DOCSLIB.ORG

Consumer Environmentalism Versus Environmental Consumerism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consumer Environmentalism Versus Environmental Consumerism Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications Pre. 2011 1999 International environmental law : consumer environmentalism versus environmental consumerism Rajendra Kumar Nayak Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks Part of the Law Commons Nayak, R.K. (1999). International environmental law : consumer environmentalism versus environmental consumerism. Perth, Australia: Edith Cowan University. This Other is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/7074 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. International Environmental Law Consumer Environmentalism versus Environmental Consumerism By Professor Rajendra Kumar Nayak ,~w~;:.f-..• __ ..:.:··• .,,~,· t isiiiv~,.• ,.J.:#ihri:w:..Mm Professor Rajendra Kumar Nayak is Senior Research Professor at the Indian Law Institute and the Executive Chairman of the Environmental and Consumer Protection Foundation (ECPF) based in New Delhi. Professor Nayak has a broad range of interests and expertise in the area of human rights in Third World countries. He has written extensively on international consumer protection law, and international environmental protection legislation. 11 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Consumer Environmentalism v. Environmental Consurmerism 8 Consumer Lifestyles 12 A Chemical Plague through Toxic and 13 Hazardous Materials Bio-Diversity 17 Protecting Bio-Diversity 22 Ceaseless Exploitation of Nature's Wealth 22 Geopolitical Values of Bio-Diversity 26 International Action on Bio-Diversity 26 The Bio-Diversity Treaty 27 Marine Polution 29 Plastic Pollution of the Oceans 30 Egypt's Lake Manzala and its Cleaning 34 lll Black Sea and its Survival 35 Deforestation 37 Sustainable Development 41 Climate Change and Global Warming 44 Climate Change Convention 46 Chemistry of Ozone Layer and its Depletion 48 Wildlife 53 Tiger - The King of the Jungle 57 The Automobile 61 The Persian Gulf Conflict and 64 Environmental Extinction Antartica 69 Land Care Programme in Australia 71 World Heritage Disputes in Australia 72 Debt for Nature Swaps 75 The Emerging International Environmental Law 76 lV Introduction Mother Earth is rich, beautiful, bountiful and kind. This planet, the jewel in space, is the only planet known so far to have such advanced materialistic and spiritualistic forms of life. The history of earth reveals that the life in myriad forms is confined to a life zone of the earth as a thin veneer in the "Biosphere". Scientific studies reveal that after the formation of the earth about 5000 million years ago, life evolved over millions of years. The microscopic organisms appeared on earth about 3000 million years ago as the first evidence of life. This is the simple beginning from which the human species evolved as early as 2 million years ago, while the intermediate stage of primitive land, planet and animals appeared about 1000 million years ago. Thus there exists, I contend, a universal unidirectional evolutionary law from resource to consumer. 1 Through the ages man has constantly been endeavouring to dominate Mother Earth and her vast resources, Has he really succeeded in his untiring efforts? This is the basic issue we are confronted with. If the answer is in affirmative, then at what cost? Do humans know every aspect of the earth and then subject it to command or a mastery over it? To know is good but to know only to destroy is disastrous. In this regard India's late Prime Minister Mrs Indira Gandhi aptly said: It is sad, that in country after country progress has become synonymous with an assault on nature ........ the higher standard of living must be achieved without alienating our people from their heritage and without despoiling nature of its beauty, freshness and purity essential to our lives.2 If we examine the global ecological problem in a philosophical perspective, it has to be recognised unequivocally that the key to a cardinal solution of the ecological problem 1 Rajvanshi, E.P.L. Series I - Compendium on Environmental Protection Law, Foreword (Jaipur, 1985). 