DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 BSC Antibiotics.Pptx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 BSC Antibiotics.Pptx OPHTHALMIC ANTIMICROBIALS Alison Clode, DVM, DACVO Port City Veterinary Referral Hospital Portsmouth, New Hampshire New England Equine Medical and Surgical Center Dover, New Hampshire Overview • Interpretation of efficacy • Mechanisms of resistance • Antibacterial agents • Mechanism of action • Applications in ophtho • Antifungal agents • Mechanism of action • Applications in ophtho Interpretation of Efficacy – in vitro 1. MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration • Lowest concentration of antibiotic that inhibits growth of a specific organism 2. MBC = minimum bactericidal concentration • Lowest concentration of an antibiotic at which bacteria are killed 3. Breakpoint • Antibiotic concentration dividing susceptible and resistant • MIC < breakpoint à S • MIC ≥ breakpoint à I, R Interpretation of Efficacy – in vivo 4. PK/PD = pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the drug) pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) 5. Susceptible = bacteria inhibited by usually achievable concentrations of antibiotic when recommended dose used for particular site of infection 6. Intermediate = bacteria inhibited in sites were antibiotic is physiologically concentrated or when higher-than-normal dosage can be used 7. Resistant = bacteria not inhibited by usually achievable concentrations of antibiotic with normal dosing schedules or when microbial resistance mechanisms are likely Interpretation of Efficacy • Indices utilized: • T > MIC = % time plasma concentration is above MIC • Cmax/MIC = max plasma concentration relative to MIC • AUC/MIC = plasma concentration time curve (duration of drug exposure) relative to MIC • Determined by various animal models www.rxkinetics.com Time- versus Concentration-Dependent www.slideshare.net Mechanisms of Resistance • Intrinsic to the bacteria • Acquired by the bacteria Acquired Mechanisms of Resistance 1. Modification of the antibiotic 2. Preventing antibiotic from reaching target 3. Modification of the target Acquired Mechanisms of Resistance 1. Modification of the antibiotic • Enzyme-induced damage to antibiotic à inactive antibiotic • Enzyme-induced acetylation, adenylation, phosphorylation of antibiotic à alter affinity of antibiotic for target Acquired Mechanisms of Resistance 2. Prevent antibiotic from reaching target • Preventing intracellular drug accumulation • Alteration of porin channels à reduced drug entry • Production of active efflux pumps à reduced drug retention Acquired Mechanisms of Resistance 3. Modification of target by altering: • Binding proteins • Ribosomes • Chromosomes • Cell physiology Acquired Mechanisms of Resistance • Vertical gene transfer = transfer of R-conferring gene to progeny • Horizontal gene transfer = sharing of R-conferring DNA among bacteria • Same or different strains • Transformation = DNA uptake from environment • Transduction = DNA transfer by viruses • Conjugation = plasmid exchange via cell-to-cell contact Antibacterial Agents Antibacterial Agents • Mechanisms of action = disruption of: 1. Cell wall synthesis 2. Cell membrane integrity 3. Protein synthesis 4. Folate metabolism 5. DNA synthesis Bacterial Cell Wall • Main component = peptidoglycan • PS + peptide crosslinks • Formed by transpeptidases (penicillin binding proteins) • Gram positive: • Thick cell wall with greater peptidoglycan content and teichoic acid • Cytoplasmic membrane Bacterial Cell Wall • Main component = peptidoglycan • PS + peptide crosslinks • Formed by transpeptidases (penicillin binding proteins) • Gram negative: • Outer membrane of LPS and phospholipids • Thinner cell wall with lesser peptidoglycan content • Cytoplasmic membrane 1. Cell Wall Synthesis Inhibitors • Penicillins • Cephalosporins • Bacitracin • Glycopeptides Penicillins – Structure and function thiazolidine ring • Side chain: • Spectrum side chain • Susceptibility to destruction • Pharmacokinetic properties • β-lactam: • Function • Bind transpeptidase à inhibit formation of peptide linkages between polysaccharides à inhibit formation of peptidoglycan β-lactam Penicillins – Resistance 1. β-lactamase production • à hydrolysis of β-lactam ring • Occurs extracellularly in G+ • Occurs between cell membrane and wall in G- • Induced by drug binding to bacterial cell wall or • Constitutively produced by bacteria www.wiley.com Penicillins – Resistance 2. Alter transpeptidases • Penicillins unable to bind to and inactivate transpeptidase • ‘MRSA’ www.wiley.com Penicillins – Classes • Effective versus G+ • Resistant to penicillinase • Extended spectrum • Anti-pseudomonal Penicillins Effective versus G+ Penicillin G (parenteral) Penicillin V 1. Highly susceptible to β-lactamases à poor activity versus Staph aureus and Staph epidermidis 2. Ineffective versus altered transpeptidases à poor activity versus Streptococcus pneumoniae, viridans streptococci Penicillins Resistant to penicillinases Methicillin Oxacillin Cloxacillin Dicloxacillin Nafcillin 1. Structural modifications à increased efficacy versus β- lactamase-producing Staph aureus, Staph epidermidis 2. Resistance now due to altered transpeptidases Penicillins Extended spectrum Ampicillin (+/- sulbactam) Amoxicillin (+/- clavulanate) 1. Penicillins inactivated by β-lactamases when not in combo 2. Irreversible inactivation of β-lactamases by sulbactam and clavulanate 3. Ineffective versus altered transpeptidases Penicillins Anti-pseudomonal activity Carbenicillin Ticarcillin (+/- clavulanate) Piperacillin (+/- tazobactam) Mezlocillin Also effective versus Proteus and Enterobacter Cephalosporins – Structure and Function dihydrothiazine ring • Side chains: side chain • Spectrum/classification • Susceptibility to destruction • Pharmacokinetic properties • β-lactam: • Function • Bind transpeptidase à inhibit formation of peptide linkages between polysaccharides à inhibition of peptidoglycan formation β-lactam side chain Cephalosporins – Resistance 1. Destruction by β-lactamases • Cephalosporins less susceptible than penicillins • S. aureus produces penicillinases • G- bacteria produce β-lactamases • Extended spectrum β-lactamases (E. coli, Pseudomonas, etc.) * Zapun A, et al., FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008 Cephalosporins – Resistance 2. Alteration of transpeptidases • Cephalosporins unable to bind to and inactivate enzyme • Less common for cephalosporins than for penicillins • ‘MRSA’ * Zapun A, et al., FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008 Cephalosporins First generation Second Third generation Fourth generation generation Drugs Cephalexin Cefuroxime Ceftazidime Cefepime Cefazolin Cefoxitin Cefotaxime Cefadroxil Cefaclor Ceftriaxone Cephradine Cefprozil Cefixime Cefotetan Cefdinir Other Good G+ activity Good G+ activity Modest G+ Good G+ activity activity Modest G- activity Improved G- Good G- activity activity Improved enteric Increasing G- activity resistance of Streptococcus Ceftazidime has pneumoniae to excellent activity cefazolin versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa Penicillins and Cephalosporins in Ophtho • No commercially available topical ophthalmic preparations • Systemic administration: • Orbital disease • Adnexal disease • Limited use in ocular surface disease • Staph and Strep resistance (penicillins) • Strep resistance (cephalosporins) • Limited use in endophthalmitis Bacitracin • Interrupts transporter molecule à inhibits movement of peptidoglycan precursor from cytoplasm to cell wall • G+ • Staphylococcus • Streptococcus pyogenes • Administered topically (ointment) • Nephrotoxicity • May be administered IM in very few approved situations • Poor transcorneal penetration • “Allergen of the Year” 2003 www.ccbcmd.edu Glycopeptides • Bind D-Ala-D-Ala terminal portion of peptidoglycan precursor à peptidoglycan precursor unavailable for cell wall formation à decreased cell wall growth + decreased cell wall rigidity vancomycin Glycopeptides • Strong activity vs G+ • Drug of choice for MRSA, penicillin- resistant Strep pneumoniae • Most G- are resistant • Vancomycin • Teicoplanin vancomycin Glycopeptides – Resistance 1. Alterations of the antibiotic target • VanA resistance: • Reduced affinity via alteration of terminal amino acid residues of peptidoglycan precursor (D-Ala-D-Ala à D-Ala-D-Lac) • VanC resistance: • Steric hindrance caused by substitution (D-Ala-D-Ala à D-Ala-D- Ser) Glycopeptides – Resistance 2. Altered antibiotic penetration • Inability to penetrate bacterial membrane (G- organisms) • Intrinsic resistance Glycopeptides – Resistance Glycopeptides – Resistance Enterococcal spp that are resistant to vancomycin but require vancomycin presence to grow have been isolated… Vancomycin presence induces resistance mechanisms…. This is VERY BAD… Vancomycin – Ocular Application • Reaches therapeutic AH levels when applied topically (50 mg/ml) • Effective versus corneal infections with MRSA and MRSE • Associated with cystoid macular edema when used intracamerally during cataract surgery • Non-toxic to the retina at 1 mg dose • Intravitreal injection in combination with amikacin or ceftazadime for endophthalmitis * Alster Y, et al., BJO 2000 ** Sotozono C, et al., Cornea 2002 *** Penha FM, et al., Ophthalmic Res 2010 Teicoplanin – Ocular Application • Alternative therapy for MRSA infections • No vitreal penetration when administered topically • Poor vitreal penetration when administered IV 2. Cell Membrane Disruptors • Polymyxin B • Gramicidin • Similarities between bacterial and human cell membranes limit use Polymyxin B • Detergent/surfactant • Disrupts cell membrane phospholipids à increased permeability à cell death • Positively charged drug binds negatively charged LPS layer • Binds
