Town of Marlborough LWRP and Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee, with Assistance from Behan Planning and Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Town of Marlborough LWRP and Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee, with Assistance from Behan Planning and Design Town of Marlborough, NY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SEPTEMBER 2020 PREPARED BY: Cover Page Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP), Comprehensive Plan, and Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) For the Town of Marlborough, New York Title of the Action: Adoption of the Town of Marlborough Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) including a Harbor Management Plan, Local Consistency Review Law, and Harbor Management Law; and adoption of the Town of Marlborough Comprehensive Plan Project Location: Town of Marlborough, Ulster County, New York Lead Agency: Town of Marlborough Town Board 21 Milton Turnpike, Suite 200/ PO Box 305 Milton, NY 12547 Contact: Alphonso Lanzetta, Town Supervisor 845-795-5100 Prepared by: Town of Marlborough LWRP and Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee, with assistance from Behan Planning and Design Comprehensive Plan Adopted: December 11, 2017 LWRP Adopted: Town of Marlborough Town Board, May 11, 2020 LWRP Approved: New York State Secretary of State, Rossana Rosado, November 12, 2020 Concurred: U.S. Office for Coastal Management, May 25, 2021 This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) has been prepared and approved in accordance with provisions of the Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing Regulations (19 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation of this Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State Coastal Management Program as a program change has been obtained in accordance with provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (P.L. 92‐583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR 923). The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Coastal Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. [Federal Grant No. NA‐17‐NOS‐ 4190050]. The New York State Coastal Management Program and the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are administered by the New York State Department of State, Office of Planning, Development & Community Infrastructure, 99 Washington Avenue, Suite 1010, Albany, New York 12231‐0001. May 25, 2021 Ms. Sarah Crowell New York Coastal Management Program New York State Department of State 99 Washington Ave., Suite 1010 Albany, NY 12231 Dear Ms. Crowell, Thank you for the March 31, 2021 request for approval of changes to the New York Coastal Management Program pursuant to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) regulations at 15 CFR part 923, subpart H with the incorporation of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) for the Town of Marlborough into the New York Coastal Management Program (NY CMP).1 NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management approves the request subject to the qualifications below. NOAA’s regulations require that the state post this decision by the Office for Coastal Management for public notice.2 The public notice should state that as of the date of this decision letter the enforceable policies identified in the attached Table of Approved Changes shall be applicable in reviewing federal actions pursuant to the federal consistency requirements of the CZMA and its implementing regulations found at 15 CFR part 930.3 Please send a copy of the public notice to the Office for Coastal Management for our records to close out this file. PUBLIC AND FEDERAL AGENCY COMMENTS The Office for Coastal Management did not receive any comments on this program change submission. CHANGES APPROVED See the attached Table of Approved Changes to the New York Coastal Management Program. 1 This program change request was submitted under NOAA’s revised CZMA program change regulations at 15 CFR part 923, subpart H (84 Federal Register (FR) 38118 (Aug. 6, 2019)). The Office for Coastal Management’s decision due date, originally April 30, 2021, was extended to May 21, 2021. 2 15 CFR § 923.81(e)(5), as described at 84 FR 38133 (Aug. 6, 2019). 3 15 CFR § 923.81(f), as described at 84 FR 38133 (Aug. 6, 2019). QUALIFICATIONS As with previous approvals of NY CMP LWRPs, the enforceable provisions of Section III are only the stated policies and sub-policies. The enforceable policies do not include the explanatory text that accompanies each policy. While the explanatory text may be advisory as to how activities can show consistency with the LWRP policies, the State may not use the explanatory text as a basis for issuing an objection under its CZMA authority. Please also note that for the review of federal actions pursuant to the CZMA, the requirements of the statute and implementing regulations at 15 CFR part 930 are controlling over any conflicting interpretation of the discussion of the CZMA federal consistency requirements within the Town of Marlborough LWRP. As a standard qualification applying to all program changes, states may not incorporate enforceable policies by reference. If an approved enforceable policy refers to another statute, regulation, policy, standard, guidance, or other such requirement or document, the referenced policy must be submitted to and approved by the Office for Coastal Management as an enforceable policy in order to be applied under the federal