Manulife Diversified Investment Fund1 BALANCED Series F · Performance As at August 31, 2021 · Holdings As at July 31, 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SBAI Annual Report (2017)
Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents Contents 1. Foreword ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. SBAI Mission ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3. The Alternative Investment Standards ............................................................................................... 8 Why are the Standards important? .................................................................................................... 8 4. The SBAI Toolbox .............................................................................................................................. 10 5. Overview of SBAI’s Activities in 2017/2018 ...................................................................................... 11 Key Highlights .................................................................................................................................... 11 Rebranding .................................................................................................................................... 11 North American Committee .......................................................................................................... 11 SBAI Toolbox ................................................................................................................................. 12 New SBAI Initiatives ..................................................................................................................... -
Mutual Fund Observer
Osterweis Strategic Investment Fund (OSTVX) David Snowball, Publisher This essay first appeared in the May 2021 issue of Mutual Fund Observer In celebration of the May 2021 10th anniversary of the Mutual Fund Observer, we are examining the achievements, a decade on, to the four funds highlighted in our first-ever issue. The Osterweis Strategic Investment Fund, which we categorized as a “most intriguing new fund” back then remains an under-covered gem. A “star in the shadows.” What they do Osterweis starts with a strategic allocation that’s 50% equities and 50% bonds. In bull markets, they can increase the equity exposure to as high as 75%. In bear markets, they Because they don’t like can drop it to as low as 25%. Their argument is that “Over long periods of time, we believe a static balanced allocation of 50% equities and 50% fixed income has the potential to playing by other provide investors with returns rivaling an equity-only portfolio but with less principal risk, lower volatility, and greater income.” Because they don’t like playing by other people’s people’s rules, the rules, the Osterweis team does not automatically favor intermediate-term, investment grade bonds in the portfolio. Since 2017, the fund’s equity exposure has ranged from Osterweis team does about 60–70%. not automatically How they’ve done favor intermediate- Over the past decade, the fund has averaged 9% annual returns, which does match the “equity-like” promise, at least if you use the stock market’s long-term average of about term, investment 10% per year. -
Form ADV Part 2A – Disclosure Brochure
Prosperity Advisory Group LLC Form ADV Part 2A – Disclosure Brochure Effective: October 12, 2020 This Form ADV Part 2A (“Disclosure Brochure”) provides information about the qualifications and business practices of Prosperity Advisory Group LLC (“PAG” or the “Advisor”). If you have any questions about the content of this Disclosure Brochure, please contact the Advisor at (585) 381-5900. PAG is a Registered Investment Advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information in this Disclosure Brochure has not been approved or verified by the SEC or by any state securities authority. Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill or training. This Disclosure Brochure provides information about PAG to assist you in determining whether to retain the Advisor. Additional information about PAG and its Advisory Persons is available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov by searching with the Advisor’s firm name or CRD# 310720. Prosperity Advisory Group LLC 50 Square Drive, Suite 220, Victor, NY 14564 Phone: (585) 381-5900 * Fax: (585) 381-0478 https://prosperityadv.com Item 2 – Material Changes Form ADV 2 is divided into two parts: Part 2A (the "Disclosure Brochure") and Part 2B (the "Brochure Supplement"). The Disclosure Brochure provides information about a variety of topics relating to an Advisor’s business practices and conflicts of interest. The Brochure Supplement provides information about the Advisory Persons of PAG. PAG believes that communication and transparency are the foundation of its relationship with Clients and will continually strive to provide you with complete and accurate information at all times. -
About EFAMA Publications Research and Statistics
