr [1] the same genome to partition life history stages (feeding larval stages versus reproducing, dispersing adults), to With this statement in 1963, Ernst Mayr helped return the adopt phenotypes that best suit predictable environmental study of phenotypic plasticity to respectability [1]. During changes (seasonal morphs) or what might be termed the late 1800s, August Weismann in Freiburg and Edward ‘predictably unpredictable’ environmental shifts such as Poulton at Oxford had shown the power of environmental the transformation of desert environments after unpredict- cues to change the phenotype in moths and butterflies able rain or the degradation of an environment by overcrowd- [2,3]. Later, working on helmet length (cyclomorphosis) in ing. Insects have even recruited polyphenism to partition clones of Daphnia, Leipzig biologist Richard Woltereck [4] labour within social groups, leading to some of the most introduced the term ‘reaktionsnorm’ (reaction norm) to successful animals on the planet, the eusocial insects. describe how the phenotype of an individual depends on Here we will leave aside insect developmental stages, the interaction between its genotype and environmental and instead focus upon some of the archetypal examples of environmentally induced polyphenisms. In discussing each case we will consider first the nature of the polyphenism, 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, then the sensory cues that trigger shifts in phenotype, the Australia. 2Department of Entomology, Interdisciplinary Faculty of neurochemical and hormonal pathways that mediate the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Texas A&M University, College transformation, and finally, the molecular genetic and epige- Station, TX 77843-2475, USA. netic mechanisms involved in initiating and maintaining the E-mail: [email protected] polyphenism. Additionally, where it is known, we will discuss Special Issue R739 Figure 1. The catkin (left) and twig (right) morphs in caterpillars of the moth Nemoria arizonaria (photo courtesy of Erik Greene). the adaptive significance and popula- tion-level consequences of the phenomenon. As we shall show, no single example is known exhaustively in all of these respects, but each system nevertheless illustrates important aspects of the general phenomenon. Seasonal and Diet-Induced Morphs in Lepidoptera Since the work of Poulton and Weis- man, the Lepidoptera have provided an abundant source of examples for polyphenism research [11]. Here we will consider two notable examples, the first concerning a remarkable larval polyphenism and the second involving adult butterflies. The genus Nemoria contains over 130 species of geome- however, is associated with the timing of development trid moths, all of which are found in the New World and rather than temperature per se. The key hormonal signals many of which are superb mimics of their host plants are circulating levels of ecdysteroids, whereas juvenile as caterpillars. The species N. arizonaria is a host-plant hormone (JH) appears not to be involved [14]. An abrupt specialist restricted to oak. The moth has two generations shift in the timing of peak concentrations of ecdysteroids each year, one in spring and the other in summer. Caterpil- in the haemolymph of the pupa occurs at larval develop- lars from the spring generation emerge when the oaks are mental temperatures between 21 and 23C. At 21C and in flower. They feed upon and develop into perfect physical below, the peak occurs later during pupal development mimics of oak flowers (catkins). The summer generation, (at 40% of pupal development) than it does at larval rearing by contrast, emerges onto oaks that are no longer in flower temperatures of 23C and higher (30% of pupal develop- and instead feed upon leaves. These caterpillars grow to ment). Hence, ecdysteroid release translates a continuous look like oak twigs. Adding to the effectiveness of this twig environmental cue (temperature) into a threshold phenotypic mimicry, when resting they anchor their hind ends and trait [14]. project their bodies outwards at an appropriately twig-like Experiments involving gene expression studies, use of angle (Figure 1). mutants, and surgical manipulations have uncovered the Greene and colleagues [12,13] showed that the catkin and mechanisms of eye-spot formation (reviewed in [11] and twig morphs are produced as a result of larval diet: young [15]). The initial formation of an eye-spot occurs by activation caterpillars fed catkins grow to be catkin mimics, whereas of a focal region of cells, which signal surrounding epidermal those fed leaves become twig mimics. Other environmental cells to seed the synthesis of pigment, leading to formation cues, such as day length, temperature, humidity and back- of an eye spot. The gene distal-less (Dll) is involved in stipu- ground colour, have no effect. Which aspect of food lation of a focal region [16]. Expression of genes such as chemistry is responsible for the developmental switch Dll appears to be regulated via levels of circulating
Recommended publications
  • Evolution of a Polyphenism by Genetic Accommodation
