DOCSLIB.ORG

Myoporum Turbinatum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myoporum Turbinatum Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations/assessments under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only for Assessment) Species name (scientific and common name): Myoporum turbinatum Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Deletion Nominated conservation category and criteria: N/A Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction • B. Geographic range • C. Small population size and • decline D. Very small or restricted • population E. Quantitative analysis • Outcome: Scientific committee Meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 8 Nomination/Proposal summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Myoporum turbinatum Common name: Salt Myoporum Family name: Scrophulariaceae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status/criteria Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? State / Territory in Date listed or Listing category i.e. Listing criteria i.e. Jurisdiction which the species assessed (or critically endangered B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) occurs N/A) or ‘none’ International (IUCN Red List) National (EPBC Act) 16 July 2000 Endangered State / Territory 1. WA 1987 Threatened No criteria assigned 2. WA 2001 Critically Endangered B1ab(iii,v)+B2ab(iii,v); C2a(i) 3. WA 2015 None Priority 4 Consistent with Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding, it is confirmed that: • this assessment meets the standard of evidence required by the Common Assessment Yes No Method to document the eligibility of the species under the IUCN criteria; Comments: • surveys of the species were adequate to inform the assessment; Yes No Comments: Extensive survey undertaken between 2013 to 2014 located six new populations and six new subpopulations with the number of plants increasing from 171 plants counted in 2004 to 10,393. The range of the species was also extended by 30 km. A new population consisting of approximately 2,500 plants was located in a nature reserve. • the conclusion of the assessment remains current and that any further information that Yes No may have become available since the assessment was completed supports or is consistent with the conclusion of the assessment. Comments: The 2015 assessment remains current . The species previously met CR: B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v); C2a(i) due to the severe fragmentation of populations and continuing decline in the area, extent and quality of habitat and the number of mature individuals. It no longer meets these criteria due to an increase in the number of subpopulations, occurrences in extensive nature reserves, number of plants and its range, including in areas that are not under direct threat. Nominated national conservation status: category and criteria Page 2 of 8 Presumed extinct (EX) Critically endangered (CR) Endangered (EN) Vulnerable (VU) None (least concern) Data Deficient Conservation Dependent What are the IUCN Red List criteria that support the recommended conservation status category? Eligibility against the IUCN Red List criteria (A, B, C, D and E) Provide justification for the nominated conservation status; is the species eligible or ineligible for listing against the five criteria. For delisting, provide details for why the species no longer meets the requirements of the current conservation status. A. Population size reduction • Surveys carried out in 2013-2014 found six new populations and six new (evidence of decline) subpopulations, with the known number of plants increasing from 171 plants counted in 2004 to 10,393 in 2013-14, as a result of increased survey effort. • The species appears to undergo population variation within individual subpopulations in response to recruitment events. In 2014, large numbers of new seedlings were found in areas previously containing low numbers of plants. The fruit is woody and indehiscent, and appears to be long-lived and requires some form of treatment to germinate. It is apparent that the species periodically undergoes a mass recruitment event, possibly after fire, followed by slow decline as the plants age. • The species grows in areas associated with salt lakes which are naturally isolated, and not productive for agriculture. Identified threats to the species are not likely to result in significant longer term population decline. • Insufficient information to assess criteria B. Geographic range • Extensive survey from 2013 to 2014 extended the species range by 30 km. (EOO and AOO, number of A new subpopulation was located in a nature reserve and there is locations and evidence of potential for more subpopulations to be found in the large area of habitat decline) between the currently known eastern and western subpopulation areas. The EEO is approximately 420 km2 and using the 2x2km2 grid system the area of occupancy is 40 km2. • There is no evidence of ongoing decline and the nature of the threats listed for the species are not likely to result in ongoing decline. The biology of the species is for populations to decline and recruit from soil seed sources, with fire frequency in that environment not likely to restrict seed production capacity after fire regeneration. Both locations have subpopulations in nature reserves which are protected, and Location 2 is showing an increase in plant numbers. The species grows in areas associated with salt lakes which are not likely to be developed for agriculture when in private ownership, and no evidence of habitat decline. • Does not meet criteria as no continuing decline observed or projected, and the variation in population size between recruitment events is not placing the species at risk and not considered to be extreme fluctuation under the IUCN criteria C. Small population size and • Further surveys conducted in 2013-2014 increased the total known decline number of mature individuals to 10,393, located on 87 small lakes Page 3 of 8 (population size, distribution comprising 12 subpopulations at 2 locations. and evidence of decline) • Largest