DOCSLIB.ORG

A Catalogue of Coleoptera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Catalogue of Coleoptera ФОНД ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ FUND OF FUNDAMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS O.P. Александрович, И.К. Лопатин, А.Д. Писаненко, В.А. Цинкевич, СМ. Снитко O.R. Alexandrovitch, I.К. Lopatin, A.D. Pisanenko, V.A. Tsinkevitch, S.M. Snitko КАТАЛОГ ЖЕСТКОКРЫЛЫХ (COLEOPTERA, INSECT A) БЕЛАРУСИ A CATALOGUE OF COLEOPTERA (INSECTA) OF BELARUS Минск 1996 УДК 565.76(476) ББК 28.691.89(4Бел) Александрович О.Р., Лопатин И.К., Писаненко А.Д., Цинкевич В.А., Снитко С.М. Каталог жесткокрылых (Coleoptera, Insecta) Беларуси. — Минск.: ФФИ РБ. —1996. - 103 с. Впервые составлен каталог жесткокрылых, обитающих на территории Беларуси, включающий 3237 видов. Приведена библиография по фауне и экологаи жуков, охватывающая 1342 источников. Alexandrovitch O.R., Lopatin I.K., Pisanenko A.D., Tsinkevitch V.A., Snitko S.M. A Catalogue of Coleoptera (Insecta) of Belarus. -Minsk: FFR RB. - 1996. -103 p. For the first time the check-list of Coleoptera inhabiting the territory of Belarus, comprising 3237 species. The bibliography on fauna and ecology of the beetles containing 1342 sources. Заказы направлять по Address for адресу: correspondence: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Адреса авторов: Author's address: Александрович Олег Родославович Alexandrovitch Oleg R. Цинкевич Вадим Анатольевич Tsinkevitch Vadim A. Снитко Сергей Михайлович Snitko Sergej M. Кафедра зоологии, Белорусский Department of Zoology, Belarus' государственный педагогический State Pedagogical University, ul. университет, ул. Советская, 18 Sovetskaja, 18 Minsk 220809 Минск, 220809 Беларусь Belarus' Лопатин Игорь Константинович Lopatin Igor K. Кафедра зоологии, Белорусский Department of Zoology, Belarus' государственный университет, пр. State University, F. Scaryna Ave, Ф. Скарыны, 4, Минск, 220080 4 Minsk 220080 Belarus' Беларусь Pisanenko Alexandr D. Писаненко Александр Дмитриевич Department of Zoology, Belarus' Зоологический музей Белорусского State University, F. Scaryna Ave, государственного университета, пр. 4 Minsk 220080 Belarus' Ф. Скарыны, 4, Минск, 220080 Беларусь © Фонд Фундаментальных ISBN 985-6321-01-8 исследований Республики Беларусь, 1996 2 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ Геоботанические округа Беларуси .................................................................................. 4 Введение .......................................................................................................................... 5 Каталог ............................................................................................................................ 9 Библиография .................................................................................................................. 62 Алфавитный указатель ..................................................................................................... 97 CONTENTS Geobotanical districts of Belarus ........................................................................................ 4 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 Cataloque .......................................................................................................................... 9 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 62 Index generum ................................................................................................................... 97 3 Геоботанические округа Беларуси (по И.Д.Юркевичу и др., 1979) Geobotanical districts of Belarus (according to I.D. Yurkevich et al, 1979) 1 — Западно-Двинский Zapadno-Dvinskij 2 — Ошмянско-Минский Osmj an sko - Minskij 3 — Оршанско-Могилёвский Orshansko-Mogilevskij 4 — Неманско-Предполесский Nemansko-Predpolesskij 5 — Березинско-Предполесский Beresinsko-Predpolesskij 6 — Бугско-Полесский Bugsko-Polesskij 7 — Полесско-Приднепровский Polessko-Pridneprovskij 4 ВВЕДЕНИЕ В Беларуси немногочисленны Крупнейшая коллекция Н.