News Digest on Georgia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
YOUTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION at the LOCAL LEVEL: IMERETI and TBILISI © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
YOUTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: IMERETI AND TBILISI © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung This Publication is funded by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung. Commercial use of all media published by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is not permitted without the written consent of the FES. YOUTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: IMERETI AND TBILISI Tbilisi 2020 Youth Policy Implementation at the Local Level: Imereti and Tbilisi Tbilisi 2020 PUBLISHERS Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, South Caucasus South Caucasus Regional Offi ce Ramishvili Str. Blind Alley 1, #1, 0179 http://www.fes-caucasus.org Tbilisi, Georgia Analysis and Consulting Team (ACT) 8, John (Malkhaz) Shalikashvili st. Tbilisi, 0131, Georgia Parliament of Georgia, Sports and Youth Issues Committee Shota Rustaveli Avenue #8 Tbilisi, Georgia, 0118 FOR PUBLISHER Felix Hett, FES, Salome Alania, FES AUTHORS Plora (Keso) Esebua (ACT) Sopho Chachanidze (ACT) Giorgi Rukhadze (ACT) Sophio Potskhverashvili (ACT) DESIGN LTD PolyGraph, www.poly .ge TYPESETTING Gela Babakishvili TRANSLATION & PROOFREADING Lika Lomidze Eter Maghradze Suzanne Graham COVER PICTURE https://www.freepik.com/ PRINT LTD PolyGraph PRINT RUN 150 pcs ISBN 978-9941-8-2018-2 Attitudes, opinions and conclusions expressed in this publication- not necessarily express attitudes of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung does not vouch for the accuracy of the data stated in this publication. © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung 2020 FOREWORD Youth is important. Many hopes are attached to the “next generation” – societies tend to look towards the young to bring about a value change, to get rid of old habits, and to lead any country into a better future. -
6. Imereti – Historical-Cultural Overview
SFG2110 SECOND REGIONAL DEVELOPMETN PROJECT IMERETI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IMERETI TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Public Disclosure Authorized STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, CULTURAL HERITAGE AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Tbilisi, December, 2014 ABBREVIATIONS GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System IFI International Financial Institution IRDS Imereti Regional Development Strategy ITDS Imereti Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MoJ Ministry of Justice MoESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit PPE Personal protective equipment RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 0 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................... -
2018 Presidential Election First Interim Report of the Pre-Election Monitoring
2018 Presidential Election First Interim Report of the Pre-Election Monitoring (August 1 - September 8) 13 September 2018 This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). Views expressed in this publication belong solely to the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or the NED. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 2 III. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Electoral Administration ............................................................................................................. 5 Appointment of Temporary Members of DECs ................................................................................. 5 V. Media environment ........................................................................................................................ 9 VI. Intimidation/harassment on alleged political grounds ...................................................... 12 VII. Physical confrontation .............................................................................................................. -
Tradiciuli Mravalxmianobis Mecxre Saertasoriso Simpoziumi
tradiciuli mravalxmianobis mecxre saerTaSoriso IA simpoziumi G BILISI, GEOR BILISI, T 30 oqtomberi _ 3 noemberi 2018 Tbilisi, saqarTvelo 2018 2018 BER THE NINTH M E INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRADITIONAL POLYPHONY NOV 3 – OCTOBER 30 1 simpoziumi tardeba saqarTvelos prezidentis giorgi margvelaSvilis patronaJiT simpoziumis finansuri mxardamWeri: saqarTvelos ganaTlebis, mecnierebis, kulturisa da sportis saministro simpoziumis organizatorebi: Tbilisis vano sarajiSvilis saxelobis saxelmwifo konservatoria Tsk-is tradiciuli mravalxmianobis kvlevis saerTaSoriso centri qarTuli xalxuri simReris saerTaSoriso centri saqarTvelos folkloris saxelmwifo centri simpoziumi eZRvneba saqarTvelos pirveli respublikis 100 wlisTavs saqarTvelos damfuZnebeli kreba, Tbilisi, 1918 Constituent Assembly of Georgia, Tbilisi, 1918 THE SYMPOSIUM IS DEDICATED TO THE 100th ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA THE SYMPOSIUM IS HELD UNDER THE PATRONAGE OF GIORGI MARGVELASHVILI, PRESIDENT OF GEORGIA BY THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, CULTURE AND SPORTS OF GEORGIA ORGANIZERS OF THE SYMPOSIUM: VANO SARAJISHVILI TBILISI STATE CONSERVATOIRE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR TRADITIONAL POLYPHONY OF TSC THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR GEORGIAN FOLK SONG THE STATE FOLKLORE CENTRE OF GEORGIA GIORGI MARGVELASHVILI PRESIDENT OF GEORGIA The respect, safeguarding and transmission of old Georgian traditions to young generations is an honorable and valuable deed. I am delighted that this year the 9th International giorgi Symposium on Traditional Polyphony, held under margvelaSvili the Georgian President’s patronage, is dedicated to saqarTvelos the 100th anniversary of Georgian Republic and is prezidenti being realized by a group of professionals. Georgian traditional music holds a distinguished Zveli, qarTuli tradiciebis pativiscema, gafrTxileba da momavali place among world polyphonies. The intangible TaobebisaTvis gadacema sapatio da dasafasebeli saqmea. treasures of a nation need to be presented and pro- moted. -
Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. -
Integrated Solid Waste Management Kutaisi, Georgia Stakeholder Engagement Plan
Integrated Solid Waste Management Kutaisi, Georgia Stakeholder Engagement Plan Draft February, 2016 CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE 3 1.1 OBJECTIVE 3 1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 4 1.3 SOCIAL CONTEXT 4 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 4 2.1 GEORGIAN REQUIREMENTS 5 2.2 INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 6 3 PAST STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 10 3.1 SCOPING/ BASELINE DATA GATHERING 10 3.2 UXO CLEARANCE 10 4 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGAMENT PROGRAM 11 5 GIEVANCE PROCEDURE 16 5.1 OVERVIEW 16 5.2 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 16 6 RECORDING AND MONITORING STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 18 6.1 STAKEHOLDER REGISTER 18 6.2 REPORTING 18 6.3 EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS 18 ANNEXES A: Stakeholder List B: Attendees Lists of Stakeholder Meetings C: Grievance Form SWMCG DRAFT FEBRUARY 2016 ISWM PROJECT KUTAISI, GEORGIA 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN 1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This document is the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) for the Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Project in Kutaisi, Georgia (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”). The Project is being developed by the Project Executing Agency: Georgian Waste Management Company (SWMCG) to enhance waste management in the City of Kutaisi and the two municipalities Chognari and Godogani. The Project is realized within the framework of the Georgian-German financial cooperation. KfW supports the Self-Governing City of Kutaisi in its efforts to establish an integrated solid waste management System. 1.1 OBJECTIVE Stakeholder engagement refers to a process of sharing information and knowledge, seeking to understand and respond to the concerns of others, and building relationships based on collaboration. Stakeholder consultation and disclosure are key elements of engagement and essential for delivery of successful projects. -
Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL
Chapter V Affordable, Quality Healthcare and Social Security 1.1. Social Security of Population (Program Code: 35 02) Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL 1.1.1. Pension Payments to Population (Program Code: 35 02 01) • Beneficiaries of state pensions and state compensations envisaged in Laws of Georgia on State pension, State Commensations and State Academic Bursaries have been paid pensions through financing the commitments made by the State on pension payments; • State pensions have been paid in January to over 708.1 thousand individuals, in February – to over 708.6 thousand individuals, in March – to over 709.4 thousand individuals, in April – to over 710.6 thousand individuals, in May – to over 711.5 thousand individuals, in June – to over 713.0 thousand individuals, in July – to over 714,2 thousand individuals, in August – to over 716.3 thousand individuals, in September – to over 717.8 thousand individuals, while state compensations have been paid in January-February to over 20.7-20.7 thousand beneficiaries, in March – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries, in April-May – to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries, in June – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries and July-September - to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries. Total expenditure towards this end in the reporting period has been 1 153.1 MLN GEL. 1.1.2. Social Security of Targeted Groups of Population (Program Code: 35 02 02) • Number of beneficiaries getting subsistance minimum in January has amounted over 407.3 thousand individuals, February – over 422.0 thousand -
National Assessment of Georgian Municipalities (2019)
RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% % 21% 31% % 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% 31% 21% 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Proactive Disclosure of Public Information Participation and Accountability Administrative General The Council of Civil Advisors 7% Expenses 50% Information is yet to be created in MUNICIPALITIES 11% 11 Legal 40% Entities Legal Acts and Court Decisions 19% 33% Budget Property Only 26 MAYORS MAJORITY OF MEMBERS of only 15 held public hearings of their municipal councils held public hearings of 29% performance reports their performance -
The Public Administration Reform (Par) Roadmap Monitoring in 8 Municipalities of Western Georgia
