Case Service Reporting Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Service Reporting Handbook Legal Foundation of Washington CASE SERVICE REPORTING HANDBOOK A WORD ABOUT NUMBERS There is a common myth among many grantseekers that funding sources are only interested in data. While LFW trustees do care that as many clients receive quality services as possible, they will also tell you that quality of service matters more to them than quantity of client service contacts. When a difficult-to-place client comes into your office do you make a concerted effort to find an attorney who will provide direct representation? Do you go out of your way to recruit new volunteers or rejuvenate current members of your existing panels? Do you work with other Alliance partners to maximize service opportunities to clients? These issues are more important to LFW than the number of clients you serve, and will be captured in your narrative report. KEY DEFINITIONS Case A case is defined as the provision of legal assistance to an eligible client with a single legal problem, or a set of closely related legal problems. Case opened All Legal Foundation of Washington grantees should open a case when the following details are true: 1. The client is financially eligible to receive assistance; 2. The client’s case is within program priorities; 3. Your program has actually accepted the client for service through its intake system or another established procedure for ensuring client eligibility. Case Closed Programs should close a case once the legal service has been completed—e.g., the client has attended a pro se or advice clinic; received a brief service; or received direct representation from an attorney. If a client attends multiple advice clinics or receives additional legal help for the same legal problem, the case counts as one case. Some programs keep cases open for a brief period after a clinic to see if the client returns for the same problem. Or, if programs have already closed the case, programs may reopen the same case if the client returns. In order to correctly report closed cases, you will need to follow up periodically with your volunteer attorneys to find out when referred clients’ cases have closed. Legal Server allows you to generate form letters at pre-determined intervals to assist you in this process. Note that cases should not be “closed” if the person does not receive legal assistance (except for Category M). Instead those cases should be “rejected” in Legal Server. Program should select the reason for the rejection, which may include the person withdrew, the person was not eligible for help, or the program was unable to find an attorney to represent the person. Client A client is defined as a person (or an eligible community group) who is: 1. Eligible for legal assistance; and 2. Accepted for assistance through an intake system or other established program procedure for ensuring client eligibility. TYPES OF CASE SERVICES Case Service Definitions On the next page of this handbook you will find a definition for each of the categories for reporting to the Legal Foundation of Washington. When closing individual cases, programs should report each case once according to the type of case service (i.e., reason for closure) which best reflects, in your judgment, the highest level of assistance that the program provided during the course of the case. Cases Involving Multiple Levels of Assistance If your program attempts to resolve essentially the same problem for a client more than once in the same reporting period, you should only report the highest level of assistance, even when you provide more than one type of assistance. For example: a client comes in and is referred to a pro se divorce clinic. The client attends the divorce clinic, but doesn’t follow through with the paperwork and the situation gets worse. The client comes back to the program, and is then referred to an attorney for full representation. This would count as one direct representation case. For example: a client comes in about a benefits problem and you find out he’s also seeking a dissolution. You refer the client to a volunteer lawyer for representation at an administrative hearing, and you also refer the client to a pro se divorce clinic. This would count as two cases. Cases Involving Repeated Requests for the Same Legal Problem When a program provides assistance more than once during the grant year to an eligible client who has returned to the program with essentially the same legal problem, as demonstrated by the facts giving rise to the problem, the program should report the repeated instances of assistance to the client as a single case. But if the case is closed prior to the end of the grant year and the client returns the following year with the same problem, you may open a new file. For example: A landlord repeatedly fails to make repairs on an apartment. The apartment dweller calls your program every month with a new habitability complaint. You arrange for the client to receive brief services at an advice clinic each time. This would count as a one case. Cases Involving Related Legal Problems Programs should report related legal problems of an eligible client as a single case when the program representing the client attempts to resolve the related legal problems simultaneously through a single legal process. Example: A client comes to your program with related child custody and support problems. You refer him to an attorney who prepares a pleading or other document that addresses both problems. This would count as one case. CASE DEFINITIONS AND CLOSURE CATEGORIES CSR Category A: Counsel and Advice A case should be closed as “Counsel and Advice” if an attorney (or paralegal under an attorney’s supervision) ascertained and reviewed relevant facts, exercised judgment in interpreting those facts and in applying the relevant law, and counseled the client concerning his or her legal problem. CSR Category B: Limited Action A case should be closed as “Limited Action” if an attorney (or paralegal under an attorney’s supervision) prepares