Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 32 Number 1 Winter 2010 Article 3 1-22-2010 Litigating the Pillage of Cultural Property in American Courts: Chabad v. Russian Federation and Lessons Learned Michael J. Bazyler Chapman University School of Law,
[email protected] Seth M. Gerber Bingham McCutchen LLP Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael J. Bazyler and Seth M. Gerber, Litigating the Pillage of Cultural Property in American Courts: Chabad v. Russian Federation and Lessons Learned, 32 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 45 (2010). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol32/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Litigating the Pillage of Cultural Property in American Courts: Chabad v. Russian Federation and Lessons Learned MICHAEL J. BAZYLER* AND SETH M. GERBER** Part and parcel of every genocide is looting and theft, including the plunder of cultural property of the particular group that was the victim of the genocide. Until the last century, such cultural plunder was considered a commonplace byproduct of war, with so-called "war booty" regarded, in the aftermath of a genocide or other massive atrocity, as property now rightfully belonging to the plunderer.1 The aftermath of the Nazis' unprecedented theft of Jewish assets2 and the assets of the conquered states during World War II changed this outlook.