Doj Adjusted Legislative District Plan N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Doj Adjusted Legislative District Plan N

Fredonia Colorado City Page Lake Powell Kayenta DoJ Adjusted Navajo Navajo Legislative District Plan Many Farms Lake Tuba City Chinle Grand Canyon 2 Navajo Lake Mead Havasupai Laguna Lake CCoocc oo nn iinn oo Hopi Hopi M o h a v e Hualapai Polacca M o h a v e CCoouu nn ttyy Hopi CCoouu nn ttyy Ganado Red Lake Hualapai NNaavv aa jjoo CCoouu nn ttyy Saint Michaels Hualapai Lake Mohave AApp aacc hh ee Navajo C o u n t y Williams C o u n t y Legend Kingman Flagstaff Bullhead City 3 1 Lower Lake Mary Cities (by Population) Winslow District Fill Color Fort Mojave Upper Lake Mary <= 50000 Mormon Lake Holbrook 1 19 28 Fort Mojave Sedona 50001 - 75000 Chino Valley Clarkdale 10 2 29 Topock Marsh YYaa vv aapp aa ii Cornville Tremaine Lake 75001 - 150000 C o u n t y Cottonwood 11 20 3 C o u n t y Dry Lake Zion Reservoir Prescott Camp Verde 150001 - 500000 Snowflake Saint Johns 12 21 30 Lake Havasu City Taylor 500001 - 3500000 Lake Havasu 13 22 4 White Lakes Basin Lyman Lake Alamo Lake Show Low Highway 14 23 5 Payson Parker Interstate or Freeway Pinetop Springerville Eagar 15 24 6 Fort Apache Colorado River Nelson Reservoir Rivers and Streams 16 25 7 4 Horseshoe Reservoir Sunrise Lake Fort Apache Lake Pleasant Bartlett Reservoir GGii llaa Big Lake American Indian Areas 17 26 8 5 LLaa PPaa zz 6 7 8 CCoouu nn ttyy Fort Apache 18 27 9 Theodore Roosevelt Lake Ehrenberg CCoouu nn ttyy El Mirage County Boundaries 9 11 Apache Lake San Carlos District Outline 19 Apache Junction Miami Buckeye 12 13 16 17 San Carlos 22 Superior Globe San Carlos G r e e n l e e MMaarr iicc oo ppaa 21 G r e e n l e e 20 Queen Creek C o u n t y C o u n t y San Carlos Reservoir Bylas C o u n t y C o u n t y Morenci 23 Clifton Colorado River Gila Bend Florence 24 Gila River Imperial Reservoir Casa Grande Coolidge San Carlos Pima PPiinn aa ll Safford YYuu mmaa Eloy C o u n t y GGrr aahh aa mmThatcher Yuma Tohono O'odham C o u n t y Mammoth N Wellton CCoouu nn ttyy CCoouu nn ttyy Swift Trail Junction Cocopah Oracle Somerton Tohono O'odham Lake Saint Clair San Manuel San Luis Marana Ajo 26 0 25 50 100 150 200 Miles PPiimm aa 28 Willcox 25 CCoouu nn ttyy 27 Three Points Willcox Playa Tohono O'odham 29 Benson Map Produced For: Sells Saint David CCoocc hh iiss ee Green Valley 30 Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Menagers Lake CCoouu nn ttyy 1400 West Washington Street, Suite B-10 Tombstone Phoenix, Arizona 85007 S a n t a C r u z Sierra Vista (602) 364-1350 or (866) 864-7569 (Toll Free) S a n t a C r u z CCoouu nn ttyy Bisbee www.azredistricting.org Friday, May 24th, 2002 Nogales Douglas.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey
THEODORE ROOSEVELT RESERVOIR 1995 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY 1.FOkTF1Ep02. RESOiJ U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation ERRATA Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey Page 10, Table 1, item 9: This should read 2,100 feet rather than 2214. Page 12, Table 1, item 47,footnote 1: Modifications to Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised the dam elevation and lowered the spillway sill elevation. The original dam elevation was 2142 and the spiliway elevation (top of radial gates) was 2136. Page 13. Table 2, ,foolnole 7: Computed sediment expressed as a percentage of total computed sediment (182,185 acre-feet). REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE FormApproved J 0MB No. 0704-0188 Pubhc reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the cotlection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suit 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paper-work Reduction Report (0704-0188), Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 1996 Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTiTLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey PR 6. AUTHOR(S) Joe Lyons and Lori Lest 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bureau of Reclamation REPORT NUMBER Technical Service Center Denver CO 80225 9.