relatively simple or routine documents and interacts relatively briefly with other parties on behalf of an eligible client. (More complex and/or extensive cases that would otherwise be closed in this category should be closed in the new CSR Closure Category L – Extensive Service). Examples of Limited Action include: communications by letter, telephone or other means to a third party; preparation of a simple legal document such as a routine will or power of attorney; or legal assistance to a pro se client that involves assistance with preparation of court or other legal documents. CSR Category F: Negotiated Settlement Without Litigation A case closed in which an attorney (or paralegal under an attorney’s supervision) negotiated and reached an actual settlement on behalf of a client without any court or administrative actions pending. This category should be reserved for cases in which the program conferred with another party to as to reach a resolution of the client’s legal problem. This category includes settlements negotiated with an administrative agency prior to the filing of a formal administrative proceeding. CSR Category G: Negotiated Settlement With Litigation A case closed in which an attorney (or paralegal under an attorney’s supervision) negotiated and reached an actual settlement on behalf of a client while a court or formal administrative action was pending. This category should be reserved for cases in which the program conferred with another party to as to reach a resolution of the client’s legal problem. Settlements of pending court or administrative actions should be closed in this category even if the court or administrative agency issues an order memorializing the settlement. CSR Category H: Administrative Agency Decision A case closed in which an attorney (or paralegal under an attorney’s supervision or, in certain limited circumstances permitted by the administrative agency, a non-attorney advocate) represented a client in an administrative agency action that resulted in a case-dispositive decision by the administrative agency or body, after a hearing or other formal administrative process (e.g. a decision by the hearings office of a welfare department). This category does not include settlement made during the course of litigation that are then approved by the administrative agency, voluntary dismissals or the grant of a motion to withdraw as counsel. CSR Category I: Court Decision. A case closed in which an attorney represented a client in a court proceeding that resulted in a case dispositive decision made by the court. This category is divided into the following three subcategories: a. Uncontested Court Decisions – either with no adverse party or the adverse party does not contest the case; b. Contested Court Decisions – there is an adverse party and that party contests the case; c. Appeals – to an appellate court taken from a decision of any court or tribunal. This category does not include appeals or writs taken from administration agency decisions or lower trial court decisions to a higher level trial court acting as an appellate court, whether they are on the record or de novo proceedings. (Those cases should be closed once as Category I.b. – Contested Court Decisions.) CSR Category K: Other Even though this is a Legal Server closing category, it should not be used. Cases receiving some level of legal help should be closed in the other categories, using the closest fit even if there is some gray area. And if a client went through intake but did not receive legal help, their file should not be closed as a case, but instead “rejected.” After you click “Reject” (which is something of a misnomer) then the reason may be selected, including if the case was referred to another program or the client withdrew or did not return.
Recommended publications
  • Glossary of Legal Terms
    GLOSSARY OF LEGAL TERMS This glossary defines a number of terms in common legal use. Many books on the law for non-lawyers contain glossaries. Check your library or bookstore. See especially, Lile Denniston’s The Reporter and the Law (New York: Hastings House, 1980), Barron’s Dictionary of Legal Terms (New York: Barron’s Educational Series, 1998) and Black’s Law Dictionary (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis). acquittal A finding of “not guilty,” certifying the innocence of a person charged with a crime. adversary system The trial methods used in the U.S. and some other countries, based on the belief that the trust can best be determined by giving opposing parties full opportunity to present and establish their evidence, and to test by cross-examination the evidence presented by their adversaries, under established rules of procedure before an impartial judge and/or jury. alternative dispute resolution Processes that people can use to help resolve conflicts rather than going to court. Common ADR methods include mediation, arbitration and negotiation. Amicus curiae A friend of the court; one not a party to the case who volunteers to offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it. appeal A request by the losing party in a lawsuit that the judgment be reviewed by a higher court. appellant The party who initiates an appeal. Sometimes called a petitioner. appellate court A court having jurisdiction to hear appeals and review a trial court’s decision. appellee The party against whom an appeal is taken, sometimes called a respondent.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Introduction to American Legal Case Reading and Discussion
