DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1: Community Profile and Review of Past Plans January 30, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1: Community Profile and Review of Past Plans January 30, 2019 Town of Esopus Comprehensive Plan Appendix 1: Community Profile and Review of Past Plans January 30, 2019 (518) 458-7112 • [Page Intentional left blank] Town of Esopus Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents REVIEW OF PAST PLANS .........................................................................................................................................................1 COMMUNITY PROFILE ..........................................................................................................................................................10 Demographic and Growth Trends Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Housing and Marketing Trends....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Education ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Civic and Community Organizations .............................................................................................................................................................. 26 Arts,Culture, and Historic Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 29 Community Facilities and Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................................ 34 Parks and Recreation ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Economic Vitality ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Environmental Resources ............................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Land Use and Zoning ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 79 LIST OF TABLES: Table 1: Historic and Projection Population ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 2: Population Trend Comparison .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 3: Projected Percent Change in Population by Age Cohort, 2017-2022 ............................................................................................... 13 Table 4: Median Age (2000-2022) .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Table 5: Household by Type and Size (2010) ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 6: Average Household Size ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Table 7: Median Household Income ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 8: Town of Esopus Household Income (2016) ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 9: General Housing Characteristics (2012-2016) .................................................................................................................................. 19 Table 10: Housing Units by Units in Structure (2012-2016) .......................................................................................................................... 20 Table 11: Housing Unit by Year Built ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 Table 12: Residential Building Permit Activity (2006-2016) ......................................................................................................................... 22 Table 13: Value of Owner-Occupied Housing Units (2016) .......................................................................................................................... 22 Table 14: Gross Rent Paid (2016) ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Table 15: Educational Attainment, Population Age 25 and Under ................................................................................................................. 26 Table 16: Where Town of Esopus Residents Work ........................................................................................................................................ 60 Table of Contents Page i Town of Esopus Comprehensive Plan Table 17: Industries in Which Esopus Residents Are Employed ................................................................................................................... 61 Table 18: Climate Projection for the Hudson Valley Region ......................................................................................................................... 77 Table 19: Land Use Breakdown...................................................................................................................................................................... 81 Table 20: Wholly Exempted Property Values 2018 ....................................................................................................................................... 85 LIST OF FIGURES: Figure 1: Population by Age Cohort, 2017 ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2: Town of Esopus Potential Environmental Justice Area .................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 3: Employment by Super-Sector, Ulster County, 2016 ....................................................................................................................... 