DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1705.02358V2 [Hep-Ph] 24 Nov 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1705.02358V2 [Hep-Ph] 24 Nov 2017 Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure Sean Tulin1, ∗ and Hai-Bo Yu2, y 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA (Dated: November 28, 2017) Abstract We review theories of dark matter (DM) beyond the collisionless paradigm, known as self-interacting dark matter (SIDM), and their observable implications for astrophysical structure in the Universe. Self- interactions are motivated, in part, due to the potential to explain long-standing (and more recent) small scale structure observations that are in tension with collisionless cold DM (CDM) predictions. Simple particle physics models for SIDM can provide a universal explanation for these observations across a wide range of mass scales spanning dwarf galaxies, low and high surface brightness spiral galaxies, and clusters of galaxies. At the same time, SIDM leaves intact the success of ΛCDM cosmology on large scales. This report covers the following topics: (1) small scale structure issues, including the core-cusp problem, the diversity problem for rotation curves, the missing satellites problem, and the too-big-to-fail problem, as well as recent progress in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation; (2) N-body simulations for SIDM, including implications for density profiles, halo shapes, substructure, and the interplay between baryons and self- interactions; (3) semi-analytic Jeans-based methods that provide a complementary approach for connecting particle models with observations; (4) merging systems, such as cluster mergers (e.g., the Bullet Cluster) and minor infalls, along with recent simulation results for mergers; (5) particle physics models, including light mediator models and composite DM models; and (6) complementary probes for SIDM, including indirect and direct detection experiments, particle collider searches, and cosmological observations. We provide a summary and critical look for all current constraints on DM self-interactions and an outline for future directions. arXiv:1705.02358v2 [hep-ph] 24 Nov 2017 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] yElectronic address: [email protected] 1 Contents I. Introduction 4 A. The dark matter puzzle 4 B. Crisis on small scales 6 C. Self-Interacting dark matter 7 D. From astrophysics to particle theory 10 II. Astrophysical observations 12 A. Core-Cusp Problem 12 B. Diversity Problem 16 C. Missing Satellites Problem 17 D. Too-Big-to-Fail Problem 19 E. Baryon feedback 21 III. N-body simulations and SIDM halo properties 24 A. Implementing self-interactions in simulations 26 B. Halo density profiles 27 C. Halo shapes: ellipticity 30 D. Substructure 31 E. SIDM simulations with baryons 34 IV. Jeans approach to relaxed SIDM halos 35 A. Isothermal solutions to the Jeans equations 35 B. Diverse rotation curves for SIDM 38 C. Scaling relations 41 V. Halo mergers 42 A. Observations 43 B. Self-interactions in merging clusters 46 C. Self-interactions in minor mergers 48 VI. Particle physics models 49 A. What cross section is relevant? 49 B. Self-coupled scalar 51 C. Light mediator models 51 D. Strongly interacting dark matter 54 E. Dark atoms 56 F. SIDM with an excited state 57 VII. Complementary searches 58 A. Portals for light mediators 59 B. Direct detection 60 C. Indirect detection 63 D. Collider searches 65 E. Cosmological probes 67 VIII. Conclusions 69 2 A. Summary 69 B. Outlook 71 References 74 3 I. INTRODUCTION A. The dark matter puzzle It was long ago pointed out by Oort that the distributions of mass and light in galaxies have little resemblance to one another [1]. At the time, observations of galaxy NGC 3115 found a rota- tion curve rising linearly with radius—indicating a constant mass density—despite its luminosity falling by over an order of magnitude. Oort derived a mass-to-light ratio that increased with dis- tance up to 250 in solar units1 at the outermost radius. He concluded that the luminous disk of NGC 3115 is∼ “imbedded in a more or less homogeneous mass of great density” [1]. The same phe- nomenon was observed in M31 by Babcock a year earlier [2]. These observations stood in contrast to the Milky Way (MW), where, by studying vertical dynamics of nearby stars, the mass-to-light ratio within the disk was known to be only 2 at the solar radius [3, 4, 5, 6]. Earlier pioneering observations of the Coma cluster by Zwicky∼ [7] and Virgo cluster by Smith [8] inferred similarly striking discrepencies between