Our site uses cookies so that we can remember you andR uensdeet Prsatsasnwdo rhdo wS iygon uIn use oSuera rschit eth.i sP sliteease read our cookies policy and privacy statement. By clicking OK, you accept our cookie and privacy policy. OK EFAMA Home About EFAMA Publications Research and Statistics About EFAMA Board of Directors (June 2019) EFAMA Secretariat Country Name Association/Company City Board of Directors President Nicolas CALCOEN Amundi AM PARIS Annual Reports V ice President M yriam VANNESTE Candriam Investor Group B RUSSELS Applying for Membership V ice President J arkko SYYRILÄ Nordea Wealth Management HELSINKI EFAMA Members Austria VÖIG VIENNA National Member Associations Armin KAMMEL Austrian Association of Investment Fund Management Companies Corporate Members Belgium Josette LEENDERS BEAMA BRUSSELS Associate Members Belgian Asset Managers Association Disclaimer Bulgaria Petko KRUSTEV BAAMC SOFIA Bulgarian Association of Asset Management Companies Contact C roatia Hrvoje KRSTULOVIĆ C roatian Association of Investment Fund Management Companies EFAMA ZAGREB 47 Rue Montoyer 1000 Brussels C yprus M arios TANNOUSIS C yprus Investment Funds Association N ICOSIA + 32 (0)2 513 39 69 Czech Republic Jana BRODANI AKAT CR PRAGUE + 32 (0)2 513 26 43 Czech Capital Market Association Contact Us Denmark Birgitte SØGAARD HOLM DIA COPENHAGEN Danish Investment Association Route & Details Finland Jari VIRTA The Finnish Association of Mutual Funds HELSINKI Click France Pierre BOLLON AFG PARIS for French Asset Management Association -
Arbitrage Pricing Theory∗
ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY∗ Gur Huberman Zhenyu Wang† August 15, 2005 Abstract Focusing on asset returns governed by a factor structure, the APT is a one-period model, in which preclusion of arbitrage over static portfolios of these assets leads to a linear relation between the expected return and its covariance with the factors. The APT, however, does not preclude arbitrage over dynamic portfolios. Consequently, applying the model to evaluate managed portfolios contradicts the no-arbitrage spirit of the model. An empirical test of the APT entails a procedure to identify features of the underlying factor structure rather than merely a collection of mean-variance efficient factor portfolios that satisfies the linear relation. Keywords: arbitrage; asset pricing model; factor model. ∗S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, forthcoming, Palgrave Macmillan, reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan. This article is taken from the authors’ original manuscript and has not been reviewed or edited. The definitive published version of this extract may be found in the complete The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics in print and online, forthcoming. †Huberman is at Columbia University. Wang is at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the McCombs School of Business in the University of Texas at Austin. The views stated here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Introduction The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) was developed primarily by Ross (1976a, 1976b). It is a one-period model in which every investor believes that the stochastic properties of returns of capital assets are consistent with a factor structure. -
Hedge Fund Standards Board
Annual Report 2018 Established in 2008, the Standards Board for Alternative Investments (Standards Board or SBAI), (previously known as the Hedge Fund Standards Board (HFSB)) is a standard-setting body for the alternative investment industry and custodian of the Alternative Investment Standards (the Standards). It provides a powerful mechanism for creating a framework of transparency, integrity and good governance to simplify the investment process for managers and investors. The SBAI’s Standards and Guidance facilitate investor due diligence, provide a benchmark for manager practice and complement public policy. The Standards Board is a platform that brings together managers, investors and their peers to share areas of common concern, develop practical, industry-wide solutions and help to improve continuously how the industry operates. 2 Table of Contents Contents 1. Message from the Chairman ............................................................................................................... 5 2. Trustees and Regional Committees .................................................................................................... 8 Board of Trustees ................................................................................................................................ 8 Committees ......................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Key Highlights ................................................................................................................................... -
Blackrock Income and Growth Investment Trust Plc August 2021