consistency review provisions of the CZMA. No referenced policy may be applied for CZMA federal consistency review purposes unless that policy has been separately reviewed and approved as an enforceable policy by the Office for Coastal Management. Thank you for your cooperation in this review. Please contact Nelle D’Aversa at (908) 399-7756, if you have any questions. For future correspondence regarding these program changes, please refer to the file number assigned to this action, NY-2021-1. Sincerely, Joelle Gore, Chief Stewardship Division Attachment: Table of Approved Changes (NY-2021-1) TABLE OF APPROVED CHANGES TO THE NEW YORK COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (NY-2021-1) Please reference the Office for Coastal Management May 25, 2021, decision letter for clarifications, exceptions, and qualifications pertaining to this approval. Legal citation Title of policy, section, or other descriptor Is the change new, Date effective Enforceable Enforceable mechanism revised, or deleted in state policy citation Not applicable Town of Marlborough Local Waterfront New 11/12/2020 Yes Executive Law, Article 42 Revitalization Program (LWRP) (Section III only) pg. 1 Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement Introduction and Orientation to the Documents. These documents represent a coordinated effort by the Town of Marlborough to create and adopt a local waterfront revitalization program (LWRP) and to prepare and adopt an update to the town’s comprehensive plan. The LWRP also includes a harbor management plan. To implement the LWRP and the harbor management plan contained herein the town has also drafted a local law to ensure future actions taken by agencies of the town are consistent with the waterfront revitalization policies. A harbor management local law has also been prepared to regulate the use of waters within the town in conformance with the LWRP including the harbor management plan. This report also functions as the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for review of the LWRP, comprehensive plan, the waterfront consistency review law and the harbor management law for the purposes of compliance with the regulations for State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) at 6NYCRR Part 617. This DGEIS and associated process is to provide the Town of Marlborough Town Board as lead agencies, involved and interested agencies, and the public with an understanding of, and the opportunity to provide comment on, the potential environmental impacts that may result from the proposed actions. The elements required for an environmental impact statement can be found in the documents embodied herein as follows: 1. Cover Sheet Inside Cover Page 2. Table of Contents Preface to this LWRP Document 3. Summary LWRP Appendix G 4. Description of the Proposed Action LWRP Appendix G 5. Environmental Setting Section II: Inventory and Analysis of this LWRP and the Comprehensive Plan (adopted) attached as Appendix B 6. Impacts and Mitigation LWRP Appendix G 7. Alternatives LWRP Appendix G 8. Harbor Management Law LWRP Appendix F 9. Waterfront Consistency Review Law LWRP Appendix E 10. Comprehensive Plan Appendix B Town of Marlborough Town Board Alphonso Lanzetta, Town Supervisor Howard Baker Scott Corcoran Allan Koenig Ed Molinelli Advisory Committee Members Howard Baker John Demarco CJ Hartwell-Kelly Chip Kent Vivian Lanzarone Alphonso Lanzetta Cindy Lanzetta Rosemary Wein A special thanks and acknowledgements to all individuals, groups and organizations that helped with, and contributed to the development of this plan. Additional Thanks to James Garofalo, Matt Kierstead, and Daniel Pinnavaia. Cover Photos by Rick Lashinsky courtesy of Meet Me in Marlborough This report was prepared with funding provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Community Planning Process ........................................................................................... 2 Previous Plans ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Stewart Sbts 0207D 10169.Pdf
    Copyright © 2013 Joe Randell Stewart All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. THE INFLUENCE OF NEWBIGIN’S MISSIOLOGY ON SELECTED INNOVATORS AND EARLY ADOPTERS OF THE EMERGING CHURCH PARADIGM ___________________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary ___________________ In Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Education ___________________ by Joe Randell Stewart December 2013 APPROVAL SHEET THE INFLUENCE OF NEWBIGIN’S MISSIOLOGY ON SELECTED INNOVATORS AND EARLY ADOPTERS OF THE EMERGING CHURCH PARADIGM Joe Randell Stewart Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Hal K. Pettegrew (Chair) __________________________________________ Timothy P. Jones Date ______________________________ I dedicate this dissertation to my loving wife, Nancy. I will always love you. Thanks for your constant encouragement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF TABLES . x LIST OF FIGURES . xi PREFACE . xii Chapter 1. RESEARCH CONCERN Introduction to the Research Problem . Newbigin’s Influence on the Innovators and Early Adopters Newbigin’s Influence on the Missiology of the Emerging Church The Scope of Newbigin’s Influence Selected Concepts of the Innovators and Early Adopters of the Emerging Church Paradigm . 22 The Pervasive Impact of Christendom . 24 Communal Dimensions of Witness: The Church as a Hermeneutic of the Gospel . .. 30 The Church as Sign, Instrument, and Foretaste . 33 Research Thesis . 