The Philadelphia Experiment Wikipedia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Philadelphia Experiment Wikipedia archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/PX_07.doc [pdf] more related articles at http://www.stealthskater.com/PX.htm#Chica note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Rainbow on April 22, 2008. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if the updated original cannot be found at the original author's site. the Philadelphia Experiment Wikipedia "Operation Ghost" was an alleged naval military experiment at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, sometime around October 28, 1943 in which the U.S. destroyer escort USS Eldridge was to be rendered invisible to human observers for a brief period of time. It is also referred to as Project Rainbow. The story is widely regarded as a hoax [1][2][3]. The U.S. Navy maintains that no such experiment occurred. Furthermore, details of the story contradict facts about the Eldridge [4]. It has nonetheless caused ripples in conspiracy theory circles. Elements of the Philadelphia Experiment are featured in other government conspiracy theories. Synopsis of the Experiment Several different (at times conflicting) versions of the purported Experiment have circulated over the years. The following synopsis serves to illustrate key story points common to the majority of accounts [2]. The experiment was conducted by a Dr. Franklin Reno (or Rinehart) as a military application of a Unified Field Theory -- a term coined by Einstein. The Unified Field Theory postulates the interrelated nature of the forces that comprise ElectroMagnetic radiation and Gravity (i.e., EM can affect Gravity and vice versa) -- although to date no single theory has emerged with a viable mathematical expression. [StealthSkater note: no mainstream theory, that is. There are reports of a highly secretive "scalarized" version of Maxwell's EM equations along the views of Nikola Tesla's scalar waves. Also see Matti Pitkanen's TGD physics => doc pdf URL ] Through a special application of some version of the theory, it was thought possible (with specialized equipment and sufficient energy) to bend light around an object in such a way as to render it 1 essentially invisible to observers. The Navy -- which was engaged in World War II at the time -- considered this application of the theory to be of obvious military value and approved and sponsored the experiment. A destroyer escort -- the USS Eldridge -- was allegedly fitted with the required equipment at the naval yards in Philadelphia. The equipment was further alleged not to have properly been re-calibrated to this end. But in spite of this, the Experiment was performed again on October 28. This time, the Eldridge is alleged to have not only become almost entirely invisible to the naked eye but also actually vanished from the area in a flash of blue light. However, the U.S. naval base at Norfolk, Virginia -- just over 215 miles (346 km) away -- is alleged to have reported sighting the Eldridge offshore whereupon the Eldridge vanished from their sight and reappeared in Philadelphia at the site it had originally occupied in an apparent case of accidental teleportation. [StealthSkater note: another version of the story is that it was actually a minesweeper ship that was trying to retrace an established history timeline in order to avoid mines. Something that Tesla had accidentally discovered on his workbench (Tesla's "Arrow of Time"). The Eldridge "radar invisibility" story was a counter-intel ploy. And the "teleportation" add-on was a further disinformation twist. See doc pdf URL .] The alleged physiological effects of the experiment on the crew were profound. Almost all of the crew were violently ill. Some were alleged to have suffered from mental illness as a result of their experience. Behavior consistent with schizophrenia is described in other accounts. Still other members like Jacob D. Murray were physically unaccounted for -- supposedly “vanished” -- and five of the crew were allegedly "fused" to the metal bulkhead or deck of the ship. Still others were said to fade in and out of sight. Sometimes they would disappear, then crewmates would stick their hands into the spot they had disappeared and try to grab the crewmate. But if they did not, that spot would burst into flames. Horrified by these results, Navy officials immediately canceled the Experiment. All of the surviving crew involved were discharged. In some accounts, brainwashing techniques were employed in an attempt to make the remaining crew members lose their memories concerning the details of their experience. [StealthSkater note: folklore has it that the Experiment evolved into Project Phoenix (I) which combined elements of Wilhelm Reich's "orgone" weather-modifying radiosonde. Eventually in the later 1970s, Phoenix I/II/III became collectively known as the Montauk Project which reportedly opened portals