DOCSLIB.ORG

Eurosla 20 P R O G R a M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eurosla 20 P R O G R a M E U R O S L A 2 0 2 0 t h A n n u a l C o n f e r e n c e o f t h e E u r o p e a n S e c o n d L a n g u a g e A s s o c i a t i o n University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, 1-4 September 2010 P R O G R A M M E W e d n e s d a y , 1 s t S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 9.00-18.30 R E G I S T R A T I O N D o c t o r a l W o r k s h o p s Room 3 Room 4 Room 6 Discussants Gürel, Gilabert Dewaele Ferrari, Grassi 9.00-9.30 Okugiri. Prototypical English relative constructions by Japanese speakers 9.30-10.00 Song. The L2 acquisition of null and overt pronouns Cabrelli Amaro. The Phonological Permeability Lertola. How interlingual subtitling can promote by English learners of Korean Hypothesis: Measuring regressive L3 interference to SLA? A multi-methods research test L2 phonological representations 10.00-10.30 Judy. Interface vulnerability in L2 Spanish (L1 Farsi): Campos-Dintrans. The first language phonology Menegale. Language learner autonomy aimed at The NSP in end-state grammars factor in SLA promoting plurilingual competences 10.30-11.00 C o f f e e B r e a k Discussants Bardel, Sorace Nuzzo, Vedder Grassi, Santoro, Lopriore 11.00-11.30 Bradičić. Perception of lexical similarities between Lumley. The development of a system of person Arsalan. Language socialization and effective L2 Italian and L3 English reference in L2 Japanese by English-speaking learners English language teaching in primary schools in Pakistan 11.30-12.00 Ortega Duran. Input and cognitive abilities effects Munezane.The power of will to cross the Rubicon: Gauci. Instructional intervention in interlanguage on L3 English oral production: A study on A way to foster L2 WTC pragmatics. An empirical study with advanced crosslinguistic influence learners of Italian in Malta 12.00-12.30 Svensson. Conceptual transfer in the expression Constantinou. An Investigation of bilingual and Stevenson. Different interpretations of similar of hypotheticality in Norwegian as L2 – a corpus- bidialectal pupils’ writing performance in Cyprus data: The difference between “phonetic” and based study “phonemic” perceptions 12.30-13.00 Iverson. L2 effects on a ‘stable’ L1 grammar: The Levkina.The effects of task sequencing on L2 Silva Veloso. Elaborazione di un test di L2 Brazilian Portuguese influence on L1 Spanish acquisition as mediated by working memory capacity valutazione della comprensione orale in italiano 1 13.00-14.00 L u n c h Language Learning ROUND TABLE: Interaction and second language acquisition Chairs: Simona Pekarek-Doehler and Gabriele Pallotti. Room: Aula Magna 14.30-15.00 Johannes Wagner, Language learning in the wild 15.00-15.30 Paul Seedhouse, A holistic approach to task-based interaction 15.30-16.00 Roy Lyster, Research on feedback effectiveness: From observation to intervention studies 16.00-16.30 Alison Mackey, Interaction research: Cognitively oriented and socially informed? 16.30-17.00 C o f f e e B r e a k 17.00-17.40 Discussion: Wagner, Seedhouse, Lyster, Mackey 17.40-18.30 Open discussion T h u r s d a y , 2 n d S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 8.30-9.00 R E G I S T R A T I O N 9.00-9.30 C o n f e r e n c e O p e n i n g P L E N A R Y – Chair: Jean-Marc Dewaele. Room: Aula Magna 9.30-10.30 Antonella Sorace. SLA as bilingualism: Or, it’s time to see the forest for the trees 10.30-11.00 C o f f e e B r e a k P A R A L L E L S E S S I O N S Aula Magna Room 1 Room 3 Room 4 Room 6 Room 7 Chair Di Sabato Mackey Steinlen Laufer Håkansson Lopriore Pawlak. Using focused McDonough. Reckziegel, Kabak. Elgort. Using priming Gabriele, Canales. Tremblay, communication tasks as Collaborative syntactic German L2 learners’ effects to evaluate L2 No time like the Sabourin. Behavioural a measure of implicit L2 priming activities and production of Italian vocabulary acquisition present: Examining and electrophysiological 11.00-11.30 knowledge EFL question consonant length transfer at the interfaces discrimination of non- development contrasts in L2 acquisition native contrasts by more and less experienced language learners 2 Rule, Myles, Basterrechea, Harada. No Hoshino. Examining Barton, Kupisch. Hasley. Scalar Mitchell, David, dos García Mayo. The pronunciation advantage difficulties in acquiring Genericity in adult implicatures in L2 Santos. The facilitative role of a for early learners over various meanings of L2 bilingual speakers of Spanish: Addressing the development of pushed output task in late learners vocabulary: Core German and French external interface debate 11.30-12.00 receptive lexical collaborative vs meaning or relatedness knowledge of instructed individual performance of L1 translation? young learners of L2 French Corcoran, Galindo. Grassi, Taccardo. Mora, Cerviño- Martinez. Towards a Researching L1 use