Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Statement Amberley Neighbourhood Development Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Statement Amberley Neighbourhood Development Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening Statement Amberley Neighbourhood Development Plan December 2016 1. Introduction 1.1 The purpose of this screening statement is to provide a screening opinion as to whether there might be any potential likely significant effects on internationally important wildlife sites (also known as European sites) that may be affected by the Amberley Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP), and therefore whether further Habitats Regulations Assessment work is required. Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening 1.2 Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) refers to the requirement for any plan or project to assess the potential implications for European sites. The need for HRA is set out within the EC Habitats Directive 92/43/EC which is transposed into British Law. Article 6(3) of the EU Habitats Directive provides that: “Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the [European] site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site's conservation objectives. In the light of the conclusions of the assessment of the implications for the site and subject to the provisions of paragraph 4, the competent national authorities shall agree to the plan or project only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate, after having obtained the opinion of the general public.” 1.3 The first stage of the HRA process involves an assessment or screening of whether the plan is likely to have a significant effect on one or more European sites either alone or in combination. This can include consideration of avoidance measures. The objective is to ‘screen out’ those plans and projects (or site allocations/policies) that can, without detailed appraisal, be said to be unlikely to result in significant adverse effects upon European sites. 1.4 If screening determines that there is the potential for likely significant effects, further HRA work would be required in the form of an Appropriate Assessment which considers the impact on the integrity of the European site is more detail. 1.5 This screening opinion statement has regard to the conservation objectives of the Arun Valley SPA, SAC and Ramsar. It also makes reference to other plans and projects (the emerging South Downs Local Plan and other Local Plans/Core Strategies as appropriate). The Amberley Neighbourhood Development Plan 1.6 The Amberley NDP includes general policies to guide development. It also includes allocations for a very small car park and a site to accommodate 6 dwellings; both of which are located adjacent to built form of Amberley village. It also makes provision for a new joint use school/community hall within the curtilage of the school. 1.7 When adopted, NDPs will be used by the local planning authority to determine planning applications for the Neighbourhood Areas that they cover. As the parish falls within the South Downs National Park, the policies for the NDP, once adopted, will form the planning policy for that part of the National Park, in the Parish of Amberley. Relevant European sites 1.8 The European wildlife site relevant to this neighbourhood development plan is the Arun Valley Special Protection Area (SPA)/Special Area of Conservation (SAC) /Ramsar site. Full details for the reason for designation, conservation objectives and key vulnerabilities are set out in Appendix 1. 2. Impact pathway screening 2.1 The information used for this screening statement has been gathered from the HRA for the South Downs Local Plan: Preferred Options, which was published in 2015, and as such, this screening report should be read in conjunction with it. 2.2 It should be noted that the South Downs Local Plan and its accompanying HRA has not been tested and accepted at Examination. Whilst this is the case, the Local Plan Preferred Options did recognise that some of the housing requirement quantum would be allocated through NDPs. It therefore set out the expected quantum of development for these various settlements. The expected level of development was taken into account in the Local Plan Preferred Options HRA. The Amberley NDP makes provision for the quantum of development as expected in the Local Plan Preferred Options; as such, it is considered that the evidence and findings of the Local Plan Preferred Options HRA can be used for the HRA screening of this NDP. 2.3 The HRA report for the Local Plan Preferred Options identified 5 potential impact pathways to the Arun Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar: Recreational pressure, water quantity (abstraction), water quality (wastewater discharge), loss of supporting habitat, and urbanisation. In combination impacts were also considered. The main body of the HRA report for the Local Plan Preferred Options discussed these impact pathways in more detail and was able to conclude that that there would be no likely significant effects as a result of the quantum of development proposed in Amberley. 