    REPORTS every generation, and approximately 60 with Evolution of a Polyphenism by the most desirable phenotypic response were selected to establish the subsequent generation. An unselected control line was heat-shocked Genetic Accommodation every generation to monitor any change that was not a direct result of selection. The re- Yuichiro Suzuki* and H. Frederik Nijhout sponse to selection (Fig. 2A) shows that the induced color change is heritable. The varia- Polyphenisms are adaptations in which a genome is associated with discrete alternative phenotypes tion in the phenotype is continuous rather than in different environments. Little is known about the mechanism by which polyphenisms originate. discrete, which indicates that the induced color We show that a mutation in the juvenile hormone-regulatory pathway in Manduca sexta enables change is under polygenic control. The mono- heat stress to reveal a hidden reaction norm of larval coloration. Selection for increased color phenic line lost its response to temperature change in response to heat stress resulted in the evolution of a larval color polyphenism and a shock after about the seventh generation of corresponding change in hormonal titers through genetic accommodation. Evidently, mechanisms selection and remained black thereafter, with that regulate developmental hormones can mask genetic variation and act as evolutionary little phenotypic response to heat shock. capacitors, facilitating the origin of novel adaptive phenotypes. The reaction norms of the three lines in the 13th generation are shown in Fig. 2B. The olyphenisms, such as the castes of social hormone (JH) secretion (17), which results in unselected control line has a narrow threshold insects, the solitary and gregarious phases an increased melanization of the larval epi- between 30-C and 33-C, with the inflection Pof migratory locusts, and the winged and dermis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptic Genetic Variation: Evolution's Hidden Substrate
    REVIEWS Cryptic genetic variation: evolution’s hidden substrate Annalise B. Paaby and Matthew V. Rockman Abstract | Cryptic genetic variation (CGV) is invisible under normal conditions, but it can fuel evolution when circumstances change. In theory, CGV can represent a massive cache of adaptive potential or a pool of deleterious alleles that are in need of constant suppression. CGV emerges from both neutral and selective processes, and it may inform about how human populations respond to change. CGV facilitates adaptation in experimental settings, but does it have an important role in the real world? Here, we review the empirical support for widespread CGV in natural populations, including its potential role in emerging human diseases and the growing evidence of its contribution to evolution. Standing genetic variation Cryptic genetic variation (CGV) is genetic variation alleles) and variance (that is, VA) parallels the difference 4 Genetic variation that is that normally has little or no effect on phenotypic vari- between compositional and statistical epistasis ; variants present in a population, as ation but that under atypical conditions, rare in the his- deal with the genotype–phenotype map, whereas vari- opposed to new mutations. tory of a population, generates heritable phenotypic ance concerns heritability in populations. Both forms Additive genetic variance variation. Although CGV is often perceived as mecha- are relevant to CGV. nistically special and mysterious, it is simply a subclass Early investigations into CGV and their implica- (VA). The transmissible or heritable component of the of variation with conditional effects, which has two tions are thoroughly discussed elsewhere2; here, we phenotypic variation of a well-studied forms: gene‑by‑gene (G × G) interactions, briefly summarize the historically provocative role of population.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Geometrinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Viidalepp, J.; Lindt, A. A new Rhanidopsis West, 1930 from the Malay Peninsula (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Geometrinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 38, núm. 149, marzo, 2010, pp. 97-106 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45514996008 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 97-106 A new Rhanidopsis West, 7/3/10 16:45 Página 97 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 38 (149), marzo 2010: 97-106 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 A new Rhanidopsis West, 1930 from the Malay Peninsula (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Geometrinae) J. Viidalepp & A. Lindt Abstract A new moth species from the oriental geometrid genus Rhanidopsis West, 1930 is described: R. kogeri Viidalepp & Lindt, sp. n., from Cameron Highlands, Peninsular Malaysia is added to the distribution area of the genus, formerly known from the Philippines and Borneo. Phenotypical similarity of the genus with Afrotropical Dargeia Herbulot, 1977 and Neotropical Pyrochlora Warren, 1895 is discussed. Some plesiomorphic characters of Neotropical and Indoaustralian genera of Nemoriini are compared. