DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological and Water Quality Study of the Little Miami River Basin, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological and Water Quality Study of the Little Miami River Basin, 1998 MAS/1999-12-3 Little Miami River Basin TSD June 21, 2000 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Little Miami River Basin, 1998 Clark, Greene, Montgomery, Warren, Clermont, and Hamilton Counties June 21, 2000 OEPA Technical Report Number MAS/1999-12-3 Bob Taft, Governor Chris Jones, Director State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1049, Lazarus Government Center 122 S. Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 MAS/1999-12-3 Little Miami River Basin TSD June 21, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE TO USERS ......................................................xxiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................xxv FORWARD .............................................................xxvi INTRODUCTION ........................................................1 SUMMARY .............................................................2 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................3 Little Miami River Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................3 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................4 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................4 Upper LMR Tributaries Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................4 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................6 Future Monitoring Concerns and Other Recommendations ..................6 Massie Creek Subbasin Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................6 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................6 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................6 Beaver Creek Subbasin Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................6 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................7 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................7 Glady Run Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................7 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................7 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................7 Caesar Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................8 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................8 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................8 Anderson Fork Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................8 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................8 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................8 North Branch Caesar Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................9 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................9 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................9 ii MAS/1999-12-3 Little Miami River Basin TSD June 21, 2000 South Branch Caesar Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................9 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................9 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................9 Miscellaneous Tributaries in the Caesar Creek Basin Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................9 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................10 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................10 Todd Fork and East Fork Todd Fork Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................10 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................10 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................10 Lytle Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................10 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................10 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................11 Cowan Creek and Indian Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................11 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................11 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................11 Turtle Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................11 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................11 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................11 Muddy Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................12 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................12 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................12 Simpson Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................12 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................12 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................12 O’Bannon Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................12 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................12 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................13 Sycamore Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................13 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................13 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................13 Aquatic Life Use Attainment Table ........................................14 Use Designations Table .................................................26 iii MAS/1999-12-3 Little Miami River Basin TSD June 21, 2000 STUDY AREA ..........................................................31 METHODS .............................................................44 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Pollutant Loadings and NPDES Discharger Descriptions ....................48 Air Borne Express (ABX) .............................................48 Village of