in time and irreversibly altered timelines.] Morris Jessup and Carlos Miguel Allende In 1955, Morris K. Jessup -- an amateur astronomer and former graduate-level researcher -- published The Case for the UFO. It was a book about unidentified flying objects which contained some theorizing about the means of propulsion that flying-saucer-style UFOs might use. Jessup speculated that anti-gravity and/or manipulation of electromagnetism may have been responsible for the observed flight behavior of UFOs. He lamented (both in the book and the publicity tour which followed) that space flight research was concentrated in the area of rocketry and that little attention was paid to these other theoretical means of flight, which he felt would ultimately be more fruitful. On January 13, 1955, Jessup received a letter from a man who identified himself as Carlos Allende. In the letter, Allende informed Jessup of the Philadelphia Experiment, alluding to 2 poorly sourced 2 contemporary newspaper articles as proof. Allende also said that he had witnessed the Eldridge disappear and reappear while serving aboard the SS Andrew Furuseth -- a nearby merchant ship. Allende further named other crew members with whom he served aboard the Andrew Furuseth and claimed to know of the fate of some of the crew members of the Eldridge after the Experiment including one whom he witnessed disappear during a chaotic fight in a bar. Jessup replied to Allende by postcard, asking for further evidence and corroboration for the story. The reply came months later. However, this time the correspondent identified himself as Carl M. Allen. Allen said that he could not provide the details for which Jessup was asking but implied that he might be able to recall by means of hypnosis. Suspecting that Allende/Allen was a fraud, Jessup decided to discontinue the correspondence. The Office of Naval Research and the Varo annotation In the spring of 1957, Jessup was contacted by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) in Washington, D.C. and asked to study the contents of a parcel that they had received [5]. Upon arrival, a curious Jessup was astonished to find that a paperback copy of his UFO book had been mailed to ONR in a manila envelope marked "Happy Easter". Further, the book had been extensively annotated by hand in its margins and an ONR officer asked Jessup if he had any idea as to who had done so. The lengthy annotations were written in 3 different colors of ink and appeared to detail a correspondence among 3 individuals, only one of which is given a name: "Jemi". The ONR labeled the other two "Mr. A" and "Mr. B". The annotators refer to each other as "Gypsies" and discuss 2 different types of "people" living in outer space. Their text contained nonstandard use of capitalization and punctuation and detailed a lengthy discussion of the merits of various suppositions that Jessup makes throughout his book, with oblique references to the Philadelphia Experiment in a way that suggested prior or superior knowledge (for example, “Mr. B” reassures his fellow annotators who have highlighted a certain theory of Jessup’s). Based on the handwriting style and subject matter, Jessup identified "Mr. A" as Allende/Allen. Others have suggested that the 3 annotations are actually from the same person using 3 pens. The annotated book sparked such interest that the ONR funded a small printing of the volume by the Texas-based Varo Manufacturing Company [6]. A 2003 transcription of the annotated "Varo edition" is available online, complete with 3-color notes [7]. Later, the ONR contacted Jessup, claiming that the return address on Allende’s letter to Jessup was an abandoned farmhouse. They also informed Jessup that the Varo Corporation -- a research firm -- was preparing a print copy of the annotated version of The Case for the UFO, complete with both letters he had received. About 100 copies of the Varo Edition were printed and distributed within the Navy. Jessup was also sent three for his own use. Jessup attempted to make a living writing on the topic. But his follow-up book did not sell well and his publisher rejected several other manuscripts. In 1958, his wife left him and friends described him as being depressed and somewhat unstable when he travelled to New York. After returning to Florida, he was involved in a serious car accident and was slow to recover, apparently increasing his despondency. Morris Jessup committed suicide in 1959. Many conspiracy theorists believe that he was murdered by the government because of his knowledge of the Philadelphia Experiment. 3 Resurfacing via literature In 1965, Vincent Gaddis published Invisible Horizons: True Mysteries of the Sea, in which the story of the experiment from the Varo annotation is recounted. Later in 1977, Charles Berlitz -- an author of several books on paranormal phenomena -- included a chapter on the experiment in his book Without a Trace: New Information from the Triangle.