in Incidental focus-on-form Povedano. more systematic 12.00-12.30 the FL classroom: A in multilingual content- Phonological short-term inclusion of multiword comparative study based classes: Evidence memory and L2 vowel expressions in SLA from the Italian context perception research and pedagogy 12.30-14.00 L u n c h a n d P o s t e r S e s s i o n P O S T E R S Abel, Vettori, Wisniewski. The second language in a multilingual context: The case of South Tyrol Agren. Silent plural morphology in written child L2 French: Like child L1 or adult L2? Ambroso, Tamponi. Lexical phenomena in C2 level written and oral productions in L2 Italian Andorno, Rosi. Polarity and agreement: Conflicting values in L2 acquisition and use of yes-no particles Arsalan. Language socialization and effective English language teaching in primary schools in Pakistan Avello Gómez. Study abroad and foreign accent: The production of /i: - ɪ/ and /æ - ʌ/ Bailey. An investigation of common vocabulary exercises in relation to the TOPRA model Boderé. The effect of language socialization on L2 acquisition of Dutch by 6-year-old toddlers Bond, Canales, Coughlan, Gabriele. Re-examining morphological sensitivity in the processing of agreement in L2 English 12.30-14.00 Brien, Sabourin. Ambiguity resolution in L2 processing as a function of age of acquisition Campbell. Is there a case for employing interlingual near-homophones in instructed SLA? Caruso, Pellegrino, Mignano, De Meo. Learning Italian another way: Analogical word formation and deaf foreign learners Ceruti. Enhancing the acquisition of compound nouns. The role of ‘focus on form’ in formal instruction. de Bot, Persson, Reitsma, Unsworth. Evaluating early foreign language learning: Instruments and procedures Di Sabato, Di Martino. Exploring the role of translation in young learners’ SLA Festman, Münte. Watching the brain coping with cross-language interference during syntactic and phonological processing: Behavioral and ERP data Gusliyenko, Safronova. What is my native language? Incomplete L1 acquisition in L2 environment Hancock, Sanell. Cross-linguistic considerations on the textual use of temporal adverbs in L2 French: A study of individual variation in a corpus Horiba, Fukaya, Saito. Is it a linguistic problem or a knowledge problem? Test performances of Indonesian nurse-candidates in Japan Kras. Auxiliary change under restructuring in child L2 grammars of Italian 3 P A R A L L E L S E S S I O N S Aula Magna Room 1 Room 3 Room 4 Room 6 Room 7 Chair Muñoz Forsberg Revesz Valentini Bonvino Caspers Agustin Llach. The Guijarro-Fuentes, Ahmadian. The effects Tasioudi, Rochecouste, Wrembel. Third vocabulary construct: Schmitz, Larranaga, of guided careful online Stravrakaki, Oliver. The changing language phonological Critical constraints on Müller. Bilingual L1 planning on Complexity, Guasti. The effect of learning strategy needs acquisition: An 14.00-14.30 word knowledge acquisition: Bare nouns Accuracy, and Fluency in morphological features among university investigation into in subject vs. object EFL learners’ oral on the comprehension students metalinguistic awareness position production: The case of of relative clauses by L2 and foreign accent English articles learners of Greek Wakabayashi, Demagny, Kuiken, Vedder, Yuan, Dugarova. Mercier. Mora, Cebrian, Hokari. Applying Hickmann, Gilabert. The Syntax-discourse Computational Aliaga-García. phrasal rules to lexical Hendriks, relationship between interface in English complexity and order of Contrasting syntax in deverbal Iakovleva. Tense- communicative adequacy speakers’ L2 acquisition acquisition of interfaces crosslinguistic 14.30-15.00 compounds in L2 English aspect markers in child and linguistic complexity of Chinese Wh- in L2 assimilation patterns L1 and adult L2 in the written output of topicalization with L2 vowel acquisition: Linguistic L1 and L2 writers discrimination ability determinants in English and French Wode. Vocabulary Ewert, Tomczak. Deconinck, Boers, Luzi. The relative Frontini. Statistical Trofimovich, development in early Fictive motion in English Eyckmans. That sounds construction in L2 profiling of L2 texts: An Lightbown, Halter. English Immersion and Polish: Transfer in like it! Motivating the Italian: Instability experiment on Italian From listening to 15.00-15.30 figurative language form-meaning connection between coordination corpora speaking: Learning processing of new L2 words and subordination pronunciation through comprehension practice 15.30-16.00 C o f f e e B r e a k P A R A L L E L S E S S I O N S Aula Magna Room 1 Room 3 Room 4 Room 6 Room 7 Chair Rastelli Rasier Kuiken Sorace Alanen Housen McManus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Matthew H. Ciscel
    MATTHEW H. CISCEL CURRICULUM VITÆ (last revised 9/14/2017) Professor and TESOL Coordinator 214 Beacon Street Department of English Hartford, CT 06105, U.S.A. Central Connecticut State University (1-860) 232-5223 1615 Stanley Street personal e-mail: [email protected] New Britain, CT 06050-4010 U.S.A. university e-mail: [email protected] (1-860) 832-2749 URL: http://www2.ccsu.edu/faculty/CiscelM EDUCATION 2002 Ph.D. in Linguistics, Areas: sociolinguistics and second language acquisition theory, University of South Carolina, Columbia (August 1998-December 2002) Dissertation Title: Language and Identity: L2 acquisition in post-Soviet Moldova 1996 M.A. in German, Areas: Germanic linguistics and 20th Century German culture, University of Iowa, Iowa City (August 1993-May 1996) 1991 B.A. cum laude in German, Areas: German and psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (Sept 1987-Aug 1991) 1989-1990 Academic exchange to Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany (course work in German language and literature, and psychology) ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2012-present Full Professor, Department of English, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT 2007-2012 Associate Professor, Department of English, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT (tenure granted 2008) Spring 2010 Senior Fulbright Scholar, Faculty of Letters and Arts, Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, România 2002-2007 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT Fall 2001 Visiting Instructor, Faculty of Modern Languages,
    [Show full text]
  • Input, Interaction, and Second Language Development
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Lancaster E-Prints SSLA, 21, 557±587. Printed in the United States of America. INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL Alison Mackey Georgetown University This study examines the relationship between different types of con- versational interaction and SLA. Long's (1996) updated version of the interactionist hypothesis claims that implicit negative feedback, which can be obtained through negotiated interaction, facilitates SLA. Similar claims for the benefits of negotiation have been made by Pica (1994) and Gass (1997). Some support for the interaction hypothesis has been provided by studies that have explored the effects of interaction on production (Gass & Varonis, 1994), on lexical acquisition (Ellis, Tanaka, & Yamazaki, 1994), on the short-term outcomes of pushed output (see Swain, 1995), and for specific interactional features such as recasts (Long, Inagaki, & Ortega, 1998; Mackey & Philp, 1998). However, other studies have not found effects for interaction on gram- matical development (Loschky, 1994). The central question ad- dressed by the current study was: Can conversational interaction facilitate second language development? The study employed a pre- test-posttest design. Adult ESL learners (N = 34) of varying L1 back- grounds were divided into four experimental groups and one control I am grateful to Susan M. Gass and Charlene Polio for insightful suggestions and help with this paper. I also want to thank Patsy Lightbown, Michael H. Long, Teresa Pica, and Merrill Swain for many helpful comments on the doctoral dissertation from which this paper arose. I am much indebted to Ian Thornton for assistance with the statistical analysis and discussions of many of the issues in- volved in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition Variationist
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 30 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition Susan M. Gass, Alison Mackey Variationist perspectives Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203808184.ch3 Robert Bayley, Elaine Tarone Published online on: 14 Nov 2011 How to cite :- Robert Bayley, Elaine Tarone. 14 Nov 2011, Variationist perspectives from: The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition Routledge Accessed on: 30 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203808184.ch3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 Variationist perspectives Robert Bayley and Elaine Tarone1
    [Show full text]
  • Learner Differences in Metalinguistic Awareness: Exploring the Influence of Cognitive Abilities and Language Experience
    Learner Differences in Metalinguistic Awareness: Exploring the Influence of Cognitive Abilities and Language Experience Daniel O. Jackson University of Hawai‘i at M ānoa 1. Introduction Recent emergentist views of language propose that its structure is “fundamentally molded by preexisting cognitive abilities, processing idiosyncrasies, and limitations” (Beckner et al., 2009, p. 17). Thus, the psychological characteristics that distinguish us as human contribute to language change at the collective and individual levels. With regard to the latter, it is particularly important for second language professionals to understand the nature of learners’ individual differences (IDs), so that we may appreciate these abilities, adapt instruction to idiosyncrasies, and circumvent