2 Ibid. lies in a social reconstruction of the existence and practice of the inhabitants of our Home - the earth on the basis of truly rational interaction with nature.3 Constant flows of scientific and technological innovations have provided unprecedented growth of man's power in relation to nature. Albeit, since the beginning of mechanisation, human species have been inflicting cruel blows after blows on nature. During the contemporary scientific and industrial revolution these blows have been growing in speed and power. Notwithstanding, in producing material wealth humans have more and more not only exhausted non-renewable traditional natural resources but are also unconsciously breaking vitally important links between separate components of the biosphere, and consciously or unconsciously disrupting the life support systems and various vital channels of the biospheral superorganism' s life. Thus, the International Environmental Movement has emerged owing to a fundamental change in human perception of life on earth4 and its species and subspecies. It is much faster than historical transition and change in attitude is obvious and clearly visible at every level of social organisation viz. local, regional, national and international. Indeed an ecological perception of man about the survival of planet has been broadened and the dominance over nature is regarded as a theory of the past. The world may be divided by national boundaries, but all humans are part of one biosphere and environmental degradation. Actions in one country have negative consequences for the rest of the world, for instance all nations face the negative effects of nuclear activities and of the release of carbon dioxide, CFCs etc. Similarly air pollution in any one part of the world can have global effects. "Our Home - the Earth" also finely called in Indian tradition, "Bhavani Vasundhara" is mutely witnessing the early stages of environmental revolution and facing strenuous crisis leading to its collapse and economic decline. It has been observed that: 3 A.D. Ursul (ed.), "Philosophy and the Ecological Problems of Civilisation" (Progress Puhl., Moscow) 6(1983). 4 L.K. Caldwell, International Environmental Policy- Emergence and Dimensions 1 (1991). 2 The attitude and action of modem man towards ecology have been of exploitation. With the result endless economic exploitations of environment and ceaseless dumping of industrial disposals and chemical effluents have created conflict with the laws of nature. 5 Eventually, severe ecological upheavals are in store for the humankind it is chooses to overlook. The original 1980 Global 2000 Report to the United States President is frightening. Two paragraphs summarise the major findings and conclusions of this report: If the present trends continue, the world in 2000 will be more crowded, more polluted, less stable ecologically, and more vulnerable to disruption than the world we line in now. Serious stresses involving population, resources, and development are clearly visible ahead. Despite greater material output, the world's people will be poorer in many ways than they are today. For hundreds of millions of the desperately poor, the outlook for good and other necessities of life will be not better. For many it will be worse. Barring revolutionary advances in technology, life for most people on earth will be more precarious in 2000 than it is now - unless the nations of the world act decisively to alter current trends. There is difference of opinion on this view also which states: If present trends continue, the world in 2000 will be less crowded (though more populated), less polluted, more stable ecologically, and less vulnerable to resource-supply disruption than the world we live in now. Stresses involving population, resources, and environment will be less in future than now. The World's people will be richer in most ways than they are today. The outlook for food and other necessities of life 5 R.K. Nayak, "Environmental Protection and Law? Quest for Future World Order", Rechtstheorie (Monistic or Pluralistic Legal Culture, Pub: Duckner and Humblot, Berlin, Germany) 403 (1991). 3 will be better... Life for most people on earth will be less precarious economically than it is now. 6 A brief survey or environmental audit reveals that the trends are alarming as between 50 and 400 plants and animal species are being extinguished each day. The protective ozone layer over heavily populated areas is thinning as fast as scientists thought just a few hears ago. Fossil fuel burning spewed nearly 6 billions tons of heat trapping carbon into the atmosphere in 1991. 7 The health of the planet has deteriorated at an unprecedented manner since the Stockholm Conference in 1972. During 22 years, farmers have lost nearly 500 billion tons of top soil, roughly equivalent to the agricultural land of India and France through erosion at a time when they were called on to feed 1.6 billion additional people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Transformation of Greenpeace Strategy in the 199Os: from Civil Disobedience to Moderate Movement
    Siti Rokhmawati Susanto, "The Transformation of Greenpeace Strateu in the 1990s: From Civil Disobedienceto Moderate Movement", Global & Strategic, Th I, No 2, Juli-Desem her 2007, 186-205. The Transformation of Greenpeace Strategy in the 199os: From Civil Disobedience to Moderate Movement Siti Rokhmawati Susanto Pengajar pada Jurusan Tlinu Hubungan Internasiona1 FISIP IThiversitas Airlangga, Surabaya. Kecenderungan akan perubahan strategi ba gi sebuah organisasi pergerakan politik adalah kepastian. Hal itu pula yang dialami Greenpeace sebagai sebuah organisasi gerakan lingkungan lintas batas negara, yang pada atval perufiriannya lebih memillh metode resistensi pernbangkangun sipil secara frontal. Namur', seining dengan terjadinya pergeseran penerimaan isu lingkungan sebagai isu internasional, Greenpeace mulai mengurangi model resitensinga menjadi lebih moderat. Dalam konteks ini, perubahan strategi ditujukan unt uk mempertahankan eksistensi dan kontribusi Greenpeace dalam penjagaan kornitemen terhadap lingkungan secara menyeluruh. Oleh karena itu, menjadi sangat penting untuk mengetahtd faktor mendasar yang mendorong terjadinya perubahan strategi fundamental Green peace, sebuah organisasi lingkungan internasional yang telah mengubah wajah lingkungan sangat signifikan sejak berdirinya. Kata kunci: Greenpeace, lingkungan, strategi resistensi pembangkangan sipil, moderat. Introduction As one of the most prominent international environmental movement organisations, Greenpeace can have a significant impact in shaping world environmental policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Environmental Politics: an Interview
    INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS: AN INTERVIEW Transforming Cultures eJournal, Vol. 5 No 1 June 2010 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/TfC Amita Baviskar Abstract Amita Baviskar is a key analyst of environmental politics and culture in India. Her research and publications have addressed the intense conflicts over water, caste and class arising from the Narmada River dams, and she is currently working on the politics of urban conservation and contestations over public space in Delhi in the lead up to the Commonwealth Games. Her publications include her monograph: In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts over Development in the Narmada Valley. (Oxford University Press, 1995); her co-authored book: Untouchability in Rural India, (Sage Publications: New Delhi 2006) and her edited: Waterscapes: The cultural politics of a natural resource, (Uttaranchal: Permanent Black, 2007) This interview was conducted by Nick McClean during Amita’s visit to Sydney for the Cities Nature Justice conference, held 10 – 12 December, 2008, at the University of Technology Sydney. Nick McClean is currently undertaking PhD research at ANU on comparative approaches to conservation in Australia and India. Amita I’m a sociologist at the Institute of Economic Growth in Delhi and most of my work deals with the cultural politics of environment and development in India. I first started out as an amateur naturalist working with Kalpavriksh, an environmental action group in Delhi, which was a group of students in school and college. We were interested in trying to understand environmental problems and conflicts and doing something to resolve them, and that was my first exposure to the ways in which environmental questions in India were not just about, protecting endangered species, etc., or protecting green areas in cities, but were also issues of social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3 the Modern Environmental Movement Lecture 3
    Lecture 3 The Modern Environmental Movement Lecture 3: Outline I. Species of the day II. Beginnings of the Conservation Movement III.The Green Decade IV. The Endangered Species Act (1973) V. The 1980’s and the Post 9/11 World VI. The Rise of New Conservation Strategies (Ecosystem Management) VII.The Conservation Movement Today (Our Next President?) 1 Species of the Day Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis) Threats: Conservation Status: • Habitat loss Endangered, USFWS, 1998 • Habitat fragmentation • Increased predation • Exposure to disease • Increased competition for resources Beginnings of the Conservation Movement Ecosystem Management Preservationist Ethic Muir Resource Conservation Ethic - Pinchot 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2004 Anthropocentrism Romantic-Transcendentalism Thoreau 1985 Emerson Society of Evolutionary- Conservation ecological land ethic Biology Leopold Forest Reserve Act (1891) 2 Beginnings of the Conservation Movement Late 19th Century • Industrial Revolution • Loss of the Western Frontier • Over consumption of natural resources • Rise of the Romantic Transcendental Conservation Ethic Beginnings of the Conservation Movement Romantic Transcendentalism (early to mid-1800’s) Viewed the natura l world as a source not simp ly of material goods, but also of aesthetic satisfaction, philosophical insight, and spiritual solace. Ralph Waldo Emerson Henry David Thoreau “A lake is the landscape's most beautiful and expressive feature. It is Earth's eye; looking into which the beholder measures the depth of his own nature.” ~ Thoreau 3 Beginnings of the Conservation Movement Ecosystem Management Preservationist Ethic Muir Resource Conservation Ethic - Pinchot 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2004 Anthropocentrism Romantic-Transcendentalism Thoreau 1985 Emerson Society of Evolutionary- Conservation ecological land ethic Biology Leopold Forest Reserve Act (1891) Beginnings of the Conservation Movement Preservationist Ethic • Intrinsic value of nature and typified in the romantic- tdtltranscendental movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    Action Earth ACRES Adeline Lo Thank You Ai Xin Society for your invaluable support Anderson Junior College Andrew Tay Assembly of Youth for the Environment So many individuals, food outlets AWARE Balakrishnan Matchap and organizations gave their Betty Hoe invaluable effort, time and Bishan Community Library resources to light the path Bright Hill Temple British Petroleum (BP) towards vegetarianism. Space Bukit Merah Public Library may not have allowed us to list Cat Welfare Society Catherina Hosoi everyone, but all the same, we Central Library of the National Library Board extend our most heartfelt thanks Chong Hua Tong Tou Teck Hwee movement to you. Douglas Teo Dr Raymond Yuen Environmental Challenge Organisation Vegetarian Society (Singapore) ROS Registration No.: ROS/RCB 0123/1999 Singapore 3 Pemimpin Drive, #07-02, Lip Hing Bldg, Charity Registration No.: 1851 UEN: S99SS0065J Family Service Centre (Yishun) Singapore 576147 Foreign Domestic Worker Association (address for correspondence only) Gelin www.vegetarian-society.org Genesis Vegetarian Health Food Restaurant [email protected] Global Indian International School Green Kampung website Greendale Secondary School Green Roundtable Noah’s Ark Natural Animal Sanctuary Guangyang Primary School NUS SAVE GUI (Ground Up Initiative) NutriHub Herty Chen Post Museum Indonesia Vegetarian Society Queensway Secondary School International Vegetarian Union Prof Harvey Neo Juggi Ramakrishnan Raffles Institution Lim Yi Ting Rameshon Murugiah Kevin Tan Rosina Arquati Heng Guan Hou Serene Peh Hort Park Singapore Buddhist Federation Kampung Senang Charity and Education Singapore Kite Association Foundation Singapore Malayalee Association Loving Hut Restaurants Singapore Polytechnic Singapore Sports Council Mahaya Menon Singapore Tourism Board Maria and Ana Laura Rivarola Singapore Vegetarian Meetup Groups ANNUALREPORTFOR2010 Mayura Mohta SPCA Maitreyawira School St Anthony’s Canossian Secondary School Media Corp Straits Times MEVEG (Middle East Vegetarian Group) T.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Footprints of Nations
    ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS OF NATIONS HOW MUCH NATURE DO THEY USE? -- HOW MUCH NATURE DO THEY HAVE? March 10, 1997 Mathis Wackernagel, Larry Onisto, Alejandro Callejas Linares, Ina Susana López Falfán, Jesus Méndez García, Ana Isabel Suárez Guerrero, Ma. Guadalupe Suárez Guerrero With comments and contributions by Gianfranco Bologna, Hazel Henderson, Manfred Max-Neef, Norman Myers, William E. Rees and Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker Illustrations by Iliana Pámanes Centro de Estudios para la Sustentabilidad Universidad Anáhuac de Xalapa Apdo. Postal 653 91000 Xalapa, Ver., MEXICO tel.: ++52 (28) 14-96-11 fax: ++52 (28) 19-15-15 e-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY This “Footprints of Nations” report compares the ecological impact of 52 large nations, inhabited by 80 percent of the world population. It also shows to what extent their consumption can be supported by their local ecological capacity. One key finding is that today, humanity as a whole uses over one third more resources and eco-services than what nature can regenerate. In 1992, this ecological deficit was only one quarter. After introducing the rationale and assessment method for this study, the report explains how such biophysical analyses can help build a sustainable future. A computer diskette is included in this report. It contains the data and the calculations for the ecological footprints for each country. THIS “RIO+5 FORUM” STUDY WAS COMMISSIONED AND FINANCED BY THE EARTH COUNCIL, COSTA RICA.1 1 ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS OF NATIONS Why measure our use of nature? BOX 1: Sustainability and people’s use of nature When the Earth Summit concluded at Rio in 1992, the world was challenged to lessen its Sustainability requires decent and equitable impact on the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • I a Thesis Submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences
    A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Science ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN AGRICULTURE IN MIAMI Jacob POLICZER CEU eTD Collection May 2013 Budapest I Erasmus Mundus Masters Course in Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management MESPOM This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the Master of Science degree awarded as a result of successful completion of the Erasmus Mundus Masters course in Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management (MESPOM) jointly operated by the University of the Aegean (Greece), Central European University (Hungary), Lund University (Sweden) and the University of Manchester (United Kingdom). Supported by the European Commission’s Erasmus Mundus Programme CEU eTD Collection II Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Environmental Ethic from the Ground Up