Recommended publications
  • Philadelphia Experiment.Indd
    JOSEPH POTHIER The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited This essay is the fi rst part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question. Introduction The Philadelphia experiment has engendered a vivacious must be verifi able. It is also desirable to produce a thesis or literature among fringe science enthusiasts, and its princi- interpretation fl exible enough to withstand the discovery pal expression is found in William L. Moore and Charles of new evidence, should it become available. The follow- Berlitz’ The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility…. ing essay, the fi rst of two parts, examines the Philadelphia To the initial question, then, we must add a subsidiary one: experiment thesis as presented by Moore and Berlitz in light Did the Philadelphia experiment happen in the way Moore of these three fundamentals of historical inquiry. and Berlitz claim it did? According to Moore and Berlitz, the genesis of the Phila- Reduced to its basics, the Philadelphia experiment thesis delphia experiment was a 1940 suggestion by Albert Ein- asserts that during World War II the United States Navy stein and his fellow Princeton physicist Rudolf Landenburg conducted an experiment based on Albert Einstein’s Unifi ed to use electromagnetic fi elds on surface ships to counter Field Theory (UFT) using the destroyer escort USS Eldridge magnetic mines and torpedoes. Dr. John von Neumann, (DE 173) aimed at producing the ultimate in camoufl age, Robert Harrington Kent, a Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Destructores De La Clase Cannon En La Marina De Guerra Del Perú
    LOS DESTRUCTORES DE LA CLASE CANNON EN LA MARINA DE GUERRA DEL PERÚ LOS DESTRUCTORES DE LA CLASE CANNON EN LA MARINA DE GUERRA DEL PERÚ THE DESTRUCTORS OF THE CANNON CLASS IN THE MARINA DE GUERRA DEL PERÚ Ernesto Piero Bazzetti De los Santos Universidad Ricardo Palma [email protected] RESUMEN A raíz de una conferencia, en la que se tocaron algunos temas relacionados a unidades navales que sirvieron en nuestra armada, recibí la propuesta de investigar sobre unidades navales, yo sabía que Jorge Ortiz Sotelo, había estudiado brillantemente el historial de los submarinos peruanos y John Rodríguez Asti; los cruceros; cuestión que no podía repetir, así que empecé esta investigación sobre los destructores en la Marina de Guerra del Perú. En esta primera entrega veremos el historial de los destructores escolta de la clase CANNON. Veremos una breve introducción sobre estas unidades, los buques que sirvieron en diversas armadas, destacando las sudamericanas, también sus especificaciones técnicas, para luego pasar a su historial en la armada estadounidense, su incorporación e historial en nuestra armada, las unidades que en la actualidad se han preservado. PALABRAS CLAVE destructor, armada, escolta, submarino, crucero. ABSTRACT Following a conference, which touched on some issues related to naval units that served in our Navy, I received the proposal to investigate naval units, I knew that Jorge Ortiz Sotelo, had studied brilliantly the history of Peruvian submarines and John Rodríguez Asti; cruises; I could not repeat, so I started this investigation about the destroyers in the Peruvian Navy. In this first installment, we will see the history of the escort destroyers of the CANNON class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philadelphia Experiment
    archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Shelton_01.doc [pdf] read more of the P-X at http://www.stealthskter.com/PX.htm note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Labyrinth/9378/ and http://madwriter004.bravehost.com/QFT.html on December 6, 2002. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if it cannot be found at the original author's site. Quest for Truth: The Philadelphia Experiment The Quest for Truth: To discern the facts from the fiction, to find information instead of disinformation, to investigate the sources instead of believing everything, and to distinguish reality from New Age fantasies. by Mack W. Shelton, Jr. Original copyright by M. W. Shelton Jr. May 8, 1996 First appearing in Planes of Reality magazine May 16, 1996 For over 50 years, rumors and stories have circulated throughout the population of sci-fi buffs, legend seekers, researchers and publicity seekers regarding an incident so heinous and horrible that the U.S. Navy and the Office of Naval Research have been said to conspire to cover it up. The alleged incident is said to have involved a destroyer escort in an experiment gone awry. Is it true? Or is it a hoax? In this feature, we will examine the legend, incidents leading to the Experiment, and facts "substantiating" the validity of the Experiment. After presenting the information with our stated opinions, we will leave it to you-the-reader to make up your own mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Military History Collections
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING AMERICAN HERITAGE CENTER GUIDE TO Military History Resources Soldiers on patrol in Vietnam, 1962. Photograph by Richard Tregaskis, Richard Tregaskis Papers, American Heritage Center. Compiled and Edited by Ryan E. Frost 2009 1 American Heritage Center Guide to Military History Resources Introduction The American Heritage Center (AHC) is the University of Wyoming’s (UW) repository for historical manuscripts, rare books, and university archives. Internationally known for its historical collections, the AHC first and foremost serves the students and citizens of Wyoming. The AHC sponsors a wide range of scholarly and popular programs including lectures, symposia, and exhibits. A place where both experts and novices engage with the original sources of history, access to the AHC is free and open to all. Collections at the AHC go beyond both the borders of Wyoming and the region, and support a wide range of research and teachings activities in the humanities, sciences, arts, business, and education. Major areas of collecting include Wyoming and the American West, the mining and petroleum industries, environment and natural resources, journalism, military history, transportation, the history of books, and 20th century entertainment such as popular music, radio, television, and film. The total archival holdings of the AHC are roughly 75,000 cubic feet (the equivalent of 18 miles) of material. The Toppan Rare Books Library holds more than 60,000 items from medieval illuminated manuscripts to the 21st century. Subject strengths include the American West, British and American literature, early exploration of North America, religion, hunting and fishing, natural history, women authors, and the book arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Presentations
    CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS OUR MARITIME COMMUNITIES —STRONGER TOGETHER 11TH MARITIME HERITAGE CONFERENCE 45TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON SAIL TRAINING AND TALL SHIPS 55TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY 82ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE STEAMSHIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 14-17, 2018 NEW ORLEANS ACCESSIBILITY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT CINDY BETH DAVIS-DYKEMA As bricks-and-mortar preservation work restores aging lighthouses, lighthouse groups are facing new challenges in transitioning from capital projects to cultural site management. Cindy Beth Davis-Dykema of the Michigan Lighthouse Conservancy examines some of the issues involved in welcoming visitors. ACCESSING USS CONSTITUTION RECORDS THROUGH A DIGITAL PORTAL CARL HERZOG The USS Constitution Museum is in the final stages of a project to develop an online collection, research and interpretive portal tentatively called “Explore USS Constitution and the War of 1812.” The museum’s goal is to create a visually compelling, easily navigable, content-rich, and engaging interpretive experience that will transform what is known about “Old Ironsides,” her crew, and the War of 1812. The project will also make the museum’s decade-long groundbreaking historical research, top notch collections, and award-winning resources broadly available for the first time. This presentation will look at the tools, technologies and curatorial decision-making process that have gone into creating this portal. The project has relied on a diverse set of partnerships to document the objects being included and create the digital platforms to display them. The site will incorporate new object photography along with images of the museum’s archival collection digitized by Digital Commonwealth at the Boston Public Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Experiment'*
    Philadelphia E^xperiment http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-l.hl. ' Return to Naval Historical C:enter home page, Return to Frequently Asked Questions page. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - NAVAL fflSTORICAL CENTER 901 M STREET SE -- WASHDWGTON NAVY YARD WASHINGTON DC 20374-5060 The "Philadelphia Experiment'* Related resources: : Office of Naval Research (ONR) fact sheet IJFO Research Guide Photograph of USS Eldridge Allegedly, in the fall of 1943 a U.S. Navy destroyer was made invisible and teleported from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Norfolk, Virginia, in an incident known as the Philadelphia Experiment. Records in the Operational Archives Branch of the Naval Historical Center have been repeatedly searched, but no documents have been located which confirm the event, or any interest by the Navy in attempting such an achievement. The ship involved in the experiment was supposedly the USS Eldridge . Operational Archives has reviewed the deck log and war diary from Eldridge 's commissioning on 27 August 1943 at the New York Navy Yard through December 1943. The following description of Eldridge 's activities are summarized from the ship's war diary. After commissioning,£Wnrf^^ remained in New York and in the Long Island Sound until 16 September when it sailed to Bermuda. From 18 September, the ship was in the vicinity of Bermuda undergoing training and sea trials until 15 October when Eldridge left in a convoy for New York where the convoy entered on 18 October. Eldridge remained in New York harbor until 1 November when it was part of the escort for Convoy UGS-23 (New York Section).
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 16 Thru 31 Oct
    Military History Anniversaries 16 thru 31 Oct Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Oct 16 1690 – Colonial America: Battle of Quebec (16-24 OCT) » Fought between the colonies of New France and Massachusetts Bay, then ruled by the kingdoms of France and England, respectively. It was the first time Québec's defenses were tested. Following the capture of Port Royal in Acadia, during King William's War, the New Englanders hoped to seize Québec itself, the capital of New France. The loss of the Acadian fort shocked the Canadians, and Governor-General Louis de Buade de Frontenac ordered the immediate preparation of the city for siege. When the envoys delivered the terms of surrender, the Governor-General famously declared that his only reply would be by "the mouth of my cannons." Major John Walley led the invading army, which landed at Beauport in the Basin of Québec. However, the militia on the shore were constantly harassed by Canadian militia until their retreat, while the expedition's ships, commanded by Sir William Phips, were nearly destroyed by cannon volley fire from the top of the city. Both sides learned from the battle: the French improved the city's defenses, while the New Englanders realized they needed more artillery and better support from England to take the city. Oct 16 1773 – American Revolution: Royalton Philadelphia Resolutions Criticize Tea Act » The first public statement against the British Parliament’s Tea Act was a document printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette on this day in 1773.
    [Show full text]