2019 Program Book

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 Program Book 44TH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM SSTAR 2019 Complexities of Connection in Sex and Relationships: From Technology to Touch The Hyatt Regency Toronto Toronto, Ontario May 2-5 2019 Continuing Medical Education credit is provided through joint providership with The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. SSTAR EXECUTIVE COUNCIL 2018-2019 President 2019 Scientific Program Co-Chair Kathryn Hall, PhD Morag Yule, PhD, CPsych Past President Membership Officer Daniel Watter, EdD Amy Rosenberg, LCSW President-Elect Communications Chair Sophie Bergeron, PhD Serena Corsini-Munt, PhD Secretary – Treasurer Officer Student/ECP Representative Anne Katz, PhD, RN, FAAN Emma Dargie, PhD Continuing Education Officer Junior Student Representative Elizabeth Grill, PsyD Fannie Carrier Emond, PhD candidate 2019 Scientific Program Chair 2019 Local Program Co-Chairs Tuuli Kukkonen, PhD, CPsych James Cantor, PhD, CPsych Morag Yule, PhD, CPsych 1 SOCIAL MEDIA The use of social media is ubiquitous in today’s world and used properly, is an effective communications tool. STARR speakers, please be aware that we have established a Twitter account for this year’s conference, @TheRealSSTAR, that some audience members may utilize to live-tweet content of various conference presentations. Live tweeting is a way for those not in attendance to gain presentation insight in real time and we encourage online interactions and engagement. For those attendees tweeting, please remember to keep your content professional and appropriate to furthering the mission of SSTAR. IN MEMORIA Linda Alperstein, MSW, LCSW ● Gina Ogden, PhD, LMFT ● Hollis Steer Brown, RN ● Brian Zamboni, PhD, LP 2019 SSTAR AWARD RECIPIENTS 2019 Consumer Book Award 2019 Sandra R. Leiblum Student Research Award Recipient: Laurie Mintz, PhD: Becoming Cliterate: Why Recipient: Laura Vowels, PhD student, Department of Orgasm Equality Matters – And How to Get It Psychology at University of Southampton, UK 2019 Mentorship Award Recipient: Irving Binik, PhD 2018-2019 DONORS TO THE SANDRA R. LEIBLUM STUDENT FUND BETWEEN 8/29/18 - 3/27/19 Mark Ackerman Elizabeth Larson Lisa Anllo Rebecca Love Barbara Bartlik* Samantha Lutz Deborah Berry* Ann Manley* Audrey Brassard Wednesday Martin Chris Creatura Caroline Maykut “Your guide to Emma Dargie Jennifer McComb Cyndi Darnell* Hani Miletski transcendent sex.” Marie-Ève Daspe Wendy Miller* Eva Dillon* Laurie Mintz Marian Dunn Sharon Nathan —IAN KERNER, Merry Frons Ursula Ofman Mimi Gelb Anabel Perez-Gonzalez author of the Elisabeth Gordon Alicia Pinkston New York Times bestseller, Elizabeth Grill Claudia Piper She Comes First Sandra Guberman Natalie O. Rosen Kathryn Hall Lillian Rosenblatt Suki Hanfling Amy Rosenberg Anita Hoffer Marsha Rosenberg Jackie Huberman Bonnie Saks Meg Kaplan Caroline Russell Smith Erika Karp* Richard Siegel Sari Kessler* Portia Sipes* Caroline Klein LouAnn Smith Julie Kolzet* Amy Steinhauer REVEAL PRESS Joe Kort Sharna Striar AN IMPRINT OF NEW HARBINGER PUBLICATIONS Chris Kraft Christina Tobey www.newharbinger.com Richard Krueger Beverly Zagofsky *Not a SSTAR member 2 44TH ANNUAL MEETING SSTAR 2019 PRESIDENT’S WELCOME LETTER Welcome to the new and improved SSTAR Annual Meeting. “Wait! This is the 44th Annual Meeting – how can it be new?” you ask. Here’s how: We have several speakers who are new to the SSTAR stage. Among these newcomers are Trevor Hart (speaking about NEW therapeutic approaches for gay and bisexual men), Markie Twist (Digisexuality and Digiattachment are new to me!) and our NEW SSTAR member Laurie Mintz will help us all become more cliterate. What’s also new is Toronto. This vibrant, cosmopolitan, Canadian city is a new destination for SSTAR and our social program, arranged by James Cantor and Morag Yule, will help us sample some of what Toronto has to offer. Happily, our Scientific Chair, Tuuli Kukkonen, along with Morag Yule, have organized a program that matches the city for diversity and vibrancy. Research panels will again bring us NEW results and insights. Meredith Chivers will be presenting on a new self-report measure for responsive desire in women, Debbie Herbenick will be sharing some new perspectives on longitudinal data and while we have had panels, workshops and plenaries on gender transitioning, we gain a new perspective by examining the more controversial issue of detransitioning. Paper sessions focusing on child maltreatment, men’s sexual pain and infertility, among other topics, along with our data blitz sessions, will give us new data to inform our treatment decisions and research questions. New workshops, new ideas in our Poster session and new ethical issues to tackle are all part of the mix. We also have a NEW award to bestow: the inaugural SSTAR Mentorship Award is being given to Irv Binik of McGill University. Congratulations, Irv! Most importantly, we have many NEW MEMBERS! Please join me in