subpopulations exceeds 1000 (2500) mature individuals (refer to table at end of nomination form), and several with >1000 seedlings. • No population decline observed or projected. • Does not meet criteria D. Very small or restricted • 10,393 mature individuals. population • Does not meet criteria (population size) E. Quantitative analysis • No data (statistical probability of extinction) Summary of assessment information EOO 420 km2 AOO 40 km2 Generation - length No. locations 2 Severely fragmented Yes No Unknown No. subpopulations 12 No. mature individuals 10,393 Percentage global population within Australia 100 Percentage population decline over 10 years or 3 generations unknown Threats (detail how the species is being impacted) Threat Extent Impact (describe the threat and how it impacts on the (give details of impact on (what is the level of threat to the species. Specify if the threat is past, current or whole species or specific conservation of the species) potential) subpopulations) Refer to table at end. General over vegetation in Low level impact that do not which the species occurs. represent a threat to the Threats are general in nature relating to vegetation conservation of the species. management, and do not represent targeted threats to the species. Management and Recovery Is there a Recovery Plan (RP) or Conservation Management Plan operational for the Yes No species? List all relevant recovery or management plans (including draft, in-preparation, out-of-date, national and State/Territory recovery plans, recovery plans for other species or ecological communities, or other management plans that may benefit or be relevant to the nominated species). • Taylor, H., Butler, R. and Brown, A. (2004) Salt Myoporum (Myoporum turbinatum) Interim Recovery Plan 2004– 2009. Interim Recovery Plan No. 186. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Western Australia. • Department of Parks and Wildlife (in prep) Salt Myoporum (Myoporum turbinatum) Draft Interim Recovery Plan 2016–2021. Interim Recovery Plan No. *. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia. List current management or research actions, if any, that are being undertaken that benefit the conservation of the species. Page 4 of 8 • Protect the sites from fire unless required for ecological reasons, and implement early intervention in any wildfires which may threaten the site; • Survey for additional populations. • Liaise with road managers to minimise disturbance to remnant vegetation when maintaining roads; • Installation of markers on road reserves and firebreaks to protect habitat when undertaking maintenance; • Monitor the populations for evidence of rabbits or weed impacts, or changes in plant or site health; List further recommended management or research actions, if any, that would benefit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Response of Rare and Poorly Known Western Australian Native Species to Salinity and Waterlogging Project 023191
    Determination of Response of Rare and Poorly Known Western Australian Native Species to Salinity and Waterlogging Project 023191 Final Report to the Natural Heritage Trust, Environment Australia July 2005 Anne Cochrane Science Division Department of Conservation and Land Management c/o 444 Albany Highway, Albany Western Australia, Australia 6330 [email protected] NHT Project 023191 Table of Contents Page List of Figures……………………………………………………………………… i List of Tables ………………………………………………………………….….... ii List of Photos…………………………………………………………………….....iii Executive summary…………………………………………………………...…… 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………... 2 Materials and Methods……………………………………………………………. 3 Species selection and seed collection……………………………………………….. 3 Experimental Design ………………………………………………………………. 4 Experiment 1. Seed germination and salt tolerance ……………………………….. 4 Experiment 2. Imbibition and recovery investigation …………………………….... 4 Experiment 3. Seedling growth and survival……………………………………........5 Statistical analysis……………………………………………………………………7 Results………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Experiment 1. Seed germination and salt tolerance ………………………….......... 7 Experiment 2. Imbibition and recovery investigation ………………………………10 Experiment 3. Seedling growth and survival ………………………………………..12 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….……. 15 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………….…… 18 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………….….. 19 References…………………………………………………………………….….... 19 NHT Project 023191 List of Tables Page Table 1. Western Australian endemic species
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Recovery Plan No
    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 116 SALT MYOPORUM (MYOPORUM TURBINATUM) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2002-2007 Robyn Phillimore and Andrew Brown Photograph: A. Cochrane February 2002 Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australian Threatened Species and Communities Unit (WATSCU) PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6946 Interim Recovery Plan for Myoporum turbinatum FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (the Department) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The Department is committed to ensuring that Critically Endangered taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from February 2002 to January 2007 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the taxon is still ranked Critically Endangered, this IRP will be replaced by a full Recovery Plan after five years. This IRP was approved by the Acting Director of Nature Conservation on 24 September, 2002. The provision of funds identified in this Interim Recovery Plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting the Department, as well as the need to address other priorities. Information in this IRP was accurate at May 2002. 2 Interim Recovery Plan for Myoporum turbinatum SUMMARY Scientific Myoporum turbinatum Common Name: Salt Myoporum Name: Family: Myoporaceae Flowering Period: May; October to February Dept Region: South Coast Dept District: Esperance Shire: Esperance Recovery Team: To be established Illustrations and/or further information: Brown, A., Thomson-Dans, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Nnual
    DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT nnual eport A R 2002-2003 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR Our Vision Our Principles Our Responsibilities A natural environment In making decisions we will be guided The Department of Conservation and in Western Australia that by the following principles: Land Management is part of a greater retains its biodiversity and • The diversity and health of ecological conservation community and has enriches people’s lives. communities and native species distinct State Government throughout WA will be maintained responsibilities for implementing and restored. Government policy within that • Where there are threats of serious or community. Conservation is a irreversible damage, the lack of full collective role. scientific certainty shall not be used Our Mission as a reason for postponing measures We have the lead responsibility for which seek to prevent loss of conserving the State’s rich diversity of In partnership with the community, biodiversity. native plants, animals and natural we conserve Western Australia’s • Users of the environment and ecosystems, and many of its unique biodiversity, and manage the lands resources will pay fair value for that landscapes. On behalf of the people of use. and waters entrusted to us, for their Western Australia, we manage more • Use of wildlife will be on the basis of than 24 million hectares, including intrinsic values and for the ecological sustainability. more than 9 per cent of WA’s land area: appreciation and benefit of present • Outcomes will be delivered in the most its national parks, marine parks, and future generations. effective and efficient way. conservation parks, regional parks, • Cooperation, sharing and integration State forests and timber reserves, of resources and knowledge within the nature reserves, and marine nature Department and between reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Study Group Field Trip Report
    Eremophila Study Group Newsletter 118 November 2017 ISSN-0811-529X Australian Native Plants Society (Australia) (ANPSA) Eremophila Study Group Newsletter No. 118 Study Group members on the road north of Port Augusta Lyndal Thorburn, Ken Warnes, Bev Rice and Bevan Buirchell at the ESG Field Trip A new hybrid ................................................. 18 Contents Study Group Field Trip Report ...................... 18 Letter from the Editor ...................................... 2 Events............................................................. 19 What’s New in the Study Group ...................... 2 From Your letters ........................................... 21 Keying Eremophila .......................................... 2 Future Newsletter Themes ............................. 25 Feature species – E. calorhabdos ..................... 7 Financial Report 2016-17 .............................. 26 A Note about Drought-hardiness ................... 10 Errata .............................................................. 27 E. hygrophana seedlings ................................ 11 About the Study Group .................................. 28 A Trip in Western Australia .......................... 13 1 | P a g e Eremophila Study Group Newsletter 118 November 2017 ISSN-0811-529X Letter from the Editor What’s New in the Study Group Welcome to the November 2017 edition of the New members Eremophila Study Group Newsletter. Welcome to new members Jill Bartlett (Vic), I write following our successful member field Simon Brown (NT), Bevan
    [Show full text]
  • FFF 15 March 17
    12. Further on your left is a young Ficus macrophylla or Moreton Bay Fig, which grows into a large spreading tree with a butressed A publication of the Friends trunk (photo below left). It has shiny green oval of the Australian National leaves with rusty undersides, and is found Botanic Gardens along the coast of New South Wales and southern Queensland. 15 - 28 March , 2017 Featuring the plants of the Australian National 15 Botanic Gardens, Canberra, ACT written and 13 illustrated by Friends Rosalind and Benjamin Walcott 14 12 11 13. On your right is Syzygium (Acmena) 10 smithii or Lilly Pilly, which is found along the 9 eastern coast of mainland Australia (photo above right). It is a small dense tree with glossy 8 green leaves. 5 6,7 14. On your left is Acronychia littoralis , an 4 endangered small tree with shiny leaves and 3 strongly scented greenish cream flowers (photo below left). The Scented Acronychia or 1 Beach Acronychia grows naturally in north 2 eastern coastal New South Wales and a few Today, in keeping with Tree Week, we areas in adjacent Queensland. will walk from the upper carpark to the Brittle Gum Lawn looking mostly at trees. 1. In the upper carpark to the right as you face the Visitor Information Centre is Corymbia peltata or Rustyjacket on your right, a small tree with smooth grey-green leaves and many round white balls of scented flowers mobbed 15. Turn right into the Brittle Gum Lawn to see by insects (photo above). This tree is found on your left Nothofagus moorei, which has around Cairns in Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • FFF 20 Dec 17