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Geometrinae, Pyrochlora, Dargeia, Rhanidopsis kogeri, new species, Malay Peninsula. Un nuevo Rhanidopsis West, 1930 de Malasia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Geometrinae) Resumen Se describe una nueva especie del género geométrido oriental Rhanidopsis West, 1930: R. kogeri Viidalepp & Lindt, sp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Predator-Induced Polyphenism in the Evolution of Cognition: a Baldwinian Speculation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Works Swarthmore College Works Biology Faculty Works Biology 2003 The Role Of Predator-Induced Polyphenism In The Evolution Of Cognition: A Baldwinian Speculation Scott F. Gilbert Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-biology Part of the Biology Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Scott F. Gilbert. (2003). "The Role Of Predator-Induced Polyphenism In The Evolution Of Cognition: A Baldwinian Speculation". Evolution And Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. 235-252. https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-biology/432 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered edited by Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew First MIT Press paperback edition, 2007 © 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or informa- tion storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email <special_sales @mitpress.mit.edu> or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Sabon by Achorn Graphic Services Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenotypic Robustness Can Increase Phenotypic Variability After Non
    Phenotypic robustness can increase phenotypic variability after non-genetic perturbations in gene regulatory circuits Carlos Espinosa-Soto∗1,2 Olivier C. Martin3 Andreas Wagner1,2,4 1 University of Zurich, Dept. of Biochemistry, Bldg. Y27 Winterthurerstrasse 190 CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland 2 The Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. Quartier Sorge, Batiment Genopode, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 3 INRA, UMR 0320 / UMR 8120 G´en´etique V´eg´etale, F-91190 Gif-sur- Yvette, France 4 The Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA Email: C. Espinosa-Soto∗ – [email protected]; O.C. Martin – [email protected] ; A. Wagner – [email protected] ∗ Corresponding author Abstract Non-genetic perturbations, such as environmental change or developmental noise, can induce novel phenotypes. If an induced phenotype confers a fitness advantage, selection may promote its genetic stabilization. Non-genetic perturbations can thus initiate evolutionary innovation. Genetic variation that is not usually phenotypically visible may play an important role in this process. Populations under stabilizing selection on a phenotype that is robust to mutations can accumulate such variation. After non-genetic perturbations, this variation can become a source of new phenotypes. We here study the relationship between a phenotype’s robustness to mutations and a population’s potential to generate novel phenotypic variation. To this end, we use a well-studied model of transcriptional regu- lation circuits. Such circuits are important in many evolutionary innovations. We find that phenotypic robustness promotes phenotypic variability in response to non-genetic perturbations, but not in response to mutation. Our work suggests that non-genetic perturbations may initiate innovation more frequently in mutationally robust gene expression traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Mechanisms of Threshold Evolution in a Polyphenic Beetle
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 4:4, 252–264 (2002) Developmental mechanisms of threshold evolution in a polyphenic beetle Armin P. Moczeka,b,* and H. Frederik Nijhouta aDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA, and bcurrent address: Center for Insect Science, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 *Correspondence (email: [email protected]) SUMMARY Polyphenic development is thought to play a (1) have to accumulate greater mass to become competent pivotal role in the origin of morphological novelties. However, to express the horned morph, (2) require more time to com- little is known about how polyphenisms evolve in natural pop- plete the final instar, (3) are less sensitive to the juvenile hor- ulations, the developmental mechanisms that may mediate mone (JH) analogue methoprene, and (4) exhibit a delay in such evolution, and the consequences of such modification the sensitive period for methoprene relative to other develop- for patterns of morphological variation. Here we examine the mental events. JH has been shown previously to control horn developmental mechanisms of polyphenism evolution in expression in this species. Our results show that threshold highly divergent natural populations of the dung beetle, On- evolution may be mediated via changes in the degree and thophagus taurus. Males of this species express two alterna- timing of sensitivity to JH and may result in correlated chang- tive morphologies in response to larval feeding conditions. es in the dynamics and duration of larval development. Favorable conditions cause males to grow larger than a Strain-specific differences in JH sensitivity have previously threshold body size and to develop a pair of horns on their been demonstrated in other insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Plants and Animals Differ in Phenotypic Plasticity?
