Chaucer's Franklin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chaucer's Franklin Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Spring 1961 Chaucer's Franklin Dale M. Anderson Fort Hays Kansas State College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Dale M., "Chaucer's Franklin" (1961). Master's Theses. 692. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/692 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. to 't .#;. l ' (_ i (! J. • ((_; 1 -'-., C l..} LC i U} t ,O~ B 0 <g,t · i. l · r S r .; •, l ) J I i h Lo t ilr f I" .-•i JT~J 1ml L erer:t n t e I' . 1 to lv t l t n l J ,lph .. Cl or tt,ellin , ;1;. r- lt n t - .o . :.cl (;O l.v oult C bt i C , l d Ehe r.i ,ht \f\;:}~ t ,J(; 1 n:lo 11. i T .J.. l 1 1. • 11 H I. ·~ 3 3t n a.: L i,l ----'r · \-:_ln } · · n h to s Y, itCCG•,tul t' .e ,oi, 1,:,1, 11 n t "' tro· lo to e t t t i.r,c u nt ,l i 1 H to 3lr~,I y 1' l1U • l l :i '\ [ l n l :,.c <le co 1, v) om re 0 t ,;...t ; t, ·c e>ted for cla f' ran; t in r.:uik f ,, ,, fr· klir!, i '0 uf ll u J ·m t,e l >H e OJ. t lis t, lC .. is, I •!l:J oted fr I!l John .,se etl- } 0 I 0:t" q ctt I th·t i,,. lP of c , 0 ar iceF f ·t , ".e ·c 1 •t f1 1 lin"' . f · f 'ic: i I llt t r for t . f t. t C ,._ CO i_. 1 cl i O 1 t t e l( l. n by < t, T 1 c:b t c..:.._a:.;.· ,1 G" x- 1 > I of s . 'l C .t ~-..., t - ruu·aencu ·r · to le() h.-.n cc ' . s f; t f • it on l>lc < ' t l n• 11 0 vern r1t C, ic , n f rt t t d t t i, ( 1 J.,. ~ -, 2 J. 3 S I .e r &1.,i :c t ·ml b Of i· t 1) - • (1 p 1 f cot, n .1 ' l 0 ave ri , r hei· !1;,11 ;l]_ UlC fl ho1 lL .~}t to · or.:. i.rw ind f oe cJ • J. t s he rtlt )(). r - ,;,] t, i '_t, 1 1( - 0 l' 0 tl e cntr.,1 (.; ( t.. " • 5 · o n •ed to :, r,·.0 ·ct : , <,f • , o r:..c~nt, 1 r·o t ,r., !:.>( een Ue no' i ,· on Gl 1 Dh' l iOini, 1 i c1i' t f ll~ T) t! i it,h i k Jl h thy ...: • L: te t t .. i::; tic ----.t.i. C .. 1rt,,,,u ),3/ in n i e 2/1, ( ' ' I ,)l' t 'Ill'~ IO t i·ull 1~ro.1ld, J'iIH: • n ·<·, 19;..i2 • OW.L : , I J Ti l. :i fl{, • , ' t t. C T,· l f t in i • :1 < 0 \) ) 1 s l. 1 • , ,> ·, cat. n , I .I .n---·- ..· ,.·, 10. ~( . l, r, t'ltiy, , l • --·' ( , . 12 ~ - , l i1 ' 0 n n o , OJ v_(·- t I 1' . 13i i.d. 7 u icm ·t t 0 ti. C ,. e; lo;) ; ,.t · l l,;U ..D C ell In u 0., C. , cl IL, C .. (. t l 1C ,l ··rr. o l' t , IO' l'~ ~;eon t ·t .1. 0l :l :J . tbt , 1 . .,_J. ./.. .. - r t cc , e's s t ' s not fd :.i u · ,, CJ i ..; :.. pu 1f,il le OJ r, )f v l, c0r' s 'l : ne e o n ry ·nt er. If { ' :; l bi •·o ., 6 r o .J. , lt i • . o • ~ ., 1 6 w. l . o e orou hl-, 0 le l 0 .19 ut t on-~ e . 2 () C ir r 19_1 .. __ d • 21. ,, ·) C l. L • J ' • ._ 3 j •• ., . et, .-W2;, > . tl-. '\Jr · K, i. ' 'r t 1,1' ... in If i ,er•t d Lo u • •· ot,h..r"' ,..... tr· , :...uc h {i' t - r , i ; ot~er bu0 '•.t.' Jir, k i t : , • 1, ' .l, t t a l th , b "I.- ii J•.' ter t lTP, , vi. 1 t 1 <Ct .,w3 • 1 ~r . t i Uf'eC! 1 t O " l.,ac• >R · • I • , , ( ·.t Lny , ,.l t ~o e, 1· P ,e l,r, vmd ris, 19L6)., 23 • it. ,) . 2r..3, /.1 . lt, • l' V . 0 In th · cu• Ee! int c l]u,.1. 1 c u:1.pt 25 .. J. •Jl • Ac1.. rdLnc o ri•l .. d(n , r l h .iJidorr·c he~ lcen ur>a' ·i L.r erou ' t bbow i' aat fourtec nth century fra. l..:..ns wo L > t.l ,. ;ent1 , even tl o t1 t.t e orilp.nul ortl for 1 ar .Lin t. , •rt, vi ,pl.;, 11 free · 1 . 11 Lowoen c: ~ys that tl..111].y ;,1 .Robl11• on r,J in L/reer 1en L wi tf J I\, lti t·e- CD.UCO of C \ i erc:e he 1,J!: 0 nc to ~;ubc· b.l t,' at.c the ra.: klin 1 < po:..iti n ,"' be.i.n Lhat of l '.0 ontr:·. I I H u1aLle to r.:.nd pr.i. •ci.I".f ovlc,ence of it, 'ut, ;ru:· tel_.__, ' D -:.Lut _'\10.1.i s Clw:.!cor, Geo_· e: 'n s on, ar- a f rnnl-::1.:.n .:. 