Monitoring Report 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 REDUCTION OF DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION IN TAMBOPATA NATIONAL RESERVE AND BAHUAJA- SONENE NATIONAL PARK WITHIN THE AREA OF MADRE DE DIOS REGION – PERU: MONITORING REPORT Document prepared by the Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral - AIDER Contact information: Jaime Nalvarte Armas Calle Las Camelias 174 Piso 6, Lima 27 – Perú Teléfono (511) 5956644 Reduction of deforestation and degradation in Tambopata National Project Title Reserve and Bahuaja-Sonene National Park within the area of Madre de Dion region –Perú Project ID 1067 Version 1 Report ID Date of Issue June-2018 Project Location Perú, Madre de Dios Principal Proponent of the project: Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral – AIDER Project Proponent(s) Contact: Jaime Nalvarte Armas Address: Calle Las Camelias 174, Piso 6 - San Isidro. Lima CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 1 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 Telephone: (511) 5956644 Email: [email protected] Prepared By Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral - AIDER Validation/Verification Body GHG Accounting/Crediting July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2030; 20 years Period Monitoring Period of this July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2017 Report History of CCB Status CCB Verification statement: July 27, 2016 Climate and Biodiversity The project Reduction of deforestation and degradation in the Tambopata National Reserve and the Bahuaja Sonene National Park of the Madre de Dios region - Peru has exceptional benefits to biodiversity by including, in the project area, sites with high priority for its conservation, as is the case of the Pampas of the Heath, which present globally significant source populations of the Crinose Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) and the deer of the marshes (Blastocerus dichotomus). Presence that has been confirmed for the current Gold Level Criteria verification period. In addition, the project generates benefits at the level of adaptation through the implementation of agroforestry systems in areas of reduced risk, using species that provide organic matter, prevent erosion, favor the labeling of the soil, etc. so that they are less susceptible to being affected by phenomena related to climate change and are viable alternatives for sustainability for the population. To the end of this period we have 1250 ha of agroforestry systems and a total of 358 beneficiaries. CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 2 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Project Benefits ............................................................................................. 4 1.1 Unique Project Benefits ............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Standardized Benefit Metrics .................................................................................................... 5 2 General................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Project Implementation Status ................................................................................................ 18 2.3 Stakeholder engagement ........................................................................................................ 29 2.4 Management Capacity and Best Practices .............................................................................. 30 2.5 Legal Status and Property Rights ............................................................................................ 37 3 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 44 3.1 Monitoring GHG Emission Reductions and Removals ............................................................ 44 3.2 Quantification of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals ................................................... 69 3.3 Optional Criterion: Climate Change Adaptation Benefits ......................................................... 77 4 Community ......................................................................................................................... 78 4.1 Net Positive Community Impacts............................................................................................. 78 4.2 Offsite Stakeholder Impacts .................................................................................................... 84 4.3 Community Impact Monitoring ................................................................................................. 85 4.4 Optional Criterion: Exceptional Community Benefits ............................................................... 96 5 BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................................................... 96 5.1 Net Positive Biodiversity Impacts ............................................................................................ 96 5.2 Offsite Biodiversity Impacts ................................................................................................... 104 5.3 Biodiversity Impact Monitoring .............................................................................................. 104 6 Additional Project Implementation Information........................................................... 115 7 Additional Project Impact Information .......................................................................... 115 Appendix : ................................................................................................................................ 122 CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 3 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT BENEFITS 1.1 Unique Project Benefits Achievements during the Achievements during the Outcome or Impact Monitoring Period Project Lifetime Section Reference 1) Estimated net emissions 945227.1 tCO2-e 2440376 tCO2-e reductions in the project area, generated by the project generated by the project measured with respect to the (period 2015-2017). (period 2010-2017). scenario without project. 2) Hectares of reduced forest 2154.3 hectares avoided 5885 hectares avoided loss in the project area, from deforestation from deforestation compared to the scenario (period 2015-2017). (period 2010-2017). without a project. 3) Critically endangered Any The species / objects of species worldwide or in danger conservation for of extinction that benefit from monitoring are not under reduced threats as a result of the category of "critical project activities, compared to danger" or "danger of the scenario without a project extinction". 4) 5) CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 4 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 1.2 Standardized Benefit Metrics Achievements during nce Achievements during the Category Metric Monitoring Period Project Lifetime Section Refere Net estimated No data available - No data available emission removals in the project area, measured against the without- project scenario Net estimated Ex post net 3.2.4 Ex post net emission anthropogeni anthropogen ic GHG reductions in the c GHG emission emission project area, Period reductions Period reductions measured against annual annual the without- t t project scenario tCO2-e tCO2-e 2010- 2015-2016 765062 165992 2011 2016-2017 180165 2011- 270079 Total 945227 2012 2012- 270079 2013 2013- 370903 2014 GHG emission reductions & removalsGHG emission reductions & 2014- 418096 2015 2015- 765062 2016 2016- 180165 2017 Total 2440376 CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 5 MONITORING REPORT: CCB Version 2, VCS Version 3 CCB Version 3, VCS Version 3 Achievements during nce Achievements during the Category Metric Monitoring Period Project Lifetime Section Refere 2 Superficie For REDD 3.2 Periodo projects: Number (ha) 2010- of hectares of Superficie 424.3 Periodo 2011 reduced forest (ha) 2011- 573.5 loss in the project 2015-2016 827.2 2012 area measured 2016-2017 1327.1 2012- 2013 788.1 against the Total 2154.3 without-project 2013- 2014 907.8 scenario 2014- 2015 1036.6 2015- cover 2016 827.2 1 2016- 2017 1327.1 Forest Total 5884.6 For ARR3 Not applicable - Not applicable projects: Number of hectares of forest cover increased in the project area measured against the without- project scenario Number of Not applicable - Not applicable hectares of ed land ement Improv manag existing 1 Land with woody vegetation that meets an internationally accepted definition (e.g., UNFCCC, FAO or IPCC) of what constitutes a forest, which includes threshold parameters, such as minimum forest area, tree height and level of crown cover, and may include mature, secondary, degraded and wetland forests (VCS Program Definitions) 2 Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) - Activities that reduce GHG emissions by slowing or stopping conversion of forests to non-forest land and/or reduce the degradation of forest land where forest biomass is lost (VCS Program Definitions) 3 Afforestation, reforestation and revegetation (ARR) - Activities that increase carbon stocks in woody biomass (and in some cases soils) by establishing, increasing and/or restoring vegetative cover through the planting, sowing and/or human-assisted natural regeneration of woody vegetation (VCS Program Definitions) CCB v2.0, VCS v3.4 6 MONITORING REPORT: