It's Been 109 Years Since Renmark Horseman Breaker Morant Was Executed but There's a New Fight to Clear His Name

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

It's Been 109 Years Since Renmark Horseman Breaker Morant Was Executed but There's a New Fight to Clear His Name SCAPEGOAT OR KILLER? It’s beEN 109 YEARS SINCE RENMARK HORSEMAN BREAKER MORANT WAS EXECUTED BUT THERE’s A NEW FIGHT TO CLEAR HIS NAME WORDS TANALEE SMITH Edward Woodward as Breaker Morant in the 1980 film. saweekend_april 09 history 13 HARRY Morant wouldn’t recognise Renmark these Morant would never have been heard of much again. But days, especially the pub. The trendy Renmark Hotel of he became friends with some of the local young men and 2011 is a far cry from the rough and ready establishment in 1900 a group of them signed up to help the British into which – legend has it – the Breaker once rode his horse fight the Boers, joining 18,000 other Australians who to order a drink at the bar. Today you can order lunch or a headed to South Africa between 1899 and 1902. He would coffee on the balcony overlooking a trimmed lawn leading never see the town, or Australia, again. Morant joined a to the high Murray River, where a paddleboat waits for regiment known as the Bushveldt Carbineers, made up its daily tour of the locks. In Morant’s time, early last Breaker Morant mostly of Australians. A close friend of his, Capt. Percy century, the outlook from the old stone building would Hunt, was part of this regiment. During leave from the have been more rugged and swampy. fighting, Morant and Hunt had gone to Devon, England, Even so, riding a horse into the pub would still have and become engaged to sisters. But back in South Africa, been wildly uncouth behaviour. Did he really do that? relatives, including Cathy Morant of Canberra – from Hunt was soon captured, tortured and executed by Boers. “With Morant working over the river, this was the only his pursuit for what he claims is true justice. Unkles Morant is said to have vowed revenge. hotel in the area so he and the boys would come over to became interested in Morant’s case about four years ago Accounts vary as to what happened next, but it is clear have a drink and play up,” says historian Y.M. “Johnny” after seeing the film for the umpteenth time. He says it that some members of the Carbineers were responsible Gurr, a former ABC journalist who has spent 40 years in was clear that Morant and his co-accused did not get a for killing several Boer prisoners, as well as a missionary Renmark and wrote a history of the Renmark Hotel. fair trial – and he set out to right that wrong, spending who witnessed the shootings. Within a few weeks, Morant But no, Gurr says, there is no proof to back up the thousands of dollars of his own money and countless and two fellow Australian soldiers – Peter Handcock and story that Morant rode up to the bar on his horse, and hours of his own time. George Witton – were arrested on charges of carrying out no one she interviewed about the hotel’s history could Unkles now says he has uncovered fresh evidence about the killings. In their defence, the Australians claimed substantiate the tale. Nor did he ride up a staircase, as Morant’s innocence that would be embarrassing to Britain commanding officers had ordered the regiment to kill another story has it – there was only one floor. But Gurr’s and one of its former great soldiers, Lord Kitchener. all prisoners as there was not enough food to go around. efforts to debunk the horse myth have proved fruitless. “Even though the case is 109 years old, they’re trying to The British denied this, and Morant and Handcock were Tourists visiting Renmark invariably enter the hotel bar minimise the suggestion that any (inappropriate) orders convicted after a speedy trial and executed on February – named “Breaker’s” in his memory – and ask about the would have been given during the Boer War, much in the 27, 1902. story. No doubt it’s good for business. same way as they would deny any inappropriate action Witton was sentenced to life in prison – later commuted And the story underlines how myth and mystery still in wars in Afghanistan or Iraq,” Unkles says. after 80,000 Australians signed a petition demanding his surround the Breaker, executed in 1902 by a British English-born Morant settled in Renmark sometime release. He returned to Australia and published a memoir military firing squad in South Africa for killing prisoners in the late 1800s, soon after the town was established. of the trial titled, Scapegoats for the Empire, The True during the Boer War. “There was outrage here when he Working as a horse breaker at a station across the River Story of Breaker Morant’s Bushveldt Carbineers. He gave was executed,” says Gurr. “He was a