limitations to the greatest extent possible. The outlook for research on IDs extends this perspective. For example, Dörnyei (2009) views IDs in second language (L2) research as multi-componential, integrated, dynamic, interacting, and complex. These themes are touched on throughout the following paper, which examines the role of L2 aptitude, working memory, and language experience in metalinguistic awareness stemming from exposure to an artificial language. * 2. Demystifying awareness for L2 research Following Schmidt (1990 and elsewhere), awareness is a form of consciousness implicated in mental processes that are crucial to L2 learning, including perception, noticing, and understanding. Regarding the distinction between noticing and understanding, he wrote: Noticing is related to rehearsal within working memory and the transfer of information to long- term memory, to intake, and to item learning. Understanding is related to the organization of material in long-term memory, to restructuring, and to system learning. (Schmidt, 1993, p. 213) Second language acquisition relies on both item and system learning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
    ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOKS The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition Edited by Susan M. Gass and Alison Mackey The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition ‘The editors, Susan M. Gass and Alison Mackey, have done a sterling job with this Handbook. The biggest names and rising stars in the fields of second language teaching and language learning have contributed to this “magnum opus”.’ Jean-Marc Dewaele, Birkbeck, University of London, UK The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition brings together fifty leading international figures in the field to produce a state-of-the-art overview of second language acquisition. The Handbook covers a wide range of topics related to Second Language Acquisition: language in context, linguistic, psycholinguistic, and neurolinguistic theories and perspectives, skill learning, individual differences, L2 learning settings, and language assessment. All chapters introduce the reader to the topic, outline the core issues, then explore the pedagogical application of research in the area and possible future development. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition is an essential resource for all those studying and researching second language acquisition. Susan M. Gass is University Distinguished Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Languages at Michigan State University. She is the author of many titles and co-author of Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course, Third Edition (Routledge, 2008), with Larry Selinker. She co-edits the series, Second Language Acquisition Research (with Alison Mackey, for Routledge). Alison Mackey is Professor in the Department of Linguistics at Georgetown University. She is the author of many titles, and co-author of Data Elicitation for Second and Foreign Language Research (Routledge 2007), with Susan M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Research Methods
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Luke Plonsky and Laura Gurzynski-Weiss 2 Research Methods Abstract: This paper begins with the assumption that there is no perfect study. Rather, the process of conducting language acquisition research involves numerous deci- sions, each of which is accompanied by a set of strengths and weaknesses and which must be justified as appropriate to the substantive domain and the research questions being addressed. The chapter describes many of these choices and their correspond- ing benefits and drawbacks, illustrating key concepts and techniques with examples while making frequent reference to methodological issues and trends currently taking place in the field. In particular, we focus on major decisions related to (a) research designs, both descriptive/observational and (quasi-)experimental; (b) elicitation tech- niques and instruments for collecting data both linguistic (e.g., grammaticality judg- ment tasks) and non-linguistic (e.g., questionnaires) in nature; and (c) quantitative (e.g., analysis of variance) and qualitative (e.g., grounded theory) techniques for analyzing data. Keywords: research design, quantitative research methods, qualitative research meth- ods, language acquisition, statistics 1 Introduction 1.1 The Value of Methodological Knowledge It is difficult to overstate the importance of methods in language acquisition research. Simply put, they are the means by which empirical evidence is gathered to advance knowledge. Our understanding of language acquisition is only as strong as the methods we employ. This path toward knowledge construction is contrasted with theoretical developments which complement, instruct, and are informed by empirical work (↗6 Language Acquisition Theories).