[Show full text]
Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Ofﬁ ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Ofﬁ ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
[Show full text]
Dark Sky Sanctuaries in Arizona
Dark Sky Sanctuaries in Arizona Eric Menasco NPS Terry Reiners Arizona is the astrotourism capital of the United States. Its diverse landscape—from the Grand Canyon and ponderosa forests in the north to the Sonoran Desert and “sky islands” in the south—is home to more certified Dark Sky Places than any other U.S. state. In fact, no country outside the U.S. can rival Arizona’s 16 dark-sky communities and parks. Arizona helped birth the dark-sky preservation movement when, in 2001, the International Dark Sky Association (IDA) designated Flagstaff as the world’s very first Dark Sky Place for the city’s commitment to protecting its stargazing- friendly night skies. Since then, six other Arizona communities—Sedona, Big Park, Camp Verde, Thunder Mountain Pootseev Nightsky and Fountain Hills—have earned Dark Sky status from the IDA. Arizona also boasts nine Dark Sky Parks, defined by the IDA as lands with “exceptional quality of starry nights and a nocturnal environment that is specifically protected for its scientific, natural, educational, cultural heritage, and/or public enjoyment.” The most famous of these is Grand Canyon National Park, where remarkably beautiful night skies lend draw-dropping credence to the Park Service’s reminder that “half the park is after dark Of the 16 Certified IDA International Dark Sky Communities in the US, 6 are in Arizona. These include: • Big Park/Village of Oak Creek, Arizona • Camp Verde, Arizona • Flagstaff, Arizona • Fountain Hills, Arizona • Sedona, Arizona • Thunder Mountain Pootsee Nightsky- Kaibab Paiute Reservation, Arizona Arizona Office of Tourism—Dark Skies Page 1 Facebook: @arizonatravel Instagram: @visit_arizona Twitter: @ArizonaTourism #VisitArizona Arizona is also home to 10 Certified IDA Dark Sky Parks, including: Northern Arizona: Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument Offering multiple hiking trails around this former volcanic cinder cone, visitors can join rangers on tours to learn about geology, wildlife, and lava flows.
[Show full text]
SURVEY of REAERATION NEEDS on BUREAU of RECLAMATION PROJECTS ,-->,-\ N Z G 3
PAP 2 HYDRAULICS BRANCH OFFICIAL FILE COPY c SURVEY OF REAERATION NEEDS ON BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PROJECTS ,-->,-\ N z g 3 by E. J. Carlson Hydraulics Branch Division of General Research Engineering and Research Center Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado February 1972 OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1001 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.0 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum Memorandum Denver, Colorado TO Chief, Division of General Research, DATE: June 30, 1972 Regional Director, Region 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 FROM E. J. Carlson SUBJECT: Completion of Study Team Report The report, "Survey of Reaeration Needs on Bureau Projects," was prepared from data obtained mainly from Regional Personnel. Copies of the report are being furnished to all regional offices. By this memorandum regional offices are asked to review the report and make suggestions for changes and additions. The information may be helpful in starting projects which will be required in the near future to meet states' water quality standards. Problem areas in one region may serve as reminders for future problem areas in other regions. The Reaeration Research Program Management Team is available to assist Bureau offices in solving problems caused by oxygen deficiency in reser- voirs, lakes, streams,-canals, and aquifers. The information in the report will also be used by other public agencies and private companies and individuals. The report includes survey-type information and does not reflect policy of the Bureau. i Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan SOIU-108 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The survey of reaeration needs on Bureau of Reclamation Projects was conducted in the Hydraulics Branch under the supervision of the Reaeration Research Program Management Team.
[Show full text]
1976 Link Is to a PDF File
t • I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 125 SCALE OF MILES Annual Report Operation of the Colorado· River Basin 1976 Projected Operations 1977 u.s. Department of the Interior Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary Bureau of Reclamation Gilbert G. Stamm, Commissioner January 1977 Table·of Contents Introduction ii Authority for ·Report ii Actual .Operations under Criteria-Water Year 1976 1 Upper Basin Reservoirs 2 Lo~er Bas1nReservoirs __ ------------------------------~------------ 14 River Regulations 20 Beneficial Consumptive Uses 21 Upper Basin Uses 21 Lo~er Basin Uses and· Losses 21 Water Quality Control 22 Water Quality Operations during Water Year 1976 22 Enhancement of Fish and Wildlife 23 Upper Basin 23 Lo~erBasin 23 Preservation· of Environment 24 Projected Plan of Operation under Criteria for Current Year ~------------------------------------------__ 26 Determination Storage" 26 Lower Basin Requirements 27 Plan of Operation-Water Year 1977 29 Upper Basin Reservoirs 30 Lo~er Basin Reservoirs 31 (Prepared pursuant to the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968, Public Law 90-537) Intr cti The operation of the Colorado River Basin during the past year and the projected operation for the current year reflect domestic use, irrigation, hydro electric power generation, water quality control, fish and wi Idl ife propagation, recreation, flood control, and Colorado River Compact require ments. Storage and release of water from the Upper Basin reservoirs recognize all applicable laws and relevant factors governing the Colorado River, in cluding the impoundment of water in the Upper Basin required by section 602(a) of Public Law 90-537. The operation of the Lower Basin reser voirs reflects Mexican Treaty obligations and Lower Basin contractual commitments.