mass and light on much larger scales. These issues were not fully appreciated for several decades, when astronomers were able to study galactic rotational velocities at much larger distances. While many rotation curves exhibited a linearly increasing velocity at small distances, they were expected to turn over eventually and fall as r−1=2 according to Kepler’s laws [9]. Instead, optical observations by Rubin and Ford of M31 [10]—soon after extended to larger radii using 21-cm radio observations [11, 12]—revealed a circular velocity that did not fall off, but remained approximately constant. Many other spiral galaxies were found to exhibit the same behavior [12, 13, 14, 15, 16], indicating that most of the mass in galaxies is found in massive, nonluminous halos extending far beyond the spatial extent of luminous stars and gas [17, 18]. Massive spherical dark halos could also explain the apparent stability of bulgeless spiral galaxies [19], which by themselves are unstable to the formation of bars [20, 21]. The large amount of dark matter (DM) required by observations pointed toward its nonbary- onic nature.2 The total mass density found in halos was estimated to be around 20% of the critical density [17, 18], in remarkable agreement with present cosmological values [22]. If composed of baryons, the cosmological baryon density would be in tension with upper limits inferred from nucleosynthesis arguments [23], as well as being difficult to hide from astrophysical observa- tions [24]. Therefore, the “missing mass” puzzle in galaxies, as well as clusters, suggested the existence of a new dominant form of matter, such as an elementary particle leftover from the Big Bang. At first, the neutrino appeared to be a promising DM candidate within the Standard Model (SM) of elementary particles [25, 26, 27]. A relic thermal bath of neutrinos, produced alongside the cosmic microwave background (CMB), could yield the required mass density if the neutrino mass was (10 eV). However, because neutrinos are “hot” DM—they decouple from photons and electrons aroundO the nucleosynthesis epoch while still relativistic—free-streaming erases density fluctuations below supercluster scales (see, e.g., Ref. [28]). Numerical simulations have shown that top-down structure formation, where superclusters form first in the neutrino-dominated Uni- verse and subsequently fragment to produce galaxies, is incompatible with galaxy clustering con- straints [29, 30, 31]. Cosmological data has converged upon the ΛCDM paradigm as the standard model of cos- 1 Modern distance estimates revise Oort’s value down to 40. ∼ 2 In this context, the term “baryons” represents protons, neutrons, and electrons that constitute normal atomic matter. 4 FIG. 1: Matter power spectrum inferred through cosmological measurements. Red line shows the best fit for ΛCDM cosmology for a simplified five-parameter model, assuming a flat spatial geometry and a scale- invariant primordial spectrum. Reprinted from Ref. [32]. See therein and Ref. [33] for further information. mology (e.g., Ref. [34]). Of the total mass-energy content of the Universe, approximately 26% is cold dark matter (CDM) and 5% is baryonic matter (while the remainder is consistent with a cosmological constant Λ), with a nearly scale-invariant spectrum of primordial fluctuations [22]. In this picture, structure in the Universe forms as primordial overdensities collapse under gravity. Since CDM, acting as a pressureless fluid, is more dominant and collapses more readily than bary- onic matter, it provides the gravitational potential underlying the distribution of visible matter in the Universe. The observed matter power spectrum, as obtained from a variety of cosmological probes, is in remarkable agreement with ΛCDM cosmology, shown in Fig. 1. In addition, the ΛCDM model also explains many important aspects of galaxy formation [35, 36]. Despite this success, all evidence to date for DM comes from its gravitational influence in the Universe. With no viable DM candidate within SM, the underlying theory for DM remains unknown. Many new particle physics theories proposed to address shortcomings of the SM simul- taneously predict new particles that can be a DM candidate. Examples include weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs) motivated by the hierarchy problem, such as neutralinos in the su- persymmetric models [37, 38] and Kaluza-Klein states in extra dimensional models [39, 40], as well as extremely light axion particles [41] associated with the solution to the strong CP prob- lem in QCD [42]. The comic abundance of these