Stained Glass Condition Report Holy Trinity Church Bradpole, Dorset
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Stained Glass Condition Report Holy Trinity Church Bradpole, Dorset Diocese of Salisbury Survey carried out 28th June 2019 and report compiled by Dan Humphries ACR Scope of survey and report: I was contacted by the inspecting architect and asked to liaise with the PCC with a view to inspecting all of the stained glass at Holy Trinity and providing a condition report for them with recommendations for any work required with priorities and quotes. Brief history of the church. From the church guidebook by Ivan Andrews, 4th edition Nov 2018 Holy Trinity Church was erected in 1845-6 as a completely new structure to replace a small medieval church, which was, at the same time, demolished… Building stone, additional to that taken from the old structure, was obtained from quarries at neighbouring Mangerton and Loders, and ‘dressings’ came from Ham Hill, near Yeovil… It then consisted of the main nave, chancel, north aisle in four bays… The vestry… now housing the organ, and the spire did not exist. The year 1897… (diamond jubilee year) … saw the church enlarged, improved and beautified by the addition of the north-east vestry, the erection of the erection of a decorated wrought iron and bronze chancel screen, and the painting of the murals. The distinctive arch mural, understood to be the largest of its kind in England at the time, and the chancel east wall were painted by Mr W G Rich. A double lancet window that existed in the east end of the north aisle and two single windows in the north wall of the chancel were naturally removed when the extension was added but re-used in the north and east walls of the new work. … the original stained glass window in the wall of the north aisle, being of a dark nature, were removed in the early 1950s to create more light for that side of the church. Attributions. Attributions are from www.stainedglassrecords.org, where Holy Trinity, Bradpole is listed under Southern Counties by Robert Eberhard. 2 CVMA Floorplan 3 Mail light dim.s Window I Date 1894 2@ 330 x 2750 Firm W G Rich?1 1@ 380 x 3250 Source Bridport News Narrative Crucifixion Memorial Rev Alex Broadley 15.6.1894 stainedglassrecords.org Condition notes Relatively good condition. The internal support bars have been replaced with non-ferrous but now insufficient ties remain. Bar paint has been carelessly splashed onto the glass. A repair piece has been inserted at Christ’s knees. The internal face of the glass is dirty (see above right). Upper b light is bowed by appx 10mm but is stable. Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Remove 24 bars, renew ties as necessary and re-fit Med £868 bars using hydraulic lime mortar • Carry out cleaning tests and clean internal face of Low £768 stained glass • Putty daylight gap at Mary’s knee – solder on lead Low £32 shield if required. 1 This seems to be a mistake. W G Rich was a painter, responsible for the two wall paintings. 4 Date stained glass Mail light dim.s probably around 1850 Window nII Firm Unknown combined with late 19thC 250 x 1930 squares Narrative Crucifixion and Memorial N A Source N A ascension Condition notes thin, flat plumbers lead to figurative glass, probably original, combined with later lead and painted and unpainted glass. • There is bowing to the diamond quarry panel at the base of b light, but no associated broken glass. • The bars have been replaced with non-ferrous, but there are insufficient ties to support the stained glass. • There are a couple of stable cracks to Mary’s robe. • Purple robe to a light is a repair plate applied to the inner surface. • The stained glass is quite dirty, especially higher up the window. • Some pieces of foliate painted glass are inside out, and the paint is in poor condition as a result. Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Remove 6 bars, renew ties as necessary and re-fit Med £192 bars using hydraulic lime mortar • Carry out cleaning tests and clean internal face of Low £64 stained glass • Remove lower quarry panels to both lights and re- Low £328 5 lead Mail light dim.s Window nIII Date unknown Firm Unknown 285 x 1850 Narrative Cross in mandorla Memorial N A Source N A Condition notes • Relatively recently re-leaded with new non-ferrous bars.19th C glass within the mandorla shape has been combined with later 20th C glass. • The dove at the head of the window appears to be 19th C but is now upside-down (see above right). • The ferrous, bottom hung casement is poorly designed and though recently decorated, is hampered by a single rusted hinge at the base which is preventing the casement from closing. The lower member of the fixed frame would ideally be reversed to shed water to the outside. • Some loss of glass paint to the dove and the foliate pieces. • Externally, there are 4 ferrous fixing left in the stone, perhaps from old wire guard fixings. These are rusting. Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Remove casement and make new in stainless steel Med £696 • Drill out ferrous fixings from external stone, point HIGH £133 with matching lime mortar 6 Mail light dim.s Window nIV Date unknown Firm N A 295 x 1850 Narrative instruments of the passion on 19th C foliate Memorial N A Source N A grisaille pattern Condition notes Little seen window hidden away behind the organ • various sized plumbers lead glazed quite slack; daylight visible around some pieces. • Most of the glass is inside-out and the glass paint is in very poor condition • The bars have been replaced with non-ferrous but are not well aligned with the leads and only 1 tie is actually attached from 3 bars! • Glass is very dirty to the inside face • A painted piece at the sill has been clumsily replaced with float glass and black silicone (see above right) • Externally, the hard cement fillet has failed in places • There are 4 ferrous stubs left in the external stone adjacent to the window Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Remove 3 bars, renew ties as necessary and re-fit Med £96 bars using hydraulic lime mortar • Carry out cleaning tests and clean internal face of Low £192 stained glass • This window will need re-leading soon and the Low N/A opportunity should be taken to lay out the glass properly with the glass paint to the inside 7 Mail light dim.s Window sII Date 1897 Firm Unknown 300 x 2450 Narrative 17th and 18th C Memorial A M Broadley Source N A vicars of Bradpole Condition notes Relatively good condition. • The internal support bars have been replaced with non-ferrous – in this case sufficient ties have been replaced. • The glass is a little dirty to the inner face Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Carry out cleaning tests and clean internal face of stained glass Low £256 8 Mail light dim.s Window sIII Date 1894 Firm W G Rich?2 300 x 2450 Source Bridport News Narrative St Paul Memorial Rev Alex Broadley 16.3.1894 stainedglassrecords.org Condition notes the face of St Paul (see above right) is a portrait of the Rev Alex Broadley. • Some minor paint-loss to foliate work • A few minor cracks that are stable • One star-break above St Paul’s head • The bars have been replaced with non-ferrous but inadequately tied. Of the three upper bars, only one is securely tied. Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Remove 6 bars, renew ties as necessary and re-fit Med £192 bars using hydraulic lime mortar • Carry out cleaning tests and clean internal face of Low £256 2 This seems to be a mistake. W G Rich was a painter, responsible for the two wall paintings. 9 stained glass 10 Mail light dim.s Firm Heaton Butler Window sIV Date 1897 405 x 3m & Bayne Memorial William and Fanny Source Stylistic attribution Narrative Good Shepherd Way stainedglassrecords.org Condition notes All relatively sound. • The bars have been replaced with non-ferrous, in this case a sufficient number of ties (though barely) have been re-used. • Internally, the stone moulding between the glass and the angled reveal is painted (unlike in the chancel where this stone has been left unpainted). This paint is blistering away from the stone (see above right) • Mild bowing to the upper and lower panels which is not currently cause for concern Suggested works Priority high / Quote med / low • Remove 6 bars, renew ties as necessary and re-fit low £192 bars using hydraulic lime mortar • Carry out cleaning tests and clean internal face of Low £256 stained glass • Carry out cleaning tests using Art Mundit latex Low £356 poultice and remove paint from stone profile adjacent to glass 11 • Allow to carry out mortar repairs if necessary Low £128 Mail light dim.s Window sV Date 1897 Firm Unknown 405 x 3m Memorial 7th Birthday F Narrative Mary Magdalene Source N A Bradley Condition notes Like some of the n windows, sV appears to incorporate elements that have less durable glass paint than the figurative work. These may be salvaged from the c.1850 glazing that was re-ordered elsewhere here, or simply pieces produced by the glass painters apprentice for use within borders. Here, as in the n windows much of this glass is placed inside-out. • Severe but localized loss of glass paint (see above right), especially to horizontal patterned strips • Numerous cracks to the borders, mostly stable • Blocked weep hole to lead sill • Internal angled sill has been repaired with gypsum plaster (lime would be preferable) • There are water run marks below the window and down its inner face • The bars have been replaced, some have sufficient ties to support the glazing, others don’t • Internally, the stone molding between the glass and the angled reveal is painted (unlike in the chancel where this stone has been left unpainted).