2.4 It is noted that, in response to the Local Plan Preferred Options consultation on 2015, no objections were raised by the statutory bodies (Natural England, Environment Agency, and Historic England) regarding the conclusions of the HRA with respect to the Arun Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar. 2.5 Table 1 below draws together the conclusions and includes references to the relevant paragraphs of the HRA report. Table 1 – Summary of the screening outcome in the HRA Report of the South Downs Local Plan: Preferred Options Impact pathway Summary of the screening outcome in the HRA Report for the South Downs Local Plan: Preferred Options Recreational disturbance Screened out. of wintering waterfowl The quantum of development in the Amberley Neighbourhood Plan is for 6 dwellings. This is the same figure attributed to Amberley in the Impact pathway Summary of the screening outcome in the HRA Report for the South Downs Local Plan: Preferred Options South Downs Local Plan: Preferred Options; and consequently is the figure used in the HRA of the Preferred Options Local Plan. The quantum of total new dwellings in the South Downs Local Plan Preferred Options within 5km of the SPA equates to approximately 45-50 new dwellings. Given that recreational pressure is not identified as a specific issue in the Site Improvement Plan such a small number of dwellings will not result in a material change in recreational activity at the site. The Local Plan for Arun (a district located within 1.5km of the SPA) does not identify any new housing within 5km of Arun Valley SAC, SPA and Ramsar site; the adopted Horsham District Planning Framework (the SPA being situated in Horsham district) does not identify any specific locations for housing within 5km of the designated site. As such, this impact pathway upon this site can be screened out, both alone and in combination. Reference: paragraph 4.10.7 of the Preferred Options HRA Hydrology Water Screened out. quantity The appropriate assessment for the Southern Water Water Resource (abstraction) Management Plan considered future public water supply abstraction impacts on the Arun Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar site. It concluded that no adverse effects on integrity of the SAC/SPA/Ramsar site would arise. Reference: paragraph 6.3.7 of the Preferred Options HRA Water Screened out. quality (wastewater Although diffuse pollution from agricultural runoff is a significant issue discharge) that must be addressed, the principal pathway for a Local Plan to affect water quality in European sites is through increased discharge of treated sewage effluent. Provided new development can be accommodated within the existing consent headroom for the relevant wastewater treatment works, it is considered that the existing initiatives being implemented to ensure compliance of relevant Wastewater Treatment Works discharges and improve diffuse pollution, policies SD17 and SD16 within the SDNPA Local Plan and the small amount of development proposed within the catchment enable a conclusion that the South Downs National Park Local Plan will not result in a likely significant effect on the Arun Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar site. (paragraph 6.3.16 of the Preferred Options HRA) Loss of supporting habitat Screened out. The Arun Valley SPA and Ramsar site is designated for its wintering population of Bewick’s swan. It is widely accepted that Bewick’s swans feed on suitable farmland up to 5km from the designated site. As such, suitable fields within 5km of the SPA could constitute important supporting habitat if they support a large enough Impact pathway Summary of the screening outcome in the HRA Report for the South Downs Local Plan: Preferred Options percentage of the SPA population on a regular basis. Amberley is located adjacent to the designated site. Screened out due to Policy SD13: International Sites which requires development proposals which are within 5km of the Arun Valley SPA to undertake an appraisal as to whether the land is suitable for wintering Bewick swan, if they are important to the swan population, and if so, requires appropriate alternative habitat before development could proceed. Reference: paragraphs 7.2.19 and 7.2.20 of the Preferred Options HRA Urbanisation Screened out. Total number of dwellings in the vicinity are 26 dwellings (6 in Amberley and 20 in Coldwaltham). Such a small number of new dwellings are proposed in adjacent settlements, and as such, it is not considered that urbanisation is a strategic issue for this designated site. Reference: paragraph 8.2.2 of the Preferred Options HRA In combination Screened out. This potential impact pathway has been screened out through the each of the Arun & Adur and Horsham Core Strategies. These core strategies propose 25,000 houses. The SDNPA Local Plan proposes approximately 38 new houses within 7km which is a very small fraction of the total proposed.