scallywag, but he Murray, Morant would have come to the then brand- a firsthand account of the arrest, trial and sentencing, didn’t deserve that.” The question still being asked today new Renmark Hotel for drinks and to socialise. He may including how the three were denied an appeal or contact is whether he deserves a pardon. also have got some fresh material for the poems he with the Australian government or their relatives. Morant was a horse trainer extraordinaire, a drover, wrote for The Bulletin newspaper, under the penname “Legal errors were made in that trial, significant a poet and probably a womaniser and a conman. But “the Breaker”– much of it about pretty girls and life as errors, not minor ones,” says Unkles, a military lawyer he was also charismatic and dashing, by all accounts, a drover. who has spent nearly 30 years in the Australian Navy which explains why he is still remembered 109 years “We’ve drunk our wine, we’ve kissed our girls, and funds specialising in criminal law, with extensive experience after the controversial court martial and execution. The are sinking low, in military courts martial and civil courts. Unkles says 1980 film Breaker Morant helped solidify his legend, as The horses must be thinking it’s a fair thing now to go; the men were commended during the court martial for did several books and a stage play, and last year the Sling the swags on Condamine and strap the billies fast, their loyal service to the British crown, and several Australian government asked the British government And stuff a bottle in the bags and let’s be off at last. recommendations were made for mercy. In the end, to consider reopening the case to clear Morant’s name. What matter if the creeks are up – the cash, alas, runs down! though, they were given 18 hours’ notice of their Britain rejected the appeal, but that hasn’t deterred A very sure and certain sign we’re long enough in town.” execution, forbidden any contact with their families and military lawyer James Unkles – backed by the Breaker’s If he’d stayed around Renmark, its more than likely denied the right to make a final plea to the King. saweekend_april 09 14 history “The executions were carried out in indecent haste says. “He was certainly talked about a lot in the family. It to prevent any interference from the Australian was always an interesting side of the family.” government,” Unkles says. “In fact, the Australian Cathie Morant joined forces with Unkles not to make government didn’t even know these men had been a mockery of the British court martial but just to find arrested and placed on trial until months later, as the justice for her ancestor, who she believes was treated trial was carried out in secrecy.” unfairly. “Three colonial officers, who had little or no Unkles’ research was recognised by Attorney-General Historian Y. M. Gurr military experience in the field and no understanding Robert McClelland, who last year petitioned Britain in Breaker’s bar of military laws and customs, were held liable while for pardons for Morant, Handcock and Witton. Also, in in Renmark. their British superiors were not prosecuted,” says the March 2010, the Australian House of Representatives’ letter signed by 12 descendants, most of them related Petition Committee held a public inquiry into the to Handcock. “Despite this, we do not wish to engage in petition, marking the first time an Australian institution uncovered new documents that he says strengthen his accusations of scapegoating or sentiments which could had considered Morant’s case. Although it had no case. “I have strong and compelling evidence to push for bring the British military into disrepute. That is not jurisdiction, the committee concluded that the case for a judicial inquiry,” he says. “Late last year I discovered our agenda. We believe there are grounds for pardoning pardons was “strong and compelling”. new evidence that confirms that orders to shoot prisoners Harry Morant, Peter Handcock and George Witton, However, last October the British government rejected had been given by British officers who worked for Lord recognising the mitigating circumstances surrounding the petition on the grounds that there was insufficient Kitchener, who was the supreme commander in South the offences.” evidence to justify a review, saying the records from Africa.” This new evidence includes the written opinion Cathie Morant has high hopes for restoring her 1902 were too scant. McClelland, through a spokesman, of Colonel St. Claire, the most senior British legal officer ancestor’s honour and clearing his name. “I’ve had explained in a statement why the Australian government in South Africa at the time. According to Unkles, the discussions with people in the last couple of years and had become involved.
