Completed and Future Projects on the Cheat River and Use of Tmdl Trading

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Completed and Future Projects on the Cheat River and Use of Tmdl Trading COMPLETED AND FUTURE PROJECTS ON THE CHEAT RIVER AND USE OF TMDL TRADING Paul F. Ziemkiewicz and Jennifer S. Simmons ABSTRACT The NMLRC works with federal and state agencies and watershed groups, to implement passive treatment methods to remediate watersheds damaged by AMD. In the Cheat Watershed the NMLRC works with the River of Promise, a volunteer group dedicated to restoring the ecological health of the Cheat River. To date, NMLRC has been involved in the construction of 4 passive treatment systems in the Cheat River watershed and, in cooperation with the Friends of the Cheat (FOC), has proposed the installation of 7 additional systems in the watershed before September 2004. These systems, along with large scale AMD treatment systems proposed by WV DEP Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and US Corps of Engineers for Pringle Run and Lick Run, will remove hundreds on tons of acid from the Cheat River every year. CHEAT RIVER WATERSHED In 1995 the National Mine Land Reclamation Center joined together with Friends of the Cheat, West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection, US Office of Surface Mining, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources and several other public and private organizations to form the River of Promise. The River of Promise is a collaborated effort by academia, industries, government agencies and citizens groups to address acid mine drainage problems in the Cheat River Watershed. Some state agencies estimate that approximately 200 miles of streams in the Cheat River Watershed have been impacted by acid mine drainage. Most of those miles are within the Preston County portion of the watershed. The largest contributors of acid load to the Cheat River are the streams within the Big Sandy Creek, Greens Run, Pringle Run, Lick Run, Heather Run, Muddy Creek watersheds. Several passive treatment systems have been installed in the Big Sandy, Sovern Run and Greens Run watersheds since the formation of the River of Promise in 1995. Passive systems at Big Bear Lake and McCarty Highwall in the Beaver Creek, a sub watershed of Big Sandy Creek, have significantly influenced water quality in the mainstem of Beaver Creek to the point that many native fish species are thriving. In addition, large-scale AMD treatment systems are being proposed by WV DEP Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and US Corps of Engineers for Pringle Run and Lick Run. COMPLETED PROJECTS Big Bear Lake Big Bear Lake is a 35-acre recreational lake located near Hazelton in Northeastern Preston County, West Virginia. Although the area was never mined, the lake receives acid water from natural bogs and local, acid forming rock. This increases acidity and reduces pH of nearby streams, which serve as the headwaters for Big Bear Lake and, subsequently, Beaver Creek. Prior to construction, the pH of the lake was about 4, however it was only moderately acidic (20 mg/L) and contained little to no metals. In spring of 1999 a 100-ft open limestone channel (OLC) was constructed between the two ponds above the main lake. In addition, a limestone leach bed (LS Bed) was constructed downstream of the swimming pond. The leach bed was constructed using 1500 tons of limestone and receives water from the swimming pond through a pipe. During high flow periods water also exits the swimming pond through two large culverts, which run underneath the dam road. In September 2000 a second OLC was constructed parallel to the LS Bed to treat this overflow water. A second, smaller limestone leach bed was also constructed in September 2000 above the Top Pond to boast the alkalinity of water entering subsequent systems. Although, there have been some seasonal variations in the data due to high flows associated with winter and spring snow melt, on average the site has continued to discharge net alkaline water into the headwaters of Beaver Creek. Currently the pH of water discharging the lake is 4.6 and contains 2.2 mg/L of alkalinity. By the time this discharge reaches Mt Dale Church Rd, approximately 1 mile downstream, the pH has increased to 5.6 and remains net alkaline. McCarty Highwall The McCarty Highwall is an abandoned surface mine site located about 10 miles Southeast of Bruceton Mills in Preston County, West Virginia. Prior to construction at McCarty, water seeping out along an old spoil pile was flowing into a channel and mixing with a second spoil seep approximately 500 ft downstream. These two seeps form a small stream that flows south into Beaver Creek and eventually into