welcoming them to SSTAR. We will formally welcome new SSTAR members at the cocktail reception preceding the poster session, but new members - we will informally welcome you throughout the conference. Introduce yourself during breaks! Pull up a chair at lunch! Brave the walk to the microphone during sessions! Your involvement is necessary for the growth and development of SSTAR. New members, new ideas, new insights and new experiences improve SSTAR so each year we can boldly proclaim that we are NEW and IMPROVED. Veteran and novice SSTAR members have been participating in our NEW MENTORSHIP program. Come meet your mentor at the early part of the cocktail hour. The mentorship program welcomes NEW applications from prospective mentors and mentees. As a final note, SSTAR will welcome Sophie Bergeron as the new SSTAR President. SSTAR could not be in better hands. I am immensely grateful to Sophie who was an involved and active President-Elect. My two years as SSTAR President were truly rewarding because of Sophie, and all who served on the Executive Committee and the various subcommittees. Welcome to Toronto and the 44th new and improved Annual Meeting. Warm regards, Kathryn Hall, PhD President, Society for Sex Therapy and Research 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, CONTINUING EDUCATION ACCREDITATIONS & APPROVALS The SSTAR 2019 Annual Meeting is fully accredited and approved toward continuing education credits for psychologists, sexologists, physicians, social workers, and marriage and family therapists. Participants of SSTAR meetings are responsible for knowing and adhering to their state-specific CE requirements. For questions or concerns about continuing education credits, please contact the SSTAR Continuing Education Officer, Elizabeth Grill, PsyD, at (646) 962-3314 or [email protected]. Continuing Medical Education credit is provided through joint providership with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 1. ACCME ACCREDITATION This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint providership of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Sex Therapy and Research. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. AMA PRA CATEGORY 1 CREDIT(S)™ The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists designates this live activity for a maximum of 22 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. COLLEGE COGNATE CREDIT(S) The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists designates this live activity for a maximum of 22 Category 1 College Cognate Credits. The College has a reciprocity agreement with the AMA that allows AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ to be equivalent to College Cognate Credits. DISCLOSURE OF FACULTY AND INDUSTRY RELATIONSHIPS In accordance with College policy, all faculty and planning committee members have signed a conflict of interest statement in which they have disclosed any financial interests or other relationships with industry relative to topics they will discuss at this program. At the beginning of the program, faculty members are required to disclose any such information to participants. Such disclosure allows you to better evaluate the objectivity of the information presented in lectures. Please report on your evaluation form any undisclosed conflict of interest you perceive. 2. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SEXUALITY EDUCATORS, COUNSELORS AND THERAPISTS (AASECT) SSTAR is an approved Individual Provider of Continuing Education credits. This program meets the requirements of the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists (AASECT) and is approved for up to 22 CE credits. These CE credits may be applied toward AASECT certification and renewal of certification. SSTAR (#05-101A). 3. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (APA) SSTAR is approved by the American Psychological Association (APA) to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. SSTAR maintains responsibility for this program and its content. This program qualifies for up to 22 CE credits. 4. NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (NYSED) Society for Sex Therapy and Research, (SSTAR) SW CPE is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Social Work as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed social workers, LMSW, LCSW in New York State, #0100. This program qualifies for up to 22 contact hours. 5. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Recommended publications
  • 1557-Final-Rule.Pdf