М. Ар- фундаментальные монографические нольда, представляющая жесткокрылых исследования фауны насекомых, а из юго-востока Беларуси во второй поло- представителей жесткокрылых - самого вине прошлого века, хорошо сохранилась богатого видами отряда живых организмов и находится в ЗИН РАН. Нами проведено - рассмотрены лишь Carabidae, Dytiscidae, ее исследование (Атександрович, 1992; Staphylinidae, Histeridae, Scarabaeidae, Писаненко, Александрович, 1995) и под- Coccinellidae, Lathridiidae, Chrysomelidae, готовлены списки около 900 видов жуков Apionidae, Curculionidae. В целом изучение с современными названиями и исправле- жесткокрылых носило выраженный при- ниями ошибочных определений. кладной характер. Необходимость изуче- Г.Г. Якобсон (1905-1913) в "Ката- ния биологического разнообразия в Бела- логе жесткокрылых России и Западной руси, составляющей частью которого яв- Европы" использовал данные К.Э. Линде- ляются фаунистические комплексы жест- мана (1871), Н.М. Арнольда (1902) по кокрылых, и привела к подготовке дан- Могилевской губернии и В.И. Бялыниц- ной работы. кого-Бирули и В.А. Плющевского-Плю- Наши собственные многолетние щика по Витебской, из коллекции ЗИН исследования видового состава жестко- РАН, С знаком ? и ?Ulan. в первых вы- крылых Беларуси выполнялись парал- пусках "Каталога" Г.Г Якобсон исполь- лельно с обобщением литературных дан- зовал данные А. Улановского (Ulanowski, ных и изучением коллекционных мате- 1872) по северо-восточной Польше, риалов. Всего проанализировано 1342 пу- включающие много карпатских и занад- бликации. При рассмотрении фауни- ноевроевропейских видов. Однако, в 1907 стических списков установлено, что в году появилась его статья "Фаунис- ряде случаев указания редких и новых для тическое недоразумение", в которой региона видов не подтверждаются кол- сообщается, что сборы А. Улановского лекционными материалами. Нами были происходят из Волыни и Подолья, а в изучены все доступные коллекционные публикации приводятся ошибочные материалы, собранные на территории этикеточные данные. Г.Г Якобсон (1907) Беларуси с середины прошлого (Н.М. рекомендовал не использовать эти Арнольд) до начала нынешнего века (A.A. данные в фаунистических и зоогеогра- Бируля, А.К. Мордвилко, А.Н. Кири- фических работах. ченко), хранящиеся в лаборатории систе- Коллекции И.Я. Роубала (1910) из матики насекомых Зоологического инсти- Беловежской пущи и Виленского края, тута Российской Академии наук (ЗИН вероятно, сохранились в Польше, судя по РАН, Санкт-Петербург). Исследованы цитированию данных из них до насто- сборы М.С. Гилярова, А.Л. Тихомировой, ящего времени. хранящиеся в Зоологическом музее Мос- К сожалению, не сохранилась ковского Государственного университета коллекция В.А. Плющевского-Плющика, (ЗМ МГУ, Москва). крупнейшего исследователя фауны жест- Нам не удалось обнаружить кол- корылых Белорусского Поозерья. Его пу- лекций В. Ванковича (Wankowich, 1856- бликации (1919абв, 1925аб) носят при- 1872), в публикациях которого описаны кладной и научно-популярный характер, новые роды и виды жесткокрылых из фаунистических списков в них нет. пределов Беларуси. По устному сооб- Крупнейшие сводки советского щению V. Putz, эти материалы находятся периода А.И. Радкевича (1936,1940,1970, в Париже и Брюсселе, - там, где выхо- 1972) по жесткокрылым Поозерья, к со- дили публикации В. Ванковича. О досто- жалению не обеспечены надежными кол- верности описаний и коллекций говорят лекционными материалами. В музее Ви- и материалы современных ревизий, и тебского пединститута фондовые кол- широкое использование его описаний в лекции жесткокрылых отсутствуют. То, научной литературе. что удалось обнаружить, не этикетиро- В обширном труде К.