the Cheat River. Along the way the stream picks up several other small AMD seeps. A 1997 reconnaissance study by the Corps of Engineers showed the first seep was moderately acidic with a pH of 4.1 and a net acidity of 27.5 mg/L. The second seep was similar with a pH of 3.9 and 24.5 mg/L acidity. In October 2000, a series of open limestone channels (OLCs) and steel slag leach beds were installed downstream of seeps 1 and 2. The leach beds consisted of a settling basin and steel slag check dam. Both check dams were formed from approximately 150 tons of steel slag and rip rapped along the downstream side with 6-8 ” limestone rocks. A 200 ft open limestone channel (OLC #1) was constructed from the upper spoil seep to the edge of the first settling basin. A secondary OLC (OLC #1b) was constructed to the left of OLC #1 to carry AMD from an intermittent spoil seep to the first basin. Water leaches from the basin through the center of a steel slag check dam and enters a 300 ft open limestone channel (OLC #2). OLC #2 exits into the second settlement basin, along with water from a 100 ft open limestone channel (OLC #3) constructed at the seep 2 site. Water enters into settling basin #2 from OLCs #2 and #3 and exits the system through a second steel slag check dam and forms the headwaters of an unnamed tributary of Beaver Creek. Initial water samples collected from the leach beds contained extremely high concentrations of alkalinity (1479-1513 mg/L) and high pH values (11.6). However, by the fourth month, alkalinity had fallen to about 30 mg/L (pH 9.0). Since that time both pH values and alkalinity concentrations have appeared to stabilize between 20-30 mg/L. However, samples taken during the month of December show that SLB #2 was discharging net acid water (11 mg/L acidity) at a pH of 6.2. It is difficult to predict if this trend is due to the exhaustion of alkalinity from the slag or to high flow situations caused by snowmelt. Middle Fork of Greens Run The Greens Run watershed, in Central Preston, County, West Virginia is severely impacted by acid mine drainage (AMD). One of the primary acid sources to Greens Run occurs in the headwaters of the Middle Fork of Greens Run. Mining in this area has significantly altered surface topography and downstream water quality. An acidic pit lake and down slope spoil seep transport an average of 164.1 tons of acid per year to the Middle Fork of Greens Run. High alkaline steel slag and limestone were used to increase pH and alkalinity and decrease iron, aluminum and manganese concentrations of AMD discharging into the Middle Fork of Greens Run. Treatment was accomplished through the construction of: • a steel slag check dam and a freshwater leach bed within the pit lake, • steel slag and limestone lined channels from the pit lake to the sump, • a slag infiltration bed above the spoil seep, • a kisch slag basin at the spoil seep, • a settling pond, which receives treated water from the open limestone channel and kisch basin, and a limestone check dam downstream of the settling pond. Construction of the Middle Fork site was completed on 10/7/02. The initial post- construction sampling event was conducted on November 14, 2002. At this time, water downstream of the pit lake slag check dam was pH 10.5 and contained 41.3 mg/L of alkalinity. However, the pit lake had not yet begun discharging into the top of the OLC. Additionally, the kisch basin did not appear to be sufficiently neutralizing the acidity of the spoil seep discharge. In December, when the lake was sufficiently filled and discharging, it was discovered that, during construction, the top of the OLC was set above the top of the slag check dam. Therefore, the seep water was flooding the dam and flowing across the top of the lake and not through the slag check dam as originally designed. During this sampling event, water discharging the lake had a pH of 4.1 and was only slightly alkaline (0.6 mg/L). Therefore, since the kisch basin is not sufficiently neutralizing the acid seep downstream, the site continues to discharge net acid water. However, once the top of the channel is lowered to below the top of the slag check dam, water exiting the lake should have a higher alkaline load and be able to neutralize much of the acid entering the system downstream. PROPOSED PROJECTS Sovern Run # 62 Upgrade During the winter of 1997/98 a passive AMD treatment system was installed at the #62 site to treat acidic water discharging from an abandoned Freeport underground mine. Water was discharging from the mine through a collapsed portal approximately 100 ft above Sovern Run. This discharge had a pH of 3.2 and added nearly 748 mg/L of acid, 76.8 mg/L Fe, 98.1 mg/L Al and 11.1 mg/L of Mn into the mainstem of Sovern Run.