40 Focus Statements . 40 Delimitations of the Study . 41 Terminology . 41 iv Chapter Page Research Assumptions . 51 Procedural Overview . 52 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ED278595.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 278 595 SO 017 879 AUTHOR Semonche, John E., Ed. TITLE Religion and Law in American History. Church,State and the First Amendment: A North Carolina Dialogue. INSTITUTION North Carolina Univ., Chapel Hill. SPONS AGENCY National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 85 NOTE 135p.; Prepared under the auspices of theProgram in the Humanities and Human Values. For related documents, see SO 017 880-881. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Churches; *Civil Liberties; Civil Rights; *Constitutional History; Government Role; *Religion; *Religious Differences; Religious Factors;State Church Separation; *lin,ted States History ABSTRACT This two-part anthology contains a series of background readings on church-state issues designed to provide primary materials through which North Carolinianscan better understand the religion clauses of the First Amendment.Part 1 gives historical and philosophical background in fourchapters: (1) "God's Country: Perception or Presumption?"; (2) "Near the Beginning:Should God's Realm Be Separated from Man's?"; (3) "The Rights _)fMan and Other Bases for Religious Liberty: A Practical Accommodationor a Moral Imperative?"; and (4) "The Constitutional Foundation:What Did the Religious Clauses Mean?" Part 2 describes the legalexperience in four chapters numbered sequentially from part 1:(5) "The Basic Cases: What Limits Do the Religion Clauses Place Upon the States?"; (6) "Free Exercise of Religion: How Much Room ShouldGovernment Allow?"; (7) "School Prayer and Financial Assistance:What Tends To Establish Religion?"; and (8) "Historical Exceptions:Does Custom Equal Constitutionality?" Each chapter contains readingsand questions for discussion. A list of suggestions foradditional reading is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Cement Industry at Rosendale, Ulster County, New York
    Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 4, No. 6 Paper ID JAI100672 Available online at www.astm.org Dietrich Werner1 and Kurtis C. Burmeister2 An Overview of the History and Economic Geology of the Natural Cement Industry at Rosendale, Ulster County, New York ABSTRACT: The Rosendale region of southeastern New York State is widely recognized as the source of the highest quality natural cement in North America. The North American natural cement industry was founded in 1819 by Canvass White in central New York, but soon shifted to Rosendale where it flourished for over 150 years. By the end of the 19th century, the superior quality of Rosen- dale cement was known worldwide and was actively used in the construction of some of America’s most enduring landmarks. Rosendale natural cement’s reputation stems from the unique composi- tion of the clay-rich layers of dolostone in the Upper Silurian Rondout Formation from which it is manufactured. Miners utilized room-and-pillar techniques to extract this dolostone from strongly deformed strata in the Rosendale region, creating unique bedrock exposures in mines that are something of an engineering marvel. The exposures resulting from these mining activities have long attracted the attention of geologists for research and education. Production of natural cement trans- formed extracted dolostone into barrels of cement through a labor-intensive process involving calci- nation in kilns, cracking, and grinding. Barrels of cement produced were quickly shipped at competi- tive prices via the Delaware and Hudson Canal, which directly connected the Rosendale natural cement region to major shipping avenues. KEYWORDS: natural cement, Canvass White, Delaware and Hudson canal, cement production, geology, education, Rosendale, Ulster County, New York Introduction The momentum of the North American Industrial Revolution in the opening years of the 19th century sparked a number of large-scale building projects, including the construction of regional canal net- works.
    [Show full text]
  • A Long-Term Prehistoric Occupation in the Hudson Valley
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Spring 4-23-2018 The Roscoe Perry House Site: A Long-Term Prehistoric Occupation in the Hudson Valley Dylan C. Lewis CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/339 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Roscoe Perry House Site: A Long-Term Prehistoric Occupation in the Hudson Valley by Dylan C. F. Lewis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Hunter College The City University of New York 2018 Thesis Sponsor: April 23, 2018 Dr. William J Parry Date Signature April 23, 2018 Dr. Joseph Diamond Date Signature of Second Reader Acknowledgments: I would like to thank Dr. Joseph Diamond for providing me with a well excavated and informative archaeological collection from the SUNY New Paltz Collection. Without which I would have been unable to conduct research in the Hudson Valley. I would like to thank Dr. William Parry for so generously taking me on as a graduate student. His expertise in lithics has been invaluable. Thank you Glen Kolyer for centering me and helping me sort through the chaos of a large collection. Frank Spada generously gave his time to help sort through the debitage. Lastly, I would like to thank my wife to be for supporting me through the entire process.
