DOCSLIB.ORG

H:\TMDL\Projects\In Progress\Little Beaver Creek\Final for Usepa\Little

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H:\TMDL\Projects\In Progress\Little Beaver Creek\Final for Usepa\Little State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Little Beaver Creek Watershed Final Report August 17, 2005 Bob Taft, Governor Joseph P. Koncelik, Director CONTENTS TABLES .............................................................................. ii FIGURES..............................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................. iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2.0 IDENTIFICATION OF WATERBODY, POLLUTANT OF CONCERN, POLLUTANT SOURCES, AND PRIORITY RANKING ................................................. 6 2.1 Identification of Waterbody and Description of the Watershed .............................. 6 2.2 Previous Studies ................................................................. 11 2.3 Pollutants of Concern............................................................. 11 2.4 Pollutant Sources ................................................................ 12 2.5 Priority Ranking ................................................................. 13 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS, NUMERIC WATER QUALITY TARGETS, AND EXISTING WATER QUALITY ............................... 14 3.1 Biocriteria...................................................................... 14 3.2 Numeric Water Quality Targets ..................................................... 15 3.2.1 Total Phosphorus ............................................................ 16 3.2.2 Organic Enrichment/Dissolved Oxygen .......................................... 17 3.2.3 Ammonia.................................................................. 17 3.2.4 Fecal Coliform .............................................................. 18 3.2.5 Manganese................................................................. 19 3.2.6 Siltation ................................................................... 19 3.2.7 Total Dissolved Solids........................................................ 20 3.3 Existing Water Quality ............................................................ 21 3.3.1 Total Phosphorus ............................................................ 21 3.3.2 Ammonia.................................................................. 22 3.3.3 Siltation ................................................................... 22 3.3.4 Fecal Coliform .............................................................. 23 3.3.5 Manganese................................................................. 23 3.3.6 Total Dissolved Solids........................................................ 24 4.0TECHNICAL APPROACH........................................................... 25 4.1 The Generalized Watershed Loading Functions (GWLF) Model............................ 25 4.2 Load Duration Curve ............................................................. 26 4.3 GWLF Strengths and Weaknesses ................................................... 26 4.4 Load Duration Curve Strengths and Weaknesses ........................................ 27 4.5 Critical Conditions ............................................................... 27 5.0ALLOCATIONS.................................................................... 28 5.1 Total Phosphorus TMDLs .......................................................... 28 5.2 Ammonia TMDLs................................................................ 30 5.3 TDS TMDLs.................................................................... 30 5.4 Siltation TMDLs ................................................................. 31 5.5 Fecal Coliform TMDLs ........................................................... 32 5.5.1 Stone Mill Run .............................................................. 33 i 5.5.2 East Branch of the Middle Fork Little Beaver Creek ................................ 34 5.5.3 Brush Creek................................................................ 35 5.5.4 Little Beaver Creek, Leslie Run/East Palestine Area Streams .......................... 36 5.5.5 Honey Creek/New Middleton Area Streams....................................... 37 5.6 Summary....................................................................... 38 6.0 WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS ....................................................... 39 7.0 MARGIN OF SAFETY .............................................................. 41 8.0 SEASONAL VARIATION ............................................................ 42 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING .............................................. 43 9.1 Reasonable Assurances............................................................ 43 9.1.1. Minimum Elements of an Approvable Implementation Plan.......................... 43 9.1.1.1 Reasonable Assurances Summary ......................................... 43 9.1.1.2 Implementation Actions, Time line, and Reasonable Assurances ................. 