new particles can be naturally close to the DM abundance inferred from the cosmological observations (e.g., Ref. [43]). This coincidence has mo- tivated decades of efforts to discover the particle physics realization of DM through experimental searches for new physics beyond the SM (e.g., see [44, 45, 46] and references therein). On large scales, the structure of the Universe is consistent with DM particles that are cold, colli- sionless, and interact with each other and SM particles purely via gravity. WIMPs and axions have interactions with the SM that are potentially large enough to be detectable in the laboratory, while 5 on astrophysical scales these interactions are negligible and these candidates behave as CDM. On the other hand, other particle physics candidates for DM may have interactions with the SM are too feeble to observe directly. Here, observational tests of structure and departures from the CDM paradigm play a complementary role in probing the particle physics of DM independently of its interactions with SM particles (as had been done for hot DM candidates).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOND Prediction of a New Giant Shell in the Elliptical Galaxy NGC 3923
    A&A 566, A151 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423935 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics MOND prediction of a new giant shell in the elliptical galaxy NGC 3923 M. Bílek1,2,K.Bartošková1,3,I.Ebrová1,4, and B. Jungwiert1,2 1 Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Bocníˇ II 1401/1a, 141 00 Prague, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] 2 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Prague, Czech Republic 3 Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlárskᡠ2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic 4 Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Received 2 April 2014 / Accepted 27 April 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stellar shells, which form axially symmetric systems of arcs in some elliptical galaxies, are most likely remnants of radial minor mergers. They are observed up a radius of ∼100 kpc. The stars in them oscillate in radial orbits. The radius of a shell depends on the free-fall time at the position of the shell and on the time since the merger. We previously verified the consistency of shell radii in the elliptical galaxy NGC 3923 with its most probable MOND potential. Our results implied that an as yet undiscovered shell exists at the outskirts of the galaxy. Aims. We here extend our study by assuming more general models for the gravitational potential to verify the prediction of the new shell and to estimate its position.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Cosmic Probes of Ultra-Light Axion Dark Matter
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Cosmic probes of ultra-light axion dark matter Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (TF09) Astro-particle physics and cosmology Contact Information: Name (Institution) [email]: Keir K. Rogers (Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University; Dunlap Institute, University of Toronto) [ [email protected]] Authors: Simeon Bird (UC Riverside), Simon Birrer (Stanford University), Djuna Croon (TRIUMF), Alex Drlica-Wagner (Fermilab, University of Chicago), Jeff A. Dror (UC Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Daniel Grin (Haverford College), David J. E. Marsh (Georg-August University Goettingen), Philip Mocz (Princeton), Ethan Nadler (Stanford), Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (University of New Hamp- shire), Keir K. Rogers (Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University; Dunlap Insti- tute, University of Toronto), Katelin Schutz (MIT), Neelima Sehgal (Stony Brook University), Yu-Dai Tsai (Fermilab), Tien-Tien Yu (University of Oregon), Yimin Zhong (University of Chicago). Abstract: Ultra-light axions are a compelling dark matter candidate, motivated by the string axiverse, the strong CP problem in QCD, and possible tensions in the CDM model. They are hard to probe experimentally, and so cosmological/astrophysical observations are very sensitive to the distinctive gravitational phenomena of ULA dark matter. There is the prospect of probing fifteen orders of magnitude in mass, often down to sub-percent contributions to the DM in the next ten to twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Du Ciel Profond
    Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 .
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Structure Is It a Valid Motivation?