1 'L 10 ~~f'vCd1~. ccnt..1J~ , ·er!, 1 Le \J,.. ozic -f the esi (;5 pl'Oc l C. tr..e al u ,en • Ce_ l lcrnvet, LLlt-. c• .:.ctioui.ll'..1.t: .... to ~i.flU c;leal'e uv.:. C,tt;C c.1s to Urn 11.e · i'1C of }t<; te>l'rt 11 frar..klin . 11 T e first observati1>ll L~.· t :.; .ou be .,1a<.Je it: t ha -L Li fe ·, case& U,e • 01 d i nn:i ca m) a reer.•" 1 u.S dist.ti 11h,hod f1 , ,. vill· ln wt doe" r1<1t here . at:" • .y furt .~' s-1L C [' on r t L ,or' franklin , in 'Llie >l'rnnpt ariur l'fil'v luru1 ,Jilli r . ''liL-ertinus" ' 11 or lib rti o 1 ,ich , ln ihi t: ird c~efL1.LLla, ·1c::a.11s or,e fr c frn1 self- . -1 28 res t rllUlL . '1early u., ....,.JI·C UD(.) of t. .. or d .:. ::.; f v ..t • 2 8-~. ~r~er 1 ::, :>., \ v Ile .:..~tc ,.,- c ,:, Hill' ' (SprL ;;.:..01 ·: G. · C. fle r riam Lo . , .1.S:,)l) ,-;: 12 ,Ja ·oldi, ·itten in 1..,oJ, e ·c L ! k' ec f ' c er - t.Jl' t ey o, • 30 efcr o hl t <."I. <.:l Sf' hls so:; f 'ic·e.t~ ·l · r i.n ,,t t • f'.i t U •. r)~' li t e C l in '1'}1 t .··-- n of Tl 1eJ· , e GUT1 t . l'i.l u:.liS--1l e ;. 29 rr. ~le c . ~ - ; -- -·-"'•, .i:Jl11. • . C - 1 >, • 34 . ' JO 1 (.>' cl..,. , . 26 ;, 5. 3li I. lJ i f l h~j_ i1 .port ce •cure it • L ,ny 1 • , e, t ,_ r, n · 1 cli idualt ord_. n· J ,n re .:.n . 16 ,. "' r ..... [l (1 ,·tin1:2. di. r.o fr '->n t t, 1Cli i~ 0 lO 0. f . ,. ure. ovi ! ~- l:L- • t is ,cen th, t • i. t y occ .iy ·e. 11 .l:lJ.1,l.O 1H • JS 32 ·8r~u J, op. 1it. , l , 1 ;6 ( ~:. 0c?·. 99), L'} i er 33 :r·oul , ~ - cit. 3 e fo J5r:e,, • 1,·.., -, . ~· -, • 266 1 ,, ,f t j_J•tc ,Il , ·t o ot, . er ... ld n l t)L Lr cl""" .., . 1 pu n. :.11 ... t ,er·-.,i i • s 10 , ote 0 t lirt..., •t' ill C 1 lb •rL o ulou 1::~-1,e1 , JO ·n J., , . l· t l iI C CO ~r S,JJ < , a Jel ~te .l.f v , • cl .:l • , ,i 0 o oft 31 ·er Oi 1 , 1 · ,tr · c l , 1 ( 11" [1 er. · ) , 1, hl, · 1-· 22 . , , 1.., .• c· L. e c. e r ('Ollt, I' Of f. C ,c'OT ·rj_ ,int , , ic • • l ' . (t ~t e- on Il( t n loc. 13 39 e10 1 , ,9__ . .£.::._ . , • 2 , , • ) . ( . l 4 et en the "t· . [, 1.. • l! l. C .a.U.1.. , f. ft~h. C n·1 1 .nr •· ld at t) : uu, ~)~111. '.1.0 t :,n lo•• l • ltJ 1· ..... in Lli.b' < • • J • • r , l..1. , 1 7 ( 1• o loc . c · t . ; • J.. • r· • • 1 ,6 - 1 . ( l.u.; r . f), IT , l }~ . lr t , ,0 , bt, fe l, 1 l' II 1 e ~to ot u. t tl' If- ti.on lt5 n, 00 of r, 1 n II la ch n I . • 6: L 4, ,, E£• P • o . , 2E• --· , l l l l t:~:- t..;l., •, ·_c_1 l ud l iJ cl;•fs . i f <' ' 0 t • r_i l Il t It J. .~l Ir, kl. n d p l t;! , t thcr l' • J o ell .:..1 1 cun ~: le r.e 0.
Recommended publications
  • On the Agricultural Community of the Middle Ages, and Inclosures of the Sixteenth Century in England
    On The Agricultural Community of the Middle Ages, and Inclosures of the Sixteenth Century in England. Second Edition. Translated from the German of Erwin Nasse, by Colonel H. A. Odvey (Late 9th Lancers). “In der Beherrschung der Erde liegt die Kraft des Mannes und des Staates: die Grösse Roms ist gebaut auf die ausgedehnteste und unmittelbarste Herrschaft der Burger uber den Boden and auf die geschlossene Einheit dieser also festgegründeten Bauerschaft.” — MOMMSEN. Erwin Nasse (1829–1890) Originally published 1872. by Williams and Norgate London. This edition published 2003 Batoche Books [email protected] Contents Translator’s Preface. .......................................................................... 5 Preface. .............................................................................................. 6 On the Agricultural Community of the Middle Ages. ....................... 8 Notes: ............................................................................................... 