44 9.1.2 Expected Effectiveness of Example Restoration Scenario ............................ 55 9.2 Process for Monitoring and Revision ................................................. 56 10.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .......................................................... 57 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................. 58 APPENDIX A—Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium Data Description ........ A-1 APPENDIX B—Little Beaver Creek Attainment Table ........................................ B-1 APPENDIX C—Development of Watershed Loading Model.................................... C-1 APPENDIX D—Regression Analysis ...................................................... D-1 APPENDIX E—Fecal Coliform Data Used to Create Load Duration Curves ....................... E-1 APPENDIX F—Responsiveness Summary to Public Comments ..................................F-1 TABLES Table 1-1. Ohio 2002 Section 303(d) listing information for the Little Beaver Creek watershed ......... 3 Table 1-2. Ohio 2004 Section 303(d) listing information for the Little Beaver Creek watershed ......... 3 Table 1-3. Little Beaver Creek impairments addressed by the TMDLs in this report .................. 4 Table 2-1. State and Federal Wild and Scenic river designated areas for the Little Beaver Creek watershed.............................................................. 7 Table 2-2. Land use within the Little Beaver Creek watershed ................................... 8 Table 2-3. Industrial facilities and wastewater treatment plants in the Little Beaver Creek watershed .... 13 Table 3-1. Ohio water quality standards ................................................... 14 Table 3-2. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life that apply within the Little Beaver Creek watershed .................................................................. 15 Table 3-3. Statewide total phosphorus targets for Ohio rivers and streams ......................... 17 Table 3-4. Ohio’s numeric criteria for dissolved oxygen....................................... 17 Table 3-5. Fecal coliform and E. coli standards for Ohio ...................................... 18 Table 3-6. Total phosphorus data summary for Little Beaver Creek WWH headwater streams ......... 21 ii Table 3-7. Total phosphorus data summary for Little Beaver Creek WWH wadeable streams .......... 21 Table 3-8. Ammonia data summary for Little Beaver Creek streams ............................. 22 Table 3-9. Total suspended solids data summary for Little Beaver Creek streams ................... 22 Table 3-10. Fecal coliform data summary for Little Beaver Creek streams ......................... 23 Table 3-11. Manganese data summary for Patterson Run ....................................... 23 Table 3-12. Summary of Middle Fork Little Beaver Creek (Salem area) TDS data ................... 24 Table 5-1. Total phosphorus TMDL annual allocation summary table for the Little Beaver Creek watershed ............................................................. 29 Table 5-2. Ammonia TMDL annual allocation summary table for the Little Beaver Creek watershed . 30 Table 5-3. Sediment (siltation) TMDL annual allocation summary table for the Little Beaver Creek watershed .................................................................. 31 Table 5-4. Fecal coliform load duration analysis for Stone Mill Run ............................. 33 Table 5-5. Fecal coliform load duration analysis for East Branch ................................ 34 Table 5-6. Fecal coliform load duration analysis for Brush Creek ............................... 35 Table 5-7. Fecal coliform load duration analysis for Leslie Run ................................. 36 Table 5-8. Fecal coliform load duration analysis for Honey Creek ............................... 37 Table 5-9. Summary of TMDLs developed for the Little Beaver Creek watershed .................. 38 Table 6-1. Total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the NPDES facilities in the Little Beaver Creek watershed .................................................................. 39 Table 6-2. Ammonia wasteload allocations for the NPDES facilities in the Little Beaver Creek watershed 40 Table 9-1 Description of implementation actions and measures. ................................ 51 Table 9-2. Time line and reasonable assurances. ............................................. 53 Table 9-3. Time line: monitoring, tracking and implementation. ...............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: the Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20)
    PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: The Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20) S.R. 0224, Section L02 State Street Bridge Replacement Project Mahoning Township, Lawrence County, Pennsylvania ER #1999-6092-073 Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 11-0 45 Thomas Run Road Bridgeville, Pennsylvania 15017 Submitted by: A.D. Marble & Company 100 Gamma Drive Suite 203 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures................................................................................................................................. ii List of Photographs........................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY........................................1 A. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 B. Project Setting................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Clean Ohio Trails Fund Recipients