Blanchester WWTP .........................................48 Clermont County Miami Trails ........................................52 Clermont County O’Bannon Creek WWTP ...............................54 Clermont County Wards Corner WWTP .................................56 Greene County Clifton WWTP .........................................56 Greene County Cedarville WWTP ......................................57 Greene County Beaver Creek WWTP ...................................60 Greene County Sugar Creek WWTP ....................................63 Hamilton County Polk Run WWTP .....................................66 Hamilton County Sycamore Creek .....................................69 Jamestown WWTP ..................................................72 City of Lebannon WWTP .............................................72 City of Mason WWTP ................................................76 Montgomery County East Regional WWTP ...............................79 Village of South Charleston WWTP .....................................82 Totes Inc. .........................................................84 Warren County Lower LMR WWTP .....................................85 Village of Waynesville WWTP .........................................87 City of Wilmington WWTP ............................................90 City of Xenia-Ford Road WWTP .......................................92 City of Xenia-Glady Run WWTP .......................................95 City of Yellow Springs WWTP .........................................99 Spills ...............................................................111 Fish Kills ............................................................111 Surface Water Quality ................................................112 Little Miami River ..................................................112 Gilroy Ditch .......................................................142 Lisbon Fork .......................................................146 North Fork Little Miami River .........................................146 Goose Creek .......................................................147 Yellow Springs Creek ................................................147 Jacoby Branch .....................................................148 Conner Branch .....................................................148 Massie Creek ......................................................154 North Fork Massie Creek .............................................159 South Fork Massie Creek .............................................159 Clark Run .........................................................162 iv MAS/1999-12-3 Little Miami River Basin TSD June 21, 2000 Oldtown Creek .....................................................165 Ludlow Creek ......................................................165 Shawnee Creek .....................................................165 Beaver Creek ......................................................168 Little Beaver Creek .................................................171 Trib to L. Beaver Creek ..............................................174 Sugar Creek and Little Sugar Creek ....................................175 Tribs to LMR mainstem @ RMs 69.85, 62.01, and 60.05 ....................178 Glady Run ........................................................181 Mill Run and Newman Run ...........................................184 Caesar Creek ......................................................184 North Branch Caesar Creek ..........................................189 South Branch Caesar Creek ...........................................190 Anderson Fork .....................................................195 Painters
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archaeological Modeling Study
    Draft Report Archaeological Modeling for Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02) G R AY & PA P E , I N C. ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION January 14, 2009 Submitted for: ENTRAN 1848 Summit Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Submitted by: Gray & Pape, Inc. 1318 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Gray & Pape Project No. 08-11401 Project No. 08-11401 Archaeological Modeling for Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02) Submitted to: ENTRAN 1848 Summit Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 (513) 761-1700 Contact: Deb Osborne Submitted by: Michael Striker, M.A., RPA Gray & Pape, Inc. 1318 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Tel: (513) 287-7700 __________________________ W. Kevin Pape Project Manager January 14, 2009 ABSTRACT Under contract to ENTRAN, Gray & Pape, Inc. has prepared recommendations concerning the archaeological potential of Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02), located in Hamilton and Clermont Counties, Ohio. The recommendations are based on a model developed by Gray & Pape, Inc. using the results of previous work conducted for the project (Weed 2002), documentary research, interviews with landowners and other knowledgeable parties, and an informal reconnaissance of the project area. Gray & Pape, Inc. divided the project area into three zones: Zone 1 is the undeveloped floodplains and terraces of the Little Miami River. Zone 2 includes floodplains and terraces that have been developed in historical times, and Zone 3 includes the valley and uplands east of the Village of Newtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Pollution Potential of Washington County, Ohio
    GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OHIO BY MICHAEL P. ANGLE, JOSH JONAK, AND DAVE WALKER GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL REPORT NO. 55 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER WATER RESOURCES SECTION 2002 ABSTRACT A ground water pollution potential map of Washington County has been prepared using the DRASTIC mapping process. The DRASTIC system consists of two major elements: the designation of mappable units, termed hydrogeologic settings, and the superposition of a relative rating system for pollution potential. Hydrogeologic settings incorporate hydrogeologic factors that control ground water movement and occurrence including depth to water, net recharge, aquifer media, soil media, topography, impact of the vadose zone media, and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. These factors, which form the acronym DRASTIC, are incorporated into a relative ranking scheme that uses a combination of weights and ratings to produce a numerical value called the ground water pollution potential index. Hydrogeologic settings are combined with the pollution potential indexes to create units that can be graphically displayed on a map. Ground water pollution potential analysis in Washington County resulted in a map with symbols and colors, which illustrate areas of varying ground water pollution potential indexes ranging from 56 to 187. Washington County lies within the Nonglaciated Central hydrogeologic setting. The buried valley underlying the present Muskingum River and Ohio River basins contain sand and gravel outwash which are capable of yielding up to 500 gallons per minute (gpm) from properly designed, large diameter wells. Smaller tributaries contain only thin, fine-grained alluvial/lacustrine deposits commonly yielding less than 5 gpm.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
    [Show full text]
  • East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio
    25 February 1971 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT East Fork Lake East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Louisville Louisville, Kentucky DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOUISVILLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P O BOX 5 9 LOUISVILLE KENTUCKY 40201 25 February 1971 Revised 26 March 1971 SUMMARY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT EAST FORK LAKE EAST FORK MIAMI RIVER, OHIO 1. Coordination With Other Agencies. Date of Date of AGENCY Request Comment s Soil Conservation Service USDA 9 Oct 1970 27 Oct 1970 Federal Water Quality Administration, EPA 9 Oct 1970 4 Jan 1971 Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wild­ life, USD I 9 Oct 1970 28 Oct 1970 Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, USDI 9 Oct 1970 No comments received National Park Service, USDI 10 Sept 1970 22 Sept 1970 9 Oct 1970 Ohio Department of Natural Resources 9 Oct 1970 23 Nov 1970 Ohio Planning and Development Clearinghouse 14 Oct 1970 23 Nov 1970 Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Planning Authority (Comments furnished by Clermont County Planning Commission at request of O-K-I) 14 Oct 1970 16 Nov 1970 ORLPD-F East Fork Miami River, Ohio 2 * Environmental Impacts. Approximately 10,600 acres of land will be required for the project, with 2,160 acres of water surface at seasonal pool elevation. The ecology of the area would be modified to adjust to the slack water impoundment. Environment downstream would be enhanced by flood control, water quality control, and water supply. Agricultural lands will be inundated. Urbanization of the area can be expected to increase rapidly. 3 * Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of August and September 2004 in Eastern Ohio: FEMA Disaster Declaration 1556
    Floods of August and September 2004 in Eastern Ohio: FEMA Disaster Declaration 1556 By Andrew D. Ebner, David E. Straub, and Jonathan D. Lageman In cooperation with the Ohio Emergency Management Agency Open-File Report 2008–1291 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ebner, A.D., Straub, D.E., and Lageman, J.D., 2008, Floods of August and September 2004 in eastern Ohio— FEMA Disaster Declaration 1556: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1291, 104 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ADAMS 242 - XXX D ELLISON MEMORIAL PARK VILLAGE OF PEEBLES $74,000.00 C 3/7/1973 12/31/1975 2 ADAMS County Total: $74,000.00 County Count: 1 ALLEN 580 - XXX A STRAYER WOODS ACQUISITION JOHNNY APPLESEED METRO PARK DIST. $111,500.00 C 12/6/1977 12/31/1979 4 819 - XXX D OTTAWA RIVER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LIMA $45,045.00 C 3/21/1980 12/31/1984 4 913 - XXX D VILLAGE PARK VILLAGE OF SPENCERVILLE $11,265.00 C 7/28/1981 12/31/1986 4 ALLEN County Total: $167,810.00 County Count: 3 ASHLAND 93 - XXX D MOHICAN STATE PARK SWIMMING POOL DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES $102,831.30 C 4/23/1971 6/30/1972 16 463 - XXX D MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CITY OF ASHLAND $144,615.70 C 4/7/1976 12/31/1978 16 573 - XXX A BROOKSIDE PARK EXPANSION CITY OF ASHLAND $45,325.00 C 11/10/1977 12/31/1979 16 742 - XXX D LEWIS MEMORIAL TENNIS COURTS VILLAGE OF JEROMESVILLE $4,715.00 C 5/2/1979 12/31/1983 16 807 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK CITY OF ASHLAND $200,300.00 C 7/14/1980 12/31/1985 16 953 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK III CITY OF ASHLAND $269,669.98 C 6/14/1983 12/31/1988 16 1159 - XXX D BROOKSIDE WEST CITY OF ASHLAND $154,500.00 C 7/11/1990 12/31/1995 16 ASHLAND County Total: $921,956.98 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Ohio Trail
    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: the Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20)
    PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: The Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20) S.R. 0224, Section L02 State Street Bridge Replacement Project Mahoning Township, Lawrence County, Pennsylvania ER #1999-6092-073 Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 11-0 45 Thomas Run Road Bridgeville, Pennsylvania 15017 Submitted by: A.D. Marble & Company 100 Gamma Drive Suite 203 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures................................................................................................................................. ii List of Photographs........................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY........................................1 A. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 B. Project Setting................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Clean Ohio Trails Fund Recipients