Recommended publications
  • Bruce Beresford's Breaker Morant Re-Viewed
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 30, núm. 1 (2020) · ISSN: 2014-668X The Boers and the Breaker: Bruce Beresford’s Breaker Morant Re-Viewed ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract This essay is a re-viewing of Breaker Morant in the contexts of New Australian Cinema, the Boer War, Australian Federation, the genre of the military courtroom drama, and the directing career of Bruce Beresford. The author argues that the film is no simple platitudinous melodrama about military injustice—as it is still widely regarded by many—but instead a sterling dramatization of one of the most controversial episodes in Australian colonial history. The author argues, further, that Breaker Morant is also a sterling instance of “telescoping,” in which the film’s action, set in the past, is intended as a comment upon the world of the present—the present in this case being that of a twentieth-century guerrilla war known as the Vietnam “conflict.” Keywords: Breaker Morant; Bruce Beresford; New Australian Cinema; Boer War; Australian Federation; military courtroom drama. Resumen Este ensayo es una revisión del film Consejo de guerra (Breaker Morant, 1980) desde perspectivas como la del Nuevo Cine Australiano, la guerra de los boers, la Federación Australiana, el género del drama en una corte marcial y la trayectoria del realizador Bruce Beresford. El autor argumenta que la película no es un simple melodrama sobre la injusticia militar, como todavía es ampliamente considerado por muchos, sino una dramatización excelente de uno de los episodios más controvertidos en la historia colonial australiana. El director afirma, además, que Breaker Morant es también una excelente instancia de "telescopio", en el que la acción de la película, ambientada en el pasado, pretende ser una referencia al mundo del presente, en este caso es el de una guerra de guerrillas del siglo XX conocida como el "conflicto" de Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Guide by Robert Lewis
    © ATOM 2014 A STUDY GUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS http://www.metromagazine.com.au ISBN: 978-1-74295-450-9 http://www.theeducationshop.com.au OVERVIEW In 1902 two Australian soldiers were CURRICULUM arrested for killing prisoners, held in APPLICABILITY prison, allowed access to a lawyer to but his trial and hasty execution was Breaker Morant: The Retrial prepare their defence only one day a cover up for commanding officers is a resource that be used by before the trial started, denied access who issued orders to take no prison- middle and upper secondary to a key witness during the trial, found ers which they later denied. The high students in guilty, and sentenced to death. They command was imposing a program were executed one day after they were of murder and near genocide in a History: told they had been found guilty. campaign to subjugate the local Boer - The development of population in South Africa all for the Australian national identity Could this be a fair trial? purpose of controlling the newly dis- - Federation and the Early covered goldfields. Commonwealth Should an injustice be righted even - Australia and the Boer War after more than 100 years? This was the first war to be filmed by Legal Studies: the newly invented movie camera and - Law and Justice The two soldiers who were treated this the international telegraph meant that way were Lt Harry ‘Breaker’ Morant for the first time events across the Film Studies: and Lt Peter Handcock. world could be on the front page the - Documentary Film next day. The film Breaker Morant The Retrial (Gregory Miller And Nick Bleszynski, In this film fully dramatised scenes 2013, 2 x 52 minute episodes) expos- illustrate the complex story.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Concentration Camp Policy During the Anglo-Boer War
    Barbaric methods in the Anglo-Boer War Using Barbaric Methods in South Africa: The British Concentration Camp Policy during the Anglo-Boer War James Robbins Jewell. The Boer War, which is frequently referred to as Britain's Vietnam or Afghanistan, was marked by gross miscalculations on the part of both British military and political leaders. In their efforts to subdue the Boers, Britain used more troops, spent more money, and buried more soldiers than anytime between the Napoleonic wars and World War I - a century during which it had been busy expanding its empire. Despite the miscalculations, lapses in judgement, and blatant stupidity demonstrated throughout the war by the British leaders, historically speaking, one policy remains far more notorious than any other. Unable to bring the war to a conclusion through traditional fighting, the British military, and in particular the two men who were in command, Frederick, Baron Roberts and Herbert, Baron Kitchener, responded to the Boer use of guerilla warfare by instituting a scorched earth combined with a concentration camp policy.! Nearly forty years later, Lord Kitchener's decision to institute a full-scale concentration camp strategy came back to haunt the British. On the eve of the Second World War, when a British ambassador to Gernlany protested Nazi camps, Herman Goering rebuffed the criticism by pulling out an encyclopedia and looking up the entry for concentration camps, which credited the British with being the first to use them in the Boer War.2 Under the scrutiny that comes with the passage of time, the concentration camp policy has rightfully been viewed as not only inhumane, but hopelessly flawed.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONNAISSANCE Autumn 2021 Final