BlackRock Income and Growth Investment Trust plc August 2021 The information contained in this release was correct as at 31 August 2021. Key risk factors Information on the Company’s up to date net asset values can be found on the Capital at risk The value of London Stock Exchange website at: investments and the income from https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market- them can fall as well as rise and are news/market-news-home.html not guaranteed. Investors may not get back the amount originally Company objective invested. To provide growth in capital and income over the long term through The companies investments may be investment in a diversified portfolio of principally UK listed equities. subject to liquidity constraints, which means that shares may trade Fund information (as at 31/08/21) less frequently and in small volumes, for instance smaller companies. As a Net asset value - capital only: 201.64p result, changes in the value of investments may be more Net asset value - cum income*: 205.04p unpredictable. In certain cases, it may not be possible to sell the 189.00p security at the last market price Share price: quoted or at a value considered to be fairest. Total assets (including income): £48.0m The Company may from time to time Discount to NAV (cum income): 7.8% utilise gearing. A fuller definition of gearing is given in the glossary. Gearing: 5.9% The latest performance data can be found on the BlackRock Investment Net yield**: 3.8% Management (UK) Limited website at blackrock.com/uk/brig. -
INVESTMENT FUND SUMMARY July 2021
Investment Plan INVESTMENT FUND SUMMARY July 2021 Florida Retirement System July 2021 Florida Retirement System Build an Investment Portfolio That’s Right for You As an Investment Plan member, you get to choose how your account balance is invested. This brochure can help by making it easy for you Annual Fee Disclosure to understand and compare the Investment Plan funds available to you. On the following pages, you’ll find brief summaries of each fund, Statement Notice including the fund’s investment manager, objective, type, strategy, risk The Annual Fee Disclosure level, fees, and performance history. Statement for the Investment Plan provides information Get Help Choosing Investments concerning the Investment If you’d like help choosing investment funds, be sure to check out these Plan’s structure, administrative resources available to you as a member of the FRS. These services are and individual expenses, and confidential, unbiased, and completely FREE. investment funds, including performance, benchmarks, MyFRS Financial Guidance Line fees, and expenses. This statement is designed to set 1-866-446-9377 (TRS 711) forth relevant information in 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. ET simple terms to help you make Monday through Friday, except holidays better investment decisions. Call to speak with an experienced EY financial planner. These planners The statement is available work for you and they can help with any issue you think is important to online in the “Investment your financial future. Choose Option 2 for detailed information about all Funds” section on MyFRS.com, the investment funds. or you can request a printed copy be mailed at no cost MyFRS.com to you by calling the MyFRS This is your gateway to tools and information about your FRS Financial Guidance Line at retirement plan. -
Introduction and Overview of 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds
Introduction and Overview of 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds July 2013 Citi Prime Finance Introduction and Overview of 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds I. Introduction 5 II. Overview of Alternative Open-End Mutual Funds 6 Single-Manager Mutual Funds 6 Multi-Alternative Mutual Funds 8 Managed Futures Mutual Funds 9 III. Overview of Alternative Closed-End Funds 11 Alternative Exchange-Traded Funds 11 Continuously Offered Interval or Tender Offer Funds 12 Business Development Companies 13 Unit Investment Trusts 14 IV. Requirements for 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds 15 Registration and Regulatory Filings 15 Key Service Providers 16 V. Marketing and Distributing 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds 17 Mutual Fund Share Classes 17 Distribution Channels 19 Marketing Strategy 20 Conclusion 22 Introduction and Overview of 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds | 3 Section I: Introduction and Overview of 40 Act Liquid Alternative Funds This document is an introduction to ’40 Act funds for hedge fund managers exploring the possibilities available within the publically offered funds market in the United States. The document is not a comprehensive manual for the public funds market; instead, it is a primer for the purpose of introducing the different fund products and some of their high-level requirements. This document does not seek to provide any legal advice. We do not intend to provide any opinion in this document that could be considered legal advice by our team. We would advise all firms looking at these products to engage with a qualified law firm or outside general counsel to review the detailed implications of moving into the public markets and engaging with United States regulators of those markets. -
What Do Fund Flows Reveal About Asset Pricing Models and Investor Sophistication?