Recommended publications
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment June 2021
    Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Horsham District Council July 2021 Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Damiano Weitowitz James Riley Max Wade James Riley Consultant Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Technical Director Isla Hoffmann Heap Senior Ecologist Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 13/10/20 Emerging draft JR James Riley Technical to inform plan Director development 1 18/12/20 Updated to JR James Riley Technical assess Director Regulation 19 LP. 2 15/01/2021 Update JR James Riley Technical following client Director comments 3 30/06/21 Further update JR James Riley Technical Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Prepared for: Horsham District Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC
    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Strategic Sites
    8. STRATEGIC SITES Introduction 8.1 This chapter sets out the policies for the strategic sites within the National Park. These sites represent one-off opportunities for developments of exceptional quality. They have the potential to make a substantial contribution towards sustainable growth and deliver multiple ecosystems services, which in turn promotes the National Park’s purposes and helps to achieve the vision set out in this Plan. The strategic sites are: Shoreham Cement Works, Upper Beading; and North Street Quarter and adjacent East gate area, Lewes. 8.2 Whilst the former ‘Syngenta’ site in Fernhurst is also a strategic site, it has already been allocated for a sustainable mixed-use development incorporating residential (approximately 200 homes), commercial development and other suitable uses in the Fernhurst Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP), which was made in 2016. 8.3 This chapter identifies how the strategic sites can collectively and individually contribute to meeting the National Park’s purposes, and how their development could be justified by exceptional circumstances and be in the public interest, in accordance with Policy SD3: Major Development in the South Downs National Park. 8.4 There are also three strategic housing allocations, these are set out with all the other allocations in Chapter 10. Land at Old Malling Farm in Lewes (Allocation Policy SD77) is a greenfield site that will make a significant contribution to meeting the unmet housing need of Lewes and was originally allocated in the Lewes Joint Core Strategy. The Depot / Brickworks site and former Holmbush Caravan Park, both located in Midhurst and both brownfield sites, will contribute significantly to the unmet housing need of Midhurst.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB Croydon Local Group Programme 2016
    RSPB Croydon Local Group Programme 2016 Indoor Meetings & Events Our monthly meetings are open to everyone, not just RSPB members. Admission: £4.00 (includes tea/coffee). They are held at Whitgift Sports Club, The Clubhouse, Croham Manor Road, South Croydon, CR2 7BG between 2pm-4pm and again between 8pm-10pm. 9th May 2016 - “The Science and Beauty of Birds”. Ever wondered why a raptor has an orbital ridge or what the purpose is of a tubenose on a petrel? In this talk, Oliver Smart guides us through some fascinating insights into the science of birds, their adaptations, evolution and physiology. 11th July 2016 - “Japanese Adventure”. So good was the feedback from members following Jenny Hibbert’s inaugural talk to the group in 2015 that we have taken up her offer to hear about her travels through Japan. This journey will take us through the Jigokudani Monkey Park, on to Kishiro Shitsugen National Park, then Kussharo Lake and journey’s end is at Rausu on the Shiretoko Peninsula. 8th August 2016 – General Meeting (afternoon) and AGM (evening). There will be a talk (content to be confirmed) before We meet here Buses 64 and 433 stop both the General Meeting and the Annual General Meeting. in Croham Road 12th September 2016 - “London’s Birds”. “People often tell me they never see anything but pigeons in the capital,” says David Daryll-Lambert, chairman of the London Bird Club, “But it’s amazing what you see here these days; everything from tawny owls to parakeets and an estimated 20 breeding pairs of peregrine falcons.