    2 0 1 9 C l e a n O h i o T r a i l s F u n d A w a r d s County City/Village Applicant Project Total Project COTF Funding Proposal Costs Ashtabula Ashtabula County Pymatuning valley $2,124,982.00 $500,000.00 The Pymatuning Valley Greenway Trail Phase 1.1 is a Metroparks Greenway Trail 3.51 mile multi-use trail in southwestern Ashtabula County, which is the initial phase of a regionally significant trail that will connect Ashtabula County and the Western Reserve Greenway Trail to Jamestown, PA and Clarion, PA. The trail itself will be designed to be off-road, paved, 10-feet-wide. Clean Ohio Trails Fund assistance will fund the construction, design, and engineering phases of this project. Clinton City of Wilmington Clarksville Connection- $2,022,601.00 $500,000.00 This project will extend the Luther Warren Peace Path Phase I Trail 3.5 miles from the existing terminus at Nelson Avenue in the City of Wilmington to Beechgrove Road and Ogden Road in Union Township as the first step towards developing a trail to connect to the Little Miami Trail in Warren County. Clean Ohio Trails Fund assistance will fund the construction phase of this project. Columbiana Columbiana County Little Beaver Creek $156,596.00 $117,447.00 The project will allow for the construction of 3.1 miles of a Park District Greenway Trail-Lincoln combination of bike lanes and bike trail along State Route Street Connector 154, east of Lisbon, to an existing park and ride near State Route 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow Simulations of the Great Miami River Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio
    Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow Simulations of the Great Miami River Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio By Rodney A. Sheets Section 7 of Hydrogeologic Settings and Ground-Water Flow Simulations for Regional Studies of the Transport of Anthropogenic and Natural Contaminants to Public-Supply Wells—Studies Begun in 2001 Edited by Suzanne S. Paschke Professional Paper 1737–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, SECRETARY U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Sheets, R.A., 2007, Hydrogeologic setting and ground-water flow simulations of the Great Miami Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio, section 7 of Paschke, S.S., ed., THydrogeologic settings and ground-water flow simulations for regional studies of the transport of anthropogenic and natural contaminants to public-supply wells—studies begun in 2001: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1737–A, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Miami River Designation
    Little Miami Scenic River Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Watercraft 2045 Morse Road Building A Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693 In this document: Water Quality ..................................................................2 Little Miami River Designation .................................2 Scenic River Designation ...........................................3 Help Protect Ohio’s Scenic Rivers ............................3 Paddling Safety ..............................................................4 Paddling Access Chart ............................................5-6 Paddling Access Map ............................................ 7-11 Little Miami River Visit the ODNR Division of Watercraft web page at watercraft.ohiodnr.gov or call 1.877.4BOATER (Ohio only) for more information An Equal Opportunity Employer 1-800-750-0750 or 711 for use with TTD/TTY The Ohio Department of Natural Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of services. watercraft.ohiodnr.gov/LittleMiamiSR 1 of 11 September 2012 Water Quality Little Miami River Designation he Little Miami River is one of Ohio’s highest quality ell before legislation was passed creating wild, scenic, and Triver systems with exceptional water quality and Wrecreational rivers, there was state and local interest in biological diversity. The Ohio Environmental Protection protecting the Little Miami River. In an effort to determine the Agency (OEPA) has recorded 78 fish species from the system potential of including the Little Miami in a national system of including 3 state-endangered and 2 state-threatened species. designated rivers, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Historically, 36 species of unionid mollusks have been recorded with the encouragement of local organizations, asked the Ohio from the Little Miami including 1 federally-endangered, University Planning Institute in March 1966 to study both the 5 state-endangered, and 2 state-threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo-Magazine-Fall-Fly-Fishing.Pdf