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Trisindolyl-Cycloalkanes and Bis- Indolyl Naphthalene Small Molecules As Potent Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents
    Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Trisindolyl-Cycloalkanes and Bis- Indolyl Naphthalene Small Molecules as Potent Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Vorgelegt der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Institut für Pharmazie Fachbereich für Pharmazeutische Chemie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg von Kaveh Yasrebi Geboren am 09.14.1987 in Teheran/Iran (Islamische Republik) Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Andreas Hilgeroth (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany) 2. Prof. Dr. Sibel Süzen (Ankara Üniversitesi, Turkey) 3. Prof. Dr. Michael Lalk (Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Germany) Halle (Saale), den 21. Juli 2020 Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hiermit erkläre ich gemäß § 5 (2) b der Promotionsordnung der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I – Institut für Pharmazie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel und Quellen angefertigt habe. Alle Stellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus Veröffentlichungen entnommen sind, habe ich als solche kenntlich gemacht. Ich erkläre ferner, dass diese Arbeit in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form bisher keiner anderen Prüfbehörde zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades vorgelegt wurde. Halle (Saale), den 21. Juli 2020 Kaveh Yasrebi Acknowledgement This study was carried out from June 2015 to July 2017 in the Research Group of Drug Development and Analysis led by Prof. Dr. Andreas Hilgeroth at the Institute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. I would like to thank all the people for their participation who supported my work in this way and helped me obtain good results. First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Dr. Andreas Hilgeroth for providing me with opportunity to carry out my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A TWO-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS of ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS with 5PSQ-031 FLUOROQUINOLONE and QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS 24Th Congress Of
    A TWO-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS WITH 5PSQ-031 FLUOROQUINOLONE AND QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS 24th Congress of V. Borsi1, M. Del Lungo2, L. Giovannetti1, M.G. Lai1, M. Parrilli1 1 Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Pharmacovigilance Centre, Florence, Italy 2 Dept. of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), 27-29 March 2019 Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology , University of Florence, Italy BACKGROUND PURPOSE On 9 February 2017, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) initiated a review1 of disabling To review the adverse drugs and potentially long-lasting side effects reported with systemic and inhaled quinolone and fluoroquinolone reactions (ADRs) of antibiotics at the request of the German medicines authority (BfArM) following reports of long-lasting side effects systemic and inhaled in the national safety database and the published literature. fluoroquinolone and quinolone antibiotics that MATERIAL AND METHODS involved peripheral and central nervous system, Retrospective analysis of ADRs reported in our APVD involving ciprofloxacin, flumequine, levofloxacin, tendons, muscles and joints lomefloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, prulifloxacin, rufloxacin, cinoxacin, nalidixic acid, reported from our pipemidic given systemically (by mouth or injection). The period considered is September 2016 to September Pharmacovigilance 2018. Department (PVD). RESULTS 22 ADRs were reported in our PVD involving fluoroquinolone and quinolone antibiotics in the period considered and that affected peripheral or central nervous system, tendons, muscles and joints. The mean patient age was 67,3 years (range: 17-92 years). 63,7% of the ADRs reported were serious, of which 22,7% caused hospitalization and 4,5% caused persistent/severe disability. 81,8% of the ADRs were reported by a healthcare professional (physician, pharmacist or other) and 18,2% by patient or a non-healthcare professional.