    [Show full text]
  • SDOS Programme 2021 Version 1.Pdf
    Provisional Events Programme 2021 https://www.sdos.org/ mailto:[email protected] Outings Programme We follow all Government guidelines relating to special precautions resulting from the Covid19 pandemic. Where necessary we will have to severely restrict the numbers of members on field outings and information on how to register for these will be sent by email. You can see up-to-date information on our events on the home page of our website. Month Location Leader Note Sat Jan 9th Pagham Habour - North Wall & Lagoon Bernie Forbes Full Jan Arundel Bernie Forbes Imp Wed. Feb 10th Waltham Brooks Roger Smith Half Thurs Feb 18th Henfield area Val Bentley Half Mar Warnham LNR Brianne Reeve Imp Sun Mar 7th Chichester Marina & Dell Quay Bernie Forbes Full Apr Goring Sea Watch Clive Hope Imp Sat Apr 24th Hope Gap, Cuckmere, Seaford Jen & Tim Holter Half May Woods Mill (Dawn Chorus) Brianne Reeve Imp May Woods Mill (Evening - Nightingales) Val Bentley Imp May Truleigh Hill Terry Goble Imp Fri May 21st Lavington Common Bernie Forbes Eve Tue Jun 1st Iping Common Simon Moffat Half June Bramber Brooks LNR Brianne Reeve Imp Jul Ferring Tricia Hall Imp Aug Thorney Island Clive Hope Imp Sat Sept 4th Cissbury Ring Clive Hope Half Tue Oct 12th Climping Beach & Atherington Clive Hope Half Oct River Adur Walk Tony Benton Imp Nov Beeding Brooks Terry Goble Imp Nov West Dean Woods Bernie Forbes Imp Sat Dec 4th Burpham & The Burgh Bernie Forbes Half Fri Dec 31st Shoreham Beach & Widewater All Half Key:- Imp – Impromptu, Full – Full Day, Half – Half Day Zoom Meetings
    [Show full text]
  • Of Place-Names in Sussex
    PREPARATORY TO A DICTIONARY OF SUSSEX PLACE-NAMES Richard Coates University of the West of England, Bristol © 2017 First tranche: place-names in A, E, I, O and U 1 Foreword It is now almost 90 years since the publication of Allen Mawer and Frank Stenton’s standard county survey The place-names of Sussex (English Place-Name Society [EPNS] vols 6-7, Cambridge University Press, 1929-30). While I was living and working in Sussex, before 2006, it had long been my intention to produce an updated but scaled- down of this major work to serve as one of the EPNS’s “Popular” series of county dictionaries. Many things have intervened to delay the fulfilment of this aspiration, but it struck me that I could advance the project a little, put a few new ideas into the public domain, and possibly apply a spur to myself, by publishing from time to time an online “fascicle” consisting of analyses of selected major or important names beginning with a particular letter. Here are the first five, dealing with the letters A, E, I, O and U. Readers are invited to send any comments, including suggestions for inclusion or improvement, to me at [email protected]. With that end in mind, the present work consists of an index in electronic form of the names covered by Mawer and Stenton, kindly supplied many years ago, before I was acquainted with the joys of scanning, by Dr Paul Cavill. For some of these names, those which Percy Reaney called “names of primary historical or etymological interest” (interpreted subjectively), I have constructed a dictionary entry consisting of evidence and commentary in the usual way, plus a National Grid reference and a reference to the relevant page-number in Mawer and Stenton (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Plan Launch Caroline Lucas MP Is Keynote Speaker At
    Arun and Rother Connections May 2014 Issue 1 Catchment Caroline Lucas MP is keynote Plan launch speaker at free Ecosystem The Arun and Western Streams Catchment Plan Services Conference and the ARC project were officially launched on 6 The first of three annual conferences being delivered by the February at two events at Arun and Rother Connections project (ARC) is being held at Lodge Hill near Pulborough. Brighton University on 24 June. Talks were held about a range of It is being held in partnership with Brighton University and is supported by the projects and initiatives due to be Heritage Lottery Fund and Southern Water. delivered across the catchment and participants were given The conference, with a keynote address by Dr Caroline Lucas MP, aims to information about how to get spread the word about green infrastructure and the wider services that involved. ecosystems provide, to help people make best use of them. The conference aims to provide information for: There was also a ‘Community local communities Market Place’ – a space where groups were able to display their planners projects and interact with architects participants. students in higher education the private sector (especially housing and construction) Local Enterprise Partnerships. The events also launched the Catchment Management Plan and Experts will cover a broad range of topics, including reducing flood risks, a new website for the catchment. improving biodiversity and designing a rain garden. You can attend part or all Despite torrential rain which led to of the conference – choose when you register. road closures, around 180 people For details and booking information, go to attended the two events.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulation Assessment