82 Translator’s Preface. The extract from a speech of Richard Cobden, which appeared as a Preface to the First Edition of this work, has been omitted in the present issue, as it might be supposed to stamp with a political character that which is merely an academical essay. H. A. Ouvey. 29, Hyde Park Place, January 1st, 1872. Preface. The translation of this work, which was published under the distin- guished sanction of the Cobden Club by Colonel H. A. Ouvry, C.B., having now reached a second edition, a few explanatory words from the author may not seem out of place. The original treatise was published in 1869, as one of those academical essays which are distributed annually to the Members of this University before the 3rd of August, the anniversary of the day on which the University was founded in 1818. These essays are intended to contain the results of purely scientific researches.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, Bowdoin, and Franklin
    WASH ING T 0 N, BOWDQIN, AND FRANKLIN, AS PORTRAYED IS 0CCASI0NAL AD L) RESSES. WashnQ ton JVitz.o nal Jtioimm ent Proposed heLght in clotted lines, 48.5 fi Completed, shown by dnrk lznes, 174 fi Stone Terrace, 25f* hzgh dLarneter 2OOfS WAS HIN G T 0 N, BOWDOIN, AND FRANKLIN, AS PORTRAYED IN OCCASIONAL ADDRESSES: BY vxi ROBERT C. WINTHROP. I WITH A FEW BRIE-F PIECES ON KINDRED TOPICS, ASD WITH NOTES AKD ILLUSTRATIONS. LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY. 1876. 7 /' Entered according to Act of Congress, in the pear 1876, by LITTLE, BROW6, AND CONIPANY, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Vashington. Cambridge : Press oj 70hWilson and Soti. PREFATORY NOTE. I ‘&VE so often, of late, been called on for copies of some of these productions, -no longer to be found in a separate or convenient form,-that I have ventured to think that they might prove an acceptable contribution to our Centennial Literature. They deal with two, certainly, of the greatest figures of the period we are engaged in commemorating; and BOWDOIN,I am persuaded, will be’ considered no un­ worthy associate of WASHINGTONand FRANKLINin such a publication. The Monument to Washington, to which the first pro­ duction relates, is still unfinished. It may be interesting to recall the fact that the Oration, on the laying of its corner-stone, was to have been delivered by JOHNQUINCY ADAMS. He died a few months before the occasion, and it was as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States, of which he had long been the most illus­ trious member, that I was called on to supply his place.
    [Show full text]
  • RIEVAULX ABBEY and ITS SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 1132-1300 Emilia
    RIEVAULX ABBEY AND ITS SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 1132-1300 Emilia Maria JAMROZIAK Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2001 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr Wendy Childs for her continuous help and encouragement at all stages of my research. I would also like to thank other faculty members in the School of History, in particular Professor David Palliser and Dr Graham Loud for their advice. My thanks go also to Dr Mary Swan and students of the Centre for Medieval Studies who welcomed me to the thriving community of medievalists. I would like to thank the librarians and archivists in the Brotherton Library Leeds, Bodleian Library Oxford, British Library in London and Public Record Office in Kew for their assistance. Many people outside the University of Leeds discussed several aspects of Rievaulx abbey's history with me and I would like to thank particularly Dr Janet Burton, Dr David Crouch, Professor Marsha Dutton, Professor Peter Fergusson, Dr Brian Golding, Professor Nancy Partner, Dr Benjamin Thompson and Dr David Postles as well as numerous participants of the conferences at Leeds, Canterbury, Glasgow, Nottingham and Kalamazoo, who offered their ideas and suggestions. I would like to thank my friends, Gina Hill who kindly helped me with questions about English language, Philip Shaw who helped me to draw the maps and Jacek Wallusch who helped me to create the graphs and tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquisitiones Post Mortem