    [Show full text]
  • Photodegradation Assessment of Ciprofloxacin, Moxifloxacin
    Hubicka et al. Chemistry Central Journal 2013, 7:133 http://journal.chemistrycentral.com/content/7/1/133 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Photodegradation assessment of ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin in the presence of excipients from tablets by UPLC-MS/MS and DSC Urszula Hubicka1*, PawełŻmudzki2, Przemysław Talik1, Barbara Żuromska-Witek1 and Jan Krzek1 Abstract Background: Ciprofloxacin (CIP), moxifloxacin (MOX), norfloxacin (NOR) and ofloxacin (OFL), are the antibacterial synthetic drugs, belonging to the fluoroquinolones group. Fluoroquinolones are compounds susceptible to photodegradation process, which may lead to reduction of their antibacterial activity and to induce phototoxicity as a side effect. This paper describes a simple, sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of CIP, MOX, NOR and OFL in the presence of photodegradation products. Results: Chromatographic separations were carried out using the Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column; (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size). The column was maintained at 40°C, and the following gradient was used: 0 min, 95% of eluent A and 5% of eluent B; 10 min, 0% of eluent A and 100% of eluent B, at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min-1. Eluent A: 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water; eluent B: 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. The method was validated and all the validation parameters were in the ranges acceptable by the guidelines for analytical method validation. The photodegradation of examined fluoroquinolones in solid phase in the presence of excipients followed kinetic of the first order reaction and depended upon the type of analyzed drugs and coexisting substances.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluoroquinolones in Children: a Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research
    Academic Year 2015 - 2016 Fluoroquinolones in children: a review of current literature and directions for future research Laurens GOEMÉ Promotor: Prof. Dr. Johan Vande Walle Co-promotor: Dr. Kevin Meesters, Dr. Pauline De Bruyne Dissertation presented in the 2nd Master year in the programme of Master of Medicine in Medicine 1 Deze pagina is niet beschikbaar omdat ze persoonsgegevens bevat. Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent, 2021. This page is not available because it contains personal information. Ghent Universit , Librar , 2021. Table of contents Title page Permission for loan Introduction Page 4-6 Methodology Page 6-7 Results Page 7-20 1. Evaluation of found articles Page 7-12 2. Fluoroquinolone characteristics in children Page 12-20 Discussion Page 20-23 Conclusion Page 23-24 Future perspectives Page 24-25 References Page 26-27 3 1. Introduction Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are a class of antibiotics, derived from modification of quinolones, that are highly active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In 1964,naladixic acid was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as first quinolone (1). Chemical modifications of naladixic acid resulted in the first generation of FQ. The antimicrobial spectrum of FQ is broader when compared to quinolones and the tissue penetration of FQ is significantly deeper (1). The main FQ agents are summed up in table 1. FQ owe its antimicrobial effect to inhibition of the enzymes bacterial gyrase and topoisomerase IV which have essential and distinct roles in DNA replication. The antimicrobial spectrum of FQ include Enterobacteriacae, Haemophilus spp., Moraxella catarrhalis, Neiserria spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1). And FQ usually have a weak activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Bugs Don't Mutate: Susceptibility Issues in the Emergence of Bacterial Resistance
    PERSPECTIVES Dead Bugs Don’t Mutate: Susceptibility Issues in the Emergence of Bacterial Resistance Charles W. Stratton*1 The global emergence of antibacterial resistance among and macrolides (the antibacterial agents used most frequently common and atypical respiratory pathogens in the last decade for pneumococcal infections) have become prevalent through- necessitates the strategic application of antibacterial agents. out the world. Indeed, rates of S. pneumoniae resistance to The use of bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic agents as penicillin now exceed 40% in many regions, and a high pro- first-line therapy is recommended because the eradication of portion of these strains