Э. Линде- вано и хранится вместе с заведомо небе- мана (1871) для окрестностей Горок (Мо- лорусскими материалами (Кавказ, Крым, гилевская область) приведены результаты Средняя Азия). Просмотр материалов, обработки коллекции жесткокрылых, со- происходящих из Витебска и области бранной Э. Баллионом в середине про- (губернии), в лаборатории систематики шлого века. Сама коллекция сохранилась насекомых ЗИН РАН выявил этикети- (частично) в зоомузее Одесского госуни- рованные материалы из коллекций В.И. верситета. Большинство видов не вы- Бялыницкого-Бирули и В.А. Плющевс- зывает сомнений, тем более, что они со- кого-Плющика. Из сборов А.И. Радкеви- браны повторно Н.М. Арнольдом (1902). ча обнаружены несколько видов Крым- 5 ских, кавказских и сибирских жужелиц с списке *). Литературные указания Abax этикетками: окрестности Витебска и пр. ovalis (Duftschmid, 1812), Atheta taxiceroides Это вынуждает с большой осторожностью Munster, 1932, Philonthus caucasicus Nord- использовать публикации А.И. Радкевича, mann, 1837, Melanotus brunnipes (Germar, особенно в тех случаях, когда указаны 1824), Melanotus punctolineatus (Pelerin, виды, далеко выходящие за пределы сво- 1829), Orithales setraticornis (Paykull, 1800), их ареалов. Selatosomus latus (Fabricius, 1801), Sela- Не сохранилась коллекция щел- tosomus melancholicus (Fabricius, 1798) сом- кунов (Elateridae) A.B. Сугак (1932), со- нительны, коллекционные материалы от- бранная в Минской и Гомельской об- сутствуют (обозначены в списке ?). ластях. Для составления списка в ка- Указания жесткокрылых в работах честве источника информации по таксо- А.Ф. Кипенварлиц (1953,1961) и H.H. номии и номенклатуре были испол- Горбуновой (1956) основаны на коллек- ьзованы литературные данные Н. Silfver- ции, хранящейся в Белорусском научно- berg (1992), В. Burakowski et al. (серия исследовательском
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Key Factors Affecting the Diversity of Sphagnum Cover Inhabitants with the Focus on Ground Beetle Assemblages in Central-Eastern European Peat Bogs
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 20(1): 45-52, 2019 1585-8553 © AKADÉMIAI KIADÓ, BUDAPEST DOI: 10.1556/168.2019.20.1.5 Key factors affecting the diversity of Sphagnum cover inhabitants with the focus on ground beetle assemblages in Central-Eastern European peat bogs G. Sushko Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Vitebsk State University P. M. Masherov, Moskovski Ave. 33, 21008 Vitebsk, Belarus. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Belarus, Carabidae, diversity, environmental factors, Sphagnum dwellers. Abstract. A key structural component in peat bog formation is Sphagnum spp., which determines very specific associated envi- ronmental conditions. The aim of this study was to characterise some of the key factors affecting the diversity, species richness and abundance of sphagnum inhabiting ground beetles and to examine the maintenance of stable populations of cold adapted specialised peat bog species. A total of 52 carabid species were recorded by pitfall traps along six main habitats, such as the lagg zone, pine bog, hollows, hummock open bog and dome. The results are characterised by a low diversity, which vary significantly among habitat types, and include a high abundance of a few carabid species. Among the variables influencing carabid species richness and abundance were plant cover, pH and the conductivity of the Sphagnum mat water. Vascular plant cover was a key factor shaping carabid beetle assemblages in the slope and the dome, while electric conductivity affected carabid beetle assem- blage in the lagg. Whereas, the water level was the most important factor for the hollows. At the same time, peat bog specialists showed low sensitivity to the gradient of the analysed variables.