Recommended publications
  • 02070001 South Branch Potomac 01605500 South Branch Potomac River at Franklin, WV 01606000 N F South Br Potomac R at Cabins, WV 01606500 So
    Appendix D Active Stream Flow Gauging Stations In West Virginia Active Stream Flow Gauging Stations In West Virginia 02070001 South Branch Potomac 01605500 South Branch Potomac River At Franklin, WV 01606000 N F South Br Potomac R At Cabins, WV 01606500 So. Branch Potomac River Nr Petersburg, WV 01606900 South Mill Creek Near Mozer, WV 01607300 Brushy Fork Near Sugar Grove, WV 01607500 So Fk So Br Potomac R At Brandywine, WV 01608000 So Fk South Branch Potomac R Nr Moorefield, WV 01608070 South Branch Potomac River Near Moorefield, WV 01608500 South Branch Potomac River Near Springfield, WV 02070002 North Branch Potomac 01595200 Stony River Near Mount Storm,WV 01595800 North Branch Potomac River At Barnum, WV 01598500 North Branch Potomac River At Luke, Md 01600000 North Branch Potomac River At Pinto, Md 01604500 Patterson Creek Near Headsville, WV 01605002 Painter Run Near Fort Ashby, WV 02070003 Cacapon-Town 01610400 Waites Run Near Wardensville, WV 01611500 Cacapon River Near Great Cacapon, WV 02070004 Conococheague-Opequon 01613020 Unnamed Trib To Warm Spr Run Nr Berkeley Spr, WV 01614000 Back Creek Near Jones Springs, WV 01616500 Opequon Creek Near Martinsburg, WV 02070007 Shenandoah 01636500 Shenandoah River At Millville, WV 05020001 Tygart Valley 03050000 Tygart Valley River Near Dailey, WV 03050500 Tygart Valley River Near Elkins, WV 03051000 Tygart Valley River At Belington, WV 03052000 Middle Fork River At Audra, WV 03052450 Buckhannon R At Buckhannon, WV 03052500 Sand Run Near Buckhannon, WV 03053500 Buckhannon River At Hall, WV 03054500 Tygart Valley River At Philippi, WV Page D 1 of D 5 Active Stream Flow Gauging Stations In West Virginia 03055500 Tygart Lake Nr Grafton, WV 03056000 Tygart Valley R At Tygart Dam Nr Grafton, WV 03056250 Three Fork Creek Nr Grafton, WV 03057000 Tygart Valley River At Colfax, WV 05020002 West Fork 03057300 West Fork River At Walkersville, WV 03057900 Stonewall Jackson Lake Near Weston, WV 03058000 West Fork R Bl Stonewall Jackson Dam Nr Weston 03058020 West Fork River At Weston, WV 03058500 W.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Crayfishes of the Cheat River Watershed in West Virginia and Pennsylvania
    CRAYFISHES OF THE CHEAT RIVER WATERSHED IN WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA. PART II. OBSERVATIONS UPON ECOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATING TO DISTRIBUTION1 FRANK J. SCHWARTZ AND WILLIAM G. MEREDITH Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland and Ml. St. Mary's College, Emmittsburg, Maryland Schwartz and Meredith (1960) presented as Part I the localities and species of crayfishes (Decapoda) currently found throughout the Cheat River watershed of West Virginia and Pennsylvania. These records indicated that two species, Cambarus bartoni and Orconectes obscurus, now occupy the Cheat system. Litera- ture records occur for Cambarus bartoni carinirostris (Faxon, 1914; Ortmann, 1931) and Cambarus carolinus (Ortmann, 1931) in addition to the forms mentioned. Bick et al. (1953) have reviewed the meager literature relating to the ecology of acid mine streams. Bowden (1961) has called attention to the effects of strip mines on faunal ecologies. The former have also shown the detrimental effects to the fauna and ecology of a Louisiana acid stream after it was altered by channel dredging. A casual scanning of the data will reveal peculiarities in the distributions of the present species. C. bartoni, although taken at 138 stations of the 233 sampled (fig. 1), is absent today from the central portion and a number of the tributaries of the Cheat system. The greatest number of collections was made in the head- waters of the system. 0. obscurus (fig. 2) occurs in only a few of the lower elevation streams, and was absent from the headwaters and central zone of the watershed. C. b. carinirostris (fig. 1), a species once described from the Cheat system and whose center of abundance was believed to be in the Cheat system streams of Randolph, Tucker, and Pocahontas counties (Faxon, 1914), was not found during the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Mon River Trail