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society INQUISITIONES POST MOETEM. 281 INQUISITIONES POST MOETEM. FOE a complete elucidation of the following Eecords, a strong temptation presents itself to reprint the fourth and fifth chapters of book ii. of Blackstone's Commen- taries, wherein the entire history of ancient English te- nures is most lucidly treated; but we must not occupy our pages with information that is readily accessible to all who choose to interest themselves in our early con- stitutional history. A few quotations with reference to the different lands of tenure, and specially that by knight-service, will suffice for our present purpose, an explanation, namely, of the origin and nature of the Inquisitions which form the subject of this paper. " Almost all the real property of this kingdom is by the policy of our laws supposed to be granted by, dependent upon, and holden of some superior lord, by and in consideration of certain services to be rendered to the lord by the tenant or possessor of this property. The thing holden is therefore styled a tenement, the possessors thereof tenants, and the manner of their possession a tenure. Thus all the land in the kingdom is supposed to be holden, mediately or immediately, of the king; who is styled the lord paramount, or above all. Such tenants as held under the king immediately, when they granted out portions of their lands to inferior persons, became also lords with respect to those inferior persons, just as they them- selves were still tenants with respect to the king; and, thus partaking of a middle nature, were called mesne, or middle, 282 INQUISITIONES POST MORTEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Serfdom and Wage Earners in European and Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to the Mid-Nineteenth Century
    CHAPTER 1 SECOND SERFDOM AND WAGE EARNERS IN EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN THOUGHT FROM THE ENLIGHTENMENT TO THE MID-NINETEENTH CENTURY The Eighteenth Century: Forced Labor between Reform and Revolution The invention of backwardness in Western economic and philosophical thought owes much to the attention given to Russia and Poland in the beginning of the eighteenth century.1 The definitions of backwardness and of labor—which is the main element of backwardness—lies at the nexus of three interrelated debates: over serfdom in Eastern European, slavery in the colonies, and guild reform in France. The connection between these three debates is what makes the definition of labor—and the distinction between free and forced labor—take on certain character- istics and not others. In the course of the eighteenth century, the work of slaves, serfs, and apprentices came to be viewed not just by ethical stan- dards, but increasingly by its efficiency. On that basis, hierarchies were justified, such as the “backwardness” of the colonies relative to the West, of Eastern relative to Western Europe, and of France relative to England. The chronology is striking. Criticisms of guilds, serfdom, and slavery all hardened during the 1750s; Montesquieu published The Spirit of the Laws in 1748, which was soon followed by the first volumes of the Ency- clopédie.2 In these works the serfdom of absolutist and medieval Europe was contrasted with the free labor of Enlightenment Europe. Abbé de Morelli took up these themes in 1755, condemning both ancient serf- dom and modern forms of slavery, in both the colonies and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Feudalism in Medieval England