    Number 45 | Autumn 2021 RECONNAISSANCE The Magazine of the Military History Society of New South Wales Inc ISSN 2208-6234 BREAKER MORANT: The Case for A Pardon Battle of Isandlwana Women’s Wartime Service Reviews: Soviet Sniper, Villers-Bretonneux, Tragedy at Evian, Atom Bomb RECONNAISSANCE | AUTUMN 2021 RECONNAISSANCE Contents ISSN 2208-6234 Number 45 | Autumn 2021 Page The Magazine of the Military History Society of NSW Incorporated President’s Message 1 Number 45 | Autumn 2021 (June 2021) Notice of Next Lecture 3 PATRON: Major General the Honourable Military History Calendar 4 Justice Paul Brereton AM RFD PRESIDENT: Robert Muscat From the Editor 6 VICE PRESIDENT: Seumas Tan COVER FEATURE Breaker Morant: The Case for a Pardon 7 TREASURER: Robert Muscat By James Unkles COUNCIL MEMBERS: Danesh Bamji, RETROSPECTIVE Frances Cairns 16 The Battle of Isandlwana PUBLIC OFFICER/EDITOR: John Muscat By Steve Hart Cover image: Breaker Morant IN FOCUS Women’s Wartime Service Part 1: Military Address: PO Box 929, Rozelle NSW 2039 26 Service By Dr JK Haken Telephone: 0419 698 783 Email: [email protected] BOOK REVIEWS Yulia Zhukova’s Girl With A Sniper Rifle, review 28 Website: militaryhistorynsw.com.au by Joe Poprzeczny Peter Edgar’s Counter Attack: Villers- 31 Blog: militaryhistorysocietynsw.blogspot.com Bretonneux, review by John Muscat Facebook: fb.me/MHSNSW Tony Matthews’ Tragedy at Evian, review by 37 David Martin Twitter: https://twitter.com/MHS_NSW Tom Lewis’ Atomic Salvation, review by Mark 38 Moore. Trove: https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-532012013 © All material appearing in Reconnaissance is copyright. President’s Message Vice President, Danesh Bamji and Frances Cairns on their election as Council Members and John Dear Members, Muscat on his election as Public Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • An Infantry Officer in Court – a Review of Major James Francis Thomas As Defending Officer for Lieutenants Breaker Morant, Pe
    An Infantry Officer In Court – A Review of Major James Francis Thomas as Defending Officer for Lieutenants Breaker Morant, Peter Handcock and George Witton – Boer War Commander James Unkles, RANR Introduction Four men from Australia who joined the Boer war were to be connected by destiny in events that still intrigue historians to this day. Harry ‘Breaker’ Morant, Peter Handcock, George Ramsdale Witton and James Francis Thomas were to meet in circumstances that saw Morant and Handcock executed and Witton sentenced to life imprisonment following military Courts Martial in 1902. This article attempts to review the experiences of Major Thomas, a mounted infantry officer from Tenterfield who joined British Forces as a volunteer and ended up defending six officers, including Breaker Morant on charges of shooting Boer prisoners History of the Boer Wars 1880 - 1902 The Boer War commenced on 11 October 1899, and was fought in three distinct phases. During the first phase the Boers were in the ascendancy. In their initial offensive moves, 20,000 Boers swept into British Natal and encircled the strategic rail junction at Ladysmith. In the following weeks, Boer troops besieged the townships of Mafeking and Kimberley. Phase 1 reached its climax in what has become known as ‘Black Week’ – 10 to15 December 1899. In this one week, three British armies, each seeking to relieve the besieged townships, suffered massive and humiliating defeats in the battles of Stormberg, Magersfontein and Colenso. These defeats shook the British Empire. In response, Britain despatched two regular divisions and replaced the ill-starred General Sir Redvers Buller, with the Empire’s most eminent soldier, Field Marshall Lord Roberts VC, as its commander in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Knowledge 35 Spring 2014
    The Magazine of the Mechanics’ Institutes Of Victoria Inc. UsefulNo. Knowledge35 – Spring 2014 PO Box 1080, Windsor VIC 3181 Australia ISSN 1835-5242 Reg No. A0038156G ABN 60 337 355 989 Price: Five Dollars $5 "LEST WE FORGET" There would hardly be a Hall in Victoria or its Some of those who returned formed Soldier adjoining Reserve, or a nearby cenotaph that Settlements, or laboured at community projects, the words ‘Lest we Forget’ are not recorded. like the Great Ocean Road. The phrase is from Rudyard Kipling’s The A hundred years on this is an opportunity for Recessional penned for Queen Victoria’s your Hall, your community to… ‘remember them’. Diamond Jubilee in 1897. This Anzac Day why ‘Lest we forget – Lest we not also remember ‘the forget’ is repeated after going down of the sun’ an entreaty that we will with a lowering of the first four verses as on far off battlefields of Jesus Christ. kick on to a ‘welcome notThose forget threethe sacrifice iconic home’the flag. dance It couldto all localthen words ‘Lest we forget’ service personnel. A are often added at the conclusion of Laurence of Will Longstaff’s Menin Gate at midnight by Will Longstaff Binyon’s famousreflection painting at midnight ‘Menin For the Fallen. Photo from: Collection Database of the Australian ‘They shall not grow old, Gate at Midnight’ when War Memorial under the ID Number: ART09807 as we that are left grow those ghostly legions old/ Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn./ At the going of white crosses or any resting place, with the down of the sun and in the morning,/ We will sounding of The Reveillerise and aagain Roll Call from of district fields remember them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Friendly Society Movement in Victoria 1835–1920