    Do plants and animals differ in phenotypic plasticity? RENEE M BORGES Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India (Fax, 91-80-23601428; Email, [email protected]) This paper compares the flexibility in the nexus between phenotype and genotype in plants and animals. These taxa although considered to be fundamentally different are found to be surprisingly similar in the mechanisms used to achieve plasticity. Although non-cognitive behaviour occurs in plants, its range is limited, while mor- phological and developmental plasticity also occur to a considerable extent in animals. Yet both plants and ani- mals are subject to unique constraints and thus need to find unique solutions to functional problems. A true comparison between the plant and animal phenotype would be a comparison between plants and sessile photo- synthesizing colonial invertebrates. Such comparisons are lacking. However, they would provide important in- sights into the adaptive significance of plasticity in these groups. It is also suggested that a comparison of inflexible traits in these groups would provide an understanding of the constraints, as well as the costs and bene- fits, of a plastic versus non-plastic phenotype in plants and animals. [Renee M Borges 2005 Do plants and animals differ in phenotypic plasticity?; J. Biosci. 30 41–50] 1. Introduction plasticity that is expressed within the lifetime of an indi- vidual, then plants certainly show behaviour albeit of a It is not my intention to review the phenomenon of phe- non-cognitive nature (Silvertown 1998). In a seminal notypic plasticity in plants or in animals since excellent review, Silvertown and Gordon (1989) outlined a frame- recent reviews exist (Pigliucci 1996; Sultan 2000; Agrawal work for plant behaviour in which they presented various 2001; Givnish 2002; Grime and Mackey 2002; Novo- properties of stimuli and the abilities of plants to respond plansky 2002; Sachs 2002; Schlichting and Smith 2002; to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bui & Ragsdale, 2019
    Multiple Plasticity Regulators Reveal Targets Specifying an Induced Predatory Form in Nematodes Linh T. Bui1 and Erik J. Ragsdale *,1 1Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article-abstract/36/11/2387/5541796 by Indiana University Libraries - Bloomington user on 25 October 2019 Associate editor: Ilya Ruvinsky Raw sequencing reads are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SAMN12324532-SAMN12324547). Abstract The ability to translate a single genome into multiple phenotypes, or developmental plasticity, defines how phenotype derives from more than just genes. However, to study the evolutionary targets of plasticity and their evolutionary fates, we need to understand how genetic regulators of plasticity control downstream gene expression. Here, we have identified a transcriptional response specific to polyphenism (i.e., discrete plasticity) in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus.This species produces alternative resource-use morphs—microbivorous and predatory forms, differing in the form of their teeth, a morphological novelty—as influenced by resource availability. Transcriptional profiles common to multiple polyphenism-controlling genes in P. pacificus reveal a suite of environmentally sensitive loci, or ultimate target genes, that make up an induced developmental response. Additionally, in vitro assays show that one polyphenism regulator, the nuclear receptor NHR-40, physically binds to promoters with putative HNF4a (the nuclear receptor class including NHR- 40) binding sites, suggesting this receptor may directly regulate genes that describe alternative morphs. Among differ- entially expressed genes were morph-limited genes, highlighting factors with putative “on–off” function in plasticity regulation. Further, predatory morph-biased genes included candidates—namely, all four P.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Expression and the Evolution of Insect Polyphenisms
    Review articles Gene expression and the evolution of insect polyphenisms Jay D. Evans1* and Diana E. Wheeler2 Summary This review focuses on the processes that shape poly- Polyphenic differences between individuals arise not phenisms in insects, and the tools available to study them. through differences at the genome level but as a result of specific cues received during development. Polyphen- Insects reveal a special evolvability in regard to plasticities and (1,4) isms often involve entire suites of characters, as shown polyphenisms, relative to other animal groups. In many dramatically by the polyphenic castes found in many insect species, environmental variation during larval develop- social insect colonies. An understanding of the genetic ment leads to a continuum of variation in one or a few architecture behind polyphenisms provides a novel morphological traits. Grasshoppers, for example, develop means of studying the interplay between genomes, gene more robust head capsules, with greater bite strength, in expression and phenotypes. Here we discuss polyphen- (5,6) isms and molecular genetic tools now available to unravel response to increasing food toughness. A classic example their developmental bases in insects. We focus on several of a more complex, polyphenic, trait involves dimorphic oak recent studies that have tracked gene-expression pat- caterpillars, whose morphologies differ in response to diet and terns during social insect caste determination. BioEs- time of year. Here, caterpillar morphs are so strikingly different says 23:62±68, 2001. Published 2001 John Wiley & Sons, from each other that they were previously regarded as distinct Inc.y species.(7,8) Finally, social insect castes provide stunning (9) Introduction examples of complex and diversified polyphenism (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing with DNA and Flirting with the Ghost of Lamarck