IMERETI, RACHA-LECHKHUMI, GURIA THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM (PAR) ROADMAP MONITORING IN 8 MUNICIPALITIES OF WESTERN GEORGIA REPORT No3 2021 1 CSO FORUM MEETINGS AND TRAININGS SWOT THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM (PAR) ROADMAP MONITORING IN 8 MUNICIPALITIES OF WESTERN GEORGIA REPORT No 3 VANI, TERJOLA, BAGDATI, KHONI AMBROLAURI, TSAGERI, LANCHKHUTI, OZURGETI Publication prepared by Published under the THE CULTURAL-HUMANITARIAN FUND “SUKHUMI” project “A Common THE FUND OF WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS Forum of CSOs from Guria, Imereti and IMERETI SCIENTISTS’ UNION “SPECTRI” Racha-Lechkhumi for PAR Roadmap The Director of the project: Monitoring”. ALLA GAMAKHARIA (The Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”) This publication has been produced with the assistance of the The project coordinators: European Union. Its TEA TORINAVA (The Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”) contents are the sole MERI GELASHVILI (The Fund of Women Entrepreneurs) responsibility of the Cultural-Humanitarian KETEVAN TSKHAKAIA (Imereti Scientists’ Union “Spectri”) Fund “Sukhumi” and do not necessarily Editor: LALI SHENGELIA reflect the views of the Editor: LALI SHENGELIA European Union.” Translator: DIANA KUSIANI 2021 CONTENTS PROGRESS ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM (PAR) IMPLEMENTATION IN LOCAL SELF - GOVERNMENTS THE THIRD MONITORING CONSOLIDATED REPORT 6 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. MONITORING AIM AND METHODOLOGY 7 3. MONITORING FINDINGS - PROGRESS AND GAP ASSESSMENT 9 3.1. TRANSPARENCY 9 3.2. EFFICIENCY 13 3.3. INCLUSIVENESS/PARTICIPATION 15 4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS -
Organic Law of Georgia on Changes to the Election
Strasbourg, 13 January 2016 CDL-REF(2016)001 Opinion No. 834 / 2016 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ORGANIC LAW OF GEORGIA ON CHANGES TO THE ELECTION CODE OF GEORGIA (ON REDRAWING OF CONSTITUENCIES) ADOPTED ON 8 JANUARY 2016 This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2016)001 - 2 - Article 1. Organic Law of Georgia on the "Election Code of Georgia" (Legislative Herald of Georgia (www.matsne.gov.ge), 10.01.2012, registration code: 010190020.04.001.016032) shall be amended as follows: 1. Article 14, paragraph 1, subparagraph "e" shall be formed as follows: „e) by an ordinance, set up election districts and/or specify their boundaries in accordance with the procedures prescribed by this Law; ". 2. Article 18 shall be formed as follows: "Article 18. Election Districts 1. Election districts, their boundaries, titles and numbers shall be determined in accordance with this Law by a CEC ordinance, except for cases defined by paragraph 2 of this Article. 2. For the elections of the Parliament of Georgia, majoritarian districts shall be set up, their boundaries and numbers shall be determined in accordance with this Law and based on the procedures set by Articles 110 and 1101 of this Law." 3. Paragraph 2 of Article 19 shall be formed as follows: "2. The CEC is authorized to set up, by an ordinance, one DEC within boundaries of one or more self-governing units and 10 DECs in Tbilisi.". 4. Article 110 shall be formed as follows: "Article 110. -
Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment September 2018 Final GEO: East–West Highway (Khevi–Ubisa Section) Improvement Project Section F2 of the Khevi–Ubisa–Shorapani–Argveta Road (E60 Highway) Part 4 – Main Text Section F (cont…) Prepared by JV IRD Engineering S.R.L. & Spea Engineering S.p.A for the Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia and for the Asian Development Bank. (This is an updated version of the draft originally posted on 6 September 2018 available on [https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/geo-49257-001-eia-0]). This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Section F2 of the Khevi-Ubisa-Shorapani-Argveta Road (E60 Highway) Environmental Impact Assessment Unit 1 UTM T38: 0356876E Y 4663234N Habitat 91EO - Alluvial forest with Adler trees and Ash Projection vegetation coverage 50% Alnus barbata 3 Carpinus orientalis 2 Fraxinus excelsior 2 Gleditsia triacanthos 2 Rosa canina 1 Ficus carica 1 Rubus sp. 1 Sambucus ebulus 1 Low sensitivity habitat Location – near the crossroad and bridge Modified Unit 2 landscape – pastures and developed land. -
Election Code of Georgia
Organic Law of Georgia Election Code of Georgia Section I. General Part Chapter I - General Provisions Article 1 - Scope of the Law This Law regulates relations connected with preparation and conduct of referenda, plebiscites, and elections of the President of Georgia, the Parliament of Georgia, a local self-government representative body – Sakrebulo (‘Sakrebulo’), and of a local self-government executive body - Mayor/Gamgebeli (head of local administration). This Law establishes the rights and guarantees of election participants, the procedure for the establishment of the Electoral Administration of Georgia and its powers; also, where so provided for by this Law, the procedure for resolution of disputes. [Article 1 - Scope of the Law This Law regulates relations connected with preparation and conduct of referenda, plebiscites, and elections of the President of Georgia, the Parliament of Georgia, a municipality representative body called Sakrebulo (‘the Sakrebulo’), and of a municipality executive body - a Mayor. This Law establishes the rights and guarantees of election participants, the procedure for the establishment of the Electoral Administration of Georgia and its powers; also, where so provided for by this Law, the procedure for resolution of disputes (shall enter into force from the date of the official announcement of the results of regular elections of local self-government bodies of 2017)] Organic Law of Georgia No 2093 of 7 March 2014 – website, 14.3.2014 Organic Law of Georgia No 1232 of 26 July 2017 – website, 29.7.2017