    The Influence of the Friendly Society Movement in Victoria 1835–1920 Roland S. Wettenhall Post Grad. Dip. Arts A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 24 June 2019 Faculty of Arts School of Historical and Philosophical Studies The University of Melbourne ABSTRACT Entrepreneurial individuals who migrated seeking adventure, wealth and opportunity initially stimulated friendly societies in Victoria. As seen through the development of friendly societies in Victoria, this thesis examines the migration of an English nineteenth-century culture of self-help. Friendly societies may be described as mutually operated, community-based, benefit societies that encouraged financial prudence and social conviviality within the umbrella of recognised institutions that lent social respectability to their members. The benefits initially obtained were sickness benefit payments, funeral benefits and ultimately medical benefits – all at a time when no State social security systems existed. Contemporaneously, they were social institutions wherein members attended regular meetings for social interaction and the friendship of like-minded individuals. Members were highly visible in community activities from the smallest bush community picnics to attendances at Royal visits. Membership provided a social caché and well as financial peace of mind, both important features of nineteenth-century Victorian society. This is the first scholarly work on the friendly society movement in Victoria, a significant location for the establishment of such societies in Australia. The thesis reveals for the first time that members came from all strata of occupations, from labourers to High Court Judges – a finding that challenges conventional wisdom about the class composition of friendly societies.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN VETERAN NEWS Article D2.Indd
    War crimes and the sanctity of the rule of law: The trial of Lieutenants Morant, Handcock and Witton By James Unkles “It does no good to act without the fullest inquiry and strictly on legal lines. A hasty judgment creates a martyr and unless military law is strictly followed, a sense of injustice having been done is the result” [i] “They were treated monstrously. Certainly by today’s standards they were not given any of the human rights that international treaties require men facing the death penalty be given. But even by the standards of 1902 they were treated improperly, unlawfully’. [ii] Australians have genuine regard and respect for their defence forces and such allegations are confronting. However, an equal injustice and affront to Australia’s values enshrined in our democratic institutions and judicial independence is an abrogation of due legal process for political and other agendas. Leo D’Angelo Fisher’s insightful article on alleged ADF war crimes and its refl ection on the failure of leadership in the ADF presents [iii] an opportunity to balance the assessment of allegations war crimes with the signifi cance of the preservation and promotion of the rule of rule in ensuring those accused are given the presumption of innocence, proof beyond reasonable doubt and treated in accordance with common and statutory law. Nothing less is unacceptable in a civilised society. Leo D’Angelo Fisher rightly draws comment on the trial of Lieutenants Harry Breaker Morant, Peter Hancock and George Witton, three Australian volunteers arrested, trial and sentence for alleged war crimes during the Anglo Boer War of 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Methodology and Breaker Morant
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Closing the Debate: Critical Methodology and Breaker Morant RICHARD HAINES This essay is an attempt to close a debate conducted in Vol 2 No 3, 1982, of CH.-Ltic.CLl kuti regarding the film B/teafee* Moiant. The issue contained criticisms by Peter Strauss and MM Carlin, of articles by Susan Gardner and Michael Vaughan in a Cnltlc.a.1 Ktiti monograph on the film, and the responses of Gardner and Vaughan to these critics. A subsequent letter by Carlin, appear- ing in this issue, restates his position and replies to Gardner and Vaughan's dismissal of his argument. Though Carlin and Strauss see themselves occupying conservative and left-wing positions respectively, both consider Gardner's analysis of the film, and Vaughan's discussion of Kit Denton's book The Bizakti, as exercises in sociological overkill and moral pedantry. They also feel that the film was more question- ing of imperialism than Gardner and Vaughan allow. For Strauss, George Witton plays a 'pivotal role' in the film, his disillusionment with British imperialism reflecting "the viewer's own supposed progress to a greater understanding of the brutal reality of imperialism"2. And, as Susan Gardner remarks, Strauss is right to insist that Witton be accorded more attention. Yet Witton's bewilderment at the arbitrariness of the British im- perial army and his disenchantment with 'Empire' (a more distant concept for him than the army) don't seem to me to vividly specify a sense of "the brutal reality of imperialism".