57 LIST OF MAPS (Located at the end of the document) Community Services Map Parks and Recreation Map Environmental Resources Map Land Use Map Existing Zoning Map Cover Page Photo Credit: Scenic Hudson Table of Contents Page ii Town of Esopus Comprehensive Plan REVIEW OF PAST PLANS The Town of Esopus’ prior Comprehensive Plan dates back to 1994. In addition to the 1994 Plan, several additional plans and studies have been conducted aimed at revitalizing hamlets, improving transportation networks, preserving the natural setting, and enhancing economic growth. This 2019 Comprehensive Plan builds upon those previous plans, which include: • Town of Esopus Master Plan Update-1991 • Town of Esopus Comprehensive Plan-1994 • Town of Esopus Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP)-1987 and the 2014 New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) Monitoring Report • Port Ewen Street Interconnection Plan-2006 • Ulster County Main Streets: A Regional Approach: Port Ewen and Milton Case Studies-2011 • Tidal Rondout Creek Watershed Management Plan-2015 • Town of Esopus Scenic Resources Inventory Study-2016 • Hudson River Estuary Program-Restoration of Watershed Connectivity Study-2017 • John Burroughs-Black Creek Trail Plan-2017 TOWN OF ESOPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE (1991) The 1991 Town of Esopus Master Plan Update worked off the 1970 Town Comprehensive Development Plan, as well as the 1987 Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. The document studies the changes in the 20 years which elapsed since the first 1970 plan and sets a course for the future, seeking a better representativeness of the Town at the time, in 1990. The document explains unrealized population growth, declining importance of large scale agriculture and industry, reduced importance of Kingston as a regional commerce center. The Plan was crafted using a questionnaire, which would later be used to complete and adopted, subsequent plan in 1994. Within the Plan Update, policy recommendations were made, which would later be utilized in the completion of the 1994 Town of Esopus Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, and also later incorporated into the 1994 Plan, future land uses were proposed and densities were discussed as well as future commercial and industrial uses, and open space and recreation needs and locations. Furthermore the plan discusses transportation needs, improvements and connections that should be implemented due to cancellation of the realignment of US Rt. 9W and development patterns at the time. Lastly in regard to recommendations, the Plan discusses Community Facilities and vital infrastructure needs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Cement Industry at Rosendale, Ulster County, New York
    Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 4, No. 6 Paper ID JAI100672 Available online at www.astm.org Dietrich Werner1 and Kurtis C. Burmeister2 An Overview of the History and Economic Geology of the Natural Cement Industry at Rosendale, Ulster County, New York ABSTRACT: The Rosendale region of southeastern New York State is widely recognized as the source of the highest quality natural cement in North America. The North American natural cement industry was founded in 1819 by Canvass White in central New York, but soon shifted to Rosendale where it flourished for over 150 years. By the end of the 19th century, the superior quality of Rosen- dale cement was known worldwide and was actively used in the construction of some of America’s most enduring landmarks. Rosendale natural cement’s reputation stems from the unique composi- tion of the clay-rich layers of dolostone in the Upper Silurian Rondout Formation from which it is manufactured. Miners utilized room-and-pillar techniques to extract this dolostone from strongly deformed strata in the Rosendale region, creating unique bedrock exposures in mines that are something of an engineering marvel. The exposures resulting from these mining activities have long attracted the attention of geologists for research and education. Production of natural cement trans- formed extracted dolostone into barrels of cement through a labor-intensive process involving calci- nation in kilns, cracking, and grinding. Barrels of cement produced were quickly shipped at competi- tive prices via the Delaware and Hudson Canal, which directly connected the Rosendale natural cement region to major shipping avenues. KEYWORDS: natural cement, Canvass White, Delaware and Hudson canal, cement production, geology, education, Rosendale, Ulster County, New York Introduction The momentum of the North American Industrial Revolution in the opening years of the 19th century sparked a number of large-scale building projects, including the construction of regional canal net- works.
    [Show full text]
  • A Long-Term Prehistoric Occupation in the Hudson Valley
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Spring 4-23-2018 The Roscoe Perry House Site: A Long-Term Prehistoric Occupation in the Hudson Valley Dylan C. Lewis CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/339 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Roscoe Perry House Site: A Long-Term Prehistoric Occupation in the Hudson Valley by Dylan C. F. Lewis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Hunter College The City University of New York 2018 Thesis Sponsor: April 23, 2018 Dr. William J Parry Date Signature April 23, 2018 Dr. Joseph Diamond Date Signature of Second Reader Acknowledgments: I would like to thank Dr. Joseph Diamond for providing me with a well excavated and informative archaeological collection from the SUNY New Paltz Collection. Without which I would have been unable to conduct research in the Hudson Valley. I would like to thank Dr. William Parry for so generously taking me on as a graduate student. His expertise in lithics has been invaluable. Thank you Glen Kolyer for centering me and helping me sort through the chaos of a large collection. Frank Spada generously gave his time to help sort through the debitage. Lastly, I would like to thank my wife to be for supporting me through the entire process.