    2 0 1 9 C l e a n O h i o T r a i l s F u n d A w a r d s County City/Village Applicant Project Total Project COTF Funding Proposal Costs Ashtabula Ashtabula County Pymatuning valley $2,124,982.00 $500,000.00 The Pymatuning Valley Greenway Trail Phase 1.1 is a Metroparks Greenway Trail 3.51 mile multi-use trail in southwestern Ashtabula County, which is the initial phase of a regionally significant trail that will connect Ashtabula County and the Western Reserve Greenway Trail to Jamestown, PA and Clarion, PA. The trail itself will be designed to be off-road, paved, 10-feet-wide. Clean Ohio Trails Fund assistance will fund the construction, design, and engineering phases of this project. Clinton City of Wilmington Clarksville Connection- $2,022,601.00 $500,000.00 This project will extend the Luther Warren Peace Path Phase I Trail 3.5 miles from the existing terminus at Nelson Avenue in the City of Wilmington to Beechgrove Road and Ogden Road in Union Township as the first step towards developing a trail to connect to the Little Miami Trail in Warren County. Clean Ohio Trails Fund assistance will fund the construction phase of this project. Columbiana Columbiana County Little Beaver Creek $156,596.00 $117,447.00 The project will allow for the construction of 3.1 miles of a Park District Greenway Trail-Lincoln combination of bike lanes and bike trail along State Route Street Connector 154, east of Lisbon, to an existing park and ride near State Route 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Loading Analysis Information Mohican River Watershed
    Appendix Mohican River Watershed TMDLs D LOADING ANALYSIS INFORMATION MOHICAN RIVER WATERSHED D1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 D1.1 Report Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 D2 Linkage Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 8 D2.1 How the Identified Stressors Lead to Impaired Uses.......................................................... 8 D2.2 Direct Linkage ..................................................................................................................... 8 D2.2.1 Justification for Using Nitrate and Nitrite for the Brubaker Cr. TMDL .................. 9 D2.3 Justification for the Use of Surrogates ............................................................................. 10 D2.3.1 Headwaters Black Fork Mohican River (05040002 01 02) ................................... 10 D2.3.2 Shipp Creek Black Fork Mohican River (05040002 01 05) and Village of Pavonia- Black Fork Mohican River (05040002 02 01) ....................................................... 12 D2.3.3 Village of Pavonia-Black Fork Mohican River (05040002 02 01) ......................... 12 D2.3.4 Charles Mill-Black Fork Mohican River (05040002 02 05) ................................... 12 D2.3.5 Lower Muddy Fork Mohican River (05040002 05 03) ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow Simulations of the Great Miami River Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio
    Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow Simulations of the Great Miami River Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio By Rodney A. Sheets Section 7 of Hydrogeologic Settings and Ground-Water Flow Simulations for Regional Studies of the Transport of Anthropogenic and Natural Contaminants to Public-Supply Wells—Studies Begun in 2001 Edited by Suzanne S. Paschke Professional Paper 1737–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, SECRETARY U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Sheets, R.A., 2007, Hydrogeologic setting and ground-water flow simulations of the Great Miami Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio, section 7 of Paschke, S.S., ed., THydrogeologic settings and ground-water flow simulations for regional studies of the transport of anthropogenic and natural contaminants to public-supply wells—studies begun in 2001: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1737–A, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI VALLEY BIKEWAYS235 TWP 200 East Liberty 33
    47 BELLEFONTAINE 292 47 CARTER 33 UNION NOTE: LOGAN COUNTY END Southview CHIP AND 47 Park SEAL SURFACE. MIAMI VALLEY BIKEWAYS235 TWP 200 East Liberty 33 TWP 199 Liberty Hills Golf TWP 190 Club The Nation's Largest Paved Trail Network TWP 249 68 3 OH 508 Owens Fen MiamiValleyTrails.org State Nature Preserve Piatt N O R T H West Castles Liberty 287 559 OH 245 245 Ohio 245 Caverns LOGAN COUNTY 47 507 Versailles 235 CHAMPAIGN COUNTY Mad River Ansonia UPPER Market VALLEY DARKE COUNTY 185 SHELBY COUNTY SHELBY COUNTY 245 Kiser Lake Mad River 296 MIAMI COUNTY 66 JOHNSTON FARM Wilderness State Park Area & INDIAN AGENCY r e 17 iv 48 Mia m i R 29 LIPPINCOTT 68 Urbana eat Wilderness r Area G 127 Roadside 118 121 Park 589 HERR 185 25 Edison State Community PURK RIVERSIDE College SNYDER 36 CHAMPAIGN COUNTY 36 MILLERSTOWN-ERIS HANNA CODDINGTON Stillwater Lock 9 PIQUA-CLAYTON MT. PLEASANT CEMETERY Prairie SPIKER Park CROMES OH 296 NOTE: Reserve SUNSET TROY-SIDNEY 36 BEGIN 296 CROMES CHIP AND French RIVER Bradford GLE Park LOONEY SEAL IN CASSTOWN-SIDNEY Fletcher MAIN HIGH 36 SURFACE. COVINGTON-BRANDFORD MCMAKEN 49 36 SPIKER Piqua STATLER Darke County Lake PEARL Gettysburg NEW HARRISION-BRADFORD MIAMI WALNUT Temporary Wildlife Area PARK MILLERSTOWN 7 BISH DISCOVERY BUCKNECK Road Route 75 Garbry’s Big RIVER BRIDGE Goodrich- N. OAKLAND CENTER 36 Piqua detail map Giles Park Woods Y 36 MAIN Reserve & 36 571 Temporary Covington on reverse side URBANA 814 Road Route Sanctuary St. Paris 36 E. LAWN 36 MAIN PETERSON COVINGTON-GETTYSBURG Melvin Miller Park 36 Greenville N.MAIN UNION SPIDEL HAHN WILLIS Farrington N.
    [Show full text]