    Upper Monongahela River Water Trail Map and Guide Water trails are recreational waterways on a lake, river, or ocean between specific locations, containing access points and day-use and/or camping sites for the boating public. Water trails emphasize low-impact use and promote stewardship of the resources. Explore this unique West Virginia and Pennsylvania water trail. For your safety and enjoyment: Always wear a life jacket. Obtain proper instruction in boating skills. Know fishing and boating regulations. Be prepared for river hazards. Carry proper equipment. THE MONONGAHELA RIVER The Monongahela River, locally know as “the Mon,” forms at the confluence of the Tygart and West Fork Rivers in Fairmont West Virginia. It flows north 129 miles to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where it joins the Allegheny River to form the Ohio River. The upper section, which is described in this brochure, extends 68 miles from Fairmont to Maxwell Lock and Dam in Pennsylvania. The Monongahela River formed some 20 million years ago. When pioneers first saw the Mon, there were many places where they could walk across it. The Native American named the river “Monongahela,” which is said to mean “river with crumbling or falling banks.” The Mon is a hard-working river. It moves a large amount of water, sediment, and freight. The average flow at Point Marion is 4,300 cubic feet per second. The elevation on the Upper Mon ranges from 891 feet in Fairmont to 763 feet in the Maxwell Pool. PLANNING A TRIP Trips on the Mon may be solitary and silent, or they may provide encounters with motor boats and water skiers or towboats moving barges of coal or limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Trail Inventory
    West Virginia Trail Inventory Trail report summarized by county, prepared by the West Virginia GIS Technical Center updated 9/24/2014 County Name Trail Name Management Area Managing Organization Length Source (mi.) Date Barbour American Discovery American Discovery Trail 33.7 2009 Trail Society Barbour Brickhouse Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.55 2013 Barbour Brickhouse Spur Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 2.73 2013 Barbour Conflicted Desire Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.03 2013 Shortcut Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.46 2013 Barbour Double Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.02 2013 Connector Barbour Double Dip Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.2 2013 Barbour Hospital Loop Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.29 2013 Barbour Indian Burial Ground Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Kid's Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.72 2013 Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.4 2011 Resources Barbour Lower Alum Cave Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.07 2011 Access Resources Barbour Prologue Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.63 2013 Barbour River Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.26 2013 Barbour Rock Cliff Trail Audra State Park WV Division of Natural 0.21 2011 Resources Barbour Rock Pinch Trail Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 1.51 2013 Barbour Short course Bypass Nobusiness Hill Little Moe's Trolls 0.1 2013 Barbour
    [Show full text]
  • District 1 Fishing Guide
    TROUT STOCKING – Rivers and Streams Code No. Stockings ............Period Code No. Stockings ............Period Code No. Stockings ............Period Trout Stocking River or Stream: County SR = state Route Q One .................................... 1st week of March One ......................................................... February CR Varies .............................................................Varies Code: Area CR = county Route FR = USFS Road One ............................................................January BW M One each month ................February-May One every two weeks ...........March-May Tygart Lake (Tailwaters) Tygart Valley River: W Two ......................................................... February MJ One each month ..................January-April Taylor M-F: below Tygart Dam in Grafton City Park. One ............................................................January One each week ..........................March-May Y One ...................................................................April BA BW: Lower – from Wheeling Hospital upstream to I-470; X After April 1 or area is open to public One ............................................................... March F Once/week .....Columbus Day week & next week Wheeling Creek: Marshall and Ohio Middle – from Ohio County line upstream along CR 5 to 1 mile below Burches Run Lake; Upper – from Pennsylvania line 3 miles downstream along CR 15 and 15/1 to mouth of Wolf Run. Whiteday Creek: Marion and Monongalia BW: Lower – from 0.5 mile above CR 73 bridge upstream for 2 miles along CR 73/1; Trout Stocking Upper – from CR 79/12 bridge upstream 1 mile to 0.25 mile below the CR 33/7 bridge. River or Stream: County SR = state Route Code: Area CR = county Route FR = USFS Road BW: from Bruceton Mills upstream to Clifton Mills along CR 8; also at CR 4/2 State Line Bridge near Big Sandy Creek: Preston the Pennsylvania state line. W-F: from Davis upstream 4 miles along the Camp 70 Road; also a 3-mile section at the SR 32 Blackwater River: Tucker bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River