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Horsham District Planning Framework Horsham District Council April 2014 Horsham District Planning Framework – Habitats Regulations Assessment Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Horsham District Planning Framework (Preferred Strategy ‐ July 2013) under the Habitats Regulations 2010. Issue 4 – Final Prepared by: Bill Butcher Date: 10 April 2014 Disclaimer: This report has been prepared by eCountability Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. This report is confidential to the client, and eCountability Ltd accepts no responsibility whatsoever to third parties to whom this report, or yan part thereof, is made known, unless formally agreed by eCountability Ltd beforehand. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. eCountability Ltd disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. eCountability Ltd Kentisbeare, Exeter. www.ecountability.co.uk April 2014 2 Version 4 ‐ Final Horsham District Planning Framework – Habitats Regulations Assessment Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 This Report .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex RARE PLANT REGISTER of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants, Charophytes, Bryophytes and Lichens
    The Sussex RARE PLANT REGISTER of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants, Charophytes, Bryophytes and Lichens NB - Dummy Front Page The Sussex Rare Plant Register of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants, Charophytes, Bryophytes and Lichens Editor: Mary Briggs Record editors: Paul Harmes and Alan Knapp May 2001 Authors of species accounts Vascular plants: Frances Abraham (40), Mary Briggs (70), Beryl Clough (35), Pat Donovan (10), Paul Harmes (40), Arthur Hoare (10), Alan Knapp (65), David Lang (20), Trevor Lording (5), Rachel Nicholson (1), Tony Spiers (10), Nick Sturt (35), Rod Stern (25), Dennis Vinall (5) and Belinda Wheeler (1). Charophytes: (Stoneworts): Frances Abraham. Bryophytes: (Mosses and Liverworts): Rod Stern. Lichens: Simon Davey. Acknowledgements Seldom is it possible to produce a publication such as this without the input of a team of volunteers, backed by organisations sympathetic to the subject-matter, and this report is no exception. The records which form the basis for this work were made by the dedicated fieldwork of the members of the Sussex Botanical Recording Society (SBRS), The Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI), the British Bryological Society (BBS), The British Lichen Society (BLS) and other keen enthusiasts. This data is held by the nominated County Recorders. The Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) compiled the tables of the Sussex rare Bryophytes and Lichens. It is important to note that the many contributors to the text gave their time freely and with generosity to ensure this work was completed within a tight timescale. Many of the contributions were typed by Rita Hemsley. Special thanks must go to Alan Knapp for compiling and formatting all the computerised text.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape-Character-Assessment
    Horsham District Council HORSHAM DISTRICT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT Final Report October 2003 CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES Environment Landscape Planning Horsham District Council HORSHAM DISTRICT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT Approved By: Dominic Watkins Signed: Position: Associate Technical Director Date: 24 October 2003 Final Report October 2003 CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES Environment Landscape Planning 1190201R Final Rev3_Horsham Landscape Character Assessment_10-03 CONTENTS PAGE Acknowledgements i Preface ii Users Guide iii 120 INTRODUCTION 1 121 Background 1 122The Importance of Landscape Character 1 123 Planning Context 1 124 Purpose and Objectives of the Study 2 125 Relationship to Other Character Assessments 2 126 Approach and Methodology 4 220 THE SHAPING OF THE LANDSCAPE 9 221 General 9 222 Physical Influences 9 223 Historic Influences 12 320 FORCES FOR CHANGE 19 321 General 19 322Climate Change, Pollution and Changes in Water Quality 19 323 Agriculture, Land Management and Diversification 20 324 Built Development 21 420 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OVERVIEW, DESCRIPTIONS AND GUIDANCE 25 421 General 25 422Horsham District Landscape Character Types 25 423 Horsham District Landscape Character Areas 28 A1 Beeding Downs 31 A2Amberley to Steyning Downs 35 B1 Upper Findon Valley 39 C1 Beeding to Edburton Scarp 43 C2Washington to Steyning Scarp 47 C3 Amberley to Sullington Scarp 51 D1 Amberley to Steyning Farmlands 55 D2Henfield and Small Dole Farmlands 59 E1 Parham and Storrington Wooded Farmlands and Heaths 63 E2Coldwaltham Farmlands 67
    [Show full text]