    Building an Environmental Ethic from the Ground Up Alyson C. Flournoy* TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 54 I. UNEARTHING THE ETHICS EMBEDDED IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ..... 56 A. W here Are W e Headed? ............................................................ 56 B. How Have We Come So Far Without Knowing Where We Are Headed ?................................................................................... 57 C. What Can We Gain from Unearthing the Ethics in Environmental Law ? ................................................................ 62 II. BUILDING AN ETHIC FROM THE GROUND UP ................................... 67 A. Towards a New Ethical Discourse: Stepping Stones ............... 70 B. Sustainabilityas a Stepping Stone............................................ 72 C O N CLUSION ................................................................................................. 79 Professor, University of Florida, Levin College of Law. This paper was presented during the Symposium on "Environmental Ethics and Policy: Bringing Philosophy Down to Earth," University of California, Davis School of Law, April 4, 2003. I am grateful to all the participants in the Symposium for their questions and suggestions. Christopher Stone, in particular, raised some thought-provoking questions that challenged me to clarify my thinking. University of California, Davis [Vol. 37:53 INTRODUCTION Over the last twenty years there has been a remarkable theoretical
    [Show full text]
  • A Hybrid Theory of Environmentalism Steve Matthews Charles Sturt University
    Essays in Philosophy Volume 3 Article 10 Issue 1 Environmental Aesthetics 1-2002 A Hybrid Theory of Environmentalism Steve Matthews Charles Sturt University Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/eip Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Matthews, Steve (2002) "A Hybrid Theory of Environmentalism," Essays in Philosophy: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 10. Essays in Philosophy is a biannual journal published by Pacific nivU ersity Library | ISSN 1526-0569 | http://commons.pacificu.edu/eip/ Matthews -- Essays in Philosophy Essays in Philosophy A Biannual Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 A Hybrid Theory of Environmentalism Abstract The destruction and pollution of the natural environment poses two problems for philosophers. The first is political and pragmatic: which theory of the environment is best equipped to impact policymakers heading as we are toward a series of potential eco- catastrophes? The second is more central: On the environment philosophers tend to fall either side of an irreconcilable divide. Either our moral concerns are grounded directly in nature, or the appeal is made via an anthropocentric set of interests. The lack of a common ground is disturbing. In this paper I attempt to diagnose the reason for this lack. I shall agree that wild nature lacks features of intrinsic moral worth, and that leaves a puzzle: Why is it once we subtract the fact that there is such a lack, we are left with strong intuitions against the destruction and/or pollution of wild nature? Such intuitions can be grounded only in a strong sense of aesthetic concern combined with a common-sense regard for the interests of sentient life as it is indirectly affected by the quality of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Through the Lens of Environmental Sociology: an Introduction
    sustainability Editorial Sustainability through the Lens of Environmental Sociology: An Introduction Md Saidul Islam Division of Sociology, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 14 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637332, Singapore; [email protected]; Tel.: +65-6592-1519 Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen Received: 10 March 2017; Accepted: 15 March 2017; Published: 22 March 2017 Abstract: Our planet is undergoing radical environmental and social changes. Sustainability has now been put into question by, for example, our consumption patterns, loss of biodiversity, depletion of resources, and exploitative power relations. With apparent ecological and social limits to globalization and development, current levels of consumption are known to be unsustainable, inequitable, and inaccessible to the majority of humans. Understanding and achieving sustainability is a crucial matter at a time when our planet is in