    [Show full text]
  • Erie Canalway Map & Guide
    National Park Service Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor U.S. Department of the Interior Erie Canalway Map & Guide Pittsford, Frank Forte Pittsford, The New York State Canal System—which includes the Erie, Champlain, Cayuga-Seneca, and Oswego Canals—is the centerpiece of the Erie Canalway National Heritage Corridor. Experience the enduring legacy of this National Historic Landmark by boat, bike, car, or on foot. Discover New York’s Dubbed the “Mother of Cities” the canal fueled the growth of industries, opened the nation to settlement, and made New York the Empire State. (Clinton Square, Syracuse, 1905, courtesy Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Detroit Publishing Extraordinary Canals Company Collection.) pened in 1825, New York’s canals are a waterway link from the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes through the heart of upstate New York. Through wars and peacetime, prosperity and This guide presents exciting Orecession, flood and drought, this exceptional waterway has provided a living connection things to do, places to go, to a proud past and a vibrant future. Built with leadership, ingenuity, determination, and hard work, and exceptional activities to the canals continue to remind us of the qualities that make our state and nation great. They offer us enjoy. Welcome! inspiration to weather storms and time-tested knowledge that we will prevail. Come to New York’s canals this year. Touch the building stones CONTENTS laid by immigrants and farmers 200 years ago. See century-old locks, lift Canals and COVID-19 bridges, and movable dams constructed during the canal’s 20th century Enjoy Boats and Boating Please refer to current guidelines and enlargement and still in use today.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl Count 2020
    New York State January Waterfowl Count Report – 2020 The Ulster County segment of the annual NYSOA New York State January Waterfowl Count was conducted on January 18, 2020. Twenty participants in eight field parties encountered a remarkable 21 species and 10,012 individual waterfowl, surpassing our previous high count of 17 species recorded in 2016, 2013, and 2008. Our ten-year average for this countywide effort is 11.8 species and 6,225 individuals. Typical for this annual mid-winter survey, two species accounted for 94% of our total abundance, Canada Goose (82%) and Mallard (12%). A total of 16 Bald Eagles (9 adults and 7 sub- adults) were observed during the course of the waterfowl count. Extensive open water, exposed fields, and extremely mild air temperatures less than a week prior to the count encouraged a noticeable movement of waterfowl into the mid-Hudson River region, with air temperatures reaching the upper 60’s (F) on two consecutive days over the previous weekend. Cold arctic air eventually moved into our area mid-week and remained in place, freezing smaller and slower- moving bodies of water. This sudden change induced some waterfowl to congregate in significant areas of open water on creeks, rivers, and reservoirs, and an exceptionally good diversity of waterfowl remained in the county for count day. The highlight of this year’s survey was principally the magnitude of diversity encountered on a waterfowl count that typically tallies in the low teens. Although there was no particular outstanding species this year, Hooded Mergansers were found in record high numbers (35), surpassing our previous high count of 20, more than four times our ten-year average of 8.2/year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Waterfowl Count Report
    New York State Waterfowl Count – 2008 January 12, 2008 Ulster County Narrative Page 1 of 8 Sixteen observers in five field parties participated in the Ulster County segment of the annual New York State Winter Waterfowl Count, recording a total of 17 species and 6,890 individuals within the county on Saturday, 12 January 2008. This represents a record high species count, exceeding last year's diversity by three species, and is just 204 individuals short of our record high total set in 2006. Field observers noted fast moving water, and essentially frozen ponds, lakes, and marshes throughout the county. Stone Ridge Pond on Mill Dam Road was the exception, and continues to contribute a large number of individuals and a few unusual species to the composite, hosting American Wigeon, Ring-necked Duck, and 1,061 individuals this year. The Hudson River, Ashokan Reservoir, lower Esopus Creek in Saugerties, and agricultural fields surrounding Wallkill prison accounted for the majority of the balance of the count. Weather conditions were quite favorable for this time of the year, especially in comparison to the rain and wide- spread fog of last year, or the sub-freezing temperatures typical of a mid-January count. A very dense fog did persist over the Hudson River early morning, requiring some minor route changes to allow for early visits to inland sites while delaying surveys of the Hudson to later in the day. Temperatures started out just below freezing, then warmed to a very comfortable mid-40's (F) by afternoon. Winds were calm for the most part, with the exception of a cold NW gale sweeping across partially frozen Ashokan Reservoir, making for very choppy waters in the lower basin and difficult viewing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Montgomery Comprehensive Plan