    Small-scale Structure Is it a valid motivation? Jakub Scholtz IPPP (Durham) Small Scale Structure Problems <—> All the reasons why “CDM is not it” How did we get here? We are gravitationally sensitive to something sourcing T • <latexit sha1_base64="055AcnSYYRkGsBe2aYAe7vH1peg=">AAAB8XicbVDLSgNBEOz1GeMr6tHLYBA8hV0R9Bj04jFCXphdwuxkNhkyM7vMQwhL/sKLB0W8+jfe/BsnyR40saChqOqmuyvOONPG97+9tfWNza3t0k55d2//4LBydNzWqVWEtkjKU9WNsaacSdoyzHDazRTFIua0E4/vZn7niSrNUtk0k4xGAg8lSxjBxkmPzX4eChtKO+1Xqn7NnwOtkqAgVSjQ6Fe+wkFKrKDSEI617gV+ZqIcK8MIp9NyaDXNMBnjIe05KrGgOsrnF0/RuVMGKEmVK2nQXP09kWOh9UTErlNgM9LL3kz8z+tZk9xEOZOZNVSSxaLEcmRSNHsfDZiixPCJI5go5m5FZIQVJsaFVHYhBMsvr5L2ZS3wa8HDVbV+W8RRglM4gwsI4BrqcA8NaAEBCc/wCm+e9l68d+9j0brmFTMn8Afe5w/beZEG</latexit> µ⌫ —> we are fairly certain that DM exists. • An exception is MOND, which has issues of its own. However, the MOND community has been instrumental in pointing out some of the discrepancies with CDM. • But how do we verify the picture? —> NBODY simulations (disclaimer: I have never run a serious body simulation) 2WalterDehnen,JustinI.Read:N-body SimulationsN-body simulations of gravitational dynamics have reached over 106 particles [6], while collisionless calculations can now reach more than 109 particles [7–10]. This disparity reflects the difference in complexity of these rather dissimilar N-body problems. The significant increase in N in the last decade was driven by the usage of parallel computers. In this review, we discuss the state-of-the art software algo- Takerithms N and dark hardware matter improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1306.3244V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 4 Feb 2014
    The Scientific Reach of Multi-Ton Scale Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiments Jayden L. Newsteada, Thomas D. Jacquesa, Lawrence M. Kraussa;b, James B. Dentc, and Francesc Ferrerd a Department of Physics and School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA, b Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mt. Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University, Canberra 2614, Australia, c Department of Physics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA, and d Physics Department and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA (Dated: November 6, 2018) Abstract The next generation of large scale WIMP direct detection experiments have the potential to go beyond the discovery phase and reveal detailed information about both the particle physics and astrophysics of dark matter. We report here on early results arising from the development of a detailed numerical code modeling the proposed DARWIN detector, involving both liquid argon and xenon targets. We incorporate realistic detector physics, particle physics and astrophysical uncertainties and demonstrate to what extent two targets with similar sensitivities can remove various degeneracies and allow a determination of dark matter cross sections and masses while also probing rough aspects of the dark matter phase space distribution. We find that, even assuming arXiv:1306.3244v2 [astro-ph.CO] 4 Feb 2014 dominance of spin-independent scattering, multi-ton scale experiments still have degeneracies that depend sensitively on the dark matter mass, and on the possibility of isospin violation and inelas- ticity in interactions. We find that these experiments are best able to discriminate dark matter properties for dark matter masses less than around 200 GeV.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2107.12380V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 26 Jul 2021
    UTTG-04-2021 Observational constraints on dark matter scattering with electrons David Nguyen,1 Dimple Sarnaaik,1 Kimberly K. Boddy,2 Ethan O. Nadler,3, 4, 1 and Vera Gluscevic1 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA We present new observational constraints on the elastic scattering of dark matter with electrons for dark matter masses between 10 keV and 1 TeV. We consider scenarios in which the momentum- transfer cross section has a power-law dependence on the relative particle velocity, with a power-law index n 2 {−4; −2; 0; 2; 4; 6g. We search for evidence of dark matter scattering through its sup- pression of structure formation. Measurements of the cosmic microwave background temperature, polarization, and lensing anisotropy from Planck 2018 data and of the Milky Way satellite abundance measurements from the Dark Energy Survey and Pan-STARRS1 show no evidence of interactions. We use these data sets to obtain upper limits on the scattering cross section, comparing them with exclusion bounds from electronic recoil data in direct detection experiments. Our results provide the strongest bounds available for dark matter{electron scattering derived from the distribution of matter in the Universe, extending down to sub-MeV dark matter masses, where current direct detection experiments lose sensitivity. I. INTRODUCTION effective field theory operators [24{26]; in a cosmologi- cal context, these operators produce momentum-transfer Cosmological observations are a powerful tool for cross sections with a power-law dependence on the rela- studying the fundamental particle properties of dark tive velocity between scattering DM particles and nucle- matter (DM).