    TOLEDO MAGAZINE toledoBlade.com THE BLADE, TOLEDO, OHIO SUNDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2011 SECTION B, PAGE 6 THE OUTDOORS PAGE !7BB<BO<?I>?D= on the scenic Little Beaver Creek BLADE WATERCOLOR/JEFF BASTING PHOTOS BY MIKE MAINHART By STEVE POLLICK and JEFF BASTING t is time well-spent, flycasting bald eagle, an osprey, and, around for smallmouth bass on a re- the next bend, two deer, wading, Imote, wild, scenic stream on one of them a nice buck. This is a a sunny autumn day. place to lose track of time. The surprising thing is that here It is not easy wading over the cob- on Little Beaver Creek, it is so wild, ble for hours, but too soon the sun- so quiet, so remote that you wonder shot shadows are getting long and whether you actually are in Ohio. you realize that you are a steady, 45- Hard by the Pennsylvania line on minute hike from the Jeep, follow- the eastern border of Ohio, 36 miles ing an old mule towpath. Tracing it of the Little Beaver system comprise is a godsend when you are hungry a state and national wild and scenic and tired and want to “get back.” river. A 2,722-acre state park named The raised path was used in the for the creek is a good place for an 1830s and 1840s by muleskinners outing, the bridges at its upper and prodding teams that pulled tow- lower ends making nice bookends boats through the 90 locks of the 73- for a day astream. mile-long Sandy and Beaver Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Rivers 50Th Anniversary Celebration Is June 10 Ashtabula County Has More Scenic Rivers Than Any Other Ohio County
    For Immediate Release Scenic Rivers 50th Anniversary Celebration is June 10 Ashtabula County has more Scenic Rivers than any other Ohio county • Contact: Ashtabula County Board of Commissioners, 576-3750 or Metroparks, 576-0717; Mathew Smith, ODNR, 440-225-5582 • Logo, photos of Ashtabula County scenic rivers available; email [email protected] • Sidebar of river-related events follows feature JEFFERSON—Fifty years ago, the Ohio Legislature became the first state to pass a Scenic Rivers Act, thus foreshadowing The Federal Scenic Rivers legislation by several months. Since then, 14 Ohio river systems have been designated state scenic rivers by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR). With three of those streams in Ashtabula County, it is fitting that a celebration be held this year to mark passage of the legislation and the resulting benefits. That event is scheduled for June 10 at the Harpersfield Covered Bridge Metropark on the Grand River. The celebration will be from 1 to 4 p.m. and is free and open to the public with activities for all ages. “Ashtabula County is blessed with having three rivers that have been designated “scenic” in the state of Ohio. This is a true testament to the many natural resources that we have to enjoy here in our backyard. I encourage our county residents to take a moment to explore the many natural treasures that we have here throughout Ashtabula County,” said County Commissioner Casey Kozlowski. “I am thankful we have taken such an effort to preserve and appreciate our rivers. I walk the Ashtabula River often with my kids and enjoy the beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Booklet
    2019 Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory March 2019 2019 Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Fish for Your Health: Overall Advice on Fish Consumption .................................................................................................. 4 Fish: A Healthy Part of Your Diet ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Choose Better Fish .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 “Do Not Eat” Advisories ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Serving Size ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Prepare it Healthy .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Sensitive Populations ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Bowyer Little Beaver Creek Stream Analysis
    Assessing the Effects of Land Use on Little Beaver Creek Water Quality Using Macroinvertebrates Kayla Bowyer College of Natural and Health Sciences University of Mount Union Introduction Results Discussion Little Beaver Creek (LBC) in All three sites were found to Columbiana County, Ohio is a State and Table 1: Stream biodiversity and water quality using data be healthy and following the trends of Federal Scenic River (Ohio EPA 2019). collected from Surber Sampler ODNR’s sampling from 2007 to 2016. Due to this categorization, this river is Sites Average Total Number of Average Cumulative Stream H Species Simpson’s Index Value Quality In particular, the findings regarding LR under constant monitoring to the protect the Index of contradicted previous research that Diversity river from sources of pollution. The Salem (Teagarden 0.701 8 0.372 17 Good (17-22) states that urban streams are under the purpose of this study was to determine if Covered Bridge) highest pressure (Lenat and Crawford Beaver Creek 1.420 10 0.660 17 Good (17-22) this river was affected by surrounding land State Park 1994). TCB and BCSP were well use, specifically agricultural and urban uses East Palestine 1.187 13 0.498 22 Excellent buffered sites, resulting in their high (Leslie Run) (>22) using macroinvertebrate analysis. biodiversity and CIV scores. Materials and Methods Table 2: Stream biodiversity and water quality using data The Hester Dendy traps Three sites were chosen based on collected from Hester Dendy traps resulted in similar CIV scores for the surrounding land use: Sites Average Total Number Average Cumulative Stream sites, with LR having the highest H of Species Simpson’s Index Value Quality • Teagarden Covered Bridge (TCB), Index of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT SUBJECT to CHANGE Page 1 of 43