    12. Also on your right is Kardomia (Babingtonia) odontocalyx with arching sprays of green foliage covered in heads of white flowers (photo below left). This plant A publication of the Friends occurs in the wild in a restricted area of of the Australian National northern New South Wales and southern Botanic Gardens Queensland and is listed as vulnerable in the wild. 20 Dec. 17 - 2 Jan. 18 Featuring the plants of the Australian National Botanic Gardens, Canberra, ACT written and illustrated by Friends Rosalind and Benjamin Walcott Today we will walk from the Visitor Centre to the Rock Garden 10 13. Turn downhill on the Main Path Loop to see on your right Alyogyne huegelii ‘West Coast 13 14 Gem’ with clear purple ‘hibiscus’ style flowers 7-9 which open for a short period only but are 15 prolific (photo above right). The bush is medium 6 11,12 sized with coarse foliage. 14. Also on your right is Alyogyne huegelii ‘Misty’, a very attractive selection of A.huegelii with pale mauve flowers with maroon centres 5 and green foliage (photo below left). 4 1 3 1. From the Visitor Centre take the steps down 2 to the right to see on your left Eucalyptus langleyi or Green Mallee Ash (photo above). This eucalypt has grey-green foliage and large, 15. Still on your right is Crowea exalata ssp. white, scented ball flowers and is found on the magnifolia forming a mounded bush of fine south coast of New South Wales near Nowra. green foliage with red stems dotted with pale It is listed as vulnerable in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation, Flora, Fauna and Environmental Considerations Report
    Howick Road North Construction Project (Parmango Rd to Ridgelands Rd) Vegetation, Flora, Fauna and Environmental Considerations Report January 2017 Julie Waters (BEnvSci) Senior Environmental Officer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The survey has been undertaken in accordance with the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) Technical Guidance, Terrestrial Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment in Western Australia (2016) as part of the application to Clear Native Vegetation for a 6.19 km section of road upgrades. Total area of 18.97 hectares, 5.3 hectares of which is native vegetation. The permit area is along Howick Road Reserve (between Ridgelands road and Parmango road). The existing road is a gravel road within a 100 metres wide road reserve. The total cleared road width is currently 18 metres. The Shire is applying to clear 25m wide along the 6.19km section of road, however this is unlikely to be all cleared. Introduction The Shire of Esperance plans to upgrade Howick Road from the Fisheries to Coolinup road over a 3 year period. One section has already been done CPS7185. This is a major transport route to the Beaumont CBH grain receival facility and thus gets a high amount of trucks and other traffic. The survey is part of our compliance obligations for the purpose of clearing native vegetation to construct the road. Howick road is approximately 85km east of Esperance, on the south coast of Western Australia. The Shire of Esperance has applied for a 25m wide clearing footprint area. The current road is 18m wide and the gazetted road reserve is 100m. The survey is restricted to an area 5m either side of the existing road alignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Practices in the Identification of Critical Habitat for Threatened Species
    Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species Abbey E Camaclang, Martine Maron, Tara G Martin, and Hugh P Possingham Supporting Information Cite manuscript as Camaclang, A. E., M. Maron, T. G. Martin, and H. P. Possingham. 2015. Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species. Conservation Biology 29:482-492. Fully formatted and published version of the manuscript available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12428 Appendix 1. Code definitions and list of covariates used in the content analysis Table A1-1. Coding scheme used in the content analysis of critical habitat documents, organized into categories based on foreshadowing questions used to guide the analysis. Codes Definitions 1. Information Type (What type of information is critical habitat identification based on?) Occurrence data: Occurrence Based primarily on the locations of known occupied habitats, where species currently occur or where they have occurred in the past Habitat features Based on the presence of particular habitat features known or predicted to be essential from previous knowledge of species ecology/life history Model-based data: Habitat quality Based on quantitative habitat models that relate species presence to habitat size and quality Spatial structure Based on spatial structure of populations and accounts for habitat connectivity and potential for recolonization of extinct patches Minimum viable population sizes Based on estimates of minimum viable population sizes and the amount of habitat area required to meet these minimum targets Spatially explicit population viability Based on predictions of extinction risks in different habitat configurations, using spatially explicit population viability analyses 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Myoporum Turbinatum
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister approved this listing advice and deleted this species from the Vulnerable category, effective from 04/07/2019 Listing Advice Myoporum turbinatum Salt Myoporum Summary of assessment Conservation status Myoporum turbinatum has been found to be not eligible for listing in any category, as outlined in the attached assessment. Reason for conservation assessment by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee This advice follows assessment of information provided by Western Australia as part of the Common Assessment Method process, to systematically review species that are inconsistently listed under the EPBC Act and relevant state/territory legislation or lists. More information on the Common Assessment Method is available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/cam Public consultation Notice of the proposed amendment and a consultation document was made available for public comment for at least 30 business days between 6 November 2018 and 18 December 2018. Any comments received that were relevant to the survival of the species were considered by the Committee as part of the assessment process. Recommendations (i) The Committee recommends that the list referred to in section 178 of the EPBC Act be amended by deleting from the list in the Endangered category: Myoporum turbinatum Threatened Species Scientific Committee 26 February 2019 Ctenotus angusticeps (Northwestern Coastal Ctenotus) Listing Advice Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations/assessments under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status.