are also resistant to macrolides. More- microorganisms serves to curtail, although not avoid, the devel- over, the trend is growing rapidly. Whereas 10.4% of all S. opment of bacterial resistance. Bactericidal activity is achieved with specific classes of antimicrobial agents as well as by com- pneumoniae isolates were resistant to penicillin and 16.5% bination therapy. Newer classes of antibacterial agents, such resistant to macrolides in 1996, these proportions rose to as the fluoroquinolones and certain members of the macrolide/ 14.1% and 21.9%, respectively, in 1997 (9). A more recent lincosamine/streptogramin class have increased bactericidal susceptibility study conducted in 2000–2001 showed that activity compared with traditional agents. More recently, the 51.5% of all S. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to penicillin ketolides (novel, semisynthetic, erythromycin-A derivatives) and 30.0% to macrolides (10). have demonstrated potent bactericidal activity against key res- The urgent need to curtail proliferation of antibacterial- piratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hae- resistant bacteria has refocused attention on the proper use of mophilus influenzae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Moraxella antibacterial agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics: Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, Ofloxacin
    21 March 2019 DDL_fluoroquinolones_March-2019 Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin New restrictions and precautions due to very rare reports of disabling and potentially long-lasting or irreversible side effects • Disabling, long-lasting or potentially irreversible adverse reactions affecting musculoskeletal (including tendonitis and tendon rupture) and nervous systems have been reported with fluoroquinolone antibiotics – see Drug Safety Update for more information • Prescribers and dispensers of fluoroquinolones should advise patients to stop treatment at the first signs of a serious adverse reaction, such as tendinitis or tendon rupture, muscle pain, muscle weakness, joint pain, joint swelling, peripheral neuropathy, and central nervous system effects, and to contact their doctor immediately for further advice – see MHRA sheet to discuss measures with patients • Fluoroquinolone treatment should be discontinued at the first sign of tendon pain or inflammation in patients and the affected limb or limbs appropriately treated (for example with immobilisation) Fluoroquinolones should not be prescribed for: • non-severe or self-limiting infections, or non-bacterial conditions • mild to moderate infections (such as in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) unless other antibiotics that are commonly recommended for these infections are considered inappropriate* • uncomplicated cystitis (for which ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin were previously authorised)
    [Show full text]
  • (-Oxacins): What You Need to Know About Side Effects of Tendons, Muscles, Joints, and Nerves March 2019
    Fluoroquinolone antibiotics (-oxacins): what you need to know about side effects of tendons, muscles, joints, and nerves March 2019 • Fluoroquinolone medicines (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ofloxacin) are effective antibiotics that treat serious and life-threatening infections in the body • Always take your doctor’s advice on when and how to take antibiotics • Fluoroquinolones have been reported to cause serious side effects involving tendons, muscles, joints, and the nerves – in a small proportion of patients, these side effects caused long-lasting or permanent disability Stop taking your fluoroquinolone antibiotic and contact your doctor immediately if you have the following signs of a side effect: o Tendon pain or swelling, often beginning in the ankle or calf - if this happens, rest the painful area until you can see your doctor o Pain in your joints or swelling in your shoulder, arms, or legs o Abnormal pain or sensations (such as persistent pins and needles, tingling, tickling, numbness, or burning), weakness in your body, especially in the legs or arms, or difficulty walking o Severe tiredness, depressed mood, anxiety, or problems with your memory or severe problems sleeping o Changes in your vision, taste, smell, or hearing • Tell your doctor if you have had one of the above effects during or shortly after taking a fluoroquinolone – this means you should avoid them in the future • Doctors will take special care with these medicines if you are older than 60 years of age, if your kidneys do not work well, or if