    [Show full text]
  • From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract
    Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino, 1998: XX LCE. (1996, Firenze, Italy) 107-170 James K. LIEBHERR and Kipling W. WILL* Inferring phylogenetic relationships within Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from characters of the female reproductive tract ABSTRACT Characters of the female reproductive tract, ovipositor, and abdomen are analyzed using cladi­ stic parsimony for a comprehensive representation of carabid beetle tribes. The resulting cladogram is rooted at the family Trachypachidae. No characters of the female reproductive tract define the Carabidae as monophyletic. The Carabidac exhibit a fundamental dichotomy, with the isochaete tri­ bes Metriini and Paussini forming the adelphotaxon to the Anisochaeta, which includes Gehringiini and Rhysodini, along with the other groups considered member taxa in Jeannel's classification. Monophyly of Isochaeta is supported by the groundplan presence of a securiform helminthoid scle­ rite at the spermathecal base, and a rod-like, elongate laterotergite IX leading to the explosion cham­ ber of the pygidial defense glands. Monophyly of the Anisochaeta is supported by the derived divi­ sion of gonocoxa IX into a basal and apical portion. Within Anisochaeta, the evolution of a secon­ dary spermatheca-2, and loss ofthe primary spermathcca-I has occurred in one lineage including the Gehringiini, Notiokasiini, Elaphrini, Nebriini, Opisthiini, Notiophilini, and Omophronini. This evo­ lutionary replacement is demonstrated by the possession of both spermatheca-like structures in Gehringia olympica Darlington and Omophron variegatum (Olivier). The adelphotaxon to this sper­ matheca-2 clade comprises a basal rhysodine grade consisting of Clivinini, Promecognathini, Amarotypini, Apotomini, Melaenini, Cymbionotini, and Rhysodini. The Rhysodini and Clivinini both exhibit a highly modified laterotergite IX; long and thin, with or without a clavate lateral region.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    1 CHANGES IN CARABID (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) ASSEMBLAGES AND DIVERSITY PATTERNS BETWEEN 1997 AND 2014 IN A DESALINIZED, INTENSIVELY CULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF NORTHERN CHINA XIN ZHANG College of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China College of Architecture and Art, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China PANLONG WU,YUNHUI LIU, YIN HAN, XUZHU ZHANG, PIAOPIAO DAI, ZHENRONG YU College of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China [email protected] AND JAN C. AXMACHER UCL Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK 2 ABSTRACT Reclamation of salinity-affected land for intensive agricultural production represents a highly promising pathway towards feeding our increasing global population. Nonetheless, biodiversity and ecosystem service responses to agricultural intensification in desalinized landscapes remain poorly understood. In our study, we analyzed long-term diversity responses of carabids as important pest control agents to agricultural intensification in desalinized landscapes by comparing data from 1997 and 2014, and we analyzed the potential role of field- margins as beetle refuge habitats. Despite agricultural intensification, carabid species richness increased significantly following desalinization, with this increase being chiefly limited to field margins. Carabid assemblages also showed a dramatic temporal species turnover, leading towards a species-rich homogeneous
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O19749
    Oikos o19749 Gerisch, M., Agostinelli, V., Henle, K. and Dziock, F. 2011. More species, but all do the same: contrasting effects of flood disturbance on ground beetle functional and species diversity. – Oikos 121: 508–515. Appendix A1 Tabelle1 Table A1. Full species list representing the standardized number of individuals per species for the study sites Steckby, Woerlitz, and Sandau. Density expresses the proportion of species standardized abundances to total abundance. Macropterous = winged, brachypterous = wingless, dimorphic = both forms can appear with a species. Body size is the average of maximum and minimum values found in the literature (for references see below). Wing Reproduction Body size Species names Steckby Woerlitz Sandau Density Morphology Season In mm Acupalpus dubius 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 2.6 Acupalpus exiguus 1.838 1.019 0.71 0.005 macropterous spring 2.7 Acupalpus parvulus 0.081 0.038 0.032 0 macropterous spring 3.6 Agonum dolens 0.032 0.038 0.081 0 dimorph spring 8.8 Agonum duftschmidi 14.966 2.755 0.016 0.025 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum emarginatum 116.659 4.472 25.194 0.208 macropterous spring 7.2 Agonum fuliginosum 0.097 0.038 0 0 dimorph spring 6.7 Agonum lugens 0.177 0 0.081 0 macropterous spring 9 Agonum marginatum 0.371 0.075 0.113 0.001 macropterous spring 9.2 Agonum micans 19.502 4.208 23.71 0.067 macropterous spring 6.6 Agonum muelleri 0 0.019 0 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum piceum 0.468 0 0.016 0.001 macropterous spring 6.4 Agonum sexpunctatum 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements
    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W
    30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005). Ground beetles are often chosen for study because they are abun- dant in most terrestrial habitats, diverse, taxonomically well known, serve as sensitive bioindicators of habitat change, easy to capture, and morphologically pleasing to the collector. North America north of Mexico accounts for 2635 species which were listed with their geographic distributions (states and provinces) in the catalogue by Bousquet and Larochelle (1993). In Table 4 of the latter refer- ence, the state of Wisconsin was associated with 374 ground beetle species. That is more than the surrounding states of Iowa (327) and Minnesota (323), but less than states of Illinois (452) and Michigan (466). The total count for Minnesota was subsequently increased to 433 species (Gandhi et al. 2005). Wisconsin county distributions are known for 15 species of tiger beetles (subfamily Cicindelinae) (Brust 2003) with collection records documented for Tetracha virginica (Grimek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN for the RUSSIAN FAR EAST ECOREGION COMPLEX Part 1
    CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST ECOREGION COMPLEX Part 1. Biodiversity and socio-economic assessment Editors: Yuri Darman, WWF Russia Far Eastern Branch Vladimir Karakin, WWF Russia Far Eastern Branch Andrew Martynenko, Far Eastern National University Laura Williams, Environmental Consultant Prepared with funding from the WWF-Netherlands Action Network Program Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, Blagoveshensk, Birobidzhan 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN. Part 1. 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1. The Russian Far East Ecoregion Complex 4 1.2. Purpose and Methods of the Biodiversity and Socio-Economic 6 Assessment 1.3. The Ecoregion-Based Approach in the Russian Far East 8 2. THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST ECOREGION COMPLEX: 11 A BRIEF BIOLOGICAL OVERVIEW 2.1. Landscape Diversity 12 2.2. Hydrological Network 15 2.3. Climate 17 2.4. Flora 19 2.5. Fauna 23 3. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST 29 ECOREGION COMPLEX: FOCAL SPECIES AND PROCESSES 3.1. Focal Species 30 3.2. Species of Special Concern 47 3.3 .Focal Processes and Phenomena 55 4. DETERMINING PRIORITY AREAS FOR CONSERVATION 59 4.1. Natural Zoning of the RFE Ecoregion Complex 59 4.2. Methods of Territorial Biodiversity Analysis 62 4.3. Conclusions of Territorial Analysis 69 4.4. Landscape Integrity and Representation Analysis of Priority Areas 71 5. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICES IN BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 77 5.1. Legislative Basis for Biodiversity Conservation in the RFE 77 5.2. The System of Protected Areas in the RFE 81 5.3. Conventions and Agreements Related to Biodiversity Conservation 88 in the RFE 6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFLUENCES 90 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera I. Löbl & A. S
    CATALOGUE OF PALAEARCTIC COLEOPTERA I. LÖBL & A. SMETANA ERRATA ERRATA for VOLUME 1 Sphaeriusidae p. 26, add AB to distribution of Sphaerius acaroides Waltl, 1838 Gyrinidae p. 27, add: guernei Méquignon, 1942: 9 in synonymy with Gyrinus distinctus Aubé, 1838 p. 29, correct spelling of Orectochilus allax Peschet, 1923 to fallax Peschet, 1923 Trachypachidae p. 33, add CT to distribution of Trachypachus zetterstedti Gyllenhal, 1827 Hygrobiidae p. 35, add SZ to distribution of Hygrobia hermanni Fabricius, 1775 Noteridae p. 33, add N: TU AFR to distribution of Canthydrus diophthalmus (Reiche & Saulcy, 1855) p. 34, remove AFR from distribution of Canthydrus laetabilis (Walker, 1858) p. 34, add A: IQ SA SY to distribution of Canthydrus luctuosus (Aubé, 1838) p. 34, add ORR to distribution of Canthydrus nitidulus Sharp, 1882, and add bifasciatus Régimbart, 1889b: 148 to its synonymy p. 34, add AFR to distribution of Canthydrus notula (Erichson, 1843) p. 34, remove Neohydrocoptus angolensis (Peschet, 1925), the Palaearctic records refer to N. jaechi p. 34, add: N: EG A: SI to distribution of Neohydrocoptus jaechi (Wewalka, 1989) Dytiscidae p. 37, Agabus labiatus (Brahm, 1791): change year to 1790 p. 40, Agabus nebulosus (Forter, 1771): add synonym humeralis Audinet-Serville, 1821: 96 (Dytiscus) p. 41, Ilybius balkei (Fery & Nilsson, 1993): add original genus assignment (Agabus) p. 42, Ilybius erichsoni (Gemminger & Harold, 1868): add original genus assignment (Agabus) p. 43, Ilybius subtilis (Erichson, 1837): add original genus assignment (Agabus) p. 45, Meladema lanio (Fabricius, 1775), synonym Colymbetes lowei Gray, 1832: change year to 1831 p. 48, Acilius canaliculatus (Nicolai, 1822), synonym Dytiscus sulcipennis Zetterstedt, 1824: change author to C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aohan Dryland Farming System. Proposal for the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems
    Proposal for Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Programme Aohan Dryland Farming System Location: Aohan County, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China People’s Government of Aohan County, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Natural and Cultural Heritage of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences December 12, 2011 1 Summary Information a. Country and Location: Aohan County, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China b. Program Title/System Title: Aohan Dryland Farming System c. Total Area: 8294 km2 d. Ethnic Groups: Mongolian (5.34%), Manchu (1.11%), Hui (0.29%), Han (93.21%) e. Application Organization: Aohan County People’s Government, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China f. From the National Key Organization (NFPI): Centre for Natural and Cultural Heritage (CNACH) of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) g. Governmental and Other Partners • Ministry of Agriculture, P.R. China • China Agricultural University • Department of Agriculture of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China • Aohan County People’s Government, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China • Department of Agriculture of Aohan County, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China • Department of Culture of Aohan County, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China • Key Laboratory of Dry Farming Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China h. Abstract Aohan County is located in the southeast of Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. It is the interface between China’s ancient farming culture and grassland culture. From 2001 to 2003, carbonized particles of foxtail and broomcorn millet were discovered by archaeologists in the “First Village of China”, Xinglongwa in Aohan County.