    Biology and Philosophy (2007) 22:439–451 Ó Springer 2006 DOI 10.1007/s10539-006-9034-x Book review Dancing with DNA and flirting with the ghost of Lamarck MARY JANE WEST-EBERHARD Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, c/o Escuela de Biologı´a, Cı`udad Unı`versitaria, Costa Rica (e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +506-228-0001; fax: +506-228-0001) Review of: Evolution in Four Dimensions, Eva Jablonka and Marion J. Lamb, 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts Evolution in Four Dimensions, by Eva Jablonka and Marion Lamb, is a dis- armingly good-humored book that challenges the overly gene-centered ‘Neo- Darwinian’ (mid-20th-Century-Synthesis) view of evolution via selection on phenotypes affected by random changes in DNA. Their remedy, more palat- able by the end of the book than I expected at the beginning, is to propose that we revise and expand our ‘‘unidimensional’ vision of heredity. Heredity, they argue, occurs in four dimensions: genetic inheritance, the conventionally rec- ognized mode of inheritance via transmission of DNA; epigenetic inheritance, or transmission of non-genetic information from parental cells to daughter cells, as in the cytoplasm of an egg; behavioral inheritance, or cultural trans- mission of learned traits; and symbolic transmission of information by means of abstract representation, especially language in humans. All four modes of inheritance provide variants on which natural selection can act. Therefore they portray evolution as occurring in four dimensions, corresponding to the four dimensions of inheritance. The style of the book makes it accessible to an educated lay reader. The text has been unburdened by removal of bibliographic citations to a single section of notes at the end of the book, and by a series of dialogues with a make-believe Devil’s advocate named Ifcha Mistabra (in Aramaic, ‘‘The opposite conjecture’’), where the authors anticipate and answer potential confusions and objections to their main points.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner S Guide to Moths of the Midwest Geometers
    0LGZHVW5HJLRQ86$ %HJLQQHU V*XLGHWR0RWKVRIWKH0LGZHVW*HRPHWHUV $QJHOOD0RRUHKRXVH ,OOLQRLV1DWXUH3UHVHUYH&RPPLVVLRQ Photos: Angella Moorehouse ([email protected]). Produced by: Angella Moorehouse with the assistance of Alicia Diaz, Field Museum. Identification assistance provided by: multiple sources (inaturalist.org; bugguide.net) )LHOG0XVHXP &&%<1&/LFHQVHGZRUNVDUHIUHHWRXVHVKDUHUHPL[ZLWKDWWULEXWLRQEXWFRPPHUFLDOXVHRIWKHRULJLQDOZRUN LVQRWSHUPLWWHG >ILHOGJXLGHVILHOGPXVHXPRUJ@>@YHUVLRQ $ERXWWKH%(*,11(5¶6027+62)7+(0,':(67*8,'(6 Most photos were taken in west-central and central Illinois; a fewDUH from eastern Iowa and north-central Wisconsin. Nearly all were posted to identification websites: BugGuide.netDQG iNaturalist.org. Identification help was provided by Aaron Hunt, Steve Nanz, John and Jane Balaban, Chris Grinter, Frank Hitchell, Jason Dombroskie, William H. Taft, Jim Wiker,DQGTerry Harrison as well as others contributing to the websites. Attempts were made to obtain expert verifications for all photos to the field identification level, however, there will be errors. Please contact the author with all corrections Additional assistance was provided by longtime Lepidoptera survey partner, Susan Hargrove. The intention of these guides is to provide the means to compare photographs of living specimens of related moths from the Midwest to aid the citizen scientists with identification in the field for Bio Blitz, Moth-ers Day, and other night lighting events. A taxonomic list to all the species featured is provided at the end along with some field identification tips. :(%6,7(63529,',1*,'(17,),&$7,21,1)250$7,21 BugGuide.net LNaturalist.org Mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu Insectsofiowa.org centralillinoisinsects.org/weblog/resources/ :+,&+027+*8,'(7286( The moths were split into 6 groups for the purposes of creating smaller guides focusing on similar features of 1 or more superfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Diversity on Mount Mansfield
    Introduction identified to genus and four to species. The representation of the suborder Cyclorrhapha In 1991 a long term survey program comprised two divisions. Two families were was developed to record the insect present in the division Aschiza with three biodiversity on Mount Mansfield with Syphridae being identified to species and a respect to taxonomic composition and further 18 specimens unidentified. The abundance. Permanent survey traps were division Schizophora was represented by established to compare and contrast insect eight families, including Muscidae, diversity in three forests habitats. Calliphoridae, and Tachinidae. The taxonomic composition of the Two suborders of Hymenoptera are fauna is presented for the Diptera, represented. The suborder Symphyta Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera combined for comprised two sawfly families, Argidae and malaise and waterpan traps over 1991-1992 Tenthredinidae. The homtail family collecting season. The species of carabid Siricidae is represented by the common beetles collected from pitfall traps among pigeon tremex (Tremex calumba). The larger the three survey sites are given for 1991 and suborder Apocrita comprised 10 families 1992 respectively, and the Lepidoptera including a number of ichneumonid species collected from light traps are parasitoids that are not identified to species. tabulated for 1991. Two suborders of Coleoptera are represented. The Adephaga are limited to Methods the Carabidae (ground beetles) with 58 identified species (Table 1b). The remaining Sampling sites were established at beetles belong to the Polyphaga with twenty- 400m elevation (proctor Maple Research five families represented. The family Center) in a sugar maple forest, 600m Staphylinidae (rove beetles) comprise four (Underhill State Park) in a mixed hardwood specimens identified to genus and seven to forest, and 1160m (Mt.
    [Show full text]