    *This HHS‐approved document is being submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication and has not yet been placed on public display at or published in the Federal Register. This document may vary slightly from the published document if minor editorial changes are made during the OFR review process. The document published in the Federal Register is the official HHS-approved document. *Individuals using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this document. For assistance, please contact the Office for Civil Rights at (800) 368-1019 or (800) 537-7697 (TDD). 4153-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 438, 440, and 460 Office of the Secretary 45 CFR Parts 86, 92, 147, 155, and 156 RIN 0945-AA11 Nondiscrimination in Health and Health Education Programs or Activities, Delegation of Authority AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Office of the Secretary, HHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (“the Department” or “HHS”) is committed to ensuring the civil rights of all individuals who access or seek to access health programs or activities of covered entities under Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). After considering public comments, in this final rule, the Department revises its Section 1557 regulations, Title IX regulations, and specific regulations of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) as proposed, with minor and primarily technical corrections. This will better comply with the mandates of Congress, address legal concerns, relieve billions of dollars in undue regulatory burdens, further substantive compliance, *This HHS‐approved document is being submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication and has not yet been placed on public display at or published in the Federal Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Affidavit of Dr. Stephen B. Levine, M.D. Case 1:20-Cv-00184-DCN Document 46-2 Filed 06/09/20 Page 2 of 45
    Case 1:20-cv-00184-DCN Document 46-2 Filed 06/09/20 Page 1 of 45 EXHIBIT B Expert Affidavit of Dr. Stephen B. Levine, M.D. Case 1:20-cv-00184-DCN Document 46-2 Filed 06/09/20 Page 2 of 45 ________________________________________ EXPERT AFFIDAVIT OF DR. STEPHEN B. LEVINE, M.D. ________________________________________ June 4, 2020 Case 1:20-cv-00184-DCN Document 46-2 Filed 06/09/20 Page 3 of 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CREDENTIALS & SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 II. BACKGROUND ON THE FIELD ......................................................................................... 6 A. The biological baseline of sex .......................................................................................... 6 B. Definition and diagnosis of gender dysphoria .................................................................. 8 C. Impact of gender dysphoria on minority and vulnerable groups .................................... 10 D. Three competing conceptual models of gender dysphoria and transgender identity ............................................................................................................................ 11 E. Four competing models of therapy ................................................................................. 14 F. Patients Differ Widely and Must Be Considered Individually. ...................................... 19 G. Understanding the WPATH and its “Standards of Care” ............................................... 21 III. GENDER IDENTITY,
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Gender Non-Conforming and Trans-Identified Students In
    Supporting gendernon-conforming and trans-identified students in schools A resource pack for schools www.transgendertrend.com Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................4 Why is this needed? ......................................................................................5 Guidance for school leaders ..............................................................................6 Context: ........................................................................................................6 School leadership .........................................................................................6 Advice and training .......................................................................................7 Policy, good practice and school rules ..........................................................7 Sex‑segregated facilities ...............................................................................8 School ethos .................................................................................................8 Influences .....................................................................................................8 Talking with other children ...........................................................................9 Confidentiality ..............................................................................................9 Attendance .................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of School Closure On