    [Show full text]
  • Books Research Methods
    Research methods in linguistics – A bibliography Introductory/overview textbooks, edited volumes and papers (including volumes/papers focusing on linguistic subfields) Blom, Elma & Sharon Unsworth, eds. (2010), Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Brown, James Dean & Theodore S. Rodgers (2002), Doing Second Language Research. Oxford: OUP. Dörnyei, Zoltan (2007), Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: OUP. Harrington, Kate, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland, eds. (2008), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Hoff, Erika, ed. (2012), Research Methods in Child Language. A practical guide. Malden/ MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Holmes, Janet & Kirk Hazen (2014), Research Methods in Sociolinguistics. A practical guide. Malden/MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Kasper, Gabriele (2008), Data collection in pragmatics research, in Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed.), Culturally Speaking. Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. 2nd edition. London & New York: Continuum, 279-303. Kortmann, Bernd, ed. (2015), Theories and Methods in Linguistics (Wörterbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [WSK] Online, Band 11). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. http://www.degruyter.com/view/db/wsk Krug, Manfred & Julia Schlüter, eds. (2013), Research Methods in Language Variation and Change. Cambridge: CUP. Litosseliti, Lia, ed. (2010), Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Continuum. Mackey, Alison & Susan M. Gass, eds. (2012),
    [Show full text]
  • Lourdes Ortega Curriculum Vitae
    Lourdes Ortega Curriculum Vitae Updated: August 2019 Department of Linguistics 1437 37th Street NW Box 571051 Poulton Hall 250 Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057-1051 Department of Linguistics Fax (202) 687-6174 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: https://sites.google.com/a/georgetown.edu/lourdes-ortega/ EDUCATION 2000 Ph.D. in Second Language Acquisition. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Second Language Studies, USA. 1995 M.A. in English as a Second Language. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Second Language Studies, USA. 1993 R.S.A. Dip., Diploma for Overseas Teachers of English. Cambridge University/UCLES, UK. 1987 Licenciatura in Spanish Philology. University of Cádiz, Spain. EMPLOYMENT since 2012 Professor, Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics. 2004-2012 Professor (2010-2012), Associate Professor (2006-2010), Assistant Professor (2004-2006), University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Second Language Studies. 2002-2004 Assistant Professor (tenure-track), Northern Arizona University, Department of English. 2000-2002 Assistant Professor (tenure-track). Georgia State University, Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL. 1999-2000 Visiting Instructor of Applied Linguistics, Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics. 1994-1998 Research and Teaching Graduate Assistant, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, College of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature. 1987-1993 Instructor of Spanish, Instituto Cervantes of Athens, Greece. FELLOWSHIPS 2018: Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Graduate Center, City University of New York, Advanced Research Collaborative (ARC). August through December, 2018. 2010: External Senior Research Fellow at the Freiburg Institute of Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg. One-semester residential fellowship at FRIAS to carry out project titled Pathways to multicompetence: Applying usage-based and constructionist theories to the study of interlanguage development.
    [Show full text]
  • The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research Into Second Languages
    Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages. Pre-print of Chapter 1. Not intended for wider circulation. Chapter 1: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages: Advancing Methodology and Practice Emma Marsden (University of York); Alison Mackey (Georgetown University/University of Lancaster); Luke Plonsky (Northern Arizona University) How we elicit our data is at the heart of empirical research. Debates around theories and constructs very often center around concerns about exactly how data were collected – Did the measure allow access to conscious reflection? Did the stimulus result in learners behaving realistically? Did any unintended factors impact our results and compromise our ability to explain them? Did we take into account the perspectives of targeted stakeholders? Improvements to how we collect our data can often lead to more persuasive tests of theory or constructs and/or more convincing applications in the real world. However, tapping into language processing, learning, use and attitudes clearly poses varied challenges, particularly when the aim is to capture the nature and causes of change over time while using relatively static, ‘one-off’ windows into the phenomenon under investigation. Added to this are many other factors that can affect methodological choices, for example, the mode (input versus output), conscious awareness, age and cultural appropriateness, cognitive and perceptual systems all interact with how language is perceived and produced. The current volume aims to address some of the issues involved in the collection of second language data. It emerged out of discussions at a conference “Eliciting data in second language research: Challenge and innovation”, held in 2013 at the University of York.