    [Show full text]
  • Endowments and Funds As of June 30, 2010
    2009-2010 Contributors E ND O W M E N TS A ND FUNDS Many donors choose to establish named endowments or funds, which provide critical support for productions and projects in general or specific program areas. They also offer special recognition opportunities. The following is a list of named endowments and funds as of June 30, 2010. The Vincent Astor Endowment for Literacy Programming The Arlene and Milton D. Berkman Philanthropic Fund Lillian and H. Huber Boscowitz Arts and Humanities Endowment The Aron Bromberg / Abe Raskin Partners Fund Irving Caesar Lifetime Trust for Music Programming The Joanne Toor Cummings Endowment for Children’s Programming FJC – A Foundation of Philanthropic Funds The Rita and Herbert Z. Gold Fund for Children’s Programming The Lillian Goldman Programming Endowment The M.J. Harrison/Rutgers University Broadcast Fellowship Program The Robert and Harriet Heilbrunn Programming Endowment The JLS/RAS Foundation Endowed Income Fund The John Daghlian Kazanjian Endowment The Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Arts Fund The Bernard Kiefson Endowment for Nature Programming The Reginald F. Lewis Endowment for Minority Fellowship Programs The Frits and Rita Markus Endowment for Science and Nature Programming The Abby R. Mauzé Endowment Fund for Arts and Humanities Programming The George Leonard Mitchell Fund The Henry and Lucy Moses Endowment for Children’s Programming The Abby and George O’Neill Program Endowment Fund The George Page Endowment for Science and Nature Programming The Dr. Edward A. Raymond Endowment for Science and Nature Programming Dr. Helen Rehr Endowment for Education and Outreach Blanchette Hooker Rockefeller Fund Endowment for Humanities Programming May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Minority Fellowship Program The Dorothy Schiff Endowment for News and Public Affairs Programming The Hubert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook: American Revolution
    Guidebook: American Revolution UPPER HUDSON Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site http://nysparks.state.ny.us/sites/info.asp?siteId=3 5181 Route 67 Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 Hours: May-Labor Day, daily 10 AM-7 PM Labor Day-Veterans Day weekends only, 10 AM-7 PM Memorial Day- Columbus Day, 1-4 p.m on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday Phone: (518) 279-1155 (Special Collections of Bailey/Howe Library at Uni Historical Description: Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site is the location of a Revolutionary War battle between the British forces of Colonel Friedrich Baum and Lieutenant Colonel Henrick von Breymann—800 Brunswickers, Canadians, Tories, British regulars, and Native Americans--against American militiamen from Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire under Brigadier General John Stark (1,500 men) and Colonel Seth Warner (330 men). This battle was fought on August 16, 1777, in a British effort to capture American storehouses in Bennington to restock their depleting provisions. Baum had entrenched his men at the bridge across the Walloomsac River, Dragoon Redoubt, and Tory Fort, which Stark successfully attacked. Colonel Warner's Vermont militia arrived in time to assist Stark's reconstituted force in repelling Breymann's relief column of some 600 men. The British forces had underestimated the strength of their enemy and failed to get the supplies they had sought, weakening General John Burgoyne's army at Saratoga. Baum and over 200 men died and 700 men surrendered. The Americans lost 30 killed and forty wounded The Site: Hessian Hill offers picturesque views and interpretative signs about the battle. Directions: Take Route 7 east to Route 22, then take Route 22 north to Route 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #76, November 2011
    Issue 76 HRVI November Newsletter November 2011 HRVI Interiew: David conduct the events the south in New York City, Osbourne, Curator of St church hosts and manage and the American forces Paul’s Church the five-acre cemetery. up near you Q: Can you explain a lit- [Poughkeepsie]. I recently spoke to David tle bit about the battle of Q: What can you tell me Osbourne, the museum cu- Pell’s Point? about your welcome rator, and manager of St. center exhibition? Paul’s church in Westches- A: In October 18, 1776, ter, New York about some very near by [St. Paul’s A: Well there are two of its featured exhibits, as Church] a small Ameri- exhibitions, which are well as other relevant about can brigade attacked a also featured on our the Hudson Valley. Any- British army after the website. One is ‘A Clash one interested in visiting troops landed in of Cultures’ exhibit on the national historic land- Westchester. While the Anne Hutchinson, who mark should go to their main body of the Ameri- moved to the area seek- website. can forces was retreating, ing religious tolerance this small brigade en- after being exiled from Q: Hello Mr. Osbourne. gaged in the military tac- Massachusetts. The ex- Can you explain your role tic of ‘rear guard action’ hibit examines how the at St. Paul’s Church. against the large British Dutch settlers, the Al- A:I am the site manager, force. Pell’s Point is sig- gonquin natives, and responsible for preserva- nificant because how [her] followers tion of its resources, as Westchester was largely lived together in the ar- well as the church itself.
