Arxiv:2107.12380V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 26 Jul 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UTTG-04-2021 Observational constraints on dark matter scattering with electrons David Nguyen,1 Dimple Sarnaaik,1 Kimberly K. Boddy,2 Ethan O. Nadler,3, 4, 1 and Vera Gluscevic1 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA We present new observational constraints on the elastic scattering of dark matter with electrons for dark matter masses between 10 keV and 1 TeV. We consider scenarios in which the momentum- transfer cross section has a power-law dependence on the relative particle velocity, with a power-law index n 2 {−4; −2; 0; 2; 4; 6g. We search for evidence of dark matter scattering through its sup- pression of structure formation. Measurements of the cosmic microwave background temperature, polarization, and lensing anisotropy from Planck 2018 data and of the Milky Way satellite abundance measurements from the Dark Energy Survey and Pan-STARRS1 show no evidence of interactions. We use these data sets to obtain upper limits on the scattering cross section, comparing them with exclusion bounds from electronic recoil data in direct detection experiments. Our results provide the strongest bounds available for dark matter{electron scattering derived from the distribution of matter in the Universe, extending down to sub-MeV dark matter masses, where current direct detection experiments lose sensitivity. I. INTRODUCTION effective field theory operators [24{26]; in a cosmologi- cal context, these operators produce momentum-transfer Cosmological observations are a powerful tool for cross sections with a power-law dependence on the rela- studying the fundamental particle properties of dark tive velocity between scattering DM particles and nucle- matter (DM). In the standard ΛCDM cosmology, DM is a ons [6], permitting a straightforward comparison between cold, collisionless fluid. However, if non-gravitational in- constraints from cosmology and direct detection. Direct teractions between DM and ordinary matter exist, these detection experiments have achieved extraordinary sen- interactions can have an observable effect on the distri- sitivity to the DM{nucleon cross section, primarily for bution of matter throughout the Universe. DM masses above the GeV scale. Cosmological observ- Elastic scattering between DM and baryons in the ables probe much larger scattering cross sections, mostly early Universe inhibits structure formation (with re- outside the sensitivity range of direct detection experi- spect to ΛCDM), dampening the cosmic microwave back- ments [27, 28], and DM masses & keV. ground (CMB) anisotropies and suppressing the matter Cosmological studies of DM{baryon scattering have power spectrum on small scales [1{3]. Previous stud- mainly focused on DM{proton scattering. Observa- ies have placed upper limits on the momentum-transfer tions can also provide bounds on DM{electron scattering, cross section between DM and protons as a function of which are complementary to direct detection searches DM mass using measurements of CMB anisotropies from using electronic recoils [29{39]. Electronic-recoil experi- the Planck satellite [4{9].1 A variety of other observa- ments have gained significant interest in recent years, be- tional probes of structure|including the Lyman-α for- cause they can probe sub-GeV DM masses. At present, est [13, 14], strong gravitational lensing [15, 16], stellar the only cosmological constraints on DM{electron scat- stream perturbations [17], and Milky Way satellite galax- tering are from CMB spectral distortions [11]. ies [18{21]|constrain the amount of suppression of the In this work, we focus on constraining DM{electron −1 scattering using the latest measurements of the CMB matter power spectrum at scales & 1 h Mpc . Previous work has constrained DM{proton scattering using mea- temperature, polarization, and lensing anisotropies from surements of the Lyman-α forest power spectrum [4,7] the Planck satellite [40] and using the abundance of arXiv:2107.12380v1 [astro-ph.CO] 26 Jul 2021 and, more recently, using the abundance of Milky Way Milky Way satellites from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) satellite galaxies [20, 22, 23]. and Pan-STARRS1 [41]. We present constraints on the These observational limits can be compared directly DM{electron momentum-transfer cross section for DM with the bounds from direct detection experiments masses & 10 keV, while electronic-recoil direct detection searching for nuclear recoils, which cover complemen- searches lose sensitivity below MeV mass scales. Addi- tionally, our limits extend to arbitrarily large cross sec- tary regions of parameter space for broad classes of DM 2 models. Such models can be described using low-energy tions, while direct detection limits are subject to a de- tection ceiling [43{45]. 