    Rei32020_Read1.qxd 1/30/07 2:44 PM Page 1 PART 1 INTRODUCTION TO AMERICAN LEGAL CASE READING AND DISCUSSION Rei32020_Read1.qxd 1/30/07 2:44 PM Page 2 Reading 1 The United States Legal System— The Courts and the Law Hierarchy of State and Federal Courts In the United States, state and federal constitutions provide for the establishment of the court system and give courts judicial power. The federal court system and most state court systems organize their courts in a hierarchy consisting of lower- level or trial courts, appellate courts, and a supreme court (see Figs. 1 and 2). Jurisdiction If a court has subject-matter jurisdiction, it has the authority to adjudicate or deter- mine the outcome of a legal matter. The Constitution of the United States, to bal- ance the power of the federal and state governments, specifically limits the scope of jurisdiction over the types of cases that federal courts may hear. Thus, it can be said that federal courts have limited jurisdiction. Under Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, their jurisdiction includes, among other things, all cases “arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties,” controversies in which the United States is a party and “Controversies between two or more States” or “Citizens of different States.” Also considered courts of limited or special jurisdiction are those courts that, by statute, are limited to particular types of cases they can hear—for example, state probate and juvenile courts. State courts may be regarded as courts of general jurisdiction because they have the authority to hear a broader range of cases.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the American Legal System
    New Hampshire Bar Association’s Law-Related Education Program Presents An Overview of the American Legal System A Guide for Classroom Use To Be Used in Conjunction with the Mock Trial Competition Handbook (Revised September 2004) Developed by the New Hampshire Bar Association’s Law-Related Education Program, sponsored in part by the New Hampshire Bar Association and the New Hampshire Bar Foundation. Please feel free to contact the NHBA’s Law Related Education Coordinator, Robin E. Knippers at (603) 224-6942 ext. 3259 or at [email protected], or visit our website at www.nhbar.org for more information. We welcome your comments and suggestions at any time. i Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................. 4 Overview of the Judicial System ........................................................................................... 5 I. .................................................................................................................... The Role of Courts 5 II. .............................................................................. The State and Federal Court Systems 5 A. The State Court System................................................................................... 5 1. The Various Levels of the State Court System.............................. 5 2. Selection of State Court Judges........................................................8 B. The Federal Court System ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Rights in the New Somalia
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Women’s Rights in the New Somalia: Best Practice Guidelines for MPs and CSOs ! ! ! Legal Aid Providers Supporting Survivors of Gender Based Violence in Somalia ! ! Women’s(Rights(in(the(New(Somalia:( Best(Practice(Guidelines(for(MPs(and(CSOs! ( ! ! ! Women’s Rights in the New Somalia: Best Practice Guidelines for MPs and CSOs January 2014 This report was prepared by Legal Action Worldwide (LAW). It was commissioned by IIDA Women’s Development Organization Project, and funded by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The!contents!of!this!report!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!views!of!the!UNDP!or!the!UNFPA.! Women’s Development Organization (IIDA) IIDA is a non-profit organization that was founded in 1991 in Mogadishu by a group of Somali women leaders to promote women’s political, economic and social rights. IIDA formulates women- led programs that are geared towards making a lasting impression on the lives of Somali women both at home and in the Diaspora. Its mission is to promote peace and work towards non-violent means of conflict resolution, to foster and ensure the integration of Somali women in all sectors of their society, to promote education for women and the youth, to enhance women's economic self-sustenance and improve women’s health. IIDA is the largest grassroots movement in Somalia. It is able to resourcefully and successfully penetrate the grassroots, even in times when international organizations are unable to do so due to security concerns. Legal Action Worldwide LAW is an independent, non-profit organisation comprised of a network and think tank of prominent human rights lawyers and advisors.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions for Legal Assistance Request Form Thank You for Contacting the ACLU of Kentucky
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KENTUCKY 325 W. Main Street SUITE 2210 LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3820 T 502-581-1181 | F 502-526-4443 WWW.ACLU-KY.ORG Instructions for Legal Assistance Request Form Thank you for contacting the ACLU of Kentucky. Once you return this complaint form to our office, we will review your information to determine if your complaint fits within our mission and if we have the resources to help you. Please be aware that this process can take six to eight weeks. The ACLU of Kentucky offers legal assistance for cases involving civil liberties violations in which government is involved. The ACLU of Kentucky does not handle: • disputes between private parties, including private employment disputes; • domestic disputes, or • child custody matters. Due to limited resources, the ACLU of Kentucky cannot take all cases offered to us, even some concerning real injustices. If we do not take your complaint, this does not necessarily mean that you do not have a valid constitutional concern. Because we are a small organization with limited resources, we often have to make difficult decisions when choosing the types of issues that we can adequately address. In order to expedite our intake process, do not attach any additional documentation to the complaint form. We cannot return any documents that you choose to send to us. Please note that by filling out this request for assistance, the ACLU of Kentucky is not undertaking your legal representation and is not responsible for meeting any statute of limitations restrictions in your case. If you believe you have a potential lawsuit, you should consult with an attorney immediately to ensure that you do not lose the right to bring a legal case due to any applicable time deadlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Filing a Motion for Contempt in a Parentage Case