    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River North Fork Watershed Project/Friends of Blackwater MAY 2009 This report was made possible by a generous donation from the MARPAT Foundation. DRAFT 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 THE UPPER NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ................................................................................... 7 PART I ‐ General Information about the North Branch Potomac Watershed ........................................................... 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geography and Geology of the Watershed Area ................................................................................................. 9 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Allegheny and Monongahela River Basins Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, and Maryland, 1996–98
    Water Quality in the Allegheny and Monongahela River Basins Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, and Maryland, 1996–98 U.S. Department of the Interior Circular 1202 U.S. Geological Survey POINTS OF CONTACT AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The companion Web site for NAWQA summary reports: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ Allegheny-Monongahela River contact and Web site: National NAWQA Program: USGS State Representative Chief, NAWQA Program U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Water Resources Division 215 Limekiln Road 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, M.S. 413 New Cumberland, PA 17070 Reston, VA 20192 e-mail: [email protected] http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ http://pa.water.usgs.gov/almn/ Other NAWQA summary reports River Basin Assessments Albemarle-Pamlico Drainage Basin (Circular 1157) Rio Grande Valley (Circular 1162) Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin (Circular 1164) Sacramento River Basin (Circular 1215) Central Arizona Basins (Circular 1213) San Joaquin-Tulare Basins (Circular 1159) Central Columbia Plateau (Circular 1144) Santee River Basin and Coastal Drainages (Circular 1206) Central Nebraska Basins (Circular 1163) South-Central Texas (Circular 1212) Connecticut, Housatonic and Thames River Basins (Circular 1155) South Platte River Basin (Circular 1167) Eastern Iowa Basins (Circular 1210) Southern Florida (Circular 1207) Georgia-Florida Coastal Plain (Circular 1151) Trinity River Basin (Circular 1171) Hudson River Basin (Circular 1165) Upper Colorado River Basin (Circular 1214) Kanawha-New River Basins (Circular
    [Show full text]
  • WVWA Ranked List of Rivers
    WVWA’s Ranked Lists of Rivers, Streams and Creeks The following two lists are a ranking of river sections by paddling difficulty, from easier to more difficult. The rivers were ranked at a flow that a paddler is likely to encounter at an enjoyable level. The sections of larger rivers were ranked assuming a flow somewhere between 1,000 and 3,000 cfs. The creeks and smaller rivers were ranked with a flow somewhere between 200 and 1,000 cfs. A minimum stage or flow is also listed but was not used for ranking purposes. This minimum level may be easier or more difficult and is only listed to indicate a minimum "doable" level. When a classification appears in parentheses it indicates one rapid which is harder that the rapids on the rest of the run. For example, Class II-III+(IV) indicates that one rapid of class IV difficulty may be expected. An * appearing after a river name indicates that adjoining river mileage may be paddled but the additional mileage is harder and may affect the ranking of the river. An ** appearing after the minimum level indicates that a visual gauge is commonly used and a paddler may have to use a conversion factor to obtain that reading. These ranking began with a compilation of rivers and creeks by WVWA member Turner Sharp. The compilations were sent to 25 WVWA members for ranking. Eleven were returned and were used in these rankings. These ranked lists are an attempt to have a consistent method of labeling rivers by difficulty when organizing a trip schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Poster Pitzer Monongahela
    Monongahela River Watershed West Fork, Tygart River Valley, Cheat River, West Fork River Watershed The West Fork River flows north from its headwaters in Upshur and Lewis Counties to Monongahela River Mainstem its confluence with the Tygart Valley River in the City of Fairmont to form the Monon- gahela River. The Monongahela River, also known as “the Mon”, is formed in Fairmont at the confluence of the West Fork and the Tygart Valley Rivers. The Fast facts: Monongahela joins with the Allegheny River to form the Ohio River at Drainage area: 881 square miles Pittsburgh. Length: 103 miles Fast facts: Drainage area in West Virginia: 4.180 square miles The water quality of the West Fork Riverand some of its tributaries is affected by acid mine drainage from active and abandoned underground and surface mines. Length in West Virginia: 37.5. (Total river miles 128.7) ○○○○○○○ Name origin: The Native American word “Monongahela,” means “falling ○○○○○○○○○○○ banks,” in reference to the instability of the river’s banks. Landmarks to show