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Moxifloxacin, Clarithromycin, Minocycline, and Clofazimine In
    ISSN: 2643-461X Neto et al. Int J Trop Dis 2020, 3:035 DOI: 10.23937/2643-461X/1710035 Volume 3 | Issue 2 International Journal of Open Access Tropical Diseases CASE SERIES Daily Moxifloxacin, Clarithromycin, Minocycline, and Clofazimine in Nonresponsiveness Leprosy Cases to Recommended Treatment Regimen Francisco Bezerra de Almeida Neto, MD1,2,3*, Rebeca Daniele Buarque Feitosa, OT3 and Marqueline Soares da Silva, RN3 1Department of Dermatology, Mauricio de Nassau Recife University Center, Brazil Check for 2Department of Tropical Medicine, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Brazil updates 3Cabo de Santo Agostinho Health Care Hansen's Disease Specialized Center, Cabo de Santo Agostinho, Brazil *Corresponding author: Francisco Bezerra de Almeida Neto, MD, Department of Dermatology, Mauricio de Nassau Recife University Center; Department of Tropical Medicine, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE); Cabo de Santo Agostinho Health Care Hansen's Disease Specialized Center, Cabo de Santo Agostinho, R Jonathas de Vasconcelos, 316, Boa Viagem, Recife, PE, CEP 51021140, Brazil, Tel: +5581988484442 Abstract Introduction Background: In hyperendemic countries for leprosy, there Although leprosy is the first infectious disease at- has been a growing increase in clinical multibacillary “non- tributed to a pathogen by Gerard Amauer Hansen, it responsiveness” leprosy cases to the fixed-duration treat- remains a relevant public health problem in countries ment recommended by World Health Organization (MDT- MB). There are no defined protocols to treat these patients. considered hyper-endemic for the disease [1]. Methods: A retrospective, observational case series study The main etiologic agents areMycobacterium leprae was conducted of 4 patients with multibacillary leprosy who and Mycobacterium lepromatosis. The clinical mani- presented to a specialized Leprosy health care.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Efficacy and Corneal Penetration of Besifloxacin in Routine Cataract Surgery Cases
    A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND CORNEAL PENETRATION OF BESIFLOXACIN IN ROUTINE CATARACT SURGERY CASES Thesis submitted to THE TAMILNADU Dr.M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Chennai - 600 032. In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the award of the degree of MASTER OF PHARMACY in PHARMACY PRACTICE Submitted by Reg. No.: 261640151 DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACY PRACTICE PERIYAR COLLEGE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES TIRUCHIRAPPALLI – 620 021. An ISO 9001:2015 Certified Institution SEPTEMBER – 2018 Dr. A. M. ISMAIL, M.Pharm., Ph.D., Professor Emeritus Periyar College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Tiruchirappalli – 620 021. CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND CORNEAL PENETRATION OF BESIFLOXACIN IN ROUTINE CATARACT SURGERY CASES” submitted by B. NIVETHA, B. Pharm., during September 2018 for the award of the degree of “MASTER OF PHARMACY in PHARMACY PRACTICE” under the Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai is a bonafide record of research work done in the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Periyar College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and at Vasan Eye Care Hospital, Tiruchirappalli under my guidance and direct supervision during the academic year 2017-18. Place: Tiruchirappalli – 21. Date: 10th Sep 2018 (Dr. A. M. ISMAIL) Dr. R. SENTHAMARAI, M.Pharm., Ph.D., Principal Periyar College of Pharmaceutical sciences Tiruchirappalli – 620 021. CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND CORNEAL PENETRATION OF BESIFLOXACIN IN ROUTINE CATARACT SURGERY CASES” submitted by B. NIVETHA, B. Pharm., during September 2018 for the award of the degree of “MASTER OF PHARMACY in PHARMACY PRACTICE” under the Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Allergy to Quinolones: Low Cross-Reactivity to Levofloxacin