    Navigating the Stigma of Pedophilia: The Experiences of Nine Minor-Attracted Men in Canada by Carin Marie Freimond B.A. (Sociology), Simon Fraser University, 2009 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Carin Marie Freimond 2013 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2013 Approval Name: Carin Marie Freimond Degree: Master of Arts of Sociology Title of Thesis: Navigating the Stigma of Pedophilia: The Experiences of Nine Minor-Attracted Men in Canada Examining Committee: Chair: Kathleen Millar Assistant Professor Robert Menzies Senior Supervisor Professor Ann Travers Supervisor Associate Professor Jacqueline Faubert External Examiner Adjunct Professor Criminology Simon Fraser University Date Defended/Approved: October 29, 2013 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Ethics Statement iv Abstract This thesis presents findings and analysis arising from semi-structured qualitative interviews with nine minor-attracted men (i.e. men who are primarily attracted to children and/or adolescents) in Canada. The central research question is “how do minor-attracted people understand and manage their stigmatized identities?” I situated the participants' experiences within a broader social context by reviewing relevant academic literature, laws, and dominant cultural attitudes. Utilizing a symbolic-interactionist approach, and drawing on Goffman's concept of “stigma,” this thesis illustrates the unique challenges facing minor-attracted people. The study reveals that minor-attracted people become aware of their sexuality at an early age, experience stress caused by real or perceived societal rejection, and encounter both positive and negative reactions upon disclosing their identities. The conclusion underscores the need for a new approach to dealing with minor-attraction in contemporary Western society.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Sbts.Pdp 0207A 10563.Pdf (1.277Mb)
    Copyright © 2020 Benjamin Wallace Marshall All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. THE CHRISTIAN AND PEDOPHILIA: APPLYING BIBLICAL COUNSELING TO CHRISTIANS STRUGGLING WITH PEDOPHILIA __________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Educational Ministry __________________ by Benjamin Wallace Marshall December 2020 APPROVAL SHEET THE CHRISTIAN AND PEDOPHILIA: APPLYING BIBLICAL COUNSELING TO CHRISTIANS STRUGGLING WITH PEDOPHILIA Benjamin Wallace Marshall Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Robert K. Cheong (Faculty Supervisor) __________________________________________ Robert D. Jones Date______________________________ For the glory of God. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . vi PREFACE . vii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 Familiarity with the Literature . 4 Void in the Literature . 20 Thesis . 22 Outline of Chapters . 23 2. SECULAR PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TOWARD PEDOPHILIA . 26 Understanding Pedophilia . 26 Theories Regarding Pedophilia . 52 Assessment of Pedophilia. 66 Treatment of Pedophilia . 79 Summary of Secular Approach . 88 3. HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN APPROACH TOWARD PEDOPHILIA . 90 Roman Culture regarding Pederasty . 90 Early Church Fathers regarding Pederasty . 96 Christian Psychology and Pedophilia . 107 4. BIBLICAL COUNSELING APPROACH TOWARD PEDOPHILIA . 137 Definition of Biblical Counseling . 137 Pedophilic Origins . 150 iv Chapter Page Power of the Gospel . 165 Product of Gospel Regeneration . 172 5. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CHURCH: FOUR COMMITMENTS AND ONE CONSIDERATION . 176 Commitment to the Ordinary Means of Grace . 176 Commitment to Holiness . 180 Commitment to Community . 181 Commitment to Biblical Counseling .
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Pedophilia Seriously Margo Kaplan Rutgers School of Law - Camden
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 72 | Issue 1 Article 4 Winter 1-1-2015 Taking Pedophilia Seriously Margo Kaplan Rutgers School of Law - Camden Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Health Law and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Margo Kaplan, Taking Pedophilia Seriously, 72 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 75 (2015), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol72/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Taking Pedophilia Seriously Margo Kaplan* Abstract This Article pushes lawmakers, courts, and scholars to reexamine the concept of pedophilia in favor of a more thoughtful and coherent approach. Legal scholarship lacks a thorough and reasoned analysis of pedophilia. Its failure to carefully consider how the law should conceptualize sexual attraction to children undermines efforts to address the myriad of criminal, public health, and other legal concerns pedophilia raises. The result is an inconsistent mix of laws and policies based on dubious presumptions. These laws also increase risk of sexual abuse by isolating people living with pedophilia from treatment. The Article makes two central arguments: (1) although pedophilia does not fit neatly into any existing legal rubric, the concept of mental disorder best addresses the issues pedophilia raises; and (2) if the law conceptualizes pedophilia as a mental disorder, we must carefully reconsider how several areas of law address it.