on the map: Tygart Valley River Watershed Blackwater Falls. The falls of the Blackwater River drop about 62 feet at The Tygart Valley River rises near Mingo in Randolph County and flows north, to join the head of the Blackwater Canyon. The River is named for the dark, reddish- the West Fork River in Fairmont to form the Monongahela River. brown water colored by tannic acids that originate from the hemlock and Fast facts: spruce forests that grow in the area. Drainage area: 1,376 square miles Inset graphics or text: Length: 130 miles Navigation and Transportation: A system of nine locks and dams from Fairmont to Pittsburgh make the Monongahela River navigable to Inset graphics or text: accommodate barges transporting steel, coal, and other bulk materials to A 12-mile-long stretch of the river below Buckhannon River is a class III-V and from markets on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2008 Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia Jing Wang West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wang, Jing, "Development of outdoor recreation resource amenity indices for West Virginia" (2008). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2680. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2680 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Development of Outdoor Recreation Resource Amenity Indices for West Virginia Jing Wang Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences At West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Resources Jinyang Deng, Ph.D., Chair Chad
    [Show full text]
  • A Pioneering Research Project by Steve Brown
    A Ghost Fishery Returns to LifeByDNR Steve Brown This circa 1920 photograph shows a lumber mill in the little town of Spruce. In its heyday,WV Spruce was the hub of logging activity on Cheat Mountain. Photo courtesy of the West Virginia and Regional History Center, WVU Libraries his is a story about a ghost town—the mountain was gone. Spruce survived as a railroad town for historic town of Spruce, high atop another two decades, but by 1960, it, too, was gone. A lonely Cheat Mountain. It’s also the story of a sign beside the railroad tracks proclaimed the former town’s ghost fishery—the fabulous brook trout whereabouts. fishery that once existed in the Upper The mighty Shay locomotives, however, survived. They Shavers Fork of the Cheat River. were sold to the state to establish Cass Scenic Railroad State Finally, it’s a story of the role history Park at the southern foot of Cheat Mountain. The railroad played in the loss of that fishery, and tracks down Shavers Fork also survived and are still in use that science is now playing in its successful restoration. today, providing the only motorized access into much of the T The dawn of the twentieth century brought historic roadless upper river. changes to Cheat Mountain, one of the highest, coldest, Sadly, the railroad and the massive logging operations and most remote places in West Virginia. The mountain’s that spawned it profoundly changed the Shavers Fork, degrad- dense red spruce forests attracted logging and paper com- ing fish habitat, warming the water, and severing fish access to panies, which, in 1904, built the town of Spruce.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf
    FISHES OF WEST VIRGINIA By EDMUND LEE GOLDSBOROUGH and H. WALTON CLARK BUREAU OF FISHERIES DOCUMENT NO. 631 29 Blank page retained for pagination FISHES OF WEST VIRGINIA.G By EDMUND LEE GOLDSBOROUGH AND H. WALTON CLARK. CONDITIONS IN THE STREAMS. The particular regions visited in West Virginia were selected because of their former reputation for abundance of fishes, which abundance was now said to be decreasing. It was hoped that the cause of this decrease, if there was a decrease, might be found, and examination was made of all the streams of any importance in those parts of the state visited. It was concluded that the aquatic life in general, and fishes In particular, had been and are now in many streams being greatly injured and in others practically destroyed by the unwise and destructive operations of the lumberman and the miner. There is no doubt that the trout have greatly diminished in numbers in certain localities and that the decrease is continuing. There is, further, no reason why this decrease can not be checked by the enactment and enforcement of protective laws and the Monongahela and upper Potomac basins become an attractive region to the angler, The water of the mountain streams is sufficiently cool for the continued residence of the trout, native and still abundant in certain localities, and efforts to protect and propagate the fish would undoubtedly produce most satisfactory and obvious results. NORTHEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA. The investigations were begunin 1899atBeverly, with a route thence in a sort of irregular circle about the mountainous region, including the headwaters of the Monongahela, Potomac, and Greenbrier or their tributaries.
    [Show full text]