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's South African War 1899-19021
    http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za Australia's South African war 1899-19021 DR CRAIG WILCOX Australian War Memorial historian o/the Anglo-Boer War, Sydney, Australia Around twenty thousand Australians fought in the great war between the British empire and the republics of the Orange Free State and the Transvaal. Those Australians constituted five in every thousand of their people, or three in every two hundred of their male workers. In South Africa they made up just one in every twenty-five soldiers in a British army of almost half a million.2 As these bald figures immediately suggest, Australia's contribution to the war was too small to be decisive, and its experience of the war involved too few of its people to make a powerful impact on its society, let alone wrench its history onto some different course. Still, that contribution and that experience were unprecedented for a people who had never before gone to war as a people, and deserve more attention - and more balanced, dispassionate, critical attention - than they've yet received from historians of the war, of Australia, and of the British empire.3 In this lecture I'll strive for such balance by outlining why and how Australians went to war in South Africa, what their soldiers did there, and the war's legacy for their country and their descendants today. This lecture, presented at the South African Military Academy on 28 September 1999, rests on research toward a new history of Australians and the South African war commissioned by the Australian War Memorial in Canberra and due for publication in May 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • ':, Bruce Beresford's ~Breaker Morant'
    Kunapipi Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 6 1981 Can you imagine anything more Australian?':, Bruce Beresford's ~Breaker Morant' Susan Gardner Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Gardner, Susan, Can you imagine anything more Australian?':, Bruce Beresford's ~Breaker Morant', Kunapipi, 3(1), 1981. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol3/iss1/6 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Can you imagine anything more Australian?':, Bruce Beresford's ~Breaker Morant' Abstract The guerrilla war was fast brutalizing both adversaries. The worst scandals on the British side concerned colonial irregulars - Australians, Canadians and South Africans - whose official contingents, onicallyir , had won a reputation for gallantry in so many set-piece battles. The most notorious case involved a special anti-commando unit, raised by Australians to fight in the wild northern Transvaal, and called the Bush Veldt Carbineers. Six of its officers (five Australians, one Englishman) were court-martialled for multiple murder. The facts were admitted: in August 1901, 12 Boers, earlier taken prisoner, had been shot by the Carbineers on the orders of their officers. Theustr A alians' defence: as a reprisal, shooting prisoners was now accepted practice. Two of the Australian officers, Lieutenants 'Breaker' Morant and Handcock, were executed in February 1902, on the orders of Kitchener. The affair caused an outcry in Australia. There arose a misconception (still current) that foreign political pressures had induced Kitchener to make scapegoats of Morant and Handcock.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of Breaker Morant
    military history History of the Boer Wars Kitchener’s predecessor:2 treated with no less consideration than 1880 - 1902 ‘There are no more great battles to were the Boers who were responsible for The second Boer War commenced be won, the war has degenerated into similar outrages. The Boers were usually on 11 October 1899, and was fought guerrilla warfare’. set free by their own military courts In Defence of 6 in three distinct phases. During and later by civilian courts.’ the first phase the Boers were in The Bushveldt Carbineers (BVC) the ascendancy. In their initial The task of hunting down the James Francis Thomas offensive moves, 20,000 Boers swept remaining Boer commandos required new Born on 25 August 1861, Thomas Breaker Morant into British Natal and encircled the and irregular military formations. These attended school in Sydney and strategic rail junction at Ladysmith. new formations were to be manned, in graduated in law from Sydney University. In the following weeks, Boer troops the most part, by colonial troops who He established a law firm in Tenterfield A Review of Major James Francis Thomas, besieged the townships of Mafeking had won a reputation for independence, and became a notable community leader. and Kimberley. Phase 1 reached its initiative and ‘hardness’. Qualities which ‘In Tenterfield the sort of law that needed climax in what has become known matched those of the bittereinders. practising was pretty straightforward, Defending Officer as ‘Black Week’ – 10 to15 December Morant, Handcock and Witton wills, conveyancing, bills of sale, nothing 1899. In this one week, three British joined the BVC and served along side dramatic or outstanding.’7 In addition Commander James Unkles, RANR Four men from Australia who joined imprisonment following military Courts armies, each seeking to relieve the volunteers from United States, New to his social pursuits, Thomas took If you encounter any Boers, You the Boer war were to be connected by Martial in 1902.
    [Show full text]