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundary of Galaxy Clusters and Its Implications on SFR Quenching
    The splashback boundary of galaxy clusters in mass and light and its implications for galaxy evolution T.-H. Shin, Ph.D. candidate at UPenn Collaborators: S. Adhikari, E. J. Baxter, C. Chang, B. Jain, N. Battaglia et al. (DES collaboration) (SPT collaboration) (ACT collaboration) https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06081 (accepted to MNRAS); 2019 paper in preparation Based on ~400 public cluster sample from ACT+SPT Ongoing analysis of 1000+ SZ-selected clusters from DES+ACT+SPT Background Mass and boundary of dark matter halos However, MΔ and RΔ are subject to pseudo-evolution due to the decrease in the ρ ρ reference density ( c or m) Haloes continuously accrete matter; there is no radius within which the matter is fully virialized ⇒ where is the physical boundary of the halos? Credit: Andrey Kravtsov Cosmology with galaxy clusters Galaxy clusters live in the high-mass tail of the halo mass function ⇒ very sensitive to the growth of the structure Ω σ ( m and 8) Thus, it is important to accurately define/measure Tinker et al. (2008) the mass of the cluster Preliminary work by Diemer et al. illuminates that the mass function becomes more universal against redshift when we use so-called “splashback radius” as the physical boundary of the dark matter halos Background ● Galaxies fall into the cluster potential, escaping from the Hubble flow ● They form a sharp “physical” boundary around their first apocenters after the infall, which we call “splashback radius” Background ● A simple spherical collapse model can predict the existence of the splashback feature (Gunn & Gott 1972, Fillmore & Goldreich 1984, Bertschinger 1985, Adhikari et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter 18Th May 2021.Pdf
    Searches for Dark Matter Seminar presentation 18th May 2021 Iida Kostamo 1/20 Contents • Background and history - How did we end up with the dark matter hypothesis? • Hot and cold dark matter - Candidates for cold dark matter • The halo density profile • Simulations (Millennium and Bolshoi) • Summary Seminar presentation 18th May 2021 Iida Kostamo 2/20 Background • The total mass-energy density of the universe (approximately): 1. 5% ordinary baryonic matter 2. 25% dark matter 3. 70% dark energy • Originally dark matter was referred to as "the missing mass" - 1930's: Fritz Zwicky did research on galaxy clusters • ...The problem is the missing light, not the missing mass, hence "dark matter" Seminar presentation 18th May 2021 Iida Kostamo 3/20 The rotation curves of galaxies • The rotation curve describes how the rotation velocity of an object depends on the distance from the center of the galaxy • Assumption: Kepler's III law, i.e. the rotation velocities decrease with increasing distance • In the 1970's Vera Rubin and her colleagues did research on the rotation curves of various spiral galaxies Seminar presentation 18th May 2021 Iida Kostamo 4/20 The rotation curves of galaxies • H = Hubble constant • The rotation curves become flat when the radius is large enough • The same result for all galaxies: the rotation curves are not descending → There must be non-luminous mass in galaxies Seminar presentation 18th May 2021 Iida Kostamo 5/20 MACHOs (Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Object) • Objects that emit extremely little or no light →
    [Show full text]
  • Probing the Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe
    PROBING THE NATURE OF DARK MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE A Thesis Submitted For The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy In The Faculty Of Science by Abir Sarkar Under the supervision of Prof. Shiv K Sethi Raman Research Institute Joint Astronomy Programme (JAP) Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science BANGALORE - 560012 JULY, 2017 c Abir Sarkar JULY 2017 All rights reserved Declaration I, Abir Sarkar, hereby declare that the work presented in this doctoral thesis titled `Probing The Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe', is entirely original. This work has been carried out by me under the supervision of Prof. Shiv K Sethi at the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Raman Research Institute under the Joint Astronomy Programme (JAP) of the Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science. I further declare that this has not formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma, membership, associateship or similar title of any university or institution. Department of Physics Abir Sarkar Indian Institute of Science Date : Bangalore, 560012 INDIA TO My family, without whose support this work could not be done Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Shiv K Sethi in Raman Research Institute(RRI). He has always spent substantial time whenever I have needed for any academic discussions. I am thankful for his inspirations and ideas to make my Ph.D. experience produc- tive and stimulating. I am also grateful to our collaborator Prof. Subinoy Das of Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India. I am thankful to him for his insightful comments not only for our publica- tions but also for the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophysical Uncertainties of Direct Dark Matter Searches
    Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Astrophysical uncertainties of direct dark matter searches Dissertation by Andreas G¨unter Rappelt Physik Department, T30d & Collaborative Research Center SFB 1258 “Neutrinos and Dark Matter in Astro- and Particlephysics” Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Physik Department T30d Astrophysical uncertainties of direct dark matter searches Andreas G¨unter Rappelt Vollst¨andigerAbdruck der von der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Technischen Universit¨at M¨unchen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Lothar Oberauer Pr¨uferder Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr. Alejandro Ibarra 2. Prof. Dr. Bj¨ornGarbrecht Die Dissertation wurde am 12.11.2019 bei der Technischen Universit¨at M¨unchen eingereicht und durch die Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik am 24.01.2020 angenommen. Abstract Although the first hints towards dark matter were discovered almost 100 years ago, little is known today about its properties. Also, dark matter has so far only been inferred through astronomical and cosmological observations. In this work, we therefore investi- gate the influence of astrophysical assumptions on the interpretation of direct searches for dark matter. For this, we assume that dark matter is a weakly interacting massive particle. First, we discuss the development of a new analysis method for direct dark matter searches. Starting from the decomposition of the dark matter velocity distribu- tion into streams, we present a method that is completely independent of astrophysical assumptions. We extend this by using an effective theory for the interaction of dark matter with nucleons. This allows to analyze experiments with minimal assumptions on the particle physics of dark matter. Finally, we improve our method so that arbitrarily strong deviations from a reference velocity distribution can be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling Mass Profiles Around Elliptical Galaxies Observed with Chandra
    Scaling Mass Profiles around Elliptical Galaxies Observed with Chandra and XMM-Newton Y. Fukazawa1, J. G. Betoya-Nonesa1, J. Pu1, A. Ohto1, and N. Kawano1 Department of Physical Science, School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526 [email protected] ABSTRACT We investigated the dynamical structure of 53 elliptical galaxies, based on the Chandra archival X-ray data. In X-ray luminous galaxies, a temperature increases with radius and a gas density is systematically higher at the optical outskirts, indicating a presence of a significant amount of the group-scale hot gas. In contrast, X-ray dim galaxies show a flat or declining temperature profile against radius and the gas density is relatively lower at the optical outskirts. Thus it is found that X-ray bright and faint elliptical galaxies are clearly distinguished by the temperature and gas density profile. The mass profile is well scaled by a virial radius r200 rather than an optical-half radius re, and is quite similar at (0.001 − 0.03)r200 between X-ray luminous and dim galaxies, and smoothly connects to those of clusters of galaxies. At the inner region of (0.001 − 0.01)r200 or (0.1 − 1)re, the mass profile well traces a stellar mass with a constant mass-to- light ratio of M/LB =3 − 10(M⊙/L⊙). M/LB ratio of X-ray bright galaxies rises up steeply beyond 0.01r200, and thus requires a presence of massive dark matter halo. From the deprojection analysis combined with the XMM-Newton data, we arXiv:astro-ph/0509521v1 18 Sep 2005 found that X-ray dim galaxies, NGC 3923, NGC 720, and IC 1459, also have a high M/LB ratio of 20–30 at 20 kpc, comparable to that of X-ray luminous galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Globular Cluster Systems of the Leo II Group and Their Global Relationships
    MNRAS 458, 105–126 (2016) doi:10.1093/mnras/stw185 The SLUGGS survey∗: exploring the globular cluster systems of the Leo II group and their global relationships Sreeja S. Kartha,1‹ Duncan A. Forbes,1 Adebusola B. Alabi,1 Jean P. Brodie,2 Aaron J. Romanowsky,2,3 Jay Strader,4 Lee R. Spitler,5,6 Zachary G. Jennings2 and Joel C. Roediger7 1Centre for Astrophysics & Supercomputing, Swinburne University, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia 2University of California Observatories, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, San Jose´ State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192, USA 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 5Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia 6Australian Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 915, North Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia 7NRC Herzberg Astronomy & Astrophysics, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada Accepted 2016 January 20. Received 2016 January 20; in original form 2015 July 23 ABSTRACT We present an investigation of the globular cluster (GC) systems of NGC 3607 and NGC 3608 as part of the ongoing SLUGGS (SAGES Legacy Unifying Globulars and GalaxieS) survey. We use wide-field imaging data from the Subaru telescope in the g, r and i filters to analyse the radial density, colour and azimuthal distributions of both GC systems. With the complementary kinematic data obtained from the Keck II telescope, we measure the radial velocities of a total of 81 GCs. Our results show that the GC systems of NGC 3607 and NGC 3608 have a detectable spatial extent of ∼15 and 13 galaxy effective radii, respectively.
    [Show full text]