    Filing a Motion for Contempt in a Parentage Case Instructions and Forms July 2011 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................1 A. How much does a Motion for Contempt cost? .....................................................2 B. Where should my motion be filed?.......................................................................2 C. What if I have questions that this packet does not answer? ................................2 D. What if the other party is in the military or the dependent of someone in the military? ...............................................................................................................2 Section 2: Words You May Need to Know .....................................................................4 Section 3: Steps to Take to File and Argue a Motion for Contempt.............................9 Section 4: Forms in this Packet ....................................................................................12 A. To file for contempt you’ll need the following forms from this packet: ................12 B. Depending upon the case and the evidence, you may also need:.....................12 Section 5: What Other Forms And Documents Will I Need That Aren’t In This Packet? ......................................................................................................13 Section 6: Follow These General Instructions Before You Begin To Fill Out Any of the Forms ..............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF 902.35 KB
    Women’s Legal Agency and Property in the Court Records of Late 19th-Century Brava © Lidwien Kapteijns and Alessandra Vianello For the published version of this essay, see Kapteijns, Lidwien and Alessandra Vianello. “Women’s Legal Agency and Property in the Court Records of Late Nineteenth-Century Brava.” History in Africa, 2017, pp. 1–65., doi:10.1017/hia.2017.2. Abstract Drawing on the Islamic court records of Brava, a small Indian Ocean port city on the southern Benadir coast of Somalia, dating from the period 1893-1900, this essay analyzes the legal agency and economic roles of the women of Brava and sheds new light on social (especially family) relations in this town. The qāḍī’s court records give evidence of married women’s fully recognized (even if qualified) legal personhood and their full-fledged financial and economic agency. The free, married women of Brava of this period contributed fully and autonomously to the economic endeavors of their families and also interacted with non-related businessmen in and beyond Brava. They also had the legal and social capacity to defend their interests in court and to get a fair hearing in accordance with the law. Given that both Somali women’s history and East African legal history suffer from a scarcity of concrete evidence for this time-period, the aspects of everyday life in Brava that come into view in the town’s qāḍī’s court records are of great interest. INTRODUCTION1 1 We thank SHARIAsource, the research venture of the Islamic Legal Studies Program at Harvard University, and reviewers for History in Africa for helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Uncertainty Anthony D'amato Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected]
    Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Working Papers 2010 Legal Uncertainty Anthony D'Amato Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation D'Amato, Anthony, "Legal Uncertainty" (2010). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 108. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/108 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Legal Uncertainty, by Anthony D'Amato*, 71 California Law Review 1-55 (1983) Abstract: Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in content and in application because legal systems are biased in favor of unravelling those rules and principles. In this article I attempt to show what these biases are, and why commentators who have argued that the law tends toward certainty are wrong, then describe various attempts which have been made at restoring certainty, and why these attempts have generally not worked. My conclusion is that these proposals are at best holding actions, and that the tendency toward increasing uncertainty in the law is inexorable. Tags: legal certainty, legal uncertainty, judicial discretion, Case Revision Commission [pg1]** Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in content and in application because legal systems are biased in favor of unravelling those rules and principles. In Part I of this Article, I attempt to show what these biases are, and why commentators who have argued that the law tends toward certainty are wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Persuading with Precedent: Understanding and Improving Analogies in Legal Argument Jacob M