peril—environmentally, economically, socially, and politically. Since its official inception in the 1970s, environmental sociology has provided a powerful lens to understanding the challenges, possibilities, and modes of sustainability. This editorial, accompanying the Special Issue on “sustainability through the Lens of Environmental Sociology”, first highlights the evolution of environmental sociology as a distinct field of inquiry, focusing on how it addresses the environmental challenges of our time. It then adumbrates the rich theoretical traditions of environmental sociology, and finally examines sustainability through the lens of environmental sociology, referring to various case studies and empirical analyses. Keywords: environmentalism; environmental sociology; ecological modernization; treadmill of production; the earth day; green movement; environmental certification; global agro-food system 1. Introduction: Environmental Sociology as a Field of Inquiry Environmental sociology is the study of how social and ecological systems interact with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Creating Social Justice in Niches of the Environmental Movement
    Intentional Unity: The Challenges of Creating Social Justice in Niches of the Environmental Movement A Division III e-Booklet By Colin Eldridge Read original online version here Original logo designed by and property of Colin Eldridge This project is dedicated to my late father John Charles Eldridge, and my amazing mother JoAnn Ellsworth, without whom I would not be where I am today. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction Section 1: Environment What are Niches in the Environmental Movement? The Problem: Niches in the Environmental Movement are Socially Unjust Histories and Realities of Environmental Movement Niches Work Cited Section 2: Community Excerpts from Interviews Conducted in Intentional Communities A Critique of Diversity Initiatives My Idealist Model for an Anti-Oppressive Intentional Community Section 3: Economy Understanding the Permaculture Ethics The “Sweet Spot” of Fair Share, People Care, and Earth Care Regenerative Economics Section 4: Anti-Oppressive Education The Ladder of Inference Social Permaculture The Systems Thinking Approach The Iceberg Model The Iceberg of Oppression On Paralysis and White Guilt Section 5: Moving Forward More Resources for the Reader What now? Conclusion Glossary 2 Introduction Objectives of this Booklet 1) To point out the inherent flaws within the environmental movement which perpetuate systems of oppression. 2) To reflect on diversity within the niche of intentional communities, and offer excerpts of interviews from an independent field study. 3) To provide a commentary on the “sweet spot” of social, environmental and economic justice. 4) To offer an anti-oppressive educational framework specifically for niches within the environmental movement. About the Author This booklet touches on many subjects of power and privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Environmental Movement Robert J. Brulle Drexel University
    The U.S. Environmental Movement Robert J. Brulle Drexel University Abstract The U.S. environmental movement is perhaps the largest, most long lived, and complex social movement in the U.S. To understand this movement from a sociological viewpoint requires an analysis of the different belief systems or “discursive frames” that define the different communities that make up this movement. This paper starts with a description of these discursive frames. Using this perspective, it then describes the historical development of the different communities, and their relative levels of economic resource mobilization. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The U.S. environmental movement is perhaps the single largest social movement in the United States. With over 6,500 national and 20,000 local environmental organizations, along with an estimated 20-30 million members, this movement dwarfs other modern social movements such as the civil rights or peace movements. It is also the longest running social movement. The first local environmental organizations were founded before the Civil War and several still existing national environmental organizations, such as the Sierra Club, the National Audubon Society, and American Forests, were founded in the late 19th century. The question facing social scientists is how can we understand and examine this enormously complex social movement? There are three commonly used approaches. First, sociologists examine the belief systems that define the various components of this social movement, which is termed Discourse Analysis. Secondly, the development of the social movement over time is examined using Historical Analysis. Finally, the techniques used to garner financial resources for the organization is examined through the perspective of Resource Mobilization Analysis.
    [Show full text]