    [Show full text]
  • Paraphilia - Wikipedia, the Freevisited Encyclopedia on 3/23/2016 Page 1 of 13
    Paraphilia - Wikipedia, the freevisited encyclopedia on 3/23/2016 Page 1 of 13 Paraphilia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Paraphilia (also known as sexual perversion and Paraphilia sexual deviation) is the Classification and external resources experience of intense Specialty Psychiatry sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, or ICD-10 F65 (http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2015/en#/F65) individuals.[1] No consensus has been found MeSH D010262 (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2016/MB_cgi? for any precise border field=uid&term=D010262) between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones.[2][3] There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The number and taxonomy of paraphilias is under debate; one source lists as many as 549 types of paraphilias.[4] The DSM-5 has specific listings for eight paraphilic disorders.[5] Several sub- classifications of the paraphilias have been proposed, and some argue that a fully dimensional, spectrum or complaint-oriented approach would better reflect the evidence.[6][7] Contents ◾ 1 Terminology ◾ 1.1 Homosexuality and non-heterosexuality ◾ 2Causes ◾ 3 Diagnosis ◾ 3.1 Typical versus atypical interests ◾ 3.2 Intensity and specificity ◾ 3.3 DSM-I and DSM-II ◾ 3.4 DSM-III through DSM-IV ◾ 3.5 DSM-IV-TR ◾ 3.6 DSM-5 ◾ 4 Management ◾ 5 Epidemiology ◾ 6 Legal issues ◾ 7 See also ◾ 8 References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia 3/23/2016 Paraphilia - Wikipedia, the freevisited encyclopedia on 3/23/2016 Page 2 of 13 ◾ 9 External links Terminology Many terms have been used to describe atypical sexual interests, and there remains debate regarding technical accuracy and perceptions of stigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Legal Document
    Case 7:16-cv-00108-O Document 26 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 919 PageID 467 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC., et al., No. 7:16-cv-00108 Plaintiffs, Appendix to Plaintiffs’ Brief v. in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary SYLVIA BURWELL, et al., Judgment or, in the Alternative, Defendants. Preliminary Injunction Respectfully submitted this the 21st day of October, 2016. /s/ Luke W. Goodrich Luke W. Goodrich Bar No. 977736DC Eric C. Rassbach (admission pending) Mark L. Rienzi (admission pending) Stephanie H. Barclay (admission pending) The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty 1200 New Hampshire Ave. NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 955-0095 (202) 955-0090 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs Christian Medical & Dental Associations, Franciscan Health, Inc., Specialty Physicians of Illinois, LLC Case 7:16-cv-00108-O Document 26 Filed 10/21/16 Page 2 of 919 PageID 468 TABLE OF CONTENTS App. Page 1. Franciscan Alliance Declaration of Sister Jane Marie Klein ................. 1 A. Franciscan Alliance Sex Reassignment Interventions Policy ......... 15 2. CMDA Declaration of Dr. David Stevens .............................................. 17 A. Ethics Statement on Transgender Identification ............................ 27 B. Endocrine Treatment of Transsexual Persons ................................. 34 C. Pasquino, Pucarelli, Accardo, Demiraj, Segni, & Nardo ................. 58 D. Singh .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drescher, 2009)
    Arch Sex Behav DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9531-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Queer Diagnoses: Parallels and Contrasts in the History of Homosexuality, Gender Variance, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Jack Drescher Ó American Psychiatric Association 2009 Abstract The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is Similarities and differences in the relationships of homo- in the process of revising its Diagnostic and Statistical Man- sexuality and gender identity to psychiatric and medical th- ual (DSM), with the DSM-V having an anticipated publica- inking are elucidated. Following a discussion of these issues, tion date of 2012. As part of that ongoing process, in May the author recommends changes in the DSM-V and some in- 2008, APA announced its appointment of the Work Group on ternal and public actions that the American Psychiatric Asso- Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders (WGSGID). The ann- ciation should take. ouncement generated a flurry of concerned and anxious res- ponses in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Keywords American Psychiatric Association Á DSM-V Á community, mostly focused on the status of the diagnostic Gender variance Á Gender identity disorder Á Homosexuality Á categories of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) (for both chil- Transgender dren and adolescents and adults). Activists argued, as in the case of homosexuality in the 1970s, that it is wrong to label expressions of gender variance as symptoms of a mental dis- order and that perpetuating DSM-IV-TR’s GID diagnoses in It was six men of Hindustan the DSM-V would further stigmatize and cause harm to trans- To learning much inclined, gender individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Paraphilias Including Paedophilia