[Show full text]
Natural Capital in the Colorado River Basin
NATURE’S VALUE IN THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN NATURE’S VALUE IN THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN JULY, 2014 AUTHORS David Batker, Zachary Christin, Corinne Cooley, Dr. William Graf, Dr. Kenneth Bruce Jones, Dr. John Loomis, James Pittman ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was commissioned by The Walton Family Foundation. Earth Economics would like to thank our project advisors for their invaluable contributions and expertise: Dr. Kenneth Bagstad of the United States Geological Survey, Dr. William Graf of the University of South Carolina, Dr. Kenneth Bruce Jones of the Desert Research Institute, and Dr. John Loomis of Colorado State University. We would like to thank our team of reviewers, which included Dr. Kenneth Bagstad, Jeff Mitchell, and Leah Mitchell. We would also like to thank our Board of Directors for their continued support and guidance: David Cosman, Josh Farley, and Ingrid Rasch. Earth Economics research team for this study included Cameron Otsuka, Jacob Gellman, Greg Schundler, Erica Stemple, Brianna Trafton, Martha Johnson, Johnny Mojica, and Neil Wagner. Cover and layout design by Angela Fletcher. The authors are responsible for the content of this report. PREPARED BY 107 N. Tacoma Ave Tacoma, WA 98403 253-539-4801 www.eartheconomics.org [email protected] ©2014 by Earth Economics. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. FUNDED BY EARTH ECONOMICS i ABSTRACT This study presents an economic characterization of the value of ecosystem services in the Colorado River Basin, a 249,000 square mile region spanning across mountains, plateaus, and low-lying valleys of the American Southwest.
[Show full text]
Fill Mead First: a Technical Assessment1 Executive Summary
Fill Mead First: a technical assessment1 John C. Schmidt2 with contributions from Maggi Kraft3, Daphnee Tuzlak4, and Alex Walker3 White Paper No. 1 Center for Colorado River Studies Quinney College of Natural Resources Utah State University November 10, 2016 Executive Summary The Fill Mead First (FMF) plan would establish Lake Mead reservoir as the primary water storage facility of the main-stem Colorado River and would relegate Lake Powell reservoir to a secondary water storage facility to be used only when Lake Mead is full. The objectives of the FMF plan are to re-expose some of Glen Canyon’s sandstone walls that are now inundated, begin the process of re-creating a riverine ecosystem in Glen Canyon, restore a more natural stream-flow, temperature, and sediment-supply regime of the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon ecosystem, and reduce system-wide water losses caused by evaporation and movement of reservoir water into ground-water storage. The FMF plan would be implemented in three phases. Phase I would involve lowering Lake Powell to the minimum elevation at which hydroelectricity can still be produced (called minimum power pool elevation): 3490 ft asl (feet above sea level). At this elevation, the water surface area of Lake 1 suggested citation: Schmidt, J. C., Kraft, M., Tuzlak, D., and Walker, A. 2016. Fill Mead First: a technical assessment. Logan, Utah State University Quinney College of Natural Resources, Center for Colorado River Studies, white paper no. 1, 80 p., available at <https://qcnr.usu.edu/wats/colorado_river_studies/>. 2 corresponding author; Department of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan UT 84322-5210; [email protected] 3 graduate student, Department of Watershed Sciences 4 graduate student, Department of Geology 1 Powell is approximately 77 mi2, which is 31% of the surface area when the reservoir is full.