1 There are also limits on DM scattering [10, 11] derived from the 2 Theoretical considerations place restrictions on the maximum bounds on CMB spectral distortions [12]. DM cross section due to partial wave unitarity for point-like DM 2 In order to maintain the clear connection to direct de- A. Models tection experiments, we assume that DM scatters only with electrons and has no appreciable interaction with The relevant scattering quantity entering the Boltz- other Standard Model particles. Such a scenario may mann equations in Sec. IIB is the momentum-transfer arise in leptophilic models of DM [46{53], in which DM scattering cross section, obtained by weighting the dif- is not coupled to neutrinos [49, 51, 54]. In more gen- ferential cross section by the fractional longitudinal mo- eral frameworks, DM can scatter with various Standard mentum transferred in the scattering process: Model particles. Even in leptophilic models, there may be substantial DM{nucleon scattering induced at the Z dσ σMT dΩ (1 cos θ) ; (1) loop level [55, 56]. Incorporating multiple scattering ≡ dΩ − channels would strengthen cosmological constraints, but the relationship between the cross sections for different where θ is the scattering angle. We parameterize this channels is model-dependent and left for future work. cross section as During the completion of this manuscript, we learned σ σ vn ; of similar work in progress, presented in Ref. [57], which MT = 0 (2) n places constraints on DM{electron scattering for where σ is a constant coefficient and v is the relative 4; 2; 0 using CMB and baryon acoustic oscillation2 0 {− − g velocity between the incoming scattering particles with a (BAO) data, the abundance of Milky Way satellites, and power-law index n. α the Lyman- forest. Where there is overlap, our results This parameterization of the velocity dependence en- are in reasonable agreement, and we have verified that compasses a wide class of DM models. In an effort to the inclusion of BAO data has little effect on our CMB be agnostic towards the underlying UV theory of DM, constraints. We note that Ref. [57] includes an analysis we may consider effective field theories that allow DM of Milky Way satellites for n = 2 and n = 4. Cur- − − and electrons to interact through higher-dimensional op- rent methods [20, 22, 23] are not suitable for obtaining erators [55, 58{60]. Since we are concerned with DM conservative limits for these cases, so we consider n 0 ≥ interactions in the nonrelativistic regime, we can adapt only. See Sec. III for further discussion. the nonrelativistic operators formalism for DM{nucleon In Sec. II, we describe how the Boltzmann equations scattering [24{26] to the case of DM{electron scatter- and cosmological observables are modified in the pres- ing [61]; these nonrelativistic operators map onto linear ence of DM{electron scattering. In Sec. III, we describe combinations of the relativistic operators. Reference [6] our procedure for constraining DM{electron scattering showed how these nonrelativistic operators are cast into with Planck data and with Milky Way satellite abun- the form of Eq. (2) for use in a cosmological setting, and dance data, and we present our results. In Sec.IV, we the possible velocity dependencies are n 0; 2; 4; 6 , as- compare our bounds with limits from direct detection suming no additional velocity- or momentum-dependence2 f g experiments, for selected models. We conclude in Sec.V. is introduced through the Wilson coupling coefficients. Negative values of n arise when DM interacts with elec- trons through a very light mediator, with a mass much II. DARK MATTER SCATTERING smaller than the typical amount of momentum trans- ferred via scattering. For example, DM with an elec- Elastic scattering between DM and ordinary matter tric dipole moment scatters with n = 2 [62]. The in the early Universe transfers energy and momentum case of n = 4 is relevant for millicharged− DM, in between the DM and baryon fluids, suppressing the for- which DM possesses− a small electric charge that per- mation of structure at progressively smaller scales. This mits Coulomb interactions (e.g., see Ref. [63{65]). We suppression dampens the small-scale CMB power spec- note that DM interacting with electrons through an elec- tra and may, depending on the scattering model, create tromagnetic channel would also permit interactions with a sharp cutoff in the matter power spectrum (with re- other charged particles, such as protons and helium nu- spect to ΛCDM) at small scales [2]. clei. In this work, we purposefully limit our scope to DM{ When working with the cosmological Boltzmann equa- electron scattering only in order to make fair comparisons tions, electrons are treated as a component of the non- with electronic-recoil direct detection experiments. An relativistic baryon fluid due to their tight coupling to analysis of any particular model with multiple scatter- baryonic particles. The treatment of DM scattering with ing channels would strengthen the results we present in electrons rather than protons or helium is a matter of Sec.