    CREATING SAFE SPACES Understanding paraphilias including paedophilia WORKING FOR CHILD SAFETY AND GENDER EMPOWERMENT SINCE 2001 Establish class values ● We will be talking about sexuality, gender, pleasure, abuse and safety in these sessions. What will make this class a safe space for everyone to share, express their views and discuss freely? ● How do we want others to behave? ● How will we behave? CREATING SAFE SPACES enfoldindia.org Paraphilia - what is it? What’s true? 1. Paraphilias = unusual / atypical sexual behaviour 2. Paraphilia = mental disorder 3. Paraphilia = criminal sexual acts 4. Paraphilia = curable disease Paraphilia (n.) Greek para- "beside, aside" (see para- (1)) + philos "loving" (see -phile) CREATING SAFE SPACES enfoldindia.org Beliefs around paraphilia Prevailing socio- DSM Classification What is included cultural beliefs Sexual deviations prior to DSM-I are unlawful, "psychopathic personality criminal acts with pathologic sexuality" Sexual deviations DSM-I (1952) - personality DSM-I "homosexuality, transvestism, are a personality disorder of sociopathic pedophilia, fetishism, and sexual sadism, disorder - not subtype. - not symptomatic including rape, sexual assault, mutilation psychotic of more extensive syndromes like schizophrenia. DSM II sexual orientation disturbance The DSM-II (1968) - (homosexuality), fetishism, pedophilia, “personality disorders and transvestitism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, certain other nonpsychotic sadism, masochism, and "other sexual mental disorders.” deviation". Psychosexual DSM-III
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Current Transgender Theory on Children and Young People
    Implications of Current Transgender Theory on Children and Young People Terms While sex (male/ female) is an immutable biological reality, gender (masculinity/ femininity) is understood as a social construct which changes through history and according to societal norms. Conversely, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) who produce the guidance upon which NHS practice is based, describes gender identity as: ‘a category of social identity (that) refers to an individuals’ classification as male, female or occasionally some category other than male or female. It’s one’s deeply held sense of being male or female, some of both or neither, and does not always correspond to biological sex' 1 As such according the APA & NHS gender identity is unverifiable and yet considered to exist independent of both gendered socialisation and biological sex. There is no scientific basis for the idea of innate deeply-held sense of gender. Diagnosis Many people consider themselves to be transgender without a Gender Recognition Certificate and without undergoing legal, social or medical transition.2 The medical diagnosis of being transgender in adults and children is dependent upon not adhering to stereotypical gendered norms and / or a feeling of discomfort in one’s body.3 Statistics Historically children diagnosed with gender dysphoria were predominantly boys, consistent with the ratio for adult transsexuals which was 90% male in the late Sixties.4 Referral numbers of children were very small until around 2009 when they began to rise. Over the past six years the referral rate has increased by almost 1,000% and girls have overtaken boys.5 The Tavistock clinic for children and adolescents has seen referral increases of about 50% a year since 2010-11.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Homosexuality a Paraphilia? the Evidence for and Against
    Arch Sex Behav (2012) 41:237–247 DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-9900-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Is Homosexuality a Paraphilia? The Evidence For and Against James M. Cantor Published online: 27 January 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Whether homosexuality should be described as one because of perceived political implications. Atypical sexual among many paraphilic sexual interests or an altogether dif- interests remain highly stigmatized in Western society, espe- ferent dimension of sexual interest has long been discussed in cially in the United States. Homosexuality, more than any other terms of its political and social implications. The present article atypical sexual interest, has achieved greater social acceptance examined the question instead by comparing the major corre- over time, and advocates for other atypical sexual interests— lates and other features of homosexuality and of the paraphilias, BDSM, cross-dressing, diaperism, etc.—understandably seek including prevalence, sex ratio, onset and course, fraternal birth the same recognition and rights. Thus, thinking of paraphilias as order, physical height, handedness, IQ and cognitive neuro- merely another sexual orientation suggests the conclusion that psychological profile, and neuroanatomy. Although those lit- everyone with an atypical sexual interest should benefit from eratures remain underdeveloped, the existing findings thus far greater tolerance. (Conversely, there exist groups, typically con- suggest that homosexuality has a pattern of correlates largely, servative religious groups, who claim that only mainstream, non- but not entirely, distinct from that identified among the paraphi- paraphilic heterosexuality is acceptable, making any distinctions lias. At least, if homosexuality were deemed a paraphilia,it would among other sexual interests entirely moot.) be relatively unique among them, taxonometrically speaking.
    [Show full text]