    NPDES Permit No.: OHQ000004 Page 1 of 43 DRAFT SUBJECT TO CHANGE Page 1 of 43 NPDES Permit No.: OHQ000004 Issuance Date: Effective Date: Expiration Date: OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUTHORIZATION FOR SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et. seq. hereafter referred to as "the Act"), and the Ohio Water Pollution Control Act (Ohio Revised Code Chapter 6111), dischargers of storm water from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, as defined in Part VI of this permit, are authorized by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, hereafter referred to as "Ohio EPA," to discharge from the outfalls and to the receiving surface waters of the state identified in their Notices of Intent (NOI) Application form on file with Ohio EPA in accordance with the conditions specified in this permit. This permit includes all required permit terms and conditions in the general permit and has been issued under the Comprehensive General Permit approach in accordance with Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-38- 02(B)(4)(a). It has been determined that a lowering of water quality of various waters of the state associated with granting coverage under this permit is necessary to accommodate important social and economic development in the state of Ohio. In accordance with OAC 3745-1-05, this decision was reached only after examining a series of technical alternatives, reviewing social and economic issues related to the degradation, and considering all public and intergovernmental comments received concerning the proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA List of Special Waters April 2014
    ist of Ohio’s Special Waters, As of 4/16/2014 Water Body Name - SegmenL ting Description Hydrologic Unit Special Flows Into Drainage Basin Code(s) (HUC) Category* Alum Creek - headwaters to West Branch (RM 42.8) 05060001 Big Walnut Creek Scioto SHQW 150 Anderson Fork - Grog Run (RM 11.02) to the mouth 05090202 Caesar Creek Little Miami SHQW 040 Archers Fork Little Muskingum River Central Ohio SHQW 05030201 100 Tributaries Arney Run - Black Run (RM 1.64) to the mouth 05030204 040 Clear Creek Hocking SHQW Ashtabula River - confluence of East and West Fork (RM 27.54) Lake Erie Ashtabula SHQW, State to East 24th street bridge (RM 2.32) 04110003 050 Scenic river Auglaize River - Kelly Road (RM 77.32) to Jennings Creek (RM Maumee River Maumee SHQW 47.02) 04100007 020 Auglaize River – Jennings Creek (RM 47.02) to Ottawa River (RM Maumee River Maumee Species 33.26) Aukerman Creek Twin Creek Great Miami Species Aurora Branch - State Route 82 (RM 17.08) to the mouth Chagrin River Chagrin OSW-E, State 04110003 020 Scenic river Bantas Fork Twin Creek Great Miami OSW-E 05080002 040 Baughman Creek 04110004 010 Grand River Grand SHQW Beech Fork 05060002 Salt Creek Scioto SHQW 070 Bend Fork – Packsaddle run (RM 9.7) to the mouth 05030106 110 Captina Creek Central Ohio SHQW Tributaries Big Darby Creek Scioto River Scioto OSW-E 05060001 190, 05060001 200, 05060001 210, 05060001 220 Big Darby Creek – Champaign-Union county line to U.S. route Scioto River Scioto State Scenic 40 bridge, northern boundary of Battelle-Darby Creek metro river park to mouth Big Darby Creek – Champaign-Union county line to Conrail Scioto River Scioto National Wild railroad trestle (0.9 miles upstream of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio Erin Lee Kingdom Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Biology Commons Repository Citation Kingdom, Erin Lee, "An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio" (2011). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 466. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/466 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EVALUATION OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF RARE AND COMMON DARTERS IN OHIO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By ERIN LEE KINGDOM B.S., Wright State University, 2004 2011 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES June 20, 2011 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Erin L. Kingdom ENTITLED An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science Yvonne Vadeboncoeur, Ph.D. Thesis Director David Goldstein, Ph. D. Department Chair of Biological Sciences Committee on Final Examination Yvonne Vadeboncoeur, Ph.D. James Runkle, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]