    T Lobera, et al ORIGINAL ARTICLE Allergy to Quinolones: Low Cross-reactivity to Levofl oxacin T Lobera,1 MT Audícana,2 E Alarcón,1 N Longo,2 B Navarro,1 D Muñoz2 1Department of Allergy, Hospital San Pedro/San Millán, Logroño, Spain 2Department of Allergy, Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Vitoria, Spain ■ Abstract Background: Immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones are rare. Some reports describe the presence of cross-reactivity among different members of the group, although no predictive pattern has been established. No previous studies confi rm or rule out cross-reactivity between levofl oxacin and other quinolones. Therefore, a joint study was designed between 2 allergy departments to assess cross-reactivity between levofl oxacin and other quinolones. Material and Methods: We studied 12 patients who had experienced an immediate-type reaction (4 anaphylaxis and 8 urticaria/angioedema) after oral administration of quinolones. The culprit drugs were as follows: ciprofl oxacin (5), levofl oxacin (4), levofl oxacin plus moxifl oxacin (1), moxifl oxacin (1), and norfl oxacin (1). Allergy was confi rmed by skin tests and controlled oral challenge tests with different quinolones. The basophil activation test (BAT) was applied in 6 patients. Results: The skin tests were positive in 5 patients with levofl oxacin (2), moxifl oxacin (2), and ofl oxacin (2). BAT was negative in all patients (6/6). Most of the ciprofl oxacin-reactive patients (4/5) tolerated levofl oxacin. Similarly, 3 of 4 levofl oxacin-reactive patients tolerated ciprofl oxacin. Patients who reacted to moxifl oxacin and norfl oxacin tolerated ciprofl oxacin and levofl oxacin. Conclusions: Our results suggest that skin testing and BAT do not help to identify the culprit drug or predict cross-reactivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Moxifloxacin Exposure in Patients with Tuberculosis and Diabetes
    AGORA | RESEARCH LETTER Reduced moxifloxacin exposure in patients with tuberculosis and diabetes To the Editor: Prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with tuberculosis (TB) is increasing and may negatively impact TB outcomes in patients with active disease [1]. Gastrointestinal problems, including gastroparesis, may result in delayed drug absorption or malabsorption in patients with DM, which may cause suboptimal drug exposure and poor outcome [2]. Studies on the pharmacokinetics of the first-line anti-TB drugs in patients with DM yielded conflicting results on low drug exposure [3–7]. Moxifloxacin is a potent bactericidal drug against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is key for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR)-TB [8]. Moreover, moxifloxacin can be recommended for TB treatment in patients with monoresistance or intolerance to first-line drugs [9]. Recently, we reported on a patient with TB and DM in whom moxifloxacin exposure was reduced [10]. In this study, we aimed to evaluate moxifloxacin drug exposure in patients with TB and DM. We retrospectively identified all patients aged ⩾16 years who underwent routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) using at least three time-points for moxifloxacin as part of their TB treatment at our centre in the period 2006–2018. For this study, the Medical Ethical Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (Groningen, the Netherlands) waived the need for written informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study (reference 2013/492). Patient data were processed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Controls were TB patients without DM matched for age, sex and rifampicin use (cases/controls 1/1).
    [Show full text]
  • Gatifloxacin for Treating Enteric Fever Submission to the 18Th Expert
    Gatifloxacin for enteric fever Gatifloxacin for treating enteric fever Submission to the 18th Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines 1 Gatifloxacin for enteric fever Table of contents Gatifloxacin for treating enteric fever....................................................................................... 1 Submission to the 18th Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines . 1 1 Summary statement of the proposal for inclusion........................................................... 4 1.1 Rationale for this submission................................................................................... 4 2 Focal point in WHO submitting the application ............................................................... 4 3 Organizations consulted and supporting the application ................................................ 5 4 International Nonproprietary Name (INN, generic name) of the medicine..................... 5 5 Formulation proposed for inclusion ................................................................................. 5 5.1 Prospective formulation improvements.................................................................. 6 6 International availability................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Patent status ............................................................................................................ 6 6.2 Production...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]