    Land and Feudalism in Medieval England by Magistra Rosemounde of Mercia Most people know that the feudal system controlled property ownership in England after the Norman conquest of 1066, but without a real understanding of what that means. Feudalism (the term was not actually used until the 17th century) was a social as well as an economic system. It combined elements of Germanic tradition with both Roman and Church law. It is a law of conquerors. The basis of English feudalism was that every person's position in society was defined through a relationship with land, because land was the major source of revenue and the real source of power. Prior to the Conquest, two types of land holdings were known in England: the Celtic, and later, the Germanic or Saxon. Under Celtic custom, all land was held by the sword. There were no legal institutions to protect ownership, only the owner's ability to hold it. Under the Saxon system, land ownership was tied to families. Land was not held of any superior and was not allowed to leave family possession. This form of holding was called folk-land. Folk-land was measured by dividing it into large counties that were then subdivided into hundreds. Later, as Saxon law was influenced by Roman law and the Christian Church, two other holdings developed: book-land, land that was a gift from a superior, and laen-land, land that was loaned to someone outside the family unit in exchange for something. This changed with the Norman conquest. William the Conqueror and his successors, claimed ownership of all the land in England, and everyone else held their land either directly or indirectly from the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Jimmy Gentry
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE AN INTERVIEW WITH JIMMY GENTRY FOR THE VETERANS ORAL HISTORY PROJECT CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF WAR AND SOCIETY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY INTERVIEW BY G. KURT PIEHLER AND KELLY HAMMOND FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE JULY 22, 2000 TRANSCRIPT BY KELLY HAMMOND REVIEWED BY PATRICK LEVERTON GREGORY KUPSKY KURT PIEHLER: This begins an interview with Jimmy Gentry in Franklin, Tennessee on July 22, 2000 with Kurt Piehler and … KELLY HAMMOND: Kelly Hammond. PIEHLER: I guess I’d like to ask you a very basic question. When were you born, and where were you born? JIMMY GENTRY: I was born right here. Not in town; just out of Franklin, in what is now called Wyatt Hall. My family rented that house. I was there, but I don’t remember. (Laughs) So I was born right here. PIEHLER: What date were your born? GENTRY: Uh, November 28, 1924 or 5. Don’t ask me those questions like that. (Laughter) ’25, I believe, ‘cause I’ll soon be seventy-five. That must be right. PIEHLER: And you are native of Franklin. GENTRY: I really am. I have lived in Franklin, outside of Franklin, which is now in Franklin, and now I am back outside of Franklin. But Franklin is my home base, yes. PIEHLER: And could you maybe talk a little bit about your parents first? I guess, beginning with your father? GENTRY: Alright. My father originally came from North Carolina. Marshall, North Carolina, as I recall, near Asheville, and then he worked first for the railroad company for a short time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Franklin's Tale