    [Show full text]
  • Recasts Versus Clarification Requests: the Relevance of Linguistic Target, Proficiency, and Communicative Ability
    This is a repository copy of Recasts versus clarification requests: the relevance of linguistic target, proficiency, and communicative ability. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/167450/ Version: Published Version Article: Mifka-Profozic, Nadia orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-8895 (2020) Recasts versus clarification requests: the relevance of linguistic target, proficiency, and communicative ability. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 2019-0149. ISSN 1613- 4141 https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2019-0149 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ IRAL 2020; aop Research Article Nadia Mifka-Profozic* Recasts versus clarification requests: The relevance of linguistic target, proficiency, and communicative ability https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2019-0149 Abstract: This paper compares the effects of recasts and clarification requests as two implicit types of corrective feedback (CF) on learning two linguistic structures denoting past aspectual distinction in French, the passé composé and the imparfait. The participants in this classroom-based study are 52 high-school learners of French FL at a pre-intermediate level of proficiency (level B1 of CEFR).
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Theory, Collaborative Language Documentation, and the Production of Pedagogical Materials
    Introduction: Collaborative approaches to the challenges of language documentation and conservation edited by Wilson de Lima Silva Katherine J. Riestenberg Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 20 PUBLISHED AS A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION & CONSERVATION LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION & CONSERVATION Department of Linguistics, UHM Moore Hall 569 1890 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 USA UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I PRESS 2840 Kolowalu Street Honolulu Hawai'i 96822 1888 USA © All texts and images are copyright to the respective authors, 2020 All chapters are licensed under Creative Commons Licenses Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Cover designed by Katherine J. Riestenberg Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data ISBN-13: 978-0-9973295-8-2 http://hdl.handle.net/24939 ii Contents Contributors iv 1. Introduction: Collaborative approaches to the challenges of language 1 documentation and conservation Wilson de Lima Silva and Katherine J. Riestenberg 2. Integrating collaboration into the classroom: Connecting community 6 service learning to language documentation training Kathryn Carreau, Melissa Dane, Kat Klassen, Joanne Mitchell, and Christopher Cox 3. Indigenous universities and language reclamation: Lessons in balancing 20 Linguistics, L2 teaching, and language frameworks from Blue Quills University Josh Holden 4. “Data is Nice:” Theoretical and pedagogical implications of an Eastern 38 Cherokee corpus Benjamin Frey 5. The Kawaiwete pedagogical grammar: Linguistic theory, collaborative 54 language documentation, and the production of pedagogical materials Suzi Lima 6. Supporting rich and meaningful interaction in language teaching for 73 revitalization: Lessons from Macuiltianguis Zapotec Katherine J. Riestenberg 7. The Online Terminology Forum for East Cree and Innu: A collaborative 89 approach to multi-format terminology development Laurel Anne Hasler, Marie Odile Junker, Marguerite MacKenzie, Mimie Neacappo, and Delasie Torkornoo 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning and Classroom Discourse References Abdesslem, Habib
    Learning and Classroom Discourse References Abdesslem, Habib. (1993). Analysing Foreign Language Lesson Discourse. IRAL, 31(3), 221- 235. Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Oxford: Blackwell. Alexander, R. J. (2004). Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. Cambridge: Dialogos. Aljasfreh, Ali, & Lantolf, James P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. Allen, P., Frohlich, E., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. In J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem, & B. P. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL’83 (pp. 231-252). Washington D. C.: TESOL. Allwright, Richard L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 157-171. Allwright, D. (1980). Turns, topics, and tasks: Patterns of participation in language learning and teaching. In Dianne Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 165-187). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc. Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141. Allwright, Dick. (2005). From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 9-32. Ammar, Ahlem, & Spada, Nina. (2006). One size fits all?: Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543-574. Antón, Marta. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 303-318. Antón, Marta, & DiCamilla, Frederick. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom.
    [Show full text]