    [Show full text]
  • T,' H".I,Mt.I-Ii'.N Ij .'J~:I¡;'Ii ,@
    ~~~ T,' H".I,mT.I-Ii'.N ij .'j~:i¡;'ii ,@ (i; ~~~ T. ¡'"H." "l,m.T. ..'......E...~ rN' WLIW:~ì. ; i\ 'j; v NET.ORG is a House of Ideas. A luminous destination in the media landscape. From the streets and neighborhoods of New York City to the far reaches of AmericaJ this vibrant institution invites people to see in new ways, to be touched by creativity and inspiration, to revel in discovery and wonder. Built on a mission to educate, celebrate, innovateJ and inspire, this House of Ideas promotes a vision of people more deeply connected to the world around them. During 2008-09, WNET.ORG harnessed the highest potential of public media in pursuit of its mission. Through its array of broadcast and online outlets, it reported the news of the day. opened channels of dialogue on critical issues facing American citizensJ showcased the artists that define the pinnacle of cultural expression in our timeJ and made opportunities for lifelong learning available to all. All that WNET.ORG undertakes is made possible by the generous support of individuals and organizations that believe in our mission. In this reportJ we look back at some of the highlights from the House of Ideas during the year 2008-09. Here, we also recognize the vital contributions of those supporters who have empowered our unique vision. Thanks to their commitment, our mission-driven media continues to touch the minds and hearts of millions every day. z o ~INSPIRE -~ PEOPLE OF ALL AGES AND WALKS OF LIFE WITH MEDIA THAT IS , POWERFUL, RESONANT AND UNIQUE.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax OMB No
    ** PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY ** Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) 2018 Department of the Treasury | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Open to Public Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information. Inspection A For the 2018 calendar year, or tax year beginning JUL 1, 2018 and ending JUN 30, 2019 B Check if C Name of organization D Employer identification number applicable: Address change TRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC Name change Doing business as 56-1380796 Initial return Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Final return/ PO BOX 12729 919-474-8370 termin- ated City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code G Gross receipts $ 233,310,033. Amended return DURHAM, NC 27709-2729 H(a) Is this a group return Applica- tion F Name and address of principal officer: LORI O'KEEFE for subordinates? ~~ Yes X No pending SAME AS C ABOVE H(b) Are all subordinates included? Yes No I Tax-exempt status: X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( )§(insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 If "No," attach a list. (see instructions) J Website: | WWW.TRIANGLECF.ORG H(c) Group exemption number | K Form of organization: X Corporation Trust Association Other | L Year of formation: 1983 M State of legal domicile: NC Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: SEE SCHEDULE O 2 Check this box | if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Flight / New York State Ornithological Association Annual Conference Hosted by the Catskill Center Kingston, NY September 13‐15, 2019
    Taking Flight / New York State Ornithological Association Annual Conference Hosted by the Catskill Center Kingston, NY September 13‐15, 2019 Two ways to register: 1) Register and Pay with credit card online at: www.catskillcenter.org/takingflight/registration 2) Mail this completed form and payment: Catskill Center, c/o Katie Palm, PO Box 504, Arkville, NY Registrant #1 Name ____________________________________________________________________ Address________________________________ City___________________State________ Zip________ Phone(______)__________________________ Email_________________________________________ Delegate? Yes ______ No ______ Name of Club_____________________________________________ Registrant #2 Name ____________________________________________________________________ Address________________________________ City___________________State________ Zip________ Phone(______)__________________________ Email_________________________________________ Delegate? Yes ______ No ______ Name of Club_____________________________________________ Per Qty Person Total Registration postmarked by $55 August 2, 2019 Mail completed form and Registration postmarked after payment to: $65 August 2, 2019 Catskill Center Student registration fee $35 C/O Katie Palm PO Box 504 Saturday evening Banquet‐ buffet** $55 Arkville, NY 12406 Friday evening Hudson River Birding [email protected] $40 Cruise (845) 586‐2611 Snack for Saturday morning hike (fruit, $10 drink, granola bar, hiking snacks) ** * Checks payable to: Snack for Sunday morning
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Dix Mountain
    FREE! COVERING SEPTEMBER UPSTATE NY 2016 SINCE 2000 Hiking Dix Mountain CONTENTS A Scenic Trail with 1 Hiking & Backpacking Dix Mountain Expansive Lookouts 3 Running & Walking By Bill Ingersoll Leaves, Pumpkins & ▲ HIKERS REACHING THE DIX his trail is arguably the most scenic approach to Dix By all means, make the short SUMMIT ARE REWARDED WITH Fall Classics THIS PERFECT VIEW OF GOTHICS. Mountain, the sixth highest peak in the High Peaks. Although side trip if you have the time. BILL INGERSOLL 5 News Briefs T it is nearly seven miles long, there are several attractive If you are planning to linger, landmarks to enjoy along the way: Round Pond, the North Fork 5 From the Publisher & Editor note that Round Pond has been stocked with brook trout. Boquet and its lean-to, and the brief traverse of Dix’s northern The main trail bears right at the junction and circles through 6-9 CALENDAR OF EVENTS slide. Although Bob Marshall and other hikers in the 1920s found the birch forest to Round’s northern shore. Of all the Round September to cause for complaint in the condition of the trail after the twin fires Ponds in the Adirondack Park, this is one of the few in which November Events of 1903 and 1913, many of those sins have been erased by the pas- the name is almost geometrically appropriate. The trail passes sage of time. The one fault that remains is the steepness that exists close around the shore, with numerous opportunities to enjoy 11 Bicycling on the uppermost portion of the trail, above the slide.
    [Show full text]
  • John Burroughs Black Creek Trail Plan
    N Eltings Rd d R rs e n r o C LILLY s LAKE ley aw 15 H Tony WIlliams Swartekill Rd 16 B la ck Town Park Loughran Ln C re e k Martin Ave d R e d i s r P e O U v Chodikee Lake S i S R E Illinois S Boat Launch Chodik e R Mountain 12 N ee Lak d New Paltz Rd d CHODIKEE t R er J LAKE k Blacka Creek Canoe c n A e Valli Rd d H W y Berean &o Kayak Launch H o o le l d l i d i k F d R Pa k Park d e e Black Creek John Burroughs 44 N e d R R i Nature Sactuary e v State Forest k k e r a s i i L S Chodikee d B e Rd Gordon Highland O Y 299 L L D Property 44 Black Creek 9W S Burroughs Dr 9W Preserve Franny Reese State Park Walkway Over HUDSON RIVER the Hudson 9 Y D E 9 9 H 40A P A R K 41 BlackBlack CreekCreek TrailTrail Plan Bike | Paddle | Hike Black Creek Trail Table of Contents Sections Maps & Graphics 1| Introduction 7 Trail Concept 6-7 1.1| Executive Summary 8 1.2| Conserved Lands 11 Conserved Lands 10 2| Existing Conditions 13 Conserved Lands 12-13 2.1| Access & Connections 15 Issues 15 2.2| Trail Conditions 16 2.3| Educational Programing 17 2.4| Corridor Ecology 18 2.5| Economic Development 19 Potential Redevelopment Sites 19 2| Recommendations 21 Trail Route 20-21 3.1| Recommended Trail Route 23 Trail Route 23 3.1.1| Biking 24 Ose Road Crossing & BCSF Entrance 24 3.1.2| Paddling 25 3.1.3| Hiking 26 Hiking Trail Detail 27 3.2| Access Improvements 29 Trail Access 29 3.3| Wayfinding & Branding 30 3.4| Environmental Protection 31 3.5| Land Conservation 32 3.6| Educational Programing 33 3.7| Revitalize Properties 34 3.8| Develop Businesses 35 3.9|
    [Show full text]