    The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer 1/44 Contents Part One: The Prologue................................................................................3 Part Two: The Knight's Tale........................................................................ 8 Part Three: The Nun's Priest's Tale............................................................14 Part Four: The Pardoner's Tale...................................................................20 Part Five: The Wife of Bath's Tale.............................................................26 Part Six: The Franklin's Tale......................................................................32 Track 1: Part One Listening Exercise 4.................................................. 38 Track 2: Part Two Listening Exercise 5..................................................39 Track 3: Part Three Listening Exercise 4................................................40 Track 4: Part Four Listening Exercise 4................................................. 41 Track 5: Part Five Listening Exercise 5&6.............................................43 Track 6: Part Six Listening Exercise 4....................................................44 2/44 Part One: The Prologue In April, when the sweet showers① fallandfeedtherootsintheearth,the flowers begin to bloom②. The soft wind blows from the west and the young sun rises in the sky. The small birds sing in the green forests. Then people want to go on pilgrimages. from every part of England, they go to Canterbury to visit the tomb of Thomas Becket, the martyr③, who helped the sick. My name is Geoffrey Chaucer .People say that I am a poet but I am not really very important. I am just a story-teller. One day in spring, I was stayinginLondonattheTabardInn④. At night, a great crowd of people arrived at the inn, ready to go on a pilgrimage to Canterbury. I soon made friends with them and promised to join them. 'You must get up early,' they told me. 'We are leaving when the sun rises.' Before I begin my story, I will describe the pilgrims to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism In
    QUIA EMPTORES, SUBINFEUDATION, AND THE DECLINE OF FEUDALISM IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND: FEUDALISM, IT IS YOUR COUNT THAT VOTES Michael D. Garofalo Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2017 APPROVED: Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Chair Laura Stern, Committee Member Mickey Abel, Minor Professor Harold Tanner, Chair of the Department of History David Holdeman, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Garofalo, Michael D. Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism in Medieval England: Feudalism, it is Your Count that Votes. Master of Science (History), August 2017, 123 pp., bibliography, 121 titles. The focus of this thesis is threefold. First, Edward I enacted the Statute of Westminster III, Quia Emptores in 1290, at the insistence of his leading barons. Secondly, there were precedents for the king of England doing something against his will. Finally, there were unintended consequences once parliament passed this statute. The passage of the statute effectively outlawed subinfeudation in all fee simple estates. It also detailed how land was able to be transferred from one possessor to another. Prior to this statute being signed into law, a lord owed the King feudal incidences, which are fees or services of various types, paid by each property holder. In some cases, these fees were due in the form of knights and fighting soldiers along with the weapons and armor to support them. The number of these knights owed depended on the amount of land held. Lords in many cases would transfer land to another person and that person would now owe the feudal incidences to his new lord, not the original one.