    [Show full text]
  • Käferbeifänge Am Licht (Coleoptera) ______
    Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte, 54, 2010/3-4 Jörg Lorenz, Tharandt Käferbeifänge am Licht (Coleoptera) ___________________________________________________________________________ Z u s a m m e n f a s s u n g Die Auswertung von 75 Käferbeifängen am Licht aus den Jahren 1993-2007 erbrachte insgesamt 683 Käferarten. Durch die Teilnahme des Autors an neun wei- teren Lichtfängen im Jahr 2009, die in diesem Artikel jedoch nicht mit ausgewertet wurden, kommen 13 bisher nicht gefundene Arten hinzu, sodass insgesamt 700 Käferarten am Licht nachweisbar waren. Es werden 48 Lichtfänge genannt und ausgewertet, bei denen alle Käfer erfasst wurden. Auf die am häufigsten vom Licht angelockten Käferarten sowie faunistische Besonderheiten wird näher eingegangen. Bei geeigneter Witterung konnten bis zu 129 Käferarten in einer Licht- fangnacht erbeutet werden. Außerdem werden die mit Lichtfang und Bodenfallen am gleichen Standort erfassten der Artenspektren von Laufkäfern und aquatischen Käfern verglichen und diskutiert. S u m m a r y Beetles in light trap by-catches (Coleoptera). – Analysis of the beetle by- catch during light trapping at 75 occasions in 1993-2007 yielded a total of 683 species. 13 previusly unrecorded species were obtained during nine additional light-trapping events in 2009 resulting in a total of 700 beetle species taken at light. However, these last records were not included in the present anaysis. At 48 occasions during liht trapping all beetles were re- covered. They are recorded and analyzed. Emphais is on the species most frequently attracted to light, and on faunistic peculiarities. Under suitable weather conditions up to 129 beetle spe- cies were obtained during a single night of light trapping.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovery of the Endangered Species Harpalus Flavescens
    Rediscovery of the endangered species Harpalus flavescens (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Loire River Olivier Denux, Emmanuelle Dauffy-Richard, Jean-Pierre Rossi, Sylvie Augustin To cite this version: Olivier Denux, Emmanuelle Dauffy-Richard, Jean-Pierre Rossi, Sylvie Augustin. Rediscovery ofthe endangered species Harpalus flavescens (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Loire River. Insect conserva- tion and diversity, Wiley-Blackwell, 2017, 10 (6), 7 p. 10.1111/icad.12228. hal-01605515 HAL Id: hal-01605515 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01605515 Submitted on 25 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License Insect Conservation and Diversity (2017) doi: 10.1111/icad.12228 SHORT COMMUNICATION Rediscovery of the endangered species Harpalus flavescens (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Loire River OLIVIER DENUX,1,2 EMMANUELLE DAUFFY-RICHARD,3,† 4 1 JEAN-PIERRE ROSSI and SYLVIE AUGUSTIN 1INRA, UR 633, Zoologie Forestiere, Orleans, France, 2Entomotec, Nouan-le-Fuzelier, France, 3IRSTEA, UR EFNO, Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France and 4INRA, UMR CBGP, Montferrier-sur-Lez Cedex, France Abstract. 1. The Loire River is one of the last European large rivers with important sediment dynamics and numerous sandbanks.
    [Show full text]