    [Show full text]
  • Due Diligence and Landfill Capability Assessment Lot 12 Kirwan Road Shire of Esperance
    Due Diligence and Landfill Capability Assessment Lot 12 Kirwan Road Shire of Esperance Assets | Engineering | Environment | Noise | Spatial | Waste Due Diligence and Landfill Capability Assessment Lot 12 Kirwan Road Prepared for Shire of Esperance March 2017 Project Number: TW17001 TW17001-Due diligence Site 19.1b March 2017 | Page 1 Due Diligence and Landfill Capability Assessment Lot 12 Kirwan Road Shire of Esperance DOCUMENT CONTROL Version Description Date Author Reviewer 0a Internal Review 10/1/17 EP RC 1a Draft released to Client 17/3/17 EP RC 1b Final released to Client 24/3/17 EP RC Approval for Release Name Position File Reference Director – Waste Ronan Cullen Management Section TW17001-Due diligence Site 19.1b Leader Signature Copyright of this document or any part of this document remains with Talis Consultants Pty Ltd and cannot be used, transferred or reproduced in any manner or form without prior written consent from Talis Consultants Pty Ltd. TW17001-Due diligence Site 19.1b March 2017 | Page i Due Diligence and Landfill Capability Assessment Lot 12 Kirwan Road Shire of Esperance Executive Summary The Shire of Esperance (the Shire) currently operates the Wylie Bay Waste Management Facility (WMF) which includes a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and a Class II (putrescible) landfill. The current landfill cell at the site is approaching the end of its operational lifespan and therefore, the Shire has identified the need for long term disposal options. To allow for the continuation of these critical current waste management services, the Shire commissioned the preparation of a Waste Disposal Strategy in 2012 which examined the options for long-term waste disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Eremophila Denticulata Subsp
    Interim Recovery Plan No. 352 Cumquat eremophila (Eremophila denticulata subsp. trisulcata) Interim Recovery Plan 2015–2020 Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia July 2015 Interim Recovery Plan for Eremophila denticulata subsp. trisulcata List of Acronyms The following acronyms are used in this plan: BGPA Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority CALM Department of Conservation and Land Management CCWA Conservation Commission of Western Australia CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CR Critically Endangered DEC Department of Environment and Conservation DAA Department of Aboriginal Affairs DFES Department of Fire and Emergency Services DPaW Department of Parks and Wildlife (also shown as Parks and Wildlife) DRD Department of Regional Development DRF Declared Rare Flora EDTFCRT Esperance District Threatened Flora and Communities Recovery Team EN Endangered EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation FMG Fortescue Metals Group FMS Fire management strategy GLSC Goldfields Land and Sea Council IBRA Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia IRP Interim Recovery Plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGA Local Government Authority NRM Natural Resource Management PEC Priority Ecological Community PICA Public Information and Corporate Affairs SCB Species and Communities Branch TEC Threatened Ecological Community TFSC Threatened Flora Seed Centre UCL Unallocated Crown Land UNEP-WCMC United Nations Environment Program World Conservation Monitoring Centre VU Vulnerable WA Western Australia 2 Interim Recovery Plan for Eremophila denticulata subsp. trisulcata Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife (Parks and Wildlife) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50 (CALM 1992; CALM 1994). Plans outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened flora or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process.
    [Show full text]