[Show full text]
Brief Overview of the Geology and Mineral Resources of the Tonto Basin, Gila County, Arizona Stephen M
Brief Overview of the Geology and Mineral Resources of the Tonto Basin, Gila County, Arizona Stephen M. Richard Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-11 June 1999 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Ari zona Geological Survey standards TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Description of Geology ................................................................................................................... 3 Physiography .............................................................................................................................. 3 Rock Units .................................................................................................................................. 3 Precambrian and Paleozoic rocks ........................................................................................... 3 Tertiary rocks .......................................................................................................................... 4 Quaternary deposits ................................................................................................................ 5 Geologic History and Tectonics ................................................................................................. 5 Mineral deposits and mineralization in the Tonto Basin area ......................................................... 7 Potential for the Occurrence
[Show full text]
Historical Overview and Limnological Reconnaissance of Theodore Roosevelt Lake, Arizona by LISA K
Historical Overview and Limnological Reconnaissance of Theodore Roosevelt Lake, Arizona By LISA K. HAM U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95 4053 Prepared in cooperation with the ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Tucson, Arizona 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 375 South Euclid Avenue Denver Federal Center Tucson, AZ 85719-6644 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Definition of terms........................................................................................................................................ VI Abstract........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgments...............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Roosevelt Dam Modification Collection
Guide to MS 194 Roosevelt Dam – Modifications 1990 Two Boxes 2003.469 Processed by Unknown Reviewed and Updated by Diane Ledger Donated by Library and Archives Arizona Historical Society Central Arizona Division Arizona Historical Society at Papago Park, 1300 N. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85281 Phone: 480-387-5355, Email: [email protected] HISTORICAL NOTE Theodore Roosevelt Dam is on the Salt River located northeast of Phoenix, Arizona. The dam is 357 feet (109 m) high and was built between 1905 and 1911, and renovated 1989 - 1996. The dam has a hydroelectric generating capacity of 36,000 kW. The dam forms the Theodore Roosevelt Lake as it impounds the Salt River. Construction on Roosevelt Dam began in 1903 at the confluence of Tonto Creek and the Salt River. The primary purpose of the project was to provide water storage for the Salt River Project and flood control through the Salt River Valley. The dam was finished in 1911 after several devastating floods had interrupted the construction progress in 1905. At the time of completion in 1911, it was the largest masonry dam in the world with a height of 280 feet (84 m) and a length of 723 feet (216 m) while Roosevelt Lake was for a time the world's largest artificial reservoir. In 1989, an ambitious expansion and renovation project was begun at Roosevelt Dam. The dam was resurfaced with concrete, by J.A. Jones Construction Company, and its height was raised 77 feet (23 m) to 357 feet (107 m) which had the effect of increasing the storage capacity of Roosevelt Lake by roughly 20%.
[Show full text]
Ca-Lower-Colorado-River-Valley-Pkwy
I • I I I ) I I A REPORT TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ---1 I 'I I I I THE LOWER I COLORADO I RIVER I VALLEY • PARKWAY I I D- '°'le> F; 1-e. ·• NFS- ' f\CAc:.+... \ V"C. , ~ P,of>oseol I ~~~~=-'~c f~l~~c~~w I THE LOWER COLORADO I filVERVALLEYPARKWAY I I I A proposal for a National Parkway and Scenic Recreation Road System along the Lower Colorado River Valley in 'I California, Arizona, and Nevada. I NATIONAL PARK .i DENVER SEfiViC I ·-.-:. a.t ..1flkllb""ll.--';,.i. n II"~ r.· " •· \..' ;: · I ;:~::::.;.;:;.:J I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service I in cooperation with Lower Colorado River Office Bureau of Land Management • PLE~\SE RtTUR?j TO: I February 1969 I , lJnited States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY I WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 I I Dear Mr. President: We are pleased to transmit herewith. a report on the feasibility anc;l desirability of developing a nation~l p;;i.rkwa,y and sc;enic recreation I road system within. the Lower C9l9rado River· Vaiiey in Arizona, Califo~nia, and Nevada, from the Lake Mead National Recreation I Area and Davis Dam on the north to the International Boup.d:;i.ry ~ith Mexico on the south in: the vicinity of San Luis, Arizqna arid Mexic.o.· . ·. ' .. ·.' . ·. I This :i;eport is based on ci. study 11,'lade by the Lower Col<;>rado River Office ap.d the NatiQnal :Par~ Service pf this Depa.rtmep.t with engineerin.g assistance by the Buqlau of Public Roads of the Departmep.t of .
[Show full text]
Environmental Assessment Imperial Dam Facilities Electrical Improvements
Environmental Assessment Imperial Dam Facilities Electrical Improvements U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office Yuma, Arizona July 2013 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultural and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Environmental Assessment Imperial Dam Facilities Electrical Improvements Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office 7301 Calle Agua Salada Yuma, Arizona 85364 i Acronyms and Abbreviations AAC All-American Canal AF Acre-Feet AGFD Arizona Game and Fish Department BMPs Best Management Practices BLM Bureau of Land Management Camp Imperial Dam Camp Site CFR Code of Federal Regulations EA Environmental Assessment EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact HVAC Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning ICAPCD Imperial County Air Pollution Control District IID Imperial Irrigation District ITAs Indian Trust Assets LCR Lower Colorado River LSB Laguna Settling Basin MSCP Multi-Species Conservation Program NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NWR National Wildlife Refuge NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NOx Nitrogen Oxides
[Show full text]