    [Show full text]
  • Black's Law Dictionary®
    BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY® Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern By HENRY CAMPBELL BLACK, M. A. SIXTH EDITION BY THE PUBLISHER'S EDITORIAL STAFF Coauthors JOSEPH R. NOLAN Associate Justice, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and JACQUELINE M. NOLAN-HALEY Associate Clinical Professor, Fordham University School of Law Contributing Authors M. J. CONNOllY Associate Professor (Linguistics), College of Arts & Sciences, Boston College STEPHEN C. HICKS Professor of Law, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA MARTINA N. All BRANDI Certified Public Accountant, Bolton, MA ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO. 1990 "BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY" is a registered trademark of West Publishing Co. Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. COPYRIGHT @ 1891, 1910, 1933, 1951, 1957, 1968, 1979 WEST PUBLISHING CO. COPYRIGHT @ 1990 By WEST PUBLISHING CO. 50 West Kellogg Boulevard P.O. Box 64526 St. Paul, Mn 55164-0526 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Black, Henry Campbell, 1850-1927. [Law dictionary] Black's law dictionary / by Henry Campbell Black. - 6th ed. / by the publisher's editorial staff; contributing authors, Joseph R. Nolan ... let al.] p. cm. ISBN 0-314-76271-X 1. Law-United States-Dictionaries. 2. Law-Dictionaries. I. Nolan, Joseph R. II. Title. KF156.B53 1990 340' .03-dc20 90-36225 CIP ISBN 0-314-76271-X ISBN 0-314-77165-4 deluxe Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. 2nd Reprint-1990 PREFACE This new Sixth Edition starts a second century for Black's Law Dictionary-the standard authority for legal definitions since 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentaries on the Laws of England : in Four Books / by Sir William
    THE FEUDAL SYSTEM. 43 Chap. 4.] These are the general divisions of rent; but the difference between them (in respect to the method of recovering them) is now totally abolished; and all persons may have the like remedy by distress for rents-seck, rents of assize, and chief-rents, as in case of rents reserved upon lease. (g) Rent is regularly due and payable upon the land from whence it issues, if no particular place is mentioned in the reservation: (h) but in case of the king, the payment must be either to his officers at the exchequer, or to his receiver in the country. (i) And strictly the rent is demandable and payable before the time of sunset of the day whereon it is reserved; (k) though perhaps not absolutely due till midnight. (l) With regard to the original of rents, something will be said in the next chapter; and, as to distresses, and other remedies for their recovery; the doctrine relating thereto, and the several proceedings thereon, these i. properly to the third part of our Commentaries, which will treat of civil injuries, and the means whereby they are redressed. CHAPTER IV. OF THE FEUDAL SYSTEM. It is impossible to understand with any degree of accuracy, either the civil constitution of this kingdom, (1) or the laws which regulate its landed property, without some general acquaintance with the nature and doctrine of feuds, or the feudal law : a system so universally received throughout Europe upwards of twelve centuries ago, that Sir Henry Spelman (a) does not scruple to call it the law of nations in our western world.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin's Tale
    FRANKLIN’S TALE The Portrait, Prologue and Tale of the Franklin FRANKLIN’S TALE 1 The portrait of the Franklin from the General Prologue where he is shown as a generous man who enjoys the good things of life. He travels in the company of a rich attorney, the Man of Law A FRANKLIN was in his company. rich landowner White was his beard as is the daisy. Of his complexïon he was sanguine.1 ruddy & cheerful Well loved he by the morrow a sop in wine. in the a.m. 335 To liv•n in delight was ever his won, custom For he was Epicurus's own son That held opinïon that plain delight total pleasure Was very felicity perfite. 2 truly perfect happiness A householder and that a great was he; 340 Saint Julian he was in his country.3 His bread, his ale, was always after one. of one kind i.e. good A better envin•d man was never none. with better wine cellar Withouten bak•d meat was never his house food Of fish and flesh, and that so plenteous 345 It snow•d in his house of meat and drink food Of all• dainties that men could bethink. After the sundry seasons of the year according to So chang•d he his meat and his supper. Full many a fat partridge had he in mew pen 350 And many a bream and many a luce in stew. fish / in pond Woe was his cook but if his sauc• were Poignant and sharp, and ready all his gear.4 tangy His table dormant in his hall alway set / always Stood ready covered all the long• day.
    [Show full text]