    Village of Montgomery Comprehensive Plan Village of Montgomery Comprehensive Plan Village of Montgomery, NY Prepared by the Village of Montgomery Comprehensive Plan Committee With Planit Main Street, Inc. Draft Update March 17, 2017 Village of Montgomery, New York i Village of Montgomery Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements Village of Montgomery Board Hon. L. Stephen Brescia Mayor JoAnn Scheels, Deputy Mayor Darlene Andolsek, Trustee Michael R. Hembury, Trustee Walter Lindner, Trustee Comprehensive Plan Committee Kevin Conero, Chairman Darlene Andolsek Ken Blake Shane Daley Bill Freeman Sophia Romano JoAnn Scheels By far the Thomas Steed greatest and Charles Wallace* most admirable form of wisdom is that needed to Kevin Dowd, Village Attorney plan and beautify cities and human Consultants communities. - Socrates PLANIT MAIN STREET, INC. Alan J. Sorensen, AICP – Author All photos and illustrations unless noted otherwise © Planit Main Street, Inc., all rights reserved. This publication is produced for the sole use of the Village of Montgomery and may not be made available to other parties without the written permission of Planit Main Street, Inc. Three photos on the front cover were contributed by Donna Dolan Jacke [Orange Tractor, Wallkill River and BBQ]. *deceased Village of Montgomery, New York ii Village of Montgomery Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements Continued Village Staff Members and Volunteers Monserrate Stanley, Village Clerk Tina Murphy, Deputy Village Clerk Marion Wild, Village Historian Geographic Information Systems Mapping Geographic Information Systems (GIS) maps were prepared by Planit Main Street, Inc. except for the water resources maps that were prepared by staff members from the Orange County Planning Department. Funding The Hudson River Valley Greenway and Orange County Planning Department provided funding, in part, for the creation of this Comprehensive Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Te Cting the Sha W Angunks
    SHAWANGUNKS PROTECTING THE PROTECTING For people. wildlife. Forever. RIVER-TO-RIDGE TRAIL White Oak Bend Path Wallkill River The River-to-Ridge Trail was created in partnership by the Open Space Institute (OSI) and Mohonk Preserve, with the R2R support of the Butler Conservation RIVER-TO-RIDGE Fund. The trail traverses land conserved TRAIL by OSI and is intended for public use and enjoyment. This six-mile loop trail connects the Wallkill Valley Rail Trail/ Empire State Trail in the Village of New Paltz to the carriage roads and footpaths of the Shawangunk Ridge. Because the River-to-Ridge Trail runs along active farmland and is adjacent to private property, visitors are required to stay on the trail and respect the agricultural operations and neighboring properties. RULES OF THE TRAIL The River-to-Ridge Trail is open dawn to dusk, and admission is free to trail users. For your safety and enjoyment, we ask that trail users and guests help maintain the operation of this trail by following and helping others follow these simple rules. No Motorized Vehicles Clean Up After Pets No Camping Stay on Trail No Smoking No Hunting or Trapping No Dumping or Littering No Alcohol or Drugs No Firearms Leash Your Pets No Campfire No Drones Helmets Required for Cyclists ABOUT THE OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE The Open Space Institute (OSI) protects Committed to protecting the 50-mile scenic, natural and historic landscapes Shawangunk Ridge and improving public to provide public enjoyment, conserve access to protected lands, OSI is also habitat and working lands, and sustain supporting the creation of a local rail trail communities from Canada to Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge At the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge, we conserve the biological diversity of the Wallkill Valley by protecting and managing land, with a special emphasis on s% i 7 7 7* 7 migrating wate / fo wl, wintering raptors, and endangered species, while providing \ opportunities for scientific research J *tind compatible I public use. ' Our Mission Congress established the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge in 1990 "to preserve and enhance refuge lands and waters in a manner that will conserve the natural diversity of fish, wildlife, plants, This blue goose, and their habitats for present and designed by J.N. future generations and to provide "Ding" Darling, opportunities for compatible has become the scientific research, environmental symbol of the education, and fish and wildlife- National Wildlife oriented recreation." Congress Refuge System. /. also required the protection of •/. aquatic habitats within the refuge, •- including the Wallkill River and '53 Papakating Creek. - The individual purposes of this Wallkill River refuge are supported by the mission in fall The refuge is located along a nine-mile of the National Wildlife Refuge stretch of the Wallkill River, and lies in System, of which the Wallkill River a rolling valley within the Appalachian refuge is a part. That mission is Ridge and Valley physiographic "to administer a national network province. The Wallkill Valley is of lands and waters for the bounded by the Kittatinny Ridge to conservation, management, and the west and the New York/New where appropriate, restoration of Jersey Highlands to the east. This the fish, wildlife, and plant resources area is part of the Great Valley, which and their habitats within the United extends from Canada to the southern States for the benefit of present and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This Blue Goose, Designed by J.N
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fi sh, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service manages the 97-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 548 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 69 national fi sh hatcheries and 81 ecological services fi eld stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally signifi cant fi sheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fi shing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffi ng increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 Submitted by: Edward Henry Date Refuge Manager Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Concurrence by: Janet M.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Corps of Engineers Response Document Draft