What do fund flows reveal about asset pricing models and investor sophistication? Narasimhan Jegadeesh and Chandra Sekhar Mangipudi☆ Goizueta Business School Emory University January, 2019 ☆Narasimhan Jegadeesh is the Dean’s Distinguished Professor at the Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, ph: 404-727-4821, email: [email protected]., Chandra Sekhar Mangipudi is a Doctoral student at Emory University, email: [email protected] . We would like to thank Jonathan Berk, Kent Daniel, Amit Goyal, Cliff Green, Jay Shanken, and the seminar participants at the 2018 SFS Cavalcade North America, Louisiana State University and Virginia Tech for helpful discussions, comments, and suggestions. What do fund flows reveal about asset pricing models and investor sophistication? Recent literature uses the relative strength of the relation between fund flows and alphas with respect to various multifactor models to draw inferences about the best asset pricing model and about investor sophistication. This paper analytically shows that such inferences are tenable only under certain assumptions and we test their empirical validity. Our results indicate that any inference about the true asset pricing model based on alpha-flow relations is empirically untenable. The literature uses a multifactor model that includes all factors as the benchmark to assess investor sophistication. We show that the appropriate benchmark excludes some factors when their betas are estimated from the data, but even with this benchmark the rejection of investor sophistication in the literature is empirically tenable. An extensive literature documents that net fund flows into mutual funds are driven by funds’ past performance. For example, Patel, Zeckhauser, and Hendricks (1994) document that equity mutual funds with bigger returns attract more cash inflows and they offer various behavioral explanations for this phenomenon. -
The Beta Anomaly and Mutual Fund Performance∗
The Beta Anomaly and Mutual Fund Performance Paul Irvine Jeong Ho (John) Kim Texas Christian University Emory University Jue Ren Texas Christian University February 7, 2019 Abstract We find evidence for the beta anomaly in mutual fund performance. This anomaly is not accounted for in the standard four-factor framework, nor by the addition of a BAB factor to the benchmark model. We show how controlling for the beta anomaly produces an alternative measure of managerial skill that we call active alpha. Active alpha is persistent and associated with superior portfolio performance. Therefore, it would be sensible for investors to reward managers with high active alpha. In addition to allocating their money based on standard alpha, we find that a subset of sophisti- cated investors allocate their assets to funds with high active alpha performance. We would like to thank Jeffrey Busse, Kevin Crotty, Jon Fulkerson, Tong Xu, James Yae, Virgilio Zurita, seminar participants at Emory University and Fudan University, and participants at the KAEA-ASSA 2018 Workshop, the MFA 2018 Annual Meeting, the 2018 EFA Annual Meeting, the GCFC2018, and the 2018 Lone Star Finance Conference for their comments. We apologize for any errors remaining in the paper. Corresponding author: John Kim, Emory University, 1602 Fishburne Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Introduction The empirical asset pricing literature supplies convincing evidence that high-beta assets often deliver lower expected returns than predicted by the CAPM, and that lower beta assets deliver returns higher than expected according to the CAPM (Black, Jensen, and Scholes (1972), Gibbons, Ross, and Shanken (1989), Baker, Bradley, and Wurgler (2011)). -
Management Alert
Management Alert New Commodity Pool Rules May Require Immediate Action by 401(k) Plans New regulations adopted in 2012 by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) may require 401(k) plans that had previously registered as exempt from CFTC regulation to renew their exemption on an annual basis, with the first renewal being due by March 1. In addition, some plans which have not previously registered may need to do so. In addition to traditional agricultural commodities, the CFTC regulates financial futures, including the type of futures contracts often used for hedging purposes by stock and bond funds. Under the CFTC rules, any investment fund that invests in futures contracts is potentially classified as a “commodity pool”, and any person engaged in the operation of a commodity pool may be considered a “commodity pool operator”, required to be registered with and regulated by the CFTC. A 401(k) investment fund whose advisers use futures as part of their trading strategy (other than solely through investment in a mutual fund) could be considered a “commodity pool” under this definition, which would make the fiduciaries of the 401(k) plan subject to regulation as commodity pool operators. The CFTC regulations provide that the fiduciaries of a retirement plan subject to ERISA are generally exempt from registration as commodity pool operators. However, if the plan provides for employee contributions, such as a 401(k) plan, the plan fiduciaries are required to file a statement with the CFTC claiming the exemption. Prior to 2012, this was a one-time filing. However, in 2012 the CFTC changed the regulations to require any person claiming an exemption from regulation to file an annual statement within 60 days after the end of each year confirming that it still qualifies for the exemption.