    PERSUADING WITH PRECEDENT: UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING ANALOGIES IN LEGAL ARGUMENT JACOB M. CARPENTER* I. INTRODUCTION When writing persuasive briefs, attorneys use comparisons—metaphors or case-based analogies—to help explain their analyses and support their positions.1 Cognitive science shows that readers process information both by metaphor and by analogy in much the same way.2 But attorneys use the two types of comparisons for very different purposes.3 Metaphors occasionally can be helpful in certain briefs, but case-based analogies are critical in most briefs4 because of the American legal system’s reliance on precedent and stare decisis.5 Several legal scholars have explored how attorneys use metaphors in their legal writing.6 Although the existing scholarship on legal metaphors is Copyright © 2016, Jacob M. Carpenter. * Associate Professor of Legal Writing, Marquette University Law School. I would like to thank Professor Michael Smith, University of Wyoming School of Law, for encouraging me to write this Article when I first discussed the topic with him; Professor Linda Edwards, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Law, for her constant support; and the Marquette University Law School administration for their support of this Article. 1 GEORGETOWN UNIV. WRITING CTR., WHAT DO YOU MEAN “THERE’S MORE THAN ONE WAY TO DO IT”? SELECTING METHODS OF LEGAL ANALYSIS THAT WORK BEST 1 (2004), https://www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/academic-programs/legal-writing- scholarship/writing-center/upload/legalanalysismethods.pdf. 2 See MICHAEL R. SMITH, ADVANCED LEGAL WRITING: THEORIES AND STRATEGIES IN PERSUASIVE WRITING 199 (2d ed. 2008) (quoting EDWARD P.J. CORBETT & ROBERT J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survivor's Guide to Filing a Civil Law Suit
    A SURVIVOR’S GUIDE TO FILING A CIVIL LAW SUIT Presented by WA Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs This project was supported by Grant Number 2001-WL-BX-0036 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. A publication of the Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs Olympia, WA. 2004 The Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs (WCSAP) is a statewide network of community- based sexual assault programs that work together to provide general advocacy, medical and legal advocacy, information and referral, and public education regarding sexual violence. Through its administrative office, WCSAP supports its member programs, works with state and national organizations to end sexual violence and produces publications such as this guide. We gratefully acknowledge the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault (ICASA) for allowing us to use their original guide as a basis for the Washington State version. We would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations who assisted ICASA in the original version of this publication: • Sarah Hatch, a student from the University of Illinois College of Law, for researching and writing the guide. • Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis Services, Inc. for generously allowing the use of its civil lawsuit guide. • Lyn Schollett, Staff Attorney of ICASA, for editing the guide. • Cynthia Bowman, Joe Klest, Sara Love, Helen McGonigle, Polly Poskin, Marcia Rudin and Shawn Schenk for reviewing and commenting on the guide during its production.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Criminal Proceedings and Defence Rights in Spain
    INFORMATION ON CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AND DEFENCE RIGHTS IN SPAIN This leaflet covers: Information about FTI Definitions of key legal terms Criminal proceedings and defence rights in Spain Useful links This booklet was last updated in February 2013 1 About Fair Trials International Since 1992 Fair Trial International has worked for the better protection of fair trial rights and defended the rights of people facing criminal charges in a country other than their own. Our vision is a world where every person’s right to a fair trial is respected, whatever their nationality, wherever they are accused. Fair Trials International was established to help people arrested outside their own country to defend their right to a fair trial. Every year we help hundreds of people and their families to navigate a foreign legal system by offering practical advice, including contacts of local lawyers; guidance on key issues encountered by people arrested abroad; and basic information on different legal systems and local sources of support. As a charity, we do not charge for any of the assistance that we provide. We believe that respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law are the hallmarks of a just society and that the right to a fair trial is at the heart of this. Sadly too many shocking cases of injustice demonstrate how, time and again, this most basic human right is being abused. We fight against injustice by lobbying for the legal reforms needed to ensure that the right to a fair trial is respected in practice. Working with our clients and international networks, we also campaign for changes to criminal justice laws which are being abused and overused.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Civil Legal Cases in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado
    Civil Lawsuit Guide – Eff. Dec. 1, 2020 Guide to Civil Legal Cases in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado This Guide is not legal advice. It is for informational purposes only. 1 | Page Civil Lawsuit Guide – Eff. Dec. 1, 2020 All of us at the United States District Court for the District of Colorado share the same goals as our late Chief Judge Alfred A. Arraj, the person for whom this courthouse was named. We are committed to administering justice in a fair and timely way. We do not discriminate based on race, beliefs, or social standing. We hope this Guide will give you greater access to our court. Table of Contents Starting a Civil Case Without a Lawyer .................................................................................. 4 Things to Consider Before Starting Your Case ....................................................................10 Filing a Civil Case ...................................................................................................................14 Civil Case Roadmap ................................................................................................................20 The Court Clerk’s Office .........................................................................................................36 Legal Resources & Help ........................................................................................................39 Court Locations, Fees, and Rules of Procedure ...................................................................42 Common Legal Terms
    [Show full text]