    3.0 ORANGE COUNTY Orange County has experienced numerous water resource problems along the main stem and the associated tributaries of the Moodna Creek and the Ramapo River that are typically affected by flooding during heavy rain events over the past several years including streambank erosion, agradation, sedimentation, deposition, blockages, environmental degradation, water quality and especially flooding. However, since October 2005, the flooding issues have severely increased and flooding continues during storm events that may or may not be considered significant. Areas affected as a result of creek flows are documented in the attached trip reports (Appendix D). Throughout the Orange County watershed, site visits confirmed opportunities to stabilize the eroding or threatened banks restore the riparian habitat while controlling sediment transport and improving water quality, and balance the flow regime. If the local municipalities choose to request Federal involvement, there are several options, depending on their budget, desired timeframe and intended results. The most viable options include a specifically authorized watershed study or program, or an emergency streambank protection project (Section 14 of the Continuing Authorities Program), or pursing a Continuing Authorities Program study for Flood Risk Management or Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 205 and Section 206 of the Continuing Authorities Program, respectively). Limited Federal involvement could also be provided in the form of the Planning Assistance to States or Support for Others programs provide assistance and limited funds outside of traditional Corps authorities. A watershed study focusing on restoration of the Moodna Creek, Otter Creek, Ramapo River and their associated tributaries could address various problems using a systematic approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Acipenser Brevirostrum
    AR-405 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF SHORTNOSE STURGEON Acipenser brevirostrum Prepared by the Shortnose Sturgeon Status Review Team for the National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration November 1, 2010 Acknowledgements i The biological review of shortnose sturgeon was conducted by a team of scientists from state and Federal natural resource agencies that manage and conduct research on shortnose sturgeon along their range of the United States east coast. This review was dependent on the expertise of this status review team and from information obtained from scientific literature and data provided by various other state and Federal agencies and individuals. In addition to the biologists who contributed to this report (noted below), the Shortnose Stugeon Status Review Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of Mary Colligan, Julie Crocker, Michael Dadswell, Kim Damon-Randall, Michael Erwin, Amanda Frick, Jeff Guyon, Robert Hoffman, Kristen Koyama, Christine Lipsky, Sarah Laporte, Sean McDermott, Steve Mierzykowski, Wesley Patrick, Pat Scida, Tim Sheehan, and Mary Tshikaya. The Status Review Team would also like to thank the peer reviewers, Dr. Mark Bain, Dr. Matthew Litvak, Dr. David Secor, and Dr. John Waldman for their helpful comments and suggestions. Finally, the SRT is indebted to Jessica Pruden who greatly assisted the team in finding the energy to finalize the review – her continued support and encouragement was invaluable. Due to some of the similarities between shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon life history strategies, this document includes text that was taken directly from the 2007 Atlantic Sturgeon Status Review Report (ASSRT 2007), with consent from the authors, to expedite the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • How's the Water in the Catskill, Esopus and Rondout Creeks?
    How’s the Water in the Catskill, Esopus and Rondout Creeks? Cizen Science Fecal Contaminaon Study How’s the Water in the Catskill, Esopus and Rondout Creeks? Background & Problem Methods Results: 2012-2013 Potenal Polluon Sources © Riverkeeper 2014 © Riverkeeper 2014 Photo: Rob Friedman “SWIMMABILITY” FECAL PATHOGEN CONTAMINATION LOAD © Riverkeeper 2014 Government Pathogen Tesng © Riverkeeper 2014 Riverkeeper’s Fecal Contaminaon Study 2006 - Present Enterococcus (“Entero”) EPA-recommended fecal indicator Monthly sampling: May – Oct EPA Guideline for Primary Contact: Acceptable: 0-60 Entero per 100 mL Beach Advisory: >60 Entero per 100 mL © Riverkeeper 2014 Science Partners & Supporters Funders Science Partners • HSBC • Dr. Gregory O’Mullan Queens • Clinton Global Iniave College, City University of New • The Eppley Foundaon for York Research • Dr. Andrew Juhl, Lamont- • The Dextra Baldwin Doherty Earth Observatory, McGonagle Foundaon, Inc. Columbia University • The Hudson River Foundaon for Science and Environmental Research, Inc. • Hudson River Estuary Program, NYS DEC • New England Interstate Water Polluon Control Commission (2008-2013) © Riverkeeper 2014 Riverkeeper’s Cizen Science Program Goals 1. Fill a data gap 2. Raise awareness about fecal contaminaon in tributaries 3. Involve local residents in finding and eliminang Photo: John Gephards sources of contaminaon © Riverkeeper 2014 Riverkeeper’s Cizen Science Studies Tributaries sampled: • Catskill Creek • 45 river miles • 